Is sustainable architecture aspirational? 1.4 BILLION Indians think this...

Listen to the full conversation here: • Guardian of the built ...
💚 If you gain value from this conversation, we hope you will subscribe to the channel 💚
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We are also available on
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/40hjls7...
Apple podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast...
View episode notes on
www.ecogradia.com/
Read about sustainable projects on
www.ecogradia.com/blog/
Subscribe to our fortnightly newsletter
ecogradia.us5.list-manage.com...
No spamming here! :)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Follow us on 🖱️
Instagram: / ecogradia
LinkedIn: / ecogradia

Пікірлер: 5

  • @aymanali5491
    @aymanali54912 ай бұрын

    You are doing great discussions on architecture!

  • @Ecogradia

    @Ecogradia

    2 ай бұрын

    We are glad you like them!

  • @ckush928
    @ckush9282 ай бұрын

    From a long term point-of-view, isn't an RCC structure more sustainable as it will last longer. Also becomes very hard to earthquake-proof these mud/bamboo structures, if at all. Experimentation with different materials/techniques can still be done with non-structural parts like walls and claddings.

  • @aymanali5491

    @aymanali5491

    2 ай бұрын

    Sustainability is not about materials only, there are more facets to it, social sustainability: local labour force and craftsman get to have jobs as they can work with local materials, environmental sustainability: These muds and bamboos are not emitting tons of carbon. Economic Sustainability: Local materials are cheaper, easier to source, easier to replace.

  • @ckush928

    @ckush928

    2 ай бұрын

    @@aymanali5491 Yeah they will get to work on it again and again after every natural disaster.