i would rather say that sri lanka was a part of ravan's lanka, which could be a bigger island or a group of island, a part of which got sunk. because otherwise it would not match with current placement of rameshwaram temple, and the fact that the distance covered by lord hanuman was 100 yojan. which is he distance between India and srilanka coast.

@shenalmendis4406

2 ай бұрын

No geological record for such a deluge

@arupsarkar3345

2 ай бұрын

I agree ❤ and it is mentioned in old tamil sangam lit.

@ManOnRoad

2 ай бұрын

srilanka wouldnt be a island back then

@upendrablissfulkumar6465

2 ай бұрын

In ancient scriptures srilanka s called as SINHALA DWEEPA, but later how it b came sri Lanka 😢

@BogalaSawundiris

2 ай бұрын

The Sri Lanka of today was called Singhal as mentioned in Mahabharat. That is the original name of the Sri Lanka you see today. The Singhal nation in Mahabharat fought on the Kaurava side, and that is why there is a caste called Karava in Sri Lanka.

The Sri Lanka of today was called Singhal as mentioned in Mahabharat. That is the original name of the Sri Lanka you see today. The Singhal nation in Mahabharat fought on the Kaurava side, and that is why there is a caste called Karava in Sri Lanka.

During Tsunami back in 2004, ocean water withdraw from shore 1 to 2 km back. During that time people saw temple like ruins off of south beaches of Sri lanka.

I’m the Srilankan, SriLanka has sita hide place called sita elliya. And hanuman takes himalaya parts of including medicine Ayurvedic plants In SriLanka has Rumassala island same as himalya Ayurvedic plant includes. So srilanka ancient story explains that island is hanuman takes part of it.

@ravisanthosh078

2 ай бұрын

Your srilanka is called ceylone or simhala dweep by historians...and only becuase of the tourism and to get cash from tourism ......govt started this sita and hanuman parts...but as per the valmiki ramayana, tha ravana lanka is completely different and dont know what happened to it.

@Thrillex4523

2 ай бұрын

​@@ravisanthosh078them what about Ram setu? Why it was made if ravan lanka was in maldives then ramsetu would have been made there, right?

@jetha199

2 ай бұрын

​​​​@@Thrillex4523that's not real ramsetu of ramayana,because its all are sands and rocks, real ramsetu was made of woods, bamboos and other natural things by Nal and Neel, and after saving Sita Mata Shri Rama destroyed that Ram Setu for protection of Lanka, also Lanka isn't Maldives...

@ravisanthosh078

2 ай бұрын

@@Thrillex4523 i was about to reply for this expected question.. but @jetha199 replied..thank you

@Thrillex4523

2 ай бұрын

@@ravisanthosh078 Reasoning is good but these facts are not proved, also there are lot of things related to ramayan in lanka like footprints of hanuman bhagwan in Sri lanka, people of Sri lanka also worships Ravan.

Valmiki Ramayana Clearly explains that RAVANA LANKA used to be 1213 kms in length and 363.9 kms width. Maldives once stood as a high mountain, before getting submerged in the Indian Ocean. But the present-day Lanka is about 20 miles off the Indian coast at its nearest point.

@MAYUR600

2 ай бұрын

Yep correct , half the people who argue are spoiled by Ramanand sagar's ramayan , Hanuman travelled 100 yojanas approx 800km to find sita maa , he flew with such a speed that ocean was split on his journey

@BogalaSawundiris

2 ай бұрын

The Sri Lanka of today was called Singhal as mentioned in Mahabharat. That is the original name of the Sri Lanka you see today. The Singhal nation in Mahabharat fought on the Kaurava side, and that is why there is a caste called Karava in Sri Lanka.

@user-cw1bw8uo8s

2 ай бұрын

Check whether (Nagappattinam) Ramasethu to SriLanka Rumassala Island distance is 1264Km

@vedavathip9342

2 ай бұрын

​@@MAYUR600🎉🎉😂

@premprakashmishra301

Күн бұрын

​@@MAYUR600 Ramanand Sagar had made Ramayan majorly on the basis of Ram Charit Manas, not on Valmiki Ramayan.

Right it's Kumari kandam submerged Island 200 yojana from ujjain

Yo bro, at the time of ravana, the sri lanka island was a part of the big island that was lanka, and it might be that sri lanka might have been a mountain types hence the ram setu was made to go to sri lanka then it connected to lanka thru big island because that time sea levels were down, very down. eg. newzeland, has a massive island submerged in sea, and new zeland was a mountain type hence the part that is now new zeland only the top is avaliable, rest is submerged. like wise lanka, sri lanka

this is one of the most exciting subjects I have come across in a long time. archeo astronomy and all that stuff that fixes the time and events. Really mind blowing info. This is real knowledge that the newer generations need to know. \

@venkatabhinavpoluri1748

15 күн бұрын

But sadly some so called liberals strike off our history by saying mythology and they think they are cool 😢

Sir, Pampa is referred in Valmiki Ramayana. Actually Pampa River is in Kerala and there is also a place Rameshwaram in Kerala. Can you throw some light on this...

@PrashanthBSPBS

2 ай бұрын

The river flowing through hampi was called as pampa back then … hence the name place came from pampi became hampi … hanuman birth place is close enough to hampi

@arunae1091

2 ай бұрын

Pampa was Hampe or Hampi. Hampi is believed to be a part of Kishkinda.

@9970060160

2 ай бұрын

​@@PrashanthBSPBSThat river has been called Tungabhadra for the longest of times not Pampa.

Ranveer should stop using the words "extreme-right-wing people". These right wing left wing names are used in american politics, not here in Bharat.

@GauravKunwar-js7dc

12 күн бұрын

BJP is right wing

Last thousand years 😂SL history has now has over 120000 years history quote Evidence of human colonization in Sri Lanka appears at the site of Balangoda. Balangoda Man arrived on the island about 125,000 years ago and has been identified as Mesolithic hunter-gatherers who lived in caves. Several of these caves, including the well-known Batadombalena and the Fa Hien Cave, have yielded many artifacts from these people, who are currently the first known inhabitants of the island.

What about the Rameshwaram temple location? It is said Ram Ji made the shivling before crossing the setu that was built. And it’s right near the Ram setu that’s there today?

very nice

00:02 Hanuman's journey to Lanka is interpreted differently by archaeologist Rupa Bhati. 00:49 Ravan's Lanka was east of Maldives on the Equator. 01:30 Earth's crust below the ocean is unusually thin 02:06 Evidence of islands submerging due to volcanic activity 02:47 Speculation on Sri Lanka as Ravan's Lanka 03:24 Sri Lanka's name given in 1972, possibly part of Ravana's Kingdom 03:58 Sri Lanka was referred to as Simal in the past 04:38 Sri Lanka is not Ravan's Lanka but possibly a submerged island with volcanic activity Crafted by Merlin AI.

Was lemuria (Kumari kundam) present there at the Southern most area of Indian Pennensular at the time of Ramayana??

@vireshsaluja

2 ай бұрын

Lemuria Had A Huge Territory South Of India To Vietnam To Philippines & Areas Nearby.

@tomalkirttonia1609

2 ай бұрын

Lemuria is just a myth

some people can give opinions in their point of view. But they are not always right. Sri Lanka has so many places and historical evidence which can prove Ravana was a ruler of this country. And he says Sinhala Deepa was the name not Lanka. Guys Sri Lanka has been called by so many names at the same time. we were called as Lanka and after Britian's came here, they changed the name to Ceylon. What we did was after we got the freedom we got our old name. the thing is some young Indians questioning Ramayana and most of them are not agreeing what Rama did with Seetha when she return. talking about Ravana and his power, his skill is surprisingly increasing among Indians. And this guy would not like to give that identity to Sri Lanka just because Sri Lanka is such a small country. he doesn't want to say that Ravana came from such a small country and did all that damage to them that going to talk about thousands of years. and he doesn't want name any other country as a Ravana's Lanka and just say it's a Maldives Island which we can't see now. Are u serious? the thing is they want to ignore all the ancient books and places and evidence in both countries just to save their history and pride.

@sainirup8079

Ай бұрын

Sri Lanka is a part of AkhandBharat ...Chill bro ....

@fromheaven8157

Ай бұрын

@@sainirup8079 nope it is not. We are different from u guys in every possible way. We have our own proud history. Indians always try to point out that they are the best among all the countries. that's ok. but do not try to put your hands into other countries.

@ruwanfonseka

Ай бұрын

@@fromheaven8157 Yes, the name Sri Lanka was officially given as the name to India's neighbouring country only in 1972, by changing it from Ceylon that how it was called by the British, and prior to receiving independence in 1948 it was called British Ceylon. In 1972, the country became a republic within the Commonwealth, and its name was changed to Sri Lanka. Prior to that until 1972 it was Dominion of Ceylon and had a Governor-General who represented the British Monarch (Queen or King) just like it is today with Canada, Australia and New Zealand. In the ancient times Sri Lanka was called by many other names other than Ceylon and among them are Seilan, Serendib (Called by Arabs), Simhaladvipa, Tambapanni, Taprobane (Called by Greeks). Unfortunately there are a few in Sri Lanka are trying to distort history by saying that Sri Lanka is Ravana's Lanka that is mentioned in the Ramayana Indian Epic. These few people in as you mentioned to get cash from tourism and attract Indian tourists even falsely claim that the Sigiriya World Heritage Site was Ravana's palace. Sigiriya has nothing to do with Ravana mentioned in the Ramayanaya. There is archealogical and historical artifact evidence that Sigiriya was built by the Sri Lankan king Kashyapa I of Anuradhapura (of the Kingdom of Anuradhapura in Sri Lanka), Cuurently it is considered that the Sigiriya Rock World Heritage Site built by king Kashyapa I of Anuradhapura was used as a Royal Pleasure Garden. Based on Sri Lankan archealogical findings Ravana's Lanka is completely different that the currently known country of Sri Lanka. Dr Senarath Dissanayake who served as the Director General of the Department of Archeology has spoken a lot about the lie of trying to claim that Ravana mentioned in the Ramayana Epic lived in Sri Lanka, and one can fine several discussions where he says about it can be found in videos on KZread (like the one that has the title "රාවණා තනිකරම බොරුවක් - පුරාවිද්‍යා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ඡනරාල් මහාචාර්ය සෙනරත් දිසානායක | History Special EP"). Even Ellawala Medhananda Thero (එල්ලාවල මේධානන්ද) who is a Sri Lankan Buddhist monk and an academic scholar has spoken about the false claim that some people claim Ravana lived in Sri Lanka (one can find the video titiled "රාවණාගේ ඇත්ත නැත්ත" and "රාවණාගේ ඇත්ත නැත්ත | Story of Ravana | එල්ලාවල මේධානන්ද හිමි | Ellawala Medhananda Thero").

@ruwanfonseka

Ай бұрын

@@fromheaven8157 Ellawala Medhananda Thero from Sri Lanka explains about the words Seetha Eliya - means සීත එලිය (Seetha means cold) , Ravana - means නාද කරන්නා (i.e. one who makes a noise), Seethawaka - සීත වක (Seetha means cold) all these names have nothing to do with Ravana or Seetha that is mentioned in the Indian Ramayana Epic.

@supremegodemperordonaldtru3563

Ай бұрын

@@sainirup8079 India is part of AkhandMuslimdesh ...Chill bro...

need a another episode of dr.nilesh oak 🇱🇰🙏

This hypothesis can be totally wrong. If Srilanka is not actual ravan's lanka, it will defeat the several myths and legenda surrounding the temple nomenclature in Tamil Nadu. For example , the 'Ramar paadham - Rama's foot' in Kodikkarai , TN - Intitally Ram thought, this is the best place to cross to Srilanka, before going to Dhanush Koti. The several temples near rameshwaram - which talks about Ram's legend. All will go for a toss , if Srilanka is actually not Ravana's lanka. Even from a geological point of view ,the presence of Coral reefs and floating rocks will further defeat the argument.

@Princessalishia

2 ай бұрын

Yes exactly.

@user-cw1bw8uo8s

2 ай бұрын

Please visit the SriLanka, SriLanka has sita hide place ,,in cave area it is called Sita eliya. And Hanuman takes himalaya parts , and that parts have Ayurvedic medicine, same Ayurvedic medicines plant s including place called ‘Rumassala’ Island Sri Lanka. Another ancient place has ravana Lives and lay’s down place (sleeping place) called Yahangala, Ravana Ella, Ravana Lena etc. if you visit the SriLanka. You can see your own eyes and believe that. Not only the comment.

@shashwatkataria2018

2 ай бұрын

Baseless arguments.

@ruwanfonseka

Ай бұрын

@@user-cw1bw8uo8s Ellawala Medhananda Thero from Sri Lanka explains about the words Seetha Eliya - means සීත එලිය (Seetha means cold) , Ravana - means නාද කරන්නා (i.e. one who makes a noise/sound), Seethawaka - සීත වක (Seetha means cold) all these names have nothing to do with Ravana or Seetha that is mentioned in the Indian Ramayana Epic.

@bhavishdhankar1943

Ай бұрын

power of money & fund to destroy any religion। this is one of the Attempt by fundamentalist

According to Ramayana distance between India and Ravanlanka is 1280 kms..

@trs clips .bring janakiram cosmic channel to the show .he researched so much on this and told this in 2018 .

Already about actual Sri Lanka is discussed by Janaki Ram cosmic KZread channel in Telugu.

Anyone noticed that two persons but one voice sound🤔

@carlover5763

2 ай бұрын

Voices are completely different.

@IndoBruh

Ай бұрын

You mean both sounded same ?

What u saying is true...Atalankawa 🙏🙏🙏

@pranshulsingh7061

18 күн бұрын

Atlankawa = Atlantis?

@vinodratnayake

18 күн бұрын

@pranshulsingh7061 Yes we have Buddhist suthra called 'Ata naatiya' that suthra revealed all the kings ruled by Ata lankawa

Then what about rameshwaram and dhanushkodi

Vibhishana is still alive..and still ruling the kingdom.. He is a chiranjivi.. That means Lanka is still there just can't be seen with our eyes.. Its covered by vibhishanas maya sakti..

@Harshel_Rawat

Ай бұрын

Is vibhishan still alive ?

@90shiphop-gl4zo

Ай бұрын

what an arguement

@Abri612

Ай бұрын

😂 ku6 v

what about rameshwaram then?

All the relatives of Ravan died in battle, except Vibhishan. Vibhishan lived like a Vaishnava. The present day population of Sri Lanka has 3 major race: 1. The indegenous inhabitants of Lanka ( The children of Vibhishan ). 2. Buddhist preachers who migrated to Sri Lanka from Odisha or Bengal. 3. The Tamil people who migrated to Sri Lanka during the Chola period.

@skipper2594

2 ай бұрын

buddhists preachers are not who migrated to lanka sinhalese race started by west bengal genes mixed with local indigenous inhabitants. they were animists or hindus for years after many years , ashoka s son gave buddhism to sinhalese , until then , sinhalese were hindus so who came to lanka was hindus not buddhists.

@skipper2594

2 ай бұрын

yes tamils came to sri lanka with cholas in 997 AD (after 1700 years of arrival of sinhalese,)then chola s couldnt ever capture whole island of lanka bcz of strong sinhalese kingdoms, bcz of sinhalese resistence cholas couldnt even stay in lanka for at least 80 years, but tamil population was stayed there and there were significant tamil population enough in lanka to form JAFFNA KINGDOM in 1215 AD (within 200 years of tamils arrival to lanka)

@skipper2594

2 ай бұрын

but they came from north india , so they can be buddhists too, bcz north india was buddhist that time, according to sri lankan books , (may be these can be just myths)buddha have told to god shakra to protect vijaya s voyage to lanka bcz sinhalese and sri lanka will be the only place where buddhism will be alive for 5000 years and sinhalese and lanka will be commited to buddhas dharma marga ,I m just saying what I heard and read as a kid when we see the times , vijaya s time and buddha s time are also almost same timeline and sinhalese and sri lanka sacrificed so much already for buddhism and simply its a joke buddhism without lanka so I think may be those things can be true...

@skipper2594

2 ай бұрын

sinhalese and sri lanka did these 1- written down pali tripitaka on books to protect it during a 6 year famine called baminithiya saaya( baminithiya sagathaya)thats how pali tripitaka was protected to the future 2- originating THERAVADA tradition 3- spread it to thailand myanmar and cambodia(sinhalese call it dharma doota seva) 4- protecting bodhgaya for future by srimath anagarika dharmapala (a sinhalese lankan) 5- he also founded mahabodhi society still active in india and lanka 6- making and designing global buddhist flag by lanka 7- giving protection for world oldest human planted tree. a branch of original india bodhi tree 8- first country who spread buddhism to europe by founding pali text society 9- did pancha maha vada (5 great debates) with brits xians which drag attention of europe to buddhism which lead sir henry steel aulcutt and blawatski to come to lanka 10- modern mahameuna monasteries do dharma doota seva s world wide

@dr.ddeepalakshmi1051

2 ай бұрын

If srilanka is not Ravans Lanka lot of questions will be unanswered!!! Ni wer eliya is Ashoka vana where seetha was kept captive, the Rama bodha where Ramas forces were aligned. The aginipravesha village where even today the tribals take an oath!!! So many points to ponder!

Sri Lanka was definitely Ravan’s Lanka….

@MAYUR600

2 ай бұрын

LOL Are you saying Hanuman Travelled 100 yojanas from to find srilanka , kid time to read valmiki ramayan seriouly

@sabrinaislam6559

2 ай бұрын

Full episode link please

@sirajsriranjan7449

2 ай бұрын

Sri Lanka is Ravans Lanka

@MAYUR600

2 ай бұрын

lol agreed only people who ddnot rad valmki ramayana will beleive it@@sirajsriranjan7449

@Thrillex4523

2 ай бұрын

I also think so, Sri lanka is what was called lanka in Ramayan, all these theories that are coming now are just for entertainment.

One book infinite angles ⭐

Its submerged kumarikandam or lemuria .lord.murugan was the kind of lemuria

havent you guys heard about " kumari kandam " may be that could explain the whole disappearance of Ravans lanka. A bigger peice of the current sri lanka would have just submerged in to the sea.

If East of Maldives, then the present day Sri Lanka may also be part of Ravana's Lanka.

Where are they going to prove this RAVAN nonsense over Sinhalese king Kashyapa's palace built in SIGIRIYA (සීගිරිය ) in 3 AD century in Sri Lanka?

@harisaraharisara7828

Ай бұрын

Sigiriya had been occupied by WAISRAVANA !!! His father was WISHRAWAS SAGE who was one of the SAPTA RHISHIS who composed VEDA VERSES @ about 2 5 0 0 B.C. !!!

What about LANKA-RAN located at Azarbaijan.

if true this would change alot of what we know but i think ramayana and mahabharata happened but was exaggerated later

@Harshel_Rawat

Ай бұрын

Many people just watch tv serial they didn't read Valmiki Ramayan or ved vyasa Mahabharat. That's why they don't know that this is not the original sri Lanka that is mentioned in Ramayan

Present Srilanka can’t be Ravana’s Lanka. When Vanaras were debating who can cross the ocean to reach Lanka the distance mentioned was 100 yojanas. One yojana is 8 miles. This means present Srilanka is not Ravana’s Lanka as the distance from Rameshvaram (close to which is the Gandhamadana mountain from which Hanuman Ji leaped to reach banks) to Srilanka today is about 30 miles. One cannot rule out catastrophic events causing tectonic shifts in landmass bringing lanka closer to India.

soo what? sri lanka is at the east of maldives😂, and as he says sri lanka name was given in 1972 , bcz brits changed its name as ceylon ,even tho sri part wasnt before , the island was called as LANKADWEEPA (dweepa meens island in sinhalese) in sri lankan ancient books and rock tablets(shila lekhana in sinhala language) brits came and named maldives and sri lanka and made a new ruling area called british ceylon as brits come and named ban -pak-in-myanmar all as one british raj what sri lanka did in 1972 was recognice their old country name as their official name again by removing brits gave one imagine india was once bharat , brits named it as india , but india kept it even after independence what sri lank did was , sri lanka once was lankadweepa , brits named it ceylon, but sri lanka didnt kept it and changed their name back to their previous one adding SRI part to begining

@wanderlost7707

2 ай бұрын

Ranveer says this claim is "evidence-based" but neither he nor Oak shares the evidence with the viewers, so we are still at sea (pun not intended).

@indiabharatshakthi

2 ай бұрын

Yes sri lanka was identified as lankadweepa , sinhaladweepa ,heladweepa ,not time to time , AT THE SAME TIME , as synonyms .☺️. And In sinhala language Ra means sun 🌞 .(even the god of sun in egypt also called RA as same as in sinhala ). Vana is comming from VARNA .means caste in sinhala (also in my indian language , varna is use to call castes)...so RAVANA means the sun caste in sinhalese.. Its hillarious to see dravidian tamils always try to claim ravana as their tamil 😂😂😂

@user-ib2dq7ev5n

2 ай бұрын

​​@@indiabharatshakthi actually, Spoken sinhala = IRA Formal sinhala = SURYA there other bunch of synonyms but won't put here as they don't make any difference.. It's not Ra in anywhere.. Ira most probably from old sinhala(prakrit) or a thathbhava word from sanskrit Surya..😊

@diagocooray9884

2 ай бұрын

​@@user-ib2dq7ev5nIm a sinhalese..by the way in Sinhala , sun was called as RA in original form.(what we use now is simple modern sinhala.) 2) And varna is use to call kula (castes)...its even unbeievable to say sinhalese like you dont know VARNA is use to call castes in sinhala language 😂😂😂.. Have you ever heard of varnabeda jaathi beda words?.. Here varnabeda was meant caste problems....color problems never had in sri lanka in past.but caste problems were 😂thats what varna beda meant If you ever went to sunday dhamma school in 🇱🇰 you would have definitly know that the sinhalese text books have " CHATHURVARNA" as a lesson.😂in there chathurvarna in sinhalese means also 4 castes.we learn them as kshathriya, brahmana , waishya , shudra in 🇱🇰 වර්ණ- colors වර්න - caste Pls at least ask from your grand parents .they wil say you.sad to see sinhalese loosing the knowledge of their own language 😢

@indiabharatshakthi

2 ай бұрын

@@user-ib2dq7ev5n dont argue with me Im not a sinhalese.I say what I know.but I dont knoe much about your language to argue with you.but I can confirm sihalese word varna = caste too

Why people dont like this video? .views are rising.likes are at the same place

@KatrChatr-tm3su

2 ай бұрын

It may be a fact but people are not liking it. Cause in each mahayuga there are kritayuga tretayuga dwaparyuga kaliyuga. There were mahayugas before this mahayuga. so Ramayan or Mahabharata has been happening in different places in India. Recently heard about issues over lord hanuman birth place some say he born at seshachala hills which are located at lord balaji tirumala and some say he born north india and some say karnataka like this

Has no one heard about Kumari Kandam?🤷🏼

Ceylon is the name that the British gave

@harisaraharisara7828

Ай бұрын

Ancient Greeks called Ceylon as CEYĹAN !!!

I'm sri lanken, so as a sri lanken we have our own story of ravana same as you all having you believes

❤❤❤❤

All Sinhalese know that majority of the island is sunk. Rawana city is sunk. The Maldives are the remnants of mountains. This guy needs to visit the island and see how much of the Sinhalese traditions and culture are involved with Rawana. Come visit and see his martial arts, medical practices, and even places throughout, baring his name. Simply put, where did you find this guy 😆 Although yes, correct name before Sri Lanka was Sinhaladip. Think Samudragupta inscription says the same 👍🏽😮

@shaileshs.3177

4 күн бұрын

So you agree Sri Lanka wasn't called Lanka back then ? Then Nilesh is right about SL not being Ravana's Lanka. Also the 100 yojana distance between Bharat & Lanka mentioned in Ramayan is not existing between India & SL.

Ravaans lanka is Sri Lanka that is no doubt but Maldives was also a part of raavans kingdom it can happen where Ravaan frequently visits and established many things. But it can happen Raavan born in Maldives and then settle in lanka . He did not separate it from his kingdom and it might be his financial capital. These things can happen. But lanka war happened in Sri Lanka.

I think this refers to SiwHelaDweepa not SinhalaDweepa. Siw (means 04) hela Dweepa consists of Jabu dweepa, Lanka dweepa, Kuru dweepa and Giri dweepa. Lanka Dweepa was located in east of Sri Lanka.

@harisaraharisara7828

Ай бұрын

Sie Hela Dviepa is the remaining part of Ravana's Lanka !!! A bigger part has got sunk at the Maha Bharata war !!!

Cant you see the behaviour of our Sri Lankans and all the crazy things we do.

I'm sorry..But Lanka is not on 0 degree equator

@narayangl

2 ай бұрын

He is referring to where it was before it submerged not the current day Sri Lanka

this is non sense for sure as the ramsetu is real and that is the original lanka since the time of anuradhapura

this is like making a debate like where the hogwards located. :P

All research nothing practical 😂😂

Jai siya ram

How could you say Sri Lanka is where longitude and latitude intersect ? Null Island near Gulf of guinea is (0,0). He is neither archeologist nor a geologist. May be a conspiracy theorist.

Jatayupara in Kollam, proves he’s wrong

I don't agree with this logic..but sri lanka was a huge country and many part of Sri Lanka are under water

@MAYUR600

2 ай бұрын

Srilanka and India share same tectonic plate means if India mainland further moves upnorth , so doeslanka study geology first

Has anyone even tried where 0 longitude and latitude is.? Mate, that's hell away from east of Maldives. It's in Gulf of Guinea, called Null Island. 😑

Yakka,deva,naaga,habara siwhela sinhala

जय श्री राम 🙏

One of the most Stupidest Explanation & Reasoning ever..... 😑😑😑😑

@thamizh.tamilnaduwillseper1707

2 ай бұрын

Then whats truth

Archaeologist ❌️ Ancient alien show archaeologist✅️ 😂

@Viddrohh

2 ай бұрын

Lol

I disagree. How do you explain the significance of Ram Setu and the entire Rameshwaram sequence of events?

Sri Lanka is actually not the original name of what we today call Sri Lanka. Seriously go and read the Mahabharata. It clearly calls Sri Lanka "Simhaladvipa". This who "Sri Lanka" business is new historically speaking.

Is Ramayana for real? What am I smoking??

Sri Lanka is Ravana's Lanka. These idiots don't want to aspect it.

Ravan lanka s placed on nirayan degree

you dont know ravana

Ravana was a Tamil king who ruled from south kumari ( kumaros) to imayamalay ( himalaya). He belonged to Pandya dynasty .

@penguinsofindia4754

2 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂

@DRvlogs19

2 ай бұрын

Ravana was a “hela king” not a tamil king. Dnt have any proof to say he is tamil. (Hela means old srilanka)

@mba056-lokeshwaran.k2

2 ай бұрын

@@DRvlogs19 brother go and read history when was srilanka named Sri Lanka

@DRvlogs19

2 ай бұрын

@@mba056-lokeshwaran.k2 i can assure you that revan is not a tamil king. I know the history here.

@DRvlogs19

2 ай бұрын

@@mba056-lokeshwaran.k2 read lankawathara suthraya.

0 Latitude 0 Longitude to Atlantic Ocean me ayega

🙏 🙏 🙏 gyaniji apko pranam, itna gyan le kar ek naya ramayan likh dijie

@nitinbhatnagar6085

2 ай бұрын

Bhai....he is talking sense....

This fellow needs to come up with smart follow up questions..

Nice story...fool some layman.. Ranveer perhaps if you don't have a good resource abstain from doing jerky shows confusing people around

Sri Lanka is at the east of maldivs

@harisaraharisara7828

Ай бұрын

Maldives and CEYLON are remaining parts of Ravana's LANKA !!!

Rama-sethu is not a natural thing.

Who built Ram Setu We have places called Sita Eliya where Sita Devi was hidden Mountain of herbs from the Himalayas dropped by Lord Hanuman Please don't twist ancient history according to your whims and fancies Pardon me according to you Ramayana is a lie I need a reply to my comment

@EkaSanatani

2 ай бұрын

Let me give you the full story of fraud Nilesh Oak. He came up with a fraud date for Ramayana which is 12K BCE. He then realised that at that time (12K BCE), sea water level was that low that a bridge to Sri Lanka was not needed. Bhagwan Rama can just walk to Lanka, no need Rama Setu. His ego did not allow him to admit that he's wrong. So, he did the next best thing, tell lies to cover up the original mistake. So, he comes out with first lie, which is Sri Lanka is not Ravana's Lanka, it is lost in Indian ocean. Then, 2nd lie, Rama setu is a replica, the real Nala Setu is lost in Indian Ocean. 3rd lie, Vibishana has died. Vibishana that met Sahadeva during Mahabharata is some other Vibishana, not Ravana's brother. He ignores the fact that Vibishana is a chiranjeevi (immortal). I can give you a list of many more of his fraud. Ramayana is real, people like this fraud here is the ones that bastardise Itihasa for personal gains. That should tell you the quality of this podcast. Ranveer is know as pseudoscience mascot of India for a reason.

@ruwanfonseka

Ай бұрын

Ellawala Medhananda Thero from Sri Lanka explains about the words Seetha Eliya - means සීත එලිය (Seetha means cold) , Ravana - means නාද කරන්නා (i.e. one who makes a noise), Seethawaka - සීත වක (Seetha means cold) all these names have nothing to do with Ravana or Seetha that is mentioned in the Indian Ramayana Epic.

Ravan was taking shivling from kailash to Lanka, but was intercepted in Gokarna (coastal Karnataka). So his Lanka was near Maldives

@ravindurajapakse7270

2 ай бұрын

There is a ancient port in srilanka called Gorkanna

@venkateshu8715

2 ай бұрын

@@ravindurajapakse7270 oh really....

@venkateshu8715

2 ай бұрын

@@ravindurajapakse7270 ya I saw on Google. It's said that at gokarna in Karnataka, lord Ganesha intercepted Ravan. And the shivlinga is in a temple here

@maheshhm7189

2 ай бұрын

nilesh oak had told south India including nasik was ruled by ravana then gokarn is part of south India

Pls Remove the name ( ADAMS BRIDGE )

What the hell he is talking about

Ramayana is mythical yet repetitive story which existed in every society in many forms. Then, why does it matter, where is lanka. It's just a debate of fools.😂

@MrStoic-

Ай бұрын

😂😂 control

Dear All, please dont believe Archeogists who have distorted history in all means. Archeology its self is an aspect of colonial beuracracy in modern times. If you want to who you are, where you are from and your history, go back in time. Push yourself to record your own history of your grandparents and beyond till it all connects. What is not printed is written, what is not written is carved and the truth is carved on stone. India was not india when this all happened, Bharath was not Bharath when this all happened. And Sri Lanka wasnt Sri Lanka when this all happened. Modern day Sri Lanka has carved history for more than 125000 years. The well kept secret of modern time. The great city of Atlantis, known as Atalankawa. Sri Lanka was always known as a Dweepa and every 5000 years during several Buddhas' and Rawanas' times it was known as Ojadweepa, Mandadweepa, Waradweepà & now Lankadweepa. Remember that Rawana is a lineage and a glorious position not a King. There were several sakwithi names as Ravanas Maha Tharu, Maha Bali, Maha Manu, Maha Siva, Maha Ravulu. In the story of Ramayana its one of these Ravanas who dealt with and definitely not the one Valmiki wrote of. Rama and Ravanas are all of one kingdom its all one but unfortunately modern India looks for its glory from distorted history. History will be written where the global geopolitical power is formed from. So be it. But remember Truth will win. We from Lanka are the sons of light, the Ravanas the greatest of Asuras who only adore the Sun, Moon and the Dharma. To sum up, dont believe what's written trust what is carved. Read, see and realise and you will see everything clear. Just an advice; least from this year stop burning our king (Ravanadhahan), stop celebrating cremation of our princes Holika (holi festival) & finally stop celebrating the burn of the Lanka (Deepawali) Its a pity to note a country's national festivals revolve upon destruction of a great civilization. In relation to this video , ive got nothing much to say. Words are spoken. Just beware of Karma.

😂😂

Not convincing theory.

Yes Absolutely what Nilesh oak sir Said is True 💯. We have to dig deep to know what is real and what is fake. Sinhala dweepa(Srilanka) is not Ravana Lanka. And the Present structure between Bhārat and Simhala dweepa is not Real Rāma Sethu these are facts as per Vālmiki Rāmāyana, Padma Mahapurana. This present structure is only 30-40km long. 100yojanas ≠ 40km. 1yojana = 13km approximately. So 1300km is 100yojanas. Where is the 1300km between Bhārat and Simhala dweepa?? You might say Simhala might be way more far away once upon a time. No! Even in Continental drifting, both Bhārat and Simhala dweepa travelled together with same distance. Both are not in different tectonic plates, both lies on the same Indian tectonic plate. In Padma Mahapurana it's clearly mentioned that Ramasethu was destroyed by Sri Rama himself for Vibhishana. This is truth. I know many Hindus still believe that present structure as Ramasethu But it's fake.

@bhavishdhankar1943

Ай бұрын

Vibhasana was big devotee of Ram । how he can destroy the bridge that passionately link his devotion toward Ram ।

@viswanadhgowrisankar4679

Ай бұрын

@@bhavishdhankar1943 It's not like that. Vibhishana And his race was Rakshasa right. They are not humans. So he don't want Upcoming puny human generations entering Lanka and his kingdom.

Ravana is sri lankan king

@MAYUR600

2 ай бұрын

lol says who RAVANA was lankan king sri lanka was called as SINHALA

@CricketfanGood

2 ай бұрын

@@MAYUR600 Yes, 90% of times in the past Sri Lanka used the name Sinhala Deepaya for our country, but we have also used the name Lanka. In our country there are almost Vibhishana temples. And Ravana Falls is in our Sri Lanka

@MAYUR600

2 ай бұрын

@@CricketfanGood Having temples doesnot quantify that it was RAVANA'S LANKA Hanuman flow 100 YOJANAS(880 km) FROM INDIA to reach ravana lanka , lol remind me how far is lanka from Rameshwaram ? Vanarsena litreally could cros with single jump

@Princessalishia

2 ай бұрын

@@MAYUR600Sinhala is a language,not a country 😂

@MAYUR600

2 ай бұрын

@@Princessalishia lol sinhala was originated from simhala dweepa ..lol

Original name of sri 0:03 Lanka is sinhala dweepa i e sinhalese island. Sri Lankans don't believe in ramayana stories as these are myths. Ramayana is a old poems originated in north India. Ramayana has no reference to sri Lanka. Or sri Lankan history books don't have any references to ramayana.

@penguinsofindia4754

2 ай бұрын

Lanka is different Sri Lanka is not lanka

@ikrupa882

2 ай бұрын

Write this to a note. Wrap that note and insert i your back.

Kuch bhi…

Ranveer easily mentioning "Extreme right wing portals" tag for who people who believe in ram sethu is not acceptable. As a host You definitely need to do more research on how to use proper phrases and word, this bluffing or blatant use of words should STOP.

Myths

This man is a Psycho seen....

What’s this guesswork and speculation. 🤪 no proof , just hypothesis

🧢

Nonsense talks.........

@digvijaysinghbhandari7168

Ай бұрын

How?

There exists a place called Lanka in Assam..This place is known for its Tantric activities..

@skipper2594

2 ай бұрын

is assam an island

@abhijitgoswami9583

2 ай бұрын

​@@skipper2594Don't u know?

@skipper2594

2 ай бұрын

@@abhijitgoswami9583 Iknow .but you have to have common sense

@abhijitgoswami9583

2 ай бұрын

@@skipper2594 Don't put your nose in others business.

PERHAPS HES IDEAS COMING FROM CARTOONS

@tomalkirttonia1609

2 ай бұрын

Man, he is talking based on original valmiki ramayan text

Joot Joot

Kumari Kandam and Lemuria?

@skipper2594

2 ай бұрын

kumari kandam and lemuria both are same thing and its just a fantasy propaganda of south indians , used to political advantages by improving nationalism and south indian supremism over north

@indiabharatshakthi

2 ай бұрын

Tamil fantasy

@user-ib2dq7ev5n

2 ай бұрын

That's actually not possible..

Ye banda Bakwaas ko dursa naam bangaya hai. Bhai kya rameswaram temple bi jhoota hai. kya kuch bhi. pagaal bano par banao maat.

Yes if that was Sri lanka 🇱🇰, there should have be any proofs or evidences for ramayan in Sri Lanka.😂 but people have no proofs just praise Sri Lanka.. I think lanka was tamil nadu and south india at that time.not sri lanka.

@diagocooray9884

2 ай бұрын

Learn more dosa kid😂.there are so many proofs in Sri Lanka for that 😂

@Jaylio

2 ай бұрын

Lanka an island how could it have been Tamil Nadu? 😂

@skipper2594

2 ай бұрын

@@Jaylio tamils like to make up stories and be proud 😂dont care

@ruwanfonseka

Ай бұрын

@@diagocooray9884 Ellawala Medhananda Thero from Sri Lanka explains about the place names that have the words Seetha Eliya - means සීත එලිය (Seetha means cold) , Ravana - means නාද කරන්නා (i.e. one who makes a noise), Seethawaka - සීත වක (Seetha means cold) all these names have nothing to do with Ravana or Seetha that is mentioned in the Indian Ramayana Epic.

It looks like you two chaps have taken leave of your senses and you are not even a historian This man is a liar I agree wholeheartedly with my fellow Sri Lankans who commented Your have no right to talk about our history You should get a knowledgeable historian from Sri Lanka and then discuss this subject Stop talking nonsense

@EkaSanatani

2 ай бұрын

Do Sri Lankans agree that Ravana's Lanka is Sri Lanka? Are they proud of the association? I hear stories that they are trying to get rid of that association. Are these unfounded rumors?

@ruwanfonseka

Ай бұрын

@@EkaSanatani Ellawala Medhananda Thero from Sri Lanka explains about the place names that have the words Seetha Eliya - means සීත එලිය (Seetha means cold) , Ravana - means නාද කරන්නා (i.e. one who makes a noise), Seethawaka - සීත වක (Seetha means cold) all these names have nothing to do with Ravana or Seetha that is mentioned in the Indian Ramayana Epic.

What nonsense is he talking

@gaurav-fh4mi

2 ай бұрын

@linin1899 plz enlighten the race of humans then with your "sense"

@basilgeorge9957

2 ай бұрын

Uncle is high on vodka

@diagocooray9884

2 ай бұрын

Then whats the truth you think ?.( just a question 🤔 )

@7777777sunil

2 ай бұрын

Listen to his complete podcast.....he makes sense and he provided the evidence for most part

@venuvelpula5481

2 ай бұрын

Do you know the answer then? . what the archeologist is saying correct. If Ramasetu was 100 yojanas long as. If 1 yojana=11kms that would make 1100kms from rameshwaram,but srilanka is just 50kms from rameshwaram, we don’t need Hanuman to jump for 50kms.The distance 110kms that is why Only Hanuman travelled long. Please read Valmiki Ramayana

What nonsense…….useless

Konsa company ka expiry dated ganja leta hai ye 😂

@rakeshgogoi5158

2 ай бұрын

Atleast they are doing Research on that😎 , what about you😂 Srilanka is just a mainland of that time and there may be other bigger islands too which may submerged because of War or oceanic Earthquake zone 😎