Leica is amazing. I always lend my M3 to friends who wanted to try it out, and always get a free roll of film back because nobody remembered to take off the lens cap.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Ha ha love it :)

Watching this back a second time it’s evident that, in this era of do everything cameras, there are fewer photographers that are able to appreciate what the Leica M inspires, the “D” bodies in particular. When I switched to Sony from Canon several years ago I was enamored with the ridiculous AF algorithms, exposure zebras, etc. The camera did everything for me. Leica M returns me to my film days, when I had to think, and every shot mattered. Just two years ago I thought the M-D and M10-D were a silly proposition. Now, the M-D is the only M I use. It’s an evolution.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

The funny part is how people think I"m completely BS'ing about it, I use it so much and I truly love it. If I didn't love or believe what I"m saying I would spend time making this episode and more importantly I wouldn't use the camera. I'm happy to hear people can relate, it's a shame the discontinued the D :(.

@azadpeymaparham

2 жыл бұрын

@@AskMOTT your love for Leica is very understandable. A simple camera is much more intimate than a feature-packed camera. I totally understand that but the price is not justifiable. M10 or M11 are more expensive than any other high-end camera but they have less features. I'm not after a camera that's packed with features but a camera with less features is also cheaper to manufacture then why is the Leica cameras so expensive?

@donjagoe

5 ай бұрын

Exactly!

@clawdawg7248

5 ай бұрын

@@azadpeymaparham 1. They are assembled by hand by employees making a living wage. 2. They are made with premium materials. 3. The rangefinder component is very complex; its production costs alone are higher than most cameras. 3. Words like “justifiable” or “worth it” have different meanings to different people; inspiration comes into play here. 4. My belief is Leica Ms have a longer useable life than other camera brands due to not being compelled to upgrade to the latest and greatest AF / AI / fps specs. I regularly spent more over a 5 year period with Canon/Sony models than I have with the Leica brand.

Great video. Very interesting. I have a q2 and am blown away by it. For the same reasons you discuss. I just love to shoot with it and it’s simplicity. Your photos are incredible.

There was an saying in the Old West…”beware the man with a single shot rifle, he probably knows how to use it”.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Ha ha, I love that.

@adyshih

3 жыл бұрын

Leica actually had issued a rifle like camera that the trigger is the shutter Justin should get one of those rare rifle Leica...

Great video. You explain why Leicas work for you from the perspective of how they allow you to do your work with the least ‘interference’ possible which is what really matters. As you say, when you’re shooting professionally there are so many factors to consider that you need cameras to get out of the way and let you focus on all the other stuff apart from gear. shoot sport for a living and although it’s different to what you do, the same principles apply. I’m not a Leica guy, but after watching your video I totally get why you are.

I’m extremely fortunate in that I bought my Leica lenses new just before the millennium. They were merely expensive then as opposed to eye watering.

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

I wish I'd done the same Tom. I did have a Leica M6 many moons ago and it was pretty affordable.

@gurugamer8632

2 жыл бұрын

Which lens? 😉

@Tom_YouTube_stole_my_handle

2 жыл бұрын

@@gurugamer8632 Me or Justin? I have the 35mm Summilux and the 50mm Summicron. My 35 is the pre FLE version. Before that I did have the Leitz Canada version of the 35 which sad to say was a fairly poor performer. Luckily for me it was stolen along with my first M6.

@gurugamer8632

2 жыл бұрын

@@Tom_KZread_stole_my_handle how did it get stolen and where?

@Tom_YouTube_stole_my_handle

2 жыл бұрын

@@gurugamer8632 There was a targeted burglary at home. Pretty much the only thing that was taken.

Totally get it Justin. Thanks for making the point that content, ideas and many more things matters than the fancy tech. Your approach to photographing and choosing your tools goes beyond it’s Leica or any other brands.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you Ho Sze, nice to hear some postive Leica comments, I'm getting killed on some other sites over my Leica justification :). I appreciate you taking the time to say something nice.

I’ve shot whole weddings with one Leica body and one lens. And, like you, I got one for personal use, but it wound up as my main for professional use.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

I love to hear that Alfred, most people would be too scared to shoot a wedding with Leica but if you know what you're doing and your patient enough you can have fantastic results.

@mattroberts1267

Жыл бұрын

Same! (Not weddings, but I shoot product full time) I bought an older Leica to have for fun, and it soon replaced the Nikon d810 I was using at work. It just nails colors really well and requires way less editing time.

Hey Justin. Can you please talk about how you insure your equipment against theft or damage. Thank you.

I really like your videos. As an autistic adult getting into photography and trying to learn. What i like most is that you don’t use music and you keep it very simple. I don’t have a Leica camera but i just like sit down after my kids are gone to bed and learn about photography. Keep up the great videos. Love from Ireland 🇮🇪

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you Andrew and thanks for saying where you live, i love when people do that. I hope to take my camera and my bike and ride through Ireland in the fall sometime, bucket list. I offer one on one classes if you're ever interested in that kind of learning as well. www.justinmott.com/bookme-online-store

Nicely presented. I agree with everything. It always makes me want to take photos and I never get bored with it.

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and commenting Catherine.

Excellent debate, Justin. A clear set of reasons why it works for you, and quite possibly others. Have just embarked on my Leica journey, I have really enjoyed the simplicity and renewed focus I have on making photos. Not to mention the excellent photos the M body produces!

Justin - Great video (even without a blue or orange light on a shelf behind you!). I have been shooting Leica M digital cameras for years now. About 45 years ago, I fell in love with photography using a Pentax K1000 - it had an aperture ring, shutter speed dial, you set the ASA based on the film you were shooting, and it had a meter that was a simple needle (if it was pointing up you were overexposed, down you were underexposed). From there, I moved to Nikons (F3, F5, and then D300, and D4). Digital cameras work, but the experience for me was distracting. For many of the reasons you articulated so very well, I transitioned to Leica M bodies (after considering a few of Fujiflim's offerings). I never looked back. They work for me. I love them. They may not work for someone else and they may hate them - no big deal. I shoot more now in a month than I did in a year when shooting DSLRs - and I enjoy every minute of it. That's why I shoot them. End of story ... now go get you some blue lights and a shelf (and a Black Pro Mist filter).

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing your story Rick, love to hear people's journey with photography and with their equipment. I won't cave, I won't cave, I promise ::). I'll be sprucing up the filming area but I'm going to do it my way, I promise :).

I came across this video whilst browsing KZread. - I came from a world of Canon 5Ds, via Fuji XT to Leica M240 then M10. I also have the awesome Q. As you say all you need to set the ISO, Shutter speed and Aperture - that's all. Now I've found your channel I am going to watch them all. Thanks Justin

My change came about thanks to a very generous gift from my younger brother. We'd both grown up shooting and processing our own B&W film from the late 70's onwards with both of us initially using Nikon FMs when they came out. Over the years my brother stuck withes and I ended up with a Sony A7RM3 which I spent most of my time menu diving. All my life I'd harped on about wanting a Leica and how I missed the simplicity of the old FM so he bought me an M10! Since then the Sony is hardly ever used, a Leica M2 has been added and when people ask me why I'm shooting Leica instead of the Sony I just reply "cos just picking it up makes me smile." I've even stopped metering now, preferring to use sunny 16 instead, I find it extremely accurate even indoors and using it lets you understand and get to know the light around you.

John, Thanks for sharing your experiences with Leica...glad to find your channel. I am an amateur photographer and being retired travel plenty, {except covid stopped our traveling) We got out of Venice/Milan Jan 22, 2020, when I read about the pandemic, in that travel I carried an M10 and Sony A7RIV. I started carrying Leica in 1970, with a used CIII, then paired with with Voightlander and then a Mamiya rangefinders, the CIII had color slides while the other camera had Panx or Trix. Then I shifted to Nikkormat and Leica M3, late 80s to Nikon electronic shutter and 2000 to Canon DSLRs, the pair by 2010 were the 5D2 and 7D, made,first day order to Sony A7R 6 years ago and to the Leica M10 in 2017, getting my copy in June, upgraded the Sony to the A7R4 August of 2019. While on lockdown, I find that I carry the M10 around my city leaving the A7RIV at home. Looking forward to traveling again with the Leica M10, the 50 yr old Elmarit 28 from the M3, stays most of the time (may get a newer 35 mm) , with 50mm, 90mm (seldom do I use the 135, and Voightlander 15) as the main camera, maybe just bring the smaller classic A7R as backup with THE 16-35 mm. The A7RIV with long lenses will be for airshows, astrophotography, etc. Subscribed to your channel.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and for sharing your Leica journey Antonio, love to hear it. Hope you get to travel soon with your Leica, I know I can’t wait to be on the road.

Everything you said justifies the purchase of any cheap camera (if you want the minimalism DSLR can't offer, there's the a7c or even Fuji if you're into the retro style), but it doesn't justify the purchase of 2 bodies for 12k

@jockturner1547

3 жыл бұрын

Hey doesn't need to justify his purchases to anyone... For him the lack of features provide value and if you look at the photos he is getting they are fantastic so clearly it works for him.

@bartjandebruijn1567

3 жыл бұрын

Literally his first argument is that he wants gear to slow him down by lacking bells and whistles. While I agree that old Fuji gear might be that, the newer stuff definitely isn't in my experience. I shoot a LOT and often overshoot.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

@@jockturner1547 you said what I was going to say, thank Jock.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

@@bartjandebruijn1567 glad someone actually hears what I’m saying Bartjan, thanks :)

Another way to look at the cost, if you own this camera for 3 years (156 weeks), it will cost approx. $52.00 a week. If you intend to sell it, then the 'rental' cost is about half or more as Leica's second hand value is usually great.

Really a great video Justin! I can understand your love to these beautiful M cameras. You look through the viewfinder, you hold it in your hands and you love it immediately. I use the M10-D for most of my portraiture work and it works very good. Maybe not every photo is perfect, but I am overwhelmed by the results. Keep on going…..

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Well said Quirin, it’s great to hear other people having a similar experience w the M10D. It’s a special camera indeed.

Just about everything you said is the same logic and self-convincing I used to buy a $300, 15 year old, 12 megapixel Canon 5D classic. The simple, minimalistic and straightforward menu system is calming. Image quality straight out of camera is terrific. Battery life is awesome. Throw on some vintage m42 glass! It's great. Twelve big megapixels seem more than enough. So everything you said makes perfect sense.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

That’s awesome , I did love the original 5D and I put a lot of miles on that camera until it finally died after human error using it w an underwater camera bag that wasn’t sealed properly.

@mr_x1703

3 жыл бұрын

still sad that i sold queen mum 7 years ago :(

@Chris-ey7zy

3 жыл бұрын

Just bought and returned one for 200. Decided it’s too heavy for me. I’m spoiled by mirrorless

@stockyard_cle

3 жыл бұрын

@@AskMOTT Damn. She died too young.

@stockyard_cle

3 жыл бұрын

@@Chris-ey7zy It is certainly heavy. Especially with this Tamron 35mm I keep on it now.

I was offered a Leica M3 Double Stroke with a 35mm f1.4 Summilux for a significant discount from a fellow photographer who needed cash fast. I used it over a trial weekend and passed on it and for the same money bought a killer couple of newly released Nikon FM2 bodies and lenses. I don't regret that decision at all.

Justin: You are speaking about the camera as a tool, I have mirrorless because can use the vintage lenses of Canon, Voightlander, and many German Zebra on my body. I have many M Mount lenses and love the rangefinder glass for the color and tactile input, you think about your work... I am pleased that there is a person half my age , I am 60 ...that understands the knowing of the tactile and human touch and input photography. Yes: most people are caught in the great chase of ever evolving gear. I choose a different path.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

I'm on old soul Chris ha ha. Actually, I wish I thought of these things when I was younger and I wouldn't have slipped discs in my lower back and neck. I noticed so many popular KZread photography channels out there that are all about getting you to buy whatever is new and flashy. Thanks for watching and thanks for taking the time to comments, it's nice to know people are finally watching these videos I'm making :).

Thank you Justin, you hit the proverbial nail on the head. It's all about fit and having the right tool (for each of us) for the job. At some point, I will pick up an M-10 variant, more because I have always wanted a Leica than anything else, having started with my dad's Agfa Ambi Silette and three lenses. I know that it won't replace my Olympus M43 kit that I use for commercial, portrait and motorsports, but it doesn't need to. A craftsman is one who uses his (or hers) tools to their best advantage, and you do an amazing job! Thanks for the continuing inspiration!

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching Stan and thanks for taking time time to comment, I appreciate that. Let me know how it goes when you get your M10 :).

@MrSpiff9

3 жыл бұрын

@@AskMOTT will do sir! In the meantime, my trusty Olympus Pen-F will have to hold me over until the jobs coming in can subsidize it!

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrSpiff9 Fair enough :).

Great video upload... and I am so glad you made the point about cost effectiveness....

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks John, I don’t feel enough people consider the lack of need to upgrade = savings.

I found you through your "Hasselblad X1D System | A Professional's Review" video and appreciate your presentation and content. Subscribed. Slapped the like button. Smashed the notification bell. Commented. Doing my part.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

I appreciate that so much , more videos coming soon :).

Watching Leica videos don’t cost me a thing. I’ll do it over and over again!

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

I actually send out invoices Sakir, trying out a new strategy to afford my next Leica purchase.

Great philosophy, beautiful images. 😄 A great system to get into.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you Wayne, the kind words help offset all the Leica hate ha ha.

I agree 100% with you. More than 50 years ago, I started with a Minolta SRT 101 with a 57/1.7 and added on a 28/2.8 to later. When I became professional, I used the Minoltas for 30 years (still have them), but now I'm on an M-P240 with the 50 LUX and a Q for wide angle. That works for me, as your set-up works for you. I can pull out some R-lenses, but that's less than once a month. Press photography is to get close to your subject.

@jasongold6751

10 ай бұрын

what benefits! I own a M3 to M6. A canon AE1P a way better investment. The best? Your phone!

Low key area is fine Justin....as a short time Vietnam expat, your room is perfect.

I liked your why, and when you said: "this thing takes photos". Turn on, then three steps: iso, aperture, shutter speed, MF, and then shutter button. I think you talking about being a photographer. That's how I was in love when I started whit my grandfather's old camera a Zeiss Icon.

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

I always love hearing stories like this Sebastiano of generations passing down camera to the next and carrying on a family love for photography.

Some honest and very valid arguments. Your video is so much better than the typical youtube photographer's Leica video: "The Leica, it has magic, you have to experience it to believe it, it takes pictures that no other camera can, it instantly makes you a better photographer..."

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for saying that , I speak form real use and my experience and I don’t think everyone will have the same experience as I do :)

I really like the way you pointed out that when you’re out shooting, your energy is focused on the environment/subject(s) and not on the camera and its settings. Btw, I love your office space. I would love to hear more about why you chose Hanoi as your base. Thanks as always 👏🏾

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks Gary, I launched my career in Hanoi starting as a curious young documentary photographer/traveler of sorts and then transitioning into an assignment photographer for the NewYork Times.

I appreciate your honesty. I've said similar things on forums and gotten savaged by those who say just don't use the features. As you say, it's not that simple to get a simpler experience.

You are clearly a very accomplished photographer and the animal pictures really struck a chord with me. I use Leica m for landscapes, obviously an unusual choice, but I put simplicity and reliability above all else. People chase the latest camera like they chase the latest phone, all suckered in by the marketing hype.

Excellent points made in this video. I sold all my mirrored Nikon equipment to go mirrorless with the Sony ecosystem. Now I think I’m going to sell my Sony equipment to go into Leica. I’m really interested in the Leica Q2 monochrome.

@AskMOTT

Жыл бұрын

Thanks Rocky, I'm currently testing out the Q2 Monochrom so perhaps I can offer you some insight once the video is done.

Hi, new viewer and new subscriber here - I just discovered your channel on my Recommended Page. I thoroughly enjoyed listening to your philosophy behind using your Leica camera. It made me consider my own shortcomings as a photographer - that I have a tendency to overshoot - and I feel inspired to simplify my kit and be more present in the moment of whatever I'm shooting. I don't have nearly enough money to shoot on a Leica, but I can at least start with flipping down the screen on my Fuji X-T4 haha!

Last year I decided to move in that direction and bought a Voigtländer Ultron 40mm for my Nikon D750 (my Leica substitute). That lens exceeded my expectation and I have hardly mounted another lens on that camera body since I got that gem. This has made my photographic experience more simplistic and enjoyable.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

That's great to hear Helgi, thanks for taking the time to comment and share your story with me. I've heard good things about those Voigtlander lenses, but I've never tried them personally.

I agree with all of these opinions. I was dissatisfied with other systems. They didn’t inspire me. I felt buried under options. I bought a second hand M10 (with my wife’s blessing) knowing if it didn’t agree I could on sell for very little loss if any. I love 1) having no settings I don’t need 2) creating a relationship with a camera that I plan on using for 5-10 years 3) I love 50mm and this is the ideal body for that focal length IMHO. I’m lucky to have the means and live in a city with a good used market.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing your story Greg, I had to get my wife’s blessing as well for the Leica M10D :)

I'm a photographer that uses $100 LG cell phone camera. I want a Leica. But I can't make the mental leap from $100 to $10,000.

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

Whatever works for you and saves money :)

As a Leica shooter on both film and digital, I agree with everything you say except for the hassle of post production with film. If you have a lab you like, like Richard Photo Lab in LA, there is no post; all you do is cull the scans you get back and tweak a bit if necessary. They’ll work with you to develop a scan profile (or you can use another photographer’s profile) and deliver scans that are consistent to it. Voila-no post!

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

I hear you , I just know myself and I know I’m not patient so all my patience is reserved for shooting. I wish I was more crafty and more patient for film :)

After hearing about the Leica stuff for a few years I finally broke down and rented the Q2 Monochrom...hands down the best shooting experience I have ever had. Definitely has me want to shoot more Leica and more pure BW. Great video.

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

That’s great to hear Jaime, it’s a pretty incredible all around camera.

Honestly, I’m committed enough to photography to consider Leica… and I’ve certainly had my share of manual cameras before (including Hasselblad). But in recent years I’ve come to the conclusion that tech like IBIS really contributes to critical sharpness of images in the low light settings I favour. I just can’t see the cost/benefit from Leica glass, given that I’d never achieve its full benefit in these scenarios.

@newsigmundfreud3023

2 жыл бұрын

The Leica is a statues expression, illusion and just in the head thing. Capable cameras like Sony, Fuji, Canon .. are so much more reality useful.

You right about simplicity, I have a brand that has more buttons that I need it, I love Leica and I am saving money for the LS2 thanks bro for sharing

After deciding to finally get a good camera, I shopped, and shopped, and finally decided on a Leica SL 601 for many of the reasons you describe here. Yeah it was more expensive, but not having to go through a 50 page manual was worth it ;-). Also, is that a Leitz Wetzlar Elmar 135mm f4 I spied there for a second?

I like your thought processes.

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you Terry.

As a new Leica shooter with a M240 and small primes I love the simpicity of the system and operation during use. I would like to pickup an M-D in the near future. Great video...

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you , you’ll either love or hate the M10D :), I love it

It's true that I didn't really appreciate the allure of a Leica until I got my hands on one and started using it. All you need to do is hold it in your hands and focus with the viewfinder to respect the design and quality. I'm not very excited about the picture quality of my M10, but it's useable. The dynamic range is narrow and it's very easy to blow highlights. I set it at -1 EV, and that works for quick grab-and-go shooting. I'm not willing to spend more than $5000 on any camera though.

I like your analysis. In photography always things that works for someone they just don’t works for another one. The thing is sometimes we forget to use what makes us more productive and happy for something that we believe (for wrong) as better. For me Leica has lost its old character. Today it’s hard for anyone to pay so much money for a camera that falls behind in almost every single way even from entry level full frame bodies. I mean, it doesn’t makes sense. Still, I understand your need for simplicity. But I will drop another thought to the table; what if Leica (say M10 or even SL2) was priced equally to the rival cameras (Sony, Nikon, Canon) at about 2000-3000$? In my opinion, it would have been destroyed. And, I know, the lenses has a character, the build quality is stellar and the ergonomics are fine, but nowadays every high end camera is built well, all pro level lenses (especially Canon L series) has amazing sharpness and color rendition and their ergonomics are great, and the most important, for less than half the price! So, no, the price by itself is not the only problem for the most people. The key thing is the fact that Leica sees all photographers as documentary or street photographers. That’s maybe good for Leica because anyway has its audience but for the rest of us (landscape, wildlife or even hobbyists) there are better options.

@azadpeymaparham

2 жыл бұрын

I'm a street photographer but can't justify paying that much money for a M10 or M11. It just doesn't make sense. If it was appropriately priced, then I would buy a Leica in a heartbeat because it has a lot of unique advantages for street photography but with that price.... nope!

Great video. Thank you. I’m still astonished of how many fall into the “I’ve gotta have a M6”. I have both the M6 and M4-2 and find the M4-2 superior.

Beautiful images you've got there...

I got a Cl a few weeks ago and I love it… working with black and white.. Got a m42 adapter and loving using it with vintage lenses… yipee..

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Right on , great to hear :)

Like you i used many brands out there and my answer is i never had the same feeling shooting any camera like Leica and i just love it absolutely love it and you can’t put a price on that

Great and noble work you do!❤

I owned a near mint M4 for a while (sold it as I needed one with a 0.58 finder since I wear glasses) and as someone who owns top of the range Nikon equipment and a Hasselblad 501c/m I can honestly say that the Leica was the most beautiful piece of engineering I have ever held. The tension of the winder and shutter was as if it had come off the line yesterday and not 50 years ago! Everything about it - the build and feel is just perfect.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

I had a 501 as well Robert , but I’m not big into film, wish I had more patience for developing.

@robcanis

3 жыл бұрын

@@AskMOTT Worth the perseverance, Justin :)

Noticed your photo on a postcard at the Las Vegas Leica store. Good job.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

So random Daniel, love to hear it :). The more people that learn about the northern white rhino rhino situation the better.

Try Fuji. It's even easier to use. I have both Leica and Fuji and I actually prefer to use the Fuji, though in the end I prefer the images from my SL/Voigtlander combo. They just work together so well and produce characterful images. But for someone who likes simplicity Fuji is the best option.

You nailed it! I bought an M3 in 1967 and it was used but like new with a 50mm Summilux. Sadly I sold it and built up a Leicaflex outfit. Had I kept it I could now sell it for what I paid in real terms. Imagine - I could have owned a Leica for 50+ years for free! I wish Nikon etc would bring out a Digital camera with No movie, No menu system, limited ISO with the possibility of going down to 10 with good quality, manual focusing and aperture setting but good TTL Spot metering and solid build. A dream of course as no manufacturer would take the risk.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you Gareth, I'd love to see that M3. Perhaps Canon will make a simple minimalistic camera to counter Leica for making the SL2 ha ha.

I'm using a Leica a bit below in the heirarchy from your camera. But the control is amazing, the build quality is amazing, and I love the photos and videos I get. It's also much more small and portable than my "good" camera. I once had a Panasonic equivalent of the same camera. The differences were obvious in the quality and the ease of use. The Panasonic is more usable remotely, but that is its only advantage.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Great to hear from a fellow Leica user, and thank you for the kind words and taking the time to comment :).

i absolutely love your project!

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you Manuel, more stories coming soon hopefully :)

Great video; inspirational - thanks.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks so much

You know what else isn’t weighing me down? My $400 used Fuji Xe2 with a 27mm f2.8. It’s a wonderful combo, and incredibly affordable (compared to these)

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Fair enough, that’s a nice set up and if it works for you that’s great on the wallet.

This video expresses very well the practical benefits of Leica and after wasting an enormous amount of money on other systems I now have, for me, my final perfect camera. I use a Leica Q, the most economical way into the Leica system, for street and architecture I can live with the 28mm lens and I love the quality and simplicity. I also have a Leica c-lux, for occasional architectural details, but with its overly complicated Panasonic menu and lack of DNG raw, there is no way that it even remotely resembles a real Leica, except for the red dot, which I cover up anyway.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Love to hear that Ronald, I cover my dot too so the bling argument is wasted on us :).

Fully agree, I just bought an mp240 & summicron 50 and couldn’t be happier for the next few years

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Love to hear that Kieran, thanks for watching :). I’m considering swapping out my 75mm for a 50mm, nothing wrong w the 75 but the 50 suits me better.

I have a ‘lowly’ TL2 with the 23mm f2 and it’s a complete dream to use. I’ve had all sorts of cameras from old film Canon F1’s to Pentax k1000’s, etc. I currently have Pentax k1ll and k01 in my gear bag, but I constantly find myself reaching for the TL2. Just something so relaxing and carefree when using it instead of feeling like I “have” to work hard for whatever I’m Doing. I consider my Pentax’s as my work horses. My leica’s (have an x2 also) are my fashion cameras. There’s just something that makes it feel like the pictures just came from some GQ or ELLE shoot. Like you said, they make me also feel like I can just slow down and focus on the things that made me fall in love with photography so many years ago. The thing with the prices…I used to think that Leica are expensive. There’s no doubts about it. They ARE. But then I started thinking about it…most people that buy Leica equipment keep them for life, or for many years at a minimum. How much money would people spend that typically go buy the newest, latest greatest Sony, Canikon, etc setups every other year? In the end, it equals out or is actually cheaper to just pay up front and get the Leica. EDIT- I just got to the part of your video where you took the words right out of my mouth about the updates, etc lol. Seems we’re on the the same page with that

The only limitation the M has is the 135. Other then that it’s only in your head. I have always compared my gear to the photographers of the old days were they carried plates around and produced iconic images. If you know what you want to shoot you can. I shoot sport with it , where’s the issue? Dial it in and off you go. You don’t need 600mm. 90 is just fine just learn to anticipate and how to get close no matter what. I got a few lenses since they come out for need and purpose but use 24 as standard and 80% workhorse. That means 1.5m is what’s on the scale, around that I’ll dial in what needs to match that but that parameter is solid. Crazy? Nope, experience! Good luck for the next projects Juzzy

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks Mario, totally agree. It's funny how people look at me in the "Wildlife community" when I shop with my Leica M kit and only a few lenses, they think I don't know what I'm doing at all. Thanks for watching and for taking the time to comment.

Why Leica... Less is more. Slows you down (many non-Leica users don't get this one) Just love your "review" or, to be accurate, tips on optimising the Leicas to one's personal style. Thanks for this video; very useful to Leica newbies or non-newbies who've laid off shooting those Leicas for a while like me.

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

My pleasure , thanks for taking the time to comment.

The beauty of a 50MP camera is the ability to crop down and still get a high quality image.

@johnvanderploeg

3 жыл бұрын

I second that!

@jroviraphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Mm not really but ok.. the beauty of it is the resolution and be able to process and print a high quality image. If you have to crop a bit that’s cool but shooting with cropping in mind doesnt improve your photography

@johnvanderploeg

3 жыл бұрын

@@jroviraphoto I don’t disagree with you, but not all compositions are 3:2, if you want to do anything else you have to crop. Also, in some genres of photography, take wildlife photography for instance, cropping is very common, so it really depends on your use case as well.

@jroviraphoto

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnvanderploeg I agree.. but with wildlife photography I would focus more on the zoom ability and compression rather than cropping it. Cropping it wont give you more compression which is key in those scenarios. Same thing with street photography.. you cant walk around with a 28mm or 35mm and shoot 50-60 feet away from a scene and then crop.. you have to be close to your subjects. Not picking on you, this is just something I see a lot with photographers. Cheers.

@johnvanderploeg

3 жыл бұрын

@@jroviraphoto I agree with you about street photography, but if you shot wildlife more you’d realize wild animals don’t always let you walk right up to them. On a full frame 600mm is too short for small birds and animals a lot of the time. Believe me cropping is essential.

Great video, thank you!

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching.

Superb photos and good analytical video on my favorite brand. I began with Leica because 90 years ago there was nothing else that would produce the contrast available from the rare earth components of the German lenses. This was many decades before anyone talked about "systems" or "workflow." The marketers insist that I should upgrade my amazing first generation 35mm Summicron by breaking the bank for the current Apo Summicron. This would not offer any remarkable improvement to my photos. It would of course sustain the incomes of the marketers. This seems to be the unspoken intention behind the majority of photo vids on KZread. This one is a happy exception.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

I appreciate that Jeremy, I don't know why I'm surprised but every time I make a video about Leica I do it from the heart but inevitably I get so much flack and anger over the brand. Oh well, it works for me and for you and for many other for various reasons and that's all that matters. Thanks for taking time to write something nice, I appreciate that.

I've been shooting with Nikon DSLRs for many years, always using them much the same way I used (and continue to use) my Nikon FE and FM2 and Leica M6 film bodies - that is, in a very basic, simple manner, in manual or aperture priority mode, rarely using the menu and rarely chimping, all allowing me to remain 100% focused on the subject and the lighting. In other words, I use my current digital cameras much the same way I use my old film cameras - relying pretty much solely on the four basic image making adjustments - shutter speed, aperture, ISO (ASA), and focus (manual or auto). Just because the bells and whistles of modern cameras are there, it doesn't mean you ever have to use them - but can do so if the need ever arises (which for me is probably about 1% of the time). Where technology really comes into play for me is in processing my raw files - but even that I keep to a minimum (abiding by photojournalism norms). I suppose for many the biggest challenge would be to develop the self-discipline to resist using all the technology made available with today's cameras - as they might say: "Why use it? Because it's there." I suppose for them, something like the M10-D might be necessary. But the M10-D cheats, too, with its available connectivity and ability to access its menus. Perhaps best go with the Leica M-D (type 262), which does not have connectivity or menus - a true film-like digital camera.

Love your work, love your style and really like ur openminded style. Keep up these superb video's. And btw almost all the lice gear keep there value, most other brand drops dramatically,

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you much, I made a note to point out holding their value but I forgot to mention that so I’m glad you said it here.

Thanks Justin for the great video. I came here to be convinced to buy a Leica :) I really like Leica M cameras because of their form factor and simplicity - as you mentioned. They are perfect cameras for my application (street photography) as well, but at the same time, Leica's prices are unjustifiably high for no apparent reasons! The fact that Leica has less features than other cameras is a very important reason that it has to be cheaper because it takes less material, resources, research and technology to manufacture but it is insanely more expensive than others. I am all for simplicity. When I take my camera out, all the bells & whistles are turned off on my camera. I don't use any of those features just to simplify my photography but if I really need any of those features, then I can turn them back on with no charge and my camera is still cheaper than Leica - it was hell a lot cheaper when it was brand new let alone now. I also haven't upgraded my 2 cameras for the last 5 years - I might get a mirrorless at some point and that's only for the quieter shutter sound but otherwise my Nikon D7200 is still rocking with no issues. Plus, because it is not expensive at all, I don't feel like I have to be precious about it and can put it through hell if I need to. If it is pouring down but I see a photo opportunity, then I take my camera out and take the picture without being worried about the camera and cost also it has a great weather sealing which helps but even if it dies, then no big deal. It won't cost me much to replace (mind you my D7200 has been soaked with ocean water 3 times and it's got even salt crystals inside the viewfinder but it is still working with no issues). But that's not the same case with most Leica cameras. They are expensive and most don't even have proper weather sealing which isn't about simplicity or form factor. (I hear M11 has weather sealing but if I'm not mistaken M11 is the only M camera that has weather sealing.) Anyway, I'd love to hear your comments on that :)

Hey, Justin, yes, you are right. The M cameras are simple, rugged, well made and fun. Yes, I do put a lens on it and spend the day with that lens/camera combo. I do not use the Leica lenses as they are just too steep. I like the CV series which are quite good but a little too bright. I have a couple of old KMZ Jupiter 8's ('51 and '57) which have the Sonnar look of a more subdued and solid color and a Cooke Amotal for the "Cooke Look" wide open and good color when not. But back to your premise, yes, simple, grab the camera with a good 50 on it and go out and shoot. Remember the Jesuit motto of learning, "Repititio, repititio, repititio." The Canon LTM 28mm f/2.8 is also sweet. I wish we could BS over some good ca phe nau. Cheers and stay healthy.

@AskMOTT

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for your comments Zoltan, would love to BS some day :).

Super well explained!!!

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks you :)

I shot a wedding with a Leica. it was quite a challenge but thought i was more comfortable with my camera than i would be with a rented sony. Images turned out really good, of course with some margin to improve but my client was really happy with the results.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

You can't ask for much more than that, you're happy and so is the client :). Many people wouldn't even consider a Leica for a wedding shoot, they'd be too scared. I know when I was shooting weddings years ago I wouldn't have been brave enough to attempt that, but now I'd love to.

'Leica' is shorthand for 'Leitz Camera' and was traditionally used for the camera division of Ernst Leitz (Wetzlar). I've not moved to Leica cameras yet but I've owned a couple of top-of-the-range Leitz/Leica binoculars for over 30 years. My first bins are a pair of Leitz Trinovid 10x40 BAN (from 1988) that are still in excellent condition and as sharp as a razor. My second pair are the equally impressive Leica Ultravid 10x42 HD (from 2009). If the camera lens made by this company are as excellent as their binoculars then I can't see how any other make can beat them.

Definitely get it, had a Q2 but sold it and I got a SL2s probably in Leica style is complex, but once fiddled and set up. And with using the manual 35mm 1.4 voigtlander which stays on it, and is well sold the Q2 as like 35mm lens loads more. Its mega, Super solid. Nice one go steady

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Those SL2’s also feel great in the hand Sam. I loaned one from Leica Vietnam for a story and I really enjoyed using but ultimately I went w two M10s to stay fluid.

As for price - I was on a Leica workshop in Manchester UK not long after the bombing at the Aria Grande Concert. We were sent out to shoot and a few shops down from the Leica store was the Bang and Olufsen store. I walked in just to look at their EarPods as I was looking at the display down came an opaque screen. An assistant came towards me asking "can I help you" in a suspicious manner (TBF I had long beard, dressed in jeans and T-Shirt). Obviously they expected me to run off with a load of Bang Olufsen gear. When I turned towards him he saw the camera around my neck and his attitude completely changed - It was my "Pretty Woman"moment

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

Your Pretty Woman moment , ha ha , that’s awesome Paul.

great video! instant subscribed ;-) greets from germany

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching Frank, greetings back from Hanoi :)

Good video. Thanks

@AskMOTT

6 ай бұрын

Thank you Richard, it's an old video so I'd like to think my production quality is better now and my flow is a little better but all the things I said I still feel for sure. Thanks for watching.

Back in the day's of film, my first SLR was the Pentax K-1000.. A nice full frame Camera.. Then I bought an R-3 mot, have the 90mm, 50mm and my favorite 24mm f2.8.. Sold the R3 body and moved up to the R8 body, still pull it out and shoot a roll or two from time to time.. I will never get rid of it..

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Right on, I wish had the patience to develop film.

You did a good job articulating the indescribable 'vapor' that i get when I pick up an 'M' series. I'm by no means a gearhead, never heard of a 10d until just now. I love the idea of a no-screen digital. Yes, for the surprise factor but more importantly: it's one less thing to distract me from flow. Someone told me it's called 'chimping' when you're constantly checking the screen?I think back to my early days in photography where I had exactly one camera (A Contax 137(?) with a 50mm 1.7 T* Zeiss) Very similar control set up as your 'M' series. I distinctly recall shooting some future pro-skateboarders at the old 'Pipeline' in Upland, CA. I would survey the area, set a baseline (f2.8@1000) and as I would shoot I would adjust my exposures on the fly just by the feel of the clicks. 95% of my concentration was composition because I 100% trusted my camera, Leica gives me that same comfortable, trusting feel. $8000 is def not chump change but when you get portfolio quality shots it doesn't take long for that camera to pay for itself and then some! Admittedly my Fujifilm has lots of cool things it can do, but it also took about a year before I felt I had a comprehensive understanding of ALMOST all its features. And as I explained to someone who is still in the learning curve, your camera needs to only do THREE things, set the shutter speed, set the aperture and focus. Get the right combo f-stop and shutter speed and you're good! While I was getting my BFA at ArtCenter we had an old school SOB lab tech, Archie Ferrante, who would be in the lab to remind us that we didn't know squat and that his dog could process film better than we could. Part of the whole ArtCenter credo 'break you down before building you up' boot camp way of teaching. When lecturing about pricing and costs he often told us 'film is cheap, images are not' Mind you this was when digital files were still measured in KB! And when you hit the shutter you tended to put a bit more thought into the image because it literally cost money every time! All this to say, there is something intangible about a Leica that sets it apart, and you can count pixels 'till your eyeballs dry up and fall from the sockets, do hyper-radon spectral gamma inversion scope assessment studies(like that?😜)but after the moment has passed, the once in a lifetime image is gone do you look at your camera and say 'I hope I got that' or do you KNOW you got it. You're a little hipster for my tastes but once I realized you aren't just playing pretend I'm happy I gave you a chance and subscribed.

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you Kevin and while I appreciate you taking a chance on me if our relationship is going to go to evolve you can't define me as a hipster, have no mustache, I don't shoot film and film alone, and while I do carry various satchels guilty as charged I'm way more of a shipster than I am a hipster, completely different species, not even a sub-species :).

I was testing the waters by getting a Q2 liked it and picked up Q2M - Point n shoots really. I love both of them Eventually I'll move up but for right now I'm good with it. Sony? They update their bodies every 20 minutes.. More often than the NYC subway arrives on time. Also in Sony's defense the menu system has been revamped(I'm not a Sony shooter) Congratulate me! I'm a new Sub!

Great video .. Justin I let all my Nikon kit go in 2015 .. now I’m a happy Leica user .. I wear it everyday .. .. one camera one lens … way to go ! … IMHO

Great video, totally agree, indeed less is MORE!

I was surprised you didn’t mention that Leica bodies and lenses retain their value for longer than other brands so whilst they are a large up front cost you can recover more of that if and when the time comes, provided of course you treat it kindly.

Cool. Thanks for sharing.

@AskMOTT

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watch Rupert.

Hi Justin, I agree with you, having shot leicas for many years I miss the simplicity. Its my favourite system by far, now I shoot olympus , enough quality but complicated menus, etc..How do you deal with sensor dust?, My m9 was a pain in the neck with that, dont know if the newest models are better in this aspect. I mainly shot in nature so thats an important point to me..thanks

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Hello Daniel, I haven’t had any issues w dust but I’m also rarely changing lenses as I keep my 35mm on most of the time.

Still shooting a Leica M3 SS, M6TTL and M7. Shooting the poor mans Leica, Fuji Xpro1 and Xpro3. Saving up for a used Leica Monochrome. B&W is my favorite way to shoot.

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

Nice set up, curious to hear how you like the Monochrome when you get one.

@trappedindc8678

2 жыл бұрын

@@AskMOTT once I find on for around $2500 I’ll let you know. They’re getting close.

Thanks for your video. I always like your enthusiasm about Leica and especially about the M10-d. I share the same thought and own the same camera ;) I love it for the exact same reasons you mention. BTW I saw you have an Elmar 135. How does that work out for you? Doable with the rangefinder? Or do you need a a visoflex for proper focussing? Your shots looked great on YT with it :) Keep the videos coming! :)

I totally agree with your assessment of Leica cameras. I have had a Leica M4 system that I used for many years for performance photography, because it was very quiet and of course because it was sharp as a tack. I transitioned to digital format quite some time ago and at the time Leica was not making a digital camera. I did search for an adaptor that would let me use my Leica lenses with my Nikon bodies to no avail. Recently I discovered a new Kickstarter campaign featuring digital backs that can be used on Leicas. I am anxiously awaiting the delivery of this back so I can once again use my beloved Leicas.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching Lee , share that Kickstarter link that is interesting.

@leeeverett6160

3 жыл бұрын

@@AskMOTT You are welcome... The company is called 'I'm Back® 35' They are making digital backs for many different cameras, including Leica.

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

@@leeeverett6160 Thank you Lee, I'll check them out.

Leica cameras are amazing, I had a M6 when still doing film and loved it, but the current Leica digital cameras are priced as luxury items… It just becomes too impractical, especially when looking at mirror less camera offerings from Fuji.

@edwardrook8146

2 жыл бұрын

Fuji color is poor

Leica changed the way that documentary photography was done. I have an old double-wind M3 and a Pentax SV the ergonomics are almost the same. The stripped down nature means I see the world through the viewfinder and capture the moments as they come up with those cameras. There is nothing except my mind’s eye, my eye and the camera. That M10 is wonderfully old school. It leaves the viewing of images as something that happens later and keeps the mind’s eye, my eye and the camera together making images. The modern way has the final image too close to the image capture and muddying the thought processes. I understand the zen quality of simple gear. Most cameras are as good as each other. The images are made in post production. Build quality and longevity in a tool are priceless. Your choices are utterly valid.

Just bought a Lumix / Leica ZS70 .. Very Excited

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

Congrats Stephen.

I did go into a Leica store, I played with the M11. It felt solid and good in hand. I also popped in my own SD card and made a few shots for assessment later at home. I got home and to be brutally honest, the files delivered nothing more that a sony, canon, fuji or nikon could deliver. Yes it was well built, but the files were honestly, nothing special. They were not $13,000 AUD worth of image quality. Can I afford one, hell yeah, I can afford several, but the image quality is what compelled me to say no and leave it. It didnt technically deliver anything special. But.........if i decided to retire and just have one camera for my day to day photography, YES, I would probably purchase the M11 and couple of lenses. It's a camera to be enjoyed in the moment and not as a tool in the toolbox like my work cameras. Its a bit like a women's handbag. Any handbag does the job, but my wife always says she wants. YSL, Gucci bag because they are a status symbol. LOL, I tell her to buy one but she always stops and says that a bag is a bag and a cheaper bag does the same job.

I know what you are saying and now at this stage in my life i can also say i agree with a lot fo what you are saying. but i would not have if i had been in the earlier part of my photographic journey. Back then i just could not afford it and actually never was keen on trying to get one even if i could afford it. I just could not understand why it would be any better for my photography than anything i could afford already. Fast forward many years and i have gone through systems and cameras like most of us have most likely, but i was pretty extreme and lost a lot of money buying and selling and buying back into systems and while it is part of the experience and learning and getting to know what will in the end work best for you, i could have moved a bit more in a straight line towards that goal and i would be a lot less poor ;) I went through Canon, Nikon Fuji and leica along the way, and the only system i have had as my base was Nikon. And on the side i had other mirrorless cameras as my smaller travel or street cameras, mainly from Fuji which i really liked and still like but probably wont get back into after i started shooting with Leica instead. On the Nikon side i came to the same conclusion you did several years ago, meaning i upgraded up until the D810 and then realized i would never need that many pixels, as well as deciding the body and character of the lenses and how much they inspired me in my photography was more important than pixels and other specs. All that image stabilization and stuff they make us believe we MUST have to be able to take great photograph. Its so ridiculous , especially since we all have so much proof of how little that really means when it comes to taking a great picture . Look no further than all the great photogs of our past using such "limited" means and still being able to do that, they just practiced their photography instead of chasing gear and talking about it lol. So i stayed with the Nikon DF and the D4, a sensor i love, and a kit of lenses i really like, both manual and AF newer G ones. Then i also bought a Leica Q at first. Loved it, it was my street and documentary camera and one i thought id keep for a very long while. After that i kind of knew id always have some sort of leica camera, just because of the things you said, and because i love picking it up and shoot with it. And that means so much. A quick setback when i sold it and went into Fuji for the X-T3 and lenses, and then immediately regretted it and bought probably my most loved camera to date, the Leica Q-P. So that would have been it for me, i had the Nikon gear i loved using and felt no need to upgrade, and i had my beloved Leica Q-P. yes, i rediscovered Film photography again , and then i was into the frey again, but this time not upgrading but buying the used camera bodies i wanted to get a kit for that, but that actually played into what i already had. I sold the Leica Q-P and got myself a few lovely Nikon FE2+NikonFM3a bodies, a Leica M4 and a used Leica M240. So now i have the best of both worlds for me, lenses i can switch between my digital and analog bodies both on the Leica side and the Nikon side. And no more upgrading and i hope the gear i have just last for a long while now:D So now i can finally say i agree with you, you don't need those pixels or technically "advanced " bodies, you need gear that inspires you and works for you and your photography. the your are set:) /Martin The swede.

this is crazy crazy crazy damn good video.. I always cunfiuse by anymean how to pick the gear what will good enough for me with all the features, and so much photographer explain about how crazy camera right now and it makes me distracted to just alway seeing the tools. but these video make me see my self.. thank you so much to make the great content like this. *sorry if my english bad lol,

@AskMOTT

3 жыл бұрын

I'm trying to avoid crazy Sadrail, that's why I bought a simple Leica ha ha. thanks for watching and thanks for your kind words.

@sadrailally

3 жыл бұрын

@@AskMOTT I mean I like crazy thoughts that make simple things happen.. and I love this video so much. I'm also planning if I have enough money I will bought a leica, but people around me said "that the bad idea, its not worth it and the features are too few for such an expensive camera" I thought maybe I was crazy to thing how simple the camera and I looked at it like I didn't want to stop shooting. Till I found this video and I realize photography its personal emotion.. my pleasure justin 🙏🏽 and also thanks you so much for reply this comment to make conversation

All good points.....worthwhile commentary

@AskMOTT

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you .

Short answer: No. Long answer: If you enjoy the experience and can justify the price. Yes. But shooting Leica won't make anyone a better photographer, nor necessarily produce better images.

@SourPlanet

4 ай бұрын

I pity anyone who thinks that camera makes the photographer, and I realize that you actually have to point that out as you did because those people do exist.

I use and beat up my Leica Q for everything, portraits, food, cars, architecture, drinks, watches. The leica system is something you appreciate when you own it, I didn't really get it until I got my Q. The lenses have a special character that it's impossible to reproduce.