Kalki movie adaptation of Hinduism ❌ Kalki movie inspired by Hinduism ✅

@kdreamscosmos4279

11 күн бұрын

Final battle inspired by Infinity war

@Partha__Pratim__Dutta

11 күн бұрын

​@@kdreamscosmos4279agar proper knowledge nahi hai to..mat bola karo bhai

@kdreamscosmos4279

11 күн бұрын

@@Partha__Pratim__Dutta Kalki ka final battle infinity war jesa nhi laga?... wo log vision ko dhund rhe the yha sumati ke bacche ko, wakanda invisible wall ke andr hota h ye v invisible wall ke andr hai, waha wakanda forever kar rhe the yaha kal ke liye kar rhe hain.. hand gestures v same the, bht sari chize maching thi bro. Hajun search karna zara Google image me? Pura Yaskin copied h uska. Tumhe knowledge na ho to baat na kia karo.

@ashok_editsyou

10 күн бұрын

​@@kdreamscosmos4279 Bro hmara kalki puraan purana h ya infinity war? Aur sumati ke piche Jo ye log maarne ke liye nikle h.. woh toh puuri sense bnata h.. taaki kalki ko born hone se rok skey.. Brain cells ka istemaal kiye krr oye tu.. Goro ki itni mat chaata krr.. Apne granth padd..

@RiteshGff

10 күн бұрын

Chal na Hollywood ka chatne Wale ​@@kdreamscosmos4279

Other movies 🤡 kalki 2898 movie 🗿

@shubh_chandrakar9334

11 күн бұрын

Showing karn as hero sony putra krna 😂😂😂..

@Nammaprakara-j7l

11 күн бұрын

It's Telugu movie

@gamesnsnacks

11 күн бұрын

Bro that emoji is used to show Dumbness

@gamesnsnacks

11 күн бұрын

​@@Nammaprakara-j7lNah bro, it's an Indian movie directed by Telugu director and Majority Telugu artists ( I don't know) But Big B, Deepika, Kamal Hassan, Dulquer, and many more are from other industries hence it is an Indian Movie

@cringekiller348

11 күн бұрын

@@shubh_chandrakar9334 Why not? It's literally the redemption of anti heroes of Mahabrata. karna was a great hero of Mahabrata, according to vyasa himself

Deepika With Vishu inside her crossing the fire scene ❤❤❤ . I cried😢😢

@SPS.THE.YOUTUBER

10 күн бұрын

Why bro..😂😂❤❤❤ It's just the way Lord Shree MahaVishnu made her mother to walk like that. So that the fire itself went back.

@bhavesh_unstoppable

10 күн бұрын

It was scene inspired by game of thrones

@LordeGaurangan

10 күн бұрын

@@bhavesh_unstoppable it was actually inspired by Vasudeva taking krishna from mathura. Ganga gave way for vasudeva as he was carrying infant krishna on his head.

@amazinggameworld3642

10 күн бұрын

That was Scene was like next level, felt something different the bgm song at that time was like a energy beating .....

@harekrishna2291

9 күн бұрын

Jai jagannath 🙏 🙏 🙏 Read kalki puran and bhavishya malika. A movie or serial me jada tar mangadant bakwas bhara ha. Hare Krishna Hari Bol 👍🙏😀

This Not A Bollywood Movie It's From Tollywood Don't Take Credit For Everything And Just Tell Bollywood

@kids-gamer

11 күн бұрын

Bhai wo( bollywood vs truth) likha hua hai.

@saurabhsinghrawat4292

11 күн бұрын

​@@kids-gamer😂tollywood vs truth likha h dhang se dekh

@csriniku

10 күн бұрын

Tamudu... pan india movie... not tolliwood or Bolliwood ... A movie that is above regions... Proper Indian movie...

@SPS.THE.YOUTUBER

10 күн бұрын

​@@kids-gamer Instead of truth keep Tollywood ❤😂

@SPS.THE.YOUTUBER

10 күн бұрын

​@@csriniku When a movie failed as pan India you get regional differences. But when it succeeded you get loos motions aa. How can you mix our hardship to yours. RIP Bollywood 😂😂❤❤❤

Its not bollywood movie ❌️ its tollywood movie ✅️ ofcourse indian cinema

@shiftenter10

5 күн бұрын

Hollywood copy

@SlkIndia

5 күн бұрын

@@shiftenter10 nope it's distopian era which tells what will happen if future when there will be no fresh water air food so watch the movie instead of calling it copy and its mentioned in kalki purana too

@user-gl8nf4qv5c

4 күн бұрын

​@@shiftenter10your name really tell me about your character😂

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

According to scriptures Kaliyug will be extremely woke. This world will only go woke to woker, it'll never go the other way around. But in Kalki 2898 AD is clearly apitalist and it's a communist agenda. This movie is also misrepresentating mahabaratha, why would the powerful Krishna need a bodyguard like Ashwathama? Also there's no scripture of Krishna hyping Karna or removing Ashwathama's stone like shown in the film. When you have that much budjet, why would anyone spend it for robots and places we've seen in many hollywood movies, why can't use that money to show the beauty of Indian culture and architecture like in Bahubali. This movie did not make me root for any characters, there was no emotion in fight scenes. The movie lagged so much bcuz of Prabhas and even if cameos were removed it wouldn't bring any change to the story. According to Puranas Kalki's father name is Vishnuyashas and in the movie Kali's name is Yaskin, in Kalki 2 if they showed Kalki's father as Yaskin, then it'll he just another hinduphobic movie.

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

According to scriptures Kaliyug will be extremely woke. This world will only go woke to woker, it'll never go the other way around. But in Kalki 2898 AD is clearly capitalist and it's a communist agenda. This movie is also misrepresentating mahabaratha, why would the powerful Krishna need a protector like Ashwathama? Also there's no scripture of Krishna glorifying Karna or removing Ashwathama's stone like shown in the film. When you have that much budjet, why would anyone spend it for robots and places we've seen in many hollywood movies, why can't use opputunity to show the beauty of Indian culture and architecture like in Bahubali. This movie did not make me root for any characters, there was no emotion in fight scenes. The movie lagged so much bcuz of Prabhas and even if cameos were removed it wouldn't bring any change to the story. According to Puranas Kalki's father name is Vishnuyashas and in the movie Kali's name is Yaskin, in Kalki 2 if they showed Kalki's father as Yaskin, then it'll he just another hinduphobic movie.

Kalki is not Bollywood it's Tollywood.

The movie is amazing! So many scenes that will give you goosebumps 🥶👌🏻

@gotyaprasad7856

10 күн бұрын

Especially krishna entry scene

@Dothraki-qe5lk

10 сағат бұрын

Bhai mahbharat dekha he? ..

Kalki is the only Indian movie which done justice to the epic Mahabharat 🔥🔥🔥

@saurabhsingh5349

11 күн бұрын

Bhai sahi se mahabharat dekho Krishna ne Karna ko vardan diya tha ki vo agle avtar me karna Krishna ke sath honge ​@@subrespec6144

@Mobadox0011

11 күн бұрын

@@subrespec6144who says that he is alive ?? Bro reels mese movie dekhke kuch bhi mt likha .. do u even see the movie gareeb😂??

@Mobadox0011

11 күн бұрын

@@subrespec6144karna ka punr janam hua hai na ki alive tha 😂😂 chutiya log

@adityatiwari659

11 күн бұрын

Tu to telegram se dekta hai gareeb 😂​@@Mobadox0011

@medicalkira9350

11 күн бұрын

Kon sa Mahabharata mein mention hai krna arjuna se jyada shaktishali hai 🤔 m to jo Mahabharata padha hu usme krna daanveer ghamandi aur yudh chhor kr bhagne wala aur Arjuna k prati ishrya rakhne wala dikhaya gya hai

Kalki movie Bollywood ❌️ Tollywood✅️

@Karanyadav_in

9 күн бұрын

Indian Movie 💙

@Karanyadav_in

9 күн бұрын

Indian Culture

@satishreddyparpelly

8 күн бұрын

It’s Indian movie

@user-tj9wz1rc8q

8 күн бұрын

@@satishreddyparpelly Nah bro its oficially Tollywood movie aur hame bhi proud se accept karna chaihe its a tollywood movie

@MemozaFusion

7 күн бұрын

​​@@user-tj9wz1rc8q Haa bhai isliye tho bol raha Indian Cinema, tollywood thodi India ke bahar 😂 (pata nhi kahase bewakoof log ajate hai)

why why and why always comparing ourselves with Hollywood and feeling inferior complex ... plz don't compare this movie with Hollywood films they are fiction and comical.

@mujhe_kya_mai_toh_tamatar_hu

11 күн бұрын

Agar compare nhi krenge toh inki videos kaise banegi 🤡

@DhanjitGogoi-ev5ko

11 күн бұрын

Why are you try to get rid of truth?? Accept the truth.

@subrespec6144

11 күн бұрын

damn tthe comment

@SarojSingh-nq5ql

11 күн бұрын

Bhai mere vfx ko compair karenge tabhi sudhrega ye kesi baat hui ki kuch bhi banayenge accept karlo compare mat karo.

@PrayasRahangdale

11 күн бұрын

Karenge compare! Kya kar lega? Agar 2 cheeze exist karti hai toh comparison toh hoga hi na. Achha dekh, ek movie hai uske review me harr aspect pe baat hogi toh vo harr aspect kisi aur film me bhi hoga. Haina? Ya to uske comparison me kam achha ya zyada achha. Hum bhi movies ko rank karte samay ya apni favorite films ko ranking upar neeche dete samay COMPARISON hi karte hai na. Ek cheez dusri se achhi hai ya nahi. Bkl.

Telugu films are highly reliable when it comes to representing and promoting Hindu culture.

@shiftenter10

5 күн бұрын

Stop getting brainwashed by cinema

South Indian movie industry is way way way ahead than bollywood, they are at the level of International Cinema.

@shivamanibalaji7151

5 күн бұрын

Bro if the same movies made in South Indian cinema were made in Bollywood u would be roasting bollywood

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

@@shivamanibalaji7151 If bollywood is making movies like adipurush, omg 2 and brahmastra, how can you expect people not to roast bollywood?

@shivamanibalaji7151

3 күн бұрын

@@The_Cinema_Lover_ bro at least we bollywood fans say it as flop not like u South Indian fans who say shit movies like kgf and rrr as great

@shivamanibalaji7151

3 күн бұрын

@@The_Cinema_Lover_ and second thing omg 2 is not a bad movie it's a far greater movie than your kgf,rrr and kantara

@The_Cinema_Lover_

3 күн бұрын

@@shivamanibalaji7151 Omg 2 is 3rd class hinduphobic movie that used puranas to push their woke agenda. We say films like RRR is not flop bcuz factually they were not flop. It's a fact that these south movies collected way more than any bollywood movie. Wake up to reality. People of India including north Indians have already proven which are better films through box office.Forget about us even common people are not watching bollywood movies, cuz who wanna waste their time watching shit. And you still say bollywood is better 🤡🤡🤡🤡.Nepo kids get flim after film even if they're not talented, no matter how many flops they give, they get film after film in bollywood. RRR won oscar, bollywood hasn't won shit. One Pathaan movie can't save bollywood. Bollywood is doomed. Again saying, wake up to reality.

Adbhut....the mention of Puranic facts is commendable....love your narration....Har har Mahadev 😇😇😇

first off its telugu film industry not bollywood correct your thumbnail.

@SarojSingh-nq5ql

11 күн бұрын

Did u even watched the video?

@SPS.THE.YOUTUBER

10 күн бұрын

​@@dhruvilkotadiya7878 Rey it's Bollywood ra. Not Tollywood. He didn't changed thumbnail

@lyricass7810

10 күн бұрын

This people want to take credit for children that was not born for them 😂. Cheap fellows😂

@EliteXotik

9 күн бұрын

@@dhruvilkotadiya7878 bro you watch the thumbnail

@MrRAY18OG

6 күн бұрын

Ok Liger is bollywood but Kalki is Tollywood What a

Tollywood is the face of Indian movie not bollywood 😤

Please please dont misguide audience kalki is not a Bollywood movie adipurush is a Bollywood movie Bollywood can't make this type of good movie

@mownishchowdary799

11 күн бұрын

Need not try to question Bollywood Dimags..

@PraBOSSfanforever

11 күн бұрын

This is a Pan Indian movie! Bcoz the crew is from almost all parts of thr Country

@Myhandle04

11 күн бұрын

​@@PraBOSSfanforeveronly few actors from different industries but lead role, director and production house is from Tollywood. It is Telugu made Indian Cinema. Stop exploiting credit shamelessly. PERIOD.

@PraBOSSfanforever

11 күн бұрын

@@Myhandle04 when did I deny delulu

@EliteXotik

9 күн бұрын

@@Myhandle04😂 nice

The script you mentioned as ancient is called Ranjana lipi. It is a script used by the Newar community in Nepal since ancient time till now, and is the national script of Nepal.

I hv stopped wasting time and money in bollywood 😂😂 i use that to plant trees 😊🙏🏻

@thebohosapiens

11 күн бұрын

Amazing

@moviezworld564

11 күн бұрын

First of all it's not a Bollywood movie. It's a Telugu movie!! The way nag aswin used his vision, it's first time in Indian cinema with such a great visuals which was never experienced before. So everyone should respect this movie.

@user-rr7ox9le5h

11 күн бұрын

It's not bollywood movie, they don't have bad intentions

@user-pg2mr1zm3s

11 күн бұрын

It's telugu movie not bollywood

@roast3511

7 күн бұрын

​​@@thebohosapiens well at start you say I disagree because hollywood do this so many times showing wrong different cultures

I can't remember when was the last time I went to see a movie in cinema hall. But I watched Kalki on 30th June. Its a movie worth watching in cinemas. A true masterpiece by Nag Ashwin. Kudos to Him for bringing a revolution in Indian film industry

Sir you should make a video on how the British implanted Cast system in Hinduism and in Hindu scriptures there isn't mentioning of the word Cast at the first place only!,I would highly recommend that you must make a discussion video with Neeraj Atri sir on this topic for more informations,that video is needed!🚩🕉️

@adish7839

12 күн бұрын

correct

@Abhay81Shetty

11 күн бұрын

॥ जय श्री राम॥

@user-ft5kp2yv5f

11 күн бұрын

Kabhi history padha hota to ye bakchodi nhi karta vishwash na ho to apni priya😂book manusmriti hi padh lo jisme shudro ke baare me kya kya❤likha gaya hai

@adish7839

11 күн бұрын

@@user-ft5kp2yv5f tune konsi history padhi hai ? manusmriti kya pure hindu grantho ko Angrezo ne toda maroda tha. Manusmriti mai to saaf likha hai janm se koi shudra aur Brahman nhi hota. Brahman ko bhi bohot sari saza likhi hai

@SahilKumar-wm3zo

11 күн бұрын

​@@user-ft5kp2yv5f😂😂

One thing is inaccurate in this movie, that is when supreme god takes an avatar, he is never born by a womb like us humans he appears and descends to earth. Like, when lord krishna was born ,he was never in her mother womb ,instead lord vishnu appeared in his 4 armed form in front of his parents and toom the form of a child. When narsimha avatar, was there he appeared out of a pillar or stambh. When matsya avatar was there the lord in form of fish appeared in front of manuh the first human. This is true for all other avatars of shri vishnu as well.

@agniswar3

10 күн бұрын

And what about Lord Ram? In the Ramayana it is clearly mentioned that Mother Kaushalya got pregnant after the putresthi yagna and have birth to Lord Ram.

@agniswar3

10 күн бұрын

The descent of each avatar is unique.

Why every youtubers say that Kalki avatar will be last avatar, bhagwan Vishnu is always there so his avatars neither have beginning not ending.

@agniswar3

10 күн бұрын

Kalki is the last avatar of this manvantar

@sumanbarua2000

10 күн бұрын

@@agniswar3 exactly and that is what youtubers should say

@mayankindian3750

10 күн бұрын

True brother 😅​@@agniswar3

Change your thumbnail...first go and search which industry from kalki 2898 AD is ?..🙄

@abhay86647

11 күн бұрын

It's just an attractive technique, chill bro

@souviksikdar1864

11 күн бұрын

Clickbait dude😅😅

I seriously doubt the intent of the makers of this movie Towards the end they have portrayed the main villain as a reincarnation of Arjuna, and saviour of the day being Karna! This is some serious twisting of scriptures to suit the agenda!

@sujanpoojary5284

7 күн бұрын

😂who said he was incarnation of Arjun ….gandiv can used by anyone who is capable and villan got a drop of essence from Kalki so was able to lift

@nerisalobo

5 күн бұрын

You doubt their intentions because your braincells are dead and didn't bother to pay attention to what actually happened

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

According to scriptures Kaliyug will be extremely woke. This world will only go woke to woker, it'll never go the other way around. But in the movie it is capitalists vs oppressed people, Kalki 2898 AD is clearly anti capitalist and it's a communist agenda. This movie is also misrepresentating mahabaratha, why would a powerful God like Krishna need a bodyguard like Ashwathama? Also there's no scripture of Krishna glorifying Karna or removing Ashwathama's stone like shown in the film. When you have that much money, why would anyone spend it for robots and places we've seen in many hollywood movies, why can't use that money to show the beauty of Indian culture and architecture like Bahubali. It didn't make me root for any characters, there was no emotion in fight scenes. The movie lagged so much of cringiness of Prabhas.

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

Jknvh

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

According to scriptures Kaliyug will be extremely woke. This world will only go woke to woker, it'll never go the other way around. But in the movie it is capitalists vs oppressed people, Kalki 2898 AD is clearly anti capitalist and it's a communist agenda. This movie is also misrepresentating mahabaratha, why would a powerful God like Krishna need a bodyguard like Ashwathama? Also there's no scripture of Krishna hyping Karna or removing Ashwathama's stone like shown in the film. When you have that much money, why would anyone spend it for robots and places we've seen in many hollywood movies, why can't use that money to show the beauty of Indian culture and architecture like Bahubali. It didn't make me root for any characters, there was no emotion in fight scenes. The movie lagged so much of cringiness of Prabhas. According to Puranas Kalki's father name is Vishnuyashas and in the movie Kali's name is Yaskin, in Kalki 2 if they showed Kalki's father as Yaskin, then it'll he just another hinduphobic movie.

Great review bhai The reference to Srimad Bhagavatham was indeed commendable. Wish to see more content from your end😇 Jai Shri Ram 🙏🙏🙏

*Boycott of Peacefuls should be permanent. Only temporary as a reaction will achieve nothing. We should calculate 1 years impact of economic boycott and from this consider the effect of it in next 10-20-50-100 years which will be tremendous.* *Just like any other habit it will require deliberate conscious efforts for first few months/years until you get used to it. Your few months/years efforts to make this habit part of your life will have enormous contribution to ensure their complete economic destruction and unsustainability. This habit should be made as a part of our culture and maintained generation after generation.* *Every aware hindu in their life needs to convince atleast 10 hindu houses to boycott them permanently.* **C0py And Share This Message To Atleast 100 Hindus*

@786JavedPervez

10 күн бұрын

Absolutely right...

@dr.dibyasankhabanerjee2480

10 күн бұрын

Don't consume excess weeds... And try to promote humanity and try to find lord Krishna in humans of every religions as told by our beloved friend Lord Krishna in Gita 😊

@shubham-oh4ki

10 күн бұрын

@@dr.dibyasankhabanerjee2480 Sarch "26 ayats of wasim rizvi" and read those ayat and then tell your opinion. There are more than 70+ such ayats.

@dr.dibyasankhabanerjee2480

10 күн бұрын

@@shubham-oh4ki Don't have time to read those... I'm happy with OUR GITA and Vedas 😊

@shubham-oh4ki

10 күн бұрын

@@dr.dibyasankhabanerjee2480 without knowing what's written in their book how can anyone be safe from their danger. Our kings didn't knew their ideology and this is the single reason for 600 years of their rule.

I think this is the start to a vision of a complete Mahabharat on the big screens by Tollywood. Only it can make something such grandeur, epic and visuals very close to our ancient Bharat by doing justification of charaters.

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

Completely different mahabarath and I slept in the first half.

next level review bhai, i never seen something like this.

Kalki Mahabharat scene = whole adhipurush movie

I don't know why people are thinking the Movie is Very cool but without 3-4 other scenes it doesn't match either with Kalki Puran Bhagavad Mahapuranam Or Bhavishya Puran

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

This movie is also misrepresentating mahabaratha, the beginning and climax kurushetra scene is not mentioned in any scriptures. According to puranas kaliyug is a very woke world, but in Kalki they potrayed kaliyug as capitalistic world to push communist agenda. Just think why would a powerful God like Krishna need a bodyguard like Ashwathama? Also there's no scripture of Krishna glorifying Karna or removing Ashwathama's stone. According to Puranas Kalki's father name is Vishnuyashas and in the movie Kali's name is Yaskin, in Kalki 2 if they showed Kalki's father as Yaskin, then it'll he just another hinduphobic movie.

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

When you have that much money, why would anyone spend it for robots and places we've seen in many hollywood movies, why can't use that money to show the beauty of Indian culture and architecture like Bahubali. It didn't make me root for any characters, there was no emotion in fight scenes. The movie lagged so much of cringiness of Prabhas.

Kalki father is not mentioned cause that was artificially made on deepika. Womb. In puran as this bro said,kalki father is VishnuYash😮 and everyone who watched movie realized that the kamal hasan character name is also Yashkin have yash name attached.🤔 And yashkin was the guy that do pregnant in their lab for power. So,in future kalki cinematic universe Yashkin will be kalki father.👀 Reply anyone

@kkr434

10 күн бұрын

VISHNUYASH AND YASHKIN DOESN'T IT SOUND FAMILIAR.YASHKIN IN OTHER RELIGION MEANS GOD.SIMPLE THEORY VISHNU YASH WA SA GUY WHO EXSISTED 200 YEARS AGO HIS BODY HE WAS AN ASTRONAUT WHO INCIDENTALLY CROSSED DIMENSION WHERE RAKSHAS/AURA/KALI TOOK OVER HIS BODY WAS AND IS SEARCHING FOR BEST VESSEL.KALI KNOWING THAT LORD KALKI WILL BE BORN WANT TO INJECT HIS BODY WITH LORD KALKI POWER FINALLY SERUM MIGHT EXTRACTED FROM LORD VISHNU DIVYA ASTRA OR ANY DIVYA ASTRA .SO THEN WHY DIDN'T ANY WOMEN SURVIVE AFTER 10 DYS OF INJECTION.

@agniswar3

10 күн бұрын

I was thinking the same. But Vishnuyash is supposed to be a righteous monarch while the Yashkin in the movie is pure evil

@kkr434

10 күн бұрын

@@agniswar3 Well concept is much like ANIME where a foreign BEIGN(ASURA/ALIEN/DEVIL)takes over the good person body and starts commiting horrific at. Same cliche of searching for new body.New body is immortal body of HERO OR PROTAGNIST.

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

This movie is also misrepresentating mahabaratha, the beginning and climax kurushetra scene is not mentioned in any scriptures. According to puranas kaliyug is a very woke world, but in Kalki they potrayed kaliyug as capitalistic world to push communist agenda. Just think why would a powerful God like Krishna need a bodyguard like Ashwathama? Also there's no scripture of Krishna glorifying Karna or removing Ashwathama's stone. According to Puranas Kalki's father name is Vishnuyashas and in the movie Kali's name is Yaskin, in Kalki 2 if they showed Kalki's father as Yaskin, then it'll he just another hinduphobic movie.

Still I can't believe that KALKI is an Indian film🔥🔥.. Hollywood range vfx movie that too director (Nag Ashwin ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥) with 2 movie experience in past ✌️

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

Malayali aanalle aa mughavum chiriyum kandappo thanne manasilaayi 😂

Sir you must make a video on how contrary to mainstream narrative(Specially by Leftists and Neo Buddheists)Sati pratha never existed in Bharat at the first place only,it's a huge lie told in our school history books that sadly 99%of Hindus still belive and feel guilty about that!,even Jaipur dialogues Sanjay Dixit and Abhijit Chavda made a discussion video debunking that,that video is needed!🙏🕉️

@S-tx2lk

12 күн бұрын

What is neo Buddheists?

@Anubhavsengupta1902

12 күн бұрын

​@@S-tx2lk Ara tuh kya asman sa tapka hai kya?!,Kyu tuh Neo Budhist tani Navbodho ka bara Mai nahi janta?!😂😂😂😂

@adish7839

12 күн бұрын

Sati was only practised during colonial times, because widows used to be taken as sex slaves by the invaders

@adish7839

12 күн бұрын

@@S-tx2lk Modern buddhist who doesn't follow traditional buddhism

@Anubhavsengupta1902

12 күн бұрын

@@adish7839 And that's exactly what I always say that we Hindus should definitely not feel any kind of guilt or regret about our own culture and heritage instead we should feel proud about that!,but that's exactly what people like Leftists and Neo Buddheists wants they want that we should feel ashamed of being Hindus!

According to puran vishnuyash would be the father of kalki. But here it was shown as a test object of kali.

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

According to Puranas Kalki's father name is Vishnuyashas and in the movie Kali's name is Yaskin, in Kalki 2 if they showed Kalki's father as Yaskin, then it'll be just another hinduphobic movie.

@historiadegauda3740

4 күн бұрын

@@The_Cinema_Lover_ Yes you got my point

I watched the movie today. Nag Ashwin has used creative liberty and made a few changes in his version of Mahabharata .

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

He've also made changes in the old mahabaratha through his kurushetra scenes

Today watched the movie...wow indian cinema is developing rapidly ❤ specially vfx was amazing ...mahabarat scenes were epic ⚡️🔥

Now, a days, even hollywood movies are not up to the mark.

@rakeshpriyanka154

7 сағат бұрын

But gori chamdi dekh ke fisalne ki aadat india me bohot pehle se hai rather than actually seeing the content

Brilliant description and analysis my dear the present scenario of universe which is sure to happen in the days to come due to severe callousness of human being for rapid industrialisation.

You are doing a great job with such videos. Keep up the good work.

Almost every movie which was made previously inspired by Mahabharata had made joke but this is true ; it is showing that every warrior who fought Mahabharata war was great equally.

Movie dekh liya meine .wah kya movie hai yar🔥⚡️ specially war scenes mahabarat aur poora vfx aur characters etc wow bht amazing .kadak🔥⚡️🇮🇳🤯

We south indians represent our culture in a different level take adipurush who is directed by om raut a north indian

@NativeBharatiye

2 күн бұрын

North vs south South bada culture wala h tabhi both Tamil & malyalam movies openly abuse krishna, ram & do missionary activities

What an amazing presentation anant great going loved your work 🎉🎉🎉

Who said it's a bollywood film??

It is not bollywood, it is TFI : Telugu film industry. And directors have the right to change historical facts regarding anything, its called artistic freedom. Try to respect that.

@unblade

11 күн бұрын

Lol Ricebag

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

Oh you mean the film industry that made millions of movies where men are obsessed with women's naval? There'll be a naval/hip scene in every telugu movie.

@rakeshpriyanka154

7 сағат бұрын

​@@The_Cinema_Lover_can't disagree that but they don't make a fun of any culture like bollywood, or else kollywood and mollywood are much more hinduphobic than bollywood

par mahabharat ki strory distorted hain kyunki isme dikhaya gaha hain ki karn arjun se jyada strong hain par asal me Arjun >>>>>>>>. karn Arjun vs Karna all encounters: 1. Virat war: Arjuna singlehandedly defeated all kaurava warriors including Karna (thrice), Bhishma and Drona and destroyed the entire kuru army alone to save the Matsya kingdom (refer Virata Parvam in Authentic Mahabharat eg: BORI CE) 2. Fight with Gandharvas: Karna was defeated by Gandharva king Chithrasena, captured Duryodhana and Karna fled away. But Arjuna alone defeated Chithrasena and released Duryodhana 3. Panchal war: Karna was defeated along with other Kauravas by Drupada; Arjun defeated and captured Drupada 4. At Draupadi Swayamvar: Karna fought with Arjun but was defeated by Arjun and Karna retreated. 5. Mahabharat war day 14: Arjuna slaughtered the Kaurava army and defeated Karna and Drona while hunting for Jayadratha. Nobody could stand against him on that day. He destroyed 7 akshauhinis that day (refer wikipedia Drona parva) Who is better: 1. Abhimanyu's death: Abhimanyu defeated Karna many times during the war and he was invincible for anyone so he along with 7 other warriors through betrayal jointly attacked him like a coward. But on 17th day Arjun challenged the entire army to protect Karna's son Vrishsena and killed him in front of Karna in one-to-one battle. 2. Arjuna was ambidextrous: He was the only warrior who could use both right and left hand for using weapon 3. Arjuna could aim and shoot upto many kilometers even during night 4. Arjuna was the only warrior to wield the mighty Pashupatastra in dwapara yuga, which could destroy the entire cosmos; the only warrior to fight Lord Shiva and impress him. If you read Kirata parva, Lord Shiva said, that no one except him and lord Vishnu from all the three worlds could defeat Arjuna 5. Arjuna was the only warrior who knew all the five tatvas of Archery( fifth one is the ability to give back life) 6. Dhanur Veda, the holy scripture of archery starts by praising lord Shiva, lord Rama and Arjuna 7. Arjuna singlehandedly killed 30 million Nivatakavachas and Kalakeyas whom even Ravan couldn't defeat 8. Arjuna was Nara, the partial incarnation of lord Vishnu himself. Now coming to the last mentioned arguments: 1. Indra could have given and equally powerful armor(kavach) to Arjuna as he is also a demigod like Surya. He knew the power of his son but wanted to ensure a fair battle as Karna has a divine protection(which ofcourse, is obtained not because of his skill but as a boon). This would make the battle completely based on skills and weapons and not on boons. Just think, many demons got boons by which they could not be killed easily, eg: Hiranyakashipu, Madhu and Kaitab etc. But does that make them more powerful than lord Vishnu, never... just loopholes to escape death. Also he exchanged it for an even more powerful weapon that puts Arjun in more danger. Exchanging one for another is not dana, it is a trade 2. Nagastra has many counter weapons like Garudastra and Arjun had around 130 celestial weapons in his arsenal. According to BORI CE Mahabharat, KMG and Mridananda interpretation of Mahabharat, it was Ashwasena, a snake who lived in Khandava forest in order to take revenge on Arjuna got into Karna's arrow without Karna's knowledge. It was in this situation Krishna saved Arjuna. But when Ashwasena came face to face with Arjuna on the same day, Arjun killed him. 3. Krishna told Arjuna to fire at the time Karna's chariot sunk in soil in order to give respect to curses and make Karna realize his mistake and to remind him of the situation Abhimanyu was in. Krishna used to praise Karna in front of Arjun to make Arjun more aggressive and vengeful and also for not having any head weight so that he can continue sharping his skills even more. Also, it is clearly mentioned in Mahabharat that Drona taught Karna along with Kauravas and Pandavas. Yes, Karna was a student of Drona(just google for yourself). But he was always jealous of Arjuna's skills so he decided to study alone under Parashurama. Also Arjun never got anything with ease, he struggled a lot, he never wanted to be better than Karna, but better than himself. Also Arjun was an epitome of humbleness, kindness and wisdom. He was morally far far greater than anyone else. Remember, it was Karna who ordered the disrobing of Draupadi. For saving the cattle of Brahmins from Thakshak, he entered Draupadi's room to take his bow eventhough he knew that he would have to go for exile, this shows that he was a selfless hero. Also, Karna surrendered himself to Duryodhana the personification of adharma and took part in various evil activities but Arjun surrendered himseelf to Krishna, the supreme lord who gave him the purest of purest the highest knowledge- Bhadavad Gita. Please don't misunderstand me. I am not being biased. I was also a Karna fan, but after studying authentic Mahabharat like BORI CE(most accurate one till known), KMG and Swami Mrudananda interpretation and Srimad Bhagavatham, I got to know the real essence of Mahabharat. Please don't believe in TV serials, they create fake stories to increase their rating. Karna was a good warrior no doubt, but he ended up being a good mango gone bad. Pandavas suffered worst but the had complete faith in dharma and Krishna and followed the right path. But, when society started teasing Karna, he had two ways but he chose the wrong path and got a tragic ending all his skills and valor gone without any use to the society or nation, just he surrendered everything to Duryodhana...and that is the difference. And finally, for those who says Arjuna is nothing without Krishna, we all are nothing without Krishna. He is giving us the power to speak, walk, work and live and without him we are nothing. Krishna was there for everyone including Karna but only Arjun saw the true light of wisdom of Krishna. It is so sad that we live in a society which considers the presence of the supreme lord as a demerit. If we understand Krishna we understand everything including Arjuna...

@himanshusaklani-zx2hg

11 күн бұрын

Abe ye kisi or ko dikha chl

@NightKreators

11 күн бұрын

Karna fought so well at that point, and only that incident is elevated. You have to keep in mind that Ashwatthama felt Karna is powerful than Arjun. At the final war, without Krishna's help it would have been a tough war to decide. Arjun is obviously powerful as mentioned in Mahabharata but Krishna asked Karna to come on the side of Dharma that alone gives Karna some credit to show how much powerful he can be- How much he can do by taking Dharma side. But, he didn't choose the side of dharma and blindly followed for the friendship- Karna is a bad guy but nevertheless he was a great warrior. There is nothing wrong if people like Karna, but its wrong if they comparitively say Arjuna is lower than Karna. Arjuna is nowhere near this, no dark shade character - he was wise, strong and everything a perfect protagonist can be.

@kryptoxt2160

11 күн бұрын

Arjun fans dont like the movie😂😂😂 there is one quote in mahabarata the world will know who karna was thats happening now so you guys cry more😂😂

@varanasidurga5551

11 күн бұрын

Bro. As a person from Telugu industry, we have same thought process.

@saswatpritambaruah6981

11 күн бұрын

Arjun was a great warrior but Karna was great too. Without the help of Lord Krishna Panadavas were nothing compared to Kauravas.

It's not a bollywood movie It's tollywood movie

Bhai kalki wale us mahabharat sceen ko dekh ke lagta hai ki pura mahabharat banna chahiye yar 😊

Jo real Shambhala hai woh toh ek kingdom hai jiske ek village me Kalki ji paida honge air Shambhala aaj ke world se kati hui hai I mean yaha sikh jain buddhist culture nahi balki og Sanatan culture hai I mean aaj bhi yaha je log pehle ke yugo ke logo ki lifestyle ko follow karte hai unki tarah jeete hai and they have superpowers

Jai shree krishna Jai shree ram ❤❤❤

Kalki is not a Bollywood movie, it's Tollywood and Indian cinema, The movie made well and respected our gods and culture very well 😊

Bro, Kalki is Tollywood movie and Adipurush was Bollywood movie.

na bro hollywood also distorts their mythology. It's just that their audiences take it as an entertainment purpose

@mayankindian3750

10 күн бұрын

Hm 😊

@rakeshpriyanka154

7 сағат бұрын

Kyunki waha pe unke culture pe bhaunkne waala koi nahi, idhar to nayi generation khud hi apna culture reject kar rahi hai. So whatever they see in movie sach maanke baith jaayenge

@mayankindian3750

7 сағат бұрын

@@rakeshpriyanka154 yep true unke yha bhai unka culture dikhate hai marvel movies to Saara unke culture se inspire hai or dusre culture se bhi jese jese doctor strange Nepal Jaata Hai bhai

Kalki is distorting Hinduism. "AD" in title alone is the proof

Brother , You are the second person who gave very pleasant review ...God bless you 🙏

8 feet nahi 12 feet aur agar woh kaliyug me janme hote toh 6 feet ke hote

The lipi is from Nepal. You can find that on any stupas wall.

@GauravKhedekar009

4 күн бұрын

Ranjana lipi right?

Honestly, Mahabharata scene gave me goosebumps.

Bohat hi badhiya video dali aapne. Mere khayal se hum jitne v advance level pe jaye phir jo purano mai kaha gaya tha woh sach shabit ho raha hai. Sab kuch unhone likhke rakha hai. Bas unki avatar se paawan hona baki hai Dharti.

Waching kalki movie for fun ✅ Waching kalki movie for concept ✅✅🗿

Main pahle yah clear karna chahta hun. A movie Tollywood ka hai Bollywood ka Nahin Hai. Tollywood : Telugu film industry not a Bollywood

Wow! Awesome review 👌

People are ao much unaware of their own scriptures that they accept any story or scene which is made in the name of god and historical characters but which are not mentioned in any scripture.

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

Yes Kalki is problematic than Adipurush

@rakeshpriyanka154

7 сағат бұрын

​@@The_Cinema_Lover_oh please , bakwas band karke us bawasir ko kalki se to better mat bol, kalki perfect movie nahi hai, problems hai, par adipurush bawasir se bohot better hai

Bhai karna ko hero dikhaye gaya hai movie mei aur arjun ko ghamandi banadiya Jabki arjun karn se jada strong hai

karna ko acha dikhaya or arjun ko bura q dikhaya isme

one question if God saved deepika from fire then why not later why ashwathama comes to rescue?

@kkr434

10 күн бұрын

WHY DIDN'T KRISHNA SAVE ABHIMANYU NEVER LET DRAUPADI CHEER HARAN IN FIRST PLACE . DON'T YOU THINK ABOUT THAT TOO. ASHATHAMMA MUKTI MARG

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

This movie is also misrepresentating mahabaratha, the beginning and climax kurushetra scene is not mentioned in any scriptures. According to puranas kaliyug is a very woke world, but in Kalki they potrayed kaliyug as capitalistic world to push communist agenda. Just think why would a powerful God like Krishna need a bodyguard like Ashwathama? Also there's no scripture of Krishna glorifying Karna or removing Ashwathama's stone. According to Puranas Kalki's father name is Vishnuyashas and in the movie Kali's name is Yaskin, in Kalki 2 if they showed Kalki's father as Yaskin, then it'll he just another hinduphobic movie.

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

@@kkr434 Arjuna asks these same questions to Krishna in Bagavathgeetha, I don't remember what was Krishna's reply.

Waiting for the 2nd part ❤

Kalki movie mahabharat scenes ko pura justify diya hats off, love from assam ❤

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

This movie is misrepresentating mahabaratha, the beginning and climax kurushetra scene is not mentioned in any scriptures. According to puranas kaliyug is a very woke world, but in Kalki they potrayed kaliyug as capitalistic world to push communist agenda. Just think why would a powerful God like Krishna need a bodyguard like Ashwathama? Also there's no scripture of Krishna glorifying Karna or removing Ashwathama's stone. According to Puranas Kalki's father name is Vishnuyashas and in the movie Kali's name is Yaskin, in Kalki 2 if they showed Kalki's father as Yaskin, then it'll he just another hinduphobic movie.

@sanjaysaikia1714

4 күн бұрын

@@The_Cinema_Lover_ ,,, Don't watch dhruvee rathe too much video ,,🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@The_Cinema_Lover_

3 күн бұрын

@@sanjaysaikia1714 I'm saying Kalki movie is hinduphobic and you're saying I'm fan of Dhruv? No logic.

Come on don't call Kalki bollywood, Indian Cinema rather or better Tollywood

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

Its for Clickbate

@jwhypangel

3 күн бұрын

@@The_Cinema_Lover_ you would be wrong for a click bate huh yeah fine

I have read the Mrityunjaya, the death conqueror Book by Shivaji Sawant in collage time. And its almost Mahabharat from eyes of Maharathi Karna. The way Ashwadhama show was perfect as in book. And it was really an emotional scene for me when in movie when we got to know real identity of Bhairava. Thats why i really impress by the movie, like maker of this movie really know what they are doing. Hope next movie will more of treat

Bollywood ❌ Tollywood ✔️

@animeforyou770

10 күн бұрын

This is all Indian movie but Bollywood in thumbnail ❌

In this movie they're glorifying Karan but in actual reality ARJUN is far beyond powerful than Karna , not even once KARAN defeated ARJUN in his life, and ARJUN single handed destroyed all kuru sena in VIRAT YUDH

@sandeep61976

9 күн бұрын

Karna was the strongest or may have equal prowess as Arjun. But the logic here is Arjun stood for Dharma but Karna didn’t stop his friend from doing “A-dharma”. Thats why his went down and he fell in war. Please excuse me if I am wrong. I have started reading very recently and every time I understand something new.

@Arithmetal_info

8 күн бұрын

No read vyasa Mahabharat Arjuna was always above karm in all ways

@Rajkumarirani007

3 күн бұрын

You are right. Karan was not a hero but a villain. Read the Vedvyas Mahabharat.He has been glorified by the leftist historians and movie makers

Well explained ❤❤❤

Kalki has done a fabulous job in integrating the ithisa with the futuristic sci fi dystopia world. This gives me hope that we can have multiple cinematic universes based on our Puranas. At least this makes it mainstream and will motivate the younger generation to know our cool myths and legends. Super Job.

bollywood could never make such movie like kalki even in dreams

Bhai kya baat kar rhe Karn ko hero bataya hai Karn kbse arjun se bada ho gya ?? 🙏🏻Jai shree Ram bhai Yahi to.kaliyug hai Log ravan aur karn ko.mahan kahenge.

@kkr434

10 күн бұрын

NOPE HE WAS ANTI-HERO .DIFFERENCE IND MEIH POLL KIJIYE GUARANTE HAI KARN VS ARJUN MEIH 50-50 HOGA PEOPLE LOVE UNDERDOG .KARN WAS BIGGEST ONE.

@sandrasanthosh1715

6 күн бұрын

Exactly matlab sachme mujhe bhi samajh me nahi ata ki log literally Karn aur ravan ko manthey Arjun ( Maharishi NAR)aur Shri Ram ko nahi

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

It's always the leftists who do this. It's their agenda.

Those who read Mahabharata knows, (karn) was a very bad person, and he instigated (duryodhan) to insult droupadi.😑

@sumitrana6784

2 күн бұрын

If that's what being bad is , then Droupadi was no less than Karn For Calling Duryodhan " Andha ka putra andha " .Every Pandavas had used Casteist Slur to underplay Karn's Existence Tons of times ... And Who instigated Yudhisthira to use His Wife like she is some kind of object to be used as the bet ?..I bet you are morally corrupt enough to not call Yudhisthira Bad for treating his wife like an Object ...And Why did Draupadi have to marry all the Pandavas ? ..What kind of Ratshit Arjuna and Yudhisthira was smoking before Agreeing to treat Droupadi like an object and share among brothers just bc kunti said it without looking at it ? ... There are Tons of times where kunti was against the Kurukshetra War but Pandavas were cherry picking Kurtis words, which one to be followed blindly and which one to be ignored...

@rakeshpriyanka154

7 сағат бұрын

​@@sumitrana6784no one was better bro except shree krishna himself , arjun was better, but overall only god and most pious was shree krishna himself

@sumitrana6784

7 сағат бұрын

@@rakeshpriyanka154 Exactly but Karna's Hater only cherry picking stuffs that's suits their inner headcanon and ignore evrything else .. Krishna never said Karna Bad , even before he regretted what he said to draupadi ... Krishna always compared Karma to All Pandavas combined...

Kalki distorted the history as well. Arjuna was put under the bus while karna and ashwathama were held high. Ashwathama had to repent the most for his sins. Karna was a benevolent. In terms of valor none can come close to Aruna and his devotion to Krishna was second to none. I guess it is still better than bollywood movies. AB - was wonderful, Prabhas was awesome, kamal was ok. Direction was good. I could not stomach the distortion and reversal of roles of Mahabharata heroes…

@nerisalobo

5 күн бұрын

​@avikhatiwada1732powerful warriors don't need God's to side with them to win a war.

Yes. It sets very High Benchmark(At par or better than Some Hollywood Suoerhero Movies) and at the same time remain truly tied to Hindu Epic without doing very significant Intervention so as to lose its essence.

Sir see pratik borade review of this movie

@thebohosapiens

12 күн бұрын

Pratik bhai ne abhi sirf trailer pe review banai hai.

@rutwikjadhav4700

12 күн бұрын

​@@thebohosapiensno he made a review also

@aryanmistry11

11 күн бұрын

he gave positive review with some minor criticisms

@asheeshvlogs5314

11 күн бұрын

Bahut pehle se unka review dekhna chor diya, her cheezh mein criticism khojna hota he unko... Jai Hanuman ke power 🔋 gaining process mein bhi unko abhramic religion reference dikh rha tha

❤❤❤❤

Dear TheBohoSapines, Your mention acient lipi shown in Kalli 2898 AD movie is Nepal's traditional Language Ranjana Lipi. It belongs to Newars communities.

Well explained brother. Movie is top notch. Perfect representation of our culture relating it to the Mahabharath and future. As you said this movie going to set high standards of Indian Cinema to global level. ❤

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

This movie is also misrepresentating mahabaratha, the beginning and climax kurushetra scene is not mentioned in any scriptures. According to puranas kaliyug is a very woke world, but in Kalki they potrayed kaliyug as capitalistic world to push communist agenda. Just think why would a powerful God like Krishna need a bodyguard like Ashwathama? Also there's no scripture of Krishna glorifying Karna or removing Ashwathama's stone. According to Puranas Kalki's father name is Vishnuyashas and in the movie Kali's name is Yaskin, in Kalki 2 if they showed Kalki's father as Yaskin, then it'll he just another hinduphobic movie.

It's not bollywood first. Change it immediately it's tollywood film.

I understood your stupidity Kalki is fictional film Suppose in hollywood films protagonist kills antagonist then in Indian films do the same is that a copy? And kalki is Tollywood , actually adipurush did it not kalki

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

So the kurushetra scenes were all fictional? If bollywood did this you'll say they are distorting our epics. The set, costumes, gadjets, vehicles were all copied from hollywood.

@Charanram-uh6ne

4 күн бұрын

@@The_Cinema_Lover_ not kurukshetra scenes ,the story in future is fictional In future the hologram technology will get extreme and there is a strong chance that the market of hologram technology will be available. The theory of hologram is volumetric manipulation of light intensity And vehicle of Kalki film was designed by Mahendra company to make it futuristic Coming to costumes due to western influence in india the citizens in future people do wear that type of clothes I'm not saying the bollywood is crap ,for example pk is best film I loved but in adipurush om raut ruined it .

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

@@Charanram-uh6ne Kurushetra scenes were fictional bcuz in actual mahabaratham there's nothing like that

@Charanram-uh6ne

4 күн бұрын

@@The_Cinema_Lover_ yes no one can show actual dialogues and location of kurukshetra in films because no one have seen actual kurukshetra war but nag Ashwin give accurate info but not perfect info

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

@@Charanram-uh6ne Not just dialogues but also showing hanuman on flag and Krishna removing gem from Ashwathama was not in actual scriptures. Why the powerful Krishna needs someone like Ashwathama as a bodyguard? I don't understand. And also the leftist have been trying to glorify anti heroes of our epics like Karna and Ravana for a long time, I think Nag also have that agenda.

ये तो साउथ इण्डियनका देन है जो कल्की जैसा मुभि बनानेका हिम्मत राखा । अनुसन्धन किया और फिल्ममे दर्शया । अब साउथका तेलुगु, तामिल और मलायम इण्डष्ट्रि हि भारतिय सिनेमाका इतिहास लेखेगा । अब तो पुष्पा २, कङ्गुवा, Kantara A Legend Chapter-1, KGF 3 जैसा मुभि ने भि बलिउडको धुल चटाने वाला है

FYI :- Kalki isn’t a Bollywood movie! It’s Tollywood

Me

Arjun vs Karna all encounters: 1. Virat war: Arjuna singlehandedly defeated all kaurava warriors including Karna (thrice), Bhishma and Drona and destroyed the entire kuru army alone to save the Matsya kingdom (refer Virata Parvam in Authentic Mahabharat eg: BORI CE) 2. Fight with Gandharvas: Karna was defeated by Gandharva king Chithrasena, captured Duryodhana and Karna fled away. But Arjuna alone defeated Chithrasena and released Duryodhana 3. Panchal war: Karna was defeated along with other Kauravas by Drupada; Arjun defeated and captured Drupada 4. At Draupadi Swayamvar: Karna fought with Arjun but was defeated by Arjun and Karna retreated. 5. Mahabharat war day 14: Arjuna slaughtered the Kaurava army and defeated Karna and Drona while hunting for Jayadratha. Nobody could stand against him on that day. He destroyed 7 akshauhinis that day (refer wikipedia Drona parva) Who is better: 1. Abhimanyu's death: Abhimanyu defeated Karna many times during the war and he was invincible for anyone so he along with 7 other warriors through betrayal jointly attacked him like a coward. But on 17th day Arjun challenged the entire army to protect Karna's son Vrishsena and killed him in front of Karna in one-to-one battle. 2. Arjuna was ambidextrous: He was the only warrior who could use both right and left hand for using weapon 3. Arjuna could aim and shoot upto many kilometers even during night 4. Arjuna was the only warrior to wield the mighty Pashupatastra in dwapara yuga, which could destroy the entire cosmos; the only warrior to fight Lord Shiva and impress him. If you read Kirata parva, Lord Shiva said, that no one except him and lord Vishnu from all the three worlds could defeat Arjuna 5. Arjuna was the only warrior who knew all the five tatvas of Archery( fifth one is the ability to give back life) 6. Dhanur Veda, the holy scripture of archery starts by praising lord Shiva, lord Rama and Arjuna 7. Arjuna singlehandedly killed 30 million Nivatakavachas and Kalakeyas whom even Ravan couldn't defeat 8. Arjuna was Nara, the partial incarnation of lord Vishnu himself. Now coming to the last mentioned arguments: 1. Indra could have given and equally powerful armor(kavach) to Arjuna as he is also a demigod like Surya. He knew the power of his son but wanted to ensure a fair battle as Karna has a divine protection(which ofcourse, is obtained not because of his skill but as a boon). This would make the battle completely based on skills and weapons and not on boons. Just think, many demons got boons by which they could not be killed easily, eg: Hiranyakashipu, Madhu and Kaitab etc. But does that make them more powerful than lord Vishnu, never... just loopholes to escape death. Also he exchanged it for an even more powerful weapon that puts Arjun in more danger. Exchanging one for another is not dana, it is a trade 2. Nagastra has many counter weapons like Garudastra and Arjun had around 130 celestial weapons in his arsenal. According to BORI CE Mahabharat, KMG and Mridananda interpretation of Mahabharat, it was Ashwasena, a snake who lived in Khandava forest in order to take revenge on Arjuna got into Karna's arrow without Karna's knowledge. It was in this situation Krishna saved Arjuna. But when Ashwasena came face to face with Arjuna on the same day, Arjun killed him. 3. Krishna told Arjuna to fire at the time Karna's chariot sunk in soil in order to give respect to curses and make Karna realize his mistake and to remind him of the situation Abhimanyu was in. Krishna used to praise Karna in front of Arjun to make Arjun more aggressive and vengeful and also for not having any head weight so that he can continue sharping his skills even more. Also, it is clearly mentioned in Mahabharat that Drona taught Karna along with Kauravas and Pandavas. Yes, Karna was a student of Drona(just google for yourself). But he was always jealous of Arjuna's skills so he decided to study alone under Parashurama. Also Arjun never got anything with ease, he struggled a lot, he never wanted to be better than Karna, but better than himself. Also Arjun was an epitome of humbleness, kindness and wisdom. He was morally far far greater than anyone else. Remember, it was Karna who ordered the disrobing of Draupadi. For saving the cattle of Brahmins from Thakshak, he entered Draupadi's room to take his bow eventhough he knew that he would have to go for exile, this shows that he was a selfless hero. Also, Karna surrendered himself to Duryodhana the personification of adharma and took part in various evil activities but Arjun surrendered himseelf to Krishna, the supreme lord who gave him the purest of purest the highest knowledge- Bhadavad Gita. Please don't misunderstand me. I am not being biased. I was also a Karna fan, but after studying authentic Mahabharat like BORI CE(most accurate one till known), KMG and Swami Mrudananda interpretation and Srimad Bhagavatham, I got to know the real essence of Mahabharat. Please don't believe in TV serials, they create fake stories to increase their rating. Karna was a good warrior no doubt, but he ended up being a good mango gone bad. Pandavas suffered worst but the had complete faith in dharma and Krishna and followed the right path. But, when society started teasing Karna, he had two ways but he chose the wrong path and got a tragic ending all his skills and valor gone without any use to the society or nation, just he surrendered everything to Duryodhana...and that is the difference. And finally, for those who says Arjuna is nothing without Krishna, we all are nothing without Krishna. He is giving us the power to speak, walk, work and live and without him we are nothing. Krishna was there for everyone including Karna but only Arjun saw the true light of wisdom of Krishna. It is so sad that we live in a society which considers the presence of the supreme lord as a demerit. If we understand Krishna we understand everything including Arjuna...

@arpitchaudhary9268

10 күн бұрын

Krishna arjun is incarnation of great sage nar narayan who defeated dambodhav who has 1000 armour like karn and they literally broke 999 These so called karn fan never understand real history

@avikde9631

10 күн бұрын

Yeah don't know why ppl say karna is better than arjuna when karna couldn't even defeat arjuna once , arjuna was called dhananjaya as he never got defeated by any mortal , the only person who handed arjuna his ass is none other than mahadev himself but then again who can win against lord Shiva ?

Raja Parikshit was right - 🕉️🚩 Kalki really resides in (pro$titution, alcohol,gambling, violence ).We can see it in daily instances.😢

The research that the director and his team have done ❤❤❤

Really what the hell have you researched or read ?? Movie is trying to glorify karna which is one of nonsensical points which you didnt mentioned also in real Arjun was more powerful than karna also arjun defeated karna in one to one battle too, but what in movie mentioned is totally opposite of historic facts but you're promoting movie how you will mention this, don't you ? Movie was juat below avg and you're just trying to promote this movie just based on visuals ? And what about story and manipulation of historic facts or truth ? And first one and half hour was just cringe and boring!! Prabhas acting was just as usual cringe with same as disha... Only interesting character was kali and somewhat ashwathhamas scenes were giving good feel but no movie was below avg only trying to glorify negative characters and also shown shree krishna pushing or kicking ashwathhama back and taking is also not in original Mahabharat, in real there was no gem or mani on ashwathhamas forehead yeah but its ok in here to take creative liberty to show mani on his forehead but all other historic facts are just false and manipulated...

@Dr.MonicaNaik

11 күн бұрын

Bhai koyi Glorification nahi kiya hai ! All director said is ... 1. Karna is Great warrior and people will remember him for generations which is true . Unke aise hi Dhana Veera Shura Karna nahi bulate , It has to mean something right . Mind you this is also Ashwatthama pov , so obviously acchi baat hi bolega nah woh toh karna ke baare meh . That's doesn't mean Arjuna is bad or negative charcter. Infact it will always be Arjuna > Karna no matter what !!! In this movie, context is ... Just as Ashwatthama got a chance for redemption, Karna is also getting a chance of redemption to fight on dharma side in future ( somewhere it is also mentioned in history that , Krishna ji gave this chance to Karna by saying next time whenever Krishna ji ki nayi avatar ayengi , karna will be reborn to fight on good side this time. But I am not exactly sure where it is ) . Because Karna wasn't exactly bad guy . He was on bad side & never opposed bad but he had his reasons for it . And again I am not glorifying Karna here . He was wrong but still a great warrior, so given a chance for redemption. 2. According to movie plot ... Gandiv (Dhanush of Arjuna ) fell into bad hands even before Kalki is born . The only thing that can stop Yaskin with Gandiv from killing Sumati & Kalki is Vijay dhanush ! Doesn't matter how strong Ashwatthama is ... Vijay dhanush can only be active in hands of Karna. So reincarnation of Karna is necessary to stop Yaskin ... So that Kalki will be born & Kali can be ended.

@sohamkale9154

11 күн бұрын

@@Dr.MonicaNaik sorry but I don't agree with your 2nd point in real karna was not only bad side he was bad himself he had so called garv or arrogance and was always jealous of Arjun, and nowhere in original documents it's mentioned that shree krishna told or gave chance karna to do good deeds, also in original Mahabharat there's no mention that ashwathhama had gem or mani on his forehead it's just later addition in regional variations but yeah in here writer can take creative liberty for film but other manipulations are not bareable..

@siddwarriorlive6149

11 күн бұрын

@@sohamkale9154 he was bad sometimes but majority he was good and he is a good guy. its about how you read it or look at it. by the way karn is more powerful than arjun in brut force. and arjun is more powerful than karn in bow and arrow.

@sohamkale9154

11 күн бұрын

@@siddwarriorlive6149 which book have you read ?? As you're saying karna was good guy and all since there's no mention of this in original Mahabharat rather karna was the one of negative character who was always trying to show down to Arjun and was always with duryodhan and shakuni with that plans supporting them without having any issue with those also he was the only supporter during vastraharan of draupadi... Also in any form you say Arjun being younger than karna then also he was more powerful either it be physical which was just similar of them and being greater in archery skills than karna... So bro don't see any serials when it comes to historical references just go and read...

@siddwarriorlive6149

11 күн бұрын

@@sohamkale9154 bro when after krishna died arjuna took dwaraka people and bandits attack but arjun can't remember his matra to use bow and arrow effectively. and he looses and bandits take people with them. here it is shown that arjun is nothing without his bow and arrow. but karn it is mentioned that he has equal strength of 10,000 elephants. so gyan mat pel merko.

Very well explained 🎉❤

Bhai, bada achha video banaya hai, maine bhagwat puran padha hai or 12 we skandh me kaliyug ka perfect warnan kiya hai, sirf picture me itni kamtarta hai ki, kaliyug ka ant 6000 years ke bad dikhaya hai, par bhagwat puran ke nusar kaliyug 4,32,000 years ka hai, jisme se abhi sirf 5224 years ho chuke hai, to abhi kalki avtar hone me 4,27,775 years baki hai

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

According to puranas kaliyug is a very woke world, but in Kalki they potrayed kaliyug as capitalistic world to push communist agenda.

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

If I was the director, I would've potrayed Kaliyug as a very woke ultra lefist world which is dominated by women, trans people, black people, lower caste people, gays and muslims etc who treat all others as slaves.

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

If I was the director, I would've potrayed Kaliyug as a very woke ultra lefist world where people are enslaved by women, trans people, black people, lower caste people, gays and muslims.

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

Why would a very outspoken leftie like Kamal Hassan agree to do pro hindu/pro Indian culture movie? I think there is a communist agenda. I think Pratik Borade was right, instead of showing Kaliyug as a woke world they showed Kaliyug as a world of evil capitalists.

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

Why would a very outspoken leftie like Kamal Hassan agree to do pro hindu/pro Indian culture movie? I think there is a communist agenda, I think Pratik Borade was right, instead of showing Kaliyug as a woke world they showed Kaliyug as a world of capitalism.

glorification of karna was needless he was no competition for arjuna...Arjuna was the greatest amongst the warriors.. it would be bad precedent and narrative

@nerisalobo

5 күн бұрын

Movie is from Ashwathama's perspective and he would never consider Arjun better than Karna. And frankly even I don't think Arjun was thr best, if he were then he wouldn't need Krishna as his charioteer to babysit him 24x7 telling him what to do. So much for being the best huh?

Perfect said...... I was wondering is there nobody who will speak the truth..... Thank you

@The_Cinema_Lover_

4 күн бұрын

This movie is also misrepresentating mahabaratha, the beginning and climax kurushetra scene is not mentioned in any scriptures. According to puranas kaliyug is a very woke world, but in Kalki they potrayed kaliyug as capitalistic world to push communist agenda. Just think why would a powerful God like Krishna need a bodyguard like Ashwathama? Also there's no scripture of Krishna glorifying Karna or removing Ashwathama's stone. According to Puranas Kalki's father name is Vishnuyashas and in the movie Kali's name is Yaskin, in Kalki 2 if they showed Kalki's father as Yaskin, then it'll he just another hinduphobic movie.

I believe that since story is being told by ashwathama, he might be showing his pov to the child, actual story shayad baad me koi aur bataaye

Appreciate your Honest Review.

This is not a Bollywood movie.. this is a Tollywood movie 🎬