Should Iqbal’s Reconstruction lectures be a part of the academics?

@badalgayainsaan

3 жыл бұрын

Absolutely ... Now needed more than ever

@MegaMindKhan

3 жыл бұрын

Most definitely, sir.

@JamiatUlmaPakistan

3 жыл бұрын

کیوں نہیں ؟

@faheemahmadofficial7701

3 жыл бұрын

yes please ask imran khan

@ms_ADAM

3 жыл бұрын

off course! how could this kind of question even come to mind? need to stop paying attention to low minds

Proud to be a student of sir Qamar Iqbal Truly an intellectual

Proud to be his student at FFCB laiken agar sir itne pyar se class m parhatay to kia he baat hoti...;}

@piho-thecat2119

3 жыл бұрын

Knsa batch hai apka?

@uzairmughal4976

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, I think it all glitters on KZread. He was very well-informed teacher though

@someone11233

2 жыл бұрын

Alhamdullilah Me too,

@darapsteradox

2 жыл бұрын

Me too

@hurriyatali705

3 ай бұрын

Me too

It was a revolutionary work by Allama . Wish we as nation could develop on the work .

TCM Originals is a beauty. ❤️

I was his student. Dr Qamar Iqbal is a great and a mature person ❤

Mohammed Iqbal was a brillant philosopher as well as famous poet. In this book, he lays out a strong case that religious thought in Islam has been in stagnation for some 500 years, and this does a disservice to the real and dynamic meaning to the Quran. Iqbal was writing at a time when he was trying to both (a) inspire fellow Muslims in India, circa 1930s) to rise to the occasion to defend their religious and political rights as an independent India was going to emerge, and (b) to promote pan-Islamic conscientiousness and cooperation- a type of League of Nations. While the text of the book is complex, he presents fascinating arguments and backs his assertions with numerous references and interpretations of the Quran as well as from noted Islamic and western scholars. Iqbal argues that the Quran offers Muslims an opportunity for a journey in person growth and spirituality which is unique and evolutionary, and yet unites the faithful in a deep spiritual communion with God. Although a demanding reading trek, the effort to study, rather than just try to read, this book, all said done, is very worthwhile.

The actual problem is that we tend to confuse "ideological modernism" with "technological modernism".

@AliHasan-us4jq

3 жыл бұрын

Please explain both

@ZubairAhmed-od2xv

2 жыл бұрын

Spot on, but unfortunately over their heads. Hind was lost to the zindiqs and mulhids a long time ago.

He's my teacher , proud of him

Very informative Channel. Good work

Dr. Sb was the man of intuition.

Great,ijtehaad is the most important theory of islam

Thank you.

So Enlightening! Also, thank you for the English subs!

Sir Qamar Iqbal ❤️

I studied from Sir Qamar Iqbal , very intelligent personality 😊

I was also his student What a great man Sir qamar iqbal Salute you sir

Good work!

Exactly Well explained sir

Iqbal the uber genius what a great work for islamic world till the end of this world.

I am very proud that Sir Qamar Iqbal is principle of my college

بہترین سحمجھایا ہے سر

There is a great need of reconstruction of islamic thought,n ijtehaad is the base of this,ijtehaad is the most important chapter of islam

Proud to be student of sir qamar Iqbal

Allan Iqbal lectures on the reconstruction of Islam should definitely added in syllabus instead of Goodbye Mr Chips.Otherwise next generations will b come atheists.

Great

wow....👌👌👌👌

Iqbal Iqbal💗

Proud to a student of sir

Our teacher from ffcb rawalpindi❤️

Which version of "The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam" is Mr. Qamar talking about? . Iqbal presents NO PROOF for the existence of God or the objective reality of the religion experience in these lectures. Iqbal only points out that these ideas and experiences have been very helpful in the past in the evolution of man and should not be rejected out of hand. It is really sad to see how low the level of intellectual ability of these so called Iqbal scholars is in Pakistan. Wohi Meri Kam Naseebi, Wohi Teri Be Niazi Mere Kaam Kuch Na Aya Ye Kamal-e-Ne Nawazi Mein Kahan Hun Tu Kahan Hai, Ye Makan Ke La-Makan Hai? Ye Jahan Mera Jahan Hai Teri Karishma Sazi Issi Kashmakash Mein Guzreen Meri Zindagi Ki Raatain Kabhi Souz-o-Saaz-e-Rumi, Kabhi Paich-o-Taab-e-Razi Iqbal mentions in the preface that: "It must, however, be remembered that there is no such thing as finality in philosophical thinking. As knowledge advances and fresh avenues of thought are opend, other views, and probably sounder views than those set forth in these Lectures, are possible. Our duty is carefully to watch the progress of human thought, and to maintain an independent critical attitude towards it. " Does this seem like the advice from some one who has found the ultimate proof for the existence of God?

@irfanmehmood1602

3 жыл бұрын

That very person Mr.Qamar is Ph.D scholar of Iqbaliat. I would say R.I.P Iqbaliat. Such a nonsense analysis of Reconstruction of Religious thought. And i wonder where scientist ever said that everything is coincidence, this is purely religious fanatics approach.

@beluga2841

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly

@beluga2841

3 жыл бұрын

Infact the text is rife with inconsistencies, philosophically speaking. He was a poetic, this text is also poetic. It should be read that way

@Avicerox

Жыл бұрын

@Maria Azam Very true, though, I don't see the so called Philosophical inconstancies people talk about in that book, if anything, his Poetry enriches his Philosophy.

Im from Chennai and we never knew Iqbal has visited south India

our ex principal such a great principal miss you sir

What a great discussion on very important aspects of Islamic thoughts. The way Dr. Qamar Iqbal sb explained all this, was really comprehensive and mind cathing. Appreciate it.

اقبالؔ بھی ’اقبال‘ سے آگاہ نہیں ہے کچھ اس میں تمسخر نہیں، واﷲ نہیں ہے

Second because Allah is first.

Proud to be a student of Sir Qamar Iqbal. A true legend FFCB 💙

@fazchistii1418

Жыл бұрын

Who is he and where does he teach?

❤❤❤

The concept of creation of Pakistan was first given by Allama Iqbal .

♥️♥️

Ullema was saying when written shikwa and after he writes jawab e shikaw then Ullema said he is angels and freedom fighters. Please correct it. He has follower of Allama Anwar Kashmiri

@tehseenjaved2100

2 жыл бұрын

you saying right brother i agree

❤❤❤Iqbal❤❤❤

Every Video is whether Islam Or Ulmas or to target Ulmas✋

کیا سپیس اور ٹائم میں تبدیلی زاویہء نگاہ سے پیدا ہوتی ہے؟

@Avicerox

Жыл бұрын

Is baat ka kia is mozu se taluq?

There are many hadith supporting ijtehad and Qias too

Dr. Sahib, Ager aap explain ker detay ke kis tara Einstein's ki theory Frishtay aur ALLAH kaa wajood saabat kerti hay...tou buhoot achha hota. Aap ne sirf Iqbal ko quot kiya hay

kash yai sab all ilamic poarties smjai

Kya ap point out kr skty han.kis ny ftway lgae thay. Ulama pur hur cheez ka mlba daal dea jata ha or misconceptions pelai jati han..agr ijtehad nahi ho raha to qrar daad e mqasid kesy wajud ma a gae. Islami banking or sharea court Pakistan ma kesy aa gy? Wazaahat farmae.

My teacher at fauji foundation college rwp

Hamara sab se bara masla is the paradox of the jahil "ulema"

ری کنسٹرکشن آف ریلجس تھاٹ ان اسلام علامہ اقبال کی تصنیف ہے ۔۔۔۔ کیا یہ معلومات درست ہیں

Professor sb could not elucidate to make his point. Muslim jurists already gave the idea of Ijtihad, so what is special about IQBAL's idea?

@MegaMindKhan

3 жыл бұрын

Bro, iqbal was not the pioneer of ijtihad, he was its advocate. The concept of ijtihad had been sidelined after the fall of Baghdad in 1258 A.D. It was not until the 18th century that its revival took place. We lost an era.....

@naeemiqbal4875

3 жыл бұрын

IQBAL was not of the view , that molvis conduct ijtihad but he gives this privilege to legislative assembly which is the modern form of constitutionalism. As IQBAL states: “The transfer of the power of Ijtihad from individual representatives of schools to a Muslim legislative assembly which, in view of the growth of opposing sects, is the only possible form Ijma can take in modern times, will secure contributions to legal discussion from laymen who happen to possess a keen insight into affairs.”

@fh-cn5io

3 жыл бұрын

Aaj ke maulvi ko fasaad krne se kaha fursat, ye kab Ijtihaad krne lgey. Inko 15th cen ki fiqh ke siwa padhaya hi kch nhi hai aur aap inse najaane kya kya umeeden liye baithey hain.

Kya yeah Iqbal ke book "Reconstruction of Islamic thoughts" ka review/analysis ha .yeah just koi discussion ha

Ulma ko ab rehnay dai jitna es profession nay Islam ko nuqsaan Pohanchaya ha. Termites ke trah. Itehad ummat ko mumkin bnao apni har mumkin koshish se. Waslaam

pakistan k ulema ne reconstruction ko bilkul nai prha hua hota...

Could you kindly explain the existence of God, as you referred Iqbal' s notion. While the holy Quran does not support the existence of God since He is beyond existence and human comprehension

Mujhe laga mujhe Urdu ati hai, lekin iss poori video mai mujhe english subtitles ka shara lena para.

If Islam permits Ijtehhad and Qiyas. Then those who oppose these actions are against Islam?

@shaheazampaklio4140

2 жыл бұрын

Our ulema

Ijtihad aur qayas har aam aadmi ke liye nahi hai

Urdu alag bol raha hai... English captions alag bayan karta hai...

duniya main aisa ek bhi ek bhi banda job kar raha ho yaan job karta bhi tha science ke illava mumkin hi nhi hain na hi tha stone age main log job nhi karte the na hi kapde pehante the.aapki body par jisko hijjab kehte hain science ne hi diya hain yahan tak ki cotton bhi science se possible hain

@Ahmed-ii7up

2 жыл бұрын

Well said

@Avicerox

Жыл бұрын

Kisi ne nahin kaha Science choro aur Stone age main jao, ye yakkiyan kisi aur ko sunao.

اجتہاد علامہ اقبال کی ایک رائے تھی اور بعد میں اس رائے سے علامہ اقبال نے رجوع بھی فرمایا تھا

Aisi baat nhi ha bhai. Ulema bhi ijtihad k qail hain.

@fh-cn5io

3 жыл бұрын

Agar sach m qail hotey to aaj bhi 15th cen ki fiqh ko aaj ke maslon m naa ghuserte. Sirf kahne ki hadd tak to maana jaa skta hai lekn ground reality is vry different.

@user-jt4jh9nk2o

3 жыл бұрын

@@fh-cn5io بھای صاحب آپ تعصب کا چشمہ اتار کر بات کو سمجھیں۔ اجتہاد کہتے ہی نئے پیدا شدا مسائل کو قران و سنت کی روشنی میں حل کرنا۔ لیکن میرے خیال سے آپ نے reconstruction of religious thought in islam پڑھی ہی نہیں ہے۔ اگر پڑھی ہوتی تو آپ کو معلوم ہوتا کہ اس میں بعض غلطیاں موصوف نے ایسی کیں ہیں جن پر نکیر لازم ہے۔ اور غلطی انسان ہی سے ہوتی ہے چاہے وہ کتنا بڑا فلسفی یا علامہ ہی کیوں نہ ہو۔ اقبال انسان ہی تو تھے ۔ نبی رسول تو نہیں تھے۔ میں بذات خود اقبال کا بہت بڑا مداح ہوں اور میری بچی کو کلیات کے اکثر اشعار اور غزلیں ازبر ہیں ۔ حالانکہ وہ سائینس کی طالبہ ہے ۔لیکن ہم اقبال کو اقبال ہی مانتے ہیں ۔ جو کہ انسان تھے اور انسان سے غلطی ہو سکتی ہے۔

Koun se ulama ne Iqbal ra ko ijtihad per bath karne se hi kafir kaha batadena tha

Please don't call a class of ulema as ulema.One class does not represent the complete community and even if you believe in this then please apply it in all the fields.

This is what happens trying to create which doesn't exists at all

@email3335

3 жыл бұрын

1300 saal tuk kis Ki ghulaami krty rahy ho?? It was there Will be there again

Bro what version of Reconstruction in religious thoughts you read?? What a dumb analysis, you definitely didn't got the point what really Iqbal was talking in his book. He didn't criticized any western scientists , Iqbal's main point was to how we can merge our faith and desire and change with the world. Other part of your analysis are right as Iqbal wanted Muslims to get out of theory and explore the real world.

Islam is anti classical?prove according to iqbal reconstruction of religious thought...

And there millions of jahil "mureeds" that are willing to burn, mame and kill in the name of religion. Even if they are burning their own home and killing and maming their own country men and brothers in islam. Bas kar do ye jahalat, curtail your sense of self righteousness. Duniya main logon ke faislay nahi karo, shirk nahi karo. Sirf hamara rab faislay karnay wala hai... Is duniya main tum kisi ka faisla nahi kar sakte ... Ye shirk hai.

@Avicerox

Жыл бұрын

What lol?

@badalgayainsaan

Жыл бұрын

@@Avicerox what lol?

@Avicerox

Жыл бұрын

@@badalgayainsaan Kisi ka faisla karna shirk hai? Ye keh kar kia tum bazat e khud aik faisla nahin de rahay?

@badalgayainsaan

Жыл бұрын

@@Avicerox creating confusion and using trickery with words are the tools of the devil ... When it's clearly mentioned in the Quran that Allah will judge us for our deeds on the judgement day then who are you to judge someone before that .... The prophet (saw) said only Allah knows the intentions of the heart then who are you to claim to know what's in someone's heart ... You can try to create confusion and inject your thoughts in God's word but in the end you will regret it but then it will be too late. Only the creator can judge his creation for the final exam, even you, which apparently be doing the work of the devil, might end up passing the final exam ... We don't know... That's Allah's prerogative

Allama iqbal aaj peda hotay to ye ullema kab ka blasphemy ka ilzam laga k qatl kr chukay hotay. Funny that we were more free to have an opinion in British india than in pakistan

Mullan kia janay iqbal koooooooo

That very person Mr.Qamar is Ph.D scholar of Iqbaliat. I would say R.I.P Iqbaliat. Such a nonsense analysis of Reconstruction of Religious thought. And i wonder where scientist ever said that everything is coincidence, this is purely religious fanatics approach.

@Avicerox

Жыл бұрын

No, actual scientists did not say everything is coincidence, this is a minority opinion, but idiotic people and atheists who claim monopoly on science massively believe this, this is not a "purely religious fanatics approach" but rather a reply to a fanatic atheistic view.

🤣😂😆😅😅😅

science ne aaj millions of people ko jobs di huyi hain yahan tak ki aaj 21st century main agar science na hoti toh na hi kahin iqbal hote na hi koi majhab na hi majhabi baatein bcz aap kis pen se kis kitab par likhte aur yeh banda jo interview record kar aur karwa raha hain kya karta yeh jo banda majhabi baatein suit boot pehan kar kar raha hain insaani dushman hain sabse bade khud western aur aawam ko majhabi banate hain

@Ahmed-ii7up

2 жыл бұрын

Thats right

@Avicerox

Жыл бұрын

Science to tab bhi thi, science ke honay ya na honay ka is behas se kia taluq hai? Khud westerner? Janaab science aur technology main west se madad lo, lekin unko abu na banao.

علماء نہیں مولویوں کی بات کررہے ہیں آپ۔

Janabe aali, iqbal sahib ne kya kahe the nehi pataa but yeh nazria Arya's sanaji wale pahle se kah chuke jis k jawaab mei hazrat masih maud(as)ne kitab Qadian k Arya aur Hum mei saabit kie k iss Qaaenaat ka eik Rab (Khudda) hai koi cheez apne aap nehi bane hain. Iqbal sb ne 1924 ya 1928 mei lecture die k jaise koi teer mar lie. Kyonki aap logon hasad aur bugz hai ahmadion se aur hazrat masih maud(as)ku inkar kar chuke ho toh kabhi rahe hidayat nehi paa sakte ho. Taasub aur bugz deel se nikalo aur hazrat masih maud(as)ka kitaab parhe hidayat paa jaaoge. Khudda taala tumhe hidayat dei.amin.

CRIMES OF ISLAM AGAINST WOMEN! 1-Islam has demeaned, degraded, and subjugated women for eternity. 2-Muhammad claimed in Sura 4:34 that Allah prefers men over women because men have an advantage over women in knowledge, and reason, and also because men spend their money on women. ( but Muhammad forgot to mention that when he was a penniless young man, an old businesswoman, Khadija bint Khuwalid, hired him to work for her, and later married him. She paid all the household bills. which also means she supported him financially as long as she lived ). 3-Muhammad further claimed in Sura 4:34 that men are in charge to discipline women and keep them in check. In case any woman is suspected of being disobedient, the follower should give her a warning, stop sleeping with her, and finally beat her. but if she starts obeying then he should beat her no more, which also means keep beating her until she obeys. 4-Muhammad claimed in Sura 2:282 that the two female witnesses are equal to one male witness in a Sharia court. 5-Muhammad claimed that the daughter gets only half of the son's share, sura 4:11/4:12/4:176 6-Muhammad gave men the right to divorce their wives just by saying 3 times the words "I divorce you". while women have to file for khula, which is a kind of request for a divorce. the husband still has the ultimate right to accept or deny that request or khula. 7-Muhammad allowed men to marry up to 4 women if they treat them equally, divorce any of them or all of them at will with or without any reason, without any consequences, and marry new ones right away. 8-Muhammad allowed his followers to maintain harems full of young women. the Harems included wives, concubines, girls captured in the battle, and slave girls, sura 4:03/4:24/33:50. 8a- Muta and its wonderful benefits to mankind: Fearing to be outdone, outwitted, outsmarted, outgunned, and outnumbered by Sunnis, my Shia brothers came out with the idea of temporary marriage called Muta, where everything is similar to misyar, but muta is easier than misyar. Under Muta, you can marry a girl for an hour, a day, a week, a month, a year, or more. when you marry a girl for an hour and you walk out of the room after performing your duties as a husband, your marriage is automatically dissolved and no sin is committed by you. This was the only reason almost all the Nawabs in British India converted to Shia. But the purpose of both, Misyar and Muta, was and still is to facilitate the lust of the rich and powerful and to lure the general masses to join their death cult. There is no difference between prostitution, Muta, and misyar. 8b-the Shia govt. of Iran and Iraq are encouraging their citizens to marry baby girls. it recently passed a law that says a man can marry a girl under the age of nine with the permission of her parents, but no permission is necessary if the girl is over the age of nine. 8c- Fearing not to be outnumbered by Shia brothers, who allow their followers the benefits of muta, the Sunnis came out with the idea of misyar marriage, where you can temporarily marry any girl anywhere and as many girls as you can afford without any permanent responsibility. misyar marriage is automatically dissolved when the contract expires, but the husband can also dissolve misyar at any time. he does have to pay an agreed amount to his misyar wife at the time of signing the contract. she does not get anything else when a misyar marriage is unilaterally dissolved by the husband. wife has no right to dissolve misyar. 9-Muhammad himself set the example of harems. he had between 23 to 37 women in his harem depending on which hadith you believe. Please read the book “ 23 Years” by famous Iranian writer Ali Dashti. 10- Muhammad allowed his followers to marry baby girls. Muhammad himself set the precedent by marrying a 6-year-old baby Ayesha and sleeping with her when she was only nine. 11- Muhammad allowed his followers to buy and sell slaves, have sex with slave girls without any responsibility or commitment, and take female captives after the battle as booty and have sex with them, sell them in the market, or trade them with other soldiers. 12-due to the demonic and discriminatory Sharia law, women in Islamic countries are still being subjugated, abused, exploited, beaten, tortured, and killed. Zulfiqar Tareen, a friend of all, the enemy of none.

@smofficialeducation

6 ай бұрын

Shut up. After following Islam, I got Peace. We don't want your Godless Science, we are happy with Islam 😊😅 Because we love peace of souls not your nihilism. 🤣🤣🤣😂 @ 10 Jan 2024 @ 10:37 AM

اقبال کی ساری باتیں بے دلیل ہیں۔

Iqbal was Ahmadi (Qadiani) till 1931... Iqbal remained in conflict with M. Jinnah till few years before his death... Why books do not tell us the exact truth???

@its.ekramah

3 жыл бұрын

Any proof??? Or refrence???

@darveshzamindar

3 жыл бұрын

Rubbish , his forefathers were Kashmiri Pandits who migrated to Punjab and embraced Sunni Islam .

@usmansakhi9973

3 жыл бұрын

@@darveshzamindar Truth is always rubbish for morons... Get some unbiased excerpts about his life. His son's family (from eldest wife) are Ahmadi.

@Avicerox

Жыл бұрын

Lol, Iqbal himself wrote an essay calling Qadiyanis kafir 🤣keep crying.

Great