Lark's C1 & M1 wireless microphones are just about as convenient as possible! Check them out using the links below! Check out the Lark C1 for iPhone & Android ➡ amzn.to/3eJovlp Check out the Lark M1 with 3.5mm jack ➡ amzn.to/3I1cVMV The Camera I used➡ geni.us/9Jr3 The Lens ➡ geni.us/ZzssUt5 Crazy memory card ➡ geni.us/AiBD2dO

@kreigerbailey3550

Жыл бұрын

Portland, JAMAICA in the Building!!

@MarioPalomera

Жыл бұрын

That camera (Sony) deserves at least an 1.8 lens but great comparison as always

@Variable_Degree_Series

Жыл бұрын

Unfair comparison..Iphones aren't even the best camera phone and you are comparing them with alpha 1?? Also, what you don't see is that there is a huge detail difference between the two..No pro is gonna use a smartphone you know..the difference in reality is huge..I bet not a single photo that the alpha 1 takes is not far better than a smartphone..Also, you can't just comment on colour science either..For normal people, smartphones are great..but not for pros.. Don't know why this bullshit is going on in YT.. Also, the sensor is not way better than Samsung's and also, the Samsung S23 Ultra is gonna come this January so wait for that isheep!

I’m just imagining a DSLR with an A16 chip inside of it with all the crazy processing power. That would be insane!

@dinervc9582

Жыл бұрын

U mean A16?

@thewizardguy1337

Жыл бұрын

iCamera

@antifern0

Жыл бұрын

@@dinervc9582 Yes, I lost count haha

@lazyname4130

Жыл бұрын

overprocessing* power :P

@Lordbyronq

Жыл бұрын

Big sensor + quality glass + A16 + computational photography = new category?

I hate to say this, but iPhone HDR in photos are so aggressive nowadays they resemble how Samsung did HDR several years back. The output is just so tone-mapped with lows brought up so much and highlights brought down, making the image lean towards being flat.

@raven3696

Жыл бұрын

iPhone’s HDR in images isn’t as aggressive when you compare it to the Mi 12 Ultra or the S22 Ultra. They go so far that they look even flatter

Now being able to zoom into KZread video’s it’s much better, because you don’t have to only choose by dynamic range, but also can also zoom to see it in detail

The camera on the iphone is amazing. Where the Sony comes up ahead is the smoothness in blur in relation to depth of field.

As someone that has both a sony camera and the iphone 13 pro I almost always prefer the sony A1 in this video. The iphone’s details are over sharpened to a point where it’s losing colors and saturation, and also it makes all kinds of details appear in the same ‘level’ (as in some details should be more visible to the eye than others but the iphone make it all the same)

@zeedan94

Жыл бұрын

yes exactly, I can't deny the fact that computational photography works magic for handheld low light photos, but realistically speaking you simply cannot treat a professional camera as a point and shoot and expect amazing photos all the time, the advantage of mirrorless or DSLRs is in their versatility, you're shooting something far away get a telephoto lens, you're shooting in low light get a fast lens, you like how phone photos look set highlights to -100, shadows to +100, and crank the sharpness to the max. A big mistake I believe Max made for lowlight photos with the Sony is not shooting at the right exposure and cranking up the shadows which kills the quality of an image. Given the proper technique/lens, I am positive that a 10 year old DSLR would still beat the latest and greatest from any phone manufacturer.

@fread222

Жыл бұрын

@@Mehwhatevr One of the greatest advantages of a professional camera system is the lens selection it offers. Yet in the comparison he mostly uses plain 24mm when there are lenses ranging from super ultrawide to extreme telephoto which provide unique perspectives that simply cannot be done on the iphone. In comparisons involving zooms, he also simply crops massively into the a1 instead of using lenses with longer focal lengths, effectively making it a tiny cropped sensor comparable to that on the iphone but without the computational photography. He also for some reason refuses to open up the aperture to f/4+ in most of the photos, where the depth of field would be incredibly apparent. Instead he sticks to f11~ which greatly limits the light capturing ability of the camera in order to make it "comparable" to the iphone's physically much smaller sensor and aperture. This comparison is limiting and restraining the mirrorless on all fronts and this could very easily confuse viewers into thinking iphone camera has equal if not better image quality, when that is clearly not the case in 2022, at least not right now.

@neilr7935

Жыл бұрын

@@fread222 minor correction: stopping down refers to increasing the f-stop number.

@Kris-nf3fu

Жыл бұрын

@@fread222 I didn’t notice all that. Thx for mentioning. I feel better about my gh5 now lol

@fread222

Жыл бұрын

@@neilr7935 thanks for the reminder!

for casual photography, the iphone wins but for creative and pro works, nothing can beat a dedicated camera

@cristibaluta

Жыл бұрын

@@gtwester F2.8 lenses is where they start to put good glass, even F4 on zooms. I use a 35 2.8 lens and the images are miles away from the iphone, i have an Xs though. I sometimes post series of photos on instagram and i want to beat myself for not using my camera more often.

@xalvarez07

Жыл бұрын

Yeah but it's not 10x better nor is it worth 10x more.

@xalvarez07

Жыл бұрын

@@cristibaluta lol Xs obviously it's miles better...

@xalvarez07

Жыл бұрын

@@Mehwhatevr lol I don't think you understood what I meant. What I meant was there's no point comparing it to a "Xs" because it's drastically different and much older.

@xalvarez07

Жыл бұрын

@@gtwester lol I don't think you got what I meant either. Refer to the reply above.

here you go! ! ! Very helpful to me, thanks for sharing.

I placed an order for IPhone 14 Pro Max last week. To get photos this sharp and amazing are you shooting in the Pro Raw mode?

I love this kind of video. More of these please!!

The reason why the A1 couldn’t focus is because you didn’t use the slower focus mode, in that mode the A1 can focus in literally no light and I’ve tried it. Also who uses a zoom in low light. I would usually use the 20mm 1.8 or the 50mm 1.2 which can gather over 4 times more light than the f2.8.

@kovy689

Жыл бұрын

The iPhone would still smash it regardless.

@KOKOBC

Жыл бұрын

@@kovy689 I hope you’re being sarcastic

@kovy689

Жыл бұрын

@@KOKOBC Why would I be?

@Oilcommunist

Жыл бұрын

You are right. After I watched this video, I realized that these people do not know how to use a mirrorless camera, especially in poor lighting conditions. But even after that, I saw a difference in favor of SONY in 90% of the photos. Colors and details are sooo much better on Sony. Optics and sensor size matters.

@KOKOBC

11 ай бұрын

@@Oilcommunist ikr, lighting is everything, even one of those small pocket sized lighting setup would make a massive difference

Wow this is crazy! A tiny sensor & a good software combo helps the iPhone punch above its weight class when it comes to photo/video.

@Epicgamer_Mac

Жыл бұрын

The sensor is still way smaller than the pro camera, but it’s really not tiny anymore. The iPhone 13 Pro actually got a pretty large sensor and the 14 Pro is actually 65% larger than the 13 Pro, going from 1/1.65” to 1/1.28”. 1-inch iPhone sensors aren’t far away.

@Epicgamer_Mac

Жыл бұрын

Not disagreeing with your observations by the way, but just thought I’d point that out

Thank you guys!

Most of the "bad" ones for the Sony A1 where just because you couldnt focus for some reason hah. Were you using the A1 like a point and shoot?

@RJTVision

Жыл бұрын

maybe the point is "which is more suitable for casuals". any pro photographer could easily use the A1 and smoke the iPhone 38/38 of the time lol

@004vamsi

Жыл бұрын

@@RJTVision Sony A1 is $7000, no “ casual “ is gonna get that cam. This is good but ultimately pointless. You don’t get DSLR to point and shoot.

@Jilsonsecklertiu

Жыл бұрын

This is very true, especially the ones the they edited to brighten up the highlights to pop the subjects more. Not an accurate comparison.

@haruyanto8085

5 ай бұрын

​@@RJTVisionthe fact that a 9000 USD camera can't even do point and shoot or requires a long setup is extremely disappointing, it's like paying for a F1 car to drive on the public roads

I love these videos where all of you are expressing opinions 😍 make us realize we all can have a different point of view and be happy 😊

02:14 It's about where you look. The right camera has better blurred background, but the left one did a great job making main object super interesting and I didn't even notice the artifacts until they were pointed out. So left one for sure. If I looked at it on Instragram, the center of the frame would be the only point I look at.

You guys should do a proraw48mp vs 12mp HEIC comparison. It’s a massive difference.

Can you tell me what settings you were using for the iPhone?

You guys did a great job 👏

14:19 you know it’s an iPhone trademark when you see that green dot on an image you shot 😂😂😂

That’s insane. I took my first night shot last night of the clouds and I was blown away how well the 14 pro did. The camera is a solid justification for keeping this phone.

@Variable_Degree_Series

Жыл бұрын

Have you heard of Google Pixel, Vivo X80pro, Xiaomi 12SUltra and all?? Don't overrate it by saying it's amazing.. Though it's a balanced camera but not at all the best for photos..

@2cats1guy

Жыл бұрын

@@Variable_Degree_Series no, never heard of them. I have no desire to switch from being an iPhone user of 15 years to android just for a camera.

@Variable_Degree_Series

Жыл бұрын

@@2cats1guy you never heard of Google pixel?? Wow you must live under a rock.. I just pointed that iphone doesn't exactly do well in night shots and as you said, the camera is a solid justification.. Anyways, you used a Ford for 15 years doesn't mean it just drives well as compared to a BMW.. Also, it's not like Android has just the 'camera'.. I don't have any issue..Use whatever you want but don't write invalid statements..

@lordofallpotatoes4336

Жыл бұрын

@@Variable_Degree_Series it is true that the night shots of the google pixel do look awesome because of the AI and max 10 mins exposure time. But I have to disagree that its strictly better because it all comes down to preference, the pixel makes lights look extremely realistic whereas the iphone brings out the vibrance of the colours and lights in the night, so the pics are entirely subjective. Plus, you can also edit the pics after, thus making the difference negligible. From an objective perspective, the iphone cameras are... 100% Good Enough!

@Variable_Degree_Series

Жыл бұрын

@@lordofallpotatoes4336 well then according to your taste, S22 ultra is better.. Atleast it doesn't over highlight the shadows due to which the photos looks flat..(iphones) and not to mention the warm auto white balance..sometimes it's just too warm..yes you can edit the pics..but if you take many pics, how long do you plan to edit..the flat shadows on iphones are really bad..I mean in some photos it just too much and the zoom is poor..S22 ultra is exceptional however even pixel is great..but yeah iphones are 100% fine in terms of camera..and so are all the flagships..for that price, it is very much expected.. however iphones are by far not the best for photos..videos are exceptional only on iphone and Samsung S series..but pixels are good too.. Considering Pixel 7 pro will cost $650 after one or two months (even on the launch, if you exclude the price of pixel watch provided free with Pixel 7 pro, The pixel 7 pro costs only $550, it's very worth the price..) Samsung and apple cost more and so they have better video performance..but for photos, pixel is great..the details are unmatched..the computational photography is amazing and the magic eraser works like a charm..(Samsung also has a good magic eraser and a photo remaster as well).

Great work, Thank you.

Great review and in most respects not surprising . I have done similar tests with my Sony A7R3 and iPhone and in many respects the iPhone takes very similar or even "better" photos (highlight and shadow retention of detail, and skies not blown out!) than the Sony A7R3. And when you add in size, weight, (carrying different lenses and batteries, flashgun,) convenience etc and even safety while away on holiday, I will almost always only take the iPhone now and I have just upgraded to the iPhone 14 Prom Max from the 12PM. I certainly don't want to spend time doing PP tweaks after a holiday bringing out details etc. I simply don't have the time !Why don't cameras have inbuilt computational software IF you want to use it?

It’s actually pretty impressive that iPhone can even come anywhere close to the professional camera, although it obviously falls short in most of the areas like: oversharpened image, being slightly too aggressive with HDR imo, crappy fake blur especially on thin details like hair or grass strands, mediocre lens coating that flares, generally bad low light (besides that one portrait photo). It’s definitely a decent camera to always have with you, but it’s no replacement for a real camera, and it doesn’t even need to be a $9K one.

@life_in_gen

Жыл бұрын

I agree

I appreciate how much work y'all do for this type video. Thank you so much. Question for you, on the 14 Pro what is the main lens that you prefer? Do you just go by the situation or do you have a go to?

I used my DSLR on a pregnancy photo shoot and one my friends took his iPhone 14 Pro and took a few pictures and I was blown away how easy it was to snap the phone at look identical to my DSLR shots and better in others.

you guys make great comparison video, awesome video

I’ve got Sony 30/38, iPhone 8/38, and I’m not even a snob for photography or whatever. I don’t really like the over sharpened look. Might be ok on a phone screen, but “sharpness” doesn’t mean details. Also, something like Sony a7m4 for 1/3 price would do much better in those lowlight scenarios, because A1 isn’t a lowlight camera by any means. Would be cool though if modern cameras could quickly stack photos like iPhones do.

My only complaint for iPhone videos is still that green alien light flare thing (which happens when you point to a direct light source). Other than that, it is almost perfect.

@mootsym

Жыл бұрын

it's inexcusable apple can't figure that out. Android phones have been done with floating green orbs for years. Really spoils a great night shot honestly.

@marcusravi1684

Жыл бұрын

Its caused by diffraction of light passing through the sapphire crystal lenses. Trying to correct it would require majorly updating their image processing software or using a cheaper lens like Samsung. Apple makes world class hardware, but it sucks at making world class software.

@mootsym

Жыл бұрын

@@marcusravi1684 Samsung, pixel and apple all have pros and cons when I look at pic comparisons... most of it having to do with processing. Yet there's no ridiculous ghosts and green orbs on the galaxy night shots. I'm sure apple could figure it out.

@definingslawek4731

Жыл бұрын

@@mootsym I've seen ghosting/ orbs on every phone. It happens on pro cameras too, you'll see it in movies like the dark knight.

@definingslawek4731

Жыл бұрын

@@marcusravi1684 Apple uses small, cheap plastic lenses like everyone else. That's why on an iphone, or any phone for that matter, if you turn off in camera sharpening you'll notice how nothing is really sharp even though it's technically 'in focus.' Apple does have a 'sapphire' cover over the cameras but that's not really the lens.

You guys need to mention on photo which is left and which one is right, thanks 😊

can you make a comparison between iphone 13 ,14 all the pro and non pro versions side by side , it would be great to see that.

I really enjoyed these blind test comparisons, the only thing is a laptop screen at even full screen per picture is way to small to come to a proper judgement let alone split screen, you should do these with at least a 30 inc monitor and above to get a better understanding of sharpness and over sharpness and fine detail, all of those things are very compressed on a small laptop. Thanks keep up the good work 👌

This game is a lot more fun guessing which picture was taken by which camera.

@daniel_960_

Жыл бұрын

Quite easy one

Can you do a comparison between the M2 iPad and Intel i7 Surface pro 9?

Can someone explain what pro camera features are limited to only pro models with 256gb + storage.

we can't deny there's a ton of oversharpening with the iphone. I love the 48mpxl sensor but it would've been great for the 12 to be upgraded to 24. So often when not shooting in raw, the 12mpxl looks good.. but punching in at all and you're reminded that this is a digital camera with just 12 megapixels.

Can someone tell me what lens was on the sony?

Great job!

Need to get a7r5… hope u guys can do Jpg vs Jpg… limited storage on my Ip

A lot of these are not because of the actual camera being less sharp but instead the A1 focusing on a different point and because the DoF is so shallow it appears that the image is less sharp as only parts of the image is extremely sharp

Well done team for making this video glad to say Each and every single time I picked the iPhone photo

These results make me want to start taking more pics with my iPhone.😄

I like how close the iPhone is to DSLR. But can you do like multiple phones raw vs DSLR next? Like maybe Sony phone, iPhone, Samsung? Whichever that has raw.

Phone camera is deferent from a pro grade camera, Pro grade camera capture information and can edit more, phone camera include software to correct some pixel.,

Love your comparisons, I left this year out, but I guess next year will be even better 👍😁

These have honestly become my favorite Max Tech videos. Appreciate y’all, here’s to continued success 🍷

I love these blind tests.

Just imagine the level when iphone bringing in the telescopic/perisope camera later on😍

I love what you did here. It's a testament to how advanced our phones are these days. You can argue the point that the pro camera can do this or that all day long, but that's really an academic argument. If people are seeing the images and picking iPhone pictures as being better, that's all that matters. I have a prosumer Canon and a Nikon and the pictures I shoot are only fractionally better than what these little phones are doing except in very specific situations. Thanks for doing the great stuff you do!

iPhone 14 Pro is the first iPhone camera that hasn’t disappointed me. 👍🏻

can be the mic used for canon powershot g7x mark 2

Even though the Sony was better in most cases, the iPhone performed incredibly well. At 17:38 a better photo could have been taken on the Sony by using a slower shutter speed with a tripod.

Yo this comparison is wild!

since the ihpone works in conjunction with Ai, it would only be fair, to edit the mirrorless Pics in Luminar Ai... there you can also brighten up faces etc. just with a slider

Does the iPhone allow the embedding of the Photographers name into metadata like the Sony does?

Looks like you stopped down the Sony camera so it wouldn’t be so sharp. What was F stops set at for photos?

@mrlightwriter

Жыл бұрын

When stopping down a lens (to its ideal point) one increases the sharpness, not the other way around.

Amaazing review

For average user, iPhone is probably a better choice. I can take way nicer (to my taste) portraits with my Fuji X-E3 (not even a pro camera) and F1.2 lens every time I use manual settings, even without RAW post processing as JPEGS from Fujis are great. If I add to it RAW photo + post processing (usually only Lightroom) I can print it in a large format and be very happy with it. I can also take amazing street or landscape photos, but then I need extra lenses with me. They're far superior, but very inconvenient, especially if I compare it with a smartphone. iPhone doesn't come even close if you print anything bigger than 10cm x 15cm. But if you just print small, post photos on the internet, or share with friends, well - there's hardly a better tool at the moment. During my last holidays I was barely using my Fuji. Carrying only an iPhone made me enjoy my time better, and I still took great photos. And that was only iPhone 13 Mini. Now with iPhone 14 Pro it's another step up. I was already considering selling my photography gear, and I totally understand people who simply choose a smartphone over the purposely built camera. What you get for your money now is amazing. So it all depends what you want, how much do you want to pay for it and how much time do you want to spend doing it. For now I keep both just in case...

wich is beter the iphone doing its best or a $9,000 pro camera used at will??

Love the channel and videos but on this one, I believe we need to be careful with drawing a proper conclusion. These kind of tests often seem to suggest that smartphone cameras can fully replace regular cameras. But I (still) see them as rather complementary. Leaving aside zoom capabilities, it might be true that in 90% of all cases smartphone cameras might perform as well as (or even outperform) regular cameras. But the reality for me (as having the privilege of owning both devices) is that I have my Sony for the 10% tail cases where I am on a photowalk and want to take a photo in very challenging (light) conditions, also with a view to do some comprehensive post-shot editing in lightroom. It is clear that my iPhone is sufficient (or even superior when also considering its weight compared to a regular camera) to take a nice spontaneous point and shoot landscape picture when being on the way to work. At the same time, I would certainly not even consider choosing the iPhone over a full frame camera for taking Wild Life shots or photos of the milky way. Maybe we should all take a rest and stop trying to find the ‚one and only‘ camera and instead realize that (for the moment) both categories of cameras have their right to exist in a way that people then can choose the one that best fits their needs (acknowledging that for many people the smartphone might be the more obvious candidate in most situations).

the problem with theseblind camera test is Wadim sometime tries too hard to choose or figure out the iphone shot. Not just this video tho in most of them.

without pixel peeping - majority wont tell a differance, but to a pro it's obvious - i picked 100% of A1, they seem more natural - not over saturaded or over sharp

I’ve seen a lot of cases, both here and elsewhere, where the iPhone photo looks more appealing to my eyes, even though it’s clearly less accurate!

Ccomputational photography is really taking over

"Better" is getting highly subjective here. As a pro photographer/cinematographer, I have to say, sharpness isn't the primary measure of a good photo. Also, I understand you weren't going for the best photos you could take, but the sony will certainly have both a better best and a worse worst example. If you had used "better" lenses, a tripod, etc, then the sony would have done much better for some of these. That being said....I have to say...we have arrived. Computational photography (not video...yet) is in the same weight class as pro cameras in *some* situations. You have made an amazing case for the iPhone and I myself use a 13 pro for 95% of my personal/family photo and video. Keep it up.

I literally only preferred the iPhone twice, I just don’t think ProRAW looks realistic or is worth using over RAW, the over-processing and oversharpening and baked in overdone dynamic range all make it look just like a crappy JPEG… but with some extra editing tools.

17:33 what aperture where you at? Cannot be a comparable one to the iphone.

This is comparing an Ferrari 488 to a Camry into traffic to see what is the better car lol.

Love the video. Why doesn’t Apple make a mirrorless camera that could combine the pros of having big sensors and glass and all of their experience with computational photography? Could such a thing be done and would anyone buy it?

@Mikaisafk

Жыл бұрын

Amazing idea I agree . But why would you ever upgrade your iPhone then. Its bad business unfortunately

@ra3rd99

Жыл бұрын

@@Mikaisafk Mostly pro photographers would buy the iCamera anyway. Everyone else would still buy an iPhone every year like they do now. I personally would buy the iCamera, and have the new iPhone on me at all times. If I could replace my pro camera with a camera that does amazing computational photography on top of having a large sensor, that's just a win win. That's just me though, but I think others pros would feel the same. Another thought: Sony makes the sensors for iPhones, why can't Apple make the chipsets for Sony cameras?

@Lordbyronq

Жыл бұрын

I don’t think the products would have to be mutually exclusive. Instead, Apple could do what they do best and leverage an ecosystem where your iPhone and your iCamera work together. For instance, you could use your iPhone as a remote display for your iCamera, or as a remote flash, or send photos and videos to be edited on an iPad. Just some thoughts, but this is something I really wish Apple would do if they did this would they make it compatible with an existing brand for lenses? Or would they create their own brand or line of lenses?

@walmartpimp2

Жыл бұрын

I would love for an Apple Mirrorless camera that is medium format (beyond full frame), shoots 45 megapixel stills, can record 8K 60FPS 12bit ProRes Raw, has a dual base ISO of 640 and 20,000, has an LPL mount and I would like Apple to commission Leica/Leitz to make some prime lenses and a few zooms.

the fact you can today compare the $9k camera to the phone is just hilarious... Imagine doing that 10 years ago...

Watching on my 4k monitor, I got 28 for A1, 7 for iPhone, and 3 I didn't mind either. The iPhone is very impressive for a tiny camera lens, but I still find so many of the images over sharpened to the extent that they look too fake, my eye's just don't see the real world with such crispiness! I wonder if this is down to post processing, or still baked in to the Apple RAW files. I'm also not convinced by the HDR, yes more of the scene range is visible but again it doesn't look natural, in the real world we'd squint when looking at a dark foreground with a bright back light, which naturally blows out the highlights. To be fair the iPhone HDR does look better on a high dynamic range screen such as the iPhone itself, so may that more an issue of trying to compress the dynamic range for viewing on a non HDR screen.

in a way its a weird compare its complex buildin editor vs slightly edited images. comments like didn't want to use a brush on this that now is single action in lr. also most 14pro are oversharp thats seen as detail. what we can say is iphones and phones in general use a amazing amount of tricks during and after taking the images that has to be matched by long exposures, multiple exposures and a little more editing thats all auto-done on a phone. but this gains you more flexibility

@MaxTechOfficial

Жыл бұрын

It’s always a tough call to know how much editing to do. Some people want me to do none, some want me to use brushes and mask the sky separately, etc. I could even take multiple raw shots on the A1 and combine them first but of course all of that takes way more time and we are comparing to an iPhone which does it automatically. I tried to find a balanced medium between what people ask, and still be able to compare a wide variety of photos where many KZreadrs who do similar content have barely and photos since it takes a lot of time to do something like this compared to a regular youtube video they would make.

@scb2scb2

Жыл бұрын

@@MaxTechOfficial i understand fully and its a good thing that the iphones build in set of tricks and editor are ao tuned that it gives amazing results at the click of a button. but programs like lightroom also evolve the different push and pulls are now also easy done with buttons like select sky or subject in lightroom no need to open photoshop. in many ways we need better 'give me 10 processing options' in programs like lightroom to compete the quick edit and sony needs to build in way more into the 'raw' files including long handheld exposures or multiple focus shots for marco. The whole concept of 'raw' is weird anyway most camera fiddle with the raws so just get over it and store all the bits you want in a 'fat' file for the editing program. thats what is the issue here 'stupid' capturing and 'way to much work editing tools' vs a well integrated plan of capturing all the data needed and complex and amazing at times auto editing.

I love that the kid has the same brown boots I just bought to my kid at Walmart 🎉

Wow. I wish that you also had the 13 Pro Max in this comparison.

next time do it with the new 7r5 or wait for the a1 ver.2

What's the difference between the Lark C1 and Lark M1?

@MaxTechOfficial

Жыл бұрын

Lark C1 comes with either a lighting port for iPhone or usb-c port for android phones. The M1 comes with a 3.5mm headphone jack cable for other computers or cameras.

@chinitopinoy1726

Жыл бұрын

@@MaxTechOfficial let’s say I buy a Lark M1, can I buy an adapter to use on my phone as well? If so, which adapter do I get for IPhone? Thanks!

@hollylandtech

Жыл бұрын

@@chinitopinoy1726 Yes you can! Ideally an Apple-certified lightning to 3.5 adaptor!

@chinitopinoy1726

Жыл бұрын

@@hollylandtech thank you!

can you do one for iPhone 15?

I wish Apple produced a version of iPhone with a big camera.

Also, I feel like you need to be doing this on a larger screen. I kept feeling like you guys were not seeing what I am seeing on a larger 4K monitor.

@walmartpimp2

Жыл бұрын

They should view the photos on a Pro Display XDR. It’s 32” 6K display leaves little to the imagination.

The Raw edits from the A1 are very bad, the A1 has a lot of dynamic range. Also most of the Pictures with the a1 were not exposed correctly

iPhones pro raw is in another level that no other smartphones can compete

In all ways for every instance I was 50/50 and would likely be able to edit either to look a lot like the other. So, bottom line, no point in have the Sony other than for gathering a lot of tele-detail where the Sony would have worked. However, I have a Sony A7RIV and would be fine with that as opposed to purchasing the A1. Actually the A7IV would also be fine. So I would get the iPhone 14 Pro and save $8000.

@kovy689

Жыл бұрын

Just sell it, buy an iPhone and use the extra cash to go on a vacation.

To me A1 looks way more natural to me do you shoot f2.8 on some of those image from A1 looks blurred/bokeh

At 5:55 the iPhone reveals itself through the reflection of the protective glass. This is not fine. But all together is the the iPhone a great substitute for a professional Camera.

Why dont you use low iso?🥺

Anyone experiencing camera focus issues? Mainly at blank objects like the sky, the ground, or a wall?

Photos wise the iPhone 14 models can’t even beat the Pixel phones never mind a full frame beast.

The computational photography is just superior. And the iPhones sensors also got bigger and better every time.

I don’t miss a single one always can easy see which is the pro camera

@markm7411

Жыл бұрын

All images which have blur always some bugs on iPhone, images then from both other lenses except the pro raw always over sharpened

@markm7411

Жыл бұрын

And iPhone also deforms things so much, directly on the first image kid looks like a different kid on the iPhone. Long way to go to compare to pro cameras

Sony could learn a thing or two from Apple. The iPhone 14 Pro is amazing. For the casual user, the iPhone absolutely smokes the Sony. Sure, with a lot of post processing, the Sony is probably a better camera for professionals but the one shot iPhone in a wide variety of lighting conditions is an extremely compelling choice. Considering the price, the iPhone is absolutely, hands down, the winner for the average snapshot taker and you get a phone for the same price. It's also much easier to share photos via the cloud or send pictures directly via SMS or email.

Comparing shots on 14'' screen? Nice. Why not strait from the Insta on a phone?=))

People often confuse sharpness and contrast with detail. Here you hear „*definitely* more detail on the iPhone“ a lot, but when you take a closer look there’s finer detail on the A1 pictures. They are more natural and „organic“ looking as well. The iPhones photos are simply more in your face with their sharpening - and I say all of this as an iPhone user. Also, portrait mode almost always smudges fine detail on the outline of subjects such as hair. Nowhere close to the organic sharpness rolloff of a native wide aperture lens. It’s better than it was on older iPhones, but it’s directly visible and distracting. But well, it does not matter anyway as we all watch photos on really tiny screens 😅

I know it's hard to figure out what's a "good comparison", but I can say that parts of this one were really bad. Massively cropping in vs using a telephoto lens, using insanely high ISOs vs long exposures, and not doing any HDR with the camera is pretty crazy to me if you are going to do all of that with the iPhone. I don't know about the modern phones, but they have some sort of light, so I'd also say not putting a flash on the camera is misleading if the iPhone is firing a light / flash in the night shots.

2:32 I get what they both are saying. That’s a hard one. I would’ve went with left ultimately!

Crazy iPhone ❤

Basically the iPhone is doing the calculations FOR YOU that would optimize every pic. It’s basically giving a novice the skill set of a top pro photographer

The image and processing quality of the iPhone's camera is great, but the thing that still trips me up is the simple fact that a shallow lens ruins the perspective of many of the photos I take. A long lens on a dedicated camera is so much better at capturing things like landscapes. Of course, I've yet to try the iPhone 14 Pro. Perhaps things have improved in recent years...?

I like the colour accuracy from Sony, it is very good.

Good to know I don’t need an expensive camera having an iPhone 14 pro max.

Watching this after my wife, who has an iPhone 14, asked for a $300 camera for Christmas lol