Nice review, Can you please show MIL reticle ?

Nice review, the Magnification rings is absolutely not smooth.. its turns really hard.. as you saying it had a little tunnel effects..look likes the first version was more grate than the new version;)

Which riflescope is optically better? Image sharpness, light transmittance? Which riflescope has better parallax settings? Delta Stryker 4,5-30x56 gen. 3rd or IOR Crusader 5-40x56 gen. 2nd? Thanks

@OpticsTradeEU

2 жыл бұрын

Hello! Could you please write us an email at info@optics-trade.eu? Our sales team will help you as soon as possible.

@choochoo007

2 жыл бұрын

​@@OpticsTradeEU Hello and THX

can you show a view looking through this scope, i have heard it is not as good as the 1st crusader. is this true?

@OvertonWindex

2 жыл бұрын

No. It is not true. Speaking to Val himself... it's exactly the same. That said you will get inpervievable differences in one piece of glass to another. But these are some of the best glass out there. The rumor you're speaking of stems from the tube parallax switching to the side parallax, allegedly adding one more lense. But that is not the case. There is no mechanical possibility for this to be lower glass quality in aggregate.. all gen 2s vs all gen 1s.