That is absolutely breathtaking. I cannot wait for this mission.

Good Luck God Bless

I just listened to the original then the remix and it almost brought tears to my eyes How Beautiful a persons creativity can be.

Nice

Great news! Good luck either your new endeavour.

According to NASA the Lunar South Pole is on the rim of Shackleton Crater q.v. at 5:55.

When is the im2 mission going to happen

No EagleCam?

I am not a rocket scientist. Please explain to me why IM goes for a vertically designed lander as opposed to a more horizontal,lower COG to perhaps improve the odds of a successful landing? Thank you.

@user-McGiver

2 ай бұрын

you need atmosphere for that... it's not ''rocket science''...

@alextroyan6585

2 ай бұрын

Thank you , I think I was 4 when I realized that the taller something got, the easier it was to tip over.

@Cervin_Suisse

2 ай бұрын

need atmosphere to make a lower COG structure ? What did I miss ?@@user-McGiver

@javierderivero9299

2 ай бұрын

@@user-McGiver Apollo had a lower COG...no need of atmosphere ....just gravity...the problem is $$$s and the design of the fuel tanks...these are very low cost landers

@javierderivero9299

2 ай бұрын

I agree...they let AI to be on the pilot seat...AI is still not good to drive cars on earth...not good enough to land on the moon with a low cost design...Apollo had lower COG

When will IM-2 be launched from planet Earth?

How can the really spend time on the moon for more than a few hours?????

Shib sakti

It's a shame IM-1 tipped over while landing causing it's power from the solar panels to die out after 2 days or something

Intuitive machines will get helium 3 at moon. It's congratulations for human energy systems..

NOK lost the rover contract?

why is there so much insistence on this landing system? on mars the airbag system works great. maybe a hybrid system between the two? the low gravity of the moon would help a lot.

@allangibson8494

2 ай бұрын

Aeroshells don’t work on the moon. The moon is also rougher than Mars with steeper gradients.

@markschoenberger7825

2 ай бұрын

Any time you add another system (airbags) you add multiple points of failure. Also the impact with airbags is not as smooth as a rocket landing. No atmosphere means you have to have engine braking anyway, so why not use it for the landing too.

@eugen-m

2 ай бұрын

@@markschoenberger7825 it seems that successful Mars missions are not bothered by this addition😁

@eugen-m

2 ай бұрын

@@allangibson8494 I noticed that most of the failures take place before landing. the probe reaches a stationary position and begins its vertical descent. and the most important is the landing area. with an airbag you shouldn't have to worry anymore. the gravity they put is much lower. you can use the classical solution up to a point, then you use the Martian solution. There it went successfully and no one complained about it.

@allangibson8494

2 ай бұрын

@@eugen-m The Martian rovers using air bags were size limited (and one failed). The later ones all used thrust assisted landings with sky crane systems.

Landing connection to laner should be from top of lander not the bottem. may be twicE as LONG AND MAY BE ANOTHER LEG but lander is to high above legs incase of slight surface and speed on aprouch touch down . +

Yaoki rover will be part of the payload. This is the only bit of real info in this video, tbh. The rest - many generic statements. You can do better.

I hope they will at least consult the local school kids for an upgrade to their micky mouse lego design.

So how did they get man on the moon in the 1960,s lol But now only machines Come on people

@user-McGiver

2 ай бұрын

actually, the Eagle faced a similar problem... but Armstrong took over the controls and corrected it... [yes!... the Eagle was in auto...] Did they teach you that in Moscow?... your comrades still haven't made a landing!...

Will it be another embarrassing failure?

@allangibson8494

2 ай бұрын

Depends on whether they take the cover off the laser rangefinder this time. They also broke one of the landing legs on the vehicle due to too high a lateral velocity.

@emonk042

2 ай бұрын

It wasn't a failure, it was a test flight. They learned what could and would go wrong and how to avoid the same issues next time.

@ashleygomez4057

2 ай бұрын

If you call landing on the moon on its first test run a failure? Hope this next one is extremely embarrassing 😢

@teole6364

2 ай бұрын

Probably you are CCP who is working against America

@user-McGiver

2 ай бұрын

NOPE!... THE RUZZIAN TITLE IN FAILURES IS SEFE...!

Some people will believe anything...

@user-McGiver

2 ай бұрын

YES YOU ARE...!

I still haven't forgiven them for hiding the last landing, after they knew it had a slim chance of landing correctly after they found out they had left the lidar locked. They lost my trust that they will do the same again. The landing was the most disappointing thing I have seen, even compared to India's landing. No video and no telemetry.

@user-McGiver

2 ай бұрын

I'm sure they won't mind....not at all!

Gambling with bankruptcy if they fail again

Same problem? to tall? short stubby legs 5 legs twice out stretch area and long arms alway around extending to aid any off center landing . Moon surface can have many unexpected suprises very thin slim hair like shoot fexable rods may help make sure of a good landing

So how much junk will be polluting the moon by the time we can settle on the moon Just asking

@surf2257

2 ай бұрын

Why does it matters, if we step there, well take care of it, restore or use it!

@user-McGiver

2 ай бұрын

@@surf2257 he most likely's a red, trolling their failures...

🌖 NASA & IM need to form a partnership with Hasbro. Make a "Weeble" lander 🛸. Because: Weebles woble but they won't fall down !! ♟️