Balaji Swamy is definitely a gifted teacher and well informed as well.

Doctorate in Computer Science with total inclination to Traditional Values !!!!!! Pranams Swamy !!!!

ஒவ்வொரு மன்வந்தரத்திலும் ஒவ்வொரு சதுர்யுகத்திலும் தசாவதாரம் நடந்து கொண்டே இருக்கிறது என்பது தான் உண்மை.

நேற்றே பார்த்து விட்டேன்.❤❤

🙏🏻அற்புதம் !

Sriramajayam 🙏🙏 This is an epic episode. Rangarajan swamy adiyen used to think you are a very shrude man but I have eventually realised you are a hero in true sense.

Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha 🙏🏻

🙏🙏🙏

Swamy , pls upload a video about maintaining cows in our grahas . What sashtras says about milking them ? How our purvaas maintained them ?

Pranams swamin......well said🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

Thanks Swami.

Very nice

❤❤🙏🙏

In Mahabharata it is mentioned that if a king ruled in accordance with dharma, one day is equal to year. When valmiki said Rama went to forest for 14 years,not referring to any king rule here so we have to take 14 years literally. 1

🙏🙏🙏🙏

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Please talk about dinosaurs 41:08

Only question that needs to be answered - Swamy is - how to take the 11000 years quoted sloka - as it is a itihaas, a contemporary narrative, so, should we consider that Ramayana was written on the end of 11000 years end ⁉️ as it's written contemporary evidence. If we consider it as a futuristic projection - why can't that be considered as an appreciation / simile / metaphor used in that sloka and why should 11000 years should be taken literally as human years?! And do we have any evidence and scientific research papers published on the Nala / Rama Sethu and the period when it could have been formed?! I wish to make it clear and agree with swamy upfront that those papers can be challenged and countered in future and the dates may go many thousands of years older as we get more evidences, so one paper now may be nullified by another in future. 🙏✌️ Still, what is the max, evidence we have currently, on the lines of confirmation that we currently have on the subject of Nala / Rama Sethu. Do you know any research articles published on the subject?!

@raghunathansrinivasaraghav6455

19 күн бұрын

The entire interview is trash.

Valuable discussion, Glad to see you with rangarajan swamy. Srimathae Ramanujaya nama: 🙏🏻

Mr Balaji, please don't fall in the trap of Rangarajan.

@sridharsubramanian180

18 күн бұрын

Mr.Rangarajan is right in his opinion. Mr.Balaji has a phd (a research based degree). So he knows to analyze things & arrive at conclusions - not like common man who blindly follow / copy someone's foot steps or echo / parrot some one else's opinion.

@abhinavrajan5190

18 күн бұрын

Please see my comment too

There was a comment made in the interview, saying if "वर्ष is to be taken as a day" in the shloka शतवर्षसहस्राणि, then it needs to be takes a day in other shlokas like "ऊनषोडशवर्षो" and other places. I don't think that is correct. Obviously ऊनषोडशवर्षो, a novice reader can understand षोडशवर्षो means 16 years and not 16 days. Vishwamitra would not have asked for child whose age is less than 16 days. If someone says that in शतवर्षसहस्राणि shloka anvaya, whether it should be days or years, we have to find answer from Ramayana itself as much as possible, without relying on any other texts. It is mentioned in the same sarga/shloka, Rama did many 10/100Ashwamedha, many Vajapeya and other yajnas etc. Will it be possible to do all those yajnas in 11,000 days ie 30 years? चित्रा नक्षत्रं भवति, I believe this Chaitra pournia, so 100 Ashwamedha will need 100 years minimum ?:-). Definitely as a कवि valmiki uses exaggeration, it is part of the kaavya shastras, whether exaggeration is there in this particular shloka, it will be great if an answer can be given based on Ramayan itself and not quoting any other texts.

Firstly, my respect to the revered swamy's in the video. Me too, still a learner. In this conversation, I agree with the views presented by Dr. Sri Balaji Swamy. They appear clear and valid to me. Thank you for enlightening me with your views. Nevertheless, I do not understand the intention of this video. Is it to provide clarification on the DoB of Lord Rama, or is it to target a person? I think it is for the latter reason. Yes, respected Dushyanth Sridhar might be wrong on what he has conveyed. But have both Swamy's tried contacting Dushyanth Sridhar and conveyed your displeasure for misinterpreting the actual facts to the public and condemning him directly as this was authored by him? Because Swamy is concerned about the public, it would be best to inform the author and condemn him for sharing such information, right? Educating the general public about this misinformation is fine. But I see a couple of instances where Swamy's take a direct dig at his movie or mocking from 38:00 to 38:50 about the person for apparently staging such a lavish book release function. Are these conversation topics ever so slightly related with the DoB of Lord Rama? This doesn't appear right for me to remain silent while mocking a learned person. Coming from a respected Guru lineage, I am sure that mocking a person (when the person is not in the picture of conversation) or "remaining silent" while this is being done would never be entertained by their respected Gurus or Acharyas. "செய்யா தனசெய்யோம்; தீக்குறளைச் சென்றோதோம்". Instead of having a direct conversation with the concerned person, I see a lot of videos on the KZread channel, "Our Temples Our Pride Our Right", where the swamy speaks with everyone else apart from the concerned person. As of today, approximately, 10+ video's on this topic with everyone else apart from the person concerned. Unbelieveable intentions to seek people's support to start a party against a person, is it?. This clearly conveys the motive for such an act, and the intentions are very visible. The actions speak volumes about the intentions of the Swamy.

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Dushyanth maaritar than, irunthalum perumal kandi avara vitrungo enmo panitu porar.

The Mahabharata quote is not out of context. It's the other main itihaas to be taken as a pramana. Do you mean to say there were no such practice. 5000 years of Mahabharata is acceptable to everyone and the sloka quoted looks out of context. Quote where the Ramayana Vakyam comes and prove that 11000 years is quoted as-is, meaning Ramayan was written after or say on the end of Shri Rama's 11000 years end. Do you want to say something like that?!.I know that then suddenly it will become a future quote by great rishis Valmiki for you. No harm, but the point is, some are appreciating / descriptions / simile / metaphors words that should not be taken literally. Please don't mistake me as a supporter of 7000+ ir 12000+ or 46 million years, i am simply not aware of it but logical reasoning on the interpretation of the shlokas when it can derive so many meanings for so many acharya purushas, why can't it be allowed for a contemporary who is also not actually vouching for it, but thinks it to be very logical reasoning. There is no logical reasoning to counter it and none of the interviews actually speaking about the counters. In this interview a good try is made - obviously the location of the planets can be same for thousands of years, that's good reasoning. But doesn't it conflict with the physical/ pratyaksha pramana of the sand / rock age of the Nala / Rama Sethu - that has 7000 years of sad below and old rocks wooden floating rocks above them?! If you are not convinced on these years, vouched by scientific work, better prove them wrong or atleast quote counter scientific research articles that proves them wrong or shows that the years mentioned in those scientific studies are unreliable. Because none of our previous acharyas had faced such constraints and no such questions where asked and that is correct as it's very insignificant as time is relatively defined and its a quasi cyclic concept of our Sanathan Dharma, it's better to concentrate on productive dharma that Rama wanted us to follow.

In all the summary is that convey the message that you have in puranam. Don’t try to justify few things that you think that others may question you. It’s just an anxiety. If they want let them research. Why are you wasting your energy?

@17:30+ one who rejected pramana that too (shubhda pramana) how come he becomes nastigan?! What's an illogical derivative. How come the questioning / doubting blind beliefs infered and just asking for an alternate inference of the same shudbha pramana will make that person a - nastigan ⁉️ it's a clear indication of failure in the argument. Such personal unnecessary attack is just an indication of Kali Purusha impact for sure and nothing else, on Bharat, is what i would say 😢⁉️

நீங்கள் ஸ்ரீமதே ராமானுஜாய நமஹ கூற வேண்டியதே இல்லை, எளிய மக்களுக்கு பகவானை கொண்டு சேர்த்தாலே போதும், நீங்கள் ஞானம் உள்ளவராக இருப்பதில் அர்த்தமில்லை, எளிய மக்களுக்கு பயன்படாத வரையில்

5.00. The beginning itself is questionable. There is a difference between what is called அரங்கேற்றம் and வெளியீடு. Dushyant has only released a book written by him. This is not அரங்கேற்றம் to get the nod of any commitee or group of scholars. அந்த கால வழக்கப்படி திருவள்ளுவர் எழுதிய திருக்குறளை பலர் அங்கீகரித்த போதிலும் சிலர் அதை பொற்றாமரை குளத்தில் உள்ள சங்கப் பலகை ஏற்றுக் கொள்ள வேண்டும் என்றனர். திருக்குறள் அரங்கேற்றப் பட்டதா அங்கீகரிக்கப் பட்டதா ? கம்ப ராமாயணம் இயற்றப் பட்டபோது தில்லை அந்தணர் மூவாயிரம் பேர்கள் முன்னிலையில் ஶ்ரீரங்கத்தில் வெளி இட்டார். ஏனெனில் அது மூல நூலை ஒட்டி தழுவி எழுதப் பட்டது. அதில் ஒரு பகுதி வந்தபோது அறிஞர்கள் மறுப்பு தெரிவித்தனர். பட்டாபிஷேகத்தில் அவருடைய நண்பர் சடையப்ப வள்ளல் பெயரை குறிப்பிட்டு இருந்தார். அதை முறைப் படுத்தினார் கம்பர். கம்பர் செய்தது சரியா தவறா? இதற்கு இப்போது கருத்து கூறும் உபன்யாசகர்கள் கம்பர் தவறு என்று கூறுவார்களா? அவர்கள் உரையில் கம்ப ராமாயண பாடல்களை கூறாமல் விடுவார்களா? ராஜரிஷி, நவீன சாணக்யர் என்று அழைக்கப் படும் ராஜாஜி வாலி வதத்தில் ராமன் செய்தது குற்றம் என்று எழுதியுள்ளார். அந்தக் காலத்தில் இருந்த மஹா வித்வான்கள் யாரும் ராஜாஜி மேல் பாயவில்லை. அவரவர்களுக்கு தோன்றிய சமாதானத்தை சொன்னார்கள். யாரும் ராஜாஜியை குலத் துரோகி என்று சொல்ல வில்லை. சொல்லப் போனால் அவருடைய ராமாயண கதை - சக்ரவர்த்தி திருமகன் இல்லாத வீடே அப்போது கிடையாது. ஒரு மஹா வித்வான் ரொம்ப அழகாக சமாதானம் சொன்னார். சந்திரனில் இருக்கும் கருப்பு புள்ளிகள் அந்த சந்திரனுக்கு அழகு சேர்க்கிறது என்றார். சசினி களங்கமிவ. ஆகவே துஷ்யந்த் புத்தகம் வெளி இட்டதில் தவறு இல்லை. அதில் ராமன் தசரத குமாரன், சீதா மணாளன், ராவணனை தோற்கடித்து வென்றவன் என்று குறிப்பிட்டு இருக்கிறாரா அல்லது ஸ்வயம்வரத்தில் இராவணன் சீதையை மணந்தான். ராமன் பொறாமையால் சீதையை கவர்ந்து சென்றான். இராவணன் போரிட்டு ராமனை வென்று சீதையை மீட்டான் என்றா எழுதி இருக்கிறார். நம் தர்மத்தை கேவலமாக பேசிவரும் பிரபலமானவர்கள் மீது பொங்காத , பாயாத இம்மாதிரி மக்கள் ஏன் இதற்கு ஆவேசப் படுகிறார்கள். தேவை இல்லாமல் உங்களையும் இறக்கி விடுகிறார். நீங்களே ஏன் துஷ்யந்திடம் விசாரிக்கக்கூடாது. இவருடைய leading questions பதில் சொல்ல வேண்டும்.

@SasidharanBalakrishnan-s6l

15 күн бұрын

இவருக்கு நீங்கள் நிச்சயம் பதில் சொல்ல வேண்டும்

Wellsaid Balaji swamin🙏🙏 Absolutely reasonable and acceptable interpretation presented by sri Balaji swamy in detail and Rangarajan swami in brief about the false statistics presented by the so called "deemed vedic scholar" dushyanth ji.😅😅 Thro their own research arena. Normally his upanyasam will be very interesting but i don't know how he has fallen in the pit of the fasle reaearch oriented arena 😂😂. All should think of it and it s highly questionable also How clearly and frankly explained by Sri Balaji and rangarajan swamin who are also computer engineers only. What i say is that computer is nothing but a replica of human beings brain only otherwise in a slang way v can say that it s an old wine in a new bottle.😅😅😅 So v need not rely on the computer( for this purpose )(which is a junior baby )for all the divine things as the very discovery of the computers is later than old sages' discovery. To be noted. In a nutshell instead of wasting our precious life time to research v can better follow our sanatana ancestors' embedded principles rather. This is my humble opinion In other words as krishna righly pointing out in Mahabharata "சிந்தித்து செயல் படுங்கள்" . இறைவன் அளித்த மகத்தான வரப்பிரசாதமான அறிவை எங்கும் அடகு வைத்து விடாதீர்கள்🙏🙏 ராமன் எப்போது பிறந்தாலும் ராமன் ராமன் தான். அவனே கிருஷ்ணாவும் தான், அவன் அனைத்தும் அறிந்த இறைவன் தான் என்று அவனை சரணடைவது தான் புத்திசாலித்தனம்😅😅😅 ஜெய் ஶ்ரீ ராம் ஜெய் ஶ்ரீ கிருஷ்ணா 🙏

ஜனவரி மாதம் 9ம் தேதி மார்கழி மாதம் தான் வரும். மார்கழி மாதம் பிறந்த ஒரு ஜாதகருக்கு ஸூரியன் எப்படி மேஷ ராசியில் உச்சமாக இருக்கும் ? தனுர் மாதம் என்னும் மார்கழியில் ஸூரியன் தனுசு ராசியில் தானே இருக்க வேண்டும் ?

6.29. துஷ்யந்த் அவர்கள் அவருடைய புத்தகத்தைப் பற்றி ஆச்சார்ய புருஷர்கள் மற்றும் சம்பிரதாய மக்கள் இடம் பேசினாரா இல்லையா என்று உங்களுக்கு தெரியுமா? நீங்கள் துஷ்யந்த் அவர்களிடம் கேட்டீர்களா? ஒருதலை பட்சமாக பேசுவது சரியா. If you are a fair man, you should have told Rangarajan, " Sir, i will talk with Dushyant get his side and then I will answer your questions." If you had done that I salute you, your words carry weight. Confirm.

Nice video . but very egoistic person anyway good

ஸ்வாமி பாலஜிக்கும் ரங்கராஜனுக்கும் ஒரு கேள்வி. லக்னம், நக்ஷத்திரம், திதி, கிரஹ நிலைகள் பற்றி விரிவாக எழுதி இருக்கும் வால்மீகி எந்த வருஷம் ( பஞ்சாங்க ) என்று ஏன் குறிப்பிட.வில்லை.

10.20 Mr Balaji you are wrong and biased and carried away by the insinuation of Rangarajan. .No where either in News Channel or in You Tube Channel, Dushyant claimed that he is a vedic scholar. He was introduced by the anchors and many a time, Dushyant had requested to spare him of that introduction. Let us assume that he is not a vedic scholar. Whom do you call one person as vedic scholar. What is the definition of SCHOLAR.? WILL YOU CALL A PERSON AS A VEDIC SCHOLAR, IF HE UNDERWENT TRAINING IN LEARNING VEDAS, AS TEXT FOR CONSIDERABLE PERIOD AND DOING PARASYANAM OR A PERSON WHO NOT ONLY UNDER GOES TEXT LEARNING BUT ALSO THE BASHYAM. ASSUMING THAT I KNOW THE THREE MAHA VAKYAMS OF BRAHMA SUTRAM WILL I BE CALLED BRAHMA SHRI OR IF I UNDERGO RIGOROUS INTERNSHIP IN KNOWING, AASIMILIATING THE BASHYAMS OF ACHARYAS. YOU ARE FIT TO BE CALLED A BASHYA ADHIKARI ONLY AFTER THAT.TILL SUCH TIME YOU SHOULD NOT SPEAK EXCEPT IN SADAS WHEN YOU CAN SEEK CLARIFICATIONS.

@28:35+ it felt very sad to see such comments, that too on a genuine film acted by Shri Dushyant Sridhar Ji, targeted at common man who would like to see their heros dressed decently. With respects to this yong Shri Dr. Balaji Swamy - i wish to point out the logical flaw in his own reasoning. Why should a great acharya like Shree Vedantha Desika Swamy be shown as any common poverty stricken street beggar of current days? Does Dr. Balaji Swamy understand what he is meaning to say ?! It's called CONFIRMATION BIAS. I will give a logical reasoning - Obviously Shree Vedantha Desikan Swamy got a good dress vesti agangavastram as a dhanam dakshina from one of his shishya. If i tell like this, do you have a logical counter to my claim?! Golden earrings is a indication of following sampradaya having shanka and chakra, may be the golden anklets (may be just a way of creative freedom that is in no way harming the story shown in the film). Do you have any reasons to prove it otherwise, countering these points?! Bhiksha by a Brahmin is a dharma and Swamy was following that Dharma, he was not begging like Street beggars that you wanted to compare with. (For that matter, there where historical references that say, before few centuries back, there where no beggars found in streets of Bharat). It's definitely a unnecessary quote here, irrelevant for the discussion, on the topic of Rama and his time period.

@SmritiTheVedicLifestyle

20 күн бұрын

Ready to answer in WhatsApp.! It’s really difficult for me to type n no of paragraphs

@AnandRajappan

20 күн бұрын

Thank you Shri Balaji Swamy for your kind response. Adiyen Dasaanudaasan 🙏✌️

@DivineLearnings

19 күн бұрын

It's clear that you didn't read the life of Sri Vedanta Desika. If you read, then you can understand what Sri Balaji Swami said was 1000% true. You can't distort the life history of Acharyas for your convenience.

எனக்கு ஒரு சந்தேகம். சூரிய உதயம் and சூரிய அஸ்தமனம் என்று சொல்கிறீர்கள். சூரியன் is a fixed star. It does not revolve or move, then where is the question of rising and setting.

@yaathumanavan7098

19 күн бұрын

உதயம் என்றால் ஆரம்பநிலை தோற்றம் என்று பொருள் அஸ்தமனம் என்றால் மறைதல் என்று பொருள். தமிழில் சொன்னல் விடியல், பொழுது புலர்தல் என்று கூறலாம் சூரியன் மறைதலை பொழுது சாய்தல் என்று கூறுவார்கள் அதற்காக நேராக நின்ற சூரியனை எப்படி சாய்க்க முடியும் என்று கூறமுடியும். சூரியன் அன்றைய நாளில் முதன் முதலாக கண்ணுக்கு தெரியும் நேரத்தை வேறு என்னவென்று கூறுவீர்கள்?

It is unfortunate colonial mindset to align with the some western interpretation of archeological and genetic findings get some western blessing.