I have no doubt it took a great deal of effort, contemplation, and precision to create this work. Skillfully performed. And yet, I'm not moved. It begins, it happens, it ends. A sonic and rhythmic journey without movement; sameness, with momentary spasms of more intense sameness. A fascination with precision that eliminates organization.
@guillee68
Жыл бұрын
i appreciate your comment and completely understand it. concerning my interpretation, it is very difficult to apply that concept of romantic expression (to move someone as you say) to such a specific and concrete piece of abstract art. in the end, this is just sounds organized in a way that is not following the classic conception of tonal music, the one we have rooted inside us. i have to say that to me, after years of listening and playing this kind of music, it doesn't make me feel "moved" either, but i enjoy it anyway: i just try to transport myself to a state of imagination and awareness, where every new sound brings a new colour to the landscape i am creating in my mind. also, it changes dramatically to just listen this piece in opposition to watch it being performed live. visuals add a new dimension to the work and gives much more expression, because movement is what gives life to every different sound, so you can see and understand how everything is being "generated". i did not put the video of my playing because this was intended as a score follower while you listen to it. maybe in the future i will record the piece again and upload it with both sound and video. thanks a lot for the comment again. greetings. G
@juliusseizure591
Жыл бұрын
@@guillee68 It's interesting, though, that Lachenmann still holds on to expressive indications like "molto agitato" or "calmo." What do you make of that?
@guillee68
Жыл бұрын
@@juliusseizure591 I play following every Lachenmann indication, but those are for the musical speech, not to tell you which emotions to feel.
@jimit.4220
Жыл бұрын
Simply because you're not moved by Lachenmann's music does not mean others aren't
@roses2155
Жыл бұрын
@@guillee68 I appreciate your thoughtful response to my criticism. You make many good points, though, in the end, the value of art is found in its ability to connect to its audience. No doubt, as noted by others in this thread, it does have meaning to a few people; very few. (That it does, would make for an interesting survey of "why?"). That said, the energy and talents seem wasted in a generally futile effort to connect to an engaged audience. As much as there's a demand that the audience open up to the art, the artist has to reach out to speak to the audience in a way that engages them. This work falls far short of speaking intelligibly to a vast majority of the most ardent and avant garde art lovers. The technical precision and adherence to the score is admirable. Yet, the score is and exercise in penmanship, rather than an artful bridge between artists and audience.
@linuslauterbach29752 жыл бұрын
Who is the performer?
@guillee68
2 жыл бұрын
guillem serrano
@linuslauterbach2975
2 жыл бұрын
@@guillee68 Oh I'm sorry haha! Great playing!
@JohnBorstlap Жыл бұрын
Who takes this nonsense seriously? A clever player can produce the same results while simply improvising, without any score. As a 'piece', it is fake.
@henriquematias1986
11 ай бұрын
your comment as a comment is fake
@artofmusic303Ай бұрын
A kaleidoscope of timbres, nothing more. Largely formless. Interesting for one minute, not 15.
Пікірлер: 32
so good...
love it!!
Incredible and beautiful piece!
increíble ejecución de una obra increíble! wow! bravo!!!
خیلی باحال بود، COOOOOOL
Wow
quite good ...
I’d like very much to see you interpreting Berio’s Naturale very good work here without any doubt it is a full sonorous experience that chills us out
Brilliant Performance! Where did you record it? It sounds incredible
Bravissimo
Increíble pieza. Donde la puedo conseguir?¿
@guillee68
Жыл бұрын
www.percussion-brandt.de/epages/228483.sf/en_GB/?ObjectID=5131063
Learn this score. You have 24 hours.
I have no doubt it took a great deal of effort, contemplation, and precision to create this work. Skillfully performed. And yet, I'm not moved. It begins, it happens, it ends. A sonic and rhythmic journey without movement; sameness, with momentary spasms of more intense sameness. A fascination with precision that eliminates organization.
@guillee68
Жыл бұрын
i appreciate your comment and completely understand it. concerning my interpretation, it is very difficult to apply that concept of romantic expression (to move someone as you say) to such a specific and concrete piece of abstract art. in the end, this is just sounds organized in a way that is not following the classic conception of tonal music, the one we have rooted inside us. i have to say that to me, after years of listening and playing this kind of music, it doesn't make me feel "moved" either, but i enjoy it anyway: i just try to transport myself to a state of imagination and awareness, where every new sound brings a new colour to the landscape i am creating in my mind. also, it changes dramatically to just listen this piece in opposition to watch it being performed live. visuals add a new dimension to the work and gives much more expression, because movement is what gives life to every different sound, so you can see and understand how everything is being "generated". i did not put the video of my playing because this was intended as a score follower while you listen to it. maybe in the future i will record the piece again and upload it with both sound and video. thanks a lot for the comment again. greetings. G
@juliusseizure591
Жыл бұрын
@@guillee68 It's interesting, though, that Lachenmann still holds on to expressive indications like "molto agitato" or "calmo." What do you make of that?
@guillee68
Жыл бұрын
@@juliusseizure591 I play following every Lachenmann indication, but those are for the musical speech, not to tell you which emotions to feel.
@jimit.4220
Жыл бұрын
Simply because you're not moved by Lachenmann's music does not mean others aren't
@roses2155
Жыл бұрын
@@guillee68 I appreciate your thoughtful response to my criticism. You make many good points, though, in the end, the value of art is found in its ability to connect to its audience. No doubt, as noted by others in this thread, it does have meaning to a few people; very few. (That it does, would make for an interesting survey of "why?"). That said, the energy and talents seem wasted in a generally futile effort to connect to an engaged audience. As much as there's a demand that the audience open up to the art, the artist has to reach out to speak to the audience in a way that engages them. This work falls far short of speaking intelligibly to a vast majority of the most ardent and avant garde art lovers. The technical precision and adherence to the score is admirable. Yet, the score is and exercise in penmanship, rather than an artful bridge between artists and audience.
Who is the performer?
@guillee68
2 жыл бұрын
guillem serrano
@linuslauterbach2975
2 жыл бұрын
@@guillee68 Oh I'm sorry haha! Great playing!
Who takes this nonsense seriously? A clever player can produce the same results while simply improvising, without any score. As a 'piece', it is fake.
@henriquematias1986
11 ай бұрын
your comment as a comment is fake
A kaleidoscope of timbres, nothing more. Largely formless. Interesting for one minute, not 15.
Très mal vieilli.