what! i actually didnt see the bear and i was expecting it

so unexpected that this piece of inattentional blindness that my psych prof used in class is actually an ad 😂

What kind of moonwalk was that?

@chrischangmusic

5 жыл бұрын

lol what kind of bear what that

@joshuahargis3387

5 жыл бұрын

The British kind?

@opt1ss

Жыл бұрын

@@joshuahargis3387the British tip-toe slide

@BackslideDan

Жыл бұрын

Yeah he was trying to moonwalk in metric, and only Americans have been to the moon, so all the derivatives are in imperial measurements

I got the counting *right* and *saw* the bear as well. But I never notice he was doing the moonwalk Well played

@phoenix-lumin8810

4 жыл бұрын

Tam Tran Ngoc same

@angelamagnus6615

4 жыл бұрын

Define see the bear. You mean you actually saw the furry outline of it, or just a blurry black figure passing by.

@jonathandpg6115

3 жыл бұрын

@@angelamagnus6615 See the furry outline for me. It sadly didn't work he was super distracting so I noticed him and was like ahh he must be distracting me from counting....then it turned out I wasn't supposed to see him

i'm pretty sure that was manbearpig

I have been reading about inattentional blindess for a couple years now and had seen several other video tests like this, BUT I MISSED THE BEAR!

@szhzs6121

7 жыл бұрын

you're an idiot

@TheMarshallMalone

7 жыл бұрын

dummdumm muddmudd You cool as fuck

This video does it so much better than the other one. Its so much flashier.

@doornumb

9 ай бұрын

They have actual basketball players

I was counting while paying attion to the bear 😂

Psych 104 brought me here 🤦🏻‍♀️

@elementsofentertainment5493

3 жыл бұрын

PSY-108 brought me here... keep it going

@justicemakaratad1636

3 жыл бұрын

Psych 100 brought me here lol

@chloemarielara4167

3 жыл бұрын

PSY 111 brought me here

@ltm3368

3 жыл бұрын

For me PSY-108!

@haykojan6590

3 жыл бұрын

And this video brought you to me 😻 Lmao jp

Bears walking around crowded streets are part and parcel of living in a global city.

@jp9707

2 жыл бұрын

Especially in the gay quarter

It just means the human brain can't concentrate at more than one thing at a time. It can switch back and forth fast, but not more than one thing at the same time. You also lose track of time, which can be distance over time. Remember that when driving 60mph and texting. You are not doing both at the same time.

i am doing this type of experiment for my science fair project. Am i allowed to download your video and cut of part of it?

I did not actually see the bear! Even though I was aware of its arrival and did count correctly.

This is crazy!

Can my daughter use this for an example in her science project? Brilliant video!

The bear is partly camouflaged because he’s dressed in all black though. If he were in a bright color or possibly even in white, he would’ve been more noticeable.

@galvatrixv

3 жыл бұрын

That is the point though. In real life, not everything is going to stand out and most things just blend into the background.

@jonathandpg6115

3 жыл бұрын

That was the point. We notice colour much more quicker but the bear is quite obvious still and yet apparently people miss him

@lrhudy93

8 ай бұрын

Bears on land are much more often black than a bright color. They're supposed to camouflage within their environment. They're just not supposed to moonwalk.

May I have permission to show this video in public place of worship? Thanks

can i use this for my thesis? please

i saw a bear but idk about moonwalking

I'd like to post this classic to Facebook, but when I do it gives the game away by putting "Did you see the moonwalking bear?" in the screencap.

I missed the bear, but I 100% would see that person on a bike 🚴

sure! :)

I only noticed the bear right before he left. I didn't seen him at all until before he left

I immediately noticed the bear!

clicked a link to this video from a different video for ap psychology, knew it included a bear, still didn't notice the bear smh

i laughed my guts out

I already saw i video like this so I was waiting for something odd.

This is no Moonwalk!

A bear ! I thought that was death moonwalking 😂

came here after i failed to notice that someone (irl) went bald

Got lost on counting the passes.. and did not see the bear.. Im terrible at this ;_; A snake would've been bitten me off XD

if you found a real bear instead of that man, i'm sure it would moonwalk better

I’m weak

this is scary

I liked Clarkson's PSA better: Work harder, get a car.

welcome TBFP fans

@CrittersJitters

8 жыл бұрын

I saw that fucker dancing but then again like most huge cowardly babies I do the opposite of what I'm told.

@1finallygotunleashed

8 жыл бұрын

***** He was...

@ScrubTheNub

8 жыл бұрын

1finallygotunleashed nope, this video was similar to the one he was talking about dummy. Lookup "inattentional blindness" and you'll see the video he was talking about.

@rhezaariyanto32415

8 жыл бұрын

/watch?v=f94o3B3csYI

Jesus

Omg yes I passed first time

I got the right answer and saw the bear. .-.

Omg I did not see the bear lol

13

University of Auckland Psych be like

lol the bear is so funny, guess its only because he wears custom so dark and hard to notice, try a light pink custom next time

I thought i saw something.

I saw the fucking bear lol

@lhistorienchipoteur9968

8 жыл бұрын

you don't have make attention to the pass from the whit team

@szhzs6121

7 жыл бұрын

why you make say he pass the wheat team mate HE DO NOT PASS!!

Jordan Peterson brought me here

Moonwalk needs work

I mean I saw the bear but I thought it was someone on team black

🧍‍♀️man

i did not even see the bear what

我能说我数的时候看见了吗？但我布吉岛原来那是熊。。

Who came here after redrum

we, geniusideas.com.ua believe the one you called a moonwalking bear should rather be considered as a goalkeeper of another team:-)

Was immediately distracted by the bear. It's impossible for me to imagine not seeing that. My mind would pick up on a fun/creative thing more easily than I could even force myself to count the passes (which I was off by 2 during the bear's entrance). I have history of ADD and high rating of Openness to Experience (for reference if you are also here for research) so this makes sense.

@birdie189

3 жыл бұрын

(Had no previous knowledge of the experiment's contents fwiw. Did expect distraction but much more subtle)

Lmfao I love it

I guess this is supposed to show how people who witness a crime can get it wrong. As if the people in white were committing a crime. But if they were, you WOULD have an accurate assessment of their actions because your attention WAS focused on the people committing the crime. All this really shows is that there might have been ANOTHER crime being committed by the people in black that you didn't notice. Because you were distracted by the actions of the people who committed the FIRST crime. It doesn't mean you got the first crime wrong. You just didn't notice the second crime.

Horribly structured test. This was obviously set up in a very purposeful manner to ensure the viewers eyes don't even come close to seeing the bear. Plus, by having the bear match the color of the other teams outfits, which is in stark contrast to the team color focused on, it's guaranteed people will miss the bear. I knew there was a moon-walking bear before I watched it and even then I wasn't able to spot it. People can literally only consciously focus on one single thing at a time. That's it. So basically a term and test was created to point out the obvious. Gratz!

@catrescue6413

2 жыл бұрын

That is the whole point. When you watch it first time if you are counting the passes you would miss it. But when you watch it second time by paying attention to catching the bear you see the bear. I use this video in my class to teach my students we only pay attention to the things we care about and we can miss the things our culture do not teach us as being important. We see the things as we are not as they really are.

@robertcastleberry2909

2 жыл бұрын

​@@catrescue6413 Not an accurate reflection of the test. As I pointed out, if the instruction was to count how many times the team members in black passed the ball then the viewer would most often notice the moonwalking bear. This is because our focal point is transitioning between black and the ball. Even though we are not instructed to look for a bear we would still notice it as the color black is one of our focal points. If instead someone dressed like a polar bear and crossed the scene we would have noticed it while counting passes made by those in white. We see what we are focused on. That's the simple of it all. A fact that magicians have been using to their benefit for long before this study came to exist. The same observation that we miss what we aren't focused on could have been made by completing forgoing any ape costumed dancers and just asking if the viewer noticed how many times the team in black passed the ball. In fact, if the team in black never even passed the ball at all and just moved around miming the movements of passing a ball the viewer would likely be none the wiser. We cannot look at a page of text and read it all at once. Our focal point has to shift from letter to letter/word to word. If we are instructed to only read every other paragraph on a page we could entirely miss the fact that the paragraphs we skipped over were written in another language. The authors of this study and subsequent book are flawed in their conclusion that the gorilla is LITERALLY invisible to the viewer, a fault that they use to conclude that accidents with motorcycles happen more often because they are LITERALLY invisible to drivers perceptions. Someone performing the same drive everyday will often find themselves driving in a sort of "autopilot". They'll get from point A to point B with little to no recollection of what occurred on the drive, however, the fact that the drive occurred safely meant that they were in fact aware of their surroundings. They could drive behind a red truck the whole way and have zero recollection of there being a red truck on the road with them. If that red truck were in fact invisible, as the authors claim, then the driver would have crashed into it at some point. The "invisible" gorilla test is just another example of an insanely long list of examples that we've had for a very long time that we are incapable of focusing on all things at once. The test itself presents nothing new. The authors interpretations of it however, present a lot of inaccurate assessments of what the test does present. Yet one more flawed translation in a very long list of them throughout our history of observations. You may as well just invite a magician into your classroom to prove the same point.

@CaliJose209

Жыл бұрын

@@robertcastleberry2909 no one's reading that you idiot. That's the point of the experiment not test. Video already fucks up telling you about the bear in the thumbnail. Whole point is to show how easily we miss things when distracted.

@zeta265

Жыл бұрын

yes i agree, it was horrible but still creates awareness for other people. that's the point of the video

@zeta265

Жыл бұрын

rather do such test in real life than watching it in a video like driving while texting. to see if i'd miss something crucial lol

cant see shit captain, 360=

What kind of moonwalk was that?