You need to mention that this is a Mac only system. No Android version as of today. So that will bring the cost way up to the Android community. Thanks for all your videos! You Rock!

I just started using this system for myself a week before you uploaded this video. Such a great system

This is a great PSA for bands out there on a budget (which is 99% of us I would guess lol). Thanks for pointing me toward my next fun weekend project!

Would be interesting to see a latency measurement comparison vs a more classic IEM system with console and sennheiser bodypacks

@callumsantino8435

2 жыл бұрын

InstaBlaster.

This is what I’ve been waiting for. Thanks for this video. This has helped so much dude

I build computer networks for a living. The no latency claim makes me really nervous.

@ayeapprove

4 жыл бұрын

And I hope they're using 5GHz or else this thing will fail at even smaller venues.

@andivax

4 жыл бұрын

ayeapprove did you mean 2.4 GHz?

@ayeapprove

4 жыл бұрын

@@andivax 2.4GHz has more devices interfering

@andivax

4 жыл бұрын

ayeapprove didn't know. 5 GHz has less range, right?

@ayeapprove

4 жыл бұрын

@@andivax yes, but is more stable in that regard

This was fantastic. Thank you for bringing this to my knowledge, and thank you for all your great videos and music!

Very cool, I'll be keeping on eye on this product. Been looking for a way to setup iem without breaking the bank. Thanks Fluff!

On the Google transcription, that was on by mistake, it said "Welcome to Wrists Spirits and Gear." I had to mention it as it really cracked me up. Love your videos and especially your incredible mixes.

StageWave has a very similar product that has on board compressors & EQ for each channel, basically eliminating the need to double channels for an IEM mix or have a 2nd board to get a solid IEM mix.

Definitely awesome idea/product. Would love to see digital mixer manufacturers integrate this into their units. Already using the wifi to control mixes. Also, i prefer proprietary body packs but a decent mobile device is still cheaper than a decent transmitter/receiver unit.

@ayeapprove

4 жыл бұрын

I wouldn't trust WiFi on stage with anything more than controlling your IEM mix like the Behringer does.

Last time I checked, this was only for iPhone. I don't know if they ever planned on making an Android version. I like the idea, but I'm not gonna buy into apple.

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

We are in development on the Android version of Performer but you still need a Mac to run SoundCaster so someone in the band has to buy into Apple

@aaronmp1705

4 жыл бұрын

@@AudioFusionSystems Is there any possibility of there being a PC version?

@psymon1981

4 жыл бұрын

In fairness the site says you can use a mid 2010 macbook pro and a 6th gen ipod touch. you can get both of those for less than £200 on ebay. If it's going to be part of your live rig you'd want it to be something you don't mind getting battered so this is still super cheap compared to other set ups

@JoshRiffMonster

4 жыл бұрын

@@AudioFusionSystems hopefully you can make a version for windows and Android, which are vastly used as well

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Jason Constantine be sure to subscribe to our email list so we can keep you updated when they come out! audiofusionsystems.com/contact-us/

KZread undertitles be like: "today on wrist spirits and gear"

Great video, thanks! (I have the same sound traps and lighting as you in my studio BTW... awesome....)

I know I've never asked for you to cover this but I've been wanting for you to do a review on this.

That's absolutely genius and how the hell hasn't this been thought of before? Really surprisingly simple idea in principle

@MisterRorschach90

4 жыл бұрын

First commenter took the answer right off my fingers. Wireless technology have only just recently caught up enough to allow decent quality. Even then, if you want quality that matches high end wired solutions you are going to be paying quite a bit for it.

@carwynvan

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah but how often do you see these kind of things crop up and just be really naff until a bigger name comes along and does it right?

@compucat

4 жыл бұрын

​@@carwynvan Live audio engineer here. There is zero way I'd trust this system on a stage with a house full of people: neither computers nor Wi-Fi are "trustworthy" on stage. Sure, they're decently reliable, but they're not mission-critical reliable. I'm okay with a MacBook or Mac Mini being used in a non-critical role (say, Ableton or MainStage), especially with a redundant backup. No worries there. For something as critical as *monitors,* though (arguably more important than FoH sound)? No way. Wi-Fi runs on the freely available 2.4 and 5 GHz spectrum and is usually paired with a packetized network over top of it. This has a few key issues: this spectrum is being shared by a ridiculous number of devices (especially...the audience's phones), for one, and packet latency is non-deterministic. Put simply, you don't know how long it takes for a packet to get from transmitter to receiver. This is fine on a reliable hardwired network with enterprise routing equipment (that's how Dante/AES67 works), but a wireless connection is ridiculously unpredictable...which means larger receive buffers...which means latency. The fact that AudioFusion specifies the nominal latency as "not perceivable" and not as a hard number is a ridiculous red flag. And that's assuming that you're the only device in the spectrum of interest...oh wait, nope! Every single band member is on the same AP, which can only transmit on 1 channel per band (let's ignore MIMO for brevity). That same channel could be in use by who knows how many other devices, which is a perfect recipe for packet loss...and very mad musicians when they can't hear themselves. Suffice it to say, there's an incredibly good reason why Shure and Sennheiser still use "oldschool" UHF analog FM wireless for their IEM systems: it's rock solid reliable when set up right, fails gracefully, and is a legitimately zero-latency system. Lectrosonics does make a digital IEM system, but I've never used it myself - it's also not nearly as popular.

Please do a follow up with with X32. Would like to know how to make it work with a mixer. And how it works while there's interference. Basically, a stress test of the system.

Hey Fluff! Did you have to use something like loopback to make this properly work?

great stuff man, thanks for sharing ! Peace

If it shows up for Android my band mates will probably be way more into the idea, but unfortunately I’m the only member in my band with an iPhone. Regardless of what phone situation my band is in, this is totally cool and I’m interested for sure for looking to the future for IEM systems.

I remember seeing Churchfront do a video on this.

Very cool

I used a similar technology for getting my mix to my car. It works great with latency expected. In a live performance with FOH hmm. Something tells me latency could be an issue.

This looks amazing. I have several interfaces and laptops I’m not currently using much. System requirements would perhaps need to be addressed, but my current iPhone is good to go. Thanks for this vid Fluff. You rock bro.🤟🏻

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Jason Heaton your Mac just needs to be able to run MacOS 10.12 or newer. audiofusionsystems.com/support/choosing-the-right-gear/

@bergglobus2428

4 жыл бұрын

@@AudioFusionSystems hey, any chance u bring out a windows version?

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Berg Globus we are in development on the Android version of Performer. The Windows version of SoundCaster will have to follow that.

@bergglobus2428

4 жыл бұрын

@@AudioFusionSystems good luck

Not a fan of using a cellphone on stage. But the routing sytem is innovative !

How were you able to send the tracks straight from logic into soundcaster and control them seperately? I only see my audio interface as an input option therefore i cannot control each track independently once the signal arrives to soundcaster

What about for shows? What WiFi do you use? Could you use the behringer x32 and connect a router to it?

@RiffsAndBeards

4 жыл бұрын

Yep!

how did you get audio signal from Logic to Soundcaster?

When it says performers, is that phones or tracks?

Dude I just quit my first band with a iem setup lmao now I can jam at home like a pro 😂😂😂😂 gonna start a new band! Edit gonna need an iphone and a mac first RIP to my dreams 😂😂😂

Not including the fact you've already invested thousands in your current IEM setup, would you ever switch to this for Dragged Under?

@RiffsAndBeards

4 жыл бұрын

Possibly for out of country shows yes, as there are very strict laws about using anything wireless.

We have digital mixer. We have iphone. But no Mac. Only Windows PC. So how to get it to work? Thanks.

If you want to use this with an Behringer mixer, het the XR18, because it has an audio interface built in

@ayeapprove

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, 6 mono aux or 3 stereo aux for IEM would be available

@bergglobus2428

3 жыл бұрын

@@ayeapprove yeah with a normal setup but with these you don't need an aux output

@ayeapprove

3 жыл бұрын

@@bergglobus2428 but why would I buy a xr18 if you want to use this solution? Kind of overkill if you just want it for the interface.

@chriscuthbertson

3 жыл бұрын

@@ayeapprove you would need an interface with as many inputs as you would have signals from your band (drum mics, guitar mics, vocal mics, DI's etc).... A xr18 is a great value 18 input interface as well as a mixer. IMO the only thing this is really replacing is the wireless packs.

@ayeapprove

3 жыл бұрын

@@chriscuthbertson I'm already running the xr18 with wireless packs. I don't use wireless for rehearsals, a headphone amp and a long cable is all you'd need.

Can this be used with a guitar, while playing live or is the latency too much? I have an axe fx. I want to plug into that and use this system to monitor through headphones wirelessly. Is that possible?

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

SoundCaster will broadcast any audio you can get into the Mac so just run your axe rig into a digital mixer or audio interface and you can get your mix wirelessly along with all the other instruments. You can control the volume of everything

Does it affect the licenses if one musician is on multiple instruments? ie. My band is 3 people but we'd need 7 lines (guitars, bass, vocals etc.) so would that still be 99 each?

@chazmorse8432

4 жыл бұрын

$99 for each member who will get the app on their phone. It can handle up to 16 channels of audio / 16 mono audio tracks.

@psymon1981

4 жыл бұрын

@@chazmorse8432 Lovely stuff

Can we use this software to spit everything back to front of house so they can still mix us? For a band with a drummer, 2 guitarists, a bass player and 3 vocalists what interface would we need?

@ayeapprove

4 жыл бұрын

You'd need around 16 channels and XLR splitters (cheapest way is the 2x Behringer ULTRALINK MS8000)

@ironblast5

3 жыл бұрын

To get all 16 channels thats $1,600 thats plus $200 or so for a router, add the cost of a iphone for each member, then you still need to buy the the iem's themself, a headphone amp for each phone as phones don't generally drive the in ears hard enough then you need splitters and cables you basically still need a rack to do this live and have it protected and pre routed. Then there's the fact it has no eq compression limiter or other sound shaping tools on board. I don't see how this really is saving much if any money and ends up reallying on over crowded wifi. In theory it sounds nice but in practice I don't see this being a good option for most professional live musicians

@ironblast5

3 жыл бұрын

@Guillaume Lortie my Behringer x18 mixer was $250, Anthem Five e2 custom mold iem's $158, Audio 2000 wireless was $170 per person, two Behringer ms 8000 splitters where $150 each,we already had a dual band router that was sufficient enough for the x18, we already had a rack case for the band so no additional cost there either. Cables are always going to add up and you will need them with both systems. The differences aren't huge in price between both systems if you add everything up to use each systems maximum potential. The big difference to me is wifi versus RF stability I personally think RF is more stable currently. If given the option id upgrade my wireless to the sennheiser g4 systems and network everything but thats abit cost prohibitive atm.

I will believe this is a gig worth product when Fluff replaces his X32 & Shure system with this and takes it out on the road.... until then IMO it's just a cool piece of tech

Where the Hell is FAQ Monday..lol. 🤘

question - can you use your macbooks ability to create a wifi network through sharing to use this ?

@christiankristalyn65

4 жыл бұрын

additionally, could you technically use your airpods/low latency bluetooth headphones to monitor from the phone? this probably wouldnt work at stage volumes, but if you were jamming with edrums/di guitar and bass it may work?

@chazmorse8432

4 жыл бұрын

Christian Kristalyn AirPods, and any Bluetooth headphones will have way too much additional latency to be used in this way unfortunately.

@chazmorse8432

4 жыл бұрын

Christian Kristalyn also the MacBooks WiFi would not be a fast enough connection, and also cause latency and connection issues.

I wanna know how do you connect this with the sound system at the venu?

@ayeapprove

4 жыл бұрын

you split your signals first.

@huguesgarcia2364

4 жыл бұрын

​@@ayeapprove Excuse me but let me understand: You come at a venu that has his own sound system. Your instruments, amps, etc... all have mics or DI to capture sound. Those mics and DI are connected to the main board. Problem, it depends of the size of the club. if it's small YOU handle the sound system and it's ok. A medium size club has his own board,and it has to be digital one. A large club has his own monitoring board on the side of the stage. I mean, if the owners doesn't want you to connect your computer to their board, you have to take all the XLR and plug them to your numeric board or soundcard . I think this is good for small bands, small clubs or big ones with a professional crew ( sound engineer, lights, etc....)

@ayeapprove

4 жыл бұрын

@@huguesgarcia2364 Most venues use stageboxes. You kindly ask if you can split the signals using your splitters (like Behringer Ultralink MS8000) before it even hits their boards. Best case scenario is that you also have a labeled multicore XLR out of your splitters and just plug those into their stagebox in the right order.

Sucks that it's only for Apple products. Would love to try this, you know, when we can play live again lol.

I would love to see how the inputs go Into the computer. That seemed like a very small input interface. You’d need at least a 8 input interface with everything patched in to the computer

@iAmDrigoSteel

3 жыл бұрын

Also add that the computer needs to be powerful enough to run everything at a low buffer latency as well

Two questions: What happens when you get a phone call? And... Do you plan to use it for Dragged Under?

@mckevrock

4 жыл бұрын

Airplane mode with Wi-Fi?

Any way this could be done without a laptop? I want to completely avoid laptops for live gigs. I use the Cymatic player for backing tracks and it has been rock solid.

@ch3nz3n

4 жыл бұрын

Short answer: No Long answer: The SoundCaster piece appears to need an OS to run on.

@bergglobus2428

4 жыл бұрын

Just Out of interest... Why won't you use a laptop? I mean DJs use them for ages

@pauliusmscichauskas558

4 жыл бұрын

@@bergglobus2428 For the mere convenience of pressing the "ON" button, and it just working during gigs. Dedicated devices are way more reliable and simple. That Cymatic player I have is like a big mp3 player, that has 16 outputs and MIDI... and it just works... You turn it on, select a playlist, and press "play"....

@bergglobus2428

4 жыл бұрын

@@pauliusmscichauskas558 yeah, that does make sense and might definitely be an advantage

@chriscuthbertson

3 жыл бұрын

@@pauliusmscichauskas558 There is an dedicated device that does this.... it's call a wireless transmitter. ;)

Yeah, about the no latency claim... that's pretty wrong, it has latency of course, and in fact is between 20 to 24 ms. There would be people that will not matter, and others that will matter, that will depend of each one.

🤘

Un fucking believable. I literally just bought and put Together an IEM system similar to fluffs just before the lockdown hit. So pissed off lol

It's VERY cool, no question about it... but you still need to own a good digital mixer and/or interface with several inputs...

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Yes. But you’ll want to get a good rack mount digital mixer if your going to build any kind of IEM rig. The Mackie DL16S or Presonus SL16R are $800 and the X32 is $1000 to $1200. You still need an external WiFI router for those mixers. Just get a really good WiFi router then it’s only $99 for CD Quality, stereo, wireless and personal monitor mixing

@guibollini6141

4 жыл бұрын

@@AudioFusionSystems Yes, totally true! Me and my band use a behringer X Air 18 and it works perfectly with our Sennheiser ew300 IEMs. Your product is a tremendous great deal for those that don't previously own a wireless system which is very budget friendly; congrats.

0:40 - Easy - Behringer XR18 + UHF iEM like LD Systems MEI100G2 + isolating earphones (KZ ZSN Pro + foam tips is the cheapest way out). For your typical 5 member band that's ~280 EUR per person - MONO that is. But you can run the software on any device (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS) and you have a 16 channel recording interface as well. Getting this AudioFusion System will give you STEREO but you have to include costs for an interface (at least 300 EUR), an approved router (~200 EUR), license fees (450 EUR for 5 members), Apple hardware is required ATM so that's an additional 250 EUR for a used macbook + headphones (20 EUR per person). All in all this will be around 250-260 EUR per person. It sure sounds like a good deal, if they can release a Windows/Android version it will help keeping costs down even more.

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

You only need an interface if your mixer is not digital or if doesn’t deliver multi channel audio through the USB. The XR18 connects with the Mac by simple USB. Then it’s just $99 per musician for CD quality stereo, wireless and Personal mixing all on one device.

@ayeapprove

4 жыл бұрын

@@AudioFusionSystems Well most bands usually don't have digital mixers or 16 channel interfaces. The XR18 uses WiFi with a built in access point so every person can change their monitoring mix. USB is only needed to record/playback tracks. 99$ sounds nice but has a bunch of preconditions not everyone has access to. In my calculation I already went for an old used macbook and I didn't even consider not all 5 people having iPhones.

So if your band has a digital mixer, you'd still need a Mac Mini or some sort of MAC to run the software (so $600+). And then a Dante or whatever card to get the audio tracks TO the Mac so you can broadcast it (so for a DL32R, which I have, that is another $500). PLUS the software. It's a lot of money. But it is still cheaper than getting in-ear systems by Shure. AND you will be getting a stereo feed.

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

ericdano you do need a Mac but the digital mixer can send multi channel audio through the USB out. Dante will work too but you don’t have to buy a Dante card.

@ericdannewitz8748

4 жыл бұрын

@@AudioFusionSystems Right, BUT if you have the computer hooked up to a Mackie DL32R, then you lose the ability to control the mixer from the iPad. Having Dante to the Mac, you would still have iPad (or ipads) control on the mixer but also keep the ability to send the dante streams to the Mac. So you could have a front of house guy control that sound using the iPad, and each band member could adjust their dante outputs on their iPads.

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Eric Dannewitz I had a DL32R (pre-Dante) and use the DL16S now which also doesn’t have Dante. In both cases I connect the Mackie to the Mac by USB to deliver audio to SoundCaster and use an iPad running Master Fader to control the mixer. Connecting by USB shouldn’t kill your ability to remotely control the mixer.

this would be ideal, i need to wait for them to make a Windows version now

wouldn't you need an amp for you headphones/earbuds?

@iEddiez

2 жыл бұрын

That's what the iPhone is doing

Wow that's a lot of work to get a good signal from in-ears!

No latency ?

👍🏻

Live music must be resurrected immediately.

@MrJHate

3 жыл бұрын

...which is completely irrelevant lol

StageWave is the best one hahaha

4k tv works that way with consoles and internet

The fact that it doesn't work for the number one phone provider (Samsung) really sucks but this is dope. Too bad lots of people can't utilize without buying a new phone

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

We are in development on the Android version of Performer. Be sure to subscribe to our email list so we can keep you updated.audiofusionsystems.com/contact-us/

I wonder how the latency would be using bluetooth headphones, like AirPods or something

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

The bluetooth technology really does add too much latency to use it in live performance. Its getting better, and better all the time but, for now, you'll need to use use wired in-ears. We have an app called Director that the monitor engineer can use to listen in to each musician's mix and can help with the mixing. That app runs on an iPad and works perfectly with Bluetooth headphones. The additional 40 or 50 milliseconds of latency is no big deal to those who are not performing.

@kal_vio

4 жыл бұрын

@@AudioFusionSystems do you mean milliseconds? Haha

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Kal Vio ha! Yes!

Back when I worked for an audio system company we tried some of the WiFi transmitter receiver gear mainly mics but the latency is not an issue we encountered however if you are in a live setting and people are using they’re phones you get drop outs and interference just a warning

I asked about this on gearslutz back in like 2014 and was told it was literally impossible

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Ha! Well it kinda was back then. 802.11ac made it do-able

I invested considerable less buying a traditional system that doesn't rely on over crowded wifi. Behringer x18 mixer with audio 2000 wireless systems full stereo mixes and I can use my android phone if i want to control it

This would save loads of headaches but I am a PC/Android user sadly...

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

We are in development on the Android version of Performer. The Windows version of SoundCaster will follow

@iEddiez

4 жыл бұрын

@@AudioFusionSystems made my day

Would be great if they had it for Android since it is the most popular phone system in the world! Just saying! $100 is a lot of money for 1's and 0's as well. I understand the savings, but there's already that chincy hadrware piece that Xlive that came out for in ears for about the same price! Then if you already own a Behringer digital mixer you can set up digital mixes and send them to your band that way through the phone app! Might need to buy a chincy small headphone amp for each musician(Maudio makes one for $39) if need be. Oh and the Behringer way uses Android or Iphone, so not everyone HAS TO HAVE the same phone system! You can use what you want!

Only available for Iphones.

You forgot to say that is available only within macOS and iOS combo.

I'm drooling a little if I'm being honest....

You would still need a mixer/interface to get the audio from the main console and a strong laptop for the software, right?

2️⃣😎

You have a DAW and gear. Before you claim 0/zero latency, record and compare a click track sound's waveform from source direct to DAW vs. routing to wifi monitor iPhone output. Let's see your results.

@PBKman

4 жыл бұрын

Using the back of my napkin, the time it takes sound to go from the floor wedge to my ears about 6ft/2m away is 1.8 milliseconds. If the latency of the wifi is close to 2 ms, it's the same as a floor wedge.

@PBKman

4 жыл бұрын

My biggest concern would be all the other WIFIs in the neighborhood playing RockEmSockEm Robots trying to knock off my router's noggin.

Ideally you'd need to get a WiFi 6 router but in truth no system right now can even handle the speeds that can be capable with WiFi 6 right now. I assume this can only be used on a localized private system so you cannot stream audio over the internet similar to video over IP (VOIP). The real question that needs to be answered is how can you create a system like Dante that can operate over WiFi. Sending hundreds of raw audio tracks over WiFi with minimal latencey 5ms-50ms.

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

John Gormley this system uses standard networking protocols so you can use Dante or USB. It is currently limited to broadcasting 16 channels to 16 devices but that will increase soon!

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

We have a number of WiFi routers we recommend including one really good one with WiFi 6 to future proof your setup. We do recommend that you set up a dedicated network that is not connected to the internet. audiofusionsystems.com/support/choosing-the-right-gear/

My band recently upgraded to a Soundcraft digital rack mixer and we are using some LD systems wireless units* with it. It's not that expensive, it's very flexible (you can control it from any device that has WiFi and a Browser), very powerful (built-in EQ and effects, automatic feedback suppression, and even rudimentary amp modelling) and it works great. I mean if your band is using a MacBook anyway, you already have an audio interface and enough channels and everybody has an iPhone, you might as well use that. But these are a lot of rather expensive prerequisites in order for this to even become an option. Also that's a lot of potential points of failure. * You can also share a single LD systems MEI1000 unit between two band members if all you need is a mono signal. Let's say your band has 4 members. The Soundcraft Ui16 (379€) would probably provide enough channels. You'd then need two LD systems MEI 1000 (2x 268€) and two additional receivers (2x 164€), which makes 1243€. Of course every band member needs some device (a smartphone or tablet will do) in order to control his/her own mix, but that's it. If you need more channels (for more band members, stereo outputs, or more mics), you might want to invest in a Ui24 (707€). But that's still not that expensive.

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

If you have the UI24R then you wouldn’t need any kind of audio interface. The SoundCraft would deliver multi channel audio over USB to the Mac. You typically need/want an external router anyway so then it’s just $99 per musician for CD quality stereo, wireless and personal mixing... if you have the Mac

@Pfaeff

4 жыл бұрын

​@@AudioFusionSystems I don't think we're ever going to need a router, since it wouldn't do anything for us. If we ever needed internet for our cheap recording PC (which is not a Mac), then we'd simply use any smartphone as a mobile hotspot. I get what you're saying and there are certainly bands for which your product would be the absolute right choice. I personally think it is a really cool idea. I'm just arguing that the alternatives for bands like mine are not as expensive as Fluff is making them out to be.

So what if the venue has shite wi-fi or doesn't offer Wi-Fi at all?

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

You definitely want to bring your own powerful WiFi router to set up a dedicated network for your band. Not even connected to the internet.

@roybuis7646

4 жыл бұрын

@@AudioFusionSystems Oh okay, so it's just Wi-Fi frequencies and has nothing to do with being connected to the internet?

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Roy Buis exactly!

Great news! now do it for android, I'll purchase the shit out of it)

Can someone please list all the cons they can think of? I'm strongly considering this, but don't want to spend $500 and it be a waste.

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Hi Russ, you can invest in a router that you can return and try it out for free in Gear Test Mode. You can hear the sound quality for yourself. Do you have a digital mixer or audio interface?

@russbradshawmusic

4 жыл бұрын

@@AudioFusionSystems my band has several interfaces.

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Russ Bradshaw in that case you could pick up a good WiFi router which is returnable if you don’t love the system. audiofusionsystems.com/support/choosing-the-right-gear/

@BrandonWhalen

3 жыл бұрын

Try the demo brother!

Apple only? M8. Not good enough.

Fuck, the ultimate goal for this concept should be monitoring VIA BLUETOOTH. Oh yeah, and making Android versions aswell lol

I mean you can already do this in Reaper 6.

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Really? We’ll certainly check it out! I hadn’t heard of any DAW delivering audio over WiFi

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Eventually we think all DAW and mixers will have this technology built in.

@vladv5126

4 жыл бұрын

@@AudioFusionSystems yep, it's fairly recent and I think is actually intended so you can operate the daw via wifi but it can be used as a monitoring system. Can't vouch for the latency though as I haven't really tested it properly

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Vlad V oh sure. All the digital mixers and some DAW give you the ability to control your mix over WiFi. But you still have to get the audio from the computer or mixer to the musicians... cables or wireless packs. Our system is the only one that is actually delivering the audio over WiFi; not just the controls. We hope to license this technology to those companies

@vladv5126

4 жыл бұрын

@@AudioFusionSystems no, I mean you can actually use the phones as bodypacks through it.

that could be cool, but it is not for android devices

Left out the $1000-$2000 cost of iphones for each user. 🎶🎸

@northtimo666

4 жыл бұрын

Many people already have them in their pockets.

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

iPhone 6 at Walmart $99 www.walmart.com/ip/Straight-Talk-Prepaid-Apple-iPhone-6-32GB-Space-Gray/329264833

If this was available for Android I'd be breaking out my debit card... But its not! Damn it!

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Android is in development. Be sure to subscribe to our email list so we can keep you updated

@christopherheadcase6886

4 жыл бұрын

Now that is what I'm talking about!

Yes, this is really cool...but I’ve got an even better solution. The truth is that MOST musicians get onstage, stand in one place and stay there for the entire set. I’m a pretty active performer and when I got sick of my wireless guitar rig acting up I ditched it and haven’t looked back. The point is, you said “In Ear Monitoring System” and you’re right for a WIRELESS IEM rig you’re looking at thousands of dollars, but as we’ve previously discussed we don’t all need wireless solutions do we? What if I told you you could use a piece of hardware that costs you $40? Buy a Behringer P2 and a long xlr. The end. I’ve done several short tours now with them and they are a GODSEND. Most engineers are fine with you unplugging the send to their wedge because it eliminates feedback and there is literally zero other equipment or setup required. The sound quality is perfect because it isn’t wireless and you can set up your entire band for $40 apiece. The WiFi setup is cool, but you left out the most important part, how do you get those inputs to your interface? If you show up to a show with that rig how much repatching and frustration is that going to cause? If there are any other bands with a typical rig the engineer will have to completely redo the mix setups to send each instrument out a single bus and then put it back for the next band. As an engineer, I might do that ONCE to see how it works and that’s probably it. So unless you’re bringing your own jump snake or taking an AES jump off my stagebox you’re not getting those individual channels.

99$ for a single connection 😱

I am 100 percent sure he will still not switch

The idea for this product ist very cool, but first you need to invest in an iPhone :D Sry but this is more expensive than a traditional wireless in-ear monitoring

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Actually you can buy a new iPhone 6s at Walmart for only $99. Not a bad price for a stereo, wireless IEM receiver with a touch screen to control your own mix

No android??? That's lame. For the cost of a MAC and iphone you could get regular pro grade monitoring systems. Too bad. Would have definitely bought it.

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

We actually started developing this technology on PC/Android but, at that time, the latency of the Android devices was not usable so we switched to iOS. The Android devices now have caught up so we are in development on the Android version of Performer

@BasementGAS

4 жыл бұрын

@@AudioFusionSystems Very cool! Thanks for replying. Any idea when the rollout will be? Even an estimate would be useful.

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Basement GAS the Android beta testing will begin later this summer

@BasementGAS

4 жыл бұрын

@@AudioFusionSystems I'll be happy to be a beta tester if you need one.

@AudioFusionSystems

4 жыл бұрын

Basement GAS be sure to subscribe to our email list so we can keep you updated audiofusionsystems.com/contact-us/

StageWave is way better :)

now you just need to spend a few 1000 on Apple stuff....

@jamsscott

4 жыл бұрын

Could buy an iPhone 6 for $150 at Walmart compared to $300-$400 for a wireless pack

@Snivic-music

4 жыл бұрын

@@jamsscott that would still require a macbook though and those are pricey

@jamsscott

4 жыл бұрын

Vince-Snivic sometimes Facebook marketplace sell them for a good deal I’d go with a 2015 MacBook if you’re on a budget

NOT HARD

@rip3401

4 жыл бұрын

WHERE DO I GET ONE

@rip3401

4 жыл бұрын

MAKE EMAILS NICE BACKTRACK

Please stop saying "No latency". It's not physically possible over WiFi. "Low latency" or "acceptable latency" is a fair enough way to describe it. "No latency" suggests that the latency is the same as analogue systems and it's just not.

@RiffsAndBeards

4 жыл бұрын

No latency

@chrisact9601

4 жыл бұрын

@@RiffsAndBeards Haha. Touche, Sir.

Ho-ly-fuck

Apple-exclusive...typical...sigh...

Cmon guys just get a Mac ;)

@ayeapprove

4 жыл бұрын

nah, thanks