If I ran Waymo, I would hire Anthony Levandowski | George Hotz and Lex Fridman

Ғылым және технология

Lex Fridman Podcast full episode: • George Hotz: Hacking t...
Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors:
- Four Sigmatic: foursigmatic.com/lex and use code LexPod to get up to 40% & free shipping
- Decoding Digital: appdirect.com/decoding-digital
- ExpressVPN: expressvpn.com/lexpod and use code LexPod to get 3 months free
PODCAST INFO:
Podcast website: lexfridman.com/podcast
Apple Podcasts: apple.co/2lwqZIr
Spotify: spoti.fi/2nEwCF8
RSS: lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/
Full episodes playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast
Clips playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast Clips
CONNECT:
- Subscribe to this KZread channel
- Twitter: / lexfridman
- LinkedIn: / lexfridman
- Facebook: / lexfridmanpage
- Instagram: / lexfridman
- Medium: / lexfridman
- Support on Patreon: / lexfridman

Пікірлер: 25

  • @rey82rey82
    @rey82rey823 жыл бұрын

    Way mo money

  • @eceertrey1
    @eceertrey13 жыл бұрын

    that George dude is right

  • @rupanshuyadav4483
    @rupanshuyadav44833 жыл бұрын

    Pardoned

  • @_____case
    @_____case3 жыл бұрын

    It's clear that Waymo's strategy revolves around the idea that a single death caused by the Waymo Driver is unacceptable. So yes, they will probably take a very long time to penetrate the entire U.S. market, but their approach feels safer to me.

  • @1flash3571

    @1flash3571

    3 жыл бұрын

    Have you heard of NASA, or ULA? Waymo is same as NASA, or ULA. Waymo should be more like SpaceX.

  • @meesee6413

    @meesee6413

    3 жыл бұрын

    ​@@1flash3571 NASA started from scratch and sent a man to the moon in a decade. SpaceX took proven tech developed over half a century by soviets and NASA and commercialized it. You mind as well be telling the Wright brothers to forget about their stupid plane and just skip ahead to building 747's.

  • @1flash3571

    @1flash3571

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@meesee6413 You don't seem to get what I am trying to say, so listen up more closely. Why do you think NASA was able to get to the moon in a decade???? It was because they were not afraid of failures, but now they are. They are more like Blue Origin which haven't done much besides launch a suborbital rocket. SpaceX isn't afraid of failures and on a small budget. You seem to forget that SpaceX improved their engine even after it was successful. They don't stop innovating. Gov't unfortunately isn't equipped mentally to failures. Same with ULA. They are there to make as much money as possible. All I am saying is that NASA needs to change their mentality and have a startup mentality.

  • @meesee6413

    @meesee6413

    3 жыл бұрын

    ​@@1flash3571 I understand what you're saying, I'm just disagreeing with you. There are some people who don't think progress at all costs is worth it when it comes to sacrificing human lives. NASA had a steady supply of money and human guinea pigs ready to die for the mission. If you think this is how spacex treats their manned flight program vs their cargo missions, you are ignorant. NASA is the main customer for the crew capsule and has final say on every aspect of it, including safety and risk tolerance. If you want to use untested AV tech made by Uber or some startup bro, go for it champ. Just do it on your own closed circuit where you won't take anyone out with you. I'll be happy to wait for a slow moving, methodical company to release a finished product rather than have my death be used as a data point to train some ML algo on how not to drive.

  • @FuriousImp

    @FuriousImp

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@meesee6413 A lot to unpack here. First of all - The Wright brothers believed we would never be able to cross the Atlantic. The guys that invented the heavier than air flying machine! Now, there is an analogue there - it's however not based on imagination, rather, sadly, on profit incentive. Yes they've made the first step - and yes, for instance the Merlin engine and all of its many iterations was developed on an engine created by NASA - but look at the Raptor. No one could crack that cookie! And they did it! They're at and above 380 bar now!!! Talk about reusability... they are the only game in town! And no... don't get started on auto pilot and the current FSD beta. Those systems are fantastic - listen to the experts such as George Hotz - the only game in town is Tesla.

  • @Andre-ff4hp
    @Andre-ff4hp3 жыл бұрын

    Scientists are always the game changers and they are only interested in the invention (Nikola. Tesla, Marija Sedlovska-Curi) but top inventions have firs to past through the hands of politicians or military, people are last users. What to say if u are man who didn't make invention but all new industry and you can not know where it will goes, or are people ready for it. Like Nobel, and Nobel dinamit , he had good intentions but the most people died from that dinamit.

  • @3dagedesign
    @3dagedesign3 жыл бұрын

    is this guy the source for "big head" from silicon valley

  • @zoltanszeles9394

    @zoltanszeles9394

    3 жыл бұрын

    Was "big head" smart and arrogant? I don't think so.

  • @anthonysummit3098

    @anthonysummit3098

    3 жыл бұрын

    Probably more like that guy who was hired to do the cloud

  • @wyllmRox
    @wyllmRox3 жыл бұрын

    who tf is and tony lev and ow ski

  • @sweetlife2730
    @sweetlife27303 жыл бұрын

    Pardon me?

  • @meesee6413
    @meesee64133 жыл бұрын

    When someone says "I don't really make moral decisions" when asked if someone he admires is a good person, the answer is no.

  • @meesee6413

    @meesee6413

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@mgm8075 Neither of us can truly know his motives, or anyone else's for that matter. And while you are definitely entitled to an opinion on what you think it is, my opinion is that his main driving motive appears to be self interest ($$$) rather than advancing humanity. But I'm a cynical asshole so I would prefer to entertain your opinion if I could rewire my brain.

  • @saab182
    @saab1823 жыл бұрын

    why does George think the silicon valley model has to be applied to Waymo to succeed? Honestly, the Silicon Valley model is not suitable for anything outside of software that requires patience and heavy lifting. Innovation preceded Silicon Valley. If you listen to Chamath's talk at Stanford, most SV models focus on metrics on paper for VCs to make money on each round while risk keeps on ballooning up until it goes public to hapless shareholders portfolio. Not saying that George is right, but there are a million ways to do things and get it right. There are lots of companies that look good on growth... and later implode.

  • @aidilmubarock5394

    @aidilmubarock5394

    3 жыл бұрын

    Spacex and tesla can do it, why can't waymo?

  • @mccrorymain
    @mccrorymain3 жыл бұрын

    of course you don't hire anthony levandowski. He stole technology that he helped build, and was paid handsomely for at another company. He needs to spend some amount of time in jail to learn what he did wrong. After that, perhaps he can re-join the industry. Being talented should never give you a license to be unethical, and he was egregiously unethical, and got caught. - There are other very talented people in the autonomous industry who, i'm sure, can also accomplish impressive things similarly to him.

  • @xaxfixho

    @xaxfixho

    Жыл бұрын

    John 8v7 “Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone ...”

Келесі