Whether you hate ibn Taymiah or like him, one has to admit that he truly was a genius.

@Ahmed-pp2gp

4 жыл бұрын

How can someone hate shaykh al Islam rahimahu Allah

@toxic-2197

3 жыл бұрын

@F Haque abdul wahab who created his own ideology afyer reading ibn taymiyyahs works, also worked with the zionist British in taking down the ottomon empire

@toxic-2197

3 жыл бұрын

@F Haque since then, theres always been the najdi movement. Wahabism and salafism who are double standard people.

@user-ky8ym7le9m

3 жыл бұрын

@@firqahnajiyah1 says the person that’s acting like a 12 year old.

@toxic-2197

3 жыл бұрын

@@firqahnajiyah1 yeh thats why I said double standard, cuz some claim to be from hanbali where as some are against the 4 imams. Man saying im the 12 year old when your acting like one. If you have nothing good to say then keep quiet.

Thank you for this fine presentation. I studied Islam and ME history for quite a few decades when I was still Christian. Even then, I could see the power of ibn Tayymiyyah's mind. He clearly had a first rate mind--I believed that even though I wasn't Muslim and disagreed with Islam. As a recent revert to Islam, I'm even more impressed with Tayymiyyah's insight and realize even more how important he is. If we don't study this man's work, we are missing one of the powerful figures in Islamic intellectual history.

@scarfaceyam145

7 ай бұрын

Spot on brother

Alhumdulilah such a beautiful talk. May Allah raise the ranks of Imam Ahmed and Imam Ibn Taymiyyah who dedicated their lives and faced persecutions for the preservation of Aqeedah of the Salafs.

@Jerometttt145

3 жыл бұрын

I love u brother for that comment

@Hassan-hh6mu

2 жыл бұрын

This has absolutely nothing to do with the Aqeedah of Salaf us Salih and Khalaf may Allah be pleased with them all, and then you wonder why he was persecuted and put in jail multiple times by prominent Sunni scholars. "There is nothing in the book of Sunnah, nor in the statements of the Salaf, or Imams of the nation that He (Allah) is not a body and His features are not a body" Source: Bayan Talbis al-Jahamia, Volume 1, Page 101. God is also a beardless, curly haired, young man who rides on a mosquito: "We conclude that it was eyesight as it is in the Sahih narration from Qutada from Ikrama from Ibn Abbas who narrated that the Prophet said:'I saw my God in an image of a beardless (young man), with long curly hair in a green garden." Source: Al-Tasis fi al-rad ala Asas al-Taqdis byibn Taymiyya, Volume3, Page214. "He permits the possibility of His sitting on a mosquito's back" Source: Al-Beshara wa al-thaf Allamah by Hassan al-Saqqaf, Page 21. If He (God) wants, He can sit on a mosquito's back. Source: Bayan Talbis al-Jahamia by ibn Taymiyya, Volume 1, Page 568. Ibn Taimiyah cited this text from Sheikh al-Daremi and he wrote that he believed in it. Interestingly, there is a similar belief in Judaism, because they believe God rides on an angel. We read in the The Old Testament, Book of Samuel, 22:11 (King James version): "And he rode upon acherub, and did fly.: and he was seen upon the wings of the wind." Enough about your gods attributes, let's see what ways of transportation he uses to get to his intended destination: "Allah is able to relocate from here to there through rope" Source: Majmu'a al-Fatawa, Volume 2, Page 76.

@khaja84

Жыл бұрын

Aameen

@Ryan-lf6ds

Жыл бұрын

@Ahmad when ashari means intellectual, wahhabi. 🤣

some of these comments are truly saddening. if any of you feel like ibn taymiaah (r) is wrong about something, it is okay. however, it is not okay to insult him ( dead man ) or his many followers. after all we can differ in opinions, and opinions can change with experiences. to comment " ibn taymiyyah is a kafir " or " stupid " without reading any of his work, is merely ignorance. love each other for gods sakes, we are limited beings.

@naturelover5891

7 жыл бұрын

Anyome who hates ISIS must hate the Shias. Shias pioneered suicide bombing in 1983, more than two decades before ISIS took up the baton from them

@eatle7604

7 жыл бұрын

Mustafaplays I agree, brother. Ibn Taymiyya (ra.), is dead. Regardless of his controversies, we must pay respect

@GreasyVid

7 жыл бұрын

Nature Lover shut up Wahhabism is bigger enemy then even shia, atleast shia don't pretend to be sunnis. u are kufar Wahhabi who wants to divert the issue to shia, nice try. I don't hate isis for suicide bombings, I hate them because they follow an infidel named ibn taymiyyah

@naszam3778

7 жыл бұрын

Mustafaplays but most salafis haven't read his work either and still hold him to such a high status.. no one had heard of ibn taymiyyah for hundreds of years he was a average mind it was only 2 hundreds years ago his teachings came out again.. you are the product of suadi Arabia pumping billions into the movement

@sharps8726

7 жыл бұрын

Have you read all his works brother?

Super like. Rasulullah (SA) said in one hadith narrated by Ibn ‘Abbaas: “Reflect on the creation of God but do not reflect on God.”

I keep revisiting to your topics to refresh and re-orient myself everytime when I feel I have lost the plot and refresh myself of the subject matters. May Allah keep you healthy and safe from getting dragged into any political leanings. May Allah continue to bless you with akal and eeman. Jazak Allah Khairun.

Thank you for your explanation. May Allah bless you

I appreciate your intellectual explanations. Alhamdulillah ! Allahuakbar !

Sounds like a pure masterpiece! Can't wait till your dissertation is published Shaykna, so that we all can benefit from your research & thesis, insha Allah! :D

When I first read the name of these book in a biography of Ibn Taymiyyah rahimahullah, I wished to read it. Jazakallahu Khair Mr. Yasir Qadhi for giving us the essence of the book and wallahi, my respect to Shaykh ul Islam increased manifolds after hearing the elegance of his arguments. May Allah have mercy on him.

Beutiful explaination Sheik Yasir Qadi,May Allah give us more intellectual like of Yasir Qadi

Mashallah, much love and respect to Shaikh Yasir Qadhi. Its humbling to learn the immense knowledge of the scholars of the past.

very thought provoking lecture, jazakullah!

Subhan Allah, Shaykh ul Islam ibn Taymiyya (r) was truly the epitome of what a Scholar should be ...and a mind like his is really what is needed in our times! The greatest battles are the battles of the intellect, only the feeble mind resort to derogatory and vulgar language or worse, physical harm when critiquing their opponent who belongs to a different group or sect. Shaykh ul Islam ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullah) is the perfect example of an intellectual brilliance and personality that was way ahead of his time and his works are just mind blowing, only if people understood the genius of his writings - may Allah have Mercy on him and bless us to walk his footsteps for the betterment of the Ummah, Allahumma ameen.

@firdhousr

9 жыл бұрын

Sorry to say that this guy is a Dhajjal not just misleading the Muslims but also the entire Americans and others. The time of general public is precious and there are plenty of things they have to know. This kind of philosophical matters should be limited to be discussed among scholars or specialized study purpose the way he did for his Doctorate. The mere fact that this guy is discussing all these difficult matters with general public is the proof the this guy does not have proper idea of Quran eventually Islam. Ibn Thaymiah and F Razi discussed issues related to their time which should be analized in their context but not in the modern time. What we need is to analyze the scriptures (Quran and Hadeeth) according to the modern time and its challenges; and find out practical mechanisms which suite the modern time. Please convey this message to this guy and let him stop spreading falsehood otherwise they won’t be no option than targeting further.

@GreasyVid

7 жыл бұрын

sunnis called ibn taymiyyah an apostate only Wahhabi imposters like yourself love him

@eatle7604

7 жыл бұрын

Systems Academy Your explanation was so good. Too bad you had to resort to Dhajjal calling... that was poor.

@sharps8726

7 жыл бұрын

Ibn Taymiyya = Saudi Arabia.

@imaginx806

7 жыл бұрын

No they are not based on him but someone after that called Muhammad ibn Abd-al Wahhab

Thanks, really appreciate your thoughts. I just wanted to know about Ibne Tammya, in Urdu , unfortunately couldn’t find any book in Urdu , but this lecture did help. So, once we have Iman that’s all matters, we don’t have to go in ever ayat and looking for a philosophy behind it. Thanks To Allah, Quran is for everyone, Allah knows his creation , only 4 or 5 % of people who reached to the top of Maslow’s hierarchy. What Rasool peace be upon him gives us we need to follow. Jazakallah brother Qadhi

@Abul_kutub

4 жыл бұрын

Moulana abul hasan nadwi has one volume on ibn taymiya which goes by the name tarik dawat wa azeemat it has also been translated in english by the title saviours of islamic spirit

@dayan47

2 ай бұрын

Better for you as a Muslim to learn Arabic . Ibn Taymiyya said it is fard Ayn for every Muslim.=obligatory.

JazakAllah khair shaikh. Very interesting

[35:12] Amazing point. Great lecture in general. Jazakallahu khair.

Baraka Allah in your PhD! Thank you for the Excellent lesson.

Great lecture, Jazakallah khair

Fascinating! Allahumma barik. JazakAllahu khayr.

Immensely enjoyed watching this

A 1000 extra likes. Allahuma barik feeka ya Shaykhana

Thank you so much for this information. It as causes me to go to the library.

I would love to read the full dissertation. Amazing

@user-sl1mw6vo1e

3 жыл бұрын

Me too

@jasenkosaric1145

3 жыл бұрын

I agree. Shaikh al Islaam ibn Taymiyyah was amazing.

@alkarrafi7645

3 жыл бұрын

archive.org/details/YasirQadhiDissertation/page/n13/mode/2up

@One-py3yp

3 жыл бұрын

@@alkarrafi7645 Jazak allahu khair brother/sister :)

Amazing lecture Simple to understand Thanks alot 😊❤

Masha Allah sheikh... Very nicely put forward... I hope people understand...

Wonderful and intellectual. I am an Ashari Sunni, and I truly enjoyed this lecture. Allama Yasir has done a good job, but please please have cross dialogue with Ashairah like Hamza Yusuf, Sh Asrar Rasheed, Sh al Yaqoubi. This would be great service done

@shuaibmohammedc

2 жыл бұрын

His some of the claims is problematic, he call theology as pseudo science...

@tataoma9976

2 жыл бұрын

Imam Ahmed (the only imam of the 4 to live in that time) opposed the ashari aqeedah May Allah guide us to the truth

@jj-yi1ne

4 ай бұрын

@@shuaibmohammedc it is a pseudo science

@jj-yi1ne

4 ай бұрын

@@tataoma9976 no he did not

Watching Dr. Yasir's presentation of his PhD on Ibn Taymiyyah is intriguing. Particularly when Dr. Yasir shows Ibn Taymiyyah as the pianeer who nigated and refuted all mutakallim contradicting to themselves. In reality Ibn Taymiyyah himselves immensves articulated about properties of Allah rendering hugely on his own intelectual capacity. With respect from Uzbekistan..

Enjoying this very much.

Masha Allah and Dr Yasir Qadhi see you soon on 3rd of April in Manchester

People just have no idea the weight of the words that they are saying. May Allah have mercy on Ibn Taymiyyah, and may He have mercy on all the righteous scholars of Islam, ameen.

The best 1 hour and 10 minutes I invested in KZread.

@Aa-fg6jf

6 ай бұрын

I wish it was a 10 hour

Can anybody add subtitle (english)? Because we'll translate but some words that we do not understand. Please?

I cannot stop loving sheikh ibn taymiya, if only Shia and Sufi and other sects understand him, he takes us scripturaly and logically to Islam of first generation.

@benzyan9237

2 жыл бұрын

the only ones who are in a sect are the followers of ibn taymiah's anthropomorphism he said that god is like a young man with long blond hair running in a meadow your guru is a schizophrenical psychopath without saud's hell money you would never have heard about him

@hasanbilgrami5735

Жыл бұрын

Understand that he ascribed attributes of human face, eyes, hands etc etc to Allah (swt). Lahawlawala quwwat

@hasanbilgrami5735

Жыл бұрын

@Path of Sahaba kzread.info/dash/bejne/kZeFpMufccbWh84.html this is just a glimpse for what is about to come for you InshaALLAH. InshaALLAH will discuss about his life and why many known sunni ulamas declared him as kafir. But if you still refute to all the statements then brother you are on the path of kufr. And what is this path of sahaba? Did they bring Islam or was it Holy Prophet (saww)? If you deem all the sahabas to be guided then brother you need to be schooled about that too.

@AlbaMBBT

5 ай бұрын

​@@hasanbilgrami5735 If Kalam theologans will reinterpret this verse about estewaa (being above the throne) because the act of being above a throne is human-like then they have to deny and reinterpret the hundreds of verses that describe Allah as seeing, hearing and speaking for these are indeed human-like as well. Of course Kalam and Ashari theologans will respond that the divine attributes of seeing, hearing, and speaking are in a modality كيفية that is befitting his Majesty and glory compared to those of man. Ibn Taymeyyah and the Salaf before him demand that the same principle should be applied to the attribute of estewaa (being above the throne) as well. i.e God's estewaa above his throne is of a modality that is befitting to his Majesty and unlike that of man. It's the same principles when it comes to all Allah's attributes. We don't cherry pick based on our whims. Ibn Taymeyyah and the salaf's position is very clear and straightforward when it comes to divine attributes: we should describe Allah only with the terms that He or His prophet used to describe Him and negate what Allah and his prophet negated. That's why Ibn Taymeyyah refused to affirm or deny corporialism as it wasn't affirmed or denied by Allah or his prophet, so we don't go there and we don't speak about God without knowledge. We do not reinterpret what we simply don't like with our reasoning because human reasoning is limited to what we experienced in this earthly life where nothing is like God.

The core of Tanzeeh is to believe that Allah is ABSOLUTELY beyond need and comparison. Hence, believing that Allah is a spatial entity or something with a size, shape, or form, is tantamount to tashbeeh (resembling Allah to the creations). Abu Ja`far At-Tahawi said: "Allah is supremely clear of all boundaries, extremities, sides, organs, and appendages. None of the six directions contain Allah as is the case with all the originated beings."

@remonation24

5 жыл бұрын

Ali G this is the true sunni creed

How does anyone get a copy of the dissertation, can we read it online.

I am trying to find a lecture on ibn taymiyas belief in existence of multiple worlds. Can anyone help on this please.

people hate ibn taymiyyah but they never studied nor do they know the Arabic to read them, ask them the conditions of the shahadah they're instead list football players names loool go write a 10volume book against the shia if you can.

To all the people spreading hate and filth below it really shows what is in your hearts. Fear Allah swt if you have any iman and speak good or remain silent. And please stop pretending to be scholars and giving fatwa on who was guided or misguided, and go learn how to read surah Fatiha.

@dalmar5567

5 жыл бұрын

iera uk@ Well said bro

Beautiful lecture 💞

So much venom here below against Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahu'llah), it could make one sick! Truly the devil has beautified your actions in your own eyes. Does God Almighty have a face? Yes, that's what HE says in the Qur'an. Does He have two hands? Yes, that's what HE says in the Qur'an. Can we ever imagine or understand what's meant by those words? Never! Not in this life. So who gave YOU the right to negate those attributes or to interpret them as per YOUR own whims and intellectual taste? This is NOT tajseem/anthropomorphism! It is simply an affirmation of God's own words WITHOUT any interpretation whatsoever. May Allah guide those who genuinely seek His guidance.

@mohammedhanif6780

8 жыл бұрын

excuse me brother, can you please reference where Allah says He has hands or a face?

@fadial-mufti2338

8 жыл бұрын

Mohammed Hanif Dear Brother, if you're asking for an Aya that says something like: "I have a face" per se or "I have hands" per se, then you obviously won't find such ayat. However, if you're asking for a literal reference to Allah's hands and face in the Qur'an, then please read below. Reference to Allah's two hands in Aya 75 of Surat Sad: قال يا إبليس ما منعك أن تسجد لما خلقت بيدي أستكبرت أم كنت من العالين Here Allah (SWT) says: "I've created with my (own) two hands". Reference to Allah's face in Aya 27 of Surat Ar-Rahman: ويبقى وجه ربك ذو الجلال والإكرام

@mohammedhanif6780

8 жыл бұрын

Fadi Al-Mufti​ dear brother, Then when you wrote earlier: "yes that is what He says in the Quran" in reference to face and hands, you were making ta'weel and not taking these verses literally? You were.actually interpreting those verses despite saying you weren't. The strict non-interpretive understanding of those 2 verses would be 1. God created with two Hands 2. The Face of our Rabb will remain without saying He has two Hands or a Face or what these refer two. My problen is that you seem to condemn some Muslims for interpreting these verses but you do so as well. 

@fadial-mufti2338

8 жыл бұрын

Mohammed Hanif Brother, may I ask you if you are an Arab yourself?

@mohammedhanif6780

8 жыл бұрын

Fadi Al-Mufti no, I'm not an Arab.

#1 Yasser Kadhi. Love the Sheikh for the sake of Almighty Allah...

Jazakallah khair ya shaikh

MashaAllah

Ibn taymiyya, the sun of his century and those who came after them, may ALLAH swt has His mercy and blessings on him

Wallahi this is exactly what is happening in our modern times

بارك الله فيك يا شيخ ما شاء الله عليك بارك الله لك في علمك

@abotrump5186

2 жыл бұрын

هو مع او ضد ابن تيمية

@abdelhakelalaoui5430

2 жыл бұрын

@@abotrump5186 هذا شيخ باكستاني ما شاء عليه نابغة، و هو من اشد الناس تمسكا بمنهج شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية

I do really hope that i can watch the Q&A session. It must be interesting.

could not be more clear than this, may allah bless Dr. Sheikh yasir qadhi and people who made this content available to us

@fadial-mufti2338

9 жыл бұрын

abdullah al mahmud Ameen!

@abbaslegend9214

4 жыл бұрын

Ameen❤

Can anyone please tell me names of the books Dr Yasir Qadhi has mentioned in his lecture please?

@nadera1830

2 жыл бұрын

درء تعارض العقل والنقل

Asalam Aleikom, Imam Qadhi. I was wondering if it was possible to find your dissertation online? Hassan Hussein, Stockholm.

@rehanmir4560

4 жыл бұрын

Type in google: "Yasir Qadhi Dissertation" click the link of the archives

@One-py3yp

3 жыл бұрын

archive.org/details/YasirQadhiDissertation/page/n13/mode/2up This is the link to it, inshallah it helps :)

Genius. If only current 'salafis' and touters of 'hanabila' had the academic and intellectual discipline of the Ibn Taymiyya they talk of following. Mashallah. Rahimahullah.

@sheikh I want the book of ibn taymiyyah in English can you make your theses in book format because I use to read the books of imam ibn taymiyyah as well as yours too please send me your book in pdf format

@naturelover5891

7 жыл бұрын

If Shayk ul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah is not a Muslim, who is? You? You Ahlul takfeeri?

@a.n4524

4 жыл бұрын

Mackyvelli Takifirist

MashaAllah.

ibn taymiyyah may Allah pleased with him . is a legendarily person

@AbuLuLu313

4 жыл бұрын

May Allah curse him

@rabikhan589

3 жыл бұрын

@@AbuLuLu313 May Allah be pleased with ALL the Sahaba, that includes Umar and Abu Bakr (RA)

@firqahnajiyah1

3 жыл бұрын

@@AbuLuLu313 you Shia

"Simple as this, leave it at that." `Aqeedah really isn't that hard. Philosophy is really a perfect label for what it is - love of speaking. It's too much. Allah is One and Completely Unique. What's there to talk about?

@mohammedhanif6780

9 жыл бұрын

Salaams bro! Aqidah is not hard - it is the explanation of aqidah ('ilm al kalam / theology) which is hard and cannot simply be dismissed. Most believers simply accept the aqidah for what it is at face value and do not need to go further. But other people are so constituted that their intellect forces them to search into these matters - theoogy is a medicine for them, and also a shield and sword against heretics and non-believers.

@tsgillespiejr

9 жыл бұрын

Mohammed Hanif Very true, but it can lead very quickly to absurdity as well. Depth of understanding is a must.

@mohammedhanif6780

9 жыл бұрын

standingunder do you have a Google Hangouts account?

@tsgillespiejr

9 жыл бұрын

Mohammed Hanif I do not.

The Paper can be found here: ia801006.us.archive.org/24/items/YasirQadhiDissertation/Yasir-Qadhi-dissertation.pdf

Assalaamu Alaikum... Why is it that I am not able to find this 100 page treatise? Has it been translated into English? Sharh Asma' Allah al-Husna (Commentary on Asma' Allah al-Husna); is this the title of the treatise? With Peace Sakinah 🌹 Allahu Hafaaz

There is only one clear verdict on this from Allah's Kalaam: Refer to Aayah 7 of Surah Aal e Imran: 03:07:= "It is He Who has revealed the Book to you. Some of its verses are absolutely clear and lucid, and these are the core of the Book. Others are ambiguous. Those in whose hearts there is perversity, always go about the part which is ambiguous, seeking mischief and seeking to arrive at its meaning arbitrarily, although none knows their true meaning except Allah. On the contrary, those firmly rooted in knowledge say: 'We believe in it; it is all from our Lord alone.' No one derives true admonition from anything except the men of understanding."

@xGen720

Жыл бұрын

this verse alone refutes most of ibn taymiyah points mentioned in this video.

@aformula4198

Жыл бұрын

@@xGen720 how?

@aformula4198

Жыл бұрын

@@xGen720 I think it supports Ibn taymiyyah's arguments

@xGen720

Жыл бұрын

@@aformula4198 because not all verses in quran are clear and lucid as claimed but some verses are ambiguous and none knows their true meaning except Allah.

@aformula4198

Жыл бұрын

@@xGen720 everyone agrees on that..how does that refute Ibn taymiyyah?

Where can I find a digital copy of Dr. Yasir Qadhi's dissertation?

@aymanfarid3552

3 жыл бұрын

Just google it it’s out there

For ibn Taymiyyah the All Ash ari school of thoughts is like christians ? So it means they like kafhir? They have also big imaams , just curious please answer me.

jajakallah

Allahu Akbar. How late am I. This was 6 years ago. Please come to Malaysia.

When did this talk take place?

I'm a big fan of yasir qadhi and ibn taymiyyah

The Problem which Muslim Ummah is facing today is that they dont respect if somebody disagrees with them , I m Shia Muslim , I myself read some of his work like Sharh Aqidatul Wastiya, I completely disagree with Ibn Taymiyyah thoughts , not only with him I also disagree with some thoughts of Shia Muslim scholar - Allamah Majlisi on Usool , but giving intellectual respect to some scholar is must , this is the same trend which i see when there is video about Imam Khomeini , instead of looking at his books like 40 Hadith , Discipline of Prayer etc , some people Misquote his book on some theological and Jurisprudential issue , i just said these words here becoz i saw comments below this Lecture in which ppl were sending somebody to Jannah and somebody to Hell , this attitude will make Islam a mockery ,which to some extent has happened , also followers of Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah should also know to respect other scholars whether he is Sufi like Ibn Arabi or Barelvi or Shia so that despite our strong differences with ibn Taymiyyah still we respect his beliefs and rational thoughts , Inshallah the differences in this Ummah will flourish and enrich the Islamic Civilisation based on the principle of Tawheed and Universal Brotherhood

@rabikhan589

3 жыл бұрын

@@googleuser-fo7td exactly

Shia are guilty of what they accuse others of Al Kafi is the most authentic Shia Hadeeth book We read H 21, Ch. 1, h 21 Al-Husayn ibn Muhammad has narrated from Mu‘alla ibn Muhammad from al-Washsha’ from alMuthanna al-Hannat from al-Qutayba al-A 'sha’ from ibn abu Ya‘fur from a slave of clan of Shayban from abu Ja‘far (a.s) who has said the following. "When al-Qa’im, (the one who will rise with Divine Authority) the guardian, of our family will appear from occultation, Allah will place His hand over the heads of His servants and, thus, He place their intelligence together and complete their understanding."

Further more if we do not use our Akaal and ponder over verses then you will find many contradictions. Surah Iklaas is in direct refutation of God having literal hands even if they are like nothing we can comprehend.

a truth teller

A stunning and succinct masterpiece ya shaikh.

Subahanallah. I wish the comments section was disabled. Ibn Taymiyya (rahimahullah) is a well respected scholar. And to see Muslims trying to use vulgar language and defame each other is so disheartening. May Allah guide us all to the straight path and accept our forgiveness and grant us Jannah. May Allah disgrace the people who disguise themselves as Muslims to create confusion and mischief. Ameen.

@celestialknight2339

6 жыл бұрын

Javid Ahmed Ameen

@sharps8726

6 жыл бұрын

To say God has a body belittles God and is scientifically impossible.

@remonation24

5 жыл бұрын

Ibn taymiyyah was nothing but a good for nothing bum who drowned in philosophy. He will burn in the deepest pits of hell along with Iblis, may Allah damn them both.

@seedysaid6588

4 жыл бұрын

They are abusing him and he is better than us

Asalam Alkeoum Jazak Allah Khair Shaikh, for everything you do, and I would like to request from you to addres an issue that is spreading a lot, which is "disrespect and disregarding scholars" I've Lived in many places around the world for long times, not just visiting and one of the big issues that I'm seeing, is many professionals that are muslims disregard scholars many saying the disaster of our Ummah is from the scholars others make jokes on some fatwas or mistakes ....etc. from current and past scholars (even the Ulamma of the sahaba, and the 4 imams of the mathahib) and many started making up fatwas that they think it's right and fits their brains (or desire) or from reading 10 or 20 random islamic books from here and there I know the scholars can make mistakes, and yes using our brain to know what is wright from what is wrong from what is said ..... but disrespecting and talking badly about past and current scholars is not the way of our deen. please can you focus a bit on this .... jazak Allah khair

MashaAllah Dr. Qadhi.

One argument I did not hear the sheikh address...And that is, unlike mutazila, philosipha, etc. who were changing core meanings, taking metaphorical understandings of certain texts, like gods names, does not change the core meaning of the islam. The same message is taken away from either approach. Big difference in that and mutazila isnt it? For example, Asharis say God cannot be on a throne, for it would assume, God is limited to time and space, therefore, it must be metaphorical. Asharis say, no God says he is on a throne, but it is unlike any throne we can comprehend. So essentially its really just a meaningless statement with no value, as they have no idea what the throne means. Therefore, the throne becomes metaphorical for them as well...What's the difference? Seems like semantics. At least with the Asharis, we can attempt to understand the text. The Atharis have no take away from the message. Secondly, I wish he would address the role of metaphor in text. Does Ibn Tamiyah deny the existence of that? If so, that is strange, as metaphor is used all the time in language in Arabic poetry is it not? And is he does agree on the use of metaphor, where and when is it used in the texts and how do we know when to use it? Thirdly, I wish he would have addressed the downside to literal interpretation of text. Namely its tendency to promote extremism and intolerance. Some text clearly contradict other text, without metaphorical understandings of some, how do you make sense of it all and reconcile it all together? Seems like you cant, and rather just ignore certain texts.

@mohammedhanif6780

8 жыл бұрын

good questions

Mufti qazi, one thing tht confuses me...if imam ghazali came up with this theory originally, why does IT give credit to imam ar razi and not to the original author? Jazaks.

@shihab2468

4 жыл бұрын

Because his book was more popular.

I would Ashairah to tell me what they think about the Arguments that ibn Taymiyyah RH brought. Did the changed any of your Opinions? No hate. Asking for educational purposes

@ithhoofol

2 жыл бұрын

Turn from the majority to a small minority,

@Hassan-hh6mu

2 жыл бұрын

I'm not ashari sufi deobandi shia rafodhi etc, but what ibn taymiyyah wrote about Allah Almighty I strongly disagree with and so should everyone else. "There is nothing in the book of Sunnah, nor in the statements of the Salaf, or Imams of the nation that He (Allah) is not a body and His features are not a body" Source: Bayan Talbis al-Jahamia, Volume 1, Page 101. God is also a beardless, curly haired, young man who rides on a mosquito: "We conclude that it was eyesight as it is in the Sahih narration from Qutada from Ikrama from Ibn Abbas who narrated that the Prophet said:'I saw my God in an image of a beardless (young man), with long curly hair in a green garden." Source: Al-Tasis fi al-rad ala Asas al-Taqdis byibn Taymiyya, Volume3, Page214. "He permits the possibility of His sitting on a mosquito's back" Source: Al-Beshara wa al-thaf Allamah by Hassan al-Saqqaf, Page 21. If He (God) wants, He can sit on a mosquito's back. Source: Bayan Talbis al-Jahamia by ibn Taymiyya, Volume 1, Page 568. Ibn Taimiyah cited this text from Sheikh al-Daremi and he wrote that he believed in it. Interestingly, there is a similar belief in Judaism, because they believe God rides on an angel. We read in the The Old Testament, Book of Samuel, 22:11 (King James version): "And he rode upon acherub, and did fly.: and he was seen upon the wings of the wind." Enough about your gods attributes, let's see what ways of transportation he uses to get to his intended destination: "Allah is able to relocate from here to there through rope" Source: Majmu'a al-Fatawa, Volume 2, Page 76.

"The ideas of Ibn Taymiyyah are worthless. He was misguided and misguiding Muslims. He deviated from the consensus of Muslims and took a heretical path. Islamic scholar stated in unanimity that he was a heretic. Kutbud-Bardiri wrote this in detail in his commentary on Mukhtasar." [Tahir Muhammad Sulayman - Zahiratul-fiqhil-Kubra]

I think it should be more simple and explained as he said Ibn Taymiah explained in 39:01 .

May Allah bless and prosper Dr Yasir Qadhi. Ameen.

does yasir qadhi mention ibn taymiya believed the world was always existing with Allah? Does he mention ibn taymiya mentioned this in at least 7 of his books? does he mention ibn taymiya went against the consensus of the scholars more than 50 times? does he mention ibn tamiya said Allah sits on the Arsh (!) and leaves a space on it for Prophet Muhammad? does he mention ibn taymiya was imprisoned 3 or 4 times and died in prison as a result of his heretical beliefs? or does he believe all the scholars conspired against him and were haters?

How did Ibn Taymiyyah reconcile the fact that on one hand he discredits aql as being subject to the individual(subjective) and time(culture, surroundings etc.), and on the other hand he appeals to it to accept his arguments? If it's invalid to begin with, then surely accepting his arguments is just as prone to be wrong. I find it fascinating that a lot of what he described against the rationalists(that they use difficult words and do the emperor-has-no-clothes thing) is happening now with the salafi atharis who do the exact same thing, but argue what he argued.

اتمنى ان ارى دروس الشيخ مترجمه للعربيه

@yahyajohnlorenzen4713

4 жыл бұрын

ايهاب الوصيفي لماذا؟ عندكم أحسن وأجمل باللغة العربية.

Fakhruddin razi rh used laysa kamithlihi shay verse before giving a meaning to mutashabihat verses and words like yad.. So the first meaning of yad is hand, this meaning is secondary and literal, the verse laysa kamithlihi shay takes precedence(1st) over hand(Literal yad)(2nd), hence another meaning is taken that does not resemble Allah to creation. Here all verses reg Allah is taken first before a meaning inc laysa kamithlihi shay! Any meaning that likens Allah to creation is rejected. Razi rh Yad - laysa kamithlihi shay(1st verse) - control(2nd) example Ibn taymiyyah used yad - hand, using reason(meaning) over revelation ie The verse laysa kamithlihi shay comes AFTER(2nd) according to this group and the meaning apparent/literal haqiqi hand is taken before(1st). Ibn taymi Yad - hand(1st meaning), laysa kamithlihi shay(2nd verse) So who used reason over revelation? Def not fakhruddin razi rh. Twisting words to support and fool people does not work for long. Falsehood can be covered with a word of truth, when the truth is unveiled falsehood is exposed. Verily falsehood by its nature is bound to perish.

@mohammedhanif6780

8 жыл бұрын

well said

Just reading the type of aggressive, arrogant and foul language in this comments section proves the point that most often 99.9% will not read the actual works in full and if made simplified by a youtube lecture 80% will not bother to grasp what is being said but all will indulge in blind hero worship or blind hatred and engage in a drunken war of self righteousness. Allah save us all ameen

07:00 claim fahradin 23:52 refute by ibn Taymiyyah (15:20 introduction)

@ridovercascade4551

2 жыл бұрын

27:20 refutation 40 points

@ridovercascade4551

2 жыл бұрын

29:48 short summary refute

Plz provide the pdf about Abdul Wahab ... That is necessary...

@nasirabdiwahid2942

2 жыл бұрын

Don’t watch him plz save Guard your Iman.

Which scholars of old referred to the Ashari's as Ahlul Sunnah? I don't mean in the broad sense, Sunni or Shia.

@razitube6010

3 жыл бұрын

@123455667 like everyone except ibn taymia

World record for name dropping his study at Yale University

what is akel and what is nakal?

@mohammedhanif6780

8 жыл бұрын

aqal = reason naqal = transmitted texts ie. the Quran and Hadith

@SultanOrhanGazi

5 жыл бұрын

@@mohammedhanif6780 Aqil is intellectual , brain , common sence ,

the part where he says "a daleel is not based on whether it is aql or naql but by the yaqeen reached by the aqil or naql due to the daleel's own merit" is a farce. It's word play. We know from the Imams of the salaf that one Imams daleel had no merit in the usul of another Imam. The debate has always been what is considered merit to whom. It's a fancy way of stating an obvious age-old fact the beginning seeker of knowledge even knows. It's just his way of saying "I already know I'm right and here's where I tell why i think so"

Abdullah Ibn Masud (may Allaah be pleased with him) reported that Allaah’s Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) said: “The last person to enter paradise will be a man who will alternately walk, stagger and be burnt by the Fire ... until his saying: “Then a third tree will be raised up at the gate of paradise, and it will be better than the first two. The man will say, “O My Lord, bring me closer to this [tree] so that I may enjoy its shade and drink its water, and I will not ask for anything more.” Allaah will say, “O son of Adam, did you not promise Me that you would not ask Me for anything more?” He will say, “Yes, O Lord, I will not ask you for anything more.” And his Lord, may He be glorified, will excuse him because he is seeing something which he has no patience to resist, so He will bring him closer. When he is brought close, he will hear the voices of the people of Paradise, and will say, “O my Lord, admit me to it.” Allaah will say, “O son of Adam what will bring an end to your requests to Me? Will it please you if I give you the world and as much again?” He will say, “O Lord, are You making fun of me when You are the Lord of the Worlds?”“ Ibn Mas`ud laughed and said, “Why do you not ask me why I am laughing?” They asked, “Why are you laughing?” He said, “Because the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) laughed”, so they (the companions) asked, “Why are you laughing, O Messenger of Allaah?” He said, “Because of the Laugh of the Lord of the Worlds when he [i.e. desirer of Paradise] said, “Are You making fun of me when You are the Lord of the Worlds?” He will say, “I am not making fun of you, but I am able to do whatever I will”“. [Sahih Muslim] There is clear evidence in this that Allaah is attributed with laughter, and that his laugh is real; we know this through the action of the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam), in which he laughed due to Allaah -the Mighty and Majestic- laughing. However, Allah’s laughter, though Haqeeqi, is not like creation’s laughter in its reality, and none knows how it is in reality except Allaah, the Mighty and Majestic. What is obligatory upon us is to believe and submit.

@ParvezKhan-py5ys

8 жыл бұрын

The Face of Allaah is one of Allaah’s Attributes which is true and real, just like all the other attributes that have been reported in the Book and the Sunnah. The exact nature of His Face, like all the other attributes is unknown, and in this regard the statement of Imaam Maalik constitutes the scales by which all of attributes are understood, "Istiwaa is known, but its modality (kaif) is unknown, having faith in it is obligatory and asking about it (i.e. about its true nature is an innovation". Then from the Sunnah, is the saying of the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam), "His Veil is made of light and if He was to uncover it, the splendors/radiances (subuhaat) of His Face, would destroy everything of His creation that His Sight would reach." [Muslim, from Abu Moosa al-Ash’aree] So it is clear from this that the Face, which is an Attribute of Allaah, also has attributes. Following hadith clearly proves that the Wajh of Allah is Haqiqee (Real). "I seek refuge in Allaah the Mighty (al-‘Adheem) and in His Noble Face and His Eternal Power for Shaytaan the Accursed" [Abu Dawood]. Concerning the interpretation that Face refers to His Essence (Dhaat). Then if it is meant by this that it refers to His Essence while at the same time affirming a Face for him, then this is acceptable. For Face is an attribute of His Essence and it is not something created or separate from Him. Hence, if everything will perish save His Face, then it is understood from this that His Dhaat will not perish either, it will remain and this is because Face is an Attribute of the Essence, not created and separate from it. However if it is meant that it refers to His Essence while at the same time denying the attribute of Face for Him, then this is falsehood as has been made clear from the above. Imaam Bukhaaree affirms, without doubt, the Attribute of Face, just as he brought narrations in affirmation of Hand, Eyes, Self (Nafs), His Speech, His being above the Throne and many of the other attributes that the Jahmiyyah denied.

@ParvezKhan-py5ys

8 жыл бұрын

do not behave like a jahmee who denied the Face of Allah as haqiqee (real attribute)

@ParvezKhan-py5ys

8 жыл бұрын

Regarding the statement of Allaah the Most High, For those who do good is the best (i.e. Paradise) and something more [that is better]?. (Yunus 10:26) Then the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wasallaam) said in explanation of this, "Looking at His Face, the Most High" (Muslim 1/163). Therefore, the one who denies the attribute of Face for Allaah then he is claiming that the Believers in Paradise will be looking at something imaginary, and in this he has made a great error and invented a great lie.

@ParvezKhan-py5ys

8 жыл бұрын

it is the ahlul kalam who think that God is physical body. its ironic that the founder of asharism was a mu'tazila No Athari Scholar has explained God in terms of Jism (body).

@ParvezKhan-py5ys

8 жыл бұрын

The scholars of Athari creed affirm life, knowledge, hearing, seeing, face, hands, eye(s) [in their meanings] for Allaah without giving resemblance to the creation

Fakhruddin ar-razi seems a real rational and intelligent man who didn’t want to be a sheep and believe anything

Just read one of his book called AQEEDATUL TADMURRIYYAH

Who determine what is correct in these school of thoughts when all of them create their own rules of what considered correct....

@52 regarding "conditional belief"...isn't this also the aqeedah of iblees?!... just saying

dr yasir qadhi raheemullah

Way to go Yasir Yadhi! I am sunni muslim ash'aru but your way explaining it from a ovjective way was awesome. ! BTW, I tend to stick away from these issues and stick to wajibat ;) But I do hope the salafi brothers understand how asharism is connected to sunni islam

Shaykh cud u please talk about the end times in detail like gog and magog as the sea of galilee is drying so doesnt that mean they've been released? And the universal fasaad in the world today that has never been like this in the history of mankind

@thebachu786

9 жыл бұрын

check out Sheikh Imran Hosein for that. Salaam

@kungfufreak360

9 жыл бұрын

I would not recommend imran hosein, he throws in his own opinions which are a tad nutty

@thebachu786

9 жыл бұрын

Infinite Knight "never accept my opinion until you are convinced that it is correct" sound familiar to you ?

@UnknownSend3r

6 жыл бұрын

Infinite Knight tad nutty ? Hes off his rocker, disrespectful and reckless. He’s a walking fitnah that’s obsessed with a bigger fitnah.

So yasir is a graduate of wahabiayyah as taught in that university outside of medina city.

Congratulation Mr. Qadhi!