Was never a penalty. Those who say it was would be fuming if that was given against us

@darrenporter1850

21 күн бұрын

Correct, as 50/50

@peterelsey6238

21 күн бұрын

Studs up no ball contact

@dexio8601

21 күн бұрын

Was it a foul? Forget penalty...

@peterelsey6238

21 күн бұрын

Get over it ffs 🤦‍♂️

@leonhughes9014

21 күн бұрын

110% a penalty. outside the box its given is a foul 100/100 times. Its close but Kane hits the ball first and then contact is made... I dont even get the fuss

It never a penalty, if that was given against England the whole country would of had a meltdown

@leonwilks4114

20 күн бұрын

@@jakeansell5408 fantastic comment have a great day at school you

@craigderby4416

20 күн бұрын

Ye and if the Dutch were the beneficiaries they would of screamed for the pen

@jc6087

20 күн бұрын

He jumped in, high and studs up. That's been a foul and red card since the 80's. You dont even have to make contact for it to be a penalty. We all saw Sol Campbell not touch Rooney but the pen was given for intent, none of you complained then?? Furthermore the Referee himself asked for the review which he is supposed to do.

@jc6087

20 күн бұрын

He jumped in, high and studs up. That's been a foul and red card since the 80's. You dont even have to make contact for it to be a penalty. We all saw Sol Campbell not touch Rooney but the pen was given for intent, none of you complained then?? Furthermore the Referee himself asked for the review which he is supposed to do.

@shortlifehacker567

20 күн бұрын

It was a pen stop crying lady's, and stop going on as if ref favour england, I didn't realize we been winning everything with england

Kane rolling around got the attention of VAR. He said himself right aftef the game his leg was hanging off.....however it wasnt hanging off 2 minutes later when he jumped up to put the penalty away.

@Rycerz49

21 күн бұрын

I’ve gotten to a point ow where I’m struggling to even watch a game. It’s pathetic.

@joelp9486

21 күн бұрын

Those boots have no protection for the top of the foot and Dumphries came in with the studs up. He kicked right into the bottom of Dumphries boots and possibly into a stud. It probably hurt like hell. Not saying it was a penalty but it most likely really hurt. You ever crash on a bike or a skateboard and hit a part of your body real hard? It hurts when it happens but you walk it off and move along. You're not injured but it does hurt. I really don't think that Kane was faking that it was painful. Still don't think it was a penalty unless the problem is that Dumphries' studs were up.

@JG-us9lu

21 күн бұрын

​@joelp9486 Nonsense Kane kick him and went down like the girl he is.

@andrewward1425

21 күн бұрын

@joelp9486 I still think he was milking it tbh. Kane although a proven goalscorer has also made a career of falling over the second a defender makes any contact especially with his back to goal. Sign of the times though he isn't the only one that tries to gain an advantage. How would VAR have looked at it had Dumfries rolled around the same way? I just shake my head at the way football gets played now

@JG-us9lu

21 күн бұрын

@@andrewward1425 Spot on

Never a penalty in a million years sorry

@DavidLawlor-ci8wz

20 күн бұрын

Not a foul , Gareth should change name to Jose. Maradona was a genius when England get a bit of luck , Kane was lucky.

@shortlifehacker567

20 күн бұрын

Yes it was that's why it was awarded, stop crying lady's

@nathanunsted142

20 күн бұрын

@shortlifehacker567 so if that was a Dutch pen you wouldn't complain?

@shortlifehacker567

20 күн бұрын

@@nathanunsted142 nope I'm not a baby. Pen is a pen.

I didn't think it was a penalty; I thought Kane hit the ball before following on the defender!

Never a penalty that. You'd be fuming is that is given against you

@herbert9241

21 күн бұрын

Not a bit, Nate - I'm not that petty and feeble. Neither do I care for Southgate's tedious methods being vindicated - but I do like to see the game played and officiated fairly. It's a pen.

@shortlifehacker567

20 күн бұрын

Never a pen? That's why they awarded it? That's why defender had studs in kane foot? That's why he only made contact with Kane? Stop crying lady's on the internet

@renwynmedina1057

20 күн бұрын

SAKA hands the ball 5 seconds b4 the clash between Kane and Dumfriess so no penalty

This is quite stunning if you think about it because Gallagher was a top class referee and he is unbelievably saying that the rules of the game should be different if you are in a penalty area - yet where is there a rule that says that? - personally I still can’t believe it was a penalty and given how most referees are allowing to keep the game flowing I don’t even think it would have been a foul outside either - bloke is a knob and tbf if it happened at the other end we would still be talking about it at the next Euros - I feel the Dutch were hard done by

@registeredmental

20 күн бұрын

celtic fringe by any chance?

@dirtydawg448

20 күн бұрын

@@registeredmental no I’m English - my Dad was a cockney ffs - but he brought me up to be fair and honest - if that decision had been against England and we had lost I would be absolutely fuming but here is the thing - so would loads of the same people who are saying now that it was a penalty - and you know that’s true too!

Zero integrity in football. Across the board. From fans , players… everything. “Doesn’t matter, we got a penalty “… sums up my feelings on this ridiculous sport.

I want England to win, but that was not a penalty

@shortlifehacker567

20 күн бұрын

You clearly dont

If that was anywhere else on the field it would be a freekick and yellow card, fair play he's gone to block the shot but he had his studs showing and it was a late challenge so id say 50/50 its rather giving or not but need to take into consideration the fact the ref would have blew for a freekick anywhere else.

@user-bi4bb6cd9s

21 күн бұрын

How could he have possibly defended the shot without his studs showing?!

@PAB86

21 күн бұрын

@@user-bi4bb6cd9s a few ways if you know how to play football

@herbert9241

21 күн бұрын

@@user-bi4bb6cd9s - That's his problem. That his options were limited in the split-second is no mitigation for a foul. Maybe Harry Kane should have waited until Dumfries had steadied himself, aye?

@YayaTourney

20 күн бұрын

Yet you all call the likes of Messi and Ronaldo goats when they obviously play this easier version of association football where defenders are just allowed to be cones.

@user-bi4bb6cd9s

20 күн бұрын

@@herbert9241 Yo do realize that Kane was able to shoot and they both clashed *afterwards* with the follow through of their individual actions

Imagine if this was the other omg you wouldnt hear the last of it they still talking about the hand of god

@bigceazer

21 күн бұрын

yep only when it goes in their favour.

@IWTBF

21 күн бұрын

100%

@leonwilks4114

21 күн бұрын

Omg ffs grow a pair

@Bert-lw1ot

21 күн бұрын

“Was it a penalty?” “No” What more do you want?🤡🤡🤡

@jamjam2833

21 күн бұрын

Cry

These ex refs are so full of it. You not allowed to block a shot with studs up period... whether Kane was shooting or (a scenario of) Dumphries slid into Kane studs up.

@m0o0n0i0r

21 күн бұрын

yes someone should tell them the rules have changed since they were a ref and they need to look at the rule book

@herbert9241

21 күн бұрын

@@m0o0n0i0r - It's not even a new rule, mate. It's just all these ex-pro bluffers propagating the received opinion that it was harder in their day.

@taykitrleevitt4314

21 күн бұрын

If the only option is for the Dutch to head the ball away, then Kane's foot would have kicked the Dutch player's head, getting him sent off for dangerous play.

@herbert9241

21 күн бұрын

@@taykitrleevitt4314 - If my aunt had a bicycle she'd be a fish. That's not Kane's problem.

@m0o0n0i0r

20 күн бұрын

@@herbert9241 so true

VAR should NOT be active in the game. VAR should only get involved if the ref hasn't seen a red card incident. It should be used if the referee requests it.

@craigratio

20 күн бұрын

Red cards, off the ball incidents and offsides are all fine but when VAR is being imposed on the game for soft soft penalties the games kinda gone.

Well the penalty - Rules set by the International Football Association Board (IFAB) The rule states: “It is committed with an opponent nearby and prevents the opponent from playing the ball for fear of injury. “Playing in a dangerous manner involves no physical contact between the players. If there is physical contact, the action becomes an offence punishable with a direct free kick or PENALTY KICK.” “In the case of physical contact, the referee should carefully consider the high probability that misconduct has also been committed.” .....don't hate the player hate the game lol

@Fcker-oi8ex

21 күн бұрын

Kane did play the ball though

@acchery8910

21 күн бұрын

So given the rules that you stated out. The defensive player put his leg out to block a shot. His foot did not go towards the attacker. It was at arm's length and only hit on the follow-through of the attacker. The attacker shot the ball. The ball then went out of play and on the follow-through hit the defender who was a safe distance away and no misconduct was made. Given the rules, this was not a penalty. The on field decision was no penalty and should not have been called to VAR in the first place because there was no clear and obvious error to overturn it. In fact, upon review, they should have seen that Saka hand move the bowl in the direction of Kane.

@courtneygardner64

21 күн бұрын

This guy is definitely a fed

@user-xh4bw2zc4g

21 күн бұрын

​@@acchery8910nice mental gymnastics. The guy is a distraction and effects kanes follow through before the shot is taken and that's because he's going to make contact with studs...this has a major impact on his shot placement which is obvious when he hits it and hen makes contact with raidlsed studs.

@acchery8910

21 күн бұрын

@@user-xh4bw2zc4g I'm confused. A defender is supposed to make a attacking player 's day difficult. There's no problem there. The problem is I did he have any misconduct? Clear-cut? Dumfries didn't move his foot towards Kane on the shot proven because Kane got his shot off. He is in front of Kane and his only option to stop a shot is to put a foot up. With something as subjective as a follow-through that should not be taken into account because different players have different techniques. That is a coming together as it would usually be called in different circumstances. It has happened before. Ask anyone who has actually played football. This is not a penalty. There's no mental gymnastics, simple facts. Former players, pundits, referee analyst, and coaches have said the same. You didn't offer any argument to say it was a foul, you said was that he made it difficult for Kane which is his job.

I am not surprised one bit that Dermot Gallagher is taking this stance... I think for him the only exception would be if it was for Man UTD at old Trafford

@ikeaub

21 күн бұрын

Shut up. Leave my Man Utd out of this.

@catpuglar7220

21 күн бұрын

Stop sniffing glue

@georgesalano5771

21 күн бұрын

@leeerarp4918... trying to discredit the man coz he is saying what you don't want to hear, that it was daylight robbery.... not a penalty on any day,anytime.....

@catpuglar7220

21 күн бұрын

@@georgesalano5771 🤣🤣🤣🤣

I didn't think its a penalty, But what is annoying is. A referee says its a free kick outside of the box, but doesn't give it inside the box because its a penalty. There is the problem for me, consistency . Referees saying the laws are interpreted where they happen on the pitch.

If that had happened at midfield it would be called. Yes, penalty

@nate0116

21 күн бұрын

your view would be different if it happened in the opposite box

@simongray9530

21 күн бұрын

What a stupid comment​@@nate0116

@MrMramirez86

21 күн бұрын

Not a penalty, Kane kicked him after kicking the ball not the other way

@simongray9530

21 күн бұрын

@@MrMramirez86 his studs were showing. You are not allowed to show your studs in a tackle. If you do, you committed a foul.

@simongray9530

21 күн бұрын

It's not rocket science

Dermot was a waste of time as referee and now he’s proving why.

@nate0116

21 күн бұрын

you certainly would have a different view if this was against you

@gmtime5439

21 күн бұрын

@@nate0116 it’s got nothing to do with me and no I wouldn’t. Dumfries went in studs up, high, didn’t touch the ball and struck another player. If Dumfries hadn’t put his foot there Kane may have reacted differently to hitting the ball and might have actually scored. If that had been an outside the box decision it would have been a certain foul and you know it. However, we can’t allow subjective refereeing to creep in. For a start the refs have too much to deal with and they can’t process enough information to constantly be weighing up the ‘what if’s’ of every situation in a game. It’s kind of why VAR was implemented. And in this case VAR saw something in the challenge. Like it or not, it was a simple decision in direct compliance with the rules as they currently stand.

@graemeroberts7367

21 күн бұрын

😂 😂 😂 😂 so was maradonas hand of god then

@gmtime5439

21 күн бұрын

@@graemeroberts7367 well you win the award for dumbest comment on the internet today don’t you. Maradonna literally hand balled, but that wasn’t the purpose of your silliness was it? You just like aggro on the internet don’t you? 😂 you probably have a dick the size of acorn 😂😂

Anyone with a modicum of football knowledge knows that this was never ever a penalty. How that ever went to VAR is beyond me and it takes the shine off any team winning a match. It’s tainted and if England win this tournament it will always stand that they should never have been given a penalty.

@David-be7jn

21 күн бұрын

Hopefully Spain win and all this is forgotten

@herbert9241

21 күн бұрын

And anyone with a rather more comprehensive knowledge of football knows it was a penalty.

@dademags77

21 күн бұрын

@@herbert9241 You obviously don’t have that much then.

@herbert9241

21 күн бұрын

@@dademags77 - Yeah, because it clearly was a penalty and I don't know it. Stop embarrassing yourself, lad, you're literally jealously defending your weakness with 'NER-NER-NER-NER.'

@shortlifehacker567

20 күн бұрын

You clearly have no knowledge or you would know it was a clear pen and a reckless challenge with high boot studs in kane's foot, no contact on the ball, in the box, clear pen, stop crying lady's

Er studs showing while someone is attempting to strike the ball and the studs are in the path of the players foot when he strikes the ball, its a foul outside the box all day so its a pen. All these people saying it isnt a pen that is a free kick anywhere else on the pitch you cant go into a tackle with studs showing when someone is striking the ball. Ive seen this happen in open play plenty of time in the Prem and the player it happens to the team he is on go ballistic and there is always a big kickoff...

Kanes injury looked so severe after the challenge, I'm surprised he was allowed to take the penalty.

When we used to play decades ago when we were likely to kick the studs of the opposition player we used to pull back the foot after hitting the ball to avoid contact. Never mind in those days we had leather boots which gave the foot protection rather than the slippers of today and which cost £5:99.

Is Dermot speaking as a referee or an Irishman?

@jakeansell5408

21 күн бұрын

Both are delusional refs and especially the Irish and I've got Irish in me sadly so I can say that

@Alien_Observer_

21 күн бұрын

@@jakeansell5408 Sadly?

Did the ball cross the line the Russian linesman said it did England World Cup winners 1966😂

Dermot thinking about the "obvious ramifications" before giving a penalty !?!?!?!?! Everything that is wrong with the game . A foul is a foul .

it's bad enough that the Prem league has such 2nd rate ref's but to have such shite ref for a tournament

VAR a weapon to dictate the outcome of games

It seems to me that whichever player goes down injured wins the foul in these situations. Look at the Anthony Gordon/Calvin Phillips penalty in the Newcastle v West Ham game last season. Same scenario in reverse: Phillips attempts to clear a ball, Gordon sneaks in with a block, and Phillips catches Gordon's studs with his follow through. But because it was Gordon who went down injured the foul went against Phillips.

If it's a foul outside the box then it's a foul inside the box.

Nice to seeing the English objectively looking at this decision as a dutchie. I think there were more odd moments not in our favor like: handball saka in the build up to that penalty, judo tackle by rice on ake in English box, yellow for van dijk when being correct and speaking to ref as a captain, and of course how the Dutch attack was cancelled by the ref unfairly (Gakpo taking the ball from Mainoo) and thereby allowing the English to set up the match deciding attack. I guess it’s just bad luck

Clear penalty. He can't block or clear the ball with his studs. Dangerous play

@alansmith4655

21 күн бұрын

His studs weren't even pointing at Kane. Kane went into him. It was a daft decision.

@shortlifehacker567

20 күн бұрын

Studs went in Kane's foot, reckless late challenge by defender, high boots studs going in one direction, no contact on the ball, CLEAR pen, stop crying lady's

@renwynmedina1057

20 күн бұрын

SAKA hands the ball 5 seconds b4 the clash between Kane and Dumfriess so no penalty

@bennyssen5821

8 күн бұрын

Saka hand ball - free kick so o penalty

A foul is a foul, doesn't matter where on the pitch it is. Good grief.

Couldn't agree with Gallagher more. Was never a penalty.

Was clearly offside, you are all mad.

This just sums us up as a nation we cant just accept it and get ready for the final we have to go over and over a decision that went our way for once

Its unbelievable the amount of people that watch football an yet dont know the rule 😂😅 you can not, i repeat, you can not show your studs in a tackle. Its an immediate foul, especially in the box. Its been rule 1 since day dot

@dirtydawg448

21 күн бұрын

That is not the point though is it - the point is did he kick Kane or did Kane kick him on the follow through - I think it’s you who needs to read the rules as the defender was clearly not attempting I repeat not attempting (Just to help you as everyone else only needs to be told once) to tackle Kane but to block the shot - the contact was caused by Kane

@WillCamx

21 күн бұрын

It wasn't a tackle. His studs weren't pointing towards Kane. Kane kicked him, not the other way around.

@mancsy3262

21 күн бұрын

@@WillCamx he went for the ball, but kane had kicked the ball first and instead his stoods followed thru to his foot. Stone wall pen.

@mancsy3262

21 күн бұрын

@@WillCamx they both went for the ball, kane won and defender fouled. Simple

@Unpopular_Truth

21 күн бұрын

@@dirtydawg448 By your logic a player can just stick his foot, studs up, in front of a players leg when they are about to kick the ball to cause injury, but because the kicking players leg makes contact with the other player studs it is not a foul. Quite clearly this is ridiculous and rules are there to stop dangerous play otherwise players would be getting seriously injured every week.

I hope Spain will get the same call to even things out 👍

@jamjam2833

21 күн бұрын

Grow up kid

If that happens anywhere else on the pitch, the ref gives a foul. The refs don't call it in the box because they know it will mostly likely result in a goal, which is why they dont give them. They either change the rules or everyone should just suck it up and be quiet

The fool on the phone is wrong. The rules clearly state going into a tackle with raised studs means the player in not in control and can result a red card. If this was not a foul, every player could leave their foot hanging, studs showing. The rules say nothing about "inside the penalty area means different".

Never mind how many times we had bad decisions

The penalty area is part of the pitch.

Harry was not touched by Dumfries. He playacted and got his way.

There's a new professional foul that is hard to spot because it is done with the knee and not the foot. It happened many times during the Euros and it meant Scotland were denied a penalty.

The "clear and obvious error" bit has to be taken out.

Very strange that a tackle with studs up is not a foul. When outside the box raising your foot when a player kicks the ball is always a foul not even studs up, and sometimes a yellow card! How can it not be an obvious mistake when he didn’t see it- if he had seen it he would have booked him as he did with the replay!

I will start by saying I don't think it was a penalty but, it was clearly thought by VAR that the position of the defender's boot was reckless and indeed, refs give fouls there outside of the area regularly. I think maybe there needs a clarification. It is not good enough for Gallagher to say it is fine for it to be a foul outside but not inside the area. That is not satisfying. I didn't think the Germany pen against Denmark was a penalty in terms of it didn't feel like one, but I understand why it was according the the laws of the game.

It was a 50/50 accident. If that's a penalty then if it happened in the opposite penalty box he would have given it too Holland!! And that's ludicrous! 🙁

A foul in the penalty area is a penalty. The Dutchman went in studs showing

Some second before saka take the ball with hands one you can accept but second hands its free kick.

How on earth can a referee say that decision is made on the ramifications of were technically a foul is committed that because it would be a penalty it shouldn’t be given but on halfway line it would

I don't get the argument being made. How can it be a foul anywhere else on the pitch but not a foul in the box? Dumfries came down with a stamping motion with his studs angled down in a way that could have severely injured a player. He did not mean any harm but fouls aren't given based on intent.

Never a penalty in million years hope doesn’t come back bite us Sunday night

Agreed with the caller

When the ref doesn't give it, it goes for review, and then he gets called over-it's always going to be a penalty. As soon as this situation happens, the VAR team engages in sub-conscious coercion to the referee to convince him to award a different decision. No doubt the types of players involved will certainly influence the decision as well - i.e. would the same award have been given if it had been Trippier and not Kane? Like Dermot said, never a penalty. The very easy lotto draw keeps rolling for England, both for games played and decisions given.

A definite penalty. If it was against England, it shouldn’t have stood.

@renwynmedina1057

20 күн бұрын

SAKA hands the ball 5 seconds b4 the clash between Kane and Dumfriess so no penalty

It is a pen, but the process to give it was pretty dubious as it's certainly not a clear and obvious error from the ref on field

Doku on Mac Allister was GBH compared to this

@jamjam2833

21 күн бұрын

Never a pen

No doubt if this was a PGMOL referee in the PL, Dermot would say this is the right decision and VAR was correct to intervene. I do think it's a penalty, the striker getting a shot away is irrelevant, Dumfries caught Kane on the foot and was nowhere near the ball.

Curiously no one is talking about the double handball from Saka in the lead-up to it. If VAR reviewed it they conveniently neglected that part of the footage. Football is now rife with match fixing.

By saying this was not a penalty you're applying selective criteria of the incident. Free kicks are given for this type of challenge all over the pitch, the rules are if it happens in the box a penalty is awarded. If we start being selective about awarding a free kick where would it end. The challenge was high nowhere near the ball and studs up.

with or without VAR, it was clearly not a penalty. it was just a block shot. if the defender play acting and fall down, probably will change the outcome

Sorry if it is a free kick outside the penalty area then it should be a penalty inside the area. Saying that if a similar incident happenes on the halfway line it does not matter as much is cowardice. The rules are the same inside or outside the area.

Did the ref have a little bet on the result

Many decisions are subjective in football! I understand why lots of people say we (England), were lucky to be given it……….all I will say is I have seen a MULTITUDE of penalties given in the premier league where there has been FAR less contact!

Anyone who's ever played the game should know that this was never a penalty in a month of Sundays - another horrendous decision. It's almost as if any contact is now deemed to be a foul.

The issue wasn’t VAR, the referee was the one who made the mistake. He didn’t have the courage of his convictions to stick by his original on field decision. The referee was weak. However, the fact this is a subjective decision means the penalty shouldn’t have been given because nobody can quite agree on it

I am Dutch and even though I'm not an expert, I would not have allowed the free kick. England got lucky and sorry guys, but I'm rooting for Espana on Sunday!

I would ask Dermot to put his honest head on and ask himself if during a premier league match James Tarkowski performs that challenge on a City player at the Etihad would he or any other ref still say nothing to answer here? it's a fine challenge. I would say any team in the relegation battle playing one of the top four know fully well they are going to get some sort of issue raising their studs like that to a forward. A Wolves or Everton doing what Netherlands did would be looking at a possible sending off for the defender or a pen, maybe both.

It was never a free kick, never mind a penalty. Again, if that was given against your own team, you would still be angry in 50 years!

The thing that irks me more than the obviously stupid penalty decision is the feigning injury!! Rolling about like they’ve been shot only to get up and carry on!! They should be sent off for unsportsmanlike behaviour!!

Obviously a penalty! Studs up (which you can't do). Dumfries foot moved towards Kane's foot. Kane got there first, and was entitle to take a shot without taking a massive studs up challenge on this foot. Very dangerous play.

@nate0116

21 күн бұрын

surely your view would change if this penalty was awarded in the other box. You would've been fuming

@zkwz1

21 күн бұрын

If the ball is above the knee, how do you challenge without studs showing. Lol.

@kadiummusic

21 күн бұрын

They both did EXACTLY the same thing, went for the ball! Ludicrous decision.

@David-be7jn

21 күн бұрын

Ur deluded u fool

@herbert9241

21 күн бұрын

@@kadiummusic - Not at all, only one had studs-up. Hence the foul. It's not even a new rule.

Not English nor an England fan here. But having your studs facing up in a challenge means you're increasing the likelihood of getting a penalty call against you. Can't complain too much if you are punished by a penalty decision.

@user-nt7zo9er5t

21 күн бұрын

Studs were not facing Kane

@m0o0n0i0r

21 күн бұрын

@@user-nt7zo9er5t like Nanis red card vs real madrid?

@shortlifehacker567

20 күн бұрын

​@@user-nt7zo9er5tno absolutely no contact, on Kane? He was reckless end of, pen awarded, yayyy 🎉🎉🎉🎉

@shortlifehacker567

20 күн бұрын

@@Iron-Bridge his stud went for Kane, clear pen

That would have been a foul anywhere else on the pitch. Therefore it was a penalty

Did the german police catch the sniper who shot harry kane the way he was rolling about i dont no how he survived

Don't matter now we won get over it ❤❤❤

Best outcome would of been a Kane injury. Shane we got the pen instead

It was harsh but we were by far the better team

I’ve noticed English players like Kane, Foden etc flop around and dive around more than most other players nowadays. Kane especially, always screaming if he gets touched at all and rolling around on the ground like a fish

Studs high, late. Caught Kane. Anywhere else on the pitch it was a foul.

One of the worst penalty decisions ive ever seen.

If it should have been a free kick if the tackle had been outside the penalty area, then it has to be a penalty inside. You just ruined your own “it wasn’t a penalty” argument. I didn’t initially think it was a penalty but the defender left his studs in and Kane could have broken a bone so yes, it was fair enough to give a penalty.

Truth be told on balance of play england were the better team slightly and deserved to go through, but we can't hide from the fact that it was never a penalty.......God forbid if it had been the other way round,the narrative would have changed to....' ooh the decision swayed the trajectory of the game'.....'ooh this referee had match fixing case and his incident with Bellingham '....we would now be fed with stories of how uefa conspired blah....blah....blah....All in all best team won and let's hope for an entertaining final from the two great teams.

has everyone forgotten the rules of football??? its a penalty...its a foul anywhere else on the pitch. just because most refs don't give it doesn't mean its a bad decision.

If anything Kane kicked him 😂😂 Kane chancing it bcos his shot was 30ft over the bar

Never a pen in a million year's, but no point complaining about it. Its done and we are, somehow, in the final 😅😅

never a penalty in a million years but at last England get one where we have always been on receiving end of rubbish reffing (see Qatar qtr final where ref let France kick us to bits)

We see fouls given all the time where a player aint even bin touched. So its definitely a foul but because its leads to a penalty we look at it differently

You guys go to bed. Past is past and gone for good. Stop living in the past.

Kane kicked Dumfries! Never a penalty in a million years. Maybe Kane's oscar acting had an impact!

The referee has got a history on match fixing and I wouldnt be surprised if the referee on the England v Denmark euro semi final was aswell

@jamjam2833

21 күн бұрын

Ref never gave it ffs!!! Did u watch the game?

It was a penalty all day long you Anglophobes 😂🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿⚽️💪🏻

Who kicked who that is the line to follow. It's rigged for England to go through.

@kevinjackson6387

21 күн бұрын

Rigged 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂,

@jamjam2833

21 күн бұрын

What would have happened if we hadn’t scored a last minute goal v Slovakia then? Pathetic comment😂

@kevinjackson6387

20 күн бұрын

@@jamjam2833 so many haters on here mate ,it really hurts them that we got to a final ,even if we win it they will still slag them off .and do the same to the next manager who ever that is ,don’t know why they don’t support the jocks they would have more than enough to moan about with them

Against slovakia throw leading to goal with whole feet behind the line. Against holland saka handball lead to fake penno and at the end..holland should have corner two minutes before watkins goal...1966 vibes.

1966 you guys won on cheat and this time too

@peterelsey6238

21 күн бұрын

😂😂😂salty r we😂😂😂 u German??

@jamjam2833

21 күн бұрын

Stop moaning Hans

Clearly not a pen

@shortlifehacker567

20 күн бұрын

Correction, clear pen l, that's why it was awarded by the officials, high boot, studs going to kanes foot, defender made NO contact with ball only Kane, late challenge very reckless,inside the box, pen all day🎉🎉🎉🎉

Referree was biast to England was never a peno and bellingham on a yellow kicking ball away should have been sent off...but hopefully it comes around in the final

Saka goal onside

what about trailing foot penalties.. they are give.. According to law, it is a pen

Gallagher is a shite ref himself lbh

Never a penalty was accidental. However find it more concerning and disgusting Dermot admits the refs deliberately dont apply the rules because of the consequences. So not corrupt, just incompetant. Why should they keep their jobs?