*live action Ratatouille starring Gordon Ramsay*

@peterpepa3041

5 жыл бұрын

*WHY IS THERE A FUCKING MOUSE IN THE FUCKING KITCHEN YOU FUCKING PILLOCKS!*

@BenJPics9925

5 жыл бұрын

Actually, I would pay to see that. XD

@calebproductions1264

5 жыл бұрын

As much as we hate live action Disney remakes, having a live action Ratatouille remake with Gordon Ramsay the Big Blue Engine, Chef Mike, and Nino will make us happy and Disney will make a lot of money for doing this. They can even make a brand for Nino’s lamb sauce, now who the fuck wouldn’t want that?

@galactimura3402

5 жыл бұрын

I'm fucking c h o k i n g YES

@Spyrika

5 жыл бұрын

@@calebproductions1264 Did someone say NINOOOOOO?

Walt Disney once said “We don’t make movies to make money, we make money to make movies.” Oh, how Disney has completely thrown THAT out the window!

@thunderbird1921

4 жыл бұрын

The only reason you should do a remake at all is to tell the story from a different angle. Joker did this remarkably, as well as Christopher Nolan's Batman Trilogy.

@imperfect_dan7519

4 жыл бұрын

@@thunderbird1921 exactly

@redpanda6497

4 жыл бұрын

He ( *his company ) became what he swore to destroy.

@osakarain8284

4 жыл бұрын

Walt Disney was also a racist and reported communists to the CIA to be murdered. Guess Disney should get back to their roots and do that by your logic

@CHRB-nn6qp

4 жыл бұрын

@@osakarain8284 you do understand how flawed your logic is. Walt Disney made animated movies for his passion of animation, not to promote any racist or anti-communist ideals

They're not even kids movies anymore. As a kid I hated live action movies, I thought they were so boring. Cartoons are so much nicer to look at, even regular cgi. But when you make your movie look like the animal channel...no kids wanna watch that.

@blueblue-w-

4 жыл бұрын

I grew up on live action and cartoon shows and movies so it doesnt really bother me as much.

@thunderbird1921

4 жыл бұрын

I loved both as a kid, some were exceptionally well done (see The Chronicles of Narnia). These are not creative, most are lame copies of the animated originals with little fresh storytelling.

@tanner201x8

4 жыл бұрын

Lady Galeophie Well... animal channel is great

@mikek4610

4 жыл бұрын

Lady Galeophie the live action arent made for the kids...theyre made for the parents

@Chloe4656.

4 жыл бұрын

Yep

I swear to god if they make a toy story live action remake I'm done with life.

@BlueSky......

4 жыл бұрын

...with the exact same look

@shinysoda6

4 жыл бұрын

DONT GIVE THEM IDEAS!

@yxorPnwoknU

4 жыл бұрын

Some no life loser. Well say goodbye to life because I’m from 2022 and they already did it

@michelkhairallah2788

4 жыл бұрын

Really?😉😉

@advancedhell42069

4 жыл бұрын

They already did...

Simba: What's that shadowy place? Mufasa: That's the 2019 remake. You must never go there Simba.

@PeterGriffin11

5 жыл бұрын

Too late...

@gottesurteil3201

5 жыл бұрын

The live action Lion King is what the characters look like after drinking too much rhino milk.

@adlervomnorden7571

5 жыл бұрын

Oh he did :(; And he became that 2:12

*Old animated movie exists* Disney: it’s free real estate.

@alanhiding1471

5 жыл бұрын

Its just good business

@SpectrumAssociates

5 жыл бұрын

Bambi

@Rainygirl3100

5 жыл бұрын

They made a live action Pete's Dragon, so I fully expect a remake of Black Cauldron

@olivius8891

5 жыл бұрын

Thank you big smoke, very cool.

@thenotsodemocraticrepublic7731

5 жыл бұрын

There are 420 likes on this comment nobody ruin this

What they should do is put the originals back in theatres. I would definitely pay to watch Disney classics on a big screen.

@artbytesia

4 жыл бұрын

@A sad, strange little man Me too. Thank our Heavenly Father for Mary Poppins Returns and The New Adventures of Lassie!

@adityas3587

4 жыл бұрын

Same!

@para-yw9dn

4 жыл бұрын

smart

@thunderbird1921

4 жыл бұрын

They used to do that, actually. Snow White from what I've read was given a limited time back in theaters for it's 50th Anniversary. Nowadays, it's all about cash grabs though.

@adityas3587

4 жыл бұрын

@@thunderbird1921 wish they still did that :(

And now the "Live action" Lion King has made more money in the box office than any animated movie in history. _This truly is the darkest timeline..._

@avenger115x

4 жыл бұрын

@proud hufflepuff that's true tbh

@thefatbearcrew

4 жыл бұрын

Too bad the main 2 are ugly now

@joeyjerry1586

4 жыл бұрын

Dequan Milete, great, just great. Proof Disney makes these for money.

@NuggetOG

4 жыл бұрын

well tbh, disney is now larger and adults who watched it would probaly watch it with their children. and for some reason cgi makes more cash then animated. animated > cgi/live action

@channel4ripoffcompany404

3 жыл бұрын

Nice Community reference!

When you run out of ideas so you make HD versions of your ideas

@imapigeonyoupeasant1489

5 жыл бұрын

Tbh i enjoy them

@fyrflyr2378

5 жыл бұрын

Ironically this also applies to Kingdom Hearts.

@DanBonRP

5 жыл бұрын

@@fyrflyr2378 that is the point of kingdom hearts dumb ass

@MetalSonic420

5 жыл бұрын

How I feel about Disney right now.

@KDogwithtjack

5 жыл бұрын

The only one I'm excited for is The Lion King simply because it's my favorite Disney movie

Disney: Am I going to defile this grave to get money? Disney: of course I am!

@bloodstoneore4630

5 жыл бұрын

Better make sure finding the original is near impossible!

@shotgun64x

5 жыл бұрын

- Eugene Krabs.

@Sam-tf7jk

5 жыл бұрын

@Rip Stephen Hillenburg ur doing the exact same thing except for likes you dick

@ryansmith3448

5 жыл бұрын

You're Walter White

@mrgreytea2598

5 жыл бұрын

I think the ending of the episode also applies to Disney."Didn't you hear? We found an old warehouse full of them, they're worthless!"

I remember crying so hard when I watched the animated Lion King and I was so afraid to watch the remake because I would cry the same way. I was so bored and walked out feeling fine - there was no emotional connection. I get more emotional connection from narrated lion documentaries than I did with the Lion King remake lol

@robin3746

4 жыл бұрын

Because none of the characters expressed any emotion, so neither did you.

@therealrishon3227

4 жыл бұрын

I mean even though mufasa was played by the same actor he wasn’t doing to well, I think he was just bored

@Matt_6781

4 жыл бұрын

-_-

@legotwoface

4 жыл бұрын

When I saw the live-action Lion King I cried... Because I wasted my money 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 Soo SAD

@katiewoods2146

4 жыл бұрын

I saw a clip of the Mufasa dying scene in the live action one and laughed. My cat has hit me more violently than Scar hit Mufasa. It looked like a minor cat spat.

Everyone: Why did you decide to remake these classic disney movies? Disney: *money!*

@Jasmine-xb1ws

5 жыл бұрын

Blitzy BringsTheHorror they also are trying to (for the ones from different culture) make them better to make a more accurate show the culture

@Jasmine-xb1ws

5 жыл бұрын

Slade Racer yes money is apart of it but they’re also trying to make movies like Mulan more respectful and accurate to the culture

@colbbot3291

5 жыл бұрын

Mr Krabs: "Hello I like money!" 💵 Disney: "Me too!"

@artbytesia

4 жыл бұрын

@@Jasmine-xb1ws But they never needed to! Nobody cared if the older movies showed the culture the right way or whatever; they just cared about the characters and the stories!

@uainjansun

4 жыл бұрын

@@colbbot3291 apple: hey boys I have some money so we could eat *All three eat their money*

I seriously miss 2D animation. There’s so much more magic behind it. I know when I was a child, I was inspired by the fact I could try and draw these characters. 2D animation feels like such a lost art now, and I truly miss it.

@xXOpenYourHeart759Xx

5 жыл бұрын

YES! i miss the warmth and beauty of 2D animation! i would love to see it come back

@radiofloyd2359

5 жыл бұрын

At least anime is still there for us. Also a few semi decent CN and Nickelodeon shows...

@fakecore9811

5 жыл бұрын

@@radiofloyd2359 It's not that 2D animation is completely dead. Modern cartoons are great and all, but Disney's older films had that magic that can't be recreated or found in some of today's cartoons or 2D animated films by other studios.

@rifath8152

5 жыл бұрын

I suggest you look up a videogame called "Cuphead". It's a platformer with an incredibly charming 50's saturday morning cartoon art style (exactly like Tom & Jerry i'd say). All of its character movements and animations, level layouts and backdrops is exclusively hand-drawn. I highly recommend checking out.

@fakecore9811

5 жыл бұрын

@LVS96 I mean most of their older films weren't "original" but I know what you mean! Every Grimm Fairytale (and other authors) based film they made had it's own story in a way. Their films that were indeed original, like Brother Bear, was fantastic. If they do decide to start getting creative again, they could try rewriting more old fairytales, like Rumpelstiltskin or Hansel and Gretel. If they do decide on something original, let's hope it has those same elements and feels Brother Bear had. (i keep rambling im sorry??)

I feel like the reasoning behind these films being made can be summed up in one quote from a Mr. Eugene Krabs “Hello, I like money”

@AniAni-gs7po

5 жыл бұрын

And what inspired you to make these movies?

@danielcooper3332

5 жыл бұрын

Mr Krabs "Money"

@thedissidentleftist6997

5 жыл бұрын

Just like sequels.

@thedissidentleftist6997

5 жыл бұрын

And traveling theater like lion king.

@ashieslashee

5 жыл бұрын

What about “Am I really gonna defile this grave for money?” “You bet I am!”

Okay think of it this way: You're a child with lovingly parents, but one day your parents get replaced by robot parents. The robot parents look the same, act the same as your real parents, but your real parents are slowly getting forgotten. It's the same with the reboots against the classics

@wesmcinerny4524

5 жыл бұрын

Actually, people are already forgetting about each remake that comes out and going back to the originals.

@lfamvs5520

5 жыл бұрын

Wes McInerny I’m hoping you’re right.

@colbbot3291

5 жыл бұрын

That's an interesting analogy. It makes sesne the true spirit of the old movies is not the same as its represented in the remakes. The remakes never capture the spirit of the old movies. There's no heart in the new Disney remakes. Much like the robot parents 🤖 not having a soul or a heart compared to the real parents. Makes sense to me.

@arteinighters

5 жыл бұрын

this is exactly what I say when people ask me why I hate the remakes omg

@theluckyidiot1435

4 жыл бұрын

Your profile pic got me to remember that I just ordered a gravity falls journal 3 special edition thanks

I once saw a comment defending live action remakes saying “Walt Disney wanted to introduce his films to new generations”. Yeah, he did that by re-releasing his films in theaters, and years after his death on video/DVD. A few years ago Disney actually DID do that, by releasing Lion King and Little Mermaid in 3D. If you want younger people to experience old Disney movies, just show them the movies! Bambi came out in 1942 and I watched it when I was 5 in 2006, and I still enjoyed it despite how old the movie was. I also agree with Alex’s idea to remaster old Pixar movies and re release them, because the only thing going against them is some aspects of the animation (especially the humans in Toy Story)

@quackss6384

3 жыл бұрын

Also hes def

@armorwolf7934

3 жыл бұрын

Same can be said for video games remakes are uneeded I hate that argument introducing it to the new generation

@armorwolf7934

3 жыл бұрын

@@Lewtable kzread.info/dash/bejne/lJqAmKWChcysqJc.html even demon souls, Spyro, crash shadow of the colossus suck the old 3D graphics is what makes the game special

@Strange9952

3 жыл бұрын

There's nothing wrong with the originals. The remakes are stupid.

@jackietang3789

3 жыл бұрын

@@Strange9952 two words: Corporate Greed

The classics are beautiful. If it ain't broke. Don't fix it.

@happyh0ur888

5 жыл бұрын

That metaphor doesn't really apply to the concept of live-action remakes.

@Resters52_official

5 жыл бұрын

@@happyh0ur888 yeah it does, there's nothing wrong with the classic 2d movies, they ain't broke, there is nothing to fix, so don't fix them

@happyh0ur888

5 жыл бұрын

@@Resters52_official They're intent is not to fix it, ergo the metaphor does not apply to live-action remakes.

@ajmulenga2532

5 жыл бұрын

Just cause something isn’t broken doesn’t mean there’s no room for improvement

@blackswan4486

5 жыл бұрын

If it’s not Baroque don’t fix it. ~Cogsworth

I just hate how gloomy and boring the live actions look. Where's the color? The energy? It's just so dull and depressing to look at. IHE made some great points.

@murmaider7043

5 жыл бұрын

Wyatt Cheng nigga what

@Malica85

5 жыл бұрын

In fairness, the Cinderella liveaction remake had really pretty visuals tho that was one of the first of the remakes.

@BioLivbanon

4 жыл бұрын

I've heard from a animator friend that if you can't animate then you hide that fact with gloomy colours and darkness. Kinda like Disney~... oh wait...

@Thewolfguys.cartoons2000

2 жыл бұрын

If Buena Vista pictures was in buisness again, all of the disney remakes are going to be 2d animated

The Lion King actually totally proves your point about emotions. Simba looked heartbreaking in the cartoon and everyone felt sorry for him. In this new version he looks.. well.. idk, how am I supposed to know how a lion feels?

@ProwerAdmirer

4 жыл бұрын

" meow prrrr I feel like licking ma ballz"$

@m.syauqiabdurahman2798

4 жыл бұрын

And That What Make Photorealistic CGI Is Bad , They Can't Create The Same Magic Like The Animation One .and hopefully pixar will never make an remake live action of their movie , also im rooting for wes anderson because for me , he was the only one who survived cgi travesty , he rarely used cgi and used stop motion or practical effect . Also i really like a live action movie with no cgi on it , it feel real rather than used cgi .

@DellSubi

3 жыл бұрын

@@ProwerAdmirer Holy shit! Fuckin Accurate!

As an aspiring film maker, I feel sorry for those creators who actually have original ideas for new stuff that Disney rejects to make these remakes. The movies seem like such money grabs and when I try to convince others about this, they just think I'm some film student obsessed with perfection. :(

@jackietang3789

3 жыл бұрын

It's sad to see how Corporate Greed has corrupted our childhood in Disney. Imagine if they one day force Pixar down this route... 😭

@Attmay

2 жыл бұрын

This is why David Lowery and Rob Marshall need to be blacklisted from Hollywood.

Live action lion king? It's 100 % cgi

@hailgarbage4435

5 жыл бұрын

It's funny because Dinosaur had realistic backgrounds and Models, Yet it was promoted as an animated movie

@classica1fungus

5 жыл бұрын

Thank you

@Ermac_______________________69

5 жыл бұрын

100 % crap aswell

@TWolf-gt6if

5 жыл бұрын

@@hailgarbage4435 re watching it again and god damn even the scales still hold up

@skylx0812

5 жыл бұрын

Once it was plain there was money to be made off of student loans a glut of flyby night VFX schools began opening just about everywhere. These schools dumped its graduates and their very limited degrees into an already flooded market and now cgi is everywhere. I dabble into 3d modeling and rendering and its a hobby that can force the unwary onto a treadmill of buy, buy, buy. You've got to buy the latest whatever and constantly upgrade or you'll get left behind of whatever is new and trendy. Its a fascinating medium if you stay on the periphery but at its core its pretty much evil incarnate.

Next thing you know: "live action" emoji movie.

@whiterice6115

5 жыл бұрын

It's just a stop motion movie with emoji pillows

@athena-moena5507

5 жыл бұрын

God please no-

@tommyd2484

5 жыл бұрын

NO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0OOOOOOOOOOOOOO

@cha0tix035

5 жыл бұрын

I would love an anime emoji movie

@mucchin2222

5 жыл бұрын

Oh god please no

now whenever I look up "Lion King" I get only the remake and barely the original so now I have to say it's from 1994.

@bettyunicorn6132

4 жыл бұрын

😭

@thomaswells5272

4 жыл бұрын

That’s the tragedy of all this. The original films, while way better, just don’t feel so unique anymore.

for every remake that comes out this video ages a little bit better

“Lady and the Tramp” is going to be rebooted? My god. We’re going to have to watch two dogs eat spaghetti together in “live-action”? With CGI?

@nicksiddaway2594

5 жыл бұрын

Yes :( is gonna be horrifying (unless the CG is good)

@isthecarpetcomfortable9410

5 жыл бұрын

oh dear

@sloshed-rat

5 жыл бұрын

I just hope it's two literal dogs eating spaghetti for 2 hours while romantic Venetian music plays softly in the backround

@TheXManager1

5 жыл бұрын

Who doesn't want to see realistic dogs making out?

@feraflauna3238

5 жыл бұрын

+Nathan L-Yeah, one of the things that have made me absolutely livid is Disney claiming the Lion King remake is "live action." The fuck it is. . .It's CGI. . .just an entirely different form of animation but STILL animation. . .There is no way the Lion King remake ever should have been considered "live action" unless they are somehow adding humans into the mix. . .At best, the Lion King remake will be more along the lines of the Disney Dinosaur movie where the characters are CGI but there are live backgrounds. . .And Disney wasn't nearly stupid enough at the time to consider Dinosaur live-action in any way. . . Anyway, Lady and the Tramp is getting the "live action"/CGI treatment. WHY?!?!?!?!? What even %^%^%^%^ purpose does that serve? It doesn't make the story any better, it doesn't change the story in any way, and it only further undermines all the hard work, love, and care that did go into these original animated movies.

Now we need animated remakes of the live action remakes

@jaybook1281

5 жыл бұрын

Leviathan *3D animated remakes

@assassincharmander390

5 жыл бұрын

Leviathan And then we need live action remakes of those animated remakes

@scott6605

5 жыл бұрын

That One Guy at 7/11 I mean, these “live action” remakes have so much CGI in them they’re pretty much just 3D animated movies

@animauk5

5 жыл бұрын

Lethal Weapon: The Animated Series?

@Mickael_Mineo

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah, like videogames based on a movie that is based on a videogame.

The new lion king sucked in my opinion

@aname7360

5 жыл бұрын

And that’s a fact!

@creepykidandinfinitedreams2987

5 жыл бұрын

Nunni and Zippy D The original had so much color to reflect in the mood and the movie itself was pure magic, the 2019 version is just dull and boring, I just wanted to leave the theater right then and there.

@sacredhamburger6309

5 жыл бұрын

Creepykid And Infinite Dreams Exactly! At least there are the originals that we can still watch and love

@creepykidandinfinitedreams2987

5 жыл бұрын

Nunni and Zippy D Agreed. :D

@isabellesmit533

4 жыл бұрын

Nunni and Zippy D ok u make a better movie so I can say ur movie sucks ass

Imagine if pixar made a live action cars movie 😂😂😂

@afribean3315

5 жыл бұрын

Oh nononononono NO NO please no

@TylerDean2ndchannel

4 жыл бұрын

I wouldn't know what to say if it happened.

@Thomas-ju4hf

3 жыл бұрын

It would look so bad! 🤮

@Cynique_Noir

3 жыл бұрын

I think you're talking about the Fast and the Furious

There is no point of remaking popular movies like Aladdin and The Lion King. Now if they remade underrated movies like Treasure Planet and Atlantis now I would go watch that.

@matthewmuir8884

5 жыл бұрын

I would watch those, but only if they were being made by people who cared about the project, and as long as they aren't just copies of the originals.

@kimuires

5 жыл бұрын

NO LEAVE TREASURE PLANET ALONE THEY’D JUST MAKE JIM A “RELATEABLE” DUDE BRO TYPE TEEN INSTEAD OF A CHARACTER WITH ACTUAL DEPTH & SILVER THE TIRED “BATTLE WORN MENTOR” STEREOTYPE & THEY’D MAKE AMELIA A MARY SUE WITH NO PERSONALITY Just have the original directors make the Treasure Planet sequel that they had planned already ;3;

@vilmacastro123

5 жыл бұрын

I'd rather they not touch Treasure Planet, remake anything but that. That film was 2D animation magic to me (though it has Deep Canvas and CGI too).

@Account_Not_Applicable

5 жыл бұрын

Treasure Planet, No; aspects about it being 2D animated (as well as flat CGI and Deep Canvas) work perfect for itself and wouldn't translate as beautifully if made all live action (or in the case of the non-human characters, CGI abominations). Atlantis, *YES* ; There's a lot of potential for using CGI to get that 1900s steampunk aesthetic machinery, and there's a whole cast of actual human characters that won't need replaced with CGI characters. And despite not being a Disney movie, I think there should be a live action remake of The Road to El-Dorado. That movie would look great if done in live action; it already feels like a live action movie, but done in animation, as it's more grounded in reality and doesn't have as much animated splendor (aside from that GORGEOUS color pallet in certain scenes) or style like Treasure Planet has

@yeehawjigsaw6579

5 жыл бұрын

@@kimuires What the fuck?? *CHILL.*

I will only allow for Hercules, that is if they let Danny DeVito wear horns and hairy legs

@LoryskaEntertainment

5 жыл бұрын

Daddy Eyebrows I’d actually watch that

@davlew6

5 жыл бұрын

Only if he's swimming in a pool full of chocolate lol

@book4life556

5 жыл бұрын

That one yes i would love to see a remake just to see if they will go with the greek mythology this time it worked for jim Henson.

@RealLukeWilson

5 жыл бұрын

Rick Scott as Hades: imagine

@CaptainDoomsday

5 жыл бұрын

He's a trash demon! He eats GARBAGE!

Christopher Robin and Malificent are the only acceptable "remakes." They just tell a whole different story.

@gonfreecss8753

5 жыл бұрын

Alice in wonderland was also good

@daniboy4153

5 жыл бұрын

I also thought those were good

@KazuhaEien

5 жыл бұрын

I also liked The Jungle Book and Aladdin

@robin3746

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, they put a different dimension on stories that people are familiar with. Now the others, not only have no originality, but have no emotion expressed.

@lowhp_comic

4 жыл бұрын

Nah not Maleficent. The acting and design is great, but Maleficent is SUPPOSED to be an evil badass bitch, not a anti-hero...

I'd agree on you with this one. Apart from being cash grabs they're just flexing their "animation" skills. The New Lion King was just a 2 hour tech demo.

@rigelb9025

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, that is actually a pretty good way of summing it up.. I don't see why they feel the need to subject us viewers to it though... apart from the cash grabbing, of course.

Just wait for the live-action remakes of the "Not Disney" collection

@AniAni-gs7po

5 жыл бұрын

They're gonna dress up cats to be lions.

@ericellerbrock9350

5 жыл бұрын

BattleUp Saber oh god

@S1nwar

5 жыл бұрын

which will all be like porn spoofs or something

@Lucas-td2je

5 жыл бұрын

NO NO NO NO

@gouldenbean7193

5 жыл бұрын

I need a dark gritty Ratatoing

Why is Lion King even considered live action? It's just photorealistic CGI

@MTdaBlacking

5 жыл бұрын

What if they suddenly introduce human characters out of nowhere?

@alanmooreisrasputinreincar8106

5 жыл бұрын

Exactly they pump these out so much and people are so blind that they don't even question the fact that it's the same and it isn't even live action

@TheDjurze

5 жыл бұрын

I don't think Disney has ever claimed that it's live action

@alanmooreisrasputinreincar8106

5 жыл бұрын

@@TheDjurze they do They're called the "live action remakes."

@TheDjurze

5 жыл бұрын

@@alanmooreisrasputinreincar8106 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lion_King_(2019_film) The Wikipedia page for The Lion King 2019 calls it an "animated musical fantasy adventure" I think the "live action remakes" is something someone else started calling them.

"if it ain't broke, don't fiddle with it." you know it's a problem when you have to quote something from teen titans.

@guyonyoutube3850

4 жыл бұрын

"Nope."

@jackietang3789

3 жыл бұрын

Activision and Disney seem to share that very same thing in common: Fixing stuff that isn't broken

"How am I supposed to empathize with a real lion" :D

@rigelb9025

3 жыл бұрын

Plus, in the case of the Lion King remake, it's not even a real friggin' lion!!! I will much more readily empathize with a real one I see in a National Geographic documentary, for example.

Where the blue blazes of heck is my The Brave Little Toaster live action remake, so I can see a real air conditioner shoot sparks and violently explode?

@moonbunny24

5 жыл бұрын

Oh and the clown could be a CGI humanoid monstrosity to perfectly encapsulate the terror that film made me feel!

@Foreststrike

5 жыл бұрын

Oh... god... that dredged back memories of playing with my A/C unit... and having it spontaneously combust.

@PanzerPlant

5 жыл бұрын

MoonBunny24 They should write a solo for the Clown and get Colossal is Crazy to voice it.

@user-sn1ih5ck1s

5 жыл бұрын

The creator originally wanted to make a sequel with cgi animation, but the movie got sold off to another company. No one really knows when it'll be made now.

@PlayMoGame

5 жыл бұрын

The toaster should be portrayed like the one in Fallout New Vegas: "I AM AS BRAVE AS ALL OF YOU OTHER PATHETIC APPLIANCES COMBINED! IF ONLY I HAD A MEANS OF LOCOMOTION I WOULD CONQUER THIS WORLD!"

Can we get a finding nemo live action where it’s just two hours of fish in a tank?

@doc.voltold4232

5 жыл бұрын

I would pay for that one

@alexthebudgie9071

5 жыл бұрын

I would watch that.

@yoshithefriendlydino4025

5 жыл бұрын

I would definetely watch that epic flick!

@graphitetailgrace3870

5 жыл бұрын

Mm, potential-filled idea but it will never compare to the champion of classics: Paint Drying the Movie. No, seriously. It exists. Google it.

@IkaMusume813

5 жыл бұрын

@@graphitetailgrace3870 holy shit I thought you were joking.

I will never give Disney my money anymore. I wish other people felt that way too, then maybe they would stop making them

@artbytesia

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, if people were to stop seeing these, maybe there'd be less.

@anteater9408

3 жыл бұрын

I don't see

@jackietang3789

3 жыл бұрын

@@artbytesia I mean not like a small dip in profit is going to hurt Disney...

I can’t wait for the reanimated remakes of the remakes they made.

@artbytesia

4 жыл бұрын

Don't give them ideas!!

@adyn8811

3 жыл бұрын

Disney: WRITE THAT DOWN, WRITE THAT DOWN

@tapgames3465

3 жыл бұрын

Already done

@god1356

3 жыл бұрын

And then they will remake those

The biggest problem is that with these "live action" movies, the animals or objects are strictly realistic. The thing about the Disney animations is that they were *anthropomorphic,* having HUMAN qualities. You can't be super realistic with the animals AND still have them have human like qualities with facial expressions, it can't mix. The whole point of having human like qualities in these characters is so the audience can get emotionally connected to a character's human traits. That's what Disney isn't understanding. A lion drawn with similar qualities to a human mouth laughing and an actual lion "laughing" are completely different and elicit a different response from the audience.

@BigK13372

5 жыл бұрын

James Burgess Kind of makes you wish they were using the level of CGI from the Scooby-Doo and Garfield movie doesn’t it. Or God forbid any of the Sony Animated Movies.

@justanotherguy2609

5 жыл бұрын

I honestly never thought about it but, now that you mention it, it really is impossible too make the two work together and, it’s basically what causes these films to enter the uncanny valley. Compared to zootopia, the animals in the live action jungle book are way too realistic and you can never really read the emotion in their face. Seriously, I love Disney, but, they really need to stop with the live action remakes.

@fragmentsshow8178

5 жыл бұрын

Or, said in other words: it just doesn´t work. From an artistical perspective, they were doomed. In fact, my first thought was "How are they going to even resemble the same magic and beauty from those animations?". And the answer is simple: they just can´t. I think that knowing that we still have those classics is more than enough.

@musicechoes21

5 жыл бұрын

This is exactly what was said in the video.

@curtthekid402

5 жыл бұрын

That's not true for all live action movies, I mean, The Detective Pikachu Movie seems like it might make that work, so it might work for the Live Action Lion King. Then again, The Detective Pikachu movie has an original plot, is being made by people who really like Pokemon, and the Pokemon designs are being made with the idea of "make it as realistic as possible, but without making it creepy/ too uncanny valley feeling" (I mean, never did I think a "hyper realistic" Mr. Mime would be less creepy then its game counter-part), and hiring actors/ artists who are at least semi-passionate about being part of the project... So yeah, maybe not the best comparison, but a live action remake can work, the makers just have to give a crap about what they're making.

In 2030: Disney buys Sony 2031: *live action remake for into the spider-verse*

@imaadshahrukh4829

5 жыл бұрын

2059: Disney owns every major studio in Hollywood.

@jacquelinelabossiere280

5 жыл бұрын

3001:Disney makes live action alidin live action

@boiyado6717

5 жыл бұрын

3004: Disney makes a live action emoji movie

@justtoby.5155

5 жыл бұрын

3058: Disney takes over all studios in the world

@jonrodriguez2041

5 жыл бұрын

3100:Disney bought earth

People give the excuse of Lion King 2019 being emotion less and bland: WeLL TheY'Re TrYinG to BE REALISTIC. Okay then, why is there no lion genitals? No lion balls?? Why are lions talking? Why are lions friend with a BIRD??And a Mandrill?? Why does animals worship lions? You know REALISTICALLY they don't right? And lions don't sing, either does meerkat, and bird, and boar? And why is this meerkat staying with a boar? In the animates version these are fine details because they're NOT SUPPOSED TO MAKE SENSE, but when you make CGI animals that can't even emote any emotions, with no soul, and stale movements, then there is no excuse. No facial expressions means it's very hard for the audience to relate to the characters, why not just watch a animal documentary right?? Aslan from Chronicles of Narnia in 2005 did it gazillion times better. It looks real, it has emotion, and you can relate because even subtle movements with his eyebrows are him communicating with the audience. Disney has the ability to make this look both real and full of life and emotion, but they chose not to do that, because people will see it no matter what, and in the end, they will still have all the money.

@mosstanuki

5 жыл бұрын

@@panlis6243 yeah I know and it's makes me so mad... The lion king was already perfect, it really doesn't need to be remaked....

@Xehanort10

5 жыл бұрын

And realistic doesn't equal emotionless or bland either.

@hi.241

3 жыл бұрын

@@Xehanort10 from what I remember Walt told the animator to make Micky more realistic but not close to reality but to feel and look lively and expressive or something Idk I'm not an expert sorry for hearing me ramble OK good bye

@brandonsaquariumsandterrar8985

2 жыл бұрын

I like how the first place you went to is the private parts and not how they talk 😂

@mosstanuki

2 жыл бұрын

@@brandonsaquariumsandterrar8985 lmao it’s because I watch a lot of animal documentaries, and seeing a flat under area just makes it so weird to me

3:49 - WOW! Dude, PRIDE ROCK!

Finally someone brings up how bland the Lion King trailer colours look compared next to the original 2D animation.

@alize0623

5 жыл бұрын

RickRaptor105 Do they look like puppets to you too?

@kflowdroppin4s

5 жыл бұрын

alize0623 *COLOURS* is what he said *COLOURS*

@alize0623

5 жыл бұрын

꧁𖤐ᴛѕᴜᴋᴋɪ𖤐꧂ Okay? I’m adding onto that. I think the colors are bland and that the models look like puppets.

@kflowdroppin4s

5 жыл бұрын

alize0623 no you fucking aren't you literally only mentioned "puppets"

@ogingocni6850

5 жыл бұрын

Not as bland as the dceu

"How am I supposed to empathise with a real lion?" They did a pretty good job of it with Aslan in the Narnia films. Now, their lions look lifeless despite the technology being more advanced.

@Gamelover254

5 жыл бұрын

Matthew St. Cyr The thing with Aslan is that he wasn’t the main focus. We still had Human characters to connect with. Watching photo realistic lions talking with less facial expression & no humans is gonna be a giant bore.

@matthewmuir8884

5 жыл бұрын

@@Gamelover254 I'm just saying; they were able to make Aslan talk and emote effectively despite him being photorealistic (for the time), yet this film's trailers can't seem to make any of the lions talk or even make any expression at all. I agree that The Lion King is going to be a giant bore; not because of lack of human characters, but because it's a shameless, uninspired rip-off that can't even convey any emotion or expression at all through its characters.

@Tinky11221

5 жыл бұрын

Aslan was more relatable not only because of the human characters, but because they incorporated some human expressions into the lion, it was subtle but it worked.The video ''Why the Lion King(2019) doesn't work'' by Toon Ruins explains this perfectly.

@giuliab8484

5 жыл бұрын

@@Tinky11221 I just thought of that video when I read this comment lo

@andrewdevine3920

5 жыл бұрын

Aslan was a much more stoic character and didn't sing and dance.

That edit at 6:45 had me in laughing hysterically, I had to pause the video to regain composure. A perfect 'WTF' moment if I ever saw one.

I wish people would stop going to see these movies they are giving Disney the incentive to make.more

@artbytesia

4 жыл бұрын

I feel the same way.

@senpaithehandsomelad7732

4 жыл бұрын

dee dra same

The idea of a live-action Lilo & Stitch terrifies me, honestly, and that’s my favorite Disney movie.

@PeterGriffin11

5 жыл бұрын

Cool profile pic.

@user-we9pt4xg4j

5 жыл бұрын

That's my second,I just hope they don't make a live action Nightmare Before Christmas

@soygato2722

5 жыл бұрын

L Fuck no.

@levistewart8856

5 жыл бұрын

Professor Oak Right back at you.

@hailgarbage4435

5 жыл бұрын

@@user-we9pt4xg4j Oh god

Old classic movie: Exists Disney: *_OH BOY HERE WE GO_*

@imsocoolgurl2

5 жыл бұрын

Why is this comment underrated?

@xdiamondx5721

5 жыл бұрын

What about this Old Movie from Disney: Exists Disney: Its free real estate (Not my comment)

Update: All 3 of these remakes discussed in 2019 were all poorly rated, below 60%

@masterknife8423

5 жыл бұрын

That won't stop Disney from doing them cuz money is more important than actually putting time and effort into creating great movies. Oh the things I would say to Walt Disney about how shit his company has become if he was brought back to life

@ripleyjlawman.3162

5 жыл бұрын

TheNewFlutist Personally I think of the three this year the most actual genuine effort was put into Aladdin.

@muhammadyazid1064

5 жыл бұрын

Nah on imdb aladdin is 7.2 And lion king is 7.2

@_RayNotHere_

5 жыл бұрын

Its metascore

@QuagFire101

5 жыл бұрын

But one of them became the highest grossing animated film of all time. Why..

Image making a live action little mermaid. *wait*

@a.human.beannn

4 жыл бұрын

They are making live action little mermaid in 2020.

@ncrawford5673

4 жыл бұрын

@@a.human.beannn and I have very low standards for it

@annavilla5564

4 жыл бұрын

I'm not sure sure if it's true if who I think is playing her, but I lost a bit of faith in Disney when I found out who's playing Ariel...

@another_random_ace8820

4 жыл бұрын

Cloudy Dreams Adolf Hitler, I think. I heard about it on Reddit.

@yinyangedits5846

3 жыл бұрын

At least there would be forced into LGBTQ representation since Ursula is based off a drag queen

Disney fans: this is the new live action Lion King remake? Disney: yep Disney fans: but all the characters are CGI Disney: yep Disney fan: and the backgrounds are CGI too so if that’s the case then this is an animated movie Disney: that sounds right to me Disney fan: then it’s an animated movie Disney: it’s a live action remake

@draceenasilverdragon7682

5 жыл бұрын

Disney fan: Where is the live part? Disney: We dress the voice actors in full body blue suits with ping pong balls stuck all over to capture the live motion, thus, live action!

@xgardenofedenx

5 жыл бұрын

Disney fan: Excuse me childhood influence would you like a hand with that box? Disney: *Cancellation of cartoons on Disney channel* Disney fan: Ouch! Disney: *buys Lucasfilm, Marvel and 21st Century Fox* Disney fan: Ahh you exploitative money hungry company! What's in that box anyway? Disney: Live action remakes and sequels

@jakerhodes839

5 жыл бұрын

So like an “it’s not my wallet” scenario with Patrick

Disney 2050: THE LION KING 4D REMAKE *WITH 3D GLASSES*

@Dashinvader

5 жыл бұрын

That literally makes no sense

@Koraketta

5 жыл бұрын

@@Dashinvader thats the joke

@Dashinvader

5 жыл бұрын

@@Koraketta Obviously. But the joke it's self doesn't even make sense

@GeneralNickles

5 жыл бұрын

I think you're vastly over estimating the timeline here. It won't take until 2050. Not even close. We'll get that in like 2024.

@Xetelian

5 жыл бұрын

Disney 2050: The Lion King now with actual lions who have had their brains scientifically altered to act in our movie.

It’s essentially like repainting Starry Night realistically. Like yea, impressive, but it’s no longer magical, original, or captivating

If Walt Disney himself was still alive today, he'd be ashamed to see how Corporate Greed has corrupted the very same company he's built from the ground up, *"Money doesn't excite me, my ideas excite me"*

so if the entire movie is CGI is it really "live action "

@dreadlordhg360

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah

@mollymay4846

5 жыл бұрын

No. It's CGI animated, ie It's realistic animation. You wouldn't call a fully 3D rendered realistic video game like Halo "live action." (And they certainly wouldn't want to market it as such, since the term is kind of taboo among the gaming community now).

@dreadlordhg360

5 жыл бұрын

Molly May The title of “live” is meant to imply that it is real. And although it isn’t, it mimics that style and calling it animated wouldn’t work since it lacks traditional animation styles.

@mollymay4846

5 жыл бұрын

@@dreadlordhg360 the definition: live action noun action in films involving filming real people or animals, as contrasted with animation or computer-generated effects.

@jozinek876

5 жыл бұрын

Bbbmurr I mean, The Jungle Book and Beauty and The Beast had live actors, soooo, they were live action in a way. As for The Lion King, that's just an animated movie since it's literally 100% CGI.

in summary: why would you ever watch the remake when you can just watch the original

@artbytesia

4 жыл бұрын

Precisely!

@craigusselman546

4 жыл бұрын

Ask the morons who line up to pay their hard earned money to be schilled.

@jamesbartee4632

4 жыл бұрын

Elyssae kinda to make it look modern

@TheLegodude102

4 жыл бұрын

NINJA FIRE your stupid

@sergeantsupreme4395

4 жыл бұрын

@@TheLegodude102 says the one using the wrong 'your'

"I don't wanna hug this thing. I am terrified(Cracks in his voice) of this."

I'm not even angry at Disney and the whole situation makes me just laugh. I can really only fault Disney for their heartless greed in making the first remake like this and they would have learned their lesson the first time had it bombed. But the thing is, it didn't bomb - it instead made them a lot of money so the greedy cash grabs will continue so long as fools keep rewarding Disney for making them. Perhaps the only thing Disney may be losing out on in this recent remake fad they've got going is that they *might* be selling away their reputation to customers at the expense of being less reputable and trustworthy in the future. But their profits do not seem to be diminishing from these so-called remakes (and don't get me started on their terrible new Star Wars movies).

@supoa9489

4 жыл бұрын

Facts, Disney nostalgia for some reason seems to induce mind control no matter how dull, uninspired and uninteresting remakes are the auidence continue to spend money on them even knowing very well the nature of these films it's baffling to me.

@jackietang3789

3 жыл бұрын

I also blame the causals for that

I mean nothing wrong watching child abandonment in 4K right?

@jelly4049

5 жыл бұрын

Damn u came so fast Justin y v.2

@devontemason8058

5 жыл бұрын

Yea one hand, no on the other.

@yoshithefriendlydino4025

5 жыл бұрын

I don't like that idea ☹

@feralgator1863

5 жыл бұрын

I can’t wait to watch Mufasa get brutally trampled on. Nothing says ‘nostalgia’ quite like mentally scarring the next generation of children.

@runningoncylinders3829

5 жыл бұрын

@@feralgator1863 "mentally *scarring*" Was that a pun on Scar?

Aladdin won't be the same without Robin Williams, and its odd that Disney doesn't realize that

@rukahazuki6650

5 жыл бұрын

I agree. That us my exact thought when the news about Aladdin remake was announced.

@animem54

5 жыл бұрын

um I believe the word is realize

@anddoomsticeforall8140

5 жыл бұрын

All they see is money, money everywhere

@samvimes2821

5 жыл бұрын

They realise, they just don't care. They could pump out any old shit and rake in the cash

@mr.anderson2241

5 жыл бұрын

Javan Patrick Reigner They fucking put in will smith for the genie

2D and 3D animation are still widely regarded for children. Ignorant adults are too stubborn to see that animation isn’t a genre but a medium. Yes , I cried at Coco and I cried at The Lion King, and any sad moment in a live action movie brought me tears by how it shows minimal emotion. the general public needs to acknowledge animation as an art form.

@joeyjerry1586

3 жыл бұрын

What annoys me is people dissing on 3D animation and treating it like soulless. How can you consider yourself an animation fan if you’re just going to hate 3D? I really don’t care if a movie is 3D or 2D. I want a good story and good characters!

Simba looks like an inexpressive kitten in the remake.

This is not just a problem with Disney but the movie industry as a whole. There are so few truly original movies that are free from any ties to a previously successful franchise nowadays and honestly it is sad to see.

@tubbylumpkins4885

5 жыл бұрын

That's always been the case.

@stellarlunar87

5 жыл бұрын

@@fakebird000 As a kid Avatar reminded me a lot of the Transall Saga and something else I can't quite put my finger on. It didn't seem that original to me.

@meurer13daniel

5 жыл бұрын

Stop looking at Hollywwod, then. The movie industry is way bigger than that

@ObsessedwithZelda2

5 жыл бұрын

Avatar kind of supports the Disney remake idea though, since that sold mainly due to its visuals, so the takeaway seems to have been instead of making something original make things with a lot of CG. Idk, CG is fine, but I hope they'll get back to some of the art direction from before

@Mscrestrs

5 жыл бұрын

If they weren't so financially sucessfull, they'd stop making these easy cashgrabs and have to actually take more risks

6:50 Hands with googly eyes, my favorite Jungle Book character.

@kingsleycy3450

5 жыл бұрын

Looks like something straight out of Don't Hug Me I Am Scared.

@Cyberbrickmaster1986

5 жыл бұрын

Nobody ever told me Oobi was in The Jungle Book!

@vendaboi8652

5 жыл бұрын

Kingsley CY, I was just gonna say that. XD

@ryaquaza3offical

5 жыл бұрын

This is strangely terrifying,.. I love it

@Dalton_Boardman2000

5 жыл бұрын

I heard that they cut out Hands googly eyes and re edited his scene by CGing him over. Waste of a good character if you ask me.

Disney: Hello I like money Reporter: What inspired you to make all these Disney remakes. Disney: Money

"I hate live action Disney remakes" Who wouldn't?

@Attmay

2 жыл бұрын

Studio shills like Leonard Maltin. He was wrong about *Pete’s Dragon* twice. Anybody who disliked the original on any grounds and likes that in name only atrocity is a non-person.

@GWKTM

2 жыл бұрын

@@Attmay Amen

I literally just finished editing a video about this, glad to know that I'm not alone on this one lol

@atom4532

5 жыл бұрын

Don't reply to them Edit: Lol he deleted his comment

@aleksabanjevic8316

5 жыл бұрын

No Noooooooooo

@Kitchwamon

5 жыл бұрын

Love your vids dude

@user-te1zl6jc1b

5 жыл бұрын

Edited video and edited comment. N o i c e

@cheesburgrrr

5 жыл бұрын

ily

I hate how people are like “oohh lets go see lion king live action!” “Why?” “well because its lion king!” If thats the case, JUST GO WATCH THE ORIGINAL LION KING!

@mathabathemaripane2262

5 жыл бұрын

I don't see the issue with that 😂. It ain't your money

@thefifelskishow5775

5 жыл бұрын

mathabathe maripane but you are giving Disney money and encouraging them to make more

@supahhotnoodledapx1602

5 жыл бұрын

Star Wars Nerds Idgaf. I want to see a graphically superior lion king.

@loafqueen2975

5 жыл бұрын

Mucchin it’s their opinion. You call them a ‘disgrace’ because they don’t share the same opinion as you? Okay.

@supahhotnoodledapx1602

5 жыл бұрын

Mucchin I’m not. No genuinely want to see the lion king again but in HD. You can fuck off if you have a problem with that for all I care.

Finally, someone who sees past nostalgia bullshit everyone keeps saying.

@jackietang3789

3 жыл бұрын

Don't forget in 2019, the only original release Disney had was a fucking Penguins documentary, take with that what you will

I never understood the appeal of Disney and Anime/Manga live-action adaptations. There’s too much live action already. They should have used the money for more experimental and interesting long form animation both as series and movies.

We already got a live action remake of "The Lion King", it was called "Black Panther".

@takileafs

5 жыл бұрын

lmao

@frens_till_the_end

5 жыл бұрын

It’s creepy how similar they are.

@sonicdash9652

5 жыл бұрын

And it sucked.

@legohkfan

5 жыл бұрын

Savage

As someone who wants to work in the animation industry, seeing a company I grew up with go down this path makes me incredibly sad. The whole point of animation from the beginning was to do what 'live-action' movies couldn't- they pushed the boundaries of what was possible. If you're making an animated movie as realistic and fancy as possible, why not just make it using real actors? Movies like 'Into the Spider-verse' really capture the essence of what animation could be. The blend of completely different animation styles and effects that wouldn't be possible with real actors is what makes that movie so appealing to look at. Heck, Fantasia was revolutionary because of how unique the animation was. Sure, you could do any of that stuff with computers now but what would be the point? It's already been done beautifully.

@grommet2795

5 жыл бұрын

You have an interesting view! As I read this, it really reminded me of art history; when photography was introduced in the 1800s and what happened to the culture of painting. When just a picture could immortalize one's surroundings, realistic painting seemed to become too much work and irrelevant. Thus, impressionism was born to capture a feeling and the emotion of the light; it became more of an artistic expression than a realistic rendering of the world.

@havoren

5 жыл бұрын

I was actually thinking about going to see that movie in theatres, and after reading your comment I think I’m gonna go see it. Hopefully it’s funny as fuck, I didn’t think the trailers were bad!

@havoren

5 жыл бұрын

All Light Your comment is the voice of our generation. A really racist generation. A really racist generation of Donald Trump supporters.

@Neo2266.

5 жыл бұрын

Hey I’ve once heard an advice from an animator to other people about becoming animators: *_DON’T_*

@FireBlastStudios

5 жыл бұрын

@All Light you are the definition of racist

5:00 i like how you randomly sound like you're about to cry

7:06 He, low-key, predicted live-action Mulan.

Damn. I thought the Dumbo remake was unnecessary, but Lady and the Tramp? Really?

@calebproductions1264

5 жыл бұрын

It gets worse, they’re gonna make a live action remake of Mulan next year.

@whiterabbit75

5 жыл бұрын

@@calebproductions1264 I heard about that one, but a Lady and the Tramp "live action" remake is going to be almost as bad as the Lion King remake will be.

@musicalmuddinto4256

5 жыл бұрын

Son we need a little mermaid 2 remake

@whiterabbit75

5 жыл бұрын

@@musicalmuddinto4256 Why stop there? Why not all the animated movies? Hell, why not do a live action remake of the cartoon shows? Come on, Di$ney, that money is out there, waiting for you. Don't you know that those movies and shows no longer exist, and the current generation need them?

@musicalmuddinto4256

5 жыл бұрын

@@whiterabbit75 I've always wanted a live action Johnny test

Imagine Pixar running out of ideas and making A “live action” toy story

@firefly361

5 жыл бұрын

I would watch live action Cars though.

@gillesvanmeer6114

5 жыл бұрын

Sexual Chocolate Robbie that would probably be weird and creepy cause A “real life” car with a face would probably fail hahahaha

@martinmystere1359

5 жыл бұрын

Stop motion?

@maydayo1816

5 жыл бұрын

Live action zootopia

@gillesvanmeer6114

5 жыл бұрын

May Dayo real animals with clothes 🤔

"Stop making them" is what Disney needs to do.

I told my friends that if they spoiled live action Lion King I'd steal all their pringles. *Then I realized that it's the Lion King. I know how it ends.*

Who asked for a ' Dumbo remake?'

@TheVanishing87

5 жыл бұрын

I sure didn't! I always thought that movie a bit boring and not to mention majorly depressing. I like Tim Burton, but you just know he's going to make the movie look even more gloomy with drab colors just like his Alice movies.

@insectinvagon5037

5 жыл бұрын

I think it's a good thing. Maybe this one will flop, and they'll stop milking this cash cow, and start making original stories

@polarhero57

5 жыл бұрын

TheVanishing87 Better yet, the elephant can’t even talk in this one! They are literally writing a mostly new story with the same characters. This movie is gonna flop (I hope)

@mattthomas3914

5 жыл бұрын

despair bear

@msw0322

5 жыл бұрын

Let alone a Dumbo remake directed by Tim Burton! Jesus, hasn't that bastard done enough damage to classics like Willy Wonka?!

As a Supervising Animator on a number of the original versions of the films you discuss here, I agree with you on nearly all counts. You make some very good points in you analysis. Hollywood seems to have forgotten that animation is not the replication of reality it is the caricature of same. It is sad to have to sit and watch the films and characters we toiled so hard on be reduced to mediocre film graphics. But look at the BO (that’s box office not body odor), on these things. People get huge bonus’ for bringing in that kind of money and the profits tell them that what they are doing is wanted and needed. As for respect for what has come before, for the most part, yes, I know my work will outlive me. But having taught animation for over 30 years, in studio and in colleges, I have to say that in very recent years the lord and master of many future animators is, indeed, technology. What we did is looked down upon as old and irrelevant by some of today’s students. They want ease and repetition and arch characters in random situations because it’s easier to create and builds upon known vernacular over creating new. Attention to detail, likable characters, warmth, depth, life, it’s all just to hard to do and requires thought and commitment so it is being dismissed as out of fashion. Of course there are many talented young people studying animation today who do not fit this mold and I pray they will succeed and be given the opportunity to give their best on something slightly more challenging and rewarding that Stephen Universe, Gravity Falls or Rick and Morty. Time will tell, I guess. Thank you for you post and I’m sure you don’t REALLY hate EVERYthing 😉.

@bettyunicorn6132

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks, for your comment. I will like to create a hand-drawn and CGI mix movie myself. And I am sure that in the future the playing field will be much more even in animation.

@heliodorable4612

4 жыл бұрын

Wow I can't believe this comment doesn't have more attention! It's so incredible to see a legend in the animation industry discuss the modern era

@gfamily2478

3 жыл бұрын

I think Steven universe is overrated

Actually, *5* remakes in 2019. Remember Maleficent 2, the sequel to that remake?

@RJIS

3 жыл бұрын

That was the only good one in 2019 imo

@saintsheepy6682

2 жыл бұрын

That one was awful, ruined the 2014 Maleficent for me, and considering the awful tone and implications it had, with its "Let's just celebrate and be happy despite the fact a ton of innocent fairies and woodland creatures were killed via genocide as it wasn't a big deal at all, and let's not punish some villains who did that", that not only was a very ugly foreshadowing of what was to come from Disney's thought process (remember where they filmed parts of Mulan 2020?), that in itself made it the worst 2019 Disney film to me.

im glad to hear someone explain how much different and sometimes better animation is than realistic looking things. animation is probably the type of thing i watch the most and i dont care to say that i watch cartoon/anime bc cartoons/anime is awesome. love yourself and thanks for appreciating this art form.

The biggest part of it: the original writers, storyboard artists and other people who worked on the original will never see a CENT of the millions Disney makes off the remake.

@Harkness78

5 жыл бұрын

well, they did a job to make a movie for Disney, they got paid, that's it. Disney owns the product of their labor, and can then make sequels or remakes and the artists aren't entitled to anything because they signed up to make a movie for a gigantic corporation in the first place. Makes sense to me. Hell 80% of these stories are based on fables that the artists you mention did not originate, so I see even less reason to pay them into perpetuity.

@DaviniaHill

5 жыл бұрын

CGI artists rendering Iron Man don't get a cut of RDJ's $200m from Infinity War.

I'd just like to state for the record that The Lion King is gonna have almost entirely computer generated animals and they're still calling it a live action film. And yet at the same time Disney treats Dinosaur as one of their animated films

@invaderpez12

5 жыл бұрын

Disney isn't calling it live action, audiences are. All Disney said was they are making a Lion King Remake and since all their remakes have been live action everyone called it that.

@Lauren_210

5 жыл бұрын

Exactly. I don't get that one. Does anyone smell hypocrisy anywhere?

@wil.d_sage

5 жыл бұрын

i would actually love to see dinosaur redone with the modern technology. It was one of my favorite movies growing up

@lankytwt

5 жыл бұрын

@@wil.d_sage such an underrated movie imo

@wil.d_sage

5 жыл бұрын

thelankymidget the soundtrack is amazing!

20th century Disney: They make money to make movies Disney now: They make movies to make money

8:27, my god dumbo with that face paint scared to shit out of my pants...

They need to remake Hercules Why? DANNY DEVITO AS PHIL LETS GO

@Tinyterror-dn5cs

5 жыл бұрын

The Accidental Hipster YES

@natalierose2957

5 жыл бұрын

That is the only remake I would be on board for!

@comedyman2817

5 жыл бұрын

Scooty scoot

@theaccidentalhipster4005

5 жыл бұрын

I would actually like to revise my plan Hercules except danny devito plays all the characters. Hercules, meg, phil, everyone

@thomasbirchall7342

5 жыл бұрын

Best thing is, Danny Devito is in the live action Dumbo

“I hate it when big companies try to make profit off nostalgia.” Me too

@AdmiralBonetoPick

5 жыл бұрын

Best line: "What us this photo-realistic baboon thinking?"

@Dashinvader

5 жыл бұрын

Don't people hate them because of nostalgia? I mean people compare them to the old ones and say that because it's not in the goofy exaggerated drawings then it's an insult to the main product. When the movies are still animated, they keep the same story, and are trying something new and not just giving the same things over and over. If anything that sounds like everything people want in a reboot.

@NhBleker

5 жыл бұрын

Ricey超極 Unless it’s in the case of ID software with Doom 2016 and Machine Games with Wolfenstein The Old Blood and New World.

@jasu_kpc

5 жыл бұрын

Cole Brown Sony killed 3, but it’s still a good close. Also Goth Peter best Peter prove me wrong

@Smurfman256

5 жыл бұрын

@@NhBleker The difference being that, while Disney is doing it purely for the money, the guys at id Software and Machine games knew what made the DOOM and Wolfenstein franchises work (even if id DID originally make both DOOM and Wolfenstien 3D, id is now almost entirely composed of new blood by this point).

2018 IHE: Disney can you stop with these remakes 2020 Disney: haha! WE DO MORE

@Attmay

2 жыл бұрын

2022 rest of the world: watch your stock price get cut in half

Holy shit, this is from 2018? Still feels very relevant almost 3 years later.

"Its not anthropomorphic, it's anthropoboring" - Alex, 2018

Remember 101 Dalmatians from the 90s? That was a true "live action" remake

@maximillianlylat1589

5 жыл бұрын

Thats their best live action remake IMO it took a different angle from the original and used real non talking dogs and allowed the human characters to be more fleshed out.

@zombelladonna

5 жыл бұрын

TUSSLES they’re remaking that too. Seriously check out the Disney films Wikipedia page, you’ll be either totally shocked or totally unsurprised....but every film they’ve ever made will be going under the knife in the next few years. Disney is just the show Botched

@notchuckproductions5029

5 жыл бұрын

Remember the live action 90s jungle book movie by Disney

@taloscal

5 жыл бұрын

I remember Glenn Close being an absolute nutcase in it... ended up just making it even funnier though.

@YourPalHDee

5 жыл бұрын

Looking forward to the next one where Cruella Deville is CGI, the dogs are completely CGI, the cameras that film the movie are CGI, the director is CGI, when we go watch the movie at the cinema we get transformed to CGI. It'll be great

I legit got jump scared when you flipped to the dumbo clown scene

People keep trying to make me see these movies by saying "they're pretty good" why the fuck would I see them if I've already seen something that is pretty much identical and IS INFINITLEY BETTER

Christopher Robin actually continued the story of Winnie the Pooh. It was charming in it's message about growing up but not forgetting your childhood. Everything else is just a nostalgia grab.

@JayTohab

5 жыл бұрын

...Debatable, but ok.

@kimuires

5 жыл бұрын

I mean, it was ALSO a nostalgia grab But it tried to be its own thing so its okay in my book

@IGamingStation

5 жыл бұрын

Why is everyone not mentioning Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland? What was wrong with that movie? Much of the material in that movie is based on the original story.

@minaxx8966

5 жыл бұрын

Some little kids might still watch the classics if their parents get it for them

@Isaacarthy

5 жыл бұрын

DPC I personally loved Christopher Robin

"realistic" = better is probably my least favorite trope in media/audience opinion. It's the same reason so many people prefer impossibly overly edgy and terrible DC movies still over literally any other superhero film. It's baffling to me how unappreciated animation, Especially 2D animation is to me nowadays everywhere other than Japan. I really hope this trend ends at some point and we just go back to making films and games in whatever presentation style actually makes the product as good as it can be.

@caseyclark5174

5 жыл бұрын

@@DeepFriedSpagehetti-rq7iu Marvel is for sure much more popular, but the DC movies somehow keep making enough money to continue being made, despite all of them being awful and rated very poorly on any review site. So clearly some large group of people somewhere keeps watching them like the transformers movies.

@aleksabanjevic8316

5 жыл бұрын

UuUuUh bUt If ItS rEaLiStIc It MeAnS iTs mOrE MaTuRe, CaRtOoNs ArE fOR kIdS, No MaTtEr ThE cOnTeNt (you know, like rick and Morty, bojack horseman, south park, a lot of anime, Ralph Bakshi movies.... I still don't get why people see animation as being only for kids)

@kazuo398

5 жыл бұрын

I think 2d animation is still popular especially in tv shows. Animator are explored everywhere though. Even in Japan

@lildaffy1695

5 жыл бұрын

MCU was sucessful because how aware unrealistic and over the top thier stories are, just like a comic book.

@lastbaratheon8043

5 жыл бұрын

Exactly

To sum up my one of my biggest issues with these remakes, as we all know, every medium of entertainment has its advantages in disadvantages. Disney’s “bread and butter” as u put was clearly their 2D animation, their area of expertise, where they produced their best, most unmatched work. So much so that it’d be almost impossible to imagine a 2D Disney movie, with their lovely color, art direction, animation, etc. to be replicated in any other medium. And whenever they try putting these films in the different (and much cheaper) medium of live action, they are losing all those advantages they flexed in the originals. Live-action is not Disney’s bread and butter (in terms of quality, not income), but now they are trying to make it that. They have the money, time and talent to do anything they want, but they don’t want to do anything “magical” anymore.

Disney is basically insulting itself; "ei you remember that movie that were animated in, pfft, 2D (🙄)? Yeah, how about we ACTUALLY make them good because everyone knows realism=better animation!"