pewdiepie: "celebrates not having redhair" Jarrett: "oh ok then"

@stanisawzokiewski3308

2 жыл бұрын

Its good to have souls

@DJ7ful

8 ай бұрын

​@@stanisawzokiewski3308 You would have fun of him if he will be black?

@emrecanarduc4378

4 ай бұрын

@@DJ7ful that is an internet and South Park meme

How embarrassing that Felix thought Vikings only came from Norway

@Rullvard1337

3 жыл бұрын

Yep

23&me have updated their algorithm, and many get 100 or close to 100 % in one region. Europeans are less mixed than Americans, so I am not surprised he is 100% Scandinavian.

@vincentfox4929

3 жыл бұрын

The very idea of RACE doesn’t really work outside of America. People identify with their specific ethnicity and less so with their colour.

@greasher926

3 жыл бұрын

@@vincentfox4929 yes in the US people are so mixed that they use race as a proxy/stand in for ethnicity, and really that is what Americans are doing. For instance when Americans think of “black” they are thinking specifically of black Americans which are a distinct cultural unit that can be though of as a ethnic group of its own and completely different from say a Nigerian or Ethiopian. Likewise “Whites” are so mixed that they to have formed their own distinct cultural/ethno group which is completely distinct from say the English, French, Germans etc. In fact in the US census lists “American” as an option for those people who have lived in the US for so long and are so mixed that they are unable to trace their origin to one specific country.

@LaughingMan44

3 жыл бұрын

@@vincentfox4929 Dear fucking God...Race is an informal term. We don't apply scientific species/sub-species ,with further more informal sub categories, to Humans because too many people will get offended without understanding what any of these terms even mean. Human populations form genetic clusters, these generally conform quite well to traditional race classifications (which was far more nuanced than today's race classifications you'll find on censuses). So there is a general genetic grouping that is European, which is comprised of many ethnicities. This grouping is genetically and morphologically distinct from other genetic clusters, such as sub Saharan Africans. Yes, there will be edge cases and complications, but it works well enough. Fun fact: you can measure the genetic difference/similarity between populations; the American Grey Wolf and Cayote are as genetically similar/different to each other as a Northern European and West African. Also anything below 5% from 23&me might as well just be noise/false positives, and I don't think they take any historic samples into account.

@MathildaFlow

3 жыл бұрын

I'm pretty sure I'd come back as 100 % Scandinavian, if not 100 % Swedish if that can be determined. So far, the only non-Swedish connection I've found is my great great great grandfather who was born in Finland, but he had a Swedish name, so... And then of course the part of Sweden one of my grandmothers was from belonged to Denmark a few hundreds of years ago so maybe I'm part "Danish" from before 1658. And no, that would not make me special in Sweden.

@youtubedeletestomanyaccoun4247

3 жыл бұрын

@@MathildaFlow definitely 100% Scandinavian

he didnt use facecam for a bit as a little joke lol and had a "face reveal"

@hummingmirrordecals

3 жыл бұрын

Reverse face reveal 😂

@VirgoLunaKnight

3 жыл бұрын

@@hummingmirrordecals 😂😂😂

I thought it said you were a gynecologist and was wondering why you'd have an opinion on this

@flaca11

3 жыл бұрын

bahahahhahaha

@b6b6b6b6b6

3 жыл бұрын

bruh lmao

@tokioshock3625

3 жыл бұрын

I don´t know why, but the same happen to me .

@stevelknievel4183

3 жыл бұрын

Is there any reason why gynaecologists shouldn't have an opinion on genetic genealogy?

@fairycat23

3 жыл бұрын

lol (but if you _are_ looking for a gynecologist video, try Mama Doctor Jones)

I took a DNA test and my suspicion was confirmed that I am 100% Finnish.

@vtsoi4413

3 жыл бұрын

then i guess you're "Finnished"

@R.Th.Allan1988

3 жыл бұрын

Finnish him!

@gilnahnu

Жыл бұрын

@@R.Th.Allan1988 hahah i thought the same thing!

His haplogroup is I-M170. His ancestors most likely lived in that area for a very very long time and most likely did not mix much.

@vergil8833

3 жыл бұрын

As is the case for most of Scandinavias history. They went alot of palces but no one went to them.

@Talvekuningas

3 жыл бұрын

@@vergil8833 well .. that changed nowadays and fast. lots of mixing ! LOTS ! lot's of new sperm.

@toxicbee990

3 жыл бұрын

Pure Viking...

@Bridge_2702

2 жыл бұрын

How do you know that?

It's common for people in the UK to have Scandinavian ancestry due to the Vikings, not the other way around. Because...reasons... 😉

@julianamagg3177

3 жыл бұрын

Well. Although Iceland is Nordic but not Scandinavian it was settled by scandis 1200 years ago with a lot of UK and Irish slaves so we have a lot of Irish and Scottish DNA. And you see a little of that in Scandinavian countries but still some.

@liksomkjeks

3 жыл бұрын

A lot of Scandinavians have British %. Either as a consequence of a lot of contact across the North Sea (including in the 900 years since Viking times) and due to the fact that our DNA may be too similar to tell apart at times.

@zinatarata

3 жыл бұрын

It's quite common on the west coast of Norway to have a little UK DNA and I think it's more likely that it's from the fishing and trade that has been done for the last centuries and not necessarily from the Viking age. It's not been uncommon for sailors and fishermen to have a bit of fun when they went to shore and leave some DNA behind.

@LaughingMan44

3 жыл бұрын

@@julianamagg3177 "A lot" isn't less than 20%?

@LaughingMan44

3 жыл бұрын

@@liksomkjeks No, British Isles are genetically distinct from Scandinavia, it's because of Viking pillaging/settlement that UK has Scandi ancestry.

My mom did a test with 23andme and got 99.8% Scandinavian ( 0.2% north african ) and I give her crap saying "you can't get more Scandinavian than that"...welp PewDiePie proved me wrong 😂

@Janttura

3 жыл бұрын

I am 100% finnish according to a gene test 😆 Not only scandinavian though 🇫🇮

@guilhermealmeida7444

3 жыл бұрын

she can say the n word

@dystopicat

3 жыл бұрын

@@CaraCreations1000 Where are you from? I was only 82% Scandinavian according to the test I did through My Heritage.

@realJoshiBOI

3 жыл бұрын

I will be doing my test with 23andNe soon (likely this week), and I'll be making a video about it as well. I'll let y'all know about the results, but anyway...

@kuvatpatakhov5863

3 жыл бұрын

Haha your ancestors go to North Africa for raid or trade and comeback together with beloved

Alot of swedes have some Finnish dna because of our long common history and forest-finns and seafearers and åland snd samis

@herrkulor3771

3 жыл бұрын

And the other way around also. Many swedish decendants in the swedish speaking parts of finland. Just want to point that out to people from far away.

Pewds doing v-tubing was more a meme than anything. Didn’t really stick to it very long.

Lol, PewDiePie is Swedish, but he thought the Vikings came only from Norway?!

@NapoleonBonaparde

3 жыл бұрын

Some of the main viking kingdoms were in Denmark

@N_0968

3 жыл бұрын

@@NapoleonBonaparde i

@whycantihaveanumber00000

3 жыл бұрын

The Vikings that did the most seafaring and distant traveling were most likely Norwegian. The Norseman that had the most extended time and relevancy in the UK, namely England, were the Danes. Swedes are obviously viking descended as well, though they dealt with mainland Europe mostly

@Rullvard1337

3 жыл бұрын

@@whycantihaveanumber00000 Swedes became bodyguards to the Byzantine Emperor, and Swedes founded the Kieran Rus’

@Rullvard1337

3 жыл бұрын

@@whycantihaveanumber00000 But it also depended on where in Sweden you lived. I live in West Sweden and I don’t think the Swedes here would’ve went to the east when the west is closer. And maybe my place wasn’t even in the kingdom of Sweden yet, I think it was apart of the gothic kingdoms

Yay, was waiting for this one! Shame he didn’t dwell much on the haplogroups. I don’t think the DNA companies ‘market’ it very well. I’ve increasingly found it to be one of the more interesting things in DNA because admixture you can find out from your genealogical research, but for haplogroups there’s next to no way of knowing without a test

@rem134

3 жыл бұрын

I got into DNA testing and Genealogy because I participated in the national geographic study where they looked at Deep Ancestry. While its a small part of who you made up of still interesting to see where your ancestors all travels from over thousands of years. This lead to want to know more details hence the genealogy.

@worldtraveler134

2 жыл бұрын

HAPLOGROUPs are DNA in my opinion L3 branch mother and because I had my brother tested found out Dad is the Father of ALL haplogroups with the Rare (A) in America!

@ChristopherB2019

2 жыл бұрын

His paternal is I-L22, which is very Nordic.

Hello. I hope you laugh. That laughter is priceless and lifts my soul. Program is GREAT!

Tell him to tell us his Haplo Groups. It will be the same as the picture of the map showing wanderings out of the British Isles maybe but if not that would be so interesting.

I had medical genetic testing done when I 15 by a geneticist because I have a rare genetic disorder and they were trying to determine which type of the disorder I have. I only got the results on that one specific thing. They never gave me a whole genetic profile. Now I'm super curious to know what else was in there

Yep. I’m from the UK. I know I have Irish in me but thought I was totally English other than that. When I got my results back a chunk of me was Norwegian!

@sygycollins2985

3 жыл бұрын

yeppp the vikings!!!!!!

@haltdieklappe7972

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah I always thought I was just english but turns out I’m mostly Scottish and German lol and barely English

@dinamycvideosgaming1597

3 жыл бұрын

Im from spain and me too i got some scandinavian

I’m hoping at some point they’re able to trace Sami ancestry. There’s a family story of there being some Sami in the woodpile. Looking at my results I have this random bit of Finnish DNA and some of my Norwegian DNA is showing from Finnmark, which is Sami territory. Whether there’s Sami or not, I definitely have strong Scandinavian DNA.

@GoalOrientedLifting

3 жыл бұрын

You should look up "viking stories" he explains some of the DNA where it came from and some cool stories about interactions between the vikings and the sami people

@whycantihaveanumber00000

3 жыл бұрын

Maybe Kvenni related? The Kven people are also from Norway

@rachaeldover5170

3 жыл бұрын

Woodpile lol

You could see quickly he was ydna I1!

@GeneaVlogger

3 жыл бұрын

Nice catch! I1 is connected to Vikings and is one of the main focuses of the Viking and Invaders Y-DNA Project - www.familytreedna.com/groups/vikingydna/about/results

@williamjohansson5715

3 жыл бұрын

@@GeneaVlogger cool! It's weird how the dominant haplogroup in Scandinavia differs from the R1a/R1b of east/westeurope. Balkan ppl usually belongs to the I-family aswell (I2).

@dulmater

3 жыл бұрын

@@williamjohansson5715 yeah I've seen videos before where people associate this to the Aesir-Vanir war from Germanic myth where the pantheons merge afterwards. R1A and R1B seem to be the most common haplogroups in all pre-colonial Indo-European speaking people except for Iran (which can easily be explained by Arabic, Turkic, Mongol conquests) and Germanic Europe which is less easily explainable. Germanic speaking countries seem to be close to 50/50 splits with R1 variations and I variations with it varying from country to country sometimes being 75/25 one way or the other but both groups being the two largest. Seems Germanic peoples came from a mix of Indo-European people and another group as we moved west.

@Ceelle2

3 жыл бұрын

When I visited Denmark...learned the Swedes and the Danes have a long history of tension...and Norwegians and Danes get along fine. The reason for his angst.

@AmandaFromWisconsin

3 жыл бұрын

The Y-DNA haplogroup of a male cousin of mine on my mom's side (who's the son of my mom's brother and therefore has my grandfather's Y-DNA) is I-P109, which is a subclade of of the I1 haplogroup. What's interesting is that the genealogical paper trail of that particular male line very likely traces back to East Anglia in England, which was part of a large area of England that was settled by Vikings.

The Scandinavians went alot of places, but not alot of people went to Scandinavia. Their connection to the british isles pretty much just one-way. Scandinavians going to them, not the other way around. The most recent studies suggest that there was only one migration to Scandinavia after the initial Yamnaya indo-european migration, and that was in the viking age. But it wasn't foreign people going to scandinavia, it was the teutons and goths who left scandinavia and age earlier who then returned there in the viking age. Obviously their DNA would be pretty much the same so it is really just more scandinavian migrating to scandinavia afetr a few generations outside of Scandinavia. Either way, that is why Scamdinavians don't have any british DNA, or any DNA from anywhere else for that matter, it had a mythical status throughout ancient history so no one actually went there. It was never invaded until WW2.

@stormtrooper8420

2 жыл бұрын

Wrong! they took a lot of slaves from different part of europe and other parts of world to Scandinavia. A lot of Scandinavians have british and other European DNA

@DJ7ful

8 ай бұрын

You're wrong. Scandinavia was invaded many times before WW2. A lot of Polabian Slavic rulers were raiding Scandinavia. For example, today's Kungälv (former capital city of Norway) was destroyed by the prince Racibor the First. Scandinavians also fought against each other, also in 1598, Poles took over Stockholm. There were also many wars between Denmark and German's countries, and between Sweden and Russia (and for example, Russians took over Gotland island in the 19th century). Of course - there was no that much war in borders of today's Scandinavians countries like in other European countries, but saying that it were never invaded since WW2 is not true.

0:45 You should expect that sort of result from MyHeritage, but not from 23andMe. I have personally tested with both companies. If your known ancestry is only from a specific country, 23andMe will most likely assign you a result that is ~100% of one ethnic element. MyHeritage instead tends to give a big mix. And for biracial people, 23andMe is usually able to do a perfect a 50%-50% split, whereas MyHeritage tends to botch the results of mixed people. I have a cousin that is half Spanish and half West Asian (Kurdish), and she got a near perfect 50%-50% split on 23andMe (I was surprised by the accuracy given that sometimes South European and Western Asiatic DNA may not be very easy to delineate). But she got this absurd result on MyHeritage: 37.1% Iberian 29.0% West Asian 21.3% Greek and South Italian 6.9% Italian 5.7% Ashkenazi Jewish Here is a comparison of my own result from 23andMe and MyHeritage. My known ancestry is 3/4 Iranian and 1/4 Kurdish. Here is the absurd result from MyHeritage: West Asian 92.6% > Turkey South Asian 4.9% Ashkenazi Jewish 2.5% As you can see, even their Genetic Groups update got it totally wrong! Note that a large percentage of Iranians get South Asian and Ashkenazi Jewish, even though there has been hardly any migration of those groups, and Iran has been largely reproductively isolated in the recent centuries. The test might be picking up ancient similarities between the groups, in which case the results are misleading. For comparison here is my result with 23andMe: Iranian, Caucasian & Mesopotamian 100% Isfahan Province, Iran Kurdistan Region, Iraq +10 regions As you can see, even the cities are spot on... even that 1/4 was precisely identified!

@RAiNfORAiNbOW

3 жыл бұрын

thanks for sharing your experience

It´s rare for Swedes to get 100% Scandinavian. As a Swede I am 79% Scandinavian. I often find Finnish, Baltic, West European, British dna in Swedish relatives.

@dieKommentiererin-q1h

3 жыл бұрын

Lol

@bendover4668

3 жыл бұрын

You’re just unpure.

@nieczerwony

3 жыл бұрын

I am Polish and have over 90% Scandinavian. Now how weird is that?

@xander7552

3 жыл бұрын

even a lot less for italian DNA, we italians have often greek, sardinian, iberic, north african and middle east, with sometimes some scandinavian, west european and nigerian DNA

@bigtim3060

3 жыл бұрын

@@bendover4668 if you mean that hes not inbread, then yes.

Very many people in Sweden have celiac and other digestive disorders, more than usual. The supermarket shelves are full of palliative drinks, oddly this is more prevalent in areas with high Finnish immigration. I wonder if he has hypermania in his family tree, too.

@brawndothethirstmutilator9848

3 жыл бұрын

That’s interesting. As someone with Celiac I did not know this. I had only heard of the high incidence of Celiac linked to Italian ancestry.

Like most Icelanders, I got a blend. I was 56% Welsh, Irish, Scottish and 44% Scandinavian. Pretty accurate considering the history of Iceland.

@julianamagg3177

3 жыл бұрын

What I want to know is how many Icelanders have Sami DNA. I wonder if they tell you that.

@bigtim3060

3 жыл бұрын

@@julianamagg3177 likely not too many

23andme changed its algorithm. Over the years I've seen my ethnicity estimates going up and down some appearing and disappearing. Today they have him 100% Scandinavian. Maybe next year he'll be 70%

@lilricky5050

3 жыл бұрын

Tbh I believe 23andMe only updates peoples results so it makes it seem like “new results” each time. I’m 25% sub Saharan African and 75% European and I’ve seen my results or different ethnicities percentages go up and down

That whole video felt like a personal attack on you : obesity, bald spot, red hair 'hell yeah I don't have those'

My grandson has one grandfather that is a full Lakota Indian. The other 3 are English/Dutch/German. My grandson only shows as having 9% Native American, his sister has 2%. LOLOLOL. It really is a crapshoot.

@fmjjjjn7510

3 жыл бұрын

I’m so confused rn

12:08 he looks so offended by what he said 🤣🤣

I believe he’s Swedish but moved to England. I could be wrong though.

Wait but now Felix will destroy that family tree of his 😂🙈 he’s married to an Italian woman soooo their kids won’t be 100% Viking anymore 😅😜

@jmab721

2 жыл бұрын

No one in Scandinavia is 100% viking.

@stormtrooper8420

2 жыл бұрын

@@jmab721 apparently pewdiepie is

That is the first DNA results I have seen that were 100% one thing.

@georgek5737

2 жыл бұрын

I have seen one done by a Greek that came back as 100% and it was sooo surprising taking into consideration the ottomans and the thousands of years of settling and trading.

12:58 I hate cilantro too! Some people just don't understand and serve it to you anyhow

@haldouglas4773

3 жыл бұрын

generally it's used as a garnish so yeah, it'll be served to everyone. just gotta suck it up and pick it off.

As a redhead I object!!!! ;) :P

Environment plays a role too.

So... I took one of those dna test from my heritage. I live in Denmark, so i knew there would be a lot of scandinavian dna in there... but it came back as 100% scandinavian... I didn't expect that as the family stories goes "We got some travellers blood, some irish and some spanish mixed in as well" .... I guess that was lies...

About the features that people may or may not have (like different hair waviness and so on), I understand why it isn't interesting for the person taking the test, as these features are already defined in him, but isn't it related to the probability your children would inherit these features thus making it interesting again?

I found it interesting that you said many English people have Scandinavian dna, because I can trace most of my dad's ancestors to the UK and some to Germany, but have 4% Swedish dna in my ancestry report. It originally said 8% Scandinavia before the latest update. It must have come from those ancestors.

@theresamnsota3925

3 жыл бұрын

You should visit Iceland. At their history museum in Reykjavik, they mention that there are definite Irish roots in Iceland, as the Vikings after making a “pit stop” in England, Scotland, and Ireland, they often brought Celtic women along for the trip to Iceland.

Hi from Ukraine. I love your videos

I couldn’t believe he skipped over his haplogroups. They were the first things I looked at when I got my results. Living DNA is good for haplogroups as they provide maps with percentages of the population with that haplogroup. They also give a brief summary of the haplogroup.

I am 44% Scandinavian. I was born here in the US. lol I don't care for avatar stuff though. But to each their own. :D

@the11382

3 жыл бұрын

Well, basically everyone in America has some European and African DNA. This includes Native Americans. It’s just intermarriage, from who knows how long ago?

@Catlily5

3 жыл бұрын

@@the11382 I thought people in the USA would be more mixed than the DNA tests have shown so far.

Until very recent history nobody went to Scandinavia because there was no reason, and only the vikings travelled. It was the edge of the world to most people

I'm also Swedish, my results came back 80% Swedish, 14% Norweigan, 5% Finnish and 1% Baltic haha My ancestors clearly didn't move around too much either oops... I'm pretty sure the "Finnish" part is a bit iffy though, cause I know that my grandmas grandmas mom came from there but at that time that region belonged to Sweden haha so on today's map it's Finland but back then the borders were different and we still have old letters and stuff from her and she definitely spoke Swedish! So from what I can tell (we have my grandmas family tree back to the 1600s) that part of the family were actually Swedes who moved there, stayed there for a while and then moved back to Sweden. But it would make sense that I'm related to a lot of Finnish people since I'm sure other parts of that family stuck around in that area even after it became modern Finland. So I'm wondering if that's why I show up as (a small part) Finnish in my results? Cause we probably do have pretty recent DNA overlaps hmmm It's such a big % idk where else it would have come from within the past hundreds of years (both my moms and dads families are from southern Sweden originally so pretty far from Finland)

@moonlily1

3 жыл бұрын

Well, that's what makes your ancestry easy to trace. I've been researching my family tree, and my English and French ancestors went all over the place before they eventually came to America, but my Swedish ancestors kept it Swedish and mostly local, so I can trace them consistently to specific regions and know exactly where they were from. If they moved at all it was only to another town or socken in their municipality.

@professorrhyyt3689

3 жыл бұрын

During the 16th and 17th century quite a lot of finns moved to Värmland, Närke, Västmanland, Dalarna, Hälsingland (roughly). If your family comes from that area you could expext a lot of finnish DNA. They were given Swedish names, and sort of disappeared that way, but they place names in finnish. Search for Finnveden if you want to know more. :)

@erkkinho

3 жыл бұрын

Swedishspeaking Finns are Swedish mostly linguistically and culturally, but Finns genetically.

@Silveirias

3 жыл бұрын

Back in the day when Sweden ruled Finland, there was practically no chance of getting education unless you spoke Swedish and Swedish was otherwise heavily preferred, and the Finnish language was seen as lesser and undesirable, so sometimes natives Finns would end up becoming Swedish speaking over time.

I'm so glad that you do these videos, I truly believe it helps people understand what an amazing thing life is and how mysterious the truth about how we got here and what is going on in general really is. As a physician, I am constantly trying to educate people about the reality of how individual they truly are . They are the only one of themselves that will ever exist, or has ever existed. It's not that somewhere in our genealogical lines there hasn't been someone who looks similar to the way we do, but there has never been an exact replica. Life is precious and you as an individual are a one of a kind jewel in the vast treasure chest of creation.. You are unique, special and should celebrate the amazing gift of your life because there will never be another one like you. The way you break things down in these videos helps people to understand why such things occur like how one person in your immediate family can have certain illnesses and you do not, or why you might have darker hair and your sibling may have lighter hair, or why you are taller and your siblings are shorter. All these differences come about because the gene pool is so vast and so diverse in how it can be constructed, Its complication is a miracle in itself, the idea of intelligent design to ensure a world full of individual people, with individual minds and abilities all meant to exert their talents in their own special way for the greater good of mankind and the Glory Of God. Thank you for your work... it means more than you know.

He's a memer not a genealogical dude. Of course he memes.

Good video! My Maternal Haplogroup is H1 that 1 in 19 «23andMe customers» share it. But my paternal haplogroup G-L30, Only 1 in 5,500 «23andMe customers» share it.

@Mads_Vel

3 жыл бұрын

Ötzi the Iceman had G(L30), does that mean we have a common forefather, maybe he is my great.x dad?

What is interesting about the physical traits results.... imagine the profile you could put together for a criminal whose DNA you captured.... cool..but also scary

I hope they have the definition of scandinavian right. As it is not the same as the nordic countries.

My mother tests 96% Scandinavian/ 92% Swedish and Finnish is the rest. Her whole family is in Sweden.( her parents were the only ones to immigrate) The family is genealogy nerds. 51 generations her mothers side/70 generations on her fathers. It's insane! My sister got 46% percent Scandinavian, 4% Russian. I got the X factor mega load. 24% Scandinavian, 15% English, 10% mix of Latvian and Lithuanian. My mother wondered how that happened, I explained before Vikings raided the British Isles they hit up Lithuania and Latvian first. She still can't wrap her head around the fact that I'm such a low percentage of Scandinavian. I just sigh!

Dude, react to whole ODIN project, and CRISPR. Joseya Zeyner and all.

I'm a European archaeologist and if I ever do one of these tests, it will probably and example of "European history isn't as simple as Americans assume it to be"

Hi from Russia ! Love your videos!

My family has never left the area, lol. My DNA came back 97.6& Finnish. The remaining 2.4% are indigenous Sami. Nothing too exciting.

My 23 and me results were 100% Scots/Irish. I uploaded the same test data to My Heitage and got 62% Scots/Irish/Welsh, 16% English, 16% Scandinavian, 2% East European, 2% West Asian the remaining% "Others". My Heritage has a deeper European data sample and can trace back 1000 years therefore giving a more accurate reading.

It's sad that he can't even be happy about being a pure blooded Viking without worrying people will attack him for it. Everyone else is told to embrace and celebrate their race and culture but white people are told to be ashamed of it, it's not ok.

@carm7518

3 жыл бұрын

If he is 100% Swedish he is not a Viking cause he would see more mixture. Vikings travelled and with travelling mixed with other people

@2KellyJoy

3 жыл бұрын

I agree with you

@JohnSmith-tl8pq

3 жыл бұрын

@@carm7518 That is nonsense. The Viking homelands were Norway, Sweden and Denmark.

@haltdieklappe7972

3 жыл бұрын

@@JohnSmith-tl8pq sweden barely had vikings. Most of the vikings were in Denmark and Norway. Most of the vikings actually settled in the British isles and so the British are the true descendants of vikings. Makes sense considering they created the largest empire ever

@dinamycvideosgaming1597

3 жыл бұрын

@@haltdieklappe7972 varagyans were the vikings of sweden there were a lot but they travelled to eastern europe like finland russia caucasus northern iran etc... onmy sometimes to western europe(british isles)

I'm sure that Finland and Scandinavia are too close genetically to make a clear call between them in many cases. It's a bit like English and Welsh. Sure, if you are majority one or the other the algorithms can likely make the call in most cases, but not if you have a trace mix... i.e. small segment clusters that hint at one or the other.

@nooranen3178

3 жыл бұрын

Actually this is not true. Finnish are genetically very different from most Swedish or Scandinavia. Unless we talk about the very northern areas of these countries. This is why Finnish genetics is easy to spot, because it is very different from all others.

@greenmachine5600

3 жыл бұрын

Actually pretty different. Not like welsh and english lol

@NordenTV

3 жыл бұрын

​@@nooranen3178 It's a complicated matter genetically. Biggest difference may come with paternal dna. Haplogroup N1c is 60% of Finns. And that alone separates Finns from rest of Europe on surface. Maternal lines are similar all across Europe. Percentages varies but still. Finns do have 28% I1a which is the highest number outside of Scandinavians. I1 is considered native to Europe and linked especially to Scandinavians and Proto-Germanic people. Swedes have 37%, Denmark 34%, Norway 31.5% and Iceland 29% After these North-Germany comes highest with 18.5% Finlands other big difference to Europeans is lack of R1b (western europe) and R1a (East Europe, Slavs). Most of I1a origin in Finland is at least 2000 years old so it did not arrive with swedish settlements.

@NordenTV

3 жыл бұрын

Western Finland is quite close yes. Especially if we narrow it down to I1a individuals.

@Aleksandraaaaaaaaaaaa

3 жыл бұрын

This actually not true finns are very different from most europeans especially eastern finns are very far frol scandinavians

23andme correctly identified me as having alpha-1 antitrypsin variant.

Question about paternal haplogroups. My last name is French, the genealogy goes back to Quebec, then France 8 generations ago. My Paternal Haplogroup is I-Y4760 which I've read is much more likely to come from the UK or Doggerland than France. My question is, does this mean a man from the British Iles was in France over 500 years ago who got my last name back then, or does it mean the genealogy around 4-6 generations ago was wrong when a woman said the father was Mr. LeRoy, but actually it was Mr. Stokes? I exported my DNA relatives to a text document which included other basic information about each, did ctrl+f and searched "I-Y4760" around half the people have LeRoy, but the other half have Stokes as the last name. The LeRoys are closest, and when they totally stop around 20centimorgans, the Stokes start at 18centimorgans and keep going. Could this mean a woman 4-6 generations ago lied? Is it a coincidence? Was it actually someone from the Bitish Isles hundreds of years ago in France who got the name? How else could I find out?

@annetoronto5474

3 жыл бұрын

Have you heard about "Home Children" ? www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/immigration/immigration-records/home-children-1869-1930/Pages/home-children.aspx Children from the UK were sent to Canada to work on farms , between 1869 to 1932. Many were sent to Quebec, they were used as free labour, many treated very badly. This might be how you have UK ancestry.

23&me does maternal Hablogroups. Mine is J2a1a

Not the best DNA reaction video, but then I expected nothing less from this guy. He would everything that might have been interesting to look at the stuff that might be true but probably isn't in a lot of cases. Good reaction and deciding if it though as usual.

Thanks Felix, I was afraid I was the whitest person on the planet til now 😂🙈

Yeah could be the site they did the test On my Heritage I had Finish DNA but on Ancestry, I had 0% Finish but when I loaded the same data from Ancestry to My Heritage it again showed Finish. My wife who we know both of her Maternal Grandmother's Parents immigrated from Finland and her test actually did show exactly 25% Finish and she has over 12,000 people currently living in Finland who are matches and even more from other countries where their shared DNA is Finish

It could be that the company whose test he took includes Finland since it is part of Scandinavia.

@Justmemie

3 жыл бұрын

Cant believe i have to say this as often as i have to but no, Finland isnt a part of scandinavia. Scandinavia consist of three countries and three countries ONLY. Sweden, denmark and norway. Finland is a part of the *NORDICS*. They are NOT synonumous and us actual scandinavians would appriciate it if y'all would stop claiming they are.

@kyrpa1625

3 жыл бұрын

finland is not part of scandinavia. plus finns are ethnically distinct from scandinavians, though some finns might have some scandinavian ancestry.

@blackcoffeebeans6100

3 жыл бұрын

@@kyrpa1625 A lot of finns have it.

@blackcoffeebeans6100

3 жыл бұрын

@@Justmemie On some languages scandinavia means Northern Europe. I wish ppl would be as anxious to defend Finland, when ppl think it is a part of Russia.

@Silveirias

3 жыл бұрын

@@blackcoffeebeans6100 No it doesn’t, people just don’t know what Scandinavia means and which countries it includes. Finland is part of the Nordic countries. Geologically it in Fenno-Scandia. Before being identified as a Nordic country, Finland was grouped with the Baltics. And Sweden most certainly did not consider Finland part of Scandinavia and until very recently (as late as 50s/60s even) saw Finns as an inferior race.

Haha, this I why I haven't tested my DNA. I have a pretty large known family tree already and they were ALL Dutch. So will get 100% western Europe or German anyways (most genetic tests don't put Dutch in a category of its own I think)

@rikgales123

3 жыл бұрын

Yea same here, my family never even left Utrecht in 6 generations

Floor gang 🖐😎

12:49 50% thought exactly word for word what he just said before he said it.

I got 98% finnish and 2% mesoamerican in MyHeritage. I think 2% from there is weird... and not have anything else from that part of the world. Also I have build my family tree for 3 years now and all of my relatives are mostly poor finnish peasants.

@rem134

3 жыл бұрын

MyHeritage probably the least accurate of them all. It could just be an error or maybe a great great grand parent has some explaining to do.

@finnvision_

3 жыл бұрын

@@rem134 Yes I believe it’s just an error, bc in Finland it’s typical to get 100% finnish 🇫🇮

@travelelectric8749

3 жыл бұрын

Sami ancestry can mess up results, doesn't seem like the genetic companies have a good database on sami genes.

New subscriber. Love the channel, but given how smart you are you should know that the Scandinavian showing up in Brits will not necessarily work in reverse. Brits have remnant Scandinavian DNA from the Normand conquest. The seemingly strange part is why so much? It should be gone, right? It’s 1000 years ago… this only measures back 500 years at best. It’s because virtually ALL Brits have this remnant Scandinavian DNA. So, it’ll take forever to fade out. But the reverse isn’t true. The Brits never invaded Scandinavia. Scandinavians aren’t likely to get lots of British DNA. Obviously, everyone’s got some surprises in their DNA. I’m sure plenty of Scandinavians have some British in them. But just in terms of likeliness… it’s far, far, FAR more likely that a Brit has Scandinavian DNA than vice versa. I have a large British DNA component. I have no traceable Scandinavian genealogical roots. Yet, depending on which test I use (I’ve done virtually all DNA tests), I’ve got 5-10% Scandinavian DNA. William The Conquerer, baby!!

@GeneaVlogger

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for subbing! I should mention, with genetic genealogy it doesn't necessarily always matter which way the migration happened for the readings to get mixed both ways. As an example, they might determine a certain SNP sequence as from the British Isles because it is so common among Brits but actually it comes from the Scandinavian ancestry. If that happens, people who are fully Scandinavian might get British Isles readings because the company has yet to determine that sequence is Scandinavian and not British Isles.

@millwx

3 жыл бұрын

@@GeneaVlogger Certainly, the DNA analytics could work out that way, but I think you’d agree that that’s incorrect. Saying someone “is” something because there’s a lot of it in that population is not actually correct. So, as DNA analytics improve, I’d think this will get removed. And this video you’re reacting to is quite recent. So, I certainly get what you’re saying… the Scandinavian will be found in almost every Brit, so it could actually be identified as British and, thus, Scandinavians will be identified as part British. I get it, but it doesn’t make it right. Just because Scandinavians invaded Britain doesn’t magically make all Scandinavians Brits. LOL. So, this would be an error in the DNA analytics. A very understandable error, given its prevalence, which is why I say that I understand your point. I could very easily see this occurring, just as you suggested and for the exact reason you suggested. Still doesn’t make it correct. So, I suspect, as the DNA analytics progress, this will get ferreted out. And that may be what we’re seeing here. This test was done recently, so it has the most up to date groupings available. Furthermore, the logic here makes sense. If they can peg Brits as part Scandy, then they are obviously capable of isolating the Scandy DNA from the Brit DNA. So… no… you actually shouldn’t get the reverse. They know and can identify the difference, so the direction of migration actually does matter. Consider North Africa. Many, many, many folks there have Western European DNA. Most Western Europeans do not have North African DNA. That’s because of the direction of the migration (or more so, in that case, the trade). I would 100% agree with you if the mixing of the DNA made one unidentifiable from the other… like the whole French/German mess. But Scandy versus Brit DNA is distinguishable and the migration was (predominantly) one way. So, nope, one should not ever have the expectation that someone of Scandinavian origin will have British DNA signatures. Don’t mean to argue with you here. Love this channel. I subscribe to VERY few channels. I have too many interests. I’d be buried on KZread all day if we’re constantly watching vids from channels I like. I only subscribe to the best. So, I’m not trying to argue. But I also do this semi-professionally (perhaps not to the same level as you, as you advertise yourself as a full-on professional), and I cannot agree with your assertion that the direction of migration doesn’t matter. I’d agree totally if the DNA analytics were unable to separate them (France/Germany), but the very fact that we even have identifiable ethnic groups of British and Scandinavian, separately, proves that the two can be isolated. As such, if migration was mostly unidirectional (as it was in this case), only one group will show the mixture (Brits will have Scandinavian DNA) and not the reverse (Scandinavians will not have Brit DNA). There are many other examples of this. I gave the North African example. The same can be said of Native Americans, especially in Central America (even more so than the US). The Spanish were PROLIFIC in mixing with the Natives. Natives in Central America VERY often have Iberian DNA. How many Spaniards from Spain have NatIve American DNA? Close to zero. The direction of migration matters… *IF* the DNA is discernible (ahem, French/German). Ok, I’m repeating myself now. LOL. Point is simple… no, you should never expect British DNA in a Scandinavian. Never. You should always expect Scandinavian DNA in a Brit. Always. Migration direction matters. And that can be proven through multiple other regional DNA analyses. I’m as surprised as you are that Pewdepie has ZERO mixing at all. But what I’d expect is a little from elsewhere nearby on the continent (central or Eastern European). No Brit? Not a surprise at all.

I would like to ask how you find information a jewish ancestor, if possible on internet, that has lived in Croatia during Holocaust. Mine was not in any camps and we dont even know how he survived the war.

@LilliD3

3 жыл бұрын

You'd probably have to contact the jewish county in Zagreb. They have a list of all Croatian jews since from the 2. world war.

It's like a deck of cards he could get all blacks all reds or a random mix of both.. it's not a 50/50 deck split

@Catlily5

3 жыл бұрын

From your parents it is a 50/50 split but earlier generations it is more like cards.

omg I'm watching this at 8:09 AM.

I think I have to take a test like this just to see. I'm Norwegian and don't know if any family outside of Scandinavia but you never know ☺️

Yeah, according to 23&me says I don't have red hair genes or curly hair genes and well.... my hair goes red when it lightens and if this isn't curly... but I didn't do dna testing for the health stuff, really.... so whatever.

I dunno why your video was recommended to me but did know about Lupita Nyongo DNA result. She is related to mitochondrial Eve.

@rem134

3 жыл бұрын

We are all descendants from the same haplogroups. They just change some over the last 60,000 to 100,000 years.

I got my DNA test back, I uploaded it to gedmatch and used the Eurogenes K13 on it. And suprisingly I am 10% Indoamerican. To the best of my knowlegde we're all swedish on both sides for atleast a coupple generations back.

@the11382

3 жыл бұрын

How about privacy? Remember when it goes wrong, not just your DNA lies exposed, but your family’s as well. Caring about my own DNA, is why I don’t take such tests. I can take such a decision for myself, but not for others.

Can someone tell me if my thinking is right or wrong: The minor percentage ethnicity(s) for a person with no known genealogical ancestors from other regions would mean that there indeed should be an ancestor from that region, not that the population in that "foreign" region has an admixture of your main ethnicity. In the case of PewDiePie´s father: the 8% Finnish should represent a Finn coming to Sweden, supposedly within fairly recent generations. Many Swedes get Finnish ethnicity in their tests results, but there is usually no genealogical fairly recent connection (though some Swedes have Finnish forefathers through the so called forest Finns immigrating to Sweden, but that was back in 16-17th C.)

pretty sure finland is in Scandinavia???

@lillecathrine

3 жыл бұрын

It's not. Scandinavia is only Norway, Sweden and Denmark.

@kyrpa1625

3 жыл бұрын

finland is a nordic country but not a scandinavian country. plus it wouldnt make sense to put finland in the same group with scandinavia in a dna test like 23andme because finns are ethnically distinct from scandinavians.

@Aleksandraaaaaaaaaaaa

3 жыл бұрын

It’s not we are a colpletely different ethnicity

Pewdepie is an interesting person, but none the less his DNA will be cool to see when you show them. Just started watching

@GeneaVlogger, Do you know anything about Middle Eastern Jews from Lebanon/Syria? Especially those who converted to Christianity or the reverse? I have heard of secret Jews in Lebanon that became Orthodox or Maronite Christians. In the last year I have been contacted by 2 people who connected with me on 23 and Me, but are Jewish. I wouldn't be surprised to have have Jewish Ancestry, but neither my 23 and Me or Ancestry show Jewish ancestry.

@rachaeldover5170

3 жыл бұрын

Many Jews pretend to be Christians. Also most Jews were -Morrocon and Arab. Semites used to be darker skinned. Like the rest of humanity. Genetics history evidence and language shows this. Now any race is any religion. There's always been mixing and deceptions for eons.

He doesnt live in Sweden, hes from there but he doesnt live there.

Interesting subject! But just as constructive criticism, I feel like the parts where you don't add a comment or give any kind of reaction are too long. Maybe you could skip a bit of the original video since there's not much to talk about in some parts? And give more info about the subject instead :)

My ethnicity is 97% Scandinavian and 3% Finnish! My nationality is Swedish:) Why are people in the comment section using the word RACE is my question? So disrespectful

Ahm, just a tiny detail - Greece is on the Balkans 😁

Omg finally proof for it happens to me too!!!

100% of swedish meatball

I'm just a mix of a bunch of European so my DNA is probably boring as fuck. That's just how it is and I'm not particularly mad or happy about that.

@blanketparty5259

3 жыл бұрын

Youre a sad individual.

@Sanzianabel

3 жыл бұрын

how is that boring....

@aspannas

3 жыл бұрын

what is that even supposed to mean?

Isn’t Finland included in “Scandinavian” though?

@crazydragy4233

3 жыл бұрын

They’re a completely different group. Not even indo-european.

@blackcoffeebeans6100

3 жыл бұрын

@@crazydragy4233 The language is not, but The race is a different issue.

@Aleksandraaaaaaaaaaaa

3 жыл бұрын

@@blackcoffeebeans6100 finns are kot scandinavian by language nor genes

@Silveirias

3 жыл бұрын

@@blackcoffeebeans6100 There are no human races. Finns are genetically a very distinct group and are different from Scandinavia and the rest of Europe.

It’s rare for someone to be 💯. I’m way more stuff than I ever imagined. Idk 😐 kind of boring just one region 😆

@haltdieklappe7972

3 жыл бұрын

Nothing wrong with being 100% of any ethnicity

@Lily_of_the_Forest

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I think it’s boring to be from 1 country.

I kinda take an dna test but it just a little to expensive for my taste gonna wait till they have a sale. I just hope that if i take it i won't have a high percentage of german

nobody in my family nor extended family has red facial hair, nor green eyes, but while im absolutely related to them and do look very similar to my biological dad (minus him being dark skinned and im not) ive always wondered how that works. if its okay to ask you (this video came on my recccomended and im unfamiliar. both my parents have black hair and brown eyes, and my biological dad has black facial hair. my hair is just brown. how did all this random recession come in?

@rachaeldover5170

3 жыл бұрын

Genetics differences features pop up from any past relative like great aunt etc. So not one family member has exact DNA copy- that would be a clone. So some parts of DNA pass down differently. That's why it's good to find possible more relations if siblings cousins do DNA family tree tests too. But can only find-if DNA matches on ancestry - made public with match- for possible viewing of matches.

I'm expecting this happen to me, since I'm a mix of Sweden, Norway and Finland. I see why I don't watch the pew guy

pewdiepie is more than a gamer

I did a test on Ancestry. My results were England & Northwestern Europe - 42%, Scotland - 33%, Ireland - 14%, Sweden - 5%, Indigenous Americas-North - 4%, Norway - 2%. I was hoping that I would get more Native American than that, but oh well. I knew Scottish and/or Irish would be in there somewhere. Both of my kids are redheads.

@haltdieklappe7972

3 жыл бұрын

Do you live in North Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin or South Dakota?

@Kristen242008

3 жыл бұрын

@@haltdieklappe7972 why?

40% russian , 40% turkmen ,10% iranian, 5% mongol , 4% chinese and 1% scandinavian😂

not vtubing, reverse face reveal

Key word is likely...

Lots of Swedes are mostly scandinavian with some finnish, baltic and european in them, I have: 100% Western Europe Scandinavia 80% Finland 12% Baltic 6%

@haltdieklappe7972

3 жыл бұрын

I am 25% English 37% Scottish 38% German

Whenever people want to talk about Neanderthal genes in their ancestry tests I want to scream (as a paelolithic arch) because of the general % of genes in populations.

So, I may have a Native American in my family but I just did not get any? Also, why would I have African hair and none in my dna?

@Hihihihihihi147

3 жыл бұрын

I think having really curly and dark hair isn't exclusively an african trait. There's many places where people's hair looks like this.

Pat?

So which company is worth the money?

@rachaeldover5170

3 жыл бұрын

Ancestry. Hopefully more trustworthy. It is more for people and truth - anyone could steal ur DNA really. It changes percentage because more people join DNA trees.