Best Other Videos About aircraft carrier : How many people live on an aircraft carrier kzread.info/dash/bejne/hJOczch7acqqlZc.html Why Aircraft Carriers Have an Angled Runway kzread.info/dash/bejne/jKGjyMGOc7ufmZM.html What is the meatball on an aircraft carrier kzread.info/dash/bejne/iop519J7ktbRgKw.html The Evolution of Aircraft Carrier’s Flight Deck kzread.info/dash/bejne/d6RozpiCltWcmNo.html How much is the cost for operational of aircraft carrier kzread.info/dash/bejne/Za6pmMF8nbuzmLg.html How Dangerous It Is to Work at Aircraft Carrier Flight Deck kzread.info/dash/bejne/i4ujsLiio8Wyd9Y.html U.S. Navy Aircraft Carrier Flight Deck Shirt Colors Explained kzread.info/dash/bejne/q31nrs2mnNjYnLA.html The USS Gerald R. Ford Aircraft Carrier Defense Systems kzread.info/dash/bejne/f413urWboaizlLQ.html Can Aircraft Carriers be Protected from Hypersonic Weapons kzread.info/dash/bejne/ln2uk8WJfc7JmbQ.html

I was going to build my own aircraft carrier--but then things got really crazy at work.

@redbug3777

2 жыл бұрын

😆

@JuiceBlack

2 жыл бұрын

Maaaan I hate it when that happens 😔

@BigZebraCom

2 жыл бұрын

@@JuiceBlack I know! think of all the aircraft carriers that won't get built because of overtime?

@sunofpeter2

Жыл бұрын

Quit whining and get busy bro

FINALLY! A solid military channel without a mechanical voice!

Of course that happens only in America 13 billion dollars it worth every penny the best of the best 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸😍💪😉

@redbug3777

2 жыл бұрын

💰🌊

it will be more futuristic if it is protected by a Force Field wrap around it and it has a Cloaking technology

@themc.kennyshow6585

2 жыл бұрын

Lmao can you imagine 😂. Might as well be flying too

@Shammie19

2 жыл бұрын

You're too immature for your age, grow up.

@jeremiahjosefetizanan1417

2 жыл бұрын

It has kinetic projectile force field bubble and electro jamming tech

@cristobalalvarez5491

2 жыл бұрын

@@Shammie19 it's not impossible since theres quantum cloaking already being developed

@DavidPhilipBaldock

2 жыл бұрын

Force fields may not be possible.

This truly is an awesome video. A great presentation. I know that I have tended to think of the defense systems on these aircraft carriers as being the same ones we saw on earlier ships......but, as explained, they are advanced versions that now have greater effectiveness. Thank God for that.

Just made my work week will be listening to these on playlist on next after next in hype love the details

USA has the most modern and biggest aircraft carrier fleet in the world and they are the best,

We have 75 years at sea operating carriers no other nation can match, they are only deployed with a strike group, they are always protected assets. Sometimes we deploy two carriers at once, i feel sorry for anyone stupid enough to attack them. They have missile support 20 times over, the air wing alone is an awesome of weapons systems, Not to mention two submarines at least travels with strike group. The USA would never let anyone threaten there security net those destroyers throw over to protect carrier flanks.

@fleet_plastic

2 жыл бұрын

That’s amazing how much you know!⚓️🇺🇸

@arthas640

2 жыл бұрын

People do downplay the value of experience. The British beat the Germans even though Germany had a decent navy when they entered in WW1 but British experience at ship design, ship building, and fighting at sea lead to Germanys navy being completely crushed. The US has similar experience at shipbuilding with some of our first warships, like Old Ironsides, taking on top of the line european battleships and winning. China has a similar situation as the Germans: giant rapidly developing navy but virtually no experience for the last few hundred years and even before thay theyve never been a real naval power.

@Migman2020

2 жыл бұрын

@@arthas640 Jutland was a failure of the British.. yeah the uk won but we lost a stupid amount of battleships from silly design flaws

@pavelchudy6208

2 жыл бұрын

@@Migman2020 No one British battleship was lost. Only (battle)cruisers. And not because desing flaws (only), but for doubtfull practice let open doors from ammo storages. All for more rapid firing.

@Migman2020

2 жыл бұрын

@@pavelchudy6208 its been well documented about the design flaws and they are classed as battleship/dreadnoughts back then.

you are the best

Those huge sponsons on the aft sides of the flight deck are easily large enough to support tactical length Mk 41 VLS. This would allow the Ford to counter saturation attacks that get past her escorts.

@cristobalalvarez5491

2 жыл бұрын

Doesn't it add more weight

@themc.kennyshow6585

2 жыл бұрын

@@cristobalalvarez5491 it's already 100,000 tonnes bro 😂

@Jermo7899

Жыл бұрын

That’s what the escorts are for. I have wondered why they never carried a few missiles. But this can withstand a lot of hits. You need a nuclear or ballistic missile with a direct hit to bring it down. With the speed it can move and maneuver it would be next to impossible to hit it

Great USA!

Awesome 👍

This Canadian who was an American Twice in Past lives loves this ! 156 years ago 718 Miles South Of Hawk Island aka Montreal even served in the US MILITARY......Calling All US Servicemen and women to Pushups with Dragon For World Peace. Love it !

I love it

nICE!

Let's be honest here, The carrier it self can intercept like 1 missile... It highly relies on it's strike group.

@Justineexy

2 жыл бұрын

@Varangian Guard True. Not all though, the Kuznetsov is different, Although it's old, Sitting in dock and most likely costing a bizillion pounds, it's still More capable in terms of Defensive capabilities.

@dwain415

2 жыл бұрын

Even IF that is true, don't forget that the ship with be loaded with fighter jets and helicopters for defense also.

@pauljackson9521

2 жыл бұрын

India's INS Vikrant (42000 tons) carrier has 64 Barak 8 interceptor missiles so I believe that 100k tons of ford class must have more than that number of missiles. So they aren't always dependent on escorts for defense.

@HeroOfXanadus

2 жыл бұрын

on what facts?

@cedriceric9730

2 жыл бұрын

The plan is give it megawatt lasers Then it will be the one "protecting" it's battle group😎😎

I know they usually have other ships with them but if feel safer with a few more Ciwis platforms on either side of the deck

Is the CIWS located on the front, rear, and both sides (for complete coverage)???

مصر هي الاولى ورئيس العالم عندها احدث من جيبي كثير حاملات طائرات فوق مانع يتخيلها الفكر والعلم.

God I love being a military nerd

@fleet_plastic

2 жыл бұрын

Same here! Even wanting to join!

@themc.kennyshow6585

2 жыл бұрын

@@fleet_plastic I'm in the UK. And no not really. I would prefer to serve in something like armed/firearms police

@grummanf14tomcat40

2 жыл бұрын

@@fleet_plastic im going to join the Us Navy when im old enough. I am not from the US tho, and the reason i dont want to join my country's navy is because its... lets just say its not strong enough to defend our country.

I'm a m.w gamer and I operate the USS Gerald R FORD I'm so empresses the aircraft carrier it become my favorite ship

The naval designation "MK" is short for "mark" and is pronounced as such.

It would be better if they include the Israel C-DOME missile

アメリカが強力な空母を持っていると我々日本人も安心できますね

23 rd second

5:06-There's a VLS for ESSM that I've seen on some foreign warships, why are we still using the Mk29?

@phinix250

2 жыл бұрын

either range related (in sea skimming mode, you don't want to waste fuel launching up to clear the ship) or more likely it is so it does not interfere with air operations, a VLS could prevent a takeoff or landing until the exaust has cleared from the deck.

Yay, now we have 13 active carriers… you know, the carries that eat up a fuck ton of our military and national budget.

@cristobalalvarez5491

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah but provides long range support

Sama kek digame modern warship 👍

We need to take old aircraft carriers and put vertical cells on it for really long range missile's just think instead of tearing the older ships apart costs a lot and all you have to do is refuel the aircraft carriers with large long range anti-ship missile's and others into vertical launch tubes and there you have a way to take out Chinese ground based anti-ship missile's launchers out before you take the carrier group close enough to get into the battle

Why does EMALS emit steam during cat launch of aircraft?

First

Will the carries be able to defend itself against hypersonic missiles?

@aintnobodycare6193

2 жыл бұрын

I feel like the LAaWS Laser system can track and kill a hypersonic missile because of hit scan targeting

@Thetequilashooter1

2 жыл бұрын

Hypersonic missiles can still be jammed and spoofed, as well as use decoys, chaff, etc. Plus, there’s some doubt that Russia and China really have such weapons as they’re both known for overhyping their capabilities. Neither has actually shown a hypersonic missile in flight for more than just a few seconds, and the US x-51 Waverider broke the world record for hypersonic duration of flight, and that was over a decade ago. What is not surprising is that Russia copied it to make their Zircon missile.

@ThatCarGuy

2 жыл бұрын

Hypersonic missiles aren't used on moving targets as hypersonic missiles can not maneuver in their terminal phase as they are moving to quickly and would miss their target, I can post the Russian patent if you would like.

It may be futuristic, but it still doesn't mean its technology will fully work. I'm still quite worried about the electromagnetic elevators. I've heard they're quite fragile.

@johnwalker984

2 жыл бұрын

And I read the new aircraft launching system is sketchy too

@jeramysteve3394

2 жыл бұрын

@@johnwalker984 all new tech has this problem. It'll take some testing to iron out some of the kinks

Drone swarm might overwhelm it

$13 billion dollars........GEEEEEEZ ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!! I remember when a carrier was astronomical at ONE-billion dollars and ALL of it's support ships added up to an additional billion dollars. Two billion dollars for an entire battle group. And people were having fits about THAT.

That carrier is ready to be seaborn and defending the rest of the fleet as well as launch aircraft to destroy air and ground targets.

When will USS BONE SPURS get launched

@tq6407

2 жыл бұрын

When the uss bunker Biden is, with 5 deferments

@classicgalactica5879

2 жыл бұрын

TDS Alert! 🤪🤪🤪🤪

First up!

@timmcpherson9632

2 жыл бұрын

My rewards 👉🏻🏅🥇🏆

@iaeurmamaspousay

2 жыл бұрын

Ur second

OK-----------. Unless the 20mm Seawiz is upgraded with at least a 35mm gun with proximity rounds if not true target seeking smart rounds effective out to 2+ miles they should be replaced by the SeaRam launchers that can reach out and kill missiles over 5-miies away instead of just the last 1,000 meters "hopefully"!!! The Sea Wiz has been demonstrated to be worthless against supersonic Missiles with its short range of 1,000-meters against a maneuvering missile moving kilometers a second. Though the SeaRam mounts with only 11 rounds should get a reloader that takes less than an hour to reload missiles. Preferable less than a minute... Using a rack of missiles close by in a deck house or below deck that is ready to slide out or lift up to the launchers Missile box to push missiles into any vacant tubes in the Box in one easy push, 11missiles could be reloaded in seconds with the box reloader reloaded quickly in the nearby magazine instead of crates of 4 (with storage crates of 4, most launchers are only loaded with 8 missiles (instead of 11) as loading only 3 missiles from a crate leaves the ODD missile unprotected and awkward returning it to the magazine, if the launcher is fully loaded) hauled up from deep inside the ship on forklifts and elevators, broken open, missiles inspected and finally slide into each launch tube one at a time with the help of a crane and alignment bar. A Job that is almost impossible in Combat, bad weather, a rolling ship, with most launchers mounted high up away from the main deck. Almost as bad as trying to load the Sea Wiz... When Chinese Missile are flying at the Fleet by the hundreds in waves, only having 11 Rams to destroy stragglers is just Pitiful... Almost as bad as having only 21 in the stand alone mount that usually only gets 20 rounds loaded, again to prevent hauling a partially empty crate back down to the Magazine... (regs prevent moving or storing a missiles outside their shipping crates without approved racks in unprotected areas). Just easier not to bother filling the launcher.

so only drones what about jets/planes etc?... i hope it could float when it gets hit

@ThatCarGuy

2 жыл бұрын

"The U.S. Navy knows this from experience. In 2005, the Navy itself targeted the decommissioned carrier America in order to determine just how much punishment the vessel could withstand before slipping beneath the waves. "The ship was pummeled by explosions both above and below the waterline," The War Zone reporter Tyler Rogoway explained in 2018. "After nearly four weeks of these activities, the carrier was scuttled. On May 14, 2005, the vessel's stern disappeared below the waterline and the ship began its voyage to the seafloor." "America stood up to four weeks of abuse and only succumbed to the sea after demolition teams scuttled the ship on purpose once and for all, it's clear that America was built to sustain heavy damage in combat and still stay afloat."

It's in multi-million millions dollar repair and routine exoensive maintenance already after a brutal test that almost crack the carrier. It's planned for deployment in 2022 if lucky. The 4 year delay. For sure, Gerald Ford won't be an invincible flat top carrier, meaning it's sinkable by enemy hypersonic all out.

Why tell everyone? Our enemies don’t have KZread channels to explain their militaries.

What about drones. Other than its planes it can utilize drones with its defense

Why doesn’t the US just make there own DF-21 and test it themselves too see the damage it can create? China pulled a smart one with the ship missile though.

@cedriceric9730

2 жыл бұрын

They did and the carrier, that very ford carrier survived:) USN doesn't careless about the df21 ,worst case scenario they can to shoot it down but most likely China will never find the battle group Unless the USA is displaying it

@ThatCarGuy

2 жыл бұрын

The DF missile is propaganda, moving at hypersonic speeds missiles can not maneuver in their terminal stage especially at moving targets as the missile is moving so fast it would miss it's target if it tried to maneuver.

@death_parade

2 жыл бұрын

DF-21 is not a threat to US carriers given their carriage of a full fledged two-tier shield of BMDs comprising SM-3 and SM-6. I am more worried about Indian Carriers (till they introduce AD-1 and AD-2 missiles) and British carriers (till they introduce Aster-30 BMD version).

Ummm…I’m pretty sure this a breach in OPSEC!

i seriously doubt more than 1 Nimitz Class CV will be kept as a museum, too large to expensive to keep, 1 would be a miracle to be kept, if any, Breakers im afraid

LAST HOPE OF AMERICA FRONT CARRIERS.... PH HERE

Does the ship is equiped with System to counter hypersonic missile Batteries to counter anti ship missile System to counter air to ship missile Anti submarine torpedo Long range ship to air / land/ ship missiles

@1563ckg43

2 жыл бұрын

Like all carriers in all countries it has an air wing and a couple of missile boats and it’s basic defense. No Carrier in the world waits around to see if it is going to get hit or not. Once an offensive attack and trek is confirmed both offensive/defensive measures are in progress. Speed and maneuvers are increased.

🇺🇸 $13 billion for an Aircraft carrier?? 😳

@aqsunqar

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, its normal price. Forexample Nimith class aircraft carriers costs around 8-9 billion $.

@aqsunqar

2 жыл бұрын

USS Gerald. R. Ford used a new type of catobars.

@jonseilim4321

2 жыл бұрын

INS Vikrant with its complement cost around 9 billion USD

@raymondazadgoli5425

2 жыл бұрын

I hate to say it but that's cheap given what we pay for other stuff

@aqsunqar

2 жыл бұрын

@@jonseilim4321 INS Vicrant=Reward of Corruption:)

Do aircraft carriers have bathrooms or toilets?

@waleedali9393

2 жыл бұрын

That's the most intelligent question i ever see in my life

@rockdirty2228

2 жыл бұрын

You've got the WHOLE OCEAN you're sailing in. Just do your business over the side. Do I have to say /s? Yep, I probably do...

@robbob9273

2 жыл бұрын

Nope they use wooden seats that hook to the top rails, then poop over the edge. When the public is looking they just shit in a bucket and throw it over board when no one is watching.

@cedriceric9730

2 жыл бұрын

They wait till they are back at port

@thefoundingtitanerenyeager2345

Жыл бұрын

Yes their is bathrooms in fact some of their toilets cost up to $400,000

If us carrier group face the hypersonic missile barrage for sure it cant defend

@exoblaze5226

2 жыл бұрын

That’s almost any ship in the world most likely no ship could survive that.

@ThatCarGuy

2 жыл бұрын

Hypersonic missiles aren't used on moving targets do to the fact missiles moving at hypersonic speeds can't maneuver in their terminal phase as they are moving too fast. I can link the Russian patent if you would like.

Imagining a helicopter getting twerked by a CIWS. There’d be nothing left of the helicopter, its pilots, anything really. All mincemeat

How will it's defences fare against 1000 , $2000.00 Iranian drones?

@Joshua-dt5vi

Жыл бұрын

The carrier and it's escorts will neutralize the threat

How To US Save $13 Billion Aircraft Carrier From Sinking! That was your title? How to US Save? what does that mean. If you cannot get the title correct what hope is there for the video?

What even is a mile?

@thefoundingtitanerenyeager2345

Жыл бұрын

5,280 feet

Having just a few missiles for the defense of the carrier is woefully deficient as in a real shooting war the enemy will be shooting dozens of missiles against it. The ship defense is pitifully deficient (by design?).

@oculosprudentium8486

2 жыл бұрын

@@piepile6328 On a side note, although the VLS system is efficient for storing the missile on these modern boats, but reloading can only be done at the shipyards. There are some newer missiles that are designed to be smaller and can loadout 4 to a cell, but they tend to be much shorter ranger missiles as a factor of their tiny size. When I see the Russian stuff and they load their S300 & S400 missiles in rotary magazines below deck, it makes our stuff look tiny in comparison.

@jaimearredondo787

2 жыл бұрын

It’s always next to four destroyers and 2 cruisers the Arleigh-Burke and Ticonderoga cruisers also 1-2 attack submarines

@jaimearredondo787

2 жыл бұрын

Together that’s over 1300 missiles

@oculosprudentium8486

2 жыл бұрын

@@piepile6328 True, but the main point is that the carrier is the biggest target for the enemy and thus it's protection should be proportional to its value, right? A modern peer enemy won't be attacking with 2 or 3 but salvoes of dozens at a time. Plus the huge flaws of modern warships is that to save space they all use the VLS system. After the missiles are expended they have to return to a specific port to reload as it cannot be done manually at sea

@oculosprudentium8486

2 жыл бұрын

@WL2020 Actually I am! However, I tend to always be independent in my analysis. Being American does not mean always supporting the USA side, if that's your definition. If you cant bear to bring yourself to say that your side is deficient or could do things better does not mean that you are not Patriotic to your country.

How would the carrier be able to defend against something purely kinetic? ICBM armed with a tungsten rod of doom dropped from high altitude? I feel like i just disarmed the whole us fleet. Bigbrain time

@jonathanryan9946

2 жыл бұрын

Well something on the kinetic attack still needs to guide it to its target. So another kinetic weapon could damage it, plus slow it down/knock it off course. A laser could just burn it to pieces, or absolutely destroy its aerodynamics so it'd just wildly fly off course. Now, in fairness, I don't think cwis will stop it though and explosive missiles might not have as much stopping power against it as a kinetic missile.

The island is small. Give more space for runway compare to Indian carrier the island is huge eating lots of runway space

@death_parade

2 жыл бұрын

You mean in the Vikrant? Bruh, Vikrant has a 64-cell VLS Barak-8 in that island. And its still better optimized than that carrier the Russians sold us.

@kumarandisamy7468

2 жыл бұрын

@@death_parade make it small like the American and reduce the G spot. If in future make it two island

@death_parade

2 жыл бұрын

@@kumarandisamy7468 Why? Why two islands? What do you mean by "reduce G-spot"?

A new carrier plus planes, bombs and a year or two of operating costs adds up to roughly $15 billion. Assuming nukes aren't used, can a carrier even do $15 billion worth of damage? Can it carry enough conventional bombs to do even $1 billion worth of damage? The lethality per dollar -- bang for the buck -- seems terrible. I understand carriers were crucial in the pacific in WWII but carriers cost so much less in the 1940s that they made more sense then. No longer. Is anyone in the Navy asking these big questions in a serious way?!

@Tealice1

Жыл бұрын

ATGMs haven't made the tank obsolete, AShMs will not make carriers obsolete.

' oh no... stop watch at 005... not important to put the currencys in here... american shipyard must build many more better bigger powerful aircraft carriers... american aircraft carrier must have a ramp up... not flat floor

SERA FACILMENTE DESTRUIDO

You guys need another 40 Nimitz class carriers this year or china womt be beaten in 4 days

Waste of money which could be used e.g. to give americans a better and more human health system.

Hear that China, it take generations to learn how to operate an aircraft carrier 😆

@gspotmop8242

2 жыл бұрын

Impeach Biden!😁

@es10_

2 жыл бұрын

@@gspotmop8242 what

@johnc9546

2 жыл бұрын

@Larry Bone I guess you forgot about Korea? How arrogant of you. Never, ever underestimate your opponent because that is when you get your ass handed to you.

@weiguan4518

2 жыл бұрын

@Larry Bone The Korean War, the forgotten war

Uploads it* China: welp we gonna do a chinese version of this one

@thefoundingtitanerenyeager2345

Жыл бұрын

All the information about the nuclear reactor inside of it is completely classified that’s probably why China has all diesel boats lmao 😂

Imagine the name if Nixon didnt make do watergate and Ford didn't take over his presidency

US: hey we have the world's bestest weapons systems on our Aircraft Carriers! China and Russia: hey we have the world's best Aircraft Carriers destroying weapons "The Boost Glide Hypersonic missiles systems". So, hold my beers boy!

What about the CCP and Russian hypersonic missiles?

Try it. USA has never been in a war.

Пссссс....🗽💥🚀 👈😀??🌟🚩🌟

Swedish submarines don't care.

@JM-gj7de

2 жыл бұрын

Obviously, you have no idea what you're talking about.

@RoyBrown777

2 жыл бұрын

@@JM-gj7de A single swedish sub destroyed an entire US task force and an aircraft carrier in 2005.

@exoblaze5226

2 жыл бұрын

@@RoyBrown777 that was training never go of training it’s way easier to mess up in the heat of the battle.

@Thetequilashooter1

2 жыл бұрын

@@RoyBrown777 I never heard that it was the entire carrier group, just the carrier. Why do you think the US requested the Gotland to stay in the US for two additional years? To train against and learn how to defend against subs like it.

@death_parade

2 жыл бұрын

Training simulation and actual combat is different.

Fake Video.

The British aircraft carrier has crap self defence weapons system on it it only has 3 cwis systems a joke.

@death_parade

2 жыл бұрын

Meanwhile in India: 64 cell VLS Barak-8 guided by 6 panel GaAs AESA plus 4X 76mm SRGM and 4X Ak-630 CIWS

Ból dupy Putina

Seems to me sharing this information is the act of traitors

TIAGO FIRETI LEXUS DIAMANTE FOTO PERFIL KZread 🇧🇷🥇

First

@mikegrazick1795

2 жыл бұрын

Frist reply!!