I happily agree with all these points. Let’s make the EU more democratic, more transparent and more fair.

@NoobsDeSroobs

20 күн бұрын

And less intrusive. Stop trying to make EU acountry, please.

Great video 👏🏻

@Ciceroni1

20 күн бұрын

Thanks!

Great video. This is the future.

The problem is that treaty change requires unanimity. So changing the treaties to stop Hungary from abusing unanimity will be next to impossible. We basically have to hope for a change in government in Hungary and for them to cooperate if such a veto removal can go through.

@telotawa

22 күн бұрын

how about every country except hungary (+ the other undemocratic ones) form a new treaty, creating a "new" european union and leaving the old one behind, just as a legal loophole to kick them out?

@Ciceroni1

21 күн бұрын

@@telotawa Interesting thought! Maybe somewhat similar to the idea of a Union with different speeds/integrations. Some countries have adopted the Euro, others haven't. You could say that the same would be possible for many other improvements.

@lukeporras1288

20 күн бұрын

⁠@@telotawa That’s essentially how the U.S. got around the unanimity requirement in the Articles of Confederation to adopt the more centralized, majoritarian Constitution they have now. They just made a new Constitution that left out any State that rejected it, and the resulting fear of being left out led all the states to eventually ratify it anyway

Very interesting proposals! I think they are very rational, although I wonder if a collective presidency might be better. I have in mind something like the Swiss model (although strictly filling the functions of head of state, not head of government). The EU is very diverse, so it might be hard to find just one bloke who can serve as the embodiment of the Union (plus, having the head of state be collective would fit the motto of *In varietate concordia* very well)

@Ciceroni1

21 күн бұрын

Thanks! And indeed not easy to find someone who represents us all. At the same time, we don't seem to mind what nationality a person has when we admire the same pop stars, football players and the like, so who knows ;)

Which EU party represent this ideals? I would like to vote for members of these ideas.

@tremen2140

22 күн бұрын

It is Volt - sadly within each country their manifestos do take stances on politically charged issues other than structural EU reform which can make them unappealing to a section of their potential voters.

@Ciceroni1

21 күн бұрын

We have a short video on Volt as well. For more information about them, you can visit their website:) kzread.info/dash/bejne/gGyI2bWKndqdaLA.html

@FreeAssange_hypeurope

21 күн бұрын

Volt

Ah yes take away all the sovereignty of individual states...I'm sure this will end well...

@Ciceroni1

20 күн бұрын

One could argue that without an EU the sovereignty of these countries would be rather limited. How much can a single small country keep to its own rules against large powers like the US or China?

Independent broadcast is a seriously good idea. For me i rely on "eu made simple".

@Ciceroni1

21 күн бұрын

EU Made Simple is a great channel indeed! But what a pity that these channels don't get proper funding from the EU like other media outlets...

A national perspective is bad because it is small. European perspectives are good because they are bigger. What logic is that? Further, why stop there? Take a global or galactic perspective, to be future proof.

@Ciceroni1

20 күн бұрын

Galactic does sound good. But maybe because I like Star Wars:)

@NoobsDeSroobs

20 күн бұрын

@@Ciceroni1 The criticism I had and tried to express was that the scope of Europe being superior was stated as a given when I would have wanted some justification for that claim. So far it seems arbitrary to fit the arguments being made.

@Ciceroni1

20 күн бұрын

Of course having all of this on a global (or galactic) scale would of course be better. However, while doing all this on an EU level already is difficult to achieve, going even further is even more difficult. So while not necessarily superior it is more achievable. Wouldn’t you agree?:)

Although I would personnaly like to see an european confederal state I must say this essay is just filled with ideals that can never be achieved. The original point of the ECSC was to stop war between the original member states. The European states, currently at least, are too different to be able to achieve everything this video dreams of. The power of the union is its differences. And as these countries are only binded by treaties, and in international law that means countries are only bound political reality. European intergration is a process that will happen over time. But forcing smaller member states to give up their sovereignty by limiting the commissioners and the european council to a select few seats will not work. This will result in the bigger states having all the power, and thus the smaller countries would lose theor bargaining chips. There are at least two things that the Union should focus on, if it could ever achieve such unity: one common army, and the staye sponsord independent news.

@lukeporras1288

20 күн бұрын

As a non-European observer, I would agree. The “European Senate” idea is fair, but its decisions should still at least be made by supermajority vote. This would largely uphold the principle of consensus government that the EU is founded on, while ensuring that one or two mischievous actors can’t stall the whole process. Still, I think these EU-centralizer people need to recognize the value of consensus government. For such an extraordinarily diverse place, all interests big or small need to be respected, and all sovereigns need to have a say.

Next video: who TF asked

@Ciceroni1

21 күн бұрын

That wouldn't be a very interesting video I'm afraid...