"If you were going to get a hundred on the exam, you wouldn't be watching this video" OUCH, LOL. I know its the truth, but still... ouch.

@giorgibujiashvili3942

6 жыл бұрын

can confirm, can't get a hundred. will report back once the test is done.

@kev814445

6 жыл бұрын

It made the video more interesting...your humor was greatly appreciated during this stressful time :-)

@Miraclefruitify

5 жыл бұрын

@@richardma3187 Jeez, chill bruh. It's just a joke

@ajimatsmail5686

5 жыл бұрын

Teu ngarti aing bngst:(

@ashishdaniel169

5 жыл бұрын

@@giorgibujiashvili3942 still waiting for that report

Thank you so much! This was an immense help and I wasn't able to find such a straightforward explanation anywhere else.

woah woah I didn't ask to be personally attacked watching a youtube tutorial video lmao

The best video i've seen discussing this topic so far!

@gloriaxiaoluzhang4430

7 жыл бұрын

agree!

@danteeep

6 жыл бұрын

I'm subscribing cause he nailed it

This was the best explanation ever. Why couldn't my professor break it down this simply. Thanks for this video.

Thank you so much. I definitely wouldn't be able to graduate without youtube. I'm glad I'm studying university at this decade :D

You're a legend. Best video about IEEE-754 on youtube.

Thank you, Steven, it help me to understand IEEE 754 much more better than others!

In case someone is wondering why there is a need to use bias. It is to make fast magnitude comparison of floating point numbers possible in hardware. By using a bias we are effectively avoiding the need to store the exponent as negative numbers. If we had allowed the exponent to be stored as negative number (probably as a 2's complement), then during the occasion when there is a need to compare two exponents of two FP numbers, we need to obtain the magnitude of the 2's complement representation of the exponent by performing the 2's complement (need CPU cycles) operation (this is how you obtain the magnitude of a negative number represented in 2's complement form. If the number was represented in sign magnitude form, bits other than the sign bit would have directly given the magnitude) So if there is a bias, we can just forget about the negatives and just compare the bits of two exponents and say which one is larger.

@stevenpetryk6869

5 жыл бұрын

Good to know! Thank you for sharing this.

Thanks a bunch! Very helpful, straight forward and clear. Other videos try to explain the concepts behind them too but that just confuses people.

love your way of explaning mate, i think you meant the only way to score 100 is to watch your video ;)

@madhurjyadeka5569

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah who does that lol😂😂😂

That video will help me to get 100/100 on exam. Thanks from Poland

Saving me for my final exams mate, thank you.

this saved my ass before an exam, great video

this is the BEST explanation of floating point!!! thank you Steven!

Definitely the best 'pencil-pen' i've seen.

I wish you were my Comp Org TA! :-D You're delightful, and your videos are outstanding.

Ma boi steven roasting these kids expecting him to be perfect, love it

woah, very helpful, thank you so much :) literally couldn't find anything else anywhere else online

awesome explanation, quite short and totally clear

Thanks for your video Man, very helpfull really. Im watching you from France, keep going

Very helpful and well explained. Thanks!

you might have just saved my finals thanks

The best Video I've ever seen about that

WHOA... when some guy out of a billion in the internet you've searched is using the same pencil as you.... pffssshhh MIND BLOWN!

Very clear explanation! Thanks alot!

Watching this from India- there's like hundreds of tutorial vids on this topic from Indian channels and none is half as good as this one. Thanks a lot sir :D

Outstanding, thank you for this

Thanks Bro!!!! You helped myself. I'm Brazilian spectator.

You are AWESOOOOOME ! 10/10

Good for you! What university do you TA for? I wish our TAs did that for us too. :)

Excellent explanation

9:58 that arrow is sooooo smooth!

Best video bro.. Thank you so much 🙂🙂👍👍👍

You saved my life dude !

Wonderfully explained 😅

Amazing, thank you so much

really appreciate the video

thank you man your the best !!!

got 100% thanks to this video

ditching my professor's video in favor of some random guy on youtube -seriously though, thank you for making this easier to understand

Watched this for my exam today, no way you had the right to drag me like that😭 1:17

Thanks Steven 👍

SUPER HELPFUL

You sir are awesome

Thank you so much

What would I search for to find a video explaining the math behind that nifty little technique he's using to get the binary (the multipying with two table)? I'm not in computer science in case you wondered. ;)

Dude, ty you so much!

Steven, when recording the results at the end, on the mantissa, why didn't you consider the fact that 1100 is repeating?

Thanks!

Thank you.

I know this video has been some years ago, but do u have a video with fractions? :O

thank you

nice vid!

Thanks bro!

Thanks

"If you were going to be getting 100% on the exam, you wouldn't be watching this video." Out here sayin what every TA wants to say, hope you're doin well.

Man you saved my ass. Can you make a video for double precision?

nicly explained

So, what if the fractionary part process ends up without a repeating cycle? How many digits should i take as a result? Example: for 0.01

@Oreoezi

Жыл бұрын

Usually the question will specify, most professors would be ok with doing it 6-7 times. Theoretically you'd have to do it until all 52 bits are filled.

Can you make a video for a negative decimal? Like (-4.75)???

what if 'E' negative?

Hey, nice Video realy!

Karrrrdeşimmm biliyorsun bu hayatı

finally someone who speaks english

Heyy Steven, what if it is a negative decimal

thanks

Why does the IEE754 converter here puts a 1 at the end? because of rounding? www.h-schmidt.net/FloatConverter/IEEE754.html thanks for the video by the way :)

thanks! my exam is tomorrow :~)

Which textbook do you recommend?

How did you get the binary of 132? I don't get it:((( help

@samannoysingha5259

Ай бұрын

Just like how he gets the binary value of 45 😊

Hello, Can you help me on this one -0.045625(ten) to binary? I tried doing it your way. But I'm trying to do it without calculator since our professor don't allow it. Can you show me?

Are you the voice behind Casually Explained?

@ProductionsOfPauls

7 жыл бұрын

I was thinking the same thing haha

@halio8012

6 жыл бұрын

He even makes the same jokes... How many channels does this guy have???

Bravo

Pencils are important. Indeed!😊😊

What if the mantissa wouldnt be repetetive. Would you just fill the last bits with 0's?

@Preposter

5 жыл бұрын

Yes

Is this CasuallyExplained?!

god bless you

Hey Steven great video, but does the exponent always equal 132? What is the significance of the 5 and the 132 , thanks EDIT Nevermind just got it lol

@exoxDiD

7 жыл бұрын

wait I still don't ;;

@sorrefly

6 жыл бұрын

The exponent is coded in excess 127, so you just add 127 to the value of the actual exponent 5 + 127 = 132 keep in mind while converting back from iee754

@exoxDiD

6 жыл бұрын

thanks a lot! I get it now

@sorrefly

6 жыл бұрын

jongup__ no problem :)

my professor makes a test with more exercises (110%) than usual but in the same amount of time with the amount of exercises for 100% so that more students can hit 100% :)

Brilliant thanks. How would you convert a number like 0.0000000025 to IEEE 754?

ok how to convert 0.0059 any help

hello , i dont get last three 1100,why you add?okay you want to get 23 bit ,but why 1100?

THANK YOU MY PROFESSOR COULDN'T EXPLAIN THIS FOR SHIT

Thank you so much! I'm struggling a lot to understand this but you definitely made it easier. I was trying to convert -0,75 to binary and I did this: 0,75 * 2 = 1,50 0,5 * 2 = 1,00 When I get only 1.0 I need to stop. So my number would be 0.11 so 1.1 * 2 ^ -1 1.1 * 2 ^126 0 | 01111110 | 100000000000000 Is this logic correct?

@Staroo

3 жыл бұрын

Yh, but your original number was negative so your sign bit would be 1 instead of 0

@nicoli108

3 жыл бұрын

@@Staroo thank you!

thank u so much lol

Omg , thank you so much.

How is 5 equal to 132?

@0fficialRatedR

6 жыл бұрын

he added to 127

@opatechnus

6 жыл бұрын

what he converted to binary and how

@puskalpulami8246

6 жыл бұрын

at first, he just added exponent(i.e, 5) with 127. And their sum is 132. Then he converted 132 (132 is decimal numbers) to binary numbers.

why have you not 127 for mantisa

what if the we have something like -0,123

Very "encouraging" words.

5:45 - 5:51 #BRAINinitiative Move from #Wired to Wireless IEEE’s MultiDisciplinary approach could do it...Wonder, what is their Motivation? @Outcomes_Matter

one question if i have a negetive number like for example -18,125 should it be represented in complement 2??

Huge thanks ..man..u deserve more than that...maybe a pizza

What is going on with the exponent ^5? How did you convert it to 132 (1000 0100)?

@stevenpetryk6869

3 жыл бұрын

I added 127. The physical register represents numbers as 127 higher than the actual exponent value. So if the flip-flops in the computer show 1000 0100, the actual mathematical exponent it’s representing is 132-127 = 5

@rickthebrick12

3 жыл бұрын

@@stevenpetryk6869 if my exponent comes out to be 3, I would add 3 + 127 = 130?

@stevenpetryk6869

3 жыл бұрын

@@rickthebrick12 If you're going from paper -> electricity, you add 127. If you're going from electricity -> paper, you subtract. For a mathematical exponent of 3, the bits in the register would be 3 + 127 = 10000010₂.

@anilkadiyala

3 жыл бұрын

If Paper (decimal) to Ieee , then map ur math into this 1.M * 2^(E-127). Evaluate M and E , later arrange them as S E M. That’s it

"If you were going to get 100 on this exam, you wouldn't have to watch this video. Anyway-" 1:23. Did not need to do us like that my man

Shouldn't the exponent have the value 6

my number is 454.125 and when i started converting the second part (0.125) it stopped at a whole 1 so it went like this: 0.125 * 2= 0.25 0.25 * 2=0.50 0.50 * 2=1 did I do it wrong?

@stevenpetryk6869

3 жыл бұрын

No, you’re right. 0.125 is represented as 0.001 in binary (2^-3 = 1/8). You’ll notice that if you continued you’d just get more and more zeroes: 0.50 * 2 = 1 0 * 2 = 0 0 * 2 = 0 Which is the same as just adding more zeroes to any decimal number’s decimal side: like how 10 = 10.0000 (ignoring precision, which computers don’t usually encode ). So your number in binary is (I think-doing the math on my phone right now): 1 1100 0110.001

@kareemashouri1429

3 жыл бұрын

@@stevenpetryk6869 I actually did not get the same answer my binary number came out too: 011000111.001

@stevenpetryk6869

3 жыл бұрын

@@kareemashouri1429 if you Google “454 in binary” you’ll see that something went wrong with your conversion. I’d recommend trying again.

"If you were going to get 100 on this exam, you wouldn't be watching this video" way to be discouraging lol

@stevenpetryk6869

2 жыл бұрын

Don’t take it too seriously! I made this video to help my students get 100’s :)

why you repeated that loop of binary fraction representation at the matisse case , normally you should complete the mantisse result by zeros !!