Keerthi has a problem with everything, except with her jingoism. She's a 'problem child' ! 😂

Keerthi is like a female avatar of Praveen Mohan.

@user-vu5xs1pz2l

Ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@akashshukla7

Ай бұрын

🤣🤣yaad dila di tumne uski, abhi dekhta hun kya chal rha h uske channel pe

@akashshukla7

Ай бұрын

bhai abhi dekha, uske videos ki length ab 45min ke aas paas ho gayi hai, launda kafi mehnat kar rha h

@akashshukla7

Ай бұрын

hey, do you think Praveen Mohan has a fake accent?

@akashshukla7

Ай бұрын

Humko lagta hai Praveen ka pura game foreigners ko attract karne ka hai, tabhi toh channel ka revenue badhega

Keerthy History is the Reason I subscribed to Vimoh 😂😂

@piposcat

Ай бұрын

Lol yeah. I love seeing people diss her.

@hasanraghib

Ай бұрын

Yes, we're in the same boat 😄 the first video I watched of Vimoh was about her

@tejasa8429

Ай бұрын

Even this guy is lier and he is also biased

@tejasa8429

Ай бұрын

​@@hasanraghibEven this guy is also lier

@tejasa8429

Ай бұрын

​@@piposcatEven this guy is lier.He is defending the historian who praised aurangazeb.

keerthi is playing with indian sentiments, regardless of the facts because that’s how you can get views

@tejasa8429

Ай бұрын

Well even this guy is doing the same thing in the name of fake atheism.

@niloytesla

Ай бұрын

@@tejasa8429 how?

@tejasa8429

Ай бұрын

@@niloytesla He is telling charvaka school of taught as not atheism. He is blindly defending this western historian who has glorified monster like aurangazeb.

@niloytesla

Ай бұрын

​@@tejasa8429 sorry, could you please clarify.

@tejasa8429

Ай бұрын

@@niloytesla Charvaka is school of taught in Hinduism which accepts atheism.This youtuber told lies that charvaka is not true atheism. The western historian whom this youtuber is defending has glorified aurangazeb. This guy in the name of fake atheism is targeting Hinduism only.

I blocked keerti history since she used to make her videos sitting diagonally to the camera.

@fazer79

Ай бұрын

Now that is not forgivable!

@affren3148

Ай бұрын

Yep the gravest of her crimes😂

@sainarockz

29 күн бұрын

Hahahahah

vimoh's video in short A controversy arose involving Keerthi History and Audrey Truschke, who wrote a book on South Asian history. Truschke, in a lecture, mentioned she doesn’t focus on dynasties like the Gupta or Chola because many other historians already do, preferring to explore what life was like for ordinary people. Keerthi History cut a clip from this lecture, presenting it out of context to suggest that Truschke dismissed the Gupta dynasty’s achievements entirely. Keerthi History then highlighted the Gupta period’s accomplishments, such as the invention of the decimal system, in an attempt to refute Truschke. Two main issues with Keerthi History’s video are: 1. Attributing achievements like the invention of the decimal system directly to the ruling dynasty is misleading, as these developments often reflect broader societal progress rather than just the rulers’ actions. 2. The video misrepresented Truschke’s lecture by taking her comments out of context, potentially driven by personal bias against her.

@adityabansal7809

Ай бұрын

Thanks, man.

Keerthy history's all claims for Gupta period is taking from a competitive book called "Lucent"😅😅

@kamleshnarayan3286

Ай бұрын

😂😂😂 100%

@sagarhp2350

Ай бұрын

Yess ., 😅😅 should check even if its in the same order

A group of people beating drums locked up inside an echo chamber and claiming that the only sound in the world is of beating drums.

People need to understand that gupta Empires (which were Buddhists) and todays Gupta people has no connection.. today's gupta people just stole their name for surname. In British Era ✅

@sanjay59741

Ай бұрын

There are some Gupta's who are claiming that they are descendants of the Gupta rulers? 🙄

@YuezhiTribe

Ай бұрын

Haina ! And we Budhhists too agree that they weren't all that important

@DisProfundis

Ай бұрын

Guptas were Buddhists? 😂Another product of failed education.

@DisProfundis

Ай бұрын

@@YuezhiTribe You're most probably psuedo-Buddhist Ambedkarite, who has nothing to do with Buddhism.

@rajashah1353

Ай бұрын

What the F Gupta consider they self Kshatriya 🤣

Keerti history is the worst history channel Edit : Keerti history is the worst channel in the history

@sandeepsuman6381

Ай бұрын

You consider her channel as a history channel

@montechristoJr

Ай бұрын

Its not history channel its a propaganda channel

@SugaNuna-pw7dv

Ай бұрын

​@@sandeepsuman6381 i think he wanted to say, "worst channel in the history", but typo got him😂

@Ram_Mohammad_Singh_Adam

Ай бұрын

Exactly, just a propaganda channel

@nohandler1493

Ай бұрын

​@@SugaNuna-pw7dv😂😂😂 thats a good one

And also in gupta period women condition not well and castism increases. Source - tamil nadu class 11 book

@gobimurugesan2411

Ай бұрын

Every historian knows this

@deepikasingh7634

Ай бұрын

@@ayushgupta4376 but why you didn't give any women scholar name and you didn't give any source of your argument. May be there was 1 or 2 scholar women . But as you know Exceptions are not rules. I think you only study history that's why you don't know the exceptions and the rules concept. Exceptions are everywhere but it can't become rule because of their quantity. Read science and other subjects as well.

@gobimurugesan2411

Ай бұрын

@@ayushgupta4376 Just because ur a Gupta ur defending here...lol

Guptas were as important to India's history as Tang or Han dynasty of Chinese history. Sanskrit changed from Vedic Sanskritam to Dhrupadi Sanskrit. Trade roots were expanded, agriculture flourished, decentralized civil administration came to existence, Nalanada Baudh Bihar strengthened study of Buddhist philosophy, Hindu philosophy and astronomy. Trigonometry with Bhaskara 2's sine approximations were derived. Courts were divides from district to province level. So yeah Guptas are important. As an indian atheist who loves his nation than any religion, I will say that Guptas have importance in indian history. Similarly we must keep in mind that Guptas enjoyed prosperity as the Muarians and Shungas strengthened agriculture and rule of law. But some evil practices like Varna discrimination, Sati came into existence in late Gupta period which was not cool at all.

@basantprasadsgarden8365

Ай бұрын

I think comparing Guptas to Hans will be an overstatement because Hans were remembered long after their decline in China and their Empirical and Ethnic legacy continued, while after the decline of Guptas, nobody remembered them up until their Signs were rediscovered by the British.

@combinatorics1224

Ай бұрын

@@basantprasadsgarden8365 In China, there were no large scale destruction of infrastructure or foreign attacks. After the Mongol attacks when the Mongol Yuan dynasty ruled China, they repaired and restored many buildings. Same is case for Japan. The Ashikaga Shogunate rebuilt structures of Kamakura Shogunate and Hojo Clan even after defeating and destroying their clans. Same was case for the Tokugawa... they didn't destroy all castles of their enemies... infact Tokugawa Hidetada rebuilt many of those broken castles. So the later kings didn't remember Guptas that much because their inscriptions, mansions everything were nearly destroyed by the late Pushyavuti and Maukhari dynasties.

@combinatorics1224

Ай бұрын

@@basantprasadsgarden8365 I am not comparing Hans with Guptas, sir. I am comparing their importance.

@basantprasadsgarden8365

Ай бұрын

@@combinatorics1224 even in that context, Guptas were just a major dynasty in the unstable landscape of the later ancient period. Their contributions are significant, though not that much as they are credited for.

@combinatorics1224

Ай бұрын

@@basantprasadsgarden8365 True 👍

She is an actual historian while keerti is simply a youtube historian .

@anonymous_4276

Ай бұрын

Yes for God's sake what gives these KZread historians the qualifications to challenge scholars without even properly looking into their works or using their words out of context. Truly shows how these jingoists are a bunch of ignorant morons.

@harshbharti-tp4yk

23 күн бұрын

She(Audrey) is very biased historian who tried to hide and defend the Aurangzeb's brutality and ruthlessness . So a historian who can show a demon as a neutral figure can't be trusted . It's the same as defending the criminal in modern time by saying that he got reasons.

Glad you are uploading back on this channel vimoh, do make Stream highlight's or the best moments from stream available here.

Exactly this video was needed .. Dynastic history is the whole history !.. No socio political history , socio- economic , administrative history , religious history etc there are so many aspect of a particular time period in history.. but we always go only for Dynastic history . The problem is we don't question " why , how and from where the person who is spitting something " ... If we do so every question can be answered.

she may be talking about subaltern part of history.

What is this obsession of historians to condense indian history in a single book ?

@supernovic99

Ай бұрын

They don't condense the entirety of indian history, only the basics or important periods of it. I mean to be fair, our history books do it worse in school

@adityabansal7809

Ай бұрын

Ummm, what is the problem?

109% sure Keerthi did not even see the original video. Because that would be history study.

She is a good business woman😂She has her product and she knows her buyers and how to advertise it. Even won awards because of her strategy

Hey uncle! She wasn't giving all credits to Guptas, she was stating that all that happened during the Gupta's 'period' (Period) (literatures, all the inventions, art & architecture), Travelogues of Hiuen Tsang(xuanzang) & Faxian are important to know the history of India, and it happened during Guptas 'period' , and even if you want to focus on 'ground level social changes' then Xuanzang & Faxian's travelogues are more important. She wasn't giving credits what I mentioned above to Guptas but stating that the 'period' was important.

Keerthi history girl looks so extremely insecure

@user-ke7iv3ff3l

Ай бұрын

@@annupriya7875 acharya prashant ko suna bhi karo

I'll take this video as book recommendations.

@HUMASAJIDALI

Ай бұрын

Did you understand which book has this lady written on which this whole debate started?

Okay. What was the context of Audrey calling Rama a misogynistic pig?

@fazer79

Ай бұрын

Offended? Great! Well, she said it because he denied to accept her as his wife after rescuing her! He compared her to the food touched by dog.

@HRC294

Ай бұрын

@@fazer79 Cool. Is Prophet Mohammed a pedophile?

@HRC294

Ай бұрын

@@36KACRE Hhmmm

@PropioniBacteriumShermanii

Ай бұрын

Give citations for your claim please ​@@fazer79

@jagatsimulation

Ай бұрын

​@@HRC294 just listen to her and read her books you will understand she is paid historian from global muslim powers. If these people use just 1% of their brain they will understand about her intentions

Average Sanghi - Let’s twist the history and take credit for things we have no idea about.

I'd recommend Jay Vardhan's youtube channel for those who want to know how & when the Empires grew & declined in Ancient India. He's pretty Honest to the analysis based on authentic evidence available till date. Plus I wanted to know that don't you think the ruling Empires of a significantly large region have an imapct on the social, economic & cultural life of the people within the region. Don't you think that the Success of the Nalanda University had anything to do with the then Ruling Empires who provided good enough atmosphere for it's growth. So how could she neglect a powerful ruling Dynasty covering almost entire northern India at it's peak by saying that it's not that important at all and that too when Science & Mathematics boomed in that time.

@utkarshsingh-rp2dq

28 күн бұрын

I think she said that her focus is different than other historians.

Guptas are Hindus??😂😂😂 That influencer is totaly insane

@rommelbengali

Ай бұрын

They weren't?

@y1.5

Ай бұрын

Gupta's were Buddhists

@y1.5

Ай бұрын

@@rommelbengali they were Buddhists

@TheOggy1988

Ай бұрын

@@rommelbengali they all are buddhists. Even the Chanakya was a imaginary character.

@rommelbengali

Ай бұрын

@@TheOggy1988Fr?

Very aptly explained and rebutted!

sir can you reccomend some good books on history in general, voh google pe toh sab baiased reccomendation hote hai i need some real to truth history books of world, spesificaaly on eurasian civilization

@montechristoJr

Ай бұрын

There is no 'true' history books its always a gray area. As far as I understood history varies depending on who is saying it so read more than one book on a subject. For example read more than one book on Eurasian civilization and come to an conclusion by yourself. I would like to recommend 'A Political History of the World' by Jonathan Holslag its a good start have been reading for the last 8 months its good one(Though American history is discussed very less). He has given some book recommendations also based on each chapter.

@jack76thegamer30

Ай бұрын

@@montechristoJr thanks

@montechristoJr

Ай бұрын

@@jack76thegamer30 👍

@gamesong6600

Ай бұрын

Yes no true history books. Just ask for concrete evidence, else accept it as one plausible explanation and stay open.

@sauravsuresh6388

Ай бұрын

Doesn't matter if they're biased. Just be aware of your own biases, so that you can evaluate those texts critically and analytically.

I stopped watching her when she literally denied the existence of castiesm from Indian history n said Britishers n Mughals started casteism 🥴

@RAMTA_SLAYER

Ай бұрын

😂😂😂that’s Ramta cooked up history

Whatever the name of this lady (foreigner) Once i saw a video where she was poking her nose in Indian history and blaming Indian to be the most cruel in past that somewhere true also but she was exaggerating and a man stood up and show her true position😂😂

@kartik6023

21 күн бұрын

He didn't respond to any argument and started some rant on native Americans which has nothing to do with the topic

A GOOD VIDEO THANKS FOR CREATING A GOOD KNOWLEDGABLE VIDEO THAN OTHERS

Enlightenment is when you understand "There was no such Hinduism thing before 8th century".🙏

@Samresponds

Ай бұрын

Yes I agree because islamic emperors gave them penal court and personal court to solve their issues, so that pandits made their own religion for ruling .

@anasqureshi644

Ай бұрын

a guy science journey also claim that but i think we still more and more evidence to reach to this conclusion because this statement is very bold and pathbreaking in itself even our ncert is teaching us about rigveda yajurveda etc

@AmarjitSingh-dhani

Ай бұрын

Hinduism as religion has came into existence during british period. Otherwise word Hindu used to mean person living east of river Sindhu or broadly between Himalaya and Hind mahasagar. Brahamavad developed after 8th century as a religion and replaced Budhism and Jainism due to royal patronage maybe.

@ipranayy

Ай бұрын

Yes it was sanatan dharma

@JivanKumar007

Ай бұрын

@@ipranayy "एस धम्मो सनातनो" ये पंक्ती बुद्ध की हैं. इससे पहले कोई सनातन वणातन नही था गुरु. हिंदू को सनातन बोलने की प्रथा पिछले 150 सालों की हैं.

That American Historian is the same Historian who said Aurangzeb was not cruel or he was Good king or something .

@RAMTA_SLAYER

Ай бұрын

Upper castes enjoyed luxurious life under Mughals from being their commanders to advisors. So yes,he was not cruel against them but upper castes were cruel against their own fellow lower castes. Upper castes cruelty >>>>aurangzeb.

@anaesthete5592

Ай бұрын

​@@RAMTA_SLAYER still can't blame Mughals? Lol only upper castes were the bad guys

@PropioniBacteriumShermanii

Ай бұрын

It's funny how you're ready to defend a tyrant our of hate for people of your own nation, sure do that you'll still be considered a kafir. ​@@RAMTA_SLAYER

@PropioniBacteriumShermanii

Ай бұрын

​@@RAMTA_SLAYERDefending a tyrant out of hate for people of your own nation? So cool.

@RAMTA_SLAYER

Ай бұрын

@@PropioniBacteriumShermanii go and ask the low castes why they are availing reservations and you will get your answer. Now,you wanna defend those oppressors just to make someone villain? So cool.

You are doing a great job Vimoh sir, you are showing the blind followers the path of truth. I am also an atheist like you, please keep making videos about the reality of religion, whether anyone supports or not, I will support.

Keerti is so insecure.

But that doesnt discount her statement about her saying they werent important in terms of changing the course of history. That is where the disagreement is being shown. u missed that part

Everything is OK but if you're defending so called "historian" like Audrey, then you're literally cooked🕊

@NeKo19113

Ай бұрын

As someone who doesn't know who this white lady is... After watching the cut out vimoh's clip ... what's your take for defending keerthi here ??😅

@rare_red

Ай бұрын

Have you read her books fully? Or it's just that you're defending your favorite youtuber?

@mithilbhoras5951

Ай бұрын

He is only defending one point Audrey made in that clip. That doesn't mean defending Audrey's entire work. You are mixing two different things here.

@suryamkishore4797

Ай бұрын

What else did you think the short was about? U really thought it had anything to do with Keerthi History? 😂 My brother doesn't know how manipulation and propaganda works.. ❤

@katagiri_yuuichi_69

Ай бұрын

chup singhi ​@@suryamkishore4797

Vimoh sir plzz wrote a book on Atheism ❤️⚛️.

"Rocky ne rock pe rocket rakha" bolo 💀🤌

Vimoh sir I will be happy if I would ever get a session or a normal discussion in case if you come live on any application and on you tube. However it will be a good and beneficial for all of us to have exhcange of ideas and concepts through friendly and fruitful discussion from different views culture religion theism science and history from a academic perspective.

@vimoh History of the people vs History of the rulers. How much will it(dichotomy)be relevant during british rule or mughal rule in india? Need to resolve that first and then we can go back thousands of years.

Why is this important to us???

@adityabansal7809

Ай бұрын

Wdym? Why history is important?

@manujohn99

Ай бұрын

@@adityabansal7809 where is history????

@rare_red

Ай бұрын

"Misinformation is killing india"

@jagatsimulation

Ай бұрын

​@@manujohn99 indian history wrote by white dudes

@adityabansal7809

Ай бұрын

@@manujohn99 If you mean where to study "true" history from, I believe the best way to study history is to read the books of multiple authors, identify their(and possibly your) biases, and choose the lesser of the two evils, ig.

Hello bhai. Can you please make a video on Beerbicep bringing archeologists like Nilesh Oak with some proofs ? I am even not sure he is archelogist as per his linkedin account.

Hi Vimoh, what is your view on Nihilism? Is an agnostic atheist a nihilist?

Sushruta lived during Gupta's period?? He lived in 7th century BC

First basic fact is that you know the most recent history best and it declines as you go farther past

If I would have to learn or hear about ancient history I would prefer to hear it from the Jay Vardhan Singh. His videos sound professional and he also quotes the Sources , both primary and secondary in his videos regarding the subject. Unlike Kriti History who only knows to create Strawman and Manipulated arguments.

This Keerthi history girl is basically a professional victim

both her and Ranveer use the same formula. roll out content that gets views. no matter how non credible it is

I commented on that post, too, and all the facts she was stating, are so vague, and most of them not even have any relation with gupta empire, he banged my head against the wall, when I saw the video, litrely she made video, where she stated everything wrong. How clueless a person can be, I can't understand.

Vimoh what do you think about the allegorical view of religion some theists present for example in abrahamic faiths the Adam and eve part is not True in the literal sense but is allegorical like eve forming out of Adams ribcage signifying that a male and a female are dependant on one and another. Same could be said of the Mahabharata like everything written there is one big allegory or moral dilemma. But still they claim through this allegory the divinity had tried to guide mankind to a stable and ordered society. There are also those who argue that religion doesn't create morality but rather it enforces morality to all because a common folk is not literate enough to contemplate the moral dilemma and thought.Thus they claim religion is completely different from science as it is a tool to express philosophy, simple moral guidance to dilemma and general way of living life and establishing stability and social relations in the society. I know this is very rare inainstream religion but I still see it happening. A hindu once said to me that he takes mahabharata and ramayana as philosophy and not literal history or literal truth. I would like to hear your thoughts on this matter.

Hey Vimoh I just wanna tell u that u should invite christian debater Dr. John Lennox,(he's a professor of Oxford University) Kent Hovind and Dr.william Lane Craig . please invite them to discuss about Christianity and its belief

Tum karo to leela ! Dusre kare to chedkhani ?

Hi bro, Can you please make a video mythology of Indo-European languages family? For example scholars say Indra, Dyaus pitr, Surya, Agni, ashwin are all common in Indo-European language speakers.

Keerthi was right. Seems uncle wanna get some limelight thats why opposing it. Watched both video. Keethi is right. And rhe logic she gives. There is alreadty lot of books on indian kings like gupta so yhats why she focus on focus. Lol. In parallel universe aunty. Seems uncle wanted pink so trying to defend her. Nahi degi uncle.

🙏Please make a video on why there is a shiv natraja statue at cern lab

I agree with ur view on most part except considering Truschke and Thapar as a reliable sources of information. They writes biased version of past and hence is unreliable. Read books by scholars who do not mix their politics in their works.

There are different ways to approach history, but i dont agree woth the view that history is solely about the natives. Afterall, you won't find the history of red Indians in American history, or say, the Australian aborigines or New Zealander Maoris, would you ? It's equally important to study who ruled the country. There are two ways a society changes: one way is bottom up where change starts from the ground root upwards, for example the spread of Buddhism or for that matter, any religion. Then there's another change that is imposed from top down. Like institutionalising the caste system within state by the 1871 census and state employment policies of British, or the Mansabdari and Zamindari system of Mughals. Without understanding the background and influences of the rulers, you won't be able to understand what actually caused a top-down change in society. Now whether Guptas were great or not, i leave it to the individuals to decide. But as far as cultural renaissance and achievements are concerned, Guptas have contributed much more to our tangible anient heritage than any other ruling class. The reason why everyone knows the name of Kalidas or the existing ancient ayurvedic texts, it's because of the Gupta's patronage. They may not be the sole contributors to Indian heritage, but let's not belittle them by discrediting their achievements.

If Keerthi thinks history should only be told from the native's point of view (which is not really a bad thing), then we'll have to take the Itihaas and Puranas literally. You know... the books that talk about Samudramanthan or a large scale war between Devas and Asuras or an army of humanoid monkeys or any other such mythological stuff. And the fact that she doesn't even considered historians like Thapar or Habib as "natives" is kinda hypocritical.

Oh. And one more point. Romila Thapar is a "native".

Hey vimoh so as we debate, we respect other's opinions and don't force them to believe us, right? So in our (atheist's) imaginary ideal world, where everyone will be happy and in good position, will religious opinions exist?

It's irony that she has history in the name of her channel

Keerthi's mother tongue is not tamil although she was raised in Tamilnadu. But she fakes and creates an illusion like she is a Tamil in her interviews. If you are a marati, and if you are born in a punjab , that doesn't make you a punjab. She camouflages herself as a Tamilian.

Keep it up 🙏

Mauryans literally 1. Defeated Alexander's army (headed by Selucus Nikator) 2. Made Akhand Bharat (largest Indian Empire) 3. Largest GDP contribution Indian subcontinent ever gave 4. Highest Indian global influence (spread of Buddhism from Afghanistan to Thailand)

@zakialmahin7278

Ай бұрын

Their narrowminded approach to history wouldn't comprehend that

@napoleonrabbit

Ай бұрын

The Hunas caused their destruction. Yet you blame the Muslims.

@FineWine-v4.0

Ай бұрын

Waha GDP kyu apply kar rahe ho bhai ?

@KINGSTUNAX

Ай бұрын

😂 India is the most invaded land on the planet earth

@KINGSTUNAX

Ай бұрын

There is no largest Empire that India content

Vimoh you should read books by dr mubarak ali on history

this american historian follows 'hit and run' strategy

O:24 is that a mad women Northeast was never part of any Indian kingdom their natives rulers were there😂😂😂

Abki yoga controversy pe aap kya kehna chahenge aur iske liye samaj ko kaise sudhara ja sakta hai aap ka kya ray hai pls ispe video banaiye

Keerthika Govindhasamy ( content maker of keerthi history) is a good person overall...but the problem is she seems to be a paid RW activist like many or an active member of BJP IT cell... With the mission of propagating RW propaganda...

Even if we don't want to do go through dynasties, even then gupta period is worth more than 2 Paras for the sheer cultural legacy it left.

Thank you so much for addressing. Keerthi history tends to time and again lose context and nuance. I frankly do want to believe what she says for pride and ego sake " we are so great" trope. But then unfortunately we also have a logical mind.

okay so what is the point of this video?

@rommelbengali

Ай бұрын

That Keerti is a lier.

@ChrisSamuel1729

Ай бұрын

If you don’t think this video has as fine a point, do watch other videos on the topic of the propagandizing of history and caricaturing of historians by South Asian right wing KZreadrs. This video was not meant to be the first or last word on this topic. Please watch other, perhaps more substantial videos by Vimoh or even other even-keeled commentators on this topic (Science is Dope, perhaps). Or, even better, go read Romila Thapar’s book.

@MischiefL0ki

Ай бұрын

that Keerti has played the game of victimhood once again

@fushhiii

Ай бұрын

​@@MischiefL0ki isn't that what vimoh did right here?

@adityabansal7809

Ай бұрын

@@fushhiii Ummmm, when did Vimoh pretend to be a victim?

Just read your University Undergraduate History course if anyone is fascinated with history and you will be covered Social Political Economic Monarchic scientific literature Art and Architectural form of History Regarding Nanda's Maurya's Gupta's Chola's Pallava's Vatakata's Tripartite Struggle Rajput Dynasties Delhi Sultanate Mughal Empire and British India Post world war - 2 Nationalistic movements and Independence post Independence all in One Go You can just download resources from DU websites of all semesters 1-6 of History and there you Go and then Read all the Authors and their Views if you think that our Curriculum is influenced by Marxism or left ideology read them thorolgy by buying there books or from kuku FM audio version and then if you want to read Right leaning then that also after consiming so much time you will finally have a mixed take regarding History at some places Right leaning people are correct and at some places left ideolgy is better to approach the history so that you can clearly see through all the biases that's the best way you can go up with.

I said to my grandmother that god doesn't exist. She said that"abhi tak aisi ko machine bani hai kya jisme ek seed dalo to bohot sare seeds aur crops bahar ate hai" 😅.

The person who didn't study say Physics after 10th grade, usually doesn't pretend to be a Physicist publicly. But the problem with History is even an engineer by training can publicly pretend to be a Historian! History is a serious subject and it has its own methods of study. Any person who is interested in History should first study Historiography. Otherwise they will be confused between Literature and History. History tries to model the past of human civilization as Economics tries to model the present. As Economics does not always have to be normative, History also has no obligation to be inspiring. But contemporary politics always tries to mend the native history in a way that suits their purpose. This is a trap. We need to free the study of native History from politically motivated ambitions of its natives. It is true for every society, not only for India.

For anyone wondering y conservatives always likes Gupta empire. During the Gupta Empire caste system become official. Officially mixing caste become sin. Manu smriti like casteist rules become part of government laws.

Humaare desh ko sabse bada khatra pseudo science waalo aur padhe likhe wo log jo jaan boojh k fake things failaate hai unse hai.

Can we be just Indians, not guptas choudharys khans chakrabortys jaats singhs etc etc

Bhaiya ap kuch sirf hindu supporter ko terget kar video banate ho lekin ap dusre religion wale pe video kyun nehi banate ho😅😊

@vimoh

Ай бұрын

Banata hoon. Channel dekho bhai

Keethi History Is A Self-Claimed Historian 😂

Please speak hindi please tbi to ham sb ko samajhane me asani hogi

@rommelbengali

Ай бұрын

Bhai English itni bhi kathin bhasha nahi hai.

@supernovic99

Ай бұрын

Hindi's isn't india's national language. There are many indians like me who are interested in his videos but don't know hindi. It is better for him to make videos in english

U call yourself atheist but most of it videos on Hinduism why not Islam n Christianity. I agree every religion has drawbacks but make videos on Islam n Christianity. Let's see your courage😅

@vimoh

Ай бұрын

Already have

@日本語大好き

Ай бұрын

Where is the video about hinduism? Aren't we debunking misinformation peddler people?

@Sagar-vw9ud

Ай бұрын

@@vimoh but not the way u do about Hinduism deep digging n scrutinizing about each in every minute things of Hinduism. Because even u know that u may get death threat when u criticise Islam deeper. U criticise Islam in the shadow of Hinduism saying that it's applies to Islam also. U r pseudo atheist just here to criticise Hinduism. I welcome if u criticise n scrutiny also religion according to their religious text. Hope u do it. Have some courage.

@jagatsimulation

Ай бұрын

Indian atheism and liberalism means shittin on hinduism for no reason and loving radical Abrahamic religions

Science journey channel pe india ki history hai real

Keerti history is basically a KZread version of WhatsApp University History.

She's a Tamil RSS face

Rathert then taegeting keerthy for views can you target ncert fragmented history 🙂

@suryamkishore4797

Ай бұрын

No IT cell would pay for that. He has to take care of his income! 🤡

Keerthi History ❌ Keerthi's History ✅🤡

Playing with people too much. Why is she telling people to care about empires while living in an independent country

❤❤❤❤❤❤

Whenever I see Keerthi, I just exit youtube.

Godi media 😅

Gupta 's were Vishnu bhakts

KEERTI is the Voice of Sanghis

decided not to get married is already a first sign of Intelligence and high IQ.

@ridhamatri9447

Ай бұрын

Thanks 😁

Guptas period is ofcourse the golden age for the Manuvadis.

Vimoh ji aapki mrityu ke baad aapke shareer ka kya kiya jaayega?

Keerthi is the ged version of Audrey both are worst

Sir 1 long vedio on J Sai Deepak hindutva activist

hindi