*What year do you think humans will go to Mars for the first time?*

@official_skirt6440

Жыл бұрын

2040

@reBlink

Жыл бұрын

2060

@buntyhalder8136

Жыл бұрын

2026

@Erick-ev5zt

Жыл бұрын

2025

@soratenshi2847

Жыл бұрын

2370

"Locally produced methane" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there

@BerserkBrownie

4 ай бұрын

Also thats gone. Forever in vacuum of space. Its gonna run out.. eventually

@Admiralty86

4 ай бұрын

Are they confident they can liberate the methane from wherever it is?

@subwarpspeed

4 ай бұрын

​@@Admiralty86made from the atmosphere, using the sabatier process. It will just sit there and create the fuel out of thin air (literally 😂) over a long time.

@utku486

4 ай бұрын

@@subwarpspeed where are they getting the hydrogen from? Non tested water reserves on mars?

@Alonnaemeka

4 ай бұрын

So they going over there and start mining, what if the mining equipment becomes faulty, or the elements and compounds calculated to be present where erroneous, they would just get stuck in mars

"Locally produced methane" Houston, we're down to our last fart to get us home. Wish us luck.

@skillsnwokoloanthony7557

4 ай бұрын

Not exactly what they mean Mars atmosphere is filled with methane 🐥

@keithpryor411

4 ай бұрын

@@skillsnwokoloanthony7557 I am aware that they are likely referring to methane produce during the breakdown of organic matter.

@dcmbrown

4 ай бұрын

I came here to make a very similar joke.

@DieselRamcharger

4 ай бұрын

@@keithpryor411 WHAT ORGANIC MATTER? there is no life on mars. Yet you dont realize youve been lied to your entire life.

@LegaliseIntellect

4 ай бұрын

Mars is red

I don't understand, it worked perfectly in the cartoon.

@jesus4400

2 ай бұрын

Space is FAKE and CGI.

@evolicious

2 ай бұрын

Elon brain runs on farts (methane)

@My_Videos_Your_Serenity

2 ай бұрын

she/he made effort to explain the process in layman's terms and your response is to mock them ?!

@xchangeparticle8405

2 ай бұрын

Those research Films not cartoons - Great Dictator of Wadiya Allauddin

@onradioactivewaves

Ай бұрын

"It's not CGI! Can you believe it!!!?"

I think realistically the best option would be to take off from a moon base so you could build a much bigger ship

@user-qz3ol1fi2g

Күн бұрын

Логично🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

@joeybox0rox649

8 сағат бұрын

Mars is a fools errand.

I never knew Mars was so close to earth

@alfonsomarrero9742

Жыл бұрын

I never knew that starship was so big

@avtoorX

Жыл бұрын

no

@anerfilms292

Жыл бұрын

I never knew there were massive platforms orbiting the earth

@redbitch3362

Жыл бұрын

dad's joke?

@Maxzes_

Жыл бұрын

@@redbitch3362 Nah, r/shittyaskscience type of joke

This is the most overly simplified description of space travel ever

@Lerppunen

5 ай бұрын

Except it’s not overly simplified. It fits its purpose.

@davidelliott5843

5 ай бұрын

This is how the early flights will go. In the long run sun orbiting space stations will be used. These will be timed to connect Earth to Mars and Mars to Earth. Ships will dock passengers and payloads to an outgoing station. Ship will undock near Mars. Return flights will do the same probably using ships on a different orbit to avoid a very long return journey.

@melisaross2468

5 ай бұрын

Totally agree hell everybody should know that the governments have done engineered the spaceships they have confiscated over the years they have technology that we can’t even comprehend but they going to keep it to thereselves for another 100 years SMDH

@vladmitrache6373

4 ай бұрын

​@davidelliott5843 I mean, only if Musk doesn't single-handedly come up with teleportationt by then.

@carlpanzram7081

4 ай бұрын

Yeah hey, let's just "fly over there" 😂

This must be a solid plan and totally legit - just look, they got an ANIMATION!

@dinamiteurdinamiteur2324

2 ай бұрын

They obviously can work what's the problem

@s.o.4339

2 ай бұрын

@@dinamiteurdinamiteur2324 Yeah, great argumentation, they "can work". Just like the hyperloop theoretically "could work" but doesn't even after years and years. It is the usual money laundering from the worlds #1 con artist.

@PWATR

2 ай бұрын

​@@dinamiteurdinamiteur2324 bruh. Starship is a joke

@dinamiteurdinamiteur2324

2 ай бұрын

@@PWATR you are a joke, and as smart as a dead seagul. Keep it quiet

@PokrPro21

2 ай бұрын

NASA only ever has animations and artist renderings. NASA is BS.

It’s such an awesome thing to think about and I believe we can and will put American boots on Mars soon. To see pictures and videos in 4K of people walking on Mars is incredible to think about.

@SuperUAP

2 ай бұрын

Such a waste of resources and time. I sure wouldn't want to be the first one 😂

@TheRealHaloLover

2 ай бұрын

"Soon" 😂 bro we're at least 20 years out and those people we send will die.

@mjp152

20 күн бұрын

Dont hold your breath. This is orders of magnitude more complicated than it should be.

@karolis5376

8 күн бұрын

@@SuperUAPwhen ww3 happens I bet you’ll take this comment back 😂

@lukepurse9042

7 күн бұрын

​@karolis5376 what future do you think is on Mars?

I never knew there was already a star ship on mars waiting for other star ships from earth

@J040PL7

Жыл бұрын

We'll invent teleportation by then 🤣

@J040PL7

Жыл бұрын

@Freedom Family you're never too late when you can teleport 😅

@J040PL7

Жыл бұрын

@Freedom Family even jupiter? You know that planet has no surface and the pressure would kill you before you're crushed by its core right? 🤣 I wouldn't teleport into that.

@J040PL7

Жыл бұрын

@Freedom Family damn, they're too good.

@spacewalker7520

Жыл бұрын

​@@J040PL7You do realise that teleportation is copying and deleting the person then printing a copy of him with his memories at a different location? Your clone who will be living your life not you. It's nothing like in movies, reality is often dissapointing. I don't think anyone would like teleportation if they knew how it works. 😂

If there is ANYTHING I have learned from watching science content on KZread over the years, it's that you never EVER trust a CGI presentation.

@derlowenkonig7971

4 ай бұрын

It's amazing how they will just repeat anything some techno-entrepreneur will say without the tiniest bit if critical thinking...😢

@masonhidari

4 ай бұрын

The NPC programming demands that you believe elon is a bad person. And true to programming you are hating the man that is pushing world's space expiration to become viable

@Mustang_G

4 ай бұрын

Don't know if Powerpoint counts as CGI

@AdrieKooijman

4 ай бұрын

The magic is in the missing numbers. Without any form of support (by numbers for example) CGI is just fantasy. Basically those CGI fantasies are a form of gish gallop - put in a lot of reasonable looking technology (that does not exist in the displayed form) and overwhelm the viewer with 'it's easy, we only need (lots of) money to further develop existing knowledge'. It takes ages to debunk the rubbish and it is easy to blow any critique away with 'the wright brothers' and similar examples from the past. "I can jump over one meter, there's no technical reason why I couldn't jump over six meter..."

@Businessonly752

4 ай бұрын

This is a PowerPoint

So, for one unit of rocket on Mars you need 4 units of rockets on Earth 🧐

@reiniermoreno1653

2 ай бұрын

That's how gravity works

@swp

2 ай бұрын

@@reiniermoreno1653dude put in a thinking emoji as if he just “unearthed” something… 😂

@jacobkleinsasser5658

2 ай бұрын

What if we managed to get a settlement on the moon? If we did that we could launch the mission to Mars from the moon which would require FAR less fuel. ​@@reiniermoreno1653

@rodschmidt8952

2 ай бұрын

See also: rocket equation (you need fuel to lift the fuel)

Refueling in space looks like a big deal. “Is it in?” “Nah push more” “Is it in now?” “U got the right hole”

@stevenswapp4768

2 ай бұрын

Huston, we have a pregnancy

Minor thing: The tanking/refueling happens in orbit of earth. The animation makes it seem like this happens in transition to Mars.

@crackshotyt9962

Жыл бұрын

It's still pretty obvious that's not the case if you listen to the man talking

@ummerfarooq5383

Жыл бұрын

If it could happen in transits to mars, the refueling tanks already waiting in specific orbital path points, wouldn't that reduce time to get to mars?

@mdcclxxviepluribusunum1066

Жыл бұрын

The animation isn’t accurate. Oh no

@subwarpspeed

Жыл бұрын

​@@ummerfarooq5383 no. They would have to match speed and trajectory. And there aren't any helping it back either from Mars to Earth. The ship will have enough propellant to accelerate and then use Mars atmosphere to slow down.

@Michaelobama184

Жыл бұрын

​@@subwarpspeed it's all Fake. We live under a Firmament that is impossible to pass through it

Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. - Mike Tyson -

@omarbarrios3420

Жыл бұрын

We're you on the wrong short?

@corbynite2004

Жыл бұрын

@@omarbarrios3420 no, he is on point, the amount of planning that actually needs to be done for a successful Mars mission and the amount of planning that Musk has done are not even in the same ballpark. The video makes it seem so simple, but it is not, hence the very appropriate Mike Tyson quote

@vanbogan3712

Жыл бұрын

​@corbynite2004 I don't think you can comment on how much planning has been done unless you work at Spacex lol.

@corbynite2004

Жыл бұрын

@@vanbogan3712 SpaceX is a private profit-seeking company, not a government agency - they simply don't have the capacity to do anything on that scale, nor will they until taxpayer dollars have paid for all the hard lessons and paved the way to profitability. You can send a bunch of NASA engineers over to the private (profiteering) sector, but that does not put SpaceX on the same level as NASA, and it certainly doesn't make the daydreams of a demented billionaire into a sturdy foundation for the next generation of space programs. If the West wants to pretend that private companies can drive space exploration then they will only succeed at throwing money into the black hole of billionaires' pockets while BRICS+ countries win the actual space race.

@vanbogan3712

Жыл бұрын

@corbynite2004 @corbynite2004 I really can't take anything you say seriously sorry when you lay your biases out so clearly. I'm more inclined to trust the company that has been wildy successful since it's inception (yes even more so then NASA. There is a reason they pumped so much money into spacex) then some random internet person who's main problem clearly lies with a certain someone with lots of money. Privatisation of space has clearly worked really well and if you can't see that writing on the wall then that's a you problem bud.

"How Starship will get us to Mars." Step 1: don't explode.

LOL 😂, the launch from the flat line is hilarious.....

“Fueled by locally produced methane” Like there will be a service station when they get there

@timminh468

4 ай бұрын

They’ll have everything setup now don’t worry sit down and be quiet and learn

@yohiyoyo1

3 ай бұрын

The ship will collect methane from the atmosphere

@universeslap

3 ай бұрын

Awesome plan! So few things could go wrong🥳

@ilikeanimals5015

3 ай бұрын

​@@universeslap that's how you improve bud, now keep sitting there working the same job till you retire

@universeslap

3 ай бұрын

@@ilikeanimals5015 I would rather Improve Earth's ecosystem, than fuel some billionaire's wet dream.

Everything is possible when u know how to maneuver the mouse 😂😂

@lubomirkubasdQw4w9WgXcQ

Жыл бұрын

*_?!_*

@Kube_Dog

3 ай бұрын

@@lubomirkubasdQw4w9WgXcQ keep up

@lemarz8006

Ай бұрын

What does this even mean. Please your phone and your remaining brain cells to search on this same platform “SpaceX launch” and you will see they’ve done 100’s maybe 1000’s of earth orbiting payload launches

So for this to work, you have to build a methane fuel factory and refuling facility on Mars. Does SpaceX have a plan for that yet?

@Vatsyayana87

3 ай бұрын

Yes they do. Its two different processes (The Sabatier and Reverse something i cant recall off the top of my head) with a few steps each that converts CO2, H2O, a little extra H2 and a lot of energy into pure CH4 and O2. Its not too complicated and mostly just uses different heating techniques to both break down the said starting molecules and recombine them into the desired ones.

@98frenchfry

2 ай бұрын

They never made a single roadster doubt they can pull off a facility on another planet

@m2c_f87_

2 ай бұрын

@@98frenchfryyou know that space x doenst produce cars right? And tesla doesnt fly to mars.

@spuriouseffect

2 ай бұрын

@@m2c_f87_ Neither does SpaceX. There are so many problems to work out that we'll be lucky to see a base on the Moon in our lifetimes, let alone Mars.

@Vatsyayana87

Ай бұрын

@@spuriouseffect To combat both the nay says here, They sent a roadster (built by Elons other main company), to Mars' orbital plane on their first attempt during a test flight... Anyone who nays these guys are simpletons.

You left out the 8 - 10 refueling trips before leaving Earth's orbit.

Yeah, just like hyperloop, this will also revolutionize conartistry.

@zunden2

Жыл бұрын

they already changed the name to Hypersleep.

@zod8015

Жыл бұрын

He conceptualised the hyperloop idea and then put out a white paper for other entrepreneurs and businesses to develop it. That's why Virgin is working on hyperloop you clowns spam anything without any research

@santoshsharmaadhikari3623

Жыл бұрын

One thing is certain, sooner or later its gonna happen still people like you will exist who postponed their next target lol and still lost... Ignorance is bliss

@airstrike9002

7 ай бұрын

@@zod8015 He didn't conceptualize it, the idea has already existed for over 100 years but people decided to throw it away because it was such a dumb idea. Elon just made someone draw it again in CGI, went on interviews to promote it. And now somehow people are actually stupid enough to believe this concept works without a good working model even having been made in all those years. It's already been shown that Elon has tried to promote stupid sci-fi concepts in order to take away funding for other modes of transport and redirect them towards him like he did in Vegas. This is just another one of those.

@TheAmericanCatholic

7 ай бұрын

@@airstrike9002yes I understand Adam something fans that Elon musks public transportation ideas are usually bad but when it comes to space travel he does know what he is talking about. Look at the falcon 9 for example it has already transformed the aerospace industry by lowers launch costs far lower than the expendable rockets that we have today and now many aerospace companies are now focusing on reusability to catch up. The spacex starship is climbing out of the development phrase further every launch and when it can reliably get to orbit then everything ramps up and elon can send his starlink in mass,send Artemis to the moon and go to mars while commercial companies see the reliability and low cost so those companies attempt space ventures that were previously hindered by cost and vehicle launch size. Edit it doesn’t matter if you got these talking points from Adam something ,common sense skeptic or whoever else my point stands and btw it’s usually Adam something fans that repeat this.

if you miss your flight, you gonna have to wait for the next one,about 15 years

@alemnunez

6 ай бұрын

There is a transfer window every two years. If at some point they include nuclear/ion propulsion on board it would allow other/longer launch windows too.

@blanco7726

4 ай бұрын

Mars orbit is longer and slower, we catch up to Mars every 2 years roughly. However looking at the simulations, I wonder if there is a nice window to travel back. Because Mars' orbit is farther from ours on one side of the sun and Earth seems to catch up to Mars on that side every time, this means that as Mars approaches the closer side of its orbit, Earth is already wizzing by. Making it easy to just drop off our orbit and be caught up my Mars, but not the other way round really. Except possibly during a 3-5 month window just before Earth catches up ,which I dont think is sufficient for the 7 month ride. Could be they will have to take some insane trajectory

@blanco7726

4 ай бұрын

Also Mars is 20 000 kmh slower than Earth so you have less speed relative to both orbits.

@carpnentersxnine5onex408

4 ай бұрын

​

@clementpeloquin1131

4 ай бұрын

@@blanco7726there is a window. I think it’s every 2.5 years on mars (if a year is a full rotation of the sun)

Assemble, Helldivers 😂

" Get your ass to Mahz ." - Quaid

@ILLYRIANW0LF

4 ай бұрын

😂

@matteodotdpsatgmaildotcom2451

4 ай бұрын

- You are not you: you're me. - No shit...

@PatientPerspective

4 ай бұрын

😂

It takes A LOT of tankers to refuel the Starship in orbit.

@Michaelobama184

Жыл бұрын

It's a Lie

@ianvanessen2166

Жыл бұрын

Why? According to the diagram the starship in orbit hasn’t used any of its fuel. It should be at capacity

@disgruntledwookie369

Жыл бұрын

Current estimate says 5. Definitely more than 1 but not quite enough to justify the caps....

@disgruntledwookie369

Жыл бұрын

@@ianvanessen2166 I *think* you're being sarcastic but just in case, the starship has to use most of its own fuel in order to reach orbit. The booster only gets it started but the ship provides most of the delta V. By the time is reaches orbit it will only have maybe 1/5th of its propellant left in the tanks, some of which is needed for re-entry and landing. If they manage to get it down to 5 refilling trips that would be impressive. More likely it will be even more than that.

@ianvanessen2166

Жыл бұрын

@@disgruntledwookie369 yes I was more so just mocking the animation. Still, I know little about rockets and found your reply informative.

I'm fine with this Mars plan, we should always push forward.

@spuriouseffect

2 ай бұрын

It's a waste of time. The moon is a far better choice for a base. The gravity of mars is only 38 percent of earth, it doesn't have a magnetosphere, and a round trip takes at least 21 months, whereas a round trip to the moon takes about 6 to 8 days. The effects of low gravity make it impossible for long term stays on both the Moon and Mars. And besides, we haven't even figured out how to get a biosphere to work here on earth yet. We'll be lucky to see a base anywhere in our lifetimes.

"Get your ass to mars!" ~Douglas Quaid

This is like that rowboat problem where you can't put the dog and sheep on the same boat

@Heligoland360

4 ай бұрын

No it isn't. There doesn't need to be a second starship already on Mars, they just did it for illustrative purposes.

@jondonnelly4831

4 ай бұрын

Use a sheepdog

@tylerbehrends3304

3 ай бұрын

This made me laugh way more than it should’ve

@HappyCabezonFish-vk2hd

3 ай бұрын

Except not at all

@tylerbehrends3304

3 ай бұрын

@@HappyCabezonFish-vk2hd shhhhh

I'll just pay the Guild of Navigators to fold space and time.

@TucsonDude

4 ай бұрын

Out of spice.

@GoldAxoMC

4 ай бұрын

@@TucsonDude nahhh out of spice is crazy, get those desert mines going

Imagine we spent even half the resources and effort in fixing Earth's problems.

3-21-2024 good idea that will work. It's like going to Mars on a full tank .

WARNING: SCIENCE FICTION 🚨

@ABW777

Жыл бұрын

So is religion

@chrismarple

Жыл бұрын

@@ABW777 God is very real

@Kelontro117

Жыл бұрын

Warning: this user is oblivious of how much spacex is ahead nasa and has proven nasa wrong on so many levels

@richardrodriguez6689

Жыл бұрын

@@chrismarple no god was made up to scam and control uneducated people.

@chrismarple

Жыл бұрын

@@richardrodriguez6689 God has been here long long before any of us and will always be. Their is a reason humans are drawn to a higher power. God has put eternity into our hearts.

This reminds me. Many years ago .. "I lost my heart to a Starship Trooper"

@SD-tl7xw

4 ай бұрын

Me too. Man, she is gorgeous 😍

All in theory right now until it actually happens.

@potato147

2 ай бұрын

Yes and i hope to se it for real

Yes, guys, only in cartoons . They will never ever leave earth. In no 1000.000.000 years. 😂😂😂

If memory serves me correctly, SpaceX estimates up to 14 launches required to fuel up for the Earth to Mars leg.

@albertofoti4152

4 ай бұрын

that's for the moon. For Mars you just can't, you need propellant production there, otherwise you're screwed

@TheDwightMamba

4 ай бұрын

@@albertofoti4152 , no... that is to fuel up to go to Mars, like I said. It will need fuel launches for our moon as well. Apollo missions put less than 5% of its mass on our moon. Starship is so much heavier. SpaceX essentially has to launch the craft empty. A lot of loaded fighter jets have to take off and immediately refuel air-to-air, because they wouldn't get off the ground with ordinance and a full tank. I hope this was helpful.

@baekkistyle

4 ай бұрын

NASA estimates at least 15 starships to go to the moon and you think 14 will get it to Mars?😂

@TheDwightMamba

4 ай бұрын

@@baekkistyle SpaceX said 14. What is the difference between Mars and our moon in regards to Starship? I'll answer that for you. One has the materials to make fuel for a return trip and the other does not. You tell me which needs more fuel. Before you answer, just know that a rocket doesn't use it's thrust for the whole trip. They get up to speed and cruise until it's time to slow down.

@baekkistyle

4 ай бұрын

@@TheDwightMamba the one who needs to reach escape velocity to leave earth needs more fuel, basic physics mate, the fuel needed to get back from the moon is negligible. And the making enough fuel on Mars to go back is another hyperloop.

The gravity on Mars is just under 40% that of Earth, so it definitely is a gravity well. There’s also the issue of the change in velocity needed to drop from Mars’ orbit to that of Earth.

@4Lucy_

4 ай бұрын

Shhhh- dont tell the elon fans

@PatsRule1224

4 ай бұрын

Oh shit everyone, annasdad8008 thought of something the scientists forgot! The whole plan is shot now

@fomori2

4 ай бұрын

@@PatsRule1224 Why dont you attack their argument instead of their character... Oh that is right, thinking is hard, but I believe you'll be able to do it someday.

@PatsRule1224

4 ай бұрын

@@fomori2 what argument? Lmao

@annasdad8008

4 ай бұрын

@@4Lucy_ Musk has already identified and addressed these issues. His plans very specifically take them into account. The issue here isn’t the SpaceX plane for going to Mars, it is the poorly written script for this video. Maybe you should check such facts before criticizing someone else.

Sounds like a job for Helldivers

Long journey to the red planet💀

In my 7 years of studying aeronautical and space engineering, i never heard that mars does not have gravity 😅

@AlexE5250

3 ай бұрын

She didn’t say no gravity. She said no large gravity well. The energy required to escape mars is much smaller than that of earth

@Blade2point0

2 ай бұрын

Maybe you should get a refund

@DeepSnowRider

2 ай бұрын

Kingduff where did you study, community college for 7 years. Video clearly says no deep gravity well to escape from. Maybe learning to read is an issue for you

@tekman2000

2 ай бұрын

Yes, it’s all downhill from there. (Ahahahahahaha) 😂

@vince7207

2 ай бұрын

You didn't learn how to read comprehensively though I see.

It will actually take six to eight flights to refuel an interplanetary Starship in orbit. Cryogenic liquid fuels are heavier than water, and although the payload capacity of Starship is huge only a very small portion could actually be used for hauling fuel due simply to a limit on mass deliverable to LEO. Alternatively what could happen is SpaceX sends up fueling missions more or less constantly, refiling an orbital depot, and it's this depot that the outbound Starships mate with.

@jonesrichardmr

4 ай бұрын

NASAs own estimates for a flight to the Moon, is 11-15 refuelling launches, for 1 landing on the Moon. Mars, sure, you can do some aerobreaking, etc. But also has significantly higher gravity for a propulsive landing. All this, and Starship hasn't even made it to orbit yet...

@gownerjones

4 ай бұрын

Good luck doing that with a spaceship that hasn't seen space even once and prefers to blow up on launch. It is absolutely pathetic that SpaceX is still struggling, in 2024, with technology the USSR perfected half a century ago.

"Locally produced methane" Start fartn boys! We gotta make it back home!

Elon must be crying 😢 right now. His entire operation is defined in 30 seconds 😂❤😂

Sounds like a really expensive way just to kill some astronauts.

@rabusmccaleb7944

4 ай бұрын

I’m curious, 1 million years on the future, would you like humanity to be only Earth bound? I’m asking sincerely. No matter, your response I will just say “okay”. Because this as an objective to me seems obvious, but people with your perspective don’t seem to think this should be a goal of humanity

@syrobyte8493

4 ай бұрын

You don’t need to be a multi planetary species before you perfect the original planet, in other words why waste money on going to a worse planet than fix the problems on the current one

@dies200

4 ай бұрын

​@@rabusmccaleb7944the problem isn't interplanetary settlement. The problem is rushing to mars because it sounds cool. Right now there's no real advantage for us going to mars. That Artemis program has the much more sensible goal of establishing a permanent human presence on the moon. That way we can continue our research into colonisation, build infrastructure in orbit of the moon and actually prepare for missions to mars

@tsvetanstoychev655

4 ай бұрын

@@dies200 Again, Why? The moon....

@losttranslation8766

4 ай бұрын

Why go across the atlantic when we have land in Europe and European issues to deal with first. Thats you 500 years ago. ​@dies200

Imagine they could have already finished starship rn if he had funded SpaceX with 44 billion instead of twitter 💀

@northernhemisphere4906

Жыл бұрын

dank means are worthless, i mean priceless😅

@MySquishable

Жыл бұрын

No cuz then twitter would have roasted SpaceX until they went bankrupt

@dereksavauge6613

Жыл бұрын

Ikr? He’s down to his last 250 billion. Idk how space x will survive

@adamoverman-iv4sn

Жыл бұрын

Or sending the money to Ukraine. 😂

@santoshsharmaadhikari3623

Жыл бұрын

The way people are against him and his company i think he ahould scrap Spacex and let china ave the way into the future

Thrust in the vacuum of space. Lol

It was a good decision to leave behind one spaceship to mars before we came to earth.

You can imagine the party they would have on Mars if they used Ethanol as fuel 🥃💃🕺🏻🪅

The key thing is, it will take MANY flights to get enough fuel to the tanker starship. I've heard 6 or more

@whattheschmidt

3 ай бұрын

How many tons of fuel are in Starship? 100 to 150 ton cargo capacity. I thought it was 3 to 5 to refuel.

@Vatsyayana87

3 ай бұрын

I dont know about a "key thing". Its just part of the plan.. Its necessary sure, so is every other step in the process. But its not one of the hard parts of the plan. It will just become a routine thing like the starlink launches that happen up to three times in a day.

@ianirwin9480

3 ай бұрын

The plan for Starship Artemis mission to the moon already requires 9+ refueling missions, because of fuel boil-off between tanker launches

@MrBuyerman

2 ай бұрын

Approx 24 tankers per 1 moon mission. 😂😂😂. Reusable...Sure!!!!!!

@christhorney

2 ай бұрын

thats just to get it to the moon and not mars, and its over 10, and yes, the whole mission idea is stupid

They just fogot to mention that instead of a single starship tanker, there will be a fleet of them 😉

@johngabrielvillanueva3860

3 ай бұрын

It is called process, in more simplified explanation, it means step by step...

@nagualdesign

3 ай бұрын

Probably a dozen or so to refuel one Starship in LEO before heading for Mars _on its first interplanetary test flight._ And presumably there will be a dozen or so unmanned flights before it's human rated. Lot of money. Some would call it brute force, but if that's what it takes that's what it takes. Because Elon wants to be the man who made humanity interplanetary. 😊

@dariuszscharsig568

3 ай бұрын

@@nagualdesignI've heard it's like 10000 starships.

@agradableRoma

3 ай бұрын

Elon va a terminar en bancarrota antes de tener una flota de naves​@@nagualdesign

@Vatsyayana87

3 ай бұрын

I dont know if i call a bunch of single launches a "fleet" but yes there will be several launches to refuel it. It could be done with a single vehicle. So fleet might be inaccurate. Your wink makes it clear that you are suggesting they are hiding something here. Its inaccurate in its simplicity of the process sure, but its a simple concept video and its accurate as such.

So you are telling me a single rocket motor is going to be capable of not only escaping Mars's orbit but then also reaching Earth AND THEN slowing down enough to land? The amount of fuel required would be impractical.

Star ships that make it to mars should stay 🏡🕷️🫚🥗🌊👂🪬🚀

A moon base comes first. ;)

@chromemox3319

Жыл бұрын

That would be a much better launch point than Earth.

@Lifeislyfe

4 ай бұрын

It’s already there bro.

Why do those two starships together look like Love bugs? 😂

Looks and sounds easy when you put it that way

Wow. The announcer sounds like a real expert and with dat muzak playing, I so exited. I'll just bust open me piggy bank and get me a ticket then I go to Mars too wit a ham sammich, can o soda, and an extra pair o underwear's.🤪

@nightmarestudios.4833

Жыл бұрын

Boomer energy

dude can barely run twitter rn

@LuskyMJ

Жыл бұрын

He literally intended for Twitter to be in the state that it's in right now since the first time he even hinted at wanting to buy it.

@LA-eq4mm

Жыл бұрын

does barely run twitter mean function the exact same as it always has?

@insultmeifyouhategod4167

Жыл бұрын

I’m glad twitters shutting down

@brokolosbinala2970

Жыл бұрын

The amount of stupidity this comment radiates is enough to temporarily shut down 80% of my brain cells

@Vaynthegreat

Жыл бұрын

Education not indoctrination. Twitter is and was a popular tool for politicians, celebrities and journalists. But as a business, it was stagnating. It hasn't booked an annual profit since 2019, and posted a loss in eight years of the past decade. The company's net loss narrowed in 2021, to $221.4 million from $1.14 billion the previous year.

If space is a vacuum... why isnt earths atmosphere sucked out into space in a heartbeat?

@alphanerd2305

2 күн бұрын

The answer depends on who you ask.

It’s like the fox the chicken and the man trying to cross a river.

its like waiting on a bus..in the rain, thunder and lightening ....waiting on Starship

it's 2022 and we still don't have a proper space station and a fuel station.

@mdcclxxviepluribusunum1066

Жыл бұрын

What are they needed for here?

@Gfysimpletons

Жыл бұрын

@@mdcclxxviepluribusunum1066 pizza and beer

@zod8015

Жыл бұрын

Because humanity has only one Elon Musk.

@slender5738

5 ай бұрын

​@@zod8015which humanity

Love the Thunder Birds tech in this vid

Construction workers gon have it rough

"Then a miracle occured" Camouflaged in a sneaky manner .

remember when she voiced Morty's mom in Rick & Morty? 😊🫡

What I wanna know is how uber, skip the dishes and lift are gonna work in between mars and earth !!!!

@panampace

3 ай бұрын

KZreadrs in 3023: Ordering Taco Bell from earth to my Mars apartment for 2 trillion dollars!

@ozz3790

3 ай бұрын

@@panampace yeppp

I'm ready to move to Mars if everything happens just like shown in this video. Just as long as it took in this video.

@bidet1098

5 ай бұрын

Bruh if it only takes 18 seconds to go to Mars, I'd rather go there than commute to work

Imagine you are on Mars and Musk controls your air?

@Isabel-cr3sp

Жыл бұрын

We would all be dead

@dan797

5 ай бұрын

And then he has a hissy fit

@Emma-Maze

4 ай бұрын

If psychos like him could own and sell the breathable air here on earth they absolutely would, like they're already doing with other basic human necessities.

@nomandoerr874

4 ай бұрын

"Damnit Musk, tun on de AIR!"

Space may be the final frontear but its made in a hollywood basement🎸🎶🎶🎶

This video is inspired by the Netflix series "Three body problems" so chill 😂😂😂

We'll be dead by the time this design is ready

@Jeremy9697

3 ай бұрын

Why? Are you like 90 or something?

@cppxaxa

3 ай бұрын

@@Jeremy9697 Thanks for the hopeful comment, I can live 30 more years

@KMWhity

3 ай бұрын

Considering how fast SpaceX is developing Rocket technology and In general AI, it will be about 10 years when humans land in Mars. The return journey is going to be tricky one though.

@paintspot1509

3 ай бұрын

​@Jeremy9697 we are at least 100 years from achieving this.

@paintspot1509

3 ай бұрын

​@@KMWhity absolute nonsense.

Time to watch Total Recall again, get my Mars lingo down.

You mean the moon can't even be a gas station. Poor discarded moon he's thinking what the hell I was first in line .

Return trip? We'll figure that out when you get there 😉🙊

@sid35gb

Жыл бұрын

The crew that sets up the methane plant won’t be coming home.

@treasurehunter3744

7 ай бұрын

​@@sid35gbcrew? We've got robots that can flip switches. We don't need a crew to make methane on Mars.

Must be really real. This animation proves it.

@c0rtikoZteroids1

Жыл бұрын

What are you implying?

@mdcclxxviepluribusunum1066

Жыл бұрын

@@c0rtikoZteroids1what do you think they’re implying? It’s pretty obvious

@pada443

Жыл бұрын

@@c0rtikoZteroids1 They aren't smart enough to know how to imply anything

Looks like the first trip will have to be 1 starship full of methane to mars.

Elon will start a tour company and offer 2 week vacations.

Bon voyage to whoever want's to go there, I love the earth and will stay here.

Well done camera man

❌ Get Us to Mars ✅ Get future generation to Mars.

Sounds like a pipe dream.

How to use precious Earth's resources to waste it on a planet hostile to life.

@davidbarton1806

Жыл бұрын

Because it's make believe And Because they love wasting things so they can say all the resources are running out hence the price spikes

@moji96

Жыл бұрын

People have been wasting resources ever since people were people. Let's not pretend we're virtuous now, shall we? 😅

@davidbarton1806

Жыл бұрын

@@moji96 I'm not being Virtuous I'm just trying to be honest unlike the scientific community who shows cartoons to adults and they actually believe it

if refueling stage fails, that’s REALLLYYY bad

@Achillionable

4 ай бұрын

Well if any stage fails it's really bad...

@Heligoland360

4 ай бұрын

Not really. It's done in low Earth Orbit. If refueling fails, they just return.

This is a pretty bold presentation

Sounds like a lot of locally produced HOT AIR...

I never knew that both planets weren't moving through space.

That will be cool to see a starship in a museum one day that has sat on Mars.

“Will” is very lightly used here

All is based on probability, anything can go wrong! Especially with Murphy's law!

What the hell!!! I cannot get over how close Mars is to us!!

For everyone complaining about the starship already on mars: it’s because time goes in reverse on mars. The ship leaves at the same time it arrives because it landed then went back in time a little.

@MarvelMania677

4 ай бұрын

What the stupidity are you blabbing about

Just send someone that wants to be the first cadaver on mars. 😂

The music was so, so close to pvz

sometimes you get fuel. Sometimes fuel misses you and you have to drift away in space

@user-ow1mc9hd9m

4 ай бұрын

Or one tiny thing goes wrong and it bumps into you and bounces off, now you all get sucked out into the voids of space.

@Jeremy9697

3 ай бұрын

I don't think either of you understand how docking in space work. The iss have done this over a dozen times. They have huge distances to make adjustments until meeting up.

@lothric9081

3 ай бұрын

​@@user-ow1mc9hd9m Blown, not sucked

And you trust the Twitter king to do this?...

@alfiedefreitas6860

Жыл бұрын

Yes since he has already dominated the space market which the most successful rocket (falcon nine) nearing 200 launches and the starship program is nearing its first orbital flight.

@insultmeifyouhategod4167

Жыл бұрын

You can’t judge him by the way he ran one company

@titanspider1

Жыл бұрын

Yes

@DaDaDo661

Жыл бұрын

Another Elon bad bot. Everyone thinks they are smarter than him.

@spoilerwarning8383

Жыл бұрын

Regardless of what he is doing with twitter, you cant deny his achievements in space industry

It took me way too long to realize that there wasn't going to be giant launch pads hovering above Earth and Mars with giant rockets.

Not quite, but kind of close enough I guess.

The part you got wrong is- The crewed starship has to meet up (in orbit) To top off the fuel tanks with *EIGHT STARSHIP TANKERS* once eight fuel transfers have been completed the crewed starship can start its journey to Mars. Elon makes it sound trivial in regards to creating rocket fuel from the Mars resources. If creating rocket fuel from the Martian atmosphere and regolith (AKA dirt) is viable. Then why hasn't he created his own jet fuel on Earth?

@dave2715

Жыл бұрын

The whole thing is BS! Rockets cannot produce forward momentum in a vacuum!

@xlynx9

Жыл бұрын

Because on Earth you can just order a delivery... That is, making it yourself is not necessarily the fastest nor cheapest way.

@pada443

Жыл бұрын

@Dave Wow are confidently incorrect. You should go back to gradeschool and learn about Newton's laws of motion.

@subwarpspeed

Жыл бұрын

I did think they put up one tanker starship that gets refueled by many other tankers until full, after that launch the crew starship and transfer all the fuel they need from the tanker in orbit. Starship doesn't use "jet fuel" as a propellant...

@dave2715

Жыл бұрын

@@pada443 My Dear Pa da you should watch the experiment if a feather and fan in a vacuum chamber! Newton has been proved wrong on many occasions. Maybe you should keep up with science of today not yesterdays?

I'm early does newsthink reply? Also love your channel