Exclusive content, privileges & more - Subscribe to ThePrint for special benefits: theprint.in/subscribe/

@CoronaForever486

24 күн бұрын

lol even the NYT prints more truth that this foreign funded blatantly anti India print. Gupta's going rate is just a few lakhs.

@lokalnewz3168

24 күн бұрын

BJP chamcha

@grapeshott

24 күн бұрын

More stereotyping Muslim women by showing hijab picture. Most Muslims don't wear a hijab. Just go the Bengal for example

@CoronaForever486

24 күн бұрын

@@grapeshott yeah, most muslim women actually help their muslim men molest non muslim women, they have no morals, Bengal is best example.

@CoronaForever486

24 күн бұрын

When im bored and want to read biased, illogical, and complete lies, for fun, i see what theprint has written.

Rajiv Gandhi Screwed Muslim woman in favor of Muslim Men and the same Muslim women still vote for Congress. 😮😮😮

@revathyshankar8

24 күн бұрын

Women are still sex slaves in Muslims

@user-pz6sx7ir1p

24 күн бұрын

it was because his mother was screwed by many moslem men, hence he new the beauty of the religion first hand.

@1008apocalypse1008

24 күн бұрын

Peaceful community never disappoints

@SushmaVivek-xq4nv

24 күн бұрын

Its called politics.... from rule book of British... Divide and rule

@niteshsarkar

24 күн бұрын

You are stupid to think people care about the past when they feel existential threats today.

India is fortunate that now neither Rajiv Gandhi nor his wife/son is not in power. Otherwise they would have brought another law to nullify this judgement.

@ChandranPrema123

24 күн бұрын

Nah it can't happen with 99 seats😂

@user-pz6sx7ir1p

24 күн бұрын

@@ChandranPrema123 but in madarasa 99 is greater than 242.

@K.Saflin

24 күн бұрын

@amitavasaha2851 Yup...Now Cows are more important than women...😌

@kalathiaga

24 күн бұрын

Oh, let them be. If their faith is more important than the welfare of their family ... Vinasha kale bibhareeda buddhi

@Democrazee

24 күн бұрын

Cows to women is no good for sure …..but women to crap is more than despicable 😢

Maulana Rahul Khan will protest against it.

@nissarguru-xg1wx

23 күн бұрын

No. He will tell the Maulanas to keep quiet. He will think protest against this will strengthen Hindutva.

@shubhamkumar-nw1ui

23 күн бұрын

Maulanas will ditch Rahul then .For them Rahul is not above Sharia.

@sohebrehman5967

23 күн бұрын

​@shubhamkumar-nw1ui Yes, Even Sanghi Modi also.

@DailyHacksAlpha

18 күн бұрын

He wanna but cant..

@shobhitdagur1086

16 күн бұрын

They can try and watch there fate ​@@sohebrehman5967

This judgement is big slap to Congress party, who misused majority for changing constitution.

@Avinashm7

24 күн бұрын

Dumbo what changed constitution

@rajshekhar1147

24 күн бұрын

No this judgement is a big slap on BJP. This judgement says that the 1986 Act is just another option to seek maintenance and the divorced woman has right to seek maintenance under old law or new law or under both laws.

@narendramarkale7908

24 күн бұрын

@@rajshekhar1147 don't misguide the judgment clearly states that if she doesn't get enough Meher after iddat period from her husband she is at liberty to opt for 125 Cr.p.c which right was taken away by Rajiv Gandhi by enacting the law

@DoleshSao

24 күн бұрын

​@@Avinashm7 either u are a big fool or think everyone else is a fool😂😂 Anyways every congressi is like that, you are no exception. Typical "Jaahil"

@basuh7526

24 күн бұрын

​@@rajshekhar1147😅🤣😂

Bring in UCC and remove the draconian Waqf Act!

@A4Aqua

24 күн бұрын

What is the use of UCC if there are hundreds of exception clauses are going to be there.

@madhureddy3945

24 күн бұрын

Time has come to declare the waqf properties as encroached properties.

@shankarswamidayal5070

22 күн бұрын

The Central Government/ NDA government/ Modi Sarkaar have no guts to carry out any drastic changes..no point expecting anything positive from these Secular Hindus..bunch of cowards who bow down to M K Gandhi and appreciate Nehru selectively..this constitution is anti India anti Hindu, we need a leader who can claim that this constitution is not acceptable and should dump Gandhi Nehru and Ambedkar

Maulana Rahul will say democracy is dead in supreme court

@binakhimji6509

24 күн бұрын

Maulana Rahul Khan

@gouravdamor8001

24 күн бұрын

Bade bewaloof aadmi ho yarr .

@thecomment9489

24 күн бұрын

LOL. He will also say save constitution from the Supreme court. How ironic.

@Hanamantaray

24 күн бұрын

@@thecomment9489 his father did the same thing 4 decade ago

Modi Govt needs to act on this God sent opportunity and reverse the Rajiv Gandhi Law and implement at least some form of uniform civil code.

@ChandranPrema123

24 күн бұрын

Exactly but the Kukis in Manipur will revolt because you know😅

@astee.007

24 күн бұрын

Actually in my view modi should never bring UCC bcz if someone wants to be in shit I think we should let it be.

@surendrakamath9580

24 күн бұрын

⁠true..I also think if a community wants to live in gutter, let them live..!!

@satyasingal

24 күн бұрын

Modi Govt. need not take any action. SC has invoked Section 125 Cr. P. C for all divorced women without religious discrimination.

@astee.007

24 күн бұрын

@@satyasingal modi should bring an amendment to overturn it, people don't need something that they don't understand or desire.

Polygamy is still legal for muslim men in secular India. Let that sink in.😂😂

@GoodCitizen-eh1id

23 күн бұрын

Also Halala , and fluid relationship

@garygeorge-wi7co

16 күн бұрын

@@GoodCitizen-eh1id Polygamy is such a lovely idea. I wish all countries had this law.

It is a tragedy that we even have to discuss these things in courts in India. It is 2024 😅

@user-ox3mn5eu2l

21 күн бұрын

Read quran...Muslim still lives in 6th century...if you don't beleive hit a like for an ostrich

Supreme Court took 38 years to settle on Section 125 Cr. P.C, though it was a uniform Section without religious discrimination.

@mohamedali2858

24 күн бұрын

@@satyasingal If the highest person in the hierarchy of power incites against a group in society, then what religious discrimination are you talking about? Modi said ‘Those with more children’ During an election rally on April 21 in the western state of Rajasthan, Modi claimed that if the Congress party came to power, it would distribute the country’s wealth among Muslims. “When they were last in power, the Congress said that Muslims have the first right to the nation’s resources. What does that mean? If they come to power, that means they will collect all the wealth. And who will they give it to? Those who have more children. To infiltrators.” Yogi one of 7 kids Modi one of 6 kids Advani one of 8 kids Togadia one of 9kids

@shankares388

23 күн бұрын

@@mohamedali2858 🤣🤣🤣since Modi is one of 6 kids why are you worried? shameless and pathetic to core.

@satyasingal

22 күн бұрын

@@mohamedali2858 I didn’t like Modi’s speeches in the campaign for general elections. I had commented that the BJP will not get majority.

Secularism for getting social benefits. Sharia for escaping personal Responsibilities.

The more i learn about Rajeev Gandhi the worse it gets. What an ego trip this laadla was on

@CoronaForever486

24 күн бұрын

see his laadla, even bigger trips

@AdiChintalapati

24 күн бұрын

He was a much bigger pappu than the current pappu. Its just that people of the times did not have this kind of awareness due to lack of technology and social media

@BGMi-fi9yr

19 күн бұрын

Rajiv screwed Srilanka...he did muslim appeasment...and his Wife Nazi daughter forced PV narasimha rao to bring Waqf...pwct

Did you mention that Rajiv Gandhi “amended the constitution” to overturn SC verdict in the Shah Bano case? The constitution which is so dear to the congress these days?

Well "Khangress" led by Pappu, Kharge, Akhilesh, etc. must shout and do dharna in front of Supreme Court. Along with dynasty bootlicker

@thecomment9489

24 күн бұрын

And that TMC lady shout also shout that how even court has become fascist because she only sees fascism everywhere.

It is a shame to have religion based laws in a secular country

@s-qc9ns

24 күн бұрын

Shame shame

@paulm.k.8740

24 күн бұрын

…a secular country, where the prime minister also acts as prime pujaari!

@thecomment9489

24 күн бұрын

I think in time Hindus will have to demand a separate country.

@shankares388

23 күн бұрын

@@paulm.k.8740 when previous PMs put skull caps & attended EID were they pujaris too? or Indian PM hosting terrorist Yasin Malik?? religious fanatics like you are a curse to India

@user-qz3to7gd5l

23 күн бұрын

@@paulm.k.8740 A secular country where Waqf board(religious Intuition) hold 3rd highest land and real estate in nation

Time for Waqf to get nullified.

It was not secular law it was sickular law

Polygamy should be next, if sc pass order that ban all kind polygamy will have more acceptance than govt bringing any such law

Sad that even for such logical decisions BJP does not have the balls to pass legislation.😒😒😒 Always require Supreme Court to do their job

Muslim women must be thankful that Modi is in power.

@CSim50

15 күн бұрын

Whether it is Congress or BJP it is always about Muslims getting a better deal in India. What about compensation for Kashmiri Pandits??

If giving rights to women makes people angry.. there is some clear introspection that needs to be done in Muslim community.

@junaidbhat06

22 күн бұрын

If u marry and girl wants divoce and takes ur half wealth as alimony is that fine ?

@dollartreeshark6786

22 күн бұрын

@@junaidbhat06if the girls wants divorce she can take half the earnings you have earned, not your parents. She has equal share of your earnings. Is that the reason why Muslims relegate girls to kitchen and not be earning so you can financially crush her?

@vishalbajaj4231

21 күн бұрын

​@@junaidbhat06 point is that law should be same for everyone. You can't be treated differently because of religion. It causes social divide.

@darshansharma3694

18 күн бұрын

​@@junaidbhat06there is different in muslim community that women cannot give divorce to men so muslim men should give half of his property and monthly allowance

@garygeorge-wi7co

16 күн бұрын

@@junaidbhat06 That is in every western country you love to emigrate.

Today there will be no protests by Muslims against this judgement. Times have changed since Rajiv Gandhi threw Muslim women under the bus. This is the change for modernity that Modi has brought among Muslims.

Parliament must reverse every unconstitutional law imposed by the accursed Nehru family.

Muslims must accept this judgement and should not do what they have done during the Shahbano case. That was a terrible mistake. That Shahbano case allowed BJP to become a party of 303 from a party of 2. Ram Mandir Andolan was going for long and it would not have got that much attention of this were not done. Muslims should think that those "500 rs" were the cause of those lyn_ching, big_otry and most importantly Modi is 3rd time PM bcz of this only. Also, Rajiv Gandhi has done a terrible thing by coming under the influence of muslim clerics. I don't think Sonia Gandhi will do this mistake and Congress will and should not oppose this judgement. They should remain silent on this and let court take this forward. Rashid Alvi said sometime back that Sonia Gandhi told Rajiv about suppressing the judgement that "You are not able to convince me. How are you going to convince everyone else?".

@oyehoyemon2286

24 күн бұрын

Though I diasagree with your interpretations on BJP's rise and policies, I couldn't agree more on respecting judgements and rule of law. We need bipartisan support on this and happy to see folks from Congressi side too recognising the need to uphold justice :)

@nv9991

24 күн бұрын

Did Sonia reverser that "Rajiv stupidity" in her 10 years of rule? So how are you sure she was opposed to it? If she was opposed to it, she would have reversed it in her rule.

@swapneelbehera260

24 күн бұрын

Na BJP's rise was for them being an outright better party than congress well mostly.

It is time Congress leaves muslim appeasement policy and address all community's issues...

@swapneelbehera260

24 күн бұрын

Not happening it's their core vote base it's modi who should stop muslim outreach and treat everyone equally with more focus on his own core vote base of he wants bjp to go past 300 in 2029.

@joshuacherian6718

24 күн бұрын

​@@swapneelbehera260 Modi maynot complete a year in office.. As per current trends. It's my opinion.. no bias

@niharikakhare8763

23 күн бұрын

They should definitely promote compulsory education.

@swapneelbehera260

23 күн бұрын

@@joshuacherian6718 well I know for a fact you are/will be proven wrong no bias.

@joshuacherian6718

23 күн бұрын

@@swapneelbehera260 Lets see..

Through various cases SC should force Islam to much needed reforms in a Modern Era like Hinduism went through so much reforms in the past. Specially Gender Equality ( for men & women both)

@mohamedali2858

24 күн бұрын

@@Xen-wy6bo Islam fought against the Sasanian Persian Empire, the Eastern Roman Empire, Byzantium, the Western Holy Roman Empire, the Tartar Mongols, the African Ghanaian, the Abyssinian Empire, the Indian Goeta, the Austro-Hungarian, the Serbian, the Russian Caesarean, the English, the French, the Castilian Spanish, the Portuguese, the Dutch of Orange, the Crusader Alliance, the Vikings, the (Fatimid) slave state, the Qarmatian , the Visigothic kingdom, the fascist Italian empire...etc. And many others, and there is still an idiot who thinks that he will reform & destroy Islam & thinks that it’s history is shallow .and The high rate of rape in Delhi is evidence of gender inequality.

@user-pz6sx7ir1p

24 күн бұрын

@DhsA

24 күн бұрын

Yes. I agree. That's the only way since the muslims are so reluctant to accept any change in islam. Such blind adherence to a book is going to be detrimental for them.

@niharikakhare8763

23 күн бұрын

Totally agree with you.

@mohamedali2858

23 күн бұрын

@@niharikakhare8763 Do you accept that some Muslim judges reformulate your religion? Are you aware of what you agree to?

Shah Bano ji might got "Shanti" Today 💐💐

Overturning the Shah Bano judgment by Congress led directly to Ram Janmabhoomi movement.

"Modi Govt needs to act on this God sent opportunity and reverse the Rajiv Gandhi Law and implement at least some form of uniform civil code."

4 wives 😂😂karonaa aab... Abdul crying 😂 of 4 Shadi kaisey karengey😅

@HistoryOfBharat

24 күн бұрын

Ek baat bata. Tumlog Auraton ko haq milane se khush hota hai ya fir muslim mardon se wo sab chheen jaata hai, jo tumlog nahin kar skat, usase? Waise thoda padh likh le. 4 wife agar ish judgement se pahale wo rakh skate the to abhi v rakh skate hain. Matlab kuchh samjhana nahin hai, bas Dialogue maar dena hai.

@ChandranPrema123

24 күн бұрын

Now Muslim Marriage act is practically useless Lol Lol😂

@ChandranPrema123

24 күн бұрын

​@@HistoryOfBharatyou are in India not Pakistan

@HistoryOfBharat

24 күн бұрын

@@ChandranPrema123 Tum Pakistan me hai kya?

@user-pz6sx7ir1p

24 күн бұрын

kyon payal, gauri, kareena, sonakshi, sharmila kama hain kya. paise ke liye to koi bhi kafir laundiya khol deti hai.

What will Pappu , his 99 associates and the holy alliance of conveniences do with 99 page SC verdict of the Hon. Court.. Now he has to open his mouth on this as also as to how his father had galvanise the sectarian votes in his favour.

Rajiv Gandhi's decision was a mistake. UCC is the need of the hour for Indian Muslims. Any religion can not be unchanging over time. A religion and religious law is not supposed to pander to a few fanatics at the cost of the masses.

Bar dancer party and German shepherd applying Burnol and trying to picture this verdict as anti Muslim 😂

RG was spine less m community lover so could not see female issues rather shows back to all womens in that community

Bharath Muslims should respect courts and Constitution ; Any grievances to be taken up with courts only and not in the streets ; Rahul khan may instigate street protests ;

@CoronaForever486

24 күн бұрын

Please understand that when the muslims consider islam as higher over Bharat, there are no Bharat muslims, only muslims and they dont respect Bharat, and never have.

@thecomment9489

24 күн бұрын

Rahul Khan 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 His party was also involved in thirst state sponsored pogroms against the Sikhs as well. That was probably the first such situation in any part of Asia.

why the fuck the Supreme Court not scrapped this law 1986 section 125 instead of giving judgment overriding the law. Supreme Court ki fhati hai ?

Nazma Heptulah might now support UCC today for her benefit and try to sound modern. People, both Hindus and Muslimz should understand this. Now the irony is, both Nazma and Aarif mohmmad Khan are in BJP. Only person who has moral right is, Arif Mohammad Khan, not other muslim leaders.

Uniform Civil Code now🔥🔥🔥

Congress and muslims are that husband and wife who fight but go back to each other during elections

Bad it sounds..but Rajiv Gandhi removal was a blessing in disguise for this country.

Why did the supreme court not strike down the new law in 1986, as it's against basic human rights.

@thecomment9489

24 күн бұрын

Because in India if a law is made in parliament then it cannot be overruled. This is my understanding of how our constitution works.

@SP-oc7dm

24 күн бұрын

@@thecomment9489 , as far as I understand, after the parliament passes a law, it goes for supreme court approval.

@desibigfoot3874

23 күн бұрын

They also see political climate before passing laws. See all landmark judgements and the governments in power at that time. So much for sanctity of supreme court.

@cs-mi8ur

23 күн бұрын

This law isn't against constitution.Same way the different age of marriage isn't.

@bahaar2825

22 күн бұрын

Basic human right is different and marriage protection right different.

Rahul & Congress should come out and support the judgement in letter and spirit. Let's be honest.

@thecomment9489

24 күн бұрын

His constitution saving is only selective.

BJP don't believe in Secularism, if they believe in Secular value, than they should reverse this decision like my father: Rahul Gandhi

For Congress Vote first Country Later 😢

@CoronaForever486

24 күн бұрын

For Congress Vote first Country NEVER

Good job supreme court

Raniv forgotten humanity for vote bank politics!? With out compensation by throwing shabanu on road on society!? At the damd time disrespected SC judgement and Constitution with his majority amending!?

If Muslim party congress were in power they would have declined this SC judgement just like rahul khan's father

Finally SC got the guts to make the right judgement

It took SC ,40 years to overrule a bad law. That means judiciary needs executive support to arrive to even righteous judgement.which is currently it has for this judgement. So does judiciary really free in india. I dont think so

4:48 muslim marriage is a contract. 👍

Government should always do the right thing and not worry about a community. Many reforms in Hindu society were done and people finally realise the benefit of progressive reforms. Although I don’t have hope for a particular community

Maulana's are very sad by this Supreme court ruling and Many Muslims dream to do polygamy has been shattered completely.

Rajiv Gandhi did 400 par during 80s and passed Shah Bano act 😂. Power of 400 par sarkar.

More stereotyping Muslim women by showing hijab picture. Most Muslims don't wear a hijab. Just go the Bengal for example...

@indiamusically

24 күн бұрын

Why less Indian muslim women wore hijab in 1950s, 1960s, to 2000s? At most they would cover head, now face cover has become more n more prominent? WHy this change? I m bengali, ask you grandparents- how many muslim women with face cover they saw during their youth, even in muslim dominated areas, and how many we see today?

Congress always acted in the most selfish and shortsighted manner of governance when ever in power. A progressive and humanely liberal way of life was never envisaged in any of their leaders thought process.

Great judgement. Opens the way for a UCC which should be done right away. Would be interesting to read Shekhar’s cover story in 1986 given is extreme leftist views and being a Congress stooge.

Law should be blind to caste, religion and race. Good step forward.

Muslims do not like amending Muslim personal laws . why Muslims accept RAJEEV Gandhi's amendment of law against shara Banu case.

@sram5308

18 күн бұрын

because secularism prevails only when it is against women.

It is shame that why some called Rajiv Gandhi as a modern man who brought computer in India. But he was junjlee.. He was not modern but man living in medival times.. Congress took each decision in favour of muslim vote bank.... Congress party is a termite to indian democracy

@thecomment9489

24 күн бұрын

Even to this date there is not one single person in the royal family who can speak the most spoken language of the country perfectly. They all speak as if some foreigner trying to speak Hindi. And they claim to represent the country.

@namastelounge3863

24 күн бұрын

You are disrespecting the termite !

Thankfully muslim veto no longer works in india🙏

Mistake was by shahbano or the so many women affected not to challenge the illegal RG act

Shekharuddin Qadri

ucc is coming !!

Mr. Sekhar Gupta, Are you really pleased by the present judgement.?

Rajeev was in the forefront and was actively backed by our Chameleon Communists ( Jyoti Basu, Surajit & Co.), blunt Socialists (Lalu- Mulayam & Co.) and the likes. Shame in all of them. Modi Ji certainly don't initiate that mischievous STUPIDITY.

Pappu's father will again change......

@thecomment9489

24 күн бұрын

WTF

Congress's appeasement vote bank politics helps the Muslim male ego but hurts a lot of ordinary Muslim women.

He is crying. But why? Something good is finally happening for Muslim women. It’s time the clergy and Muslim men stop harassing their women under rhetorical name of religion.

If the Supreme Court can blunt Rajiv Gandhi's '86 act now, why couldn't it do so then?

Muslims: we want secularism, just not for us 😂

We understand your loyalty toward INC. So other important issues we confident that you will take this issue.

If pak upgrade it and we fail to do it for votes..kangress did gross injustices to the nation and community..shame..shame

Such a great explanation of such complex issue. Let’s see if govt wakes up and removes this law :)

@prakashtiwari8003

24 күн бұрын

Fascist government

"Secularism for getting social benefits. Sharia for escaping personal Responsibilities."

Muslim women should come forward… but unfortunately women like Saba Naqvi are more interested in hating Modi than talking about their own community and their uplift

I thought India was in a secular country. What is this muslim law?

I don't think this was enough. SC should have set an example out of Rajiv Gandhi to prevent any future PM from overturning SC order for political gain. I know u shouldn't talk bad about dead and especially a man who dies for the country but still, u cannot KILL DEMOCRACY like this by overturning a JUST ruling of SC

Alimony and dowry should be illegal. This is era of equality.

@tushar_ranjan7

24 күн бұрын

Alimony is needed. Dowry not.

@junaidbhat06

22 күн бұрын

​@@tushar_ranjan7 y if u get divoce and ur wife takes ur wealth y

Shekhar Gupta ji, by your narration, you contradict your own convictions in various write ups and videos that Muslims Vote is a myth and they don't vote unitedly. You are now convinced that Muslim votes consolidate. Needless to add, that there is need to consolidate Hindu votes and you journalists should not criticize parties that canvass on religious lines

@thecomment9489

24 күн бұрын

Shekhar Gu jis narrative keeps changing as per the propaganda he is doing.

Maulana Gupta ji 😂

Now shouldn't that law be scrapped? After all it was a politically influenced law.

Excellent, Shekhar ji

Is it not that SC wish to open a window to UCC in a way?

400 plus seats and rajiv decided to do this😢😢😢😢

The judgement is good but what about a working woman giving divorce to her husband? In this case, will the husband be eligible for alimony too? Or is it just a one way traffic?

@thecomment9489

24 күн бұрын

Well yes in modern times this should be given a thought.

Another masterpiece by Shekhar. Shekhar I don't understand , why our judiciary is so incompetent that it always comes under pressure despite having so much autonomy and power as compared to other democracies ????

If the law passed by Shri Rajive Gandhi still exists how Supreme Court pass a contradictory judgement ? They are supposed to work within the ambit of the law

@maheshdocherla

21 күн бұрын

This judgement didn't contradict that law. It says the choice is with the woman because Rajiv Gandhi's law DID NOT MAKE IT EXCLUSIVE. Nowhere is it given in the Shah Bano law that the muslim law CANNOT use another recourse and have to follow ONLY their own religious personal law. Also, CONSTITUTION being the king in law, Rajiv Gandhi's law violates the fundamental rights because ALL citizens are equal before the constitution and hence, one citizen CANNOT be deprived of his fundamental rights because he follows a particular religion. So, ultimately, if a muslim wants to remain within the purview of his personal laws, Rajiv Gandhi's law permits him BUT if he decides that his personal law is unfair, by the above two reasons, he can approach the courts. And anyway, it is hypocritical for muslims to claim Sharia law for civic issues but Constitutional law for criminal issues and then cry when Afzal Guru or Kasab are hanged after due process of law under Constitution. If they were under criminal Sharia law, a lot of taxpayer's money would have been saved. Also, hypocritical that temples pay gst AND INCOME TAX but Waqf board does not and the whole population has been subsidising the haj since independence, even though the religious rule is clear that a muslim has to do Haj atleast ONCE in his lifetime and that WITH HIS OWN EARNINGS. My lab technician is preparing to go for the 3rd time and he is only 48 years old. And he received subsidy the previous two times. AND SURPRISE, HE CLAIMS HE DOESN'T KNOW HIS TRIP IS SUBSIDISED. ALSO, HE CLAIMS MUSLIMS DON'T HAVE RESERVATIONS WHEN OUR STATE HAS THEM UNDER BC-E CATEGORY SINCE ATLEAST 15 YEARS. And he doesn't pay IT despite his father having been a government employee. You get what I am saying? One narrative in private for fellow muslims of the Quam and another narrative for the gullible worthless Kafirs. If that is not lying & cheating, then those who believe so are psychopaths.

Why is Shekhar Gupta twisting the facts about the alimony amount. Shahbano went to SC for the alimony amount of Rs 171.20 per month. Sekar made it Rs 500/month. It is unfathomable why he can’t lay the facts correctly.

Look at Shekhar weighing each word while speaking, unlike his free flowing opinions & criticisms when it comes to Hindu matters. 😂

JUst one religion ..

I remember the case but do not remember the quotes you now refer. We blamed the "kitchen cabinet" of Rajiv, like the one his mother was maintaining. Rajiv was scared to face the crowd and explain his views one on one.

Thank you SG sir.

The purpose of Iddat is to make sure that the woman is NOT already pregnant from the deceased or divorced husband.

Lord Shiva will come in any form. Satyam Shivam Sundaram.

When woman claim equality to men & the law gives them the same right, why is the onus of maintenance only on men. This is a discrimatory law biased against men.

@dev7155g

24 күн бұрын

Baat to sahi hai, phir husband ko bhi wife ka surname lagana chahiye shaadi ke baad, Bachho ke pichhe Mummy ka naam lagna chahiye in place of father's name and surname, husband should move in sasural after marriage, Ghar mai cooking bhi karni padegi 😅😅😅

@user-xz4sz9em9o

23 күн бұрын

@@dev7155g What weird logic. Take your feminism to family courts & see how men are being discriminated against. Bet you have no problem with that.

Welcome to the 21st century Abdool 😂

Guptaji,what about the abondant women's right to get maintance? This should be implimented in such cases also,if there is such provision,why Modiji is not paying maintenance to m/s Yasoda Ben?

Hats off Shekar ji for beautifullly summing up 40 years of history in under 20mins. What amused me was the comment of justice MH Beg that you quoted, and in contrast those of Najma Heptulla, a smart lady politician of her times, taking a conservative view. This makes me wonder what our most beloved Prez Abdul Kalam Sir must have thought about the infamous Shah Bano Law, then. Lastly, kudos to the SC for this landmark judgement, which is a harbinger of Uniform Civil Code (like they have in Turkey).

Please stop referring Ram Mohan Roy as hindu reformist. He was a christian missionary for the unitarian church