Thanks for this informative video.

@HiraArif2023

2 ай бұрын

Thanks a lot. Glad you liked it 😊

your content is different at the same time very informative keep up the great work mashAllah ♥️

@HiraArif2023

2 ай бұрын

Thanks a lot for appreciating my work ☺️

Im so impressed by your intellect and mashAllah your way of telling story is also very nice❤

@HiraArif2023

Ай бұрын

I really appreciate your kind words 😊 JazakAllah 😊

hi i want to know hira arif how you came in austriala make a video on it

@HiraArif2023

Ай бұрын

Thank you for asking. I will keep that in mind for future vlogs🙂

There was no love lost between the Turks and the Arabs; in fact, Turks looked down upon the Arabs like a lower race, and didn't think much of Mecca or Medina in the hundreds of years that Ottomans ruled that entire region. In fact, Mughals sent annual tribute worth a lot of Indian treasure to support Mecca, in the same misguided notion of some ummaiyat, I suppose. It's not wonder than Muslims aren't seen as loyal to the country but to their ummah, even if the rich among the Muslim nations mistreat the zealous converts of South Asia. Just see how Paxtanis are treated in Saudi, UAE, and Turkey itself! So if the British offered the Arabs independence from Turks, why wouldn't the Arabs, even Mecca's nominal leader, jump on that idea? And didn't the Arabs indeed gain independence from the Turks?-- What is Jordan, Syria, Iraq, and the entire Arabian peninsula if not independent Arab states?-- And most of them still have frosty relations with Turkey, and Turks return the favor. Only Qatar has friendly relations with Turkey right now, among the Arab states. And that has its own geopolitical reasons. I would think Pakistani Muslims would appreciate Israel/Zionism: both states were formed on the basis of the notion of two-state solution theory. It's interesting how Palestinians and Pakistanis have yet to accept Israel's right to exist, but Pakistani Muslims have zero problem with having carved out their own country out of a united India, on the basis that Muslims can't live under a democratic majority Hindu rule and in any case Muslims form a separate nation. And going back to the Holy Land: if anybody has the right to it, the Jews do. They've never left it, and have lived there all these thousands of years, literally thousands of years before the advent and existence of Islam itself! So it sounds to me like you prefer the notion of : "Heads, I win; Tails, you lose!" or "What's mine is mine, what's yours is also mine or can be negotiated". Besides, I don't understand why every Paxtani has to talk about Palestine, and that too, talk down to the Arabic ummah; what has "faujistan" done for this "cause"? Other than flashing the false Victim Card, it does nothing. I saw several of your other videos and think you are sensible and have a worldly, liberal mindset at least to some extent. I suppose on some topics, one can't expect Paxtanis to be truly independent of thought. You can take a Paxtani out of Paxtan, but not Paxtan mentality out of a Paxtani? hmm