How many CHIRAL CENTRES? Exam Strategy for Organic Chemistry

Check out my Playlists!
Year 1 = • OCR CHEMISTRY (Year 1)...
Year 2 = • OCR CHEMISTRY (Year 2)...
Check out this video on revision hacks = • Revision Hacks for Che...
What common organic chemistry mistake could you still be making? = • Organic Chemistry Exam...
My full catalog of content is linked below on a Google Sheet with everything in order of the specification for OCR A and by Module (using the tabs) :)
LINK: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/...

Пікірлер: 36

  • @mrmurraygreen
    @mrmurraygreen2 жыл бұрын

    Check out my tips for revising organic chemistry = kzread.info/dash/bejne/jKt8z82jpNiaf9I.html

  • @keiralopi4629
    @keiralopi4629Ай бұрын

    thank you!! you explained it so perfectly

  • @mrmurraygreen

    @mrmurraygreen

    Ай бұрын

    Glad it was helpful!

  • @ABHIRAMSRIMANMADASU
    @ABHIRAMSRIMANMADASU8 күн бұрын

    in school i was taught that the lone pairs also are contributing to the chiral centers, so the NH(secondary amine) has a lone pair with 3 different groups, so it is a chiral center, if this thin is true then tertiary amine also has a lone pair, in total having 4(in the video) + 2 = 6

  • @mrmurraygreen

    @mrmurraygreen

    7 күн бұрын

    Hi, an excellent question! Pyramidal nitrogens which are bonded to 3 different groups (whilst still having a lone pair), e.g. amines like you mentioned, are classed as achiral as they invert their own shape at RTP back and forth between their own isomers. Therefore we do not include them in the count. If we were able to create conditions where the inversion doesn’t happen then we would include them.

  • @natashahahahahha
    @natashahahahahha15 күн бұрын

    Total no. Of stereocentres in this?... 7?

  • @UJLMAO
    @UJLMAO2 ай бұрын

    So how many optical isomers would this have is it 16 or 8?

  • @UJLMAO

    @UJLMAO

    2 ай бұрын

    If so why

  • @mrmurraygreen

    @mrmurraygreen

    2 ай бұрын

    Hello - it would be 16. The rule is 2^n (‘2 to the power of n’) where n is the number of chiral centres. So here this would be 2 to the power of 4 which is 16.

  • @UJLMAO

    @UJLMAO

    2 ай бұрын

    @@mrmurraygreen I don’t really understand why though. If from each chircal carbon you can form two optical isomers wouldn’t it be 8 since 4*2 is 8. Id don’t really understand

  • @mrmurraygreen

    @mrmurraygreen

    2 ай бұрын

    @@UJLMAO There are 4 chiral centres and each one can either be R or S (like E or Z) so we need to consider all the possible combinations of this. e.g. RRRR, RRRS, RRSS, RSSS, SSSS, RRSR etc. There are 16 combinations.

  • @Iit1605
    @Iit16056 ай бұрын

    Why c doube bond ke saath wala n chiral ni h?

  • @mrmurraygreen

    @mrmurraygreen

    6 ай бұрын

    The carbon atom needs to be in 4 sigma (single) bonds

  • @laxyin2463

    @laxyin2463

    6 ай бұрын

    he meant why the nitrogen in the ring isnt chiral@@mrmurraygreen

  • @shresthroy3833

    @shresthroy3833

    5 ай бұрын

    Bhai pata chala bata do please

  • @nehapatel4865

    @nehapatel4865

    5 ай бұрын

    Chiral center only applied in sp3 hybridization

  • @laxyin2463

    @laxyin2463

    4 ай бұрын

    so the nitrogen isnt sp3 hybridised?@@nehapatel4865

  • @shresthroy3833
    @shresthroy38335 ай бұрын

    Can nitrogen be chiral center

  • @mrmurraygreen

    @mrmurraygreen

    5 ай бұрын

    Yes- so can phosphorous - check this out = kzread.info/dash/bejne/l2horKaKeZCWmrQ.htmlsi=zKelM9xyUPBVlr0g

  • @scottianrussell
    @scottianrussell2 жыл бұрын

    First

  • @BaMagraM666
    @BaMagraM6668 ай бұрын

    it is not called a chiral center, it is a chiral molecule and the center is stereogenic ;)

  • @mrmurraygreen

    @mrmurraygreen

    8 ай бұрын

    It is called a chiral center because I’m purely bring all of this up in the context of a carbon atom being bonded to 4 different atoms or groups within a molecule. Stereogenic centre has a broader definition. Thanks for watching.

  • @Stephen__tari

    @Stephen__tari

    12 сағат бұрын

    They're synonymous

Келесі