Can u please do a battle with kinjals and a carrier strike group

@grimreapers

Жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/i55ptsuOka2upZM.html

when will DCS hire CH?????

@jboydayz

Жыл бұрын

My thoughts exactly

@MattWaller04

Жыл бұрын

For real

@emanuelrivera7226

Жыл бұрын

I’m sure he’s on the payroll. 💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽

@user-mz5lr7zx4s

Жыл бұрын

It's stopped to be DCS . And become ChCS))

@waynesworldofsci-tech

Жыл бұрын

They bloody well should. CH does incredible work.

*Always* happy to see a CH reveal. Thanks for keeping us up to date. Wow! Has it really been a year?! SuperBaby is quickly moving toward Super______. Toddler? Boy? MiniCAP? I understand that each level of realism they add puts more stress on the CPU, but I would like to see the physics to prevent clipping, allowing all objects to interact with each other. What specifically brought this to mind was the fact that the B-52 wings would break off and clip through the body of the plane. Also, there was a piece/section that appeared to remain suspended in the air after the wind broke off, suggesting that you probably could damage something with the missing wing. Of course, there are all kinds of clipping issues on the ground as well.

@rubiconnn

Жыл бұрын

That would be so cool but I don't think it would be worth the effort. Games that tend to have very advanced physics like that also tend to be really buggy.

So you caught the s350 with it's PANTSIRs down. 😅

@BaseSerpentMessmer

Жыл бұрын

😄

just a quick sidenote, an S-350 battery has up to 8 TELARs.

@user-mz5lr7zx4s

Жыл бұрын

Maybe even 12 launchers for another information

I’ve been reading on the HAWK SAM and its many variants and many uses by the countries that adopted it. It would be cool to have some of those other variants of the HAWK, different from the one that is already in DCS. Especially interesting would be the most upgraded one and the Iranian version…

@rubiconnn

Жыл бұрын

I may be wrong but I'm pretty sure it's already in DCS?

@MaxIsStrange1

Жыл бұрын

@@rubiconnn Yes but it’s a rather old version and it would be really cool to have the newest one because it had so many improvements that it basically might as well be a new SAM system (for example, the fully modernized HAWK could even engage up to 12 targets at once thanks to the Low-Altitude Simultaneous Hawk Engagement system), and/or it would be great to see some of the interesting modifications introduced by (and specific to) some of the countries which used it. The different versions of the HAWK would mostly be great to have in Cold War era scenarios to introduce a little variety (i.e. you could give Iran their own version of the system, instead of the American one).

Very nice, Cap. Thanks to CH.

Very cool! Thanks CH and CAP of course :)

IT SHOOTS DOWN HELL FIRES TOO TESTED LASTNIGHT

@Davros-vi4qg

Жыл бұрын

Wtf!

@stupidburp

Жыл бұрын

Maybe try rocket spam

I bet the next version of those decoys will detect launch's & locks, calculate distance and MER, turn around, go defensive, wait for SAMs to fall from the sky in chase and then turn back in. That will drain SAMs even completely. You guys should try that with a swag of F16s. Work out when to turn and run, then when to turn back in, keep doing it until its out of missiles and take it out. Same deal for SRAD, draw the launch, turn and run, rinse and repeat.

Big kudos to Cap and CH. What an awesome duo!

These systems arw usually layer with the longer range wystems protected by these medium range ones. These are are then protected by short range systems.

Omg. That load out is hilarious! Made my morning Cap!

I was in the 40 FTS, great unit doing cool stuff.

Cap must know he sounds like the Alan Partridge of flight sims? Right? I can't be imaging this... PANG!

@andycrosby1242

Жыл бұрын

lol i always thought he sounded like anthony daniels

CH you are an amazing guy. Your work ethic is off the charts! Only your skills outshine your drive. Super Cap gets so much content from you.

About the B-52 bombers, your mention about the B-52 Arc Light rain during the Vietnam War against the SA-2s made me wonder if you guys could do an air raid combat scenario involving 1960s/1970s period (i.e. Vietnam War-era and Six Day War and Yom Kippur War era) aircraft and AA weapons? The scenario involves your team trying to defend a B-52 bomber raid against a target defended by the same period AA weapons. It's like a replay of the B-17 bomber and WW2 fighter escort vs. 1960s/1970s AA weapons (both SAMs and AA guns) scenario only this time, it'll involve B-52s replaying the Arc Light bombing raid and having 1960s/1970s fighter support.

Holy shit!! 1 already... wow that went by fast. Happy birthday Jr. Super Cap

Interesting idea - drop your landing gear, taxi up to the radar, and use your guns. Might work with a WW1 style string bag.

Buccaneer tactics are getting more relevant again. Maybe it stealth glide bombs. Also Cap have you seen the UK Jackel Drone?

@aztec0112

Жыл бұрын

I'm thinking tungsten rods from space are looking better all the time

@trolleriffic

Жыл бұрын

@@aztec0112 Rods from God is one of the worst ideas for a weapon ever. How is it better than having the same KE penetrator on a missile that can be produced in much smaller numbers for the same effect and can be concealed and protected from counter-attack? Orbital weapons have to be deployed in truly vast numbers (thousands if not tens of thousands) to keep response times short enough to be useful and they're easy to track and target because you can't hide space launches and orbital assets are trivially easy to spot, identify and track. The fact that no serious work has gone into implementing such a weapon is a good indication that it's not worth the effort.

@grimreapers

Жыл бұрын

Yeh I'm trying to get CH to make Jackal.

@totalnerd5674

Жыл бұрын

​@@aztec0112 Tungsten rods are cool and all, but because of the trajectory of the weapon it might be mistaken for a nuclear missile. Which, of course, leads to bad things.

the "yes" at 0:33

oh nice it is a russian sam with something other then "00" at the end.

nice @CH, cheers GR

Love it!

cool! I was satisfied

Nice Demo Cap, Seems like a Decoy(s) and Harms combination could be effective...

I don't even play DCS but I find what CurrentHill does to be absolutely incredible.

@altPastaTits

Жыл бұрын

for real this is genuinely unbelievable how realistic the vehicles are. the detail on everything…legit masterpiece artwork

0:23 is there a CH Su-57 project leak? Exciting!

@BaseSerpentMessmer

Жыл бұрын

Very exciting

@grimreapers

Жыл бұрын

Neg, just some adjustments to the normal one I needed help with.

Dude currenthill is a Modder with big M.... Very nice pack.... Bravo!

Happy birthday mini Super Cap 🎉❤

I love the cap solution to taking out the site.

@grimreapers

Жыл бұрын

They didn't see that coming!

The B-52's should be flying at 50,000 feet.

ADM160A has a unit price of around $30k and a range of like 300km (double the search radar range) so enough of those could be used to completely drain all of the interceptors then use glide bombs to destroy the site.

Where to find MALD mod? Didn’t see it on the CH site

Could we see a video trying a SEAD/DEAD mission against this with decoys launched just ahead of aircraft with harms, curious if that would manage it

@grimreapers

Жыл бұрын

Yup

Yes!

Happy B-Day to Mini Grim Reaper!

these integrated SAM systems are pretty fascinating. I now wonder how the chinese HQ-9, HQ-11, HQ-22, FK-3000, etc. perform in comparison. Please make it happen!

@altPastaTits

Жыл бұрын

what i want to know is if the stats given by china for their SAMs are anywhere near the reality, or if they’re another russia where they claim it can’t be beaten but once put in combat it’s a total embarrassment 🤷‍♂️ just like their ‘unstoppable’ PL-15s that have never been used in combat….i have a feeling they are **greatly** exaggerating what their own toys are capable of…..

@nemiw4429

Жыл бұрын

​@@altPastaTitsChina exported their SAM to Serbia. The export variant therefore we can be confiden is correct. Also Serbia needed good SAM. Thats the only thing that protects them from NATO democracy bombs.

@AmirShafeek

9 ай бұрын

​@@nemiw4429I believe that China will sell some to African countries as well. And some Middle Eastern countries. I'm intrigued to see that if America stop being in the world powerhouse, how China will treat third world countries. Will she bomb them and take their resources? Or will she be fair?

such a good museum

Good Dad, get 'em into planes early.

Zoom, Boom, Bap, Blap, Fizz, Bang. Awesome 😮😂😂😂

With the ADMs: can't you set up way-points for the aircraft and then deploy X amount of ADMs per way-point? That will allow a staggered launch?

@grimreapers

Жыл бұрын

real life YES in game NO

Maybe this was asked earlier; but where do you get the modes for the ADM-160 MALD Decoys & Storm Shadow Cruise Missile? Or is this something the Reapers made for themselves? Hoping to get the ADM-160 on the A10C since there is an actual program making this a reality.

@user-mz5lr7zx4s

Жыл бұрын

Storm Shadow have jas 39 plane. It is free mod. About ADM 160- in DCS I don't have information.

So finally breaking down and downloading DCS. Do you guys have a discord community?

@grimreapers

Жыл бұрын

Link in vid description.

Awesome! GR i have a question. Where is that big old good carrier battles? :( Can you run a Russian CSG vs UK CSG? With all the current assets. Please. :)

@Tuck-Shop

Жыл бұрын

Dry docks and tugs aren't in DCS so Russia cannot use their carrier

@sulyokpeter3941

Жыл бұрын

@@Tuck-Shop That was a good one. :D

@BaseSerpentMessmer

Жыл бұрын

​@@Tuck-Shop😂

@5Andysalive

Жыл бұрын

pretty sure he did all possible combinations already.

B21 Raider? I'm wondering how that would go

it doesnt shoot down prsm missiles for some reason

CH you are a bloody legend 🫶⛳

Love it! Next id like to see the MALDs go low, so that they get line of sight to the search radar at the same time as the SS’s. That way they don’t need to use up all the missiles, they can overwhelm the tracking system instead.

Do like a worldwar 3 whit all the nation that has modern weapons

I'm guessing the AI wasn't listening with the B1b because they were 1k ft off the ground instead of ~200?

@grimreapers

Жыл бұрын

I think that was above sea level height.

Cap, you damn well know the US doesn't sell the Raptor to anyone.

@grimreapers

Жыл бұрын

I wish they would.

wow

Jesus christ, that F-15 with a TALDS infestation is gonna give me nightmares!

Shees... Lol @ How much is 3 times 12? Forty..?? For the rest great video.

Tow Missiles are no longer Wired Guided, The current generation of TOW missiles are Optically guided and have a range of 4500 meter. The manufacturing corporation (Raytheon Missiles and Defense (Tucson, AZ)) wanted to keep the name TOW as a legacy but the "W" no longer means Wired Guided, instead Raytheon chose to name there missiles "Wireless." The legacy namesake was merely a way to implement an entirely new missile system under the guise of already congressionally approved funding. Despite the deceptive namesake, New TOWs are considerably more lethal than legacy and out of stock original wire guided counterparts.

@MaxIsStrange1

Жыл бұрын

Well, technically all TOW missiles are SACLOS guided and that hasn’t changed. The difference is that with the TOW-2B AERO version, the launcher no longer uses a copper wire to communicate with the missile, using radio signal instead. An interesting fact about the copper wire versions of the missile is that its range or even the ability to reach the target varied based on the type of terrain between the launcher and the target-if you tried to fire a TOW over a body of water, the range dropped significantly (however, firing TOWs over water was generally discouraged because copper wires without any isolation and water are not a great mix, if I remember correctly). Dense vegetation was also a problem because there was always a chance that the wires could get tangled and snap. So overall, the switch to RF not only increased the range, but it also made it much easier to fire the missile over a range of different types of terrain.

Who else heard the intro declaring it’s assassins’ day😅

why in the flat trains I know they use mountain for better hiding from anti radiation missile

@ChucksSEADnDEAD

2 ай бұрын

A mountain would also hide incoming aircraft, which would use toss bombing to hit the SAM site without exposing themselves.

It they locked on to things as low as that f16, wouldn't they shoot at trucks and windmills and trees and cows?

why do grim reapers/missles use nautical miles as a standard measurement?

@watcherzero5256

Жыл бұрын

Aviation generally uses nautical miles for distance/range and kilometres for speed rather than miles. I believe its because the first aircraft navigators were maritime navigators.

CH Please create the following-- Avenger Air Defense System, Starstreak THOR, Rheinmetal SKYNEX, Stryker IM-Shorad, THAAD, Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System NSM, Truck Mounted Modular SM-6, Strategic Long Range Cannon, General Atomics Blitzer Cannon, Stryker DE M-Shorad!!🙏👍

@Anarchy_420

Жыл бұрын

Plus-- AEGIS Ashore!🙏👍

@MaxIsStrange1

Жыл бұрын

I think that out of all of those systems, THAAD has the largest capability gap to fill in DCS because Russia has the S-400 and the US equivalent would be the Patriot and the THAAD working together and the system is incomplete without the latter. The second place would go to the Stryker IM-SHORAD which now can be fully modeled since ED has added the radar-guided version of the Hellfire missile, the AGM-114L. The only part missing would be the fully modernized Stinger (most likely the FIM-92K version with added DataLink). The huge benefit to adding the new Stinger would be that CH could then relatively easily modernize all other core game assets that use Stingers by just swapping the default missile for the new one and leaving the 3D model as is.

@Anarchy_420

Жыл бұрын

@@MaxIsStrange1 interesting info about the sim, thanks!✌️

@Anarchy_420

Жыл бұрын

@@MaxIsStrange1 lol no comment on DE M-Shorad? Cap was talking about direct energy weapons in the past a few times ;)

@Anarchy_420

Жыл бұрын

@@MaxIsStrange1 I personally really like the Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System! Basically a Unmanned Truck with NSM, pretty amazing! The Modular SM-6 is a game changer, especially if they can go with SM-6 Block 1B! Lol plus Hypersonic Blitzer Cannon and "Hypersonic Air Breathing Ammunition 1,000mile Super Cannon" aka SLRC should definitely not be overlooked!

I wonder how a helicopter attack would go. Also, why has no one developed retractable weapon pylons?

@billwhoever2830

Жыл бұрын

What makes you think that an attack helicopter has higher survivability than an f16 almost touching the ground? Ofc the helicopter will get shot down by the SAMs. And there is an even bigger threat for the helicopters: in case to reach the SAM site, they will have to fly over at least a few km of enemy teritory, being under manpad threat, AAA threat and close range SAM threat. An attack helicopter can even be shot down with a 50cal machinegun if it accidentaly flies over.

@solomongray6352

Жыл бұрын

@@billwhoever2830 I don't, I just like when they run helicopters.

@Utubesuperstar

Жыл бұрын

For helicopters? They have a long time ago look up the Comanche also they generally aren’t practical

Anyone see the video of the ruzzian pantsir trying to engage a loitering suicide drone and failing horribly?? Ruzzian AA is super overrated j/s

@Utubesuperstar

Жыл бұрын

I think it’s more so incompetent people

@mr.nemesis6442

Жыл бұрын

Probably due to poor training. The human is the greatest limitation of modern systems.

@leonleeoff2216

Жыл бұрын

Let me know when you find a competent ruzzian

@limedickandrew6016

Жыл бұрын

No, haven't seen that video. I have however seen the video from an Al Jazeera tv crew filming Ukrainian attempts to shoot down that rogue Bayrakter drone over Kiev about two months ago. It massively called into question the almost 100% shoot down rate Ukraine always claims whenever Russia send a mass drone/missile attack to Kiev.

@leonleeoff2216

Жыл бұрын

@Limedick Andrew have you seen the 36 Cessna sized drones that flew into Moscow without any resistance? Tbf they were really fast like 200kph 🤣

Would they be flying that low?

ANTI RADIATION MISSLES FROM THE JAS 39

Does it come modeled with all the corruption and incompetence so that 10+% of the missiles fail, the tires blow out, and half the time its randomly turned off?

@AmirShafeek

9 ай бұрын

Source

Why is CH not employed full time doing this?

New Sam Alley soon?

Wait. GR baby is 1 already??!

Will we see a Test with the IRIS-T system Ukraine is using atm the IRIS-T SLM 40km range

@MaxIsStrange1

Жыл бұрын

I believe they’ve done that already. The system is included in CH’s Swedish asset pack and a few GR videos featuring the IRIS-T SAM have been out for a while. Edit: Here are a few examples: kzread.info/dash/bejne/gKGbqbymqbPYabQ.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gGmOmpOih5u_frw.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/gG2Gm6mOhsa6qc4.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/m2R73MSamqyWnbg.html

@grimreapers

Жыл бұрын

^^ thanks

@iluminas2866

Жыл бұрын

@@MaxIsStrange1 I actually seen all of these and enjoyed them though i thought it would be intresting to see something similar with the SLM variant wich has double the range and bigger altitude also it would have a much better radar to go with it. This would make it much better against for example the Kinzhal with the better range as the last one was close as.... with the SLS

@MaxIsStrange1

Жыл бұрын

@@iluminas2866 Oh, OK. I misread “SLM” as “SLS”.

@iluminas2866

Жыл бұрын

@@MaxIsStrange1 All good 😊

Question for CH: Can his S-350 integrate with the modded S-400?

@user-mz5lr7zx4s

Жыл бұрын

It is simple thing if you a bit know how write and edit lua scripts. But 95 % of players want sit back and wait for someone to make their wishes come true. Bad strategy

Hahah so good, even good at friendly fire😂

Can you guys do Russia's Super Sonic missiles vs USA's Patriot System?

@MaxIsStrange1

Жыл бұрын

They’ve already done that. Just search “Grim Reapers Patriot” and you’re golden.

@Blue2swing

Жыл бұрын

@@MaxIsStrange1 Awesome, Thanks!

@MaxIsStrange1

Жыл бұрын

@@Blue2swing No problem 😁

I'm sure your 1yo son had a blast at the war museum 😂

F-35s maybe?

Waddya mean by Russian standards it's a modern system?

A very entertaining and chilling video. Chilling because of the implications of this system if it works as advertised IRL. If the Russians decide to add S-350s to their S-400 sites along with the Pantsirs and other systems like the Buks and the Tors, SEAD/DEAD missions will become a lot tougher for the Ukranians to do. Not impossible, just a lot tougher. And what is CH working on with the Felon? I still want to see a battle between them and the Block-70 Vipers.

The haters will still keep saying how s350 sucks.

why would south korea work with russia on a military system?

@azoriusmage

Жыл бұрын

Yeah if they had a war with the North who is going to help them? Russia?

@AmirShafeek

9 ай бұрын

Because they're their own And they need to do what's best for them. And stop handling to the Americans, and this is coming from an American.❤

Great, another completely invulnerable Russian SAM system. It's good looking though...

@MaxIsStrange1

Жыл бұрын

I have this feeling that following the publicly released specifications when modeling Russian systems in DCS might’ve led to ED and modders overmodeling their capabilities. I get that it’s hard to come by credible information about many of those systems and I don’t have an easy answer how to do “fix” it but I truly can’t escape the feeling that Russian systems get a buff just because their government likes to overstate their own capabilities.

@Anarchy_420

Жыл бұрын

Just look at their weapons systems performance in Ukraine ;)

@trolleriffic

Жыл бұрын

@@Anarchy_420 In the early days of the war both Russian and Ukrainian air defences struggled and underperformed a lot, but it's notable that the kind of easy kills of AA systems seen early on haven't happened for a long while. I think it's a combination of new software, more experienced crews and proper integration - this last one wasn't really possible at first for either side as the Russians were advancing in a pretty chaotic way and the Ukrainians had dispersed their defences to avoid Russian attacks. Once they both had time to set up properly integrated air defence grids, the air over Ukraine became very dangerous for both sides and there weren't any easy kills by TB-2 drones happening anymore.

@AmirShafeek

9 ай бұрын

​@@trollerifficAnd when the sad thing is, none of these guys get their news from credible sources, they get it from c n n and fox

What’s the point of NATO names?

@Davros-vi4qg

Жыл бұрын

Back in the day (Cold War Era) the Russian names of systems were often an unknown. So rather than give away which ones intelligence agencies had found out about, they all got NATO Reporting Names. (Yes some of us here are old 😂)

@stupidburp

Жыл бұрын

The Soviets had a policy of creating confusion by changing names and numbers to obfuscate true quantities and capabilities. NATO names kept things organized to make better intelligence estimates.

@jasonosmond6896

Жыл бұрын

NATO assigned codes and codenames to Warsaw Pact weapons as they were discovered. The codes were consistent between types of weapons systems, with the codenames being clearly distinct from each other so one would not be confused with another when spoken over a fuzzy analog voice link. Surface-to-air missile systems got designations that starting with "SA-1" and codenames that start with the letter "G", so for example the Soviet S-75 was the "SA-2 GUIDELINE", the S-200 was the "SA-5 GAMMON", etc. Some systems got multiple NATO designations (the S-300 family includes the "SA-10 GRUMBLE", "SA-12A/B GIANT/GLADIATOR", and "SA-20 GARGOYLE") because the variations have important distinctions in capabilities.

@shaocaholica

Жыл бұрын

Thanks everyone. So does NATO coordinate in naming their own kit so they can be easily differentiated?

considering it is based on a Korean system which have failed some tests before I doubt they are better than any other Russian systems

@stupidburp

Жыл бұрын

Korean test standard: does it work? Russian test standard: how much money can we steal before we make up results and get drunk?

@voidtempering8700

Жыл бұрын

​@@stupidburpConsidering Russia has some of the most potent IADS in the world, your assertion doesn't make much sense when applied to reality.

@mfreed40k

Жыл бұрын

​@VoidTempering which has been knocked out by a paper airplane with a pointy end and a firecracker glued to the end.

@voidtempering8700

Жыл бұрын

@@mfreed40k My argument would be which system has scored the longest surface to air kill.

@trolleriffic

Жыл бұрын

Pretty much every weapon system has test failures so by itself that doesn't say anything. Even something like Patriot turned out to have performed quite badly in combat during the Gulf War but the US kept using it and improving it.

CH, please, please, PLEEEEEEASE mod Gl-SDB to be launched by a Su-27 or MiG-29 -cuz weirder, less credible mashups have already been done in Ukraine. Supersonic Shoot and Scooooot!

Ma works fantastically in DCS. And a drone from Ukraine flies in and hits Moscow.

I'm 10 mins and I'm so confused. You spent 5 minutes talking about the texturing on the SAMs but zero seconds explaining the setup. Are you dropping bombs from those bombers or are the bombers themselves the target? Also, what exactly is the target on the Russian side? For newbie viewers (or for anyone really) a proper walkthrough of wtf we're actually watching would be very useful.

First

@edvin_hook

Жыл бұрын

yeah

New? This system is around for over a decade 😅

@trichi827

Жыл бұрын

It entered service in 2019.

@foshizzlfizzl

Жыл бұрын

​@@trichi827 entered service, doesn't mean in Russia it's new. It just mean the ministry of defense decided to buy those things from the company that produces it, ergo it gets a license for deployment. And if you ask Russians, the ministry of defense often has no clue as all ministries.

@AmirShafeek

9 ай бұрын

​@@foshizzlfizzlThat technically doesn't make it any less new.

What a boring lack of imagination. Where are the HARMs? Where are the launches from multiple directions? How about B-52's from 50,000 feet. B-2's from 200 feet From a different direction and HARMs coming in from a third direction at the same time.

@azoriusmage

Жыл бұрын

You know you can word something like that in a much more positive way

@stephenfowler4115

Жыл бұрын

@@azoriusmage yeah or you can just use a club

@azoriusmage

Жыл бұрын

@@stephenfowler4115 Sure or you could respect all the hard work Cap puts into this channel

@AmirShafeek

9 ай бұрын

​@@stephenfowler4115Stop complaining if you can't do better what you can't. Cause you don't know how to mod or code, then just be happy with what we have. You are entitled to anything

The one area where Russia is superior. SAM systems.

@jakecakestuff1443

2 ай бұрын

Tell that to the S400 site that got destroyed by a 80s era ATACMS missile from Ukraine 😂😂😂

@poseidon5003

2 ай бұрын

@@jakecakestuff1443 Would you PLEASE clue in.

thx - CH - AceEye60