Usually the drunk in the streetlight line is used to point out how stupid a strategy is, not to endorse it...

@LarrenceUmpersalt

2 ай бұрын

Yeah that confused me so much

@Dlweta57

2 ай бұрын

I thought that also

@andanssas

2 ай бұрын

This is applied dark strategy here, where things are not what you thought they were 😂

Because all of our really cool equations don't work without a 95% fudge factor.

@orcmanddegormak1031

2 ай бұрын

seriously.. dm isnt an object, its evidence the math is janked somewhere.

@JohnRandomness105

2 ай бұрын

They've found galaxies without dark matter, galaxies with more than usual dark matter, galaxies that have leached dark matter from neighboring galaxies. On a much larger scale, they've found attractors composed mostly of dark matter. Dark matter is real.

@orcmanddegormak1031

2 ай бұрын

@@JohnRandomness105 it isnt real. the misunderstanding of "our understanding of the math defining our universe as we observe it" is. thats why its dark, cause they're in the dark about how to solve that issue without starting over

@benjaminbeard3736

2 ай бұрын

​@@orcmanddegormak1031people like you said the same thing about neutrinos because they couldn't be seen.

@orcmanddegormak1031

2 ай бұрын

@@benjaminbeard3736 but they (neutrinos) were predicted. nobody predicted dark matter or energy, it was a phenomena observed in the math predicting the mass galaxies. and some idjits still dont know what yhe redshift is all about, cause thats the other issue. the predicting calculations are all wrong. all the crap theyve invented wity math to solve most of it is in a knot right now, an invented clever knot based on poor assumptions like 70 years ago.

Was "off again" on thinking there is Dark Mater, until I just saw Anton's report on an ultra faint, dark matter, dwarf galaxy (his video was also released today); I'm now "on again". 😊

I never hear anyone talking about the dilation of distance which increases and shortens distance. The distance is shorter in outer space away from matter and the distance is farther where there’s a lot of gravity. This affects the rate of causality together with the dilation of time as observed by us. Everything happens faster in outer space away from gravity and everything slows down near the mass of a galaxy. This is the absolute best explanation for the unusual motion of things, the farther away from the center of the galaxy it is.

The trouble is we keep finding out what we think we know, is wrong. If the universe is infinite, then so can the possibilities be.

I will believe it when I see it.

I think Space itself should be investigated as if it were a physical material, since it can be curved by a large Mass. There is more of it than anything else, so that could solve "missing Dark Matter" problems. The question is how do you detect the characteristics of something that may be more subtle/smaller than your measurement equipment? Has anything in Science ever been detected that was smaller than what the Detector could "directly" measure? If so, that method/approach might be useful in getting a better understanding of the nature of Space.

Thanks so much for this video 🙏

The Dark Universe requires a lot of money from the budget: an experiment that sheds new light on the Universe will help save costs. We can create an educational and practical device and practically master Einstein’s theories of relativity or obtain, for example, new physics: Postulate 1. Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta. Postulate 2. The gravitational field controls the frequency and speed of light in a vacuum. This is determined experimentally using a hybrid fiber optic gyroscope (based on Michelson's experiment 1881-2024). Using a hybrid fiber optic gyroscope, the straight-line speed of vehicles can be measured.

Great content. Very impressed. Please keep up the good work.

Please join my mailing list here 👉 briankeating.com/list ✉

Very simply explained, friend. I liked it.. Thanks for your efforts.

If you were a house painter you wouldn't be able to find 95% of the house, I'm guessing you'd expect to get paid for the entire house.

@jdirt2019

2 ай бұрын

House painter here.... we mostly get high.

Oh not even about sterile neutrinos? Can the known neutrinos slow down enough to accumulate such that the combined mass has significant gravitational effects?

When, what calendar date, was day one for the Standard Model?

It is an amazing thing to realize or think the same thing that annihilated and or divided a large bulk of the early universe may very well be at the center of stable particles. Says a lot about something so little.

Thank you for the video. I would like to know how are they going to take into account all the other lenses such as galaxies, stars and even planets. Because of the smallness of neutrino mass, their effect on the lensing is also very small which means that one should consider all lenses with at least the same magnitude. The problem is that we most certainly don't see all the stars (and others) which can effect the light, and even if we did, it is very very difficult computationally. Please correct me if I am wrong.

I would like a study on the correlation of total dark matter and total radio flouroscence from all the spiralling radio filaments between galactic arms. I also want to see the closeness to 75% dark energy explained by a mathematician capable of studying general relativity and the symmetry of space-time projections in 4D.

My bet is solidly on the neutrinos and anti-neutrinos, especially since galaxies' cold dark matter amount is generally on a decreasing trend across the billions of years, with most ancient galaxies tending to have the highest relative amount of cold dark matter bound to them, which makes sense since all stars of any galaxy emit hot neutrinos and hot anti-neutrinos annihilating some of this cold dark matter (slow neutrinos and slow anti-neutrinos) away as well as the slow anti-neutrinos annihilating away over time in galaxies by contact with gas and stars. And so over billions of years, galactic core-cusps (with its associated problem or mystery) assumed for the density distribution of cold dark matter in galaxies, particularly at their centers should be flattened out via annihilation of this cold dark matter.

Hello Brian, The problem is, physicist will not accept that the standard model is basically flawed and wrong. They say " You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink ". When someone offers water in the shape of an alternative model to physicists, they ought to drink some of it. Consider an alternative possibility. I would suggest that there is a misconception of what is being refered to as ' Dark Matter '. I believe that what is being refered to as ' Dark Matter ' is in fack ' Antimatter '. ' Antimatter ' I believe is Embryonic Hydrogen, and the first stage in ' Nucliosynthesis '. I would contend that everything that exists in the universe is composed of just two incredibly small Monopole Particles, either alone or in combination. That is it, it is that simple, all of the other so-called particles making up the standard model table of particles, are composites of these two particles, including the Electron. ' Dark Matter ' consists of a cloud of negatively charged Monopole particles that fill every available empty space that is not a nucleus throughout the universe. The negative force of repulsion that is produced by these particles trying to repel each other is the ' Dark Energy ', and one of the two forces of gravity. There has just been published, a book called ' The Two Monopole Particle Universe ' by Tony Norman Marsh on Amazon and Kindle, which gives a radical, yet Logical alternative to the standard model. This is well worth consideration, considering the standard model is plainly fundamentally flawed, and there is at this present time, no feasible alternative on offer. Kind regards, Tony Marsh.

Dark matter is an extreme micro size of blackhole. It is in a concept of compressed matter where in its structure contain only matter; There is no space in it. It is not a normal matter. And CMB is a trace of dark matter dynamics. I humbly thank you 🙏🙏.

matter is visible , if we know hot to, we can make invisible. just like the negative n positive side to everything it must have its minus side too. and since we cant pinpoint it, dark matter is an apt name.

Dr. Keating, do we have any post- Eddington observation of the sun deflecting light from stars at its limb. And even more importantly, at 2r, 3r and 4 r?

Why assume that lensing is caused by neutrinos when it could more likely be baryon and electron mass?

Over cosmic distances, could particulate and gas warp light?

How can gravitational lensing tell us whether the lens is made of neutrinos or the as yet undiscovered dark matter? FWIW if dark matter exists I think the lense is a composite of both and we can only measure the combined mass, or am I wrong?

1:20 Neutrinos as dark matter, and the joke about the drunk searching where the light is, reminded me of this: aliens visited the moon a little over half a century ago. I glanced at a few comments. This video has flushed out the science deniers. Maybe I haven't seen enough, but I've never seen advocates of MoND as alternative to dark matter mention galaxies without dark matter, galaxies with a surplus of dark matter, galaxies that have leached dark matter from neighboring galaxies.

Kala is my favorite Neutrino!

I like that you showed off you left me in the dirt back at the park

Please explain or direct me to the answer. We see the light from the big bang and we say it is 13-15 billion light years traveled. I am seeing those photons now, but what about a few seconds later, aren't those photons from big bang now past me? What am I seeing now that those photons have past when looking the CMB? Once I see it, isn't what is behind it now what i'm seeing? Am I even making sense?

@jackheinzel8803

Ай бұрын

This is a good question. The idea is that the Big Bang happened everywhere in space, including where we are sitting about 13.7 Gyr ago. The CMB is just those photons that left the surface of last scattering 13.7 Gyr ago, but also far enough away that after traveling for 13.7 Gyr at the speed of light, they are only now hitting our detectors. (The surface of last scattering is about 300,000 years after the Big Bang, when the Universe was cool enough to be transparent to photons). As time goes on, we see photons which have been traveling 13.7 Gyr plus 1 second, emitted from a slightly more distant surface of last scattering, then 13.7 Gyr plus 2 seconds, etc. Often we talk about these things like they happened at one stationary surface at one moment in time because the human timescales of years is negligible to these time scales. You’re right that once the photons pass your eyes, the next thing you see is “behind” the surface of last scattering, but since the Big Bang happened everywhere, the thing you see behind it is just more surface of last scattering.

Are neutrinos a part of dark mater? Is all dark mater neurinos?

What about Neil Turok proposed right handed neutrino as the dark matter we are missing?

Classic yet good, PUNY good LOL

Is it possible that the undetectable part of dark matter is the result of virtual particles popping in and out of existance and the after effect is a minute gravitational field left behind after the particle and anti particle recombine. The density of the virtual particles in the quantum field would determine the overall gravitational force throughout the universe.

How many black holes are there in the galaxy? Oh wait, there must not be too many because we have contrived neutrinos to explain the existence of gravity Because there's something out there that can't be seen.

New physics are needed

An alt cosmology suggested by Sternglass-Einstein papers 1950s finding a named meson in the lab from two-pairs of counter-rotating electron-positrons needed a creation myth, yet on its own can be a portion of darkmatter being neutral externally as a single pair. Fwiw 🍺

Dark matter is in our rooms and some pass thru our bodies. In not so distant future children will have toy film made of some matterial that can detect and visualise dark matter simmlar to a film that can detect and visualise electromagnetic fields.

📍4:53

Why not talk about how it was "discovered" by Vera Rubin? That would put some context for this problem.

Here's a question that I don't think has been fully discussed: What's the density of neutrinos in the universe? True, their masses are small, but given sufficient numbers they might explain the dark matter problem.

@erinm9445

2 ай бұрын

This question has 100% been addressed. Nutrinos have been thoroughly explored as the possible answer to dark matter, and they form only a small percentage of it.

@hungryformusik

2 ай бұрын

@@erinm9445 If that's true, and I'm sure it is, then what's the point of this video? 90 years after Zwicky we are still clueless, that's amazing.

Why wouldn't dark matter be black holes with nothing orbiting them, so they won't eat anything and we won't be able to see them?

We know the effects we see are real, but do we really know it is matter… i.e. actual particles?

Dark matter and energy rather appears to be transparent, unaccounted for, spacetime curvature? That can be either repulsive or attractive? Massless packets or areas of constant light speed acceleration curvature? Neutrinos are interesting in that they flee from collapsing supernova and their neutron star or black hole cores at near light speed, are the particle aftermaths of the near light speed gravitational collapse of matter? They act like charge vacated particle shells, or tiny accelerated spheroids, that had their electric charge and quark gluon plasma stuffing knocked out of them? Thus leaving these little spheroids of acceleration that have asymptoted right up near the speed of light that exists outside of time, but neutrinos can't quite shake time off to achieve massless boson status? Understand your take, would neutrinos accelerate slightly into a light year thick block of lead or gold and slightly decelerate after leaving said dense heavy metal? These dense objects might not just be transparent to neutrinos but slightly attractive or accelerative to them?

Sure, we know that one kind of dark matter exists. But we also know that it doesn't account for nearly all of the dark matter that "should" exist, meaning we still don't know what's going on with the rest of it. Just because nutrinos exist, that doesn't mean that the rest of dark matter is accounted for by particles. Some, all, or none of the rest may be other kinds of dark matter particles.

@douglaswilkinson5700

2 ай бұрын

Astrophysicists call dark matter an "observable effect for which a cause has not yet been found." The effects are easy to observe but we have no idea what is causing them.

We have NOT detected dark matter at all. Nope. That is incorrect. In fact dark matter is just one hypothesis that is proposed to explain how certain observations are inconsistent with current theories of gravity. There are other hypotheses and they don't require believing in something there is no other evidence for.

It'll never end after dark matter it'll be something else I just pray we don't kill ourselves with it.

Would be cool if we could use dark matter to travel to distance galaxy faster than light. It is common knowledge dark matter travels faster than the speed light that’s why EM cannot detect.

You said "Study what we know", and then talked about a load of stuff that doesn't actually exist such as particles.

Learn more about neutrinos. Helps narrow the remaining options

This is a straight forward admission science hasn't got a clue.

We have not seen the effects of dark matter on earth. We have seen it in deep space. But it’s definitely not confirmed or detected! It’s assumed, but seems just as likely to be a result of a deep lack of understanding of the universe’s physical laws

New force.

No heavens

nope..you measure the effect of something you dont see, to explain an effect you do not understand...your field is stagnant and truly needs to check most of his assumptions, as it seems we keep measurng stuff we do not understand...particle physics included btw...

I think dark matter is just a difference in space itself and that is why it is not detectable. Who can detect space?

Isn't dark matter what creates gravity itself ? I mean: the invisible force that creates the push against matter ?

@lewis7315

2 ай бұрын

Maybe not. Each galaxy could have been created by a white hole. Each white hole is now a black hole at the center of a space time vortex which creates gravity. Space time might be falling to the center of the Earth; then vomiting out into another universe. this act creating gravity. Yes It can make your brain hurt!

@aquariumlife2929

2 ай бұрын

@@lewis7315 well , what you stated is a bit too much to my personal understanding. Not saying you're wrong, just that perhaps i'm too stupid to understand. But in my limited knowledge i feel that dark matter could be a form of intelligence ( perhaps divine ) itself, like a invisible ( too complex for our understanding ) liquid, fluid , that bonds all the universe ( matter, from atoms to galaxies ) together, in a intelligent way/law that is 'clearly' spaced in another dimension but still interact with matter in our universe under a higher purpose, but then again i'm no scientist, is just what my heart tells me.

My problem isnt the unseen subjective properties or treating idealism +subjective +objective = sigma 6 as equally credible physical measures. Its more about why we dont reorientate when we know physicalized line of measure statistical anylitic horizon paradoxes occurs in all form and shape interpretations. Wherever this newly expanded space is between galaxies gravity manifolds to draw out a maze timeline through is awesome but enhances the problems in matter with public understanding on why some neighboring galaxies collapsed nebula 13 billion years ago while the other may only have collapsed a billion or less. Mixed in as non homogenous form and shape but of course ( isotropic and homogenous everywhere we look miss lead the public in word play ) Seeing young & old collapsed nebula mixed in & around doesnt fill picture taught of ( over time galaxies evolve getting younger impressions).. very shady tbh. Even this is difficult because of evolutionary form and shape physicalized pov that all our thought experments are trained for and have no choice but hear explanained thid way. As opposed to epochs of placement for minds eye , methods like 1st position located and identified, 2nd flow through and 3rd by. We have so many competing models of separation but none really are very pragmatic that help guide pupils in ways that match the evidence. Its as if direction and detail is changeable but no matter how weird and irrational it gets protection of the over view umbrella of evolution only cares to control 1st position physical pov . Its the same in biology and geology but atleast in geology the only have 1/3 of earths strats since the rest is missing or regurgitated

@lewis7315

2 ай бұрын

gobble-D-gook? :)> My problem is scientists assuming along an un-provable narrative. all too much "science" is based on a stack of shaky card assumptions.

Calling Sherlock Holmes…is the theory consistent and explanatorily complete? Or what remains must be true.

Is there a anti-dark matter.

@pinocleen

2 ай бұрын

Makes sense, some kind of Goth matter.

@norayrgalikyan9560

2 ай бұрын

There are anti-neutrinos for example. As for other forms of the dark matter, we don't know its composition so, probably, there are some models, where there is, and other models where there isn't. Also it is possible that there is no dark matter (in sense of some hidden mass), instead we got gravity equations not correct enough.

@pinocleen

2 ай бұрын

@@norayrgalikyan9560 Well said.

@shadowoffire4307

2 ай бұрын

@@norayrgalikyan9560 Neutrons are dark matter and if there are anti neutrinos. Isn't that literally a anti-dark matter? Or anti dark matter is real.

@norayrgalikyan9560

2 ай бұрын

@@shadowoffire4307 the point is that the question is not well formulated, because generally speaking there are different forms of dark matter.

You are fighting soo hard to hide the truth, but its futile - the genie is out of the lamp, its over!

Good video But to say we have dark matter does not take into account the mega structures that should not exist at all so to use dark matter to keep explaining the tension has to be wrong to start with. If your starting with the wrong rules then you will need to keep adding things to fix this tension, but this is now beyond a tension and it should be a break .. When you have people good enough to have predicted that these mega structures would exist and the sizes of them as well in published papers, we need to pivot these papers and theories have been ignored by the establishment because it conflicts with their theory that indeed have been accepted and have tenure and funding. IT`S TIME TO RESET :) We should be always looking how to test a current theory or break them these points of tension are where to look and this galaxy could be a prime candidate for that if this is as old as thought, the reason it is still together my not be because of dark energy but more to do with the original theory being wrong, the big bang may not have happened or not in the form we think and therefore the expansion is not uniform and or a factor that you can rely on for the current model to function. Just adding in things to make it work i consider is not great science, we need to go back to the fundamental things we know for fact and look at things that will be more elegant and less convoluted or i fear that we will send another 20 years getting more and more complicated and we still don't have a model that works. JWST and UCLID should give us enough data by the end of 2024 to at least put a pause to the current standard model. The best minds should gather and study these tension / break points that should not exist and work from that point out. List out what we are facts and can be confirmed / agreed by the group and use each others points of view to expand their current ideas and make the breakthrough needed.

I thought I was going to see something new here. But, no.

Dark matter... it's right there beside the Easter bunny, Santa Claus, and the Covid Vaccination.

@JohnRandomness105

2 ай бұрын

Excuse me?

Just a WAG, but I suspect that the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy will be solved only when we better understand the nature and origin of gravity. Is it fundamental or emergent, etc.? In other words, I'm betting that we understand a lot less than we believe we do. Our reality can't be as absurd and pointless as it appears to be. Well, I'm hoping that's the case.

@douglaswilkinson5700

2 ай бұрын

Mass curves spacetime. This curvature is an acceleration. On Earth this acceleration is 32 feet per second per second. We experience this as gravity. Gravity is not a force: Force = Mass x Acceleration + (a relativistic parameter.)

Lol dark matter is a plug in for the incorrect gravitationaly based cosmological model. It's an electric universe .

No dark mater hasn't been detected, how could it ? Because it does not exist . the electric/plasma universe tells us why and explains the observation of ' its' action... Thunderbolts project yt channel.,

There is no dark matter

You don’t

Sadly physics is getting to nonsense territory,especially particle physics. Luckily some of the physicist realised these nonsensical things and started to gonl against modern ideas. Phsyics should be simple.

You got the drunk analogy straight from Eric Lerners video...... why copy him? And why make up claims of "we have detected dark matter".... no you haven't, and you never will because it's only been invented to make incorrect theories fit the actual observations

@Bill..N

2 ай бұрын

Friend, I remember long ago when I was a kid reading a simple version of THAT joke on the wrapper of bazooka bubble gum.. There have been hundreds of characters portrayed as the idiot and the innocent helper.. I therefore can assure you Lerners (?) Version is derivative as well..

@aaronmarchand999

2 ай бұрын

@@Bill..N lerners was a recent video on physics using it in a similar context to show how scientists are blindly and vainly trying to find truth in the big bang theory... this guy obviously saw his video and took the idea from him

@Bill..N

2 ай бұрын

@aaronmarchand999 Honestly, I can't say if that is true or not, but if we are talking about the same things, that precise joke with the lamplight and all is quite old..Yes? The man prefaced the joke by acknowledging it as an old joke, inferring it was not his.. Setting that aside, friend, I am unable to understand. Are you suggesting that the following part relating to dark matter was an exact duplicate or just structured the same? Peace.

@aaronmarchand999

2 ай бұрын

@@Bill..N Well... my comment wasn't meant for you, it was for Brian Keating who will know exactly what I'm talking about (if he reads his own comments). By the way Brian, you should have Eric Lerner on as a guest for discussion/debate

Hahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahaha

Nah. Fail. There's no proof of "dark matter, which was nothing more than a sophomoric speculation based on gross misinterpretation of observed phenomena.

Why don't you stay with the political stuff or climate and woke you tube and leave Physics to professionals?

Hello Brian Thank you so much for your kind reply asking me to contact you on Telegram. I have replied, but I am not sure whether or not it will go through as I have never used Telegram. I left my email address on that reply. I would put it on this reply, but in the past I have found that comments get removed if email addresses are put on them. I am happy to send a copy of my manuscript for your perusal in an attachment to an email Kind regards, Tony Marsh.

You don’t