Nice video! LONG LIVE SERBIA! ❤💙🤍

dude this is absolutely mindblowing. I feel like i am watching a professional documentary. You deserve way more subscribers. Amazing way to start the year!

@kurjakhistory4727

Жыл бұрын

Thanks a lot! Really looking to grow my audience so sharing this with anyone who you think would be interested would be awesome! Also let me know what you'd like to see me make in the future!

@micahistory

Жыл бұрын

@@kurjakhistory4727 i would say just continue this serbian history, i am learning so much

@flabby2142

Жыл бұрын

@@kurjakhistory4727 Add more Croatian History

@markian_vegan_washinginton9541

9 ай бұрын

@@kurjakhistory4727serbian empire

Your channel deserves three zeroes added to its subscriber count to 378,000. Excellent work.

The quality is insane. Please keep up the good work!! Love from Serbia 🇷🇸

Good work i love this.

Love you’re channel man, greetings from Ohio.

@kurjakhistory4727

Жыл бұрын

Love you too CJ!

This channel is awesome, great work

Great work we need more creators of Serbian and South Slavic history documentaries, you are doing great, just a small suggestion make background of the maps a little bit brighter, because it is hard to see if you use only dark colors. Свака ти част не могу ни да замислим колико ти је времена требало за све ово, само настави, чиниш јако значајну ствар на приближавању наше историје странцима. Види ако можеш да урадиш једну епизоду о Чаславу Клонимировићу или о Властимировићима у опште и њиховој борби за престо. Такође само једна замерка на историјску тачност Завидиног порекла, иако немамо наведен тачан извор његовог порекла у свим историјским изворима у књизи Мавра Орбинија Краљевство Словена из 16. века имаш податак да је он четврти син Уроша I Вукановића, а у ранијим изворима да је Вукановићима Завида рођак, али у сваком случају имаш континуитет владарске породице Властимировић од првог архонта или како га Мавро Орбини и Поп Дукљанин називају Свевлад до Бранковића и Јакшића у Деспотовини, те није Завида племић незнатног порекла сигурно, јер након прве пропасти државе након Чаславове смрти на Сави, Ромеји заузимају овај простор и уводе на кратко тематски систем и грчку управу са грчким стратезима до Јована Владимира и Стефана Војислава. Консултуј се слободно са овим изворима, јер их модерна истријографија не одбацује, већ су само скрајнути као да историја почиње од Немањића само нагласи да причаш о информацијама које си прикупио из тих извора. Само настави и истрај у овом предивном стваралаштву и све више нас ће доћи да гледа и да запрати твој канал, јер вапимо за нашом историјом у овом формату.

@troydodson9641

Жыл бұрын

Zssol here speaks truth. Content is good, the people and history you research are interesting. There are far to few videos on them.

Great video, thank you! Will there be more?

Odlican video

Thanks for this wonderful documentary! Can you please give me your sources for Serbia in the 12th century? I need them for a High School project.

hello sir, will there be more videos about slavs?

Vlastimirović dinasty was first donasty of Serbia. They rulled from 8 to 10 century. Why Stefan Nemanja was recognized as first Serbian ruller, and founder of Serbian medieval state?

@milos582

Жыл бұрын

They (Nemanjići) are not recognized as first but most important Because of Serbian-Orthodox heritage. The others are probably perceived as less impactful on the cultural and spiritual development of Serbia. Kind of BS since Vlastimirović, Vojislavljević where absolut a pain for Byzantium, Bulgaria and Hungary even beating them in wars.

@aleksandar9234

Жыл бұрын

@@milos582 Ne lupaj. Svi Nemanju smatraju osnivacem drzave prve. Cak i predsednik te iste drzave. Pitam se da li deca u skoli uopste uce o vlastimirovićima.

@aleksandar9234

Жыл бұрын

@@milos582 cak evo i stranci kao autor ovog klipa isto navodi Nemanju kao osnivaca prve srpske srednjovekovne drzave. Ne znam, nisam bio kod tog spomenika, ne bi me čudilo da tako i tu piše.

@user-js8rw9gt6l

Жыл бұрын

@@aleksandar9234 O bože. Godinama predajem istoriju u školama, čitam izvore ne parafrazirano nego direktno. Bukvalno biraj izdavačku kuću u svakoj ali svakom udžbeniku imaš Vlastimiroviće kao prvu srpsku dinastiju, čak je i u Jugoslaviji bilo tako. Nađi "istoriju naroda Jugoslavije" ako te interesuje i čitaj šta piše, e sad što su mnogi profesori preskakali te lekcije i brzali to je drugo. Ako ne želiš ili ne voliš istoričare, čitaj povjesničare gde čak se i oni ne libe da istaknu da su pojedini Vlastimirovići tražili utočište u tipa Hrvatskoj. Postojanje te dinastije je nesumnjivo kako god okreneš. Nemanjići su u svoje vreme zbog dinastičkog kulta sebe pretvorili u "osnivače" u neku ruku i jesu to bili, ali na brisan prostor nisu došli nego su imali veza sa pređašnjim dinastijama. Vlastimirovići se bukvalno navode kao takvi u Porfirogenitovom spisu o narodima (segment njegovog dela "O upravljanju Carstvom) koji ovaj jutjuber nije imao problem da iskoristi za svoj video o hrvatskoj istoriji ali eto slučajno je zaboravio ovde da pomene i jedan jedini deo kada se tiče Srba iako su u tom delu segmenti jedan do drugog. To delo je ključni izvor za najraniju istoriju ovdašnjih naroda i sva literatura ih koristi. Zaista se nadam da nije tako ali osećam zlu nameru vođenu sitničavim nacionalizmom i nadam se da će mi odgovoriti i da je u pitanju nekakva zabuna i korišćenje ograničenih podataka. Pošto ti je bitno šta stranci pišu čitaj E.Fine "Early medieval balkans" ili bar englesku vikipediju i kucaj Vlastimirovići i onda skrolaj dole i gledaj izvore, a mogao bi i pročitati samog Konstantina Porfirogenita jer bi trebalo da postoji na wikisource. Danas je sve to lako dostupno i osim ljudima opterećenim nacionalizmom ne vidim šta ima sporno u tom spisu posebno što je u isto vreme glavni izvor za najraniju istoriju i Hrvata. A to što Vlastimirovići nisu cenjeni i prisutni u javnoj svesti u Srbiji je stvarno sramotno i govori o stepenu neznanja i neinteresovanja za sopstvenu prošlost. Čak ni Crkva nije mnogo marila za dinastije pre Nemanjića, a i samom Nemanji je tek skoro podignut spomenik. Ekvivalent toga što je ovaj jutjuber uradio je kao da sad neki Srbin uzme da napravi jutjub video o Hrvatskoj istoriji i pravi se objektivan, profesionalan i neutralan a napravi video gde im izbriše onda svu istoriju pre 12 veka i kaže da se jednostavno javljaju kao ugarski podanici. Što ne želiš da rade tebi ne trebaš raditi drugima.

@bojanpavlovic5489

10 ай бұрын

zato sto ih priznao Papa i zato su bili clanovi Reda Zmaja i pristali da nam se unisti i prepravi sva Srpska istorija pre njih. Eto zato.

Once upon a time, only great rulers could have the name Nemanja, if I'm not mistaken. But in the end, my name is also Nemanja 😁

Can you do bosnia next?

Medieval Serbia and Croatia. I find so little on it as they often appear as side bits in the history of the larger powers around them, be it ERE, Cumans, Ottomans, Bulgaria. Watched your videos, thank you for giving some love to these little known to me peoples.

@DD-lt1rd

Жыл бұрын

Medieval Croatia never existed

@troydodson9641

Жыл бұрын

@@DD-lt1rd Neither did Turkey, but got to call the area something

@Akcija1930

9 ай бұрын

Although medieval Serbia was at one point supreme power in Balkans, during Emperor Dušan the Mighty. But his Empire collapsed soon after his early death unfortunately. One more important fact was that when Serbs arrived in Balkans, we didn't form one unitary state like Bulgarians or Hungarians but several small principalities (Raška, Bosnia, Duklja, Pagania, etc.) so that also played big role.

@troydodson9641

9 ай бұрын

@Akcija1930 I've done more research into it since, it's glorious and deserves some love. Of course, Tsardoms helped me

@pecapeconi234

7 ай бұрын

croatia didnt exist. the Avars or Havarats ruled those slavic lands, croats are mix of serbs/slavs and Havarats, nomadic people

As you've noticed it's Serbs that agree with you, nobody else.

nicely done, however there were more rulers of Serbian tribes before Nemanja. cheers.

@SteveRadich1928

11 ай бұрын

Coward's and criminals. Thats all your known for everything else is pure serb propaganda and lies. Lies are something serbs have been well known for throughout history.

@Touchedbynature304

Ай бұрын

47 rulers before yhem

Do Bosnia next! 🙏🇧🇦

@flabby2142

Жыл бұрын

not real

@realsaxual2357

10 ай бұрын

Already covered, Bosnia is Serbia

@rawka_7929

8 ай бұрын

​@@realsaxual2357Even if you'd argue that Bosnia was once Serbia, Much like North Macedonia used to once be Bulgarian. It isn't anymore, plus it had its own medieval state which would be interesting to cover.

The Serbian state was founded in the early 600s upon arrival to Southeastern Europe and was originally a Principality traditionally governed by the Vlastimirovic dynasty.

@josiprakovac3284

6 ай бұрын

@numenoreaneternity6682 Where are the graves of Serbian rulers (kings?😂 ) from the 600s to 12th century? Are there any graves of these phantom Vlastimirovics dynasties?

@dules65

6 ай бұрын

Incorrect, the Serbs did not arrive in the Balkans for 600 years, they were already there. There were probably immigrations, but on a smaller scale.

@Touchedbynature304

Ай бұрын

​@@dules65true, we are only 28% slavic , the rest is old I2a din

❤

The history of our rulers does not begin with Vukan and Nemanja.

@kurjakhistory4727

6 ай бұрын

Absolutely! Check out some of my other videos that go into south slavic rulers from before this period.

imagine gots on slavic we all know whats is happend but no one to doc on tv ,why not?

:) Do please extend your research to various literature, you could paint a more accurate picture of a interesting and important period of history. Maps are misleading and show extent of authority that did not happen, or in some cases is just wrong. No hard feelings, I compliment the quality of video but have issue with accuracy of presented facts.

@JohnnyWalker1077

Жыл бұрын

What do you think is wrong in this video?

@tomislavpusic6216

Жыл бұрын

@@JohnnyWalker1077 I wrote that maps are misleading. More precise they fail to adress difference between territory held directly by ruler, territory held by his suboridinate rulers, territory that nominaly acknowledge the rule of that ruler and territories for which we have no accurate knowledge to whom its inhabitants pledged its allegiance. Fact is that Stefan Nemanja had no rule west of river Cetina or over island of Vis. That is somethong that is obviously wrong. Showing everything in one colour is simplistic and often leads to maximalistic approach that doesn't serve historical accuracy.

Nemanjic dynasty had many rulers, but for me the best Nemanjic was king Dusan or as we Serbs call him (Dusan Silni)🙂

@CroatianUltraNationalist

Ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@Night-Monkey02

Ай бұрын

@@CroatianUltraNationalist Šta je toliko smešno Purgeru 😀

NIMANi Clan and Family exists, still, on Albanian Lands They remain still Albanians. Strange story, doesnt it ...

Im Ottoman Turkish and proud of giving The serbs and Kroatia, Bulgaria, Greece civilization and culture back in to lightness from the Dark Ages Darkness and Barbaric ways.

@LukeVincent-xt4dz

2 ай бұрын

You guys were people who only had some sheep but could ride horses and enslave others you enslaved gypsies from Persia and used them, as meat shields, then you unfortunately became an issue for us all you become strong because of the Catholics who attacked Constantinople anyway you took our Constantinople but Turkey now is not a major player.

I have one question?how is possible that Croatian propaganda is so strong ,that you have on this video maps with name Croatian and they didn’t existing before 19 century except like some small group who was fighting for money in 13 and 14 century.

@josiprakovac3284

6 ай бұрын

@user-BorisJanjic1389 To, Borise legendo, pa ti bi zajebo i Jacquesa Le Goffa!

@DaliborPerkovic-sw8mh

5 ай бұрын

This is not a truth! The Middle age Croatian Kingdom is older than Serbian Kingdom. It is not Croatian propaganda! It is a historical fact!

@Touchedbynature304

Ай бұрын

​​@@DaliborPerkovic-sw8mhyou never had any kingdom, ever.. You started to exist from 1941. NDH

all lies. Also ban Kulin was Croatian 1 Ban is a title only croats have 2 his father is a slavonian(croatian) noble

@Touchedbynature304

Ай бұрын

Ban is a slavic title

@JohnnyWalker1077

Ай бұрын

@@Touchedbynature304 Ban is a hungarian title that got adopted by bosnia and croatia-slavonia. Croatia got annexed by hungary and 1102 therefore it took over the title.

@CroatianUltraNationalist

Ай бұрын

@@Touchedbynature304 ban is a croatian title period.

@CroatianUltraNationalist

Ай бұрын

@@JohnnyWalker1077 absolutely not. Ban is a title used by croatian governors in the kingdom of croatia to rule over 3 counties, after the Trpimirović dynasty died out the current ban of the country was crowned as king. after he died hungary went in a personal union with croatia, with the ban of croatia remaining as a local ruler to govern the state. later that title was taken from croats by the hungarians and was given to newly created bosnian banate. so no Ban was most certainly not a hungarian title.

@JohnnyWalker1077

Ай бұрын

@@CroatianUltraNationalist Ah yes, the famous trpimirovic dynasty. Where are their graves, royal regalia, coins, monasteries, documents....anything left? The main source for croatian history is the mythical chronicle of the Priest of Duklja that has been written somewhere in the 1200´s, wich copy has been written in the 17th century by Orbini, describing events of early slavic history wich do not match with contemporary sources from 800-1100. Funny, isn´t it?

🎉🎉🎉🎉

Dude do it louder !! nobody can hear you