Go to nordvpn.com/covert and use code COVERT to get a 2-year plan plus 4 additional months with a huge discount in their special new deal! It’s risk free with Nord’s 30 days money-back guarantee!

@bathhatingcat8626

2 жыл бұрын

How does china deceive the location of a landing in Taiwan or even an attack somewhere else? This is dumb

@pieter-bashoogsteen2283

2 жыл бұрын

Are you also going to make a video detailing how the us could win a war with China? Seems quite fair that way. Otherwise you wouldn’t be objective, but just one sided.

@lamrof

2 жыл бұрын

This is a wishy-washy analysis. Thumbs down.

@charlesbrightman4237

2 жыл бұрын

ONLY those species who get off of this Earth and out of this solar system/galaxy might continue to survive, (if it can even actually be accomplished for various reasons), everybody else is eventually going to die and go extinct. We do not have to defeat our enemies, we only have to outlast them beyond this Earth. Nature will wipe them out for us.

@charlesbrightman4237

2 жыл бұрын

3 basic ways out of this galaxy to potentially continue to survive, (as a species or whatever evolves from our species): 1. Long way: Outward through the galactic plane. 2. Medium way: Outward through the angled solar system's plane. 3. Short way: Outward, about 90 degrees from the galactic plane, as adjusted for the galactic magnetic lines of flux for a smoother ride. (Basically 'rise above' the collapsing spiral shaped galaxy). * And music, don't forget music. It's going to be a long trip.

I know how they can win: they keep doing what they’re doing and we keep doing what we’re doing.

@eugene7145

2 жыл бұрын

You are wrong, as a person living in Hong Kong, I can tell you China is killing itself at an astonishing speed.

@outatime626

2 жыл бұрын

I can also say the weapons disparity is swinging more in US favor. China challenged us at what we do best and they tipped their hand too early. Prepare for doom.

@randomuser5443

2 жыл бұрын

@Heinrich Rising on sand

@guycross493

2 жыл бұрын

Both would collapse soon after if they wage war anyways. There's no real benefit in war in this day and age. On one side is a corporate dystopia, the other is a communist dictatorship. The unaffiliated would be eating popcorn as long as both won't end up throwing nukes at each other.

@yueqi7499

2 жыл бұрын

@@eugene7145 nah china is fine. Hk is fucked tho, with Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou and all the other port, your lazy ass just can't compete

do i still need NordVPN in a nuclear winter??!

@gustavocarmo2500

2 жыл бұрын

Yes

@Veldtian1

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, more then ever, it's crucial. No more questions.

@gustavocarmo2500

2 жыл бұрын

@@Veldtian1 Very well placed answer, if the ad says, it's because it's true.

@Deimnos

2 жыл бұрын

Depends if the roving bands of canibals can track you over the internet or not

@stevejones1488

2 жыл бұрын

That is still only a theory at this point,

One thing I d say would weigh in the US military favor is the fact that it has a lot of real life battle experience. This experience is hard to simulate.

@michaelngan99

2 жыл бұрын

"One thing I d say would weigh in the US military favor is the fact that it has a lot of real life battle experience [of losing wars one after another since WWII -- Korean War, Vietnam War, Iraqi War, Afghan War, . . .] This experience is hard to simulate." Fixed it forya. You are very welcome.

@herp-a-derp5234

2 жыл бұрын

@@michaelngan99 either way, you learn more from failure then you learn from success

@TehDawg

2 жыл бұрын

Accompanied by the U.K, a tiny land that has never surrendered, and no one has had the balls to invade in modern times.

@danielhunter6059

2 жыл бұрын

@@michaelngan99 Lmaoo Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan were political losses not combat losses America outclassed the other side in combat but the American public lost faith in the operations to go along with no clear operational objectives that could be sold to them, Korea is a stalemate and is a story of two tales before Chinese intervention and after even after Chinese intervention look how many Chinese died compared to Americans, before Chinese intervention America was winning the fight, North Korea couldn’t penetrate the 38th parallel line lost Inchon, Seoul fell next and then America penetrated deep into their territory. Americans can fight and are good at it, the key is the American public, and clear objectives and clear, factual reasons for doing so

@danielhunter6059

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-ex7qx4pv2u You didn’t understand at all American public opinion only matters when it comes to the political objectives as far as military objectives we’ll be fine. The important factor is time. America will need to be swift and quick in defense of Taiwan it can’t be more than five years. At the end of the day the government will protect its assets and Taiwan is very important for the US if the public knows that and isn’t ignorant to that fact then all is good

It is great to have this confrontation concept to learn how to defend better

Earth: *is destroyed Aliens: Ha, those guys probably didn't use nordvpn.

@ashleychristine8772

2 жыл бұрын

Lol there just waiting us out

@anshulbhardwaj4038

2 жыл бұрын

Your dogo is cute

@BrushEm

2 жыл бұрын

That’s why I love it

@willwozniak2826

2 жыл бұрын

Aliens: Still trying to reverse our Tech since we goofed and crashed==US Airforce.

Japan is playing an increasingly large role in the defense of Taiwan. And as Japan continues to militarized… thats only going to become a bigger thorn in China’s side.

@pierrecao4758

2 жыл бұрын

and yes, just a thorn that takes about 5 secs to remove.

@usecriticalthinking243

2 жыл бұрын

@Bobo Mbutu look at this lying leftist

@shinchan-F-urmom

2 жыл бұрын

South Korea and North Korea don't approve Japan's re militarise, so they, both Korea's, are China's allies.

@cbrtdgh4210

2 жыл бұрын

@@shinchan-F-urmom south Korea a Chinese ally? Hah! China is the biggest reason why NK exists in the first place. You're forgetting the tens of thousands of US troops and hardware sitting on SK soil/

@shinchan-F-urmom

2 жыл бұрын

@@cbrtdgh4210 still Japan is SK's biggest enemy, not NK. Also the only issue which unites SK and NK is Japan and comfort women

You mistook one thing. China’s objective is never to reach out to US continent and attack there. It just wants to keep Taiwan and defend any US/Japanese military from going in. That would be a relatively smaller mission.

@kerbodynamicx472

2 жыл бұрын

It’s a pain in the ass to have non-friendly carrier strike groups wandering near your borders isn’t it?

@padtag1742

2 жыл бұрын

@@kerbodynamicx472 why is that, cn never needed to go around the world doing slave trade/ bombing other nations with depleted uranium warheads/ chemical attack 3-4 generations using the orange bomb/ occupy all the oil production regions. So why the need to have allies wandering around the world? Cn always BUYS goods from others with real cash, not like you lot, robbing/invading/killing is in your blood.

@libertyprime8964

2 жыл бұрын

+15 social credits from winnie da poo

@padtag1742

2 жыл бұрын

@@libertyprime8964 when your little brain couldn’t reason, you had to be a bit throw out that credit thing. Pathetic.

@tedmoss

2 жыл бұрын

@@padtag1742 NO answer needed here, just go on, can't talk to demented person.

Same as black hawk down the enemy knew the US doctrine and use it to his own advantage it was quite a success

Clearly you need to launch drones from shipping containers to take your enemy by surprise ;)

@fegenein862

2 жыл бұрын

this comment is sponsored by Erusea

@sawoodahmad2970

2 жыл бұрын

Haha ace combat references loved it

@SiD19884

2 жыл бұрын

i understood that reference

@moochoopr9551

2 жыл бұрын

@@fegenein862 "Yup, we have nothing to do with it." - Unidentifiable Northeastern Osean.

@dgafbrapman688

2 жыл бұрын

check out the club-k shipping container missile system

‘The greatest victory is that which requires no battle’ - Sun Tzu

@kerbodynamicx472

2 жыл бұрын

So… trade wars, spying and sabotage?

@J_X999

2 жыл бұрын

Covid

@Hotsauce1936

2 жыл бұрын

Nowadays they got bomb drop from the sky so sun tzu shit not working😂😂

@kerbodynamicx472

2 жыл бұрын

@@Hotsauce1936 It can still work, you can fire some cruise missiles at them from the sea level, and then fire some ballistic missiles which brings death from above. While the enemies are busy intercepting the cruise missiles, the ballistic ones goes in for the kill

@shirleyxia9988

2 жыл бұрын

@@J_X999 between china and the us, who has used biological weapons the most...hmmmm

I always loved the red vs blue background music/intro music

Very well done and thank you.

War is not about winning it's about making the other side losing more than it can afford until they give up

@critical_shot9292

2 жыл бұрын

But is it that winning?

@derek8564

2 жыл бұрын

@@critical_shot9292 well if the other team gives up yes...yes it is

@TheMattsem

2 жыл бұрын

@@critical_shot9292 it's like your car on fire but the guy you hate his house on fire you still lost but he lost more so technically you win

@ephraimemmanuelchibuzor7459

2 жыл бұрын

That system is called “winning”

@crispywhites3343

2 жыл бұрын

If China loses, their last resort will be a nuclear Holocaust

I don't think China would directly attack US forces if they wanted to take Taiwan. I believe the more likely scenario would be China declaring Taiwan part of their territory and simply impose a soft blockade around the Island. They would then intercept any ship suspected of carrying military equipment. The US would then have to decide if they want to escalate and use force to restore free access to Taiwan. In that scenario the US would be forced to fire the first shot, and that would make it much more complicated to get public opinion behind the conflict, while China could easily paint the US as the aggressor.

@MK_ULTRA420

2 жыл бұрын

Or the US is willing to give up a pilot in exchange for casus belli and China is forced for surrender either immediately or eventually. Imagine if China killed a pilot woman of color...

@jan22150

2 жыл бұрын

If China puts up a blockade around Taiwan, then other countries could blockade the straight of Malacca.

@avatarxs

2 жыл бұрын

Blockade is an act of war…

@pissyourselfandshitncoom2172

2 жыл бұрын

@@jan22150 BRI exists for a reason you know

@JohnDoe-nm5le

2 жыл бұрын

@@MK_ULTRA420 sacrificed for the greater good. i like the way you think.

1. All the limitation you mentioned applicable to the US is also applicable to China; 2. China cannot launch its ASBMs as they risk US nuclear response. Pre-launch ambiguity is real.

CG 70 that was my ship! That was also the back of the head of a certain captain that we compared to capt. Brannigan from Futurama. God we where so glad when we got a new capt.

China: *attacks U.S. U.S.: *attacks China Japan: *attacks China Koreas: *attack each other Russia: *attacks Ukraine Germany: *attacks France through Belgium.

@thickboi4304

2 жыл бұрын

German : srry force of habit

@stuartclifton4764

2 жыл бұрын

UK: *invades everywhere*

@walalo2762

2 жыл бұрын

India attacks Pakistan, isreal attacks Iran 🇮🇷

@HRHolm-bi6zu

2 жыл бұрын

Why would Germany attack France? Besides, the Germans don't have the modern equivalents of those erstwhile plentiful panzers, nor Stukas, for starters. Contemporary German command staff would still be more worried about Russia...which would have to go thru Poland, anyway. Poles would likely not stand for that.

@unstablenecrophage278

2 жыл бұрын

@@HRHolm-bi6zu you dont get the joke.

Notice how before every war the Enemy underestimates it

@Ekstrax

2 жыл бұрын

Everyone think they can win is what you are trying to say, and i highly doubt that this is the case before every war

@andrewdoesyt7787

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, true. China does seriously underestimate the US. This is a huge mistake for them.

@stevejones1488

2 жыл бұрын

I dont underetimate chinas ability to expend ALOT of troops, the CCP does not care about its people.

@andrewdoesyt7787

2 жыл бұрын

@John Smith And which country is that?

@andrewdoesyt7787

2 жыл бұрын

@John Smith what a mooroonnnn

Brilliant work.

Although it'd cost China the use of a strong diversion, taking Taiwan first would make a subsequent pushback against the US in the 2nd island chain much simpler. Without a clear, secure route into the Pacific, it doesn't really matter how many naval assets China has, as they are so few possible corridors they can take through the 1st island chain that they will always be sitting ducks. If she can secure the Taiwanese east coast and Orchid islands, then her odds of a successful offensive against Guam or Okinawa improve markedly.

@tedmoss

2 жыл бұрын

That is silly.

This is why the US is building aegis ashore on Guam.

@Joe_Friday

2 жыл бұрын

How well would these systems work against their Dong Feng 21's and 26's?

@michaelp6383

2 жыл бұрын

@@Joe_FridayThe US Navy has SM3's and SM6's for that purpose

@ThatCarGuy

2 жыл бұрын

The SM-3 can take out ICBMs in their midcourse phase, we also have the ground based midcourse defense the fastest missile in the world capable of mach 33, which can also take ICBMs out in their midcourse phase, no other nation has midcourse phase interceptors, all others are terminal.

@Joe_Friday

2 жыл бұрын

@@ThatCarGuy What is the ground based midcourse missile you speak of? The only ones I can think of are GBI missiles but they're based in the US.

@ThatCarGuy

2 жыл бұрын

@@Joe_Friday Correct they are based in the US and once again they are midcourse phase ICBM interceptors. There radar range is around 10,000km as the AN/TPY-2 from THAAD which China and Russia already accused the US of using it to spy has almost 5000km range, and it's only a terminal stage interceptor that's mobile. The LRDR the GBMD uses is not mobile. much larger and more powerful. But it's specs are classified so it could be over 10,000km. Sources below. "The GBI consists of a 3-stage solid rocket boost vehicle which can place it's payload of an Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle outside the earth's atmosphere. In order to do this the missile must reach an escape velocity of more than 6.9 miles per second. This hypersonic speed is several times what a 7.62mm bullet travels leaving the muzzle of a gun. To put it another way, it reaches a speed of approximately Mach 33." "The AN/TPY-2 Surveillance Transportable Radar, also called the Forward Based X-Band Transportable (FBX-T) is a long-range, very high-altitude active digital antenna array X band surveillance radar designed to add a tier to existing missile and air defence systems. It has a range of 2,900 mi (2,500 nmi; 4,700 km)"

Remember though, the US did manage to deploy SIX carrier groups around Iraq in 1990-91. Wartime can generate a lot of initiative. That said, the US had several months to get large numbers of fighters, bombers, tankers, airborne early warning, transports, helos, fighting soldiers, airmen/women, marines, ground support equipment, etc in situ.

@thickboi4304

2 жыл бұрын

@John Smith especially with there new df21d anti ship ballistic missiles

@mrdean171

2 жыл бұрын

@John Smith a carrier group is anything but an easy target lmao. There is a reason china is building carriers of their own. They are the most powerful military weapons on the planet.

@Ahoooooooo

2 жыл бұрын

Every fish in the ocean might be a drone with a mini bomb nowadays. Hundreds of mini bombs togather can make a big explosion. It's like nanotechnology, but a bit bigger . Aircraft carriers could be an easy target , too easy to spot .

@bighands69

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ahoooooooo So are you saying the Chinese navy will be vunerable to drones?

@adrianoon1127

2 жыл бұрын

War is not just about equipment, there is also economic strategy. Today People's Republic of China is not the same as Iraq. It is the second largest economy, third strongest military in the world. War is not just about how advance you are and how many carriers do you have. Don't be naive

A lot of the “if’s” mentioned have to go just perfect for China to actually win.

@HaydenLau.

2 жыл бұрын

Which is why a war with the US is the last thing China wants

Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake - Napoleon Bonaparte. That's why China should never interrupt the USA and let the USA continue to do what they are doing

@SimoDenis

2 жыл бұрын

It's the us who's doing it not china.

The new cold war isn't coming, it's already underway

@Narge.

2 жыл бұрын

Yup only China's much tougher economically than the USSR Id like to see America crumble for once

@sgdhskjvcdjkfsdffwe

2 жыл бұрын

@@Narge. it will be like the reverse of the previous cold war. By 2030, China economy will be larger than US. By 2050, it is projected to be 50% larger.

@Narge.

2 жыл бұрын

@@sgdhskjvcdjkfsdffwe Trump tried to slow them down with the trade war but it didnt work.

@lemenonin

2 жыл бұрын

@@Narge. didnt know you want the social credit system that bad 💀💀💀

@zetos4440

2 жыл бұрын

Worse its already begun, xi even did a speech on how much they couldnt give a shit if they decided to subjugate taiwan

Nice analysis! Hope that level-headed prevail and prevent disastrous war from happening.

@davidmoss2576

2 жыл бұрын

How much hope do you have reading the comment section?

I love your work thank you sir

This video hits different when what your saying is what were currently seeing unfold before our own eyes

Now do a video on how The US military could win against China

@armanaryn8372

2 жыл бұрын

It can't

@birgaripadam7112

2 жыл бұрын

it already has and only now start to lose it out of stupidity

@winstonsyme7672

2 жыл бұрын

It would require US submarines winning big victories forcing the Chinese to stay in harbor with a stand off on both sides. Then the US doesn't replace its loses and China goes back to a massive build up and tries again in a few years.

@x102reddragon

2 жыл бұрын

@@armanaryn8372 it can. Though by no means assured

@TheFish711

2 жыл бұрын

@@winstonsyme7672 I could imagine subversive tactics taken against the three gorges dam and river it sits on could go a long way in paralyzing their industry. Not to mention the casualties sustained if that dam broke.

pls make a book about something related. i have finished reading red dawn after you recommended and started reading trial by fire, which im loving to too! This type of stuff is right up your door! greeting from portugal!

@taktsang5563

2 жыл бұрын

Would like to suggest you a book if I may : A man's view of the world by Lee Kwan Yew . Lee is a former Singaporean president and was nicknamed " The Bruce Lee of Politics ". Hope it will give a few new perspectives of some of your thoughts😊😊

@rradical4714

2 жыл бұрын

@@taktsang5563 I will check out in the future. Thank you for the suggestion!

@ganboonmeng5370

2 жыл бұрын

Red dawn will never happen...who wants to occupy that mess of a nation USA ???

@taktsang5563

2 жыл бұрын

@@rradical4714 You are very welcome！ 😊

@tedmoss

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe up your alley?

Good luck finding the attack sub hanging out in Okinawa. I don't think a covert Tanker will be able to reach Okinawa and have boots on ground.

@Chris-es3wf

2 жыл бұрын

Ikr. Not to mention as soon as Okinawa was attacked every western country would just firebomb china.

Scary how close this coming war seems

It would end up being an economic war of attrition. Without NATO importing Chinese products how long could china last financially vs how much can NATO produce without the assistance of China manufacturing

@doujinflip

2 жыл бұрын

It'd likely hurt China way more. The West can go without cheap TVs, and could simply work more on repair and recycling what they already have until alternative sources get set up; China depends on the open seas for food, fuel, and funds from exports, and scaring away civilian ships with crossfire could lead to China quickly emptying its treasury paying for overland alternatives while increasing domestic "stability" operations against domestic unrest.

@GreyGhostR1

2 жыл бұрын

No! What do without muh latest mobile devices?

@Redsauce101

2 жыл бұрын

Just a note. China would not be reliant on finance in a total war scenario.

@richdobbs6595

2 жыл бұрын

@@Redsauce101 Yeah, international finance is pretty much null and void during the war, and only re-asserts itself in the post-war settlement phase.

@Redsauce101

2 жыл бұрын

@@richdobbs6595 That too. I'd would refer to the fact that China is able to mobilise its entire population overnight to whatever is needed without any need for funds or finance.

One of the sure way to victory is your enemy is over confident and underestimate you.

@davids2cents594

2 жыл бұрын

dont think the us underestimates china. there is a reason the military budget keeps getting bigger

Every aspect of every scenario would be disastrous.

"It takes a long time to prepare a carrier strike group" Which is why we constantly keep them active all over the world... and only phase one out when we have a new one ready to replace it.

What about the economic damage of going to war with your biggest customer.

@Stinger522

2 жыл бұрын

That hasn't stopped people before.

@mrdean171

2 жыл бұрын

@@Stinger522 well the global economic market is much more interconnected in the modern day than it used to be. That is one of the main reasons why wars between powerful nations haven’t happened almost at all since ww2. The damage it would be economically and politically is not worth anything you could gain. The same could not be said 100 years ago.

@kerbodynamicx472

2 жыл бұрын

Lol, Australia in a nutshell

@wz5110

2 жыл бұрын

We can go without cheap TVs, but China can't go without food and oil

1:54 - Skip an AD

@puzanfish7705

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks

It seems unlikely any major country would go all out . Considering loss to gain ratio , it would have to get really bad to start that fire

Win? We'll all be lucky to survive! No freakin' winners!

Just made my day lol!! Love your videos man!

Lol i was rechearching about this and then i see a notification that you posted about it

Yeah, man, we got a lot on our plate. Start getting ready.

Maybe I missed something, but it would seem to be really stupid for China to attack US forces on Okinawa in a scenario in which Japan is not pulled into the fighting. In such a scenario, Okinawa is probably neutralized as a base of operations against China due to diplomatic pressure from Japan, in-case anyone has forgotten - Okinawa is Japanese territory. An unprovoked attack on US Forces in Okinawa would almost certainly draw Japan in, (heck an attack on the uninhabited, Japanese-administered Senkaku Islands is pretty likely to cause Japanese intervention,) significantly escalating the conflict, and making it significantly more difficult for China to secure a quick and decisive victory. I normally enjoy your videos, but I think this one is quite a stretch.

@jevinliu4658

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, however maintaining the First Island Chain and the trade that goes to Japan through Taiwan's eastern side is very crucial too. So it depends on whether or not China thinks that Japanese involvement is a foregone conclusion or not.

@czechchineseamerican

2 жыл бұрын

@@jevinliu4658 True, though 'legally binding' defense agreements aside, I doubt Japanese intervention would have any support amongst the Japanese public unless China did something provocative like attacking Japanese territory, military assets, or citizens. If the government intervenes without clear and domestically popular justification, then it will be that much easier for China to pressure Japan to return to the sidelines and cease its intervention.

@truezyf

2 жыл бұрын

yep, it is really crazy for japanese, to think about war against china. today is not 1937.

@haikaloronsentnel138

2 жыл бұрын

JAPANESE NEVER DARES TO INTERVENT!0N IN REUN!F!CAT!0N 0F CH!NA TA!WAN!!! JAPAN 0NLY G00D EN0UGH T0 DEFENCE IT'S SELF!!! N0 F0R ASS!ST 0R ATTACK 0THER C0UNTR!ES!!!

@carkawalakhatulistiwa

Жыл бұрын

Okinawa is USA colony

RIP to those that died in Afghanistan.

@ronjeremy5826

2 жыл бұрын

F them

@randomuser5443

2 жыл бұрын

@@ronjeremy5826 okay sock puppet

@golamrabbi9151

2 жыл бұрын

Died killing civilian's*

@Phreekanon

2 жыл бұрын

@@ronjeremy5826 fu

@Ass_of_Amalek

2 жыл бұрын

RIP to those about to die in afghanistan

A few things to keep in mind. The PRC is the number one importer of crude oil and foodstuff and eatable oils. It would not need to be a close restrictions but the threat of war raises shipping insurance rates that are unsustainable

@DavyRo

2 жыл бұрын

A few things for you to keep in mind. Russia is the world's 2nd biggest exporter of crude oil. Its biggest customer is its neighbour - China. Russia & China are defacto allies. There's 2 pipelines running from Rus to Chi already with a 3rd in the planning. What we're you saying about shipping again?

@Dog.soldier1950

2 жыл бұрын

@@DavyRo haha. War starts prices triple be it a pack train or a pipeline I would not bet too heavily on Russia as an ally who would see no gain on a war PRC is bound to lose

@Fermonos1

2 жыл бұрын

@@DavyRo Really a pipeline you say? A stationary object what runs for MILES & MILES. One Brimstone or a Sidewinder would put a stop to all of that.

In war...there are no winners, only losers & thats the people and destruction that happened.

@6:56 "Use the conventional n order to engage and the unconventional in order to achieve victory."~ Sun Tzu

They can ask Taliban a question, "how win a war against US with troops in flip flops?" Or "how to get 85 billion worth of equipment in 10 days?"

@benjamindixon3512

2 жыл бұрын

Sad but true

@lorwally13

2 жыл бұрын

@@benjamindixon3512 85 billion of equipment given to a allied government not the usa leaving it & if we really wanted to we could bomb & air strike all equipment left behind but most of the equipment is old asf anyways & will be nonoperational in a year 1-2

@hphp31416

2 жыл бұрын

How to win a war against superpower: 1. Let them easily counquer your whole country 2. Destroy your economy with constant attacks and warfare. 3. Superpower realises ocupation is not worth it's price 4. Victory, now you can enjoy your destroyed country with medieval economy.

@artiombeknazaryan7542

2 жыл бұрын

@@hphp31416 Afghanistan was a medieval country before the war. No NAVY, no Airforce, no Social Security. Only an idiot would have attacked them. Oh pardon me idiots are ruling the US at least for the last 30 years.

@Spectre-wd9dl

2 жыл бұрын

@@artiombeknazaryan7542 its also one of the most mineral rich country on the planet.

How can the chinese operate the controls when they're hands are covered in honey.

@TheFish711

2 жыл бұрын

Oh Bother

@10000words1

2 жыл бұрын

Eeeey orrrrre

@Ass_of_Amalek

2 жыл бұрын

their

@yewsingooi9573

2 жыл бұрын

Being sarcasm wont bring you anywhere, in fact, with such thinking is the reason why the West are falling behind to China. Always live in your own imagination and ignored the facts and underestimated them.

@10000words1

2 жыл бұрын

@@yewsingooi9573 But without imagination, how would the west invent all the useful and beautiful things for china to copy? 🤔

i notice how he didn't mention both countries are smart enough not to start a war because they both know it would come down to nukes

@smokeypuppy417

2 жыл бұрын

Definitely, if 10,000 Americans and 15+ billion$ were about to be lost or just were lost, congress/ the chief of staff,and even sleepy Joe would all elect to start nuclear operations immediately.

My prediction is it will be Taiwan, USA, Japan, Australia, and India vs China. Russia will provide supply but won't fight while N Korea and S Korea will stare down each other.

@hermitcrab6923

2 жыл бұрын

The extent to which they participate in the actual battle is subtle, but I think Britain, France and the Netherlands will also be listed in the Allies.

Judging by recent events, they could just leave us alone and we will win it for them.

China's plan to counter relies heavily on their ability to replicate their adversaries military tech and tactics. Unfortunately it also depends largely on the individual abilities of the PLA/PLAN and the training given to those servicemembers. All the advanced military technology China has aquired over the last few decades is only as effective as their targeting systems, GPS and the problem-solving skills of their missile force. Of course, German U-boats off the coast of the US wasnt seen as a possibility until they were already a viable threat to commerce and travel. It would be unwise to assume the CCP are unable to reach out and touch us.

@kuanged

2 жыл бұрын

You don't think the Chinese are smart enough to effectively use the weapons they've created? They know the entire US playbook and have studied their tactics for decades. Neither the US nor Chinese forces have fought a great power since Korea (which the US did not win) so the US does not have an edge in experience just because they have been fighting wars continuously. Also, China's military objectives do not require a 100% victory. They just need a stalemate to win. If they can hurt the US badly in the Pacific to convince the entire world will shift away from the US dollar as the reserve currency. After all, the US will certainly just print several trillion to fund their China war. If they borrow that much money but China can still cause a stalemate (i.e. US lose pacific bases, supercarriers) global investors will lose faith in the US regardless of China's military losses. Why bet on a country that is already saddled by unrepayable debt and ALSO not the CLEAR winner in a conflict? It will not be Chinese weapons that destroy America, it will be a loss of faith in America that does it in.

@arunprasath764

2 жыл бұрын

@@kuanged India and Australia entry in war 😂😂😂😂

@jbone9900

2 жыл бұрын

@@kuanged china lost the Korean war as well because south Korea still exist.

@achong007

2 жыл бұрын

It's even worst that thanks to Biden F-up in Afgan, China has a treasure trove of American Tech now. Same with OBama. We just lost a small advantage point now no thanks to Biden. Impeach Biden, Harris, Nancy, and recall all Democraps from all offices in America. Defund the Democrap party. Don't believe me, then Deep dive every Democrap bill and law and see how it sounds good but in the end screw you over like the forbidden fruit that it is from the Garden of Eden. Start cutting open the fruit people before you bite into it. Eve didn't learn the first time. She had better learn now along with Adam.

@TenOrbital

2 жыл бұрын

@@achong007 - this civil war mentality is what weakens America. Despite the crude simple nature of the CCP dictatorship, and the low bar of law and order it represents, the bulk of the population support it. While Americans hysterically and pointlessly hate each other.

If the US Base in Subic Philippines still remain today, would that make a difference?

CHina has never been a belligerent force. There is no reason for the USA and China to even think of war. It is a crazy thought.

@elperrodelautumo7511

2 жыл бұрын

Keep in mind, they fought the Chinese civil war and the communists won. They fought with North Korea during the Korean War. Also they fought against India in the Sino Indian war in 1962. Also the Sino Vietnam war in 1979.

Its not even a contest anymore. Its merely one side waiting out to systematically annihilate the other at their convenience.

"tchhhhhyynaahhhhh" _-some orange dude_

@b.griffin317

2 жыл бұрын

He's gone, we have a new idiot now.

@reee_4067

2 жыл бұрын

When he will be reinstated? I heard he got supposedly reinstated on a monthly basis lol

They both can’t even beat the vietnamese in 1975 and 1979 😆

You forgot Camp Humphrey in Korea (Seoul)... the largest power projection platform of the USA!

I believe the good old strategy for the US and Allies will still work well....just take control of the choke points like Malacca Strait, The Suez Canal, The Strait of Hormuz, etc. It will devastate the Chinese export and oil imports, eventually hurting the Chinese economy so much that it has to give up.

@totifaddye6587

2 жыл бұрын

These videos if you look precisely 1. The dude isnt apart of a Central Intelligence agency these 2 countrys arent stupid nor is the U.S. alone it isnt a idiot these youtubers look for local information while Intelligence Agencies go off of Federal Info so its funny to see this type of stuff becuase these same types of videos were made but for WW2 it wasnt a video but recorded conversations of Locals talking about it

@Ass_of_Amalek

2 жыл бұрын

what would that achieve? china is going to take taiwan in a week with no other military firing a shot. retroactive finger-wagging won't do anything.

@tamalmondal8550

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ass_of_Amalek agreed, in current situation I too believe that US will not go to war just for Taiwan, I was saying from a US vs China perspective if a war really breaks out, which is the theme of the video as well.....and even though the threat is real, Chaina has a long way to go to invade Taiwan considering possible high death toll on Chinese side as well and post war consequences.

@arjen20

2 жыл бұрын

@@tamalmondal8550 post war consequences #cancel_china lmao

@tamalmondal8550

2 жыл бұрын

@@arjen20 LOL, in india #boycott_china works

Modern USA following the same path as Soviet Union, while modern China is like 1930s USA

@fadoobaba

2 жыл бұрын

Not really. China has no innovation. Just copies stuff.

@iVETAnsolini

2 жыл бұрын

China copies everyone so 0 innovation

@shinchan-F-urmom

2 жыл бұрын

@@fadoobabachina is dumb because she can only copy USA is more dumb because they allow China to copy Other countries are the DUMBEST because they can't even copy

@guycross493

2 жыл бұрын

Copying is the starting point of innovation. Instead of spending more on making something original, copying something that works, and modifying it to what suits them later, and improve upon it, is far more cost effective. School teaches us cheating doesn't make you win, but that's a whole different story in war.

@Jay-qb9gi

2 жыл бұрын

@@guycross493 “improve”

And yet none of y’all wanna have diplomatic ties with Taiwan and you are talking about sacrificing your countrymen’ s lives to protect Taiwan?

_Terrorising terror was the best job I ever had_

You forgot to mention Taiwan's defense system of the island which is planned to slow down a possible Chinese invasion.

I wonder why catapults are so difficult to develop? It seems like rocket assisted takeoff might be a simple alternative that would actually allow their planes to take off with fuel and weapons.

@hedgehog3180

2 жыл бұрын

It's very difficult to figure out how to quickly accelerate 200 million dollars worth of high tech equipment while also not destroying it in the process and then making sure this catapult can survive being at sea which is one of the most hostile environments on this planet. Rockets are not a solution because that means you have to carry even more stuff on your carrier meaning you'll have less space for ammo, fuel and planes, and it limits the number of takeoffs you can perform.

@tedmoss

2 жыл бұрын

Try it I did.

4:18 oh shit … that’s right down the road from me 😂😳 shout out PSNS ⚓️

What would China's attack sub doctrine look like? I guess anti-shipping would be too much for them. Or maybe not?

The joke when the commentator says " china has to figure a way out" while the U.S has everything figured out..

@DavyRo

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly, I'm British & know for a fact the US solution to everything is throw more money at a problem until it goes away. They tried it in Afghanistan so when it fails they've got no answers strategy or know how. So they run away leaving their allies in the crap, & 68 billion dollars worth of weapons as a parting gift. Honestly you couldn't make it up of how unprofessional & pathetic they are.

@YasirshahJehan

2 жыл бұрын

@@DavyRo Well, I wouldn't agree with your statment, The war in Afghanistan was covered by the Oil from IRAQ and the mess they left in Afghanistan is so huge cleaning it up is almost impossible...and they left a mess deliberately...watch 2022

@MattU4970

2 жыл бұрын

If you think the US Military has everything figured out, I invite you to revisit the botched retrograde operation from Afghanistan.

The one thing that I believe that you overlooked is the scale of this invasion of Taiwan that you mentioned. I would imagine it would have to be at least 1/2 the size of Operation Overlord. That means that this invasion would be easily detected. This means a strike like the one that you mention must be done as a preemptive strike months before any invasion of Taiwan. Otherwise troops will be on alert and things like sending 1,000 guys on a transport with no way of being supplied and reinforced to Okinawa is not going to work.

@mustavogaia2655

2 жыл бұрын

IIRC thte distance is 4-5 times bigger. Somewhere I've heard that the invasion fleet would be on the open for many hours.

@jimsackmanbusinesscoaching1344

2 жыл бұрын

@@mustavogaia2655 Oh, its much worse than that. The D-Day landings took 150K men and nearly 7,000 ships. There is no way to gather a force 1/2 that size in anything less than days, once it exists. That is why this kind of strike has to be before any invasion. Heck, the world will have years of warning before this could even possibly happen.

@user-qx2ed9op3i

2 жыл бұрын

Also there are 200k Taiwanese troops on the island, don’t think China can spare that many ships and planes if they are “also” invading Taiwan. Maybe they mistake Taiwan with Singapore?

@rdelrosso2001

2 жыл бұрын

There is also the consensus that the D-Day Landing of June 6th, 1944, could NEVER have happened the way it did, if the Germans had spy Satellites in Earth orbit to detect the Invasion and that it was heading for NORMANDY and NOT the Palais De Calais, as Ike led the Germans to think it was.

@tedmoss

2 жыл бұрын

@@rdelrosso2001 Generalship is paramount.

Undoubtably - not a word. Undoubtedly is a word.

China can NEVER stop the US from blocking maritime trade to China, if the US so desires. Meanwhile, China can never blockade the US. We don't have choke points, the way China does in the Malaccas.

@wolf.04210

2 жыл бұрын

Yep that's true, and if you look at it NATO and her Allies can survive without doing business with china while china can't survive without NATO and her Allies.

@SangiinKherem

2 жыл бұрын

You are forgetting that the USA and Europe are the biggest trade partners of China, meaning that in case of war they won't be trading anyways also leading to many shortages in Europe and the U.S. Also China is pushing its Belt and road initiative, so it can trade with Europe, Africa and Asia without being intercepted by the US navy

After reading "Irresistible Revolution" my confidence in the military is very low.

@richpryor9650

2 жыл бұрын

Damn, you guys are scapegoating Marxist more than the Third Reich.

@dgafbrapman688

2 жыл бұрын

@@richpryor9650 Blaming someone for something that theyre guilty of is not a scape goat. be gone troll

In the case of Taiwan, China would seek to create the same kind of war as what happened in Korea and the Falklands. This would be where there's a sort of designated zone of conflict where conventional fighting between the great powers is permitted but going outside risks a nuclear exchange. This would vastly mitigate (though not totally eliminate) the US initial advantage with forward positions in Japan and the RoK. If the PLA can lock down the water and airspace around Taiwan, and seize enough land there, any counterattack would either have to be in the teeth of PLA antiship/anti-aircraft defenses or risk escalation into a nuclear exchange.

@deprecor1

2 жыл бұрын

yeah, the scenario of China attacking the US to invade Taiwan makes no sense. It's not the Chinese way of war and it would be a total waste of resources. Downvoted the video.

@hphp31416

2 жыл бұрын

China has not enough nukes to assure mutual destruction with USA

@Spectre-wd9dl

2 жыл бұрын

China would have to build a real navy and air force first.

@george4281

2 жыл бұрын

@@deprecor1 I think it's propaganda. This guy also made a comment in his video that the U.S. didn't know Pearl Harbor was going to be attacked and pretends not to know China attacking U.S. bases violates NATO Article 5 which drags all members without exception. He makes it seems as American allies have a chance of not being involved or like America will agree to peace after they are attacked. They have been suing for war and they will not stop because it's the best way to end China and war is the only thing the U.S. is genuinely good at.

In the first invasion of Ethiopia the emperor made sure that Italy was absolutely convinced that the Ethiopians didn't have any modern gun or cannons to fight back while he secretly stock pikes guns and cannons he was buying from the Russia Empire. The Italians fell for it and marched to their deaths.

Never underestimate the enemy.

I'd rather be forced to speak russian than chinese

@JohnSmith-kw6io

2 жыл бұрын

I'd rather be forced to speak chinese than spanish

@woodonfire7406

2 жыл бұрын

I rather take anything other than Chinese Iran or South Sudan even

@Lavalle.mp3

2 жыл бұрын

Whats the deal with China? Its a great country. The CCP thats the problem.

@niggacockball7995

2 жыл бұрын

@@Lavalle.mp3 i dont hate their country i just hate the chinese

@usun_current5786

2 жыл бұрын

Well Russia is diverse and won't try to assimilate you at least. China strategy is always of full assimilation. Ironically they built a modern natsoc state.

This was a great laugh. Thank you.

@roxorz309

2 жыл бұрын

Sun never sets on the British Empire eh?

@eugene7145

2 жыл бұрын

@@roxorz309 ????

@alexy6093

2 жыл бұрын

Why laugh? We couldn't even handle Afghanistan.

@freddiepizerhall8324

2 жыл бұрын

You couldn’t defeat China in Korea when they were weak asf, you think you could defeat them now? Haha

@greattribulation1388

2 жыл бұрын

@@alexy6093 we handled Afghanistan, the politicians screwed it up

Also, don't think that your friend today its your friend tomorrow.

I don't want to go to war but if war come to me or my allies.im not having to choice but to fight back

Accroding to what happened in 2016, it's more like a gathering every force in one battle kind situation.

US carriers do have cycles, but I think in Desert Storm we put like 3 or 4 carriers in the Red Sea alone.

@Jump-n-smash

2 жыл бұрын

The premise is that the Chinese have the initiative.

@thickboi4304

2 жыл бұрын

It’s to risky having more that 2 carries China got the new df21d anti ship ballistic missiles that can easily overwhelm the ships n destroy them N there is also the Chinese navy current it bigger that the USA With there submarine that can do heavy damage to a carrier strike groups It’s too risky

@DavyRo

2 жыл бұрын

Do you think the Chinese are going to sit & watch a carrier group or groups travel the full Pacific & let them attack? Let's get some reality here China isn't Iraq or anything like it.

I think a strike on Okinawa would almost 100% drag Japan into a conflict

@njpme

2 жыл бұрын

💯

When it comes to Taiwan, China’s problem is the island’s’ geography. There aren’t many suitable beaches to land on and the whole island has been preparing for an invasion for many decades. China has a huge military but they cannot all crowd onto small spaces that might be optimal for taking the island .

@davidmoss2576

7 ай бұрын

You have no idea how little interest Taiwan has in fighting war.

China: Write That down, Write That down

Attacking Guam - which is US territory - and hope for a modest response which could lead to a tactical advantage for China after the conflict? Does not sound reasonable.

They don't need to sink US aircraft carriers. They just need to put a hole on the deck of US carriers to prevent aircraft from take off and landing. They launch 100 DF missiles and 10% hit the target is enough to disable 10 carriers. Then they can invade Taiwan without interference from USA.

The incredibly dicey circumstances outlined here convince me even more of the unlikelihood of a Chinese first strike. It’s just not in China’s interest to start a conventional war at this time when they are already so handily winning at commerce and trade.

@TeleologicalConsistency

2 жыл бұрын

That's why the US is doing everything it can to provoke a war by trying to get Taiwan to declare independence.

@Grimloxz

2 жыл бұрын

@@TeleologicalConsistency If China REALLY wanted to expose the West, what China in my opinion OUGHT to do is drop all claims to Taiwan and seek to formally normalize relations with the tiny island. Look, Taiwan is nothing compared to China - they have them beat by every conceivable metric. Ok, Taiwan is a hyper advanced state with an arsenal pointed at the mainland, but China has the same pointed right back and is far more capable of defending itself. Any provocation or action by Taiwan would DEVASTATE them. They must know that. Just normalize relations with them. Taiwan will already fall into China’s orbit in the next 50 years with its continued economic dominance.

@TeleologicalConsistency

2 жыл бұрын

@@Grimloxz That's not going to work at all. Taiwan's elites and government have been captured by the US already. Trying to make any sort of deals based on mutual interests is totally pointless. It's akin to trying to reason with a zombie. Before any kind of reconciliation can happen US interests and US backed elites must be purged from Taiwan. Since the Taiwanese are incapable of doing it then it falls to China to step in to liberate the island.

@TeleologicalConsistency

2 жыл бұрын

@@Grimloxz Remember Yuri Bezmonov's lectures on subversion. A society that has been fully subverted cannot be freed from the inside. It requires military intervention. Taiwan is exactly this type of situation. It's been fully subverted by the US over the course of the last several decades.

@Grimloxz

2 жыл бұрын

@@TeleologicalConsistency EXACTLY. That’s what I mean by “expose them”. The narrative has been that it’s the CCP that’s being obstinate when I’d have it that as you said, it’s Taiwan’s US influenced government and elites who are. China wouldn’t be “negotiating” as much as revealing the game. Just reverse trajectory and say “OK, be your own nation, we’ll even recognize you” and watch them squirm.

To ask a serious question, unleashing the Corona virus when healthcare care costs in the USA are out of control and a Achilles heel? What if an adversary sees that the US would collapse economically and therefore be domestically too distracted or weak to fight? Maybe the combination of animosity between rural/urban, cyber attack, pandemic has changed our focus already?

@JohnDoe-nm5le

2 жыл бұрын

or maybe a good media campaign can convince people to forget about those things and focus on a more important threat... people often forget that part of why the US did so well in wwii was because of the efforts of its citizens in production. apparently the US alone supplied 2/3rds of the supplies for the allies during the war because of a national effort.

@oneof6billionpeople

2 жыл бұрын

@@JohnDoe-nm5le Well, after the war our infrastructure was intact while the rest of the world was destroyed. We also amassed huge amounts of gold BEFORE WWII under the Trading with the enemy act of 1917. After the war, Breton Woods made the $ the reserve currency of the word and secured American hegemony. Since 1973, the gold window was closed and even though productivity per worker grew rapidly in the US, the wages and wealth of the working class stagnated. None of the gains in productivity or the stock market trickled down to the middle class.

@Trebelsi

10 ай бұрын

"Unleashing the coronavirus" If you read this, please unleash less then 5 minutes if your life and look up "event 201" in any search bar. A global coronavirus pandemic exercise from a month before covid. Look at who hosted the pandemic practice exercise on their page. Not China, the white knights we saw on TV. Their latest global pandemic readiness exercise was called "catastrophic cantagion".

History dictates that it has always been about resources, and the power over them.

@kenfelix8703

2 жыл бұрын

Oil

@aksmex2576

2 жыл бұрын

US blockades oil to China.

@slslbbn4096

2 жыл бұрын

Fun fact: Americans don't realize it, but Taiwan is the bait to set up a killzone for China to lure then eliminate US forces cheaply there

@goda7137

2 жыл бұрын

@@slslbbn4096 it same I see Taiwan similar to pearl harbor in world war 2 a bait by the American.

@slslbbn4096

2 жыл бұрын

@@goda7137 except Taiwan and the encroaching waters are all within kill range of most Chinese missiles. A perfect killzone. Only the blind won't be able to see it

Assuming the carriers are not already operating in the area..

They are actually starting to win now. without a single bullet fired.

Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face...

I think the most likely scenario China would push for is to force the Taiwanese government to surrender within days, which I can see happening to be honest. Not because they're so weak willed like the Afghan government but because the cost inflicted by missile barrages and a blockade would be too great to withstand for the Taiwanese population, used to very high living standards.

@tykila1

10 ай бұрын

I believe too the "far right" in taiwan wants china to take over anyways....

We already fought them to a draw in the Korean War.

Tungsten rods in deep atmosphere is the answer. I’m talking 300 ton tungsten rods. But one of those would flatten 200 square miles at 700000 MPs.

@whoismrpib

2 жыл бұрын

Too expensive to move that kind of weight

8:50 hey i've seen this one in the world in conflict game but the enemy is Soviet attacking US west cost using cargo ship

Correction: China has more Hulls in Ships but the USA has far more Tonnage in Ship Size and Firepower! The Chinese Aircraft can't even compare to US Airpower.

@tedmoss

2 жыл бұрын

Except in their ability to fall apart without notice.

@willwozniak2826

2 жыл бұрын

US has better trained pilots...🙂

There will be at least 2 US carriers deployed to the western Pacific as well as the Japanese light carriers and the rest of the Japanese Naval and Airforce assets. The US allies will also have an increased presence in the area. It appears at this point that it will be the PLA vs Taiwan, Japan and whatever US military assets are in the Western Pacific. The rest of the allies will play a minimal role, unless there happens to be a European carrier in the area.