Would you ride in a C919?

@antoniobabb1938

Ай бұрын

No but still better than Boeing I guess.

@skinnybricks

Ай бұрын

I mean, it's probably fine.

@sadihy

Ай бұрын

Not until it's certified by EASA and/or the FAA.

@lindafukuyu5767

Ай бұрын

Yes, I will !

@alileevil

Ай бұрын

Over a Boeing? Definitely!

I don’t think EU or US would certify C919. This is not a reflection of C919 quality or safety or anything. It is just protectionism.

@TRONTC

24 күн бұрын

Bhahah by that argument they shouldn't certify a Embraer or a B or A . They will certify it. It's more or less a western + Chinese combo aircraft. Though on account of Geopolitical issues it'll take a little longer and be more in-depth. Looking forward to more competition in the market and flying on a. C919 soon.

@Unclesam404

23 күн бұрын

Well think of it this way. China buy tons of of airbus. So China will get EU certification. US certification is not needed given the geopolitical situation. And after all, China can’t produce enough for themselves why export ? China will buy 0 Boeing airplanes from now on.

@davidz7858

23 күн бұрын

C919 could be survived with domestic market and Asia, Africa and South America market. Its main goat is to prove its liabilities and save.

@NadeemAhmed-nv2br

23 күн бұрын

​@@Unclesam404china demand requirements is ironically so high that they'll bite their tongue and continue buying Boeing. Of course comac and Airbus they never stopped buying from but their demand is so large that even these 3 combined aren't enough to satisfy demand so Embraer will probably still in also. Of course, most of the components for all 4 makers come from those handful of European and American companies

@Unclesam404

23 күн бұрын

@@NadeemAhmed-nv2br hehe has China ever bought/deliver any Boeing aircraft since the Trump trade war ? Can you please do some research ?

At this point, any new airplane manufacture is better than Boeing.

@trentkenzler8478

Ай бұрын

Unless it's made in China. Tofu buildings, tin can navy.

@shawncheng404

Ай бұрын

Stupid idea

@ogasdiaz

29 күн бұрын

@@gravelDave after MCAS fiasco and the ripped off window it's not about beliefs anymore.

@johnwinter7597

28 күн бұрын

That’s such a lame statement

@user-jt5cn9qh1z

28 күн бұрын

Why ? ​@@shawncheng404

later they will say China has overcapacity in plane 😂

@widodoakrom3938

26 күн бұрын

Lol true

@souria1671

21 күн бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣👍👍 Quand c’était eux qui produisaient pendant bien longtemps, il n’y avait aucun problème 😌

@samiah21

20 күн бұрын

😂

@eyeonchina2023

18 күн бұрын

Not likely since it uses western parts. 😂

@yiquny

14 күн бұрын

​@@eyeonchina2023logic? Be aware Boeing uses Chinese components

Comac doesn’t need to break up the duopoly, Boeing will do it for them…

@xuchen4012

24 күн бұрын

monopoly is worse ...

@lancewood1410

5 күн бұрын

yep, japanese calls it harakiri LOL.

It won't be hard for China to beat boeing quality.

@Louis1059

Ай бұрын

CCP quality is the same as Boeing lol

@user-tt6il2up4o

Ай бұрын

@@Louis1059higher than boeing

@ericyeo1454

Ай бұрын

If china is low quality, boeing is usable quality. Even boeing workers say they wont board if its an boeing plane. LMAO

@zacksmith5963

Ай бұрын

​@@Louis1059 and u have proof of today😂

@jeremyknight1927

Ай бұрын

@@user-tt6il2up4o how's it higher if their designs are stolen from Boeing?

What kind of person would complain about having another player to break the duopoly market?

@user-jo9xh9yg7o

26 күн бұрын

美国 台湾

@darthvadeth6290

24 күн бұрын

jealous and hateful people, lol

@nuevision8

24 күн бұрын

The same people that go to court to keep the Green Party off of elections ballots in many states...

@ervinabdullah881

14 күн бұрын

Boing and Airbus fan will surely against any Chinese and Russia made airplane.

@ahmedzakikhan7639

11 күн бұрын

Same reason Tik Tok got banned.

Boeing CEO just said Comac planes are equivalent to their offering. So why not choose Comac, when Boeing’s planes are dismantling in midair.

@TomNook.

29 күн бұрын

Because it takes a lot of time to make them

@BS-vm5bt

27 күн бұрын

Why not airbus that have non of the issues boeing got.

@martinishot

23 күн бұрын

With 737 MAX doors maybe not bolted on. With C919 wings, engines, fuselage sections, landing gear, tail, passenger seats, overhead bins, jump seats, coffee maker(you read that right) maybe not bolted on.

@martinishot

22 күн бұрын

I'm sure he said equivalent to their offerings 30 even 40 years ago. The technology is so old and they will be paying so much more for fuel.

@MSDGroup-ez6zk

22 күн бұрын

@@martinishot look at China EV, does it take 30-40 years to develop it?

Certification from the FAA is meaningless... It didnt save those people from dying on those boeng aircrafts, did it????

@darrellgorsuch5599

Ай бұрын

no, it did not - because the FAA had outsourced the the certification process to boeing itself, in effect

@kamalabrahman6925

Ай бұрын

FAA has bad reputation and no longer a independent body for airplane certification...

@steveablet4041

Ай бұрын

@@kamalabrahman6925 the accidents are unfortunate, but will make aviation safer. too bad people buy into media hysteria.

@kamalabrahman6925

Ай бұрын

@steveablet4041 Accidents can be prevented if you have taken the out hazards This is by taking the preventive measures and recovery measures.... But if you omit all these safety procedures, then you are planning for failure..

@steveablet4041

Ай бұрын

@@kamalabrahman6925 Not entirely true. Even following every procedure can still result in accidents. Some are predictable and some are not. There are some accidents in aviation that no person on the planet could have thought of. You have an unrealistic expectation that things made by humans are perfect.

If China replace half of its domestic market with ARJ21, C919, C929, that would be big blow to Airbus and Boeing.

@luffirton

Ай бұрын

The big question is will Chinese airlines trust them enough to buy them and will Chinese passengers want to fly with them, like right now people are saying if it’s a Boeing I’m not going. Reputation in this industry is everything

@davidchen3503

29 күн бұрын

@@luffirton China Eastern Airline is flying four C919, daily.

@MulaFresh-bi3mq

27 күн бұрын

​@@luffirton You slow

@calvinkong6849

27 күн бұрын

Airbus should be more disastrous

@antonsjoberg

24 күн бұрын

@@davidchen3503 4 is nothing

For now chinas ambition is not overseas but being self-reliance and independent from Western monopoly

@matiasavellanal5244

Ай бұрын

except it isn't cause most of the parts are western made

@John_.Cabell_.Breckinridge

Ай бұрын

Then why make it with so many Western components? Even Bombardier played a role in its design

@siddharthgoyal4008

Ай бұрын

@@John_.Cabell_.Breckinridge because it makes sense to start initially with known and working parts. Even in Solar industry initially China leveraged German suppliers, eventually it added more value chain and now China has absolute domination over Solar industry across all verticals.

@backemf89

Ай бұрын

@@John_.Cabell_.Breckinridge what's wrong with that? you live in an open free market globalized world. Even being and Airbus gets their critical mineral and material supplied from China.

@John_.Cabell_.Breckinridge

Ай бұрын

@@siddharthgoyal4008 but China has had an aviation industry since the 1950s and to this day most of their jets have western components or are based on a Russian design.

Airbus: it no different from what airbus and boeing already have. Comac: yes, but it will be cheaper.

@hakanevin8545

Ай бұрын

I wouldn't bet on that. Comac is using the same parts as Boeing and Airbus which have the advantage of economy of scale. Comac will need a long time to reduce their costs down to Boeing and Airbus level, maybe they will never make it. Their target is not being cheap, but making China less dependent.

@pjacobsen1000

Ай бұрын

The list price is almost identical. No airlines pay the list price, but it is never made public what the real price is.

@regorflora7915

Ай бұрын

@@hakanevin8545are the chinese capable of reverse engineering those spare part?

@hakanevin8545

Ай бұрын

@@regorflora7915 Sure they are. Chinese mobile phones are more high tech than the best selling aircraft A320 designed in 1980s. Bu do they need reverse engineering? Those parts are already available to Chinese companies.

@marcmcreynolds2827

Ай бұрын

@@hakanevin8545 Speaking of "A320" and "1980s", a big drawback to the C919 is that it matches up against a 1980s A320 rather than a current one. It's not competitive with current offerings, other than perhaps on price. Payload is significantly less and fuel burned is higher.

If COMAC takes 50% of Chinese domestic market it is 25% of sales from Boeing and Airbus

@MSDGroup-ez6zk

22 күн бұрын

Plus its massive 160 countries of its China silk road member markets.

the same FAA who certified 737 max will certify comac ? 🤣🤣🤣

@lancewood1410

5 күн бұрын

Why would Comac need faa certification if they don't intend to fly to americaaaaaa :)

How can you underestimate the Chinese at anything these days 1) They were forbidden on the International Space Station, in less than 10yrs they have a superior station in place. 2) Their cars were laughed at 10yrs ago, now Elon Musk wants heavy protection in the west against Chinese EVs. 3) They were sanctioned and it was thought they can at best make 14nm chips. Well, 7nm last year and 5nm this year. With Lithography machines coming. 4) Their navy was laughed at 15yrs ago. Now the type 55 destroyer of PLAN is being copied by the US navy. Simply compared to image to the proposed DDGX to the already in service type 55. 5) We were gonna have the first railgun. Opps, it is canceled now. While the Chinese have field tested theirs on a ship 2yrs ago! Now developing railgun launching system for out of space. I can go on, but I don't have enough zoloft and xanax for that.

@JigilJigil

Ай бұрын

1 - They've a space station that is totally based on 50 years old Russia\Soveit technologies, with no innovation, the technology that belongs to museum as Russia was not able to advanced it further after the soviet fall, funny is that, the Chinese couldn't even make the docking system and ask Russians to transfered the tech as well. 2 - Their EVs are nothing but low quality fire hazard cars, and based on stolen tech from Tesla (read the recent WSJ article about quality of BYD and other Chinese EVs.)

@cabasadefogo9533

Ай бұрын

@@JigilJigil sour grapes 🍇 much?

@trentkenzler8478

Ай бұрын

@@cabasadefogo9533 Tengping, wumao!! Don't believe the lies of your CCP masters!!

@lol-wd5cw

Ай бұрын

@@JigilJigiltell me you know nothing about china without telling me you know nothing about china

@JigilJigil

Ай бұрын

@@lol-wd5cw OK wumao.

It is a long way to go for COMAC. Luckily, China has a big market for it to grow up.

@Akash-uq8wg

Ай бұрын

1000+ orders, you bet they will catch up

@jogana6909

Ай бұрын

After the introduction of China cars in Australia, the prices of both EV and ICE vehicle have dropped, and consumers are the beneficiaries of competition (including those who have not bought China cars).

@Akash-uq8wg

Ай бұрын

@@jogana6909 yup those ridiculous profits tesla made, so it could afford stock by backs are over. Now its harder to inflate their stock.

@nerrailwaygorakhpur7173

Ай бұрын

​@@jogana6909what you want to say? Can you believe they will Catchup or not?

@jogana6909

Ай бұрын

@@nerrailwaygorakhpur7173 What I want to say is that competition is better than monopoly.

Comac needs to make it's move and assure it's quality now while Boeing is struggling

The hosts couldn't even call the name of 737max, instead calling it 737 family lmao.

@Adrian_Nel

26 күн бұрын

@jiaqishen2810 Nothing wrong with that. Absolutely nothing. One might also speak, for one easy example, of a 'family of engines'as in, Ford's Eco Boost family of engines have some known weak points.

@9999AWC

22 күн бұрын

Because the entire 737 lineup is still relevant today, especially the NG and even the 200 from the 70s.

All three aircraft in the thumbnail are Airbus A320 aircraft. Don't go to MSM for aviation news...

@diamesarr1500

Ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@felixonetwothree2245

Ай бұрын

Loool

@tailsorange2872

Ай бұрын

Says a person who can't see the difference between the models.

@Artemie-np3qu

Ай бұрын

Are you blind

@ryanlittleton5615

Ай бұрын

@@tailsorange2872 It has since been changed I swear LOL. However the blueprint aircraft pictured is still an A320. And the top left is an A320neo.

Considering MAX 737 saga, I think C-1919 has fair chance

@abdiganiaden

Ай бұрын

You’re joking, majority of Comac parts are sourced from the west Only parts China makes is wings, fuselage, and radar cover Everything else is USA made

@christodang

Ай бұрын

Some of the parts of the current C919 are made by Airbus and Boeing suppliers soooo. Mind you China wants to have most of the parts made within China in the near future

@phoreal22

Ай бұрын

America is going to stifle competition by pressuring FAA to not provide "airworthiness"

@peterkotara

Ай бұрын

Comac will likely struggle to get a foothold in the western market as airlines are risk averse and Comac does not have an established parts and support network, the companies QC procedures are opaque, Chinas aviation industry has an appalling reputation for poor reliability and the C919 is overweight so unlikely to get close to the fuel efficiency of the western product. They will improve and will do well in China and some developing nations (a huge and growing market), but I don't see them cracking the western market any time soon (even accounting for the fact that there is a 7 year waiting list for some Airbus aircraft).

@leihtory7423

Ай бұрын

@@peterkotara USA EU buys Brazil's New Embraer E195. Why wont they buy Chinese. Same components made by Western Countries? Geopolitics?

Boeing is gonna break itself.

@user-wp8de6cc9s

28 күн бұрын

Not now, as long as our president Xi continues using 747-8i as his flying palace.

@toucancheney9091

27 күн бұрын

@@user-wp8de6cc9s Indeed CPC is now Boeing's last strew

It's 60% made in China. That's still impressive though, its very hard to make a modern airliner.

@abdiganiaden

Ай бұрын

They only make wings and fuselage, everything else is from USA and some from French, how is that 60%?

@damianodonnell5844

Ай бұрын

@@abdiganiaden they said 3/5 of the plane parts were made in china , 3/5 is equal to 60%

@zacksmith5963

Ай бұрын

​@@abdiganiaden they made me than that

@The_Stef

Ай бұрын

@@damianodonnell5844 I think you misunderstood the video. the video mentioned that 3/5th of all components come form the USA and 1/3 from Europe. This leaves only 10% of components coming from China or other countries. Plus the assembly of course.

@WellSalt-Studio

Ай бұрын

@@abdiganiaden No commercial airliner manufactures all the components of its own aircraft. Even if it has the ability to manufacture its own aircraft, it will choose to cooperate with multiple manufacturers due to cost factors. China has intercontinental large transport aircraft entirely manufactured by itself. In 2030, the localization rate of C919 will exceed 70%, which will be higher than the current value of Boeing. The C929 is a long-range wide-body jet airliner independently developed in accordance with internationally accepted airworthiness standards and with independent intellectual property rights. It is equipped with the self-developed Yangtze River 2000 engine, with a basic seating capacity of 280 and a range of 12,000 kilometers. Orders have exceeded 500.

Comac isn't in a hurry, they're looking up in the time frame of 2-4 decades to establish themselves in the international market. They'd easily get 2000+ orders from China and then smooth operations of those thousands of aircrafts can easily get them certification from anywhere. Comac don't need to beat Boeing or Airbus, establishing itself as a third biggest commercial aircraft maker would be a mega success for them and China.

@aslampervez2294

26 күн бұрын

They will beat them on the price

@nsebast

23 күн бұрын

If the safety records are established, pretty sure the whole world is going to buy from China again. Boeing and Airbus will majority only be purchased domestically.

Comac doesn’t need to sell internationally, they have enough business in China and maybe Russia.

@4:50 AIRBUS - A BOEING - B and COMAC - C 😂

@ogasdiaz

Ай бұрын

They are a were of their position and are working hard to become number 1. The same thing happened with byd

Airbus is making planes, Boeing is making flying coffin, how can they be a duopoly

@tommypaget2294

Ай бұрын

Airbus is copy cat, they also copy Boeing is Boeing is the true leader. Lat year 2 Airbus A320 crashed in Rusham due to poor pitot-static design. Airbus is truly a European trash.

@kamalabrahman6925

Ай бұрын

Wow, you have made your point correctly. I agree 1000 %%

@david50665

14 күн бұрын

so it is a monopoly now....that's why planes r so expensive

A lot of components on American planes are not from the United States so why y’all being hypocrites

Comec will fly in different countries in Asia, Russia, Africa and Middle eastern countries...

I would prefer COMAC to Boeing, definitely!

@steveablet4041

Ай бұрын

You would prefer something that is unknown versus known? Accidents are unfortunate but make aviation safer.

@fyc55

Ай бұрын

@@steveablet4041 You want to be Boeing's victim to make aviation safer? FAA certification is a joke!

@steveablet4041

Ай бұрын

@@fyc55 You take the same risk flying on ANY aircraft. Since you wrote your comment a day ago 10s of thousands of Boeing aircraft have taken off and landed safely. The recent incidents are unfortunate however those problems have been corrected. No Boeing aircraft are grounded at the moment by any international regulator. You are buying into the media hysteria.

@user-kd3pq3jt9v

10 күн бұрын

⁠@@steveablet4041you mean known danger and unknown danger? I would pick the unknown one.

Both Made in China commercial aircraft and commercial cruise ship need the time to grow and improve. Will certainly improve down the road.

that's exactly elon musk reaction a decade ago about BYD, now he bit his own tounge as BYD stole tesla's crown.

@widodoakrom3938

26 күн бұрын

True

More competition is great, especially in a market that has basically kept a duopoly going on for decades.

As long as doors don't fly off in mid-air.

US aviation certification is as useful as credit rating. Crash 737 & 2008 financial crisis.

@steveablet4041

Ай бұрын

the accidents are unfortunate but will make aviation safer. you're giving the media a high credit rating and buying into hysteria.

Of course, this will benefit Developing countries such as those in Southeast Asia. Never underestimate China

@jeremyknight1927

Ай бұрын

Never underestimate their ability to steal any proprietary data/designs.

@RoseRose-gk6ku

Ай бұрын

I'm with you. Just someone who is jealous & panic here.

@nerrailwaygorakhpur7173

Ай бұрын

​@@jeremyknight1927I only want to advice you to write some thing different man this arguments were don't work now ok? Go and try something different

@WellSalt-Studio

Ай бұрын

@@jeremyknight1927 When you have the ability to build a space station independently, it's not too late to brag. Dog barks at the train.

@coldham77

Ай бұрын

@@WellSalt-Studio China stole those designs to.

Thumbnails shows All 3 aircrafts are A320s. Then I checked, it’s from CNBC. Ahh. Right.

@Artemie-np3qu

Ай бұрын

Are you blind

@AloysiusTSY

29 күн бұрын

@@Artemie-np3qu Mr Windows 1.0 was slow to the game. They changed it before you came replying here.

We just need to understand that price which Comac can offer will be lower than both Airbus and Boeing. So if this place become successful in international market, both Airbus and Boeing will have buyer only in Europe and USA only because rest of the world do not have problem with Chinese products.

@merrick6484

21 күн бұрын

Comac will started with cargo plane first to build up reputation and experience.

Reliability and pricing will decide.

I don't really think Boeing earned the right to comment on the C919... They should focus on their own problems.

Most budget airlines from South East Asia are still rely on Airbus & Boeing fleet. For Comac flight become viable is to lease the aircraft to regional operators to minimize the cost & maintenance issues. By the time matures, confidenence will grow & order will increase eventually.

comac will naturally replace boeing, and eventually airbus by having crazy competitive prices. China doesn't play to compete, it dominates

@jetli740

13 күн бұрын

name 1 company that choose compete over dominates. every company want to dominates their market

The sister aircraft, the ARJ21 saw its first delivery in 2015 and now, almost 10 years later, annual production looks to be around 24-36 craft/year. I have never built a civilian aircraft myself, but it is probably not an easy thing to do.

@tren133

24 күн бұрын

ARJ's market is more limited though, and as China's first domestic airliner, not surprising that production rates have not been that high. On the other hand, its safety record after 9 years seems to be okay, and that's the one thing you need to get right in this sector. The day COMAC does get into a groove, and especially if/when local supply lines are all set up within China itself, then watch out because at that point they can and will crank production. Planes are the hardest things to be build, but China has achieved similar results now with trains, cars, and ships, and eventually they'll get there with planes as well.

Actually Comac is working with Airbus to compete Boeing.

For sure in the next 2 decades they are gonna be great. They will actually make them better after a few decades.

The more competition or choices the better

Better quality than Boeing

The more competition is always beneficial for the consumer

I really appreciate the cockpit graphic at 3:35. Very creative!

The funny thing is Comac doesnt even need to compete with Boeing or Airbus in International Market. Their Domestic market alone is THAT big. One of the perks of having 1.4 Billion people.

@MibomTali-cg9eo

19 күн бұрын

Not all Chinese airlines will take compact even if goverment enforce them

Comac doesn’t have to exceed Airbus or Boeing sales to have an impact on the market. Over a 1000 already ordered planes is already this very impact.

I'm surprised that Embraer hasn't pounced on this golden opportunity.

@alexandermathar7780

25 күн бұрын

Yes,they are perfectly capable of building B737 or Airbus sized aircraft !

Boing and Airbus responses are not any different from Nokia when it faced the critical question on digital camera!

Boeing will be just fine. They’ll learn from this and will continue to put out great product. I’m just as sure as that as I am of Comac growing over time.

@kamalabrahman6925

Ай бұрын

Boeeing will take few years to recover from public scare from their plane....

@TamPham-rv9qn

Ай бұрын

​@kamalabrahman6925 I agree, the fall of Boeing's quality for sure will be lesson and learn not only for Boeing but for Airbus and other as well.

I think for the first few years (closer to a decade probably), it will be only operated by Chinese airlines. This will slowly show other airlines that Comac is a viable alternative to Airbus and Boeing. This is probably worse for Boeing than Airbus since Comac could capitalise on the current controversies with Boeing.

@pedrorequio5515

28 күн бұрын

The West is not playing fair exactly. There is an area where China is impossible behind, Engine Technology, and the US is restricting access to modern engines. Copying these engines is easy, making the Materials that make them work is extraordinarily hard. Russia has better engine tech than China, but Russia will need scale because part availability is crucial for Airlines.

I’m expecting Comac to make RyanAir a deal they can’t refuse and soon RyanAir’s fleet will be 100% Comac and the camel’s nose will be completely in the tent.

I have no idea how the 737Max passed the inspection from the department of transportation.

@elotello

Ай бұрын

Money talks.

@HewbhurtGabon

29 күн бұрын

You have to trust american aviation authority. They are the world standard. 😂😂😂

@mostbestjia627

28 күн бұрын

Let me tell you why: Boeing moved their headquarter from Seattle to Chicago and finally to DC

@milibibi2152

25 күн бұрын

Corruption

6:36 The majority of airliners built use components from companies around the globe. The 787 is still American despite having components from Canada, France, Japan, the Uk, etc. The F-35 is still American despite being built and developed by a consortium of countries. the MC-21 is still Russian despite using parts and components from China, the EU, and the US (well, it did, before sanctions from the war changed that).

EU & USA certification is creating a room for monopoly however the locals can use it as long as it can be received to whatever country’s air space it can host

No, it will just become Airbus-whatever that chinese name is Duopoly. I get chills, when i get my boarding card and it says Boeing and I am normal.

COMAC will defiantly brake the duopoly of Airbus & Boeing and acquire a decent space in airline industry very soon 😊

boering is under insanely quality problem... folks take care

The more competion is involved the more consumers are assured with quality. Well done comac.

What wasn't mentioned is the earlier collaboration with Russia's UAC. They could have used UAC's own developed PD-14 engines but I think they mutually stopped the collaboration because of the anticipated sanction issue. So now UAC is continuing their Irkut MC-21 (200/300/310) domestically to be ready in 2025/6. Russia's older planes will need the MC-21 for replacement (TU-134, TU-154, TU-204 and YAK-42).

I have experienced flying with comac, very smooth and even faster to reach destination

Comac=Airbus>>Boeing

This plane will become security threat to americans

@widodoakrom3938

26 күн бұрын

Lol true

@obinnaezealah2465

22 күн бұрын

Or they'll say "safety concerns".

@carloschin4363

16 күн бұрын

​@@widodoakrom3938 usando a velha receita dos políticos do US ,com termos subestimando a potencialidade do concorrente e esquecendo o desenvolvimento interno do próprio país, perante a precariedade da infraestrutura da nação para o bem estar do povo com sintomas reais de declínio de dominância mundial... " American first" 😂 Veja as autoridades ,cabeções americanas e europeias visitando a China..por qual motivo??

Remember Elon's derisive laughter after hearing about BYD being competitive!

The foreign certificates are more depending on politics. It is sad.

this is actually not the first large jetliner China build. the SAMF Y10 flew in 1980, could carry 124 to 178 passenger, made 130 flight before it was retire in favor of buying Boeing. the reality is companies can't produce plane fast enough to meet orders, so it is very logical for airlines to just buy which ever plane would be available quickest than to wait for years for their planes. so the real question is how many planes can COMAC build a year, if the numbers are not comparible, people won't buy it, but if it is equal to Airbus and Boeing, than the duopoly will automatically be broken by the reality of production.

The Chinese market is more than enough for c 919!

The difference between a Boeing/Airbus having Chinese sourcing versus Comac having non-Chinese elements is the former opt for Chinese due to price and other considerations while the latter opts for them as it’s the only available source

Well the question is how many parts and then I mean all the little parts as well come for the US and Europe for it to function. For it to be a fully home grown Chinese plane.

As if the FAA certificate has any worth. Look at Boeing, it is like that, and there you have it.

Still needs to beat Embraer first

Attleast they are not falling apart like Beoings lol.

It's funny that the three Competitors are using the same engine(A320neo uses leap-1A while B737max uses leap-1B and C-919 uses leap-1C).

The narrator of this video doesn't seem qualified. She doesn't know much about the aviation industry and she seems wildly biased.

@tiago.matias

Ай бұрын

Doesn’t even know how to say A320

I'm curious what airline in Germany was interested in the C919?

@blazingstar9638

Ай бұрын

Hopefully none lol

@georgelan9985

Ай бұрын

The A320neo is better than the C919, and the C919 does not have an EASA certificate at this time. So, the C919 is mainly sold in the Chinese domestic market.

They're safer than Boeing.

At 1:40 her face, what did this guy do to her before the interview...? :')

A = Airbus B = Boeing C = Comac D= What a coincidence😮

@jamesmiller4114

25 күн бұрын

D = Douglas, E = Embraer

Well Boeing is certainly doing their part to give the Chinese firm an opening! At this rate, the Chinese plane would be safer than Boeing!

Not anytime soon. But on 15-20 years, maybe.

Yes you can see that 90% of this aicraft this not chinese but this just the beginning

@zacksmith5963

Ай бұрын

Nope .

@JigilJigil

Ай бұрын

beginning! China has spent 3 decades and over $100 billion to make its own domestic airliner and failed...

@zacksmith5963

Ай бұрын

@@JigilJigil and still they made it Didn't u run away from byd claim lol

@zacksmith5963

Ай бұрын

@@JigilJigil source ? Proof.

@JigilJigil

Ай бұрын

@@zacksmith5963 No they couldn't, eventually the West made them one, as it was stated in the video 70-80% of the parts come from US and Europe. BYD,! there are numerous reports/articles about the quality of BYD vehicles , WSJ had a priece about BYD EVs quality issues a fews days ago.

Probably safer than Boeing right now

FAA is a national joke 😂😂

The airbus and boeing guys are trying to make us believe it will take china ages te be Ready which is ofcourse funny and they giving al lot of reasons which they think will stand in the way, they clearly haven't learned that when china want something at a certain time I will het whatever it takes.

@choikof9725

25 күн бұрын

@@Rihno377 just wait and see. ;)

Anything would be safer than Boeing!

Didn't US and EU authorities ceritfy all those 737s? I wonder what tells about those authorities.

Wll become "Triopoly" in aircraft company?

@widodoakrom3938

26 күн бұрын

Most likely yes

If it is not Boeing, I am not going 😊

@Tpavra

Ай бұрын

Cool, more room for us normal people to travel 😎

@seanhsieh4149

Ай бұрын

@Tpavra lol, but the availability of airbus is limited , and it is hard to book a ticket 🎟 now.

@birdsnature6421

Ай бұрын

same, I would rather be taking an aircraft without a door than taking airbus or comic

@seanhsieh4149

Ай бұрын

@@birdsnature6421 without landing gear as well 😎how exciting!

Will it improve the atmosphere by not contributing carbon footprint?

Sad about what happened to Irkut MC21 though🙁 Best of luck to Comac✌️

To be honest I think now Comac is safer than Boeing

They probably do a better job than Boeing

These planes are far safer than Boeing made planes.

It comes down to quality. We shall see.

The engine option is old, and does not have efficiency of the leap engines on airbus and Boeing aircraft

Still, Chinese 🇨🇳 Xi Jinpig uses Boeing. -Emirates 🇦🇪, the world's leading airline uses 133 boeing 777s with orders for 205 777s and 35 787s. -Ryanair 🇮🇪, one of the leading european low cost airlines uses 547 boeing 737s, with no major incidents with orders for another 224. -Southwest 🇺🇸, uses 817 boeing 737's with orders for 495 more. No comac, in fact comac *isn't even certified* to fly in many regions and even Embraer, a Brazilian 🇧🇷 manufacturer has had more orders and deliveries for their jets. Lol

@johnsoncao3114

29 күн бұрын

Yes, it’s not a secret. Same like Chinese mobile phones industry, there is no Chinese brands at first, technology needs time. There is no need to shame. Start is better than nothing 😂

@Ttui89.

29 күн бұрын

@@johnsoncao3114 you can't compare mobile phones to airplanes

@OiOiSillyBoi

27 күн бұрын

Comac isn’t going to break into the market anytime soon; it’s not even certified nor does it have the credibility of a long history. For the record, Airbus is the biggest manufacturer in the world. More airbus aircraft fly worldwide than Boeing aircraft. United Airlines has heavily adopted airbus since Boeing’s mishaps.

@johnsoncao3114

27 күн бұрын

​@@Ttui89. Yes, sure they are not the same level in complexity. What I mean, you can achieve.

@widodoakrom3938

26 күн бұрын

Source: trust me bro

Both Reliability & build quality of Chinese products are way better than American products such as cars etc. I definitely will take comac over Boeing every single time