The possibility of this alternate history hurts my soul.

@lostintranslation_

2 ай бұрын

same fren, same

@user-pt5xc1pp4z

Ай бұрын

"Well at least you're not speaking German." I rather speak German, Than Arabic.

@user-pt5xc1pp4z

Ай бұрын

@@lostintranslation_ We can try again, Heck, We can do it ourselves, The past may be written, but the future isn't.

@lostintranslation_

Ай бұрын

@@user-pt5xc1pp4z He never planned for us to speak german. We're really close from being coocked honestly.

@user-pt5xc1pp4z

Ай бұрын

@@unknownuser9424 So your solution is capitulation?

If only all of our countries would have helped defeat the special people!

@silverbullet2008bb

Ай бұрын

Our countries were controlled by the special people.

@floycewhite6991

Ай бұрын

They always ask for special treatment, and finally got it.

@TheNVSK

Ай бұрын

@EnlightenedOne00 Hegelian Dialect

@user-uy8wx4pk4h

14 күн бұрын

@EnlightenedOne00 Because Stalin partially purged them before the war and was gearing up to go after them after the war. They killed Stalin and fled to America where they became neocons because the Soviets were aligned with the Arabs against Israel, and the Democrats were going soft on the cold war so they pivoted to taking over the Republicans and purged all the true conservatives so they could mutate conservatism into a zionist + free trade & international capitalist party. So much for your stupid gotcha comment

@concernedparent84

11 күн бұрын

@EnlightenedOne00 there was a right wing reaction in the US in the 50s, also Stalin turned on them and Israel

I’m so glad you are making these videos my guy, the majority of people have never even heard of the holomodor, the world needs to know the truth 👏 keep up the good work!

@ZoomerHistorian

11 ай бұрын

Thank you very much, appreciate it more than you can imagine!

@dinarichyperborean1455

11 ай бұрын

Because it never happened and is literally just a lie made by the (((press))) like the Holobunga (notice the similar sounding names)

@Synaptic_gap

6 ай бұрын

I couldn't agree more! As WW2 has receded further and further from the present, fewer and fewer people seem to grasp (or have an interest) the staggering implications of what occurred in the world during the first 50 years of the 20th century. This is especially ironic in that, with the advent of the internet, historical information, while not necessarily accurate, has never been more accessible.

@zeeski7454

2 ай бұрын

For as disturbing as the holodomar was what really gets me is how the USA recognized the ussr at that time and still till this day the US refuses to acknowledge the holodomar.

@BwanaFinklestein

2 ай бұрын

People in the West - especially the US - are ignorant of the Holodomor... why? Because it was perpetrated by the Bolsheviks. Who made up most of the leadership of the Bolsheviks? One guess? That's correct... our Ashkenazi friends. Now... who controls the US Congress? Right again... our Ashkenazi immigrants. If Americans realized that what the Juice did to the Ukrainians is many times worse than anything done to them... well, their victim card would be a duece.

In Belgium more than 10.000 people lost their lives in the allied bombardements end 1943 and spring 1944 -- all bigger cities were damaged !!! There are now 80 years later commemories going on, but most of our people don' t even realise that this was not done by the Germans -- the history of after world war 2 has been completely invertted

watch europa the last battle part 1 if u want to know about the soviet union and the birth of communism

@_Arugula_Salad_

2 ай бұрын

Right, this completely ignores the fact that the Germans had no choice but to launch a preemptive strike before the Soviets did in July 41

@joeywheelerii9136

2 ай бұрын

​@@_Arugula_Salad_While I agree that the Soviets would have attacked eventually I disagree with the Suvorov theory that they would have made their move in July. A large part of the Soviet military was not ready. They only had like 10% of the trucks they were supposed to have for their mechanized units. A large chunk of their vaunted tank armada were in need of repair and overhaul. Also they needed to bide their time to recover from the purges. Many of the officers leading large units should have been platoon or company commanders. Summer 42 or even Summer 43.

@delko624

2 ай бұрын

That thing is literally a neonazi propaganda, its makers are neo nazis

@juri8723

2 ай бұрын

@@_Arugula_Salad_Boris Mikhailovich Shapovnikov set Day M. Joseph Dshugashvili Stalin set Day D. That day was June 27, 1941. We escaped total annihilation by a few days. Read what moustache man said on 22 June in the Führerdirektive.

@purplehaze1274

2 ай бұрын

Even by fanatical anti semitic standards that documentary is incredibly stupid and filled with nonsense.

Imagine if German diplomats gave each Eastern European state a direct offer for independence and a rough vision for after the war, and imagine if they gave them more autonomy to raise their own armies etc. It would have generated much more support, and an overall goal and vision for the future should have been established early. The old saying “a soldier doesn’t fight because he hates what’s in front of him, but because he loves whats behind him” applies strongly here. Germany was seen as more of an occupying force than a liberating one, if an atmosphere of mutual cooperation was created rather than German iron fisted grip there would have been much more passionate local support.

@ZoomerHistorian

Жыл бұрын

100%, the welcoming attitude of viewing them as liberators quickly melted away when no promises were given for their future, ridiculous policy when there was so much potential there

@rhysnichols8608

Жыл бұрын

@@ZoomerHistorian Yeah, plus the SS machine gunning enemies of the state in pits is bad optics. The Germans treated many as an occupied enemy rather than an ally, huge oversight

@aclown36

Жыл бұрын

It turns out genociding the slavs would turn slavs against you.. Who woulda thought

@totallynotatree8718

2 ай бұрын

​@@rhysnichols8608these Eastern slavs would have seen what happened in Poland and in Germany itself and never have accepted this.

@trhtkify

2 ай бұрын

with all the portrayals here about the germans being the liberators from communism, you have to wonder why indeed they didnt just recruit the people who were liberated, maybe because the ideological gap between them was too wide and a common enemy was not enough to bridge the fact that the germans at the time viewed them as inferior, im 100% sure my self it just interesting

The mistake that cost Germany the war was when The british were allowed to leave at Dunkirk.

Good video as always. I partly agree. While this may have increased manpower and lessened the need to garrison the east, the main problem with the army was the logistics and oil. Hitler could send as many tanks and men as he wanted, however there was poor logistics to supply these men and little oil to supply those tanks. I don't really think Hitler made a crucial mistake in the war, I just think it would have been extremely hard to conquer Russia and especially the caucuses region (oil for fuel) considering the vast allied lend lease flooding into Russia. If it was purely an Axis vs Soviet war, it is most likely Russia would have collapsed. Their food supplies would have been completely distinguished by the time of the occupation of Eastern Europe and parts of Russia. Back to the topic though, I think increasing support in Eastern Europe would have helped stop communist insurgents from damaging railways logistics and military bases that would have definitely helped Hitler in his crusade against Bolshevism.

@ZoomerHistorian

Жыл бұрын

Yeah I agree with all of that, my line of thinking regarding the extra manpower was that presumably that would've been able to or at least made a very good go of getting to the oil in the caucasus, if you can't supply the men that obviously it would've been useless anyway!

@Synaptic_gap

6 ай бұрын

While I completely agree with much of what you had to say here, I think that no amount of manpower could have made up for the tactical errors attributable to Hitlers megalomaniacal meddling in military decisions beginning in mid to late July 1941. His paranoid distrust of his military leaders coupled with his grandiose belief in his own infallibility pretty much guaranteed the chaotic collapse of the Third Reich. @@ZoomerHistorian

@JohnSmith-zx7pq

2 ай бұрын

I would agree it is a historical fact that Hitler did not use his allies to the fullest potential for the countries willing to offer aid ...

@ILoveDIEversity

2 ай бұрын

​@@JohnSmith-zx7pq Should have gone balls to the wall . All chips in. Release the sarrin gas ! I would have anhilated everything and anything , but that's me a modern man seeing the stinking shithole we inhabit. I knew they said things will be bad Should they lose, but it is bad . Very bad and getting worse by the year as basic fundamentals are torn asunder. Clap for the man with the hairy breasts wearing a dress. Consume soy. White people don't exist. But they are also evil and responsible for everything. Also hail Israel defenders of judeo Christian values (but literally spit on Christians in the street )

@juliantheapostate8295

2 ай бұрын

@@JohnSmith-zx7pq He lacked the logistics to arm them properly

Love your work , thank you . From Ireland .

@ChauncyFatsack

2 ай бұрын

another country that knows what fighting for freedom and independence is all about!

@MegrelMamba

15 күн бұрын

May Northern Ireland re-unite with Ireland.

I feel like the reason Germany lost the war may have been Lend Lease. The U.S. and Britain gave tons and tons and tons of aid to the Soviet Union, and according to Khrushchev, even Stalin thought the USSR would not be able to survive without it (Khrushchev agreed). Many Russian historians also agree with this take, but I haven't taken a look at a real statistical analysis of how much aid was sent and what kind of difference it made.

@ZoomerHistorian

11 ай бұрын

A good book on this is Stalin’s war and I totally agree with you. Chances are no lend lease = Soviet defeat! I’ll make a full video one day

@gumdeo

2 ай бұрын

General Zhukov also agreed, lend-lease made a huge difference.

@PassionateSpirit88

2 ай бұрын

True. '"If the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war," [Nikita Khrushchev] wrote in his memoirs. "One-on-one against Hitler's Germany, we would not have withstood its onslaught and would have lost the war. No one talks about this officially, and Stalin never, I think, left any written traces of his opinion, but I can say that he expressed this view several times in conversations with me."...

@robbiatbarracks

2 ай бұрын

The massive bombing campaign didn't help either

@Gabsboy123

2 ай бұрын

I honestly feel that the outcome of the war (and indeed the rest of the 20th Century) was already sealed by the existence of the USA's vast industrial capability. America would have survived the 1940s unscathed no matter who won in Europe-and the major determinant of the outcome of the war would be which side the US takes.

"The Russians, that is, the Ukrainians and the people from the Caucasus, volunteered to fight, but we were not in a position to take advantage of this. We didn't have enough weapons. In war, there is a lot that ideally should be done, but we simply couldn't do it. The Arabs also wanted weapons from us so that they could liberate themselves. And the Spanish leader Franco also wanted weapons as a condition for entering the war, but we simply didn't have enough ourselves. The German armaments program did not really get going until after the war against the Soviets was underway. We started with 3,260 tanks. That's all we had, but the Soviets had 10,000. At that time our monthly production was 35 tanks. Imagine that! It wasn't until October 1944 that we reached the high point of our production of 1,000 tanks per month. So, our monthly production of tanks went from 35 in 1941 to 1,000 in late 1944. That's quite a difference, and it's proof that we were simply not militarily prepared for a world war." - Otto Ernst Remer.

Hitler’s hatred of Slavs never made sense to me. Did he not realize who was behind the Bolshevik revolution? One of his many mistakes.

@oglocbaby520

2 ай бұрын

There's a lot that goes into this answer. The simple answer is that Hitler and the Nazis believed in the concept of Lebensraum, living space. Hitler and the Nazis knew that Germany was not fully economically self sufficient, food and even oil and other materials and goods had to be imported. This is a lesson that they learned during the first world war, where the Royal Navy had totally blockaded Germany and they suffered immensely. Learning from this mistake, they knew that Germany would always be playing with a weak hand. Eastern Europe was the solution to this and the peoples that lived there were in the way. Ukraine was and still is the breadbasket of Europe and today the world. Germany today and even then imported massive amounts of oil from Russia/the Soviet Union. This was a big part of it, but there were also many racial ideologies that were quite common at the time. Anti semitism and seeing slavs as lesser were not unique to Hitler, you'll even find these sentiments were very much the norm with Americans, British and other Europeans. The non aggression pact Germany and the Soviet Union signed in 1939 was agreeing to a sphere of influence in eastern Europe but also a huge trade deal. After the invasion of Poland by Germany and later the Soviets, the French and British actually considered bombing the oil fields in the Caucasus. There's way more that goes into this. Stalin actually approached the Nazis with the idea of joining the axis, to which they actually had talks in 1940. However, Stalin made demands and showed interests that were counter to Germany's interests and Hitler knew that it would not work out between the two nations and that war was inevitable.

@mightisright

2 ай бұрын

He held many common stereotypes about peoples of the world at the time, most of which were correct. He underestimated the Slavs, though. I believe he was also fed lies about the Germans being hailed as heroes by the oppressed Soviet masses. A lie we've seen told in so many conflicts since.

@oglocbaby520

2 ай бұрын

@@mightisrightExactly, even Patton said a lot of the same things about the slavs/Russians calling them Mongolian savages and things like that.

@djaltam1986

Ай бұрын

Juices, like always.

@FantadiRienzo

Ай бұрын

He was allied with Poland until about 1938, he wanted an alliance with Yugoslavia, later he allied with Croatia, Slovakia and Bulgaria. And the only thing most people know about Czechia is that Heydrich was assassinated there. I know all the mental gymnastics, and I know repetition is more important than convincing - just stating some facts.

I appreciate your unique perspectives on history we aren’t always taught about (or even shamed for considering). You gained a new subscriber

There are a couple of things that really need to be mentioned in order for this video to be more complete: 1) Around 3.5 million Germans and 750.000 non-German Axis troops were involved in Operation Barbarossa, which was and remained the greatest invasion force in history. To call the logistical problems it created a nightmare would be a great understatement. While Germany had managed to become independent in terms of food due to AH's policies, ensuring that a second WW1-style British blockade would never be effective and kill millions by starvation, it's also true that resources were already strained at the start of the war, not just in terms of food, but also arms and war material. The Germans captured a staggering 5.5 million Soviet POWs; in Kiev alone they captured 700.000 Soviets, the biggest encirclement and surrender in history. It was logistically absolutely impossible to provide sustenance to even half of them, which is why many died, while others worked in camps under increasingly bad conditions, due to the bombing war putting even more strain on resources. 2) As you mentioned, Rosenberg was only one of the voices next to Hitler's ear in terms of what to do with the Soviet population, but he did not hold any real power in terms of policy. Other men found themselves leading the Reichskommissariats (Which were units of temporary military administration and NOT a plan for what to do with Soviet lands after the war as many seem to believe. The simple truth is there simple was no plan, because H, and rightly so, was 100% dedicated to winning the war itself and had stopped paying attention to even domestic German matters; making people like Martin Bormann the de facto dictator of Germany, while Hitler was the dictator of the war effort. Hitler correctly predicted that 1941 was the last year that Germany and its European allies would have any sort of material and strategic superiority over their enemies, and that if anything was to be won, it had to be won then. He was forced to end the war with the West by going through Moscow in order to secure his flank. Another fact that needs to be mentioned is that H and his staff were convinced the Soviets were primed to attack the rest of Europe. Many do not believe that Stalin was planning to attack Germany and the rest of Europe, but this belief is immaterial, the only thing that matters is what H believed at the time, and I think he was right, but that's another question altogether. 3) As the war turned for the worse Hitler did open up to the idea of using Soviet citizens in the Wehrmacht, not just as logistical personnel but also combat troops; these men were the "Hiwis" (Hilfswilliger) of the Eastern Front, and in total there were about one million of them. While the Hiwis do not represent even a drop in the ocean of Soviet manpower that could've been used for the Wehrmacht, we must always keep in mind that suddenly inflating your army with even 100.000, let alone a million or two or 5.7 million men would simply collapse your logistics. There weren't enough guns to go around, not enough ammunition and not enough food. I think H's ultimate mistake wasn't to not recruit more Soviet citizens and POWs, but that he ignored the bad treatment of the civilian population by men like Erich Koch. The Germans were welcomed as liberators by the Ukrainians and the Russians, but men like Koch absolutely destroyed this pro-Axis enthusiasm and was the catalyst that lead to so many resistance fighters making things even harder for the Wehrmacht behind the lines. If somebody like Rosenberg was in charge of the policy in occupied territories then I believe that Germany's chances would've been better.

@gloglogloyper7888

4 ай бұрын

Excellent insight, thank you!

@qwertyasdfgh1014

2 ай бұрын

German propaganda that they were welcomed as "liberators"... .Especially when talking about "Ukraine". Which "Ukraine"?! Soviet and you despise the Soviets so much. The absurd idea that the Russians wanted the Germans to dismember their country and make them a colony because "that's how they would get rid of the Soviets".

@LiftOffLife

2 ай бұрын

No mention of oil?

@robbiatbarracks

2 ай бұрын

Stalin said that the war in the East was won with oil,so I read,excellent take on the situation on the OST Front, one that I had not considered in all these decades of study, Logistics for the new volunteers, food and water mainly as many arms could and were captured from the enemy,the mistake of splitting forces for Stalingrad ,H should have concentrated on the oil fields first but split spear heads Operation Edelweiss, named after the mountain flower, was a German plan to gain control over the Caucasus and capture the oil fields of Baku on the Eastern Front of World War 2.

@user-ox7xr8nu4t

2 ай бұрын

Excellent review.

A history correction. The revolution in 1917 was a Juice revolution, not a Russian revolution. Why haven't you heard of Genrikh Yagoda?

@FantasyVisuals

Ай бұрын

F the vile Juice . Historys biggest poisoners. Research the black death. Metal poisoning .

@WhiteBaronn

Ай бұрын

Exactly. Only 30 out of almost 500 Bolsheviks were Russians. And the rest...

@DavidBarton777

Ай бұрын

I think you mean jew You can't even type jew How are we going to win when people like you are scared to type the word jew🤔

Very informative video thanks!

@ZoomerHistorian

Жыл бұрын

No problem Daniela.

You are to be commended for giving an objective assessment of the subject.While Hitler has been unfairly made to be a villian by history, he did make mistakes.

@Conker117

29 күн бұрын

You have a misguided view of history then. You “see the light” but you’re under propaganda at the moment. This guy is a neo-nazi and you probably are too from what I read

In the end, Quality was overwhelmed by Quantity.

@user-pi3sm4mu9i

2 ай бұрын

😂the most common myth about the numerical superiority of Russians and their small numbers but quality Germans.

@theforgot3n1

Ай бұрын

That's a myth.

@zupnanazwa

Ай бұрын

Sudenly all the germans were equal when they felt bulletts in their heads

@ndingounou5380

Ай бұрын

Isnt the kd ratio in Germany's favor?​@@user-pi3sm4mu9i

@floycewhite6991

Ай бұрын

@@ndingounou5380 Began at 10-1 and ended slightly unfavorable.

Can´t give you enough praise for just getting to the point, no tedious long intro and using meanlingless fillers

Brilliant video. Albeit 2 suggestions: 1- any chance you could show down your pace when talking? There's too much amazing informations to integrate so quickly. Also, when watching other channels and famous podcast, I notice they all have a very slow speaking pace. It helps to integrate what they say, and also helps foreigners like me. 2- any chance to get a video on the lease-lend agreement between the USA and the Soviet Union? The book "Stalin's War" and Stalin himself, acknowledged that without it the Soviets could never have won against the German army they faced, and that's regardless of extra man power this video interestingly developed and is a very valid point indeed. Many thanks for your amazing work!

@ZoomerHistorian

2 ай бұрын

1. Yeah I fix it in later videos 2. Yeah I will make a lend lease video eventually Thanks for watching!

@alflat885

2 ай бұрын

​@@ZoomerHistorianamazing, I'm impressed by your super quick response! Your work is truly amazing and inspiring. MANY THANKS TRULY!! 🙏

@ZoomerHistorian

2 ай бұрын

@@alflat885 No problem!

@alflat885

2 ай бұрын

@@ZoomerHistorian PS: while I've luckily got you there, what is the best way to support you, there's so many options, but basically, which plateform takes the less % and gives you most of donations ? (I've heard it was Pat re on, is that correct?)

@nicerides9224

2 ай бұрын

You can slow down or speed up videos yourself. There's an option on youtube to do that.

I do not think the logistical system would have allowed Hitler to support the additional forces even if they had been recruited. They needed someone to supply them with a huge number of all wheel drive trucks with spare parts, fuel and oil. They also needed to get the railroad system running on the correct gauge and protect it from partisans.

@KevinBalch-dt8ot

Ай бұрын

Recruiting more from the Red Army would have negated some of the materiel advantages the Soviets had. Weapons aren’t any good if there aren’t enough soldiers to use them.

Watched a mark Felton thing on this, apparently, towards the end they had around 900k Russian volunteers But AH was slow to arm them due to mistrust

@ZoomerHistorian

10 ай бұрын

Yeah the army was pretty big, I don’t blame him for mistrusting them though, obviously quite a gamble

@morgs456

10 ай бұрын

@@ZoomerHistorian true

@gumdeo

2 ай бұрын

Apparently at Stalingrad, about one quarter of the Axis forces were made up of Soviet citizens.

@FantadiRienzo

Ай бұрын

They couldn't even adequately equip their own army. At the end of the war, even ordinary infantrymen had to fire ammunition with steel cases and iron-core projectiles because there was a shortage of even non-ferrous metals, including lead.

The germans though that the Soviets were their enemy, but were the British and the Americans who bomb their defenseless cities, to the ground, with all the all banned weapons possible. Grave mistake that cost the future’s nation.

@zmeizy

Ай бұрын

Watch this guy's video "the myth about lebenraum". Pretty much sums it up that the soviets were indeed enemies

@4570george

Ай бұрын

It's not one nation or another that was or is an enemy, no different to today. Neither Russia or the UK or the US were Germany's enemy. Germany's enemies were our enemies, the certain people who captured the control of these nations. These certain people are the small hats, their supporters and the brainwashed useful idiots. The situation is the same today. Russia has removed them, they still control the global banking system, the captured WEF, UN and other globalist organisations, they still control the US, the UK and their vassel states, much of this control today is from a certain country in the middle east that was stolen by this lot in 1948.

@zupnanazwa

Ай бұрын

​@@zmeizyNot inly the soviets, but slavs and other minorites that werent some kind of breeed from "Nordoc race" bs. Lebensraum wasnt a myth and was a true plan

@gammadion

Ай бұрын

It's not wrong to want land so your people can grow.

@zupnanazwa

Ай бұрын

@@gammadion Yes, good for the weak Germans that superior Soviets gave them land so their weak and lame nation could live once again

I once read an article that ask an ex- Russian propagandist on how to defeat Russia and he said get the Russians to do it. I guess it doesn't take much to kick off a civil war in Russia

@HisCoconutGun

2 ай бұрын

Unfortunately the Russian people have been oppressed for a very, _very_ long time compared to Western Europeans. Ironically in 2024, Putin is one of very few European leaders who actually cares about the fate of his people.

I love your channel, but I have a simple piece of advice: everything would be better understood if spoken a little more slowly and with small spaces between sentences.

@samnectar

Ай бұрын

Just play it on 0.75 speed

Really super video.Agreed the voice over needs to be paced out more.However Walter Schellenberg tells a different story which I tend to go with.

You are absolutely right, If the partisans had fought to overthrow the Soviets instead of the Germans the war would have ended very differently. All the German High Command had to do was enforce a no looting or pillaging policy and the Russians would have fought Stalin for the Germans. Thanks for your channel.

@theforgot3n1

Ай бұрын

Total nonsense. Partisan are also a myth, they had a limited impact on the war.

@floycewhite6991

Ай бұрын

@@theforgot3n1 Even the Italian and Romanian forces were poorly trained and ill-equipped.

This, and the lack of winter equipment. Also, H had the chance to go after the caucuses first, and collect much needed oil. But did that way too late.

@juliantheapostate8295

2 ай бұрын

They had lots of winter gear, they just didn't have enough rail and truck capacity to get it to the front line in addition to the food and ammo

Thank you for presenting an alternative view on history !

Your videos are awesome

I hadn't thought of that

You cant win a war like this without the majority of your country behind you.

Honestly, I would argue that Germany still had a chance to win, be it miniscule, had Case Blue succeeded, the war on the east would surely drop in intensity given that Germany manages to hold on. Then all Germany had to do was hold on.

@ZoomerHistorian

9 ай бұрын

Funny you say that, half of today’s video is on Case Blue, but yes I don’t disagree

Well put. And very right

You are doing Gods work. Thank you.

I figured it was the 2 weeks of dysentery he suffered in the peak of the offensive toward Stalingrad is what turned the tide in favor of the enemy. Supposedly he was out for about 14 days and in that time his Generals completely redrew the plans and moved around troops which completely bungled the entire offensive and Hitlers own attack plans and inevitably caused the encirclement of the German army in Stalingrad which is in fact the moment when the tide turned. That's my interpretation of what went wrong, based on Irvings work. Now one could speculate that this was either an unholy stroke of bad luck, or, if one is more conspiratorial; it was on purpose to sacrifice the lives of so many in order to please the reptilians feeding off of our suffering and intense negative emotions. It has been suggested that Napoleon did the same in his Russian campaign. I don't want to believe it, but I honestly don't see it as an impossibility. Who knows, really.

@theforgot3n1

Ай бұрын

You are going to place your belief on a myth as the answer to the war? There are far more rational answers.

@Daggz90

Ай бұрын

@@theforgot3n1 Read again. And before you start formulating a reply, read it one more time. And it's not a myth, it's a fact supported by the diary of Hitlers personal doctor. I'm "placing my belief" on the thousands of hours of research I've put into 19th and 20th century European history which I've spent the last 5 years on full time and 15 years part time. There's few if any other rational explanations that are supported by actual evidence. Irving spent +30 years on this alone, I don't think you are in a position to refute either of us. But you, like anyone else, is welcome to believe precisely what you want to. But I doubt that you have the same level of knowledge on the subject as most of us historians, do have.

they didn't need manpower they needed oil

What is this footage from?

I agree with your conclusions A missed opportunity

Other Real Reasons Why Germany Lost: (add more in the replies) - Hitler was too soft on Great Britain - Hitler should of forced the degenerates to become slaves - Produce less technologically advanced equipment for easier production and maintenance - Spain didn't join the war :(

@Anatolpinist

Жыл бұрын

Turkey should also have joined the war as Germany's ally expanding on the German-Turkish friendship pact.

@desolatortrooper7196

Жыл бұрын

Spain joining the war would make it harder for Germany

@VerrucktKertz

Жыл бұрын

@@desolatortrooper7196 How so?

@desolatortrooper7196

Жыл бұрын

@@VerrucktKertz because you have a country weakened from the civil war still busy fighting republican and separatist remnant. Spain didn't have the army nor the industry to help Germany in the war. Also spain joining the Axis will probably trigger Portugal to join the Allies (Portugal have huge ties with UK). Germany would have to invade Portugal because Spain won't be able to fight them alone and Germany can't let the Allies a bridge head in Europe. Invading Portugal won't be easy because of the terrains (Mostly hills and mountains) and while lot impossible it will divert troops and supplies much needed for the Eastern Front so even if they conquer Portugal Germany will most likely lost ground in the Soviet Union. In the case Spain join the Axis Gibraltar will most likely fell but it won't really change anything because most supplies where going around Africa to avoid the italian navy. Add to this all the coast line and territory Germany would have to protect against allies landing and partisans now supplied by the Allies and you are stretching Germany even more thin. Spain joining the Axis wouldn't ve benefict for Germany.

@pierren___

9 ай бұрын

- didnt integrate France in Axis

Hitler lost because he never played Risk 😂

4:54 in the background is that a Fegelein cameo? It looks like he has two arrows pointing at his iron cross. FEGELEIN!!!! FEGELEIN! FEGELEIN!

Bro, you nailed it. Yeah, if only Germany had a message to give to countries they liberated

@_Arugula_Salad_

2 ай бұрын

They did - peace and prosperity - you're just still unraveling from the brainwashing

This was Napoleon’s mistake too

@ZoomerHistorian

10 ай бұрын

I didn’t think of this, good point

@juliantheapostate8295

2 ай бұрын

No. Bonaparte brought a huge force of Poles along with him. By and large the Russian forces were loyal to their emperor and would not have defected

@MoloIongo

2 ай бұрын

He didn’t really have a choice though didn’t he?

@nkristianschmidt

2 ай бұрын

In Spain for sure

@StrugglerPilgrim

Ай бұрын

​​@@nkristianschmidt But weren't the Spaniards loyal to their emperor ? At least that wast the history that I learned at mainstream..

antisemitism in eastern europe did not begin with jewish commissars lol

@aguilarraliuga1777

2 ай бұрын

Your right, but it sure as hell made things worse

@EQOAnostalgia

2 ай бұрын

Nope, they had already ruined their rep in something like 149 other nations so...

@dungeonsanddragons2049

2 ай бұрын

it didnt because it already existed lmao

@ForestryService.

20 күн бұрын

I was thrown out from 109 bars for no reason

I can’t remember who said it, but one German said he knew the war was lost the moment the Wehrmacht hoisted the swastika over Kiev, rather than the Ukrainian national flag.

@MegrelMamba

15 күн бұрын

Kyiv...

@MyLateralThawts

15 күн бұрын

@@MegrelMamba I’m not one to pander to the latest thing. I still use Bombay, Peking and Constantinople when refering to some famous cities.

@MegrelMamba

15 күн бұрын

@@MyLateralThawts might as well refer to Russian towns in their Mongolic names...

@MyLateralThawts

15 күн бұрын

@@MegrelMamba I’m sure Mongols do, but I’m not a member of their nation.

@user-uy8wx4pk4h

14 күн бұрын

@@MegrelMamba Kiev

very very cool video!

@ZoomerHistorian

Жыл бұрын

Thanks brother, you should join the telegram if you have it

@wworldns6391

Жыл бұрын

@@ZoomerHistorian i have, what’s the name?

@ZoomerHistorian

Жыл бұрын

@@wworldns6391 it’s in the description

@wworldns6391

Жыл бұрын

@@ZoomerHistorian thank you

It was the alliance with Japan The Soviet issue required merely not loosing aka gain the nuke and cause a cease fire

Given what's been revealed about Hitler's rise to power, he was right to not trust his various staff... but that's political staff, not generals. Also, people forget to ask "Why?" and look beyond the most obvious reasons, instead of just looking at the most blatant assumptions.

What about not smashing the British at dunkirk?

@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044

27 күн бұрын

The German military was fairly exhausted locally fuel ammunition low and troops exhausted and the RAF was able to maintain air control to a greater extent

"Poor treatment for the conquered people" is such a soft way to say for the monstrosity he did. In case of my country Serbia (Yugoslavia) he leveled to the ground our cities, attacked us without war declaration because of a government overthrow organized by UK, impose shooting random civilians (50 for 1 wounded, and 100 for 1 killed German occupier). He robbed our country, did absolutely nothing to stop genocide of Serbians in Croatia by his puppet state NDH (almost 1 million killed in massacres and concentration camps, especially Jasenovac). And only Eastern Europeans had such treatment (Especially Poles, Serbs, Belorussians and Russians), Westerners were treated like royalty compared with us. As a reaction 2 resistance movements were created, communist Partisans and royalist Četniks, they hated each other but they hated German occupier even more. Nazis got what they deserved in the end.

@qwertyasdfgh1014

2 ай бұрын

100% true

@donvito3663

2 ай бұрын

NDH killing 1 million men is very exaggerated by tito

@sleepenjoyer-on2dr

2 ай бұрын

Don't even bother arguing with the guy. He thinks the Nazis were the misunderstood heroes after all.

@TheoHawk316

2 ай бұрын

You speak too much truth to this socialist apologist.

@razvanandreiantonescurogoz4236

2 ай бұрын

@yudzin: You are right, neighbour. From Romania.

He could of lied to them,one of his biggest mistakes not tapping into this manpower source

It's a nice fantasy but there is a long, long list of things that needed to be different in order for Hitler to win the war. Just "being nicer" to the Russians would have been like Thing #26 on that list, not even top 3 or top 10.

@idonuttylikezenorship4547

2 күн бұрын

Get more read up before you pop off "The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution" (see David R. Francis', " Russia from the American Embassy, April, 1916-November, 1918 " The U.S was the first to formally recognize the USSR at the height of holodomor in 1933. White star. Red star.

as a malaysian chinese that realize the truth after i watched adolf hitler the greatest story never told by dennis wise,i also need to add italy,japan and china also contributed to germany's defeat in world war two.first let's talk about italy's role that contributed to germany's defeat in world war two where benito mussolini's ambitions of turning italy into another roman empire by launching unneccesary offensive into the balkans and north africa with ill prepared italian forces caused germany need to bail italy out of the mess italy created and caused germany to divert resources into the balkans,mediterranian and north africa that could've been use for eastern front and delayed operation barbarossa for two month and two weeks.next is how japan and china also indirectly caused germany's defeat in world war two where there are chinese revisionist said soviet union was the cheif culprit of the second sino japanese war where soviet union ordered japanese communist party and chinese communist party to provoke a war between china and japan to prevent soviet union from facing a two front war,germany on the west and japan and probably china on the east

To place AH☠️ into the realm of 'reason' is the height of absurdity. The record shows that even during the Battle of Stalingrad German forces were effectively aided by Russian deserters and HE wouldn't be swayed. He NEVER gave the 'Vaslovites' one bit of consideration. Had the assassination attempt in April 1943 been successful the Wehrmacht had an excellent chance of forcing an armistice using a Russian-Ukranian alliance. Still. Probably not. The 'die was cast'. In the end the problem post 1944 STILL exists to this very day.. 💀🇷🇺💥🇺🇦

There are 2 very important things to note when it comes to this but also policy in general. No state first of all truly has one vision as no state has truly ever had one authoritive person that had support from the entire system for his exact vision. What i mean by this is that even an authoritarian regime like the third reich still has many other powerful men besides AH that have their own ideas and put them forth. Your example of the netherlands is a good one as some in germany wanted a germanic reich where all peoples descending from the proto germanics would unite into a single reich. This vision was also shared by various politicians of other non german nations. Im dutch myself and you made the example of mussert. His party the NSB basically had 2 major factions. The pro Diets (low countries nationalism basically, they wanted their own place as Dietsland in a future german led europe) and the ones that wanted to become part of a great germanic reich. Mussert was a pro diets one. He was the leader of the movement and therefore not trusted as much by the germans because at the end of the day he cared more about dietsland then what would happen to germany even if he was a big fan of the new germany. So just like in my country you obviously have the exact same situation in the east. There indeed wasn't a clear policy. Many plans and ideas have floated around but none had offically been adapted. But there is also a danger in massively arming your former enemies. The chances of infiltration if Rosenberg indeed got his wish would've been great. The dangers very large.that being said lots of russians still did fight for germany. Hundreds of thousands were involved militarily in some capactity be that in combat roles or non combat roles and millions were still sympathic or collaborated with the axis forces. But actually arming them on mass and organising that well while minimising the risk of them turning on you is an almost impossible task even if germany would've gone full in on the liberation mode. War is a tricky thing between nations. You can see this very well in the ns scene in ukraine and russia today. Most oppose having to fight their brothers. But many still do even though both governments don't represent their ideals. Some because they dont want to see their country become smaller, some pan slavics might support russia because it gets them closer to their vision even though they dont support the current leadership, some are fully anti war and refuse to participate in a brother war. Some russians decide to fight for ukraine. Just look at the russian volunteer corps which is filled with russian ns and thrid positionists that support ukraine because russia is the aggressor of the brother war. It's all over the place. Same would go for this scenarion in ww2. Lots of russian anti communist nationalists would still feel salty over germany being at war with "their people" while others would rejoice. The sheer vastness of the soviet union woud make it impossible to truly effectively run such a massive volunteer effort without the many previously mentioned risks.

I would say the biggest mistake of Hitler was to let the British escape at Dunkirk.

Excellent subject and presentation except for the fast paced narration. Not a breath drawn between sentences. Why the rush?.

Dr. Matthew Rafael Johnson has some good stuff on this topic.

Honestly, I think Germany should've just told the former Soviet states that they'd be taking a whole swathe of agricultural lands previously operated as "collective farms" to be settled by German veterans similar to the Junkers' plans for the proposed "United Baltic Dutchy" and some other industrial and raw resource concessions as the conquers BUT, that the Slavs would retain cultural, economic, and political autonomy over their cities and privately owned farms with the caveat that Germans assume military command to deter any possible Soviet resurgence as well as handling foreign policy for both Slavic and Germanic protection. Essentially, the Germans should've said, *_"You can be starving slaves under Stalin _**_-OR-_**_ well-fed and protected serfs under Germany as semi-autonomous protectorates. With Stalin, you've no future but, at least with us, you can have families, live fulfilling lives, and worship in peace under the governance of your own blood and NEVER be conscripted again. Neither future is perfect but, at least under us, you'll be able to live as yourselves."_* In the end, if they'd done that, they'd still be in power and the former Soviets who'd fought with them would have no grand expectations to be quashed and made frustrations. Honesty is generally the best policy.

@EQOAnostalgia

2 ай бұрын

You don't understand the movement behind the Bolsheviks then, and their ultimate aims. They were always going to topple Germany, from within, or without and had already infiltrated many aspects of their lives, socially, politically by WWI... the stab in the back for example.

@qwertyasdfgh1014

2 ай бұрын

They knew this in the Soviet Union and they chose to fight against the Germans regardless of everything. It is interesting that even now the Westerners have this view full of contempt towards the Russians and think that they are waiting to be slaves to the Westerners.

@noflexzone2.055

2 ай бұрын

you seriously underestimate Russians

@Viktor_vonthe_Rhaefnhyrst

2 ай бұрын

@@noflexzone2.055 On the contrary, I respect them, hence my argument for the Germans winning them over as benevolent alternatives to Godless Marxism instead of attempting to destroy them though, in this comment, I included ALL Soviet peoples. The Russians were a serf people besieged by an ideology that massacred their spiritual leaders, destroyed their traditions, and decimated their material security for the empty promise of a utopia that could never come. You seriously underestimate their desire to free of such fetters. If the Wehrmacht had had their allegiance, the Soviets would've had NO CHANCE. That is how strong I believe the Russians to be, and Germany was moronic for not appealing to them.

@noflexzone2.055

2 ай бұрын

@@Viktor_vonthe_Rhaefnhyrst The problem was the top of the German war machine (Hitler and his guys) were all virulent racists and that clouded their judgement. The middle section of officers was much more competent and understood the situation on the ground. They could have easily united the Baltics and Ukraine against Russia. But the SS had to come in and screw everything up. They killed, tortured and r*ped and this galvanized the locals against the Germans. I blame Hitler and the SS for a lot that went wrong. Germany could have ended up becoming the savior for what’s left of modern-day Europe had they not gone so far with the original Nazi ideology. There would be no Soviet Union, no Communism, and no nuclear arms race (The US would have ended up becoming the only country with a nuclear weapon). There would be no Israel-Gaza conflict, as most of the Jews would have been deported to what was then Palestine and the remainder absorbed under a newer eastern European state along with the Ukrainians. And Europe would never be dealing with such mass migration from muslim countries. Germany had so much god darned potential and failed to live up to it, they cracked under the pressure, and I cannot blame them. At least that’s more than what I can say about South Asia, where I am from. Our peak was a millenia ago. Now, all the world seems to think we’re just a bunch of dirt-poor scammers and r*pists. At least I’m dark skinned enough that I can get away with saying I am Sri Lankan. My fellow Americans can’t tell the difference so I get away with that. I wish I could say I was ethnically German.

It was written in his book Mein Kampf that he thought all Slavic people were subhuman so this would never have happened

@GFXwtf

27 күн бұрын

That's not written in the Mein Kampf. Hitler said that the Soviet Union was ruled by suhumans, by that he meant the bolsheviks, not the slavs as a race.

The Jewish Autonomous Oblast in the far east is an interesting relic of the Soviet era. A most fascinating timeline. Very telling that it even exists really

@donjuan2509

2 ай бұрын

I always ask poeple to look at the flag of that oblast, still exists

@AzureSymbiote

2 ай бұрын

@@donjuan2509Wow, so it's that one! How... unsurprising...

@donjuan2509

2 ай бұрын

explains alot doesnt it..noahide laws @@AzureSymbiote

@sacWeapons

Ай бұрын

it was made so Stalin could send all of the Soviet Jews there. He was planning a massive purge of the Jewish population but died before his plans could come to fruition.

@theforgot3n1

Ай бұрын

Omg you guys have figured out the Truth! It's almost like a video game, the clues are super obscure and cannot possibly be coincidental.

...was going to war.

yes, I also thought that this was a missed chance for Nazi Germany....! You don't mention the 16.000 Flemish volunteers for the Waffen SS that fought in the East against bolsjevism ! It is a mystery for me that your channel is still up !!! Hang in there !

Going against the British empire, Soviet Union and the USA concurrently wasnt the best idea

@user-kx3fq1zo6f

2 ай бұрын

What choice did he have?

@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044

2 ай бұрын

@@user-kx3fq1zo6f ask him i suppose although he hasn't been available for comment since 30/4/1945 Remember the relationship between Germany and soviet union was cooperative 1939 -41 and the Soviet Union wasn't supporting the British Empire against Germany.. Japan whilst tense with the Soviet Union wasn't an enemy of it preferring to target the USA, hence Germany declaring war on the USA with whoom it's relationship was poor in solidarity with Japan who wasn't attacking the Soviet Union was a folly as it drove the USA into alignment with the British Empire and the Soviet Union with the only gain of Japan being a spoiler and limited exchange of materials to mutually support their war efforts.

Very good video. Congrats! Even though crass mistakes were made by the Germans, no amount of strategy and resources would’ve broken the will of the Russian people to defend their land. Germany was bound to loose in the end. As it did.

I still maintain that the biggest mistake was made in 1933. The new NSDAP government should have set up a state-business credit bank and a state fuels company. With a billion-mark, long-term, low-interest, payment-deferred loan, Germany should have invested heavily in Romanian oil. Germany should have renovated equipment, set up new refineries, built new pipelines, drilled new wells, and put thousands of underground storage tanks for refined products in the countryside, deeply in the interior of Germany. Germany should have either nationalized or directed the private rail corporation to build all-new rail corridors through both Austria and Czechoslovakia in case one or the other blocked passage. (What country wouldn't want its trade corridors renovated for free?) Romanian oil production had been dropping. By 1940, it was half the amount of the early '20s. Romanian production reached its peak in the 1970s, so tests in the 1930s must have shown the ability to pump far more. Germany could have always made a deal with Romania to trade its big investment share for oil, and to put most of the new refineries in Romania. That way, Romania would gradually buy out the German share, and would have modern refineries to process Middle East oil once its own fields gave out. With ample fuel, Germany could have built far more war vehicles, and could have used them far more in a modern mechanized war of mobility. Oh, almost forgot. Give Romania plenty of modern anti-aircraft artillery and interceptor planes, and train its military to use them.

@chewchewtrain

Ай бұрын

What too much HOI4 does to a mfer. I’m sure more oil would have accounted for the massive gap in production, manpower, resources, cohesion, and morale that the Axis powers faced. Literally all the Allies had to do to win was just not surrender immediately like the Germans were counting on.

@JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese

Ай бұрын

Germany didn't have the manpower for war and domestic food stuffs to feed their population. It was a de facto loss by 1942

@floycewhite6991

5 күн бұрын

@@chewchewtrain Germany dragged its feet in preparation for the war everyone saw coming. The Soviets didn't. Fuel was Germany's greatest weakness, but not its only weakness. The others would have been easier to rectify.

Wow, another great video. This is a very good point that is often lost on most historians. Most of them say once Hitler invaded the Soviet Union there was never a chance of German victory. However, they neglect to examine the German policy regarding the Slavic nations they managed to take during Operation Barbarossa. If he had even just promised them autonomy within a greater German super state, Germany would have had enough manpower and resources to completely conquer the Soviet Union.

One of the most astute observations I’ve heard is on the notion that if Nazi Germany had done this or that differently then they might have won. It went, “If they would’ve done anything differently then they wouldn’t have been Nazis”.

@jgnogueira

2 ай бұрын

Tbh I think just the fact that nazi were vibing with the whole Aryan race masterpiece, made relationship with their allies very difficult, if you actually look at the documents and relationships between the Aexis countries shit was kinda tough, hitler was pissed with Mussolini for losing in Greece and japan didn’t really cared about helping Germany that much, they were more busy with conquering Asia, the allies also had many different ideologies but they put those differences aside for a while to defeat a common enemy something the Alies didn’t because they were too proud to do it.

@gunbutter830

2 ай бұрын

@@jgnogueira That's a good point but I was talking about the racial superiority thing that made it impossible for the Germans to see the Ukrainians as equals or even pretend to see them as equals. Further, the fact that the Nazi at all times during the war diverted 10% of their military power to rounding up Jews was disastrous. Do you know how many battles they would've won with 10% more. So many of their battlefield defeats came down to tiny percent this or that way. Ultimately, they still would've lost bc they pick a fight with three major powers but still.

@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044

27 күн бұрын

If this that it can never be proven either way

Refreshing to to be exposed to a more independent interpretation of Hitler & the Third Reich. The prevailing narrative so often reflects the distortions & prejudices of the Allied victors.

My friends grand uncle was recruited into the free British corps of the ss after being captured in North Africa, very interesting.

The modern lesson from this is that if the West wants to defeat communism, they need to rapproche with Rxssia and identify as the Global North rather than the West. Rxssia is the key to cxntxxnxng Chxna, who has only ever been conquered by weaker asymmetrical fxrces from the north by land (whereas by sea, overwhelming technological advantages from the Japanese and Europeans were needed, which will never return with current trends). The neocons keep acting like they can somehow contain Rxssia and Chxna both at the same time, and/or that they have some kind of influence or control over Chxna (looks more like the opposite), or that (pro-Rxssia, anti-Chxna) India is all they need to cxntxxn China even when they keep waging wxr against India's favorite Global North country of Rxssia and India drifts further and further from the West into some sort of confused middleman position the more the neocons dig into their completely failed, pro-communist strategy that has given Chxna immense leverage over and access to almost every critical thing they need out of Rxssia which we just handed to them on a silver platter with this pointless wxr.

While I agree they should have sought allyship of more Eastern populations there is a flaw in believing this could win the war. The Germans did not have infinite resources to supply any number of troops. Since resources were limited it is understandable why they would prioritize their own soldiers.

It's not a question of allocating resources to willing eastern European volunteers in the initial phase of Barbarossa because the resources on hand were barely enough to sustain the 3 million Germans marching into Russia. Its more of a question of how to maintain supply lines to the mechanized units that increasingly were stretching thin and scarce every week and kilometer. Battles were being won by the tank and airplane in a war of movement and encirclement not by local volunteers with guns.

Its too bad Hitler never read history beyond Prussia, reading history of the Dutch republic would have helped Germany. Maybe that was a good thing for Britain.

Even if Germany had made different tactical choices on the battlefield, the eventual deployment of the atomic bomb by the Allies would likely have been a decisive factor

Yes, even Stalin agreed with you, which is why he was clinically depressed, expecting his own people to arrest him after German invasion. When Stalin found out Nazis were killing 3 million Soviet prisoners & 1 million Soviet Jews, he knew USSR would unite under his terror.

@floycewhite6991

Ай бұрын

Fractured Fairy Tale.

This is something I think a lot of people are coming to the conclusion of and it's great that you've put it out there like this, really well done. I think that today, we really take for granted this idea of a European Commonality, a single European civilization and vision for the future. Germany proved those ideas concreted Correct during the second world war and honestly laid the groundwork for the Integration of Europe into the EU today. The vision of the Holy Roman Empire under Charlesmagne, Otto the Great and Charles V, of the Napoleonic Empire, of the Kaiserreich's Mittleuropa, the New Order of the Axis and finally the European Union; of Dominant Leaders who ruled over not just Germany but held the power of direction over all of Europe for the purpose of a common Spiritual-Cultural-Civilization struggle - this was something that only the German Regime during WWII was able to achieve in harsh, necessary practice with the Political, Economic and Military Integration of Europe for the conflict against the USSR. No such conflict had ever involved LITERALLY all of Fully developed Europe in history, including hundreds of thousands if not millions of the citizens of the primary Antagonist to that Common European Civilization. That was achieved, mobilized and rhetorically embedded into the minds of Western Europeans within the span of less than 3 years during wartime occupation. I'd assess that as Remarkable, given the records of the Walloons, Nords, Spaniards etc. For Eastern Europeans, even during the 2 years of occupation there was significant success in the construction of collaborative relationships (albeit not at all counting Poland, which was in a different situation to the Soviet populations). Most of the Soviet population really only became aware of the ideologues of the Nazi party's and apparatuses plans for them when the Soviets returned with exaggerated, exploited propaganda, murderous intentions towards the collaborators who knew better and commitment to repress any information to the contrary. Most partisans, like the Black and Green armies of the Civil War, were just bandits who had been personally wronged in some way by the war, were in the perfect terrain for hit and run guerilla lifestyles, were tying to survive during a brutal war, and were politically and financially rewarded for claiming a faux-ideological mission to their contributions to Civilian deaths by starvation and crime - we saw the same thing in China, yet we don't consider the deaths caused by Warlordism in China the same as we do the civilian casualties of the Eastern front in WWII. Anyone can look into the history of Banditry; from the Russian Civil War, to China, to the Mexican Revolution to the distant past - Like with Nomadic societies, Civilians most often travel with their Bandits in large Bands (Hence, Band-it - an armed member of the Band) and unfortunately suffer their same fate very often. And as we know from history, these Bandits can bring down entire Empires. The fact that these bandits were literally finances and in some cases obligated to organize under Political Commissars, make this all the more dangerous. Most of the mobilized military manpower from the German occupation of Soviet territory was therefore employed first in putting down the menace of the bandits (Hence why Anti-Partisan mission were called Banditkrieg, it was far from a euphemism) and in the reconstruction of infrastructure necessary for transport and resource extraction - the men who would become soldiers in 1943-44 were likely Laborers first in their occupied territory from 41-43. While the population hated the Soviet Union, there was still an interior Social war being fought within occupied societies with those who didn't - who harbored resentment towards Nationalism or religion, or who were simply indoctrinated and comfortable within their Soviet brainwashing. Many believed the Germans would lose the War and this was their reason. In any case, it took time for the German occupiers to prove themselves to the population - and the judgement of their success can be seen in how cooperation improved year to year even up to the Soviet's return in 1943-44. The fact that the Partisan situation and Infrastructure situation was relatively stabilized in time for Fall Blau in 1942 (The German push towards the Caucasus), it's aftermath in 1943 in withdrawing Army Group South from the Caucasus and mobilization as a fighting force capable of slowing down the Soviets after July, 1944 is a testament to the importance of that manpower usage in Non-combat roles prior to mobilization for combat. While it might seen entirely possible to have utilized the Post-Soviet peoples more by the Axis, the ingredient of Time was always going to be their Fatal Deficiency in achieving that, as well as so much else. Such is what happens to a coalition which builds power so quickly and which has such permanently expansive dreams. See also: Caesar, Charles V and Napoleon. Thanks for the video, mate.

@EQOAnostalgia

2 ай бұрын

Do you have an enter key? I couldn't climb that wall with a rope and spiked shoes!

This mistake makes even a person sceptical of today's narrative about WWII think that all that story about Hitler thinking of Slavs and Russians in particular as inferior to Germans, being subhumans basically, is true. Hitler didn't like at all the idea of giving the Russians their independent state. He thought the same about Ukranians and that's why he sent to concentration camps Ukrainian nationalists, like Stepan Bandera. In your newer video, you said that Germans simply didn't have enough people to settle across all of western Russia. And that might be true but only for a short period. I'm sure that gradually, over decades, Germans would push Russians more and more away to the east, taking their space as Americans did this to the natives. This leads me to the conclusion, that even thou I'm a Russian anti-communist and I hate Lenin and Stalin with all my heart, they are still a lesser evil than Hitler for my people.

@marktwain8121

2 ай бұрын

Hitler was homosexual ,he was most probably a puppet just like Zelenski of the bankers .The bankers are satanists they supported financially the Russian revolution from 1905 and the bolsevik revolution .Being Satan helpers they hated cristianity ,thats why they killed the priests in Russia and they subverted the church in the west .

@floycewhite6991

Ай бұрын

@@marktwain8121 Project much?

@user-uy8wx4pk4h

14 күн бұрын

Bandera was literally an insane murderer.

I maintain, his greatest mistake was saying that Jesus didn't finish what he started, and that he was going to... with a foundation like that, you're bound to topple over.

@MoloIongo

2 ай бұрын

What does Jesus Christ have to do with this?

@harrykimura9830

2 ай бұрын

Jesus is Lord ​@@MoloIongo

@MoloIongo

2 ай бұрын

@@harrykimura9830 This is true

@greenshirtiv4n211

2 ай бұрын

@@MoloIongoit is finished

@purplehaze1274

2 ай бұрын

I doubt Hitler ever made such a statement.

The Axis had as many people as the USSR. It could barely equip and supply its own forces, much less millions more Ukrainians and White Russians. The fuel needed for the kind of mobile war needed to defeat USSR was unavailable, but the Axis could early have built more artillery ad fortifications. Under Stalin, USSR turned away from international revolution and toward building socialism in one State. Making peace in the West and building trust with the USSR was a wiser course than Hitler's.

Great information but you talk too fast man. Slow it down. Or is the voice AI ?

A slightly less racist Hitler simply wouldn't be Hitler.

@mightisright

2 ай бұрын

To quote a famous jew, "If you guys were the inventors of Facebook, you'd have invented Facebook."

When mainstream hisyorians are talking about Hitlers mistakes they mention small details like some battles and some maneuvers. But in truth I couldn't also understand why and how Germans could not exploit golden opportunity to be seen and hailed as a liberators, and also get overwhelming support of even disaffected populace that if not to kill soviets then fight for freedom. Even back then there were millions of people wishing to kill soviets and avange their loved ones. What soviets did in time of occupation couldn't be mended even generations passed :/

Without US intervention, Germany would have certainly defeated USSR.

@j.k.1239

Ай бұрын

USSR defeated German offensive long before the intervention.

Ive embraced ( ANIMAL FARM)

General Vlasov amazing story

Your videos are good and informative. However, you should try speaking a tad bit slower. No need to be in a rush.

Germany needed oil rather than untrained foreign volunteers.

@killerklinge52

2 ай бұрын

They needed both. Oil was more importand, since most tanks, and planes couldnt even used because of lacl of oil, but also menpower was importand against an enemy which outnumbered you 5 to 1

@zupnanazwa

Ай бұрын

Thats a myth they only had 5:1 advantage well after 1944 when Germany already had no chances of winning and their desperate atemots were met with force. Germany didnt lose the war because of some innacuraces but rather the Soviets won. Lack of communication and tactics that would only work in certain situations when everything was right were finally life checked and utterlly led to failure which was Barbarossa ​@@killerklinge52

I don’t know if I’m stupid for thinking this. Wasn’t another big mistake of his to not at all trust any jews, and treat them so horribly? If he hadn’t made that mistake, it seems to me he would’ve also had much better chances of winning against the sovjets eventually, and their war with (mainly) the British might not have happened. I know the British would’ve bombarded their people with propaganda either way as churchill wanted war, but if they had treated the Jews better, there wouldn’t have been so much anekdotel evidence and making propaganda would’ve been harder. Maybe then Churchill would’ve focussed more on making the sovjets enemies rather than Nazi’s?

@floycewhite6991

Ай бұрын

Churchill's War by David Irving.

@ForestryService.

20 күн бұрын

The Js sabotaged Germany from within how do you trust them after that

Quite frankly, if the Germans focused on restoring their borders to a state similar to what they were pre Peace of Westphalia. While at the same time they did not bother expanding their borders eastward, other than by liberating the Eastern European people from Communism, they would have been a lot more popular among all Europeans.

Not sure if it had changed much considering how much resources the Anglos send to the soviets Maybe if he had made these promises before Barbarossa and managed to get to Moscow

@damianoasteriti8530

7 күн бұрын

At the time of their rebellion against the jewish world order all nations were in their hands, learn about the evil freemasonic rebellions a hundred years prior WW1 and you will understand how ignorant you are

The problem was that the Nazis considered both Slavic and Baltic people to be subhuman just 1 step above Jews and Gypsies so they planned to either kill or expell their population after the end of the war or in the best case to use them for cheap occupational forces like the Ukrainian Liberation Army and the Croat-Bosniak Ustase.

@basedpatriarch

2 ай бұрын

Lies

@noflexzone2.055

2 ай бұрын

@@basedpatriarch stop sugarcoating the racist Hitler we all know lol

@oglocbaby520

2 ай бұрын

I may have difficulty citing this, but I believe the Nazis actually deemed certain eastern Europeans, and certain percentages of them, as fit for "Aryanization". IF I remember correctly, I believe Poles were seen as to be disposed of, probably used for slave labor and most likely sterilized, etc. I can't cite specific numbers, but a good number of people from the Baltic countries, Ukraine, etc. were considered acceptable by their standards. Moscow was to be completely flooded, as it was seen as a place of filth and decadency of which Bolshevism rose from. There are countless genocides throughout history, many even within the last roughly 100 years, but this stuff is a totally different level of intensity, planning, etc.

@Haleightyeight

2 ай бұрын

​@noflexzone2.055 the guy who did nothing wrong? How was Hitler "racist"?

@noflexzone2.055

2 ай бұрын

@@oglocbaby520 I agree with you, a decent portion of eastern Europeans were said to be fit for aryanization too. The problem is that Germans always came first, and the most sensible people who could carry out this plan effectively were overruled by the SS. Any good thing the regular German army and its officials did was canceled out twice by all the crap the SS did. No man can see his wife and daughter r*ped and his son killed or forced into slavery and fight for the side that did this. Make no mistake, the SS and late-stage Nazism kept soviet communism alive for another 50 years. Germans are a highly idealistic and pragmatic people, which made their inability to form a coherent anti-Russian coalition highly surprising and demonstrates how intuitively anti-German late-term Naz*sm was in reality. Had Hitler and the SS kept their hands off when it came time to assimilate the Eastern Europeans and focused on carving out a homeland for the rural Polish Jews in Palestine, the high likelihood is that the vast majority of Eastern Europe, including the Baltic states, Ukraine, and Romania would have all come under solid Axis control that the Russians could not contend with. There have been countless genocides throughout history, and while some of them may have been understandable, it doesn’t make any of them right. Hitler correctly noticed urban bourgeoisie atheistic communistic J*ws screwing up German society by tampering with the culture, but that cannot excuse the rounding up of millions of J*ws in rural Poland who did nothing to earn Hitler’s wrath but just exist. Had he pulled a French revolution and executed any communists who dabbled with decadent, nihilistic crap like most of the urban elite were doing at the time (lol 1920s Berlin), he might have solved the “J*wish problem” without having to build a single camp. Personally, I would like to equate the lead up to WW2 with the French Revolution and the fallout that happened with it. For example, the French Revolution started out right, correctly identifying that the decadent French elite and high-level clergy were destroying the country. Then they went too far and hurt the normal French peasants, who were happy with their priests. Then Napoleon took over full control of the country (Nazis in the late 1930s), which earned the ire of the rest of Europe. From there, it was inevitable that failure would result. My take is that Germany could have easily won WW2 had they stopped at expanding past Poland (the phony war period) and focused their resources solely on Russia (who was not in a treaty with Britain or France at the time) and united the Eastern European provinces, gaining valuable allies and a consistent source of oil. Hitler’s decision to create a 2-front war and then torture his potential allies was what caused the Germans to lose WW2. Personally, I think that Hitler knew that deep down, the Baltic and Non-Jewish Ukrainians could never be truly Aryanized through the SS. So, he could not care less about them and viewed them as subhuman. Who knows what would have happened if Hitler was not as radical as he was during the chancellorship? I think a venereal disease and the fear of assassination on top of the early German victories clouded his rational mind.

Just imagine if Great Britain didn’t declare war on Germany the world wouldn’t have suffered under the Soviet Union for half a century

His mistake was not seizing Moscow when he had the chance - which would have been a deathblow to Russia. Instead he ignored his generals advice to instead focus on going south for oil.

your content is amazing but your way of speaking is totally insane to me im not an english native speaker so i struggled to hear your words and understand what you saying you are talking fast like you are on a race !

His big mistake? He picked Mussolini for an ally. I’ll tell you about Mussolini’s big mistake next week.

What r ur political views🙏🏻

Hmm.

germany invaded the ussr for more oil I agree it would take longer but they would still have lost without the soviets entering as the germans had mass manpower and oil problems

@zupnanazwa

Ай бұрын

Germany didnt have manpower problems their army grew not shrink throughout the war