I couldn't finish this, this guy's voice is putting me to sleep.

great video! nice xplanation about RNAV,RNP and PBN. Thanks

Greater video. I´ll use it on a navigation charts course. Thanks.

Thank you.Very Informative.

@humanidadeparalela4572

3 жыл бұрын

tank you very informative!! included that flat Earth!! flat Horizont!! flat airways !! flat airspace!!

I think this guys actually inhales while speaking....Like Jabba the Hut....

Sounds like Sully Sullenberger on the narration

@BenderPY

7 жыл бұрын

I knew I wasn't the only one who thought that haha

3:57 cool plane in the background

uuhm What? 13:40?

Very good video albeit needs a face lift with the background music and voice over

NEXTGEN IS A NIGHTMARE!!! Across the country once quiet communities are being assaulted by repetitive low flying flights in these new superhighways, often every 5 minutes. I have taken to wearing gun range noise cancelling headphones to block it out. Other people are being denied a full nights sleep. People who moved to quiet mountain communities now have relentless planes flying over them at about 2,000ft. Children are suffering in schools under the flight super highhway not only having noise disruptions but also from pollution. It is outrageous and the FAA knows it and willfully lies, avoids, refuses to discuss.

@ethanlamoureux5306

5 жыл бұрын

And your idea for a solution to this problem is...?

@diannelawrence8921

5 жыл бұрын

@@ethanlamoureux5306 we are involved with solutions at Sky Justice National Network face book page. It has to be congressional because the FAA has been co-opted by the airline interests, protecting their bottom line over our health and well being. There are clear solutions but the FAA is not interested At ALL. In Los Angeles the planes coming in from the east are flying at altitudes as low as 2,500 ft averaging about 3,500 - 4,000 overhead. We live with the whine of their brakes as they rapidly descend over us. This allows them to turn sooner to match the altitudes and join the flights coming in from the west headed to landing at the airport. If they came in at a higher altitude they would just have to fly out further and turn to join the flights coming in at a higher altitude. They would be high enough to be a faint sound. But this means a few more dollars to the airlines. It also doesn't solve the pollution caused by flight after flight over the same communities so there needs to be several paths.... like there used to be. There is currently a bill being presented for consideration at the House of Representatives that will fund an independent study by the National Academy of Science that will give a report on the very real health consequences these communities are suffering from. This is a national health crisis make no mistake about it. There is absolutely no restrictions or laws in place to hold the airline industry accountable to people below. With the increase in flights, private and news helicopters and eventually drones we can't afford to continue to ignore the reality. And one last thing, don't think that your community is safe or that moving will solve the problem. Right now the FAA has the authority to put in one of these paths above You at any time.

@ethanlamoureux5306

5 жыл бұрын

@@diannelawrence8921 Where I live the closest airports get only a few flights a day. I always found the air traffic over big cities irritating, but figured people must get used to it, since they continue to live in big cities where there is so much more traffic. You could always move out of the urban environment, away from busy airports. But as for the solution to air traffic, it seems to me that there is just more traffic than there used to be, so it has to go somewhere, and you can only put so many planes into one area. Keeping planes in the air longer, as it sounds like you favor, is less efficient and results in more pollution, both air and noise. A solution might be airport decentralization, so that no one airport gets overwhelmed with excessive traffic, but it seems like nobody is interested in that. I am always interested in ideas for solving problems like this, and am glad to know that you are actively looking for workable solutions, and not just saying NIMBY.

@diannelawrence8921

5 жыл бұрын

@@ethanlamoureux5306 there is definitely more traffic and there is going to be even more. The problem is that there are laws that regulate what happens in the air and they do Not take into consideration the affect on the ground. It is a bonafide health crisis. I am talking about keeping planes higher and longer by only a few minutes before they have to turn. Regarding moving....the NextGen is affecting people who did exactly that, moved to quiet mountain communities to get away from it all, like Lake Arrowhead but the Nextgen path is now going over them and because they are at higher elevations the planes are even closer to them! Can you imagine buying your dream home away from it all and then this. I've heard that story over and over. Malibu is under the flight path now as well. You could wake up one day and find they designed a flight to go over your house. That's the horrible part, some people choose to move under a flight path for cheaper property and rents but none of us chose that. And 100's of thousands are really suffering.

@ethanlamoureux5306

5 жыл бұрын

@@diannelawrence8921 The closest busy airport is over 250 miles away from where I live. Of course, things could change, rural areas can become urban, tho when you put hundreds of miles between you and the nearest big city, it makes it a lot less likely. Perhaps if we depended less on airline travel there would be less trouble. High speed rail, perhaps?

good video but annoying music (noise)