Cheney was like McNamara. "They knew the price of everything and the value of nothing..."

@roc7880

Жыл бұрын

Cheney made worse decisions than McNamara. Plus he never served.

@gregbailey1753

Жыл бұрын

Cheney had personal reasons for his hatred of Grumman.

@choasisgoated

Жыл бұрын

McNamara was a legend

@georgesykes394

Жыл бұрын

@@roc7880 McNamara served in The USAAF.

@fredklemaster3687

Жыл бұрын

Truth To Power, Brother!

In the early 1990's I was working as a stability and control aero engineer for McDonnell Aircraft. Even though Grumman was a competitor, I/we thought it was a complete travesty to not strengthen the F-14 line. The F-14 swing wing was well implemented after Grumman's lessons learned with the Jaguar and F-111. And a swing wing aircraft is the only really practical way to realize both the loiter and dash capability required for the long range fleet air defense mission.

@termitreter6545

11 ай бұрын

A delta wing can work too, with more modern designs; the Rafale seems like an extremely capable aircraft, made possible with modern tech and materials.

@michaelspivey4574

11 ай бұрын

Lockheed Skunkworks polymath Aero Engineer here. The swing wing also allowed the landing profile to have a lower speed.

@casematecardinal

3 ай бұрын

​@michaelspivey4574 The same can be accomplished with leading edge slats for much less weight and complexity.

@ancaplanaoriginal5303

3 ай бұрын

@@termitreter6545 Delta wings belong in the 60's, let the concept die already

@kennethhamilton5633

2 ай бұрын

When was the British Light attack Jaguar a swingwing 🤔. Russians had a couple, British had the Tornado.

The F-14 Tomcat is one of the sexiest planes ever. Others for me include the F-22 Raptor, the F4U Corsair, the P-51 Mustang, and the SR-71 Blackbird. It's a shame that we never got the Super Tomcat 21, and that the Tomcat is no longer in service in the United States Navy.

@roadwarrior1459

11 ай бұрын

Spitfire is far better looking than the P51

@taiwandxt6493

11 ай бұрын

Idk if it is just me, but I always thought the Blackbird looked ugly. The U-2 was a far sexier recon plane.

@jamesjross

9 ай бұрын

I'm glad you don't make funding decisions

@ghmsr8062

5 ай бұрын

Any aircraft that stayed with the navy for more than ten years was a good looking machine. Even the helicopters had their own special panache for getting the job done. Snap a crisp salute to the aircrews, maintainers and designers that made it happen with or without the politicians' support.

@GG-yr5ix

3 ай бұрын

Don't forget the A-5, it looked like it was going supersonic just sitting on the deck!

When I was a SH-60 AWS in the 90s my buddies that worked on the Tomcat always told me the maintenance issues were WAY over blown.

For 27 years in Grumman Engineering, I worked on F-14 Programs. I was the 9K TCR Task Team Leader when the F-14 Program came to an end in 2001.

@East_Coast_Toasty_Boy

9 ай бұрын

Sorry to hear that. I think the F/A-14E you guys were working on in the Super Tomcat 21 program would've been superior than this "Super" Hornet. As a former Navy avionics tech (2016-2020) the hornet is cool, but I still feel like I missed out on something better and cooler.

@PeterWolfe2012

5 ай бұрын

I'm looking forward to reading your book.

@olechristianhenne6583

Ай бұрын

That's thanks to dick Cheney

Mr. Ward, the Tomcat is the sexiest and most versitile fighter in history without a doubt. But as a retired infantryman, the A10 is my Angel and will forever hold that place in my heart!

@ILSRWY4

2 жыл бұрын

I bet the strike eagle is a close second...

@starga-fr7qx

2 жыл бұрын

@@ILSRWY4 suspect F16's are way more common to drop ordnance as air support to groudn troops then Eagles. There are way more F16's, way more countries/allies flying em.. and they are cheaper to run operationally so I'm pretty sure if not for A10's.. it was the F16's that did most of the work in the field.

@francisschweitzer8431

2 жыл бұрын

As a former A-10 Crew Chief… the F-16 can NOT do ALL that the A-10 can. Each job has its own special tool. The Warthog was made specifically for taking hits… while the F-16 can do some parts of ground support… NOTHING ELSE … not the FX-15… F-16 can get as low and slow as the A-10. In the Air Force… even though we did not think much about Navy and Naval Aviation…. Most of all maintenance troops in the USAF would agree that the Tomcat was a BADASS bird… almost tied with the F-15 Eagle

@johnhenderson3646

2 жыл бұрын

I was at the clinic waiting room one day. I was wearing my Navy shirt and a gentleman across the way had on an Army shirt. He struck up a conversation and told me that he and his unit were forever grateful to the Navy. He said in their area of ops, 9 times out of 10 when shit went down it was a few A-6 Intruders that reigned hellfire upon the North Vietnamese and saved their asses. Navy proud.

@WardCarroll

2 жыл бұрын

No quarrel there.

I was working for Northrop Grumman in the 1990’s when the program was canceled. A lot of scuttle but at the time corroborated your sentiments. In final analysis, the Armed Services Committee had more constituents in St Louis than in Bethpage. What a shame, the F-14D was an incredible warplane.

@williamorton7600

Жыл бұрын

Yep, it was then Congr Dick Cheney

@slowb4lls1

Жыл бұрын

It’s dick bag 💼 Cheney. Gah he screwed up more stuff in his career then anyone else I can think of

@tedjob21

Жыл бұрын

The company didn't become Northrop Grumman until after the Tomcat was killed.

@billkilbourne6409

Жыл бұрын

They merged after they Lost the cointract to build the YF-23 was lost by Northrop. MCD was bought by Beoing, and Grumman merger with Northrop, because Northrop wanted the "Joint Stars" program

@michaelmichaelagnew8503

Жыл бұрын

It was just Grumman back then until the company went under because of bad leadership in the government 95% of the employees were gone because of it (at least that's what I was told). Northrop Grumman was born after it but the program was lost, and the 4.5 gen interceptor we needed to replace the Tomcat that was retired.

It would be so amazing if we had a 5th Gen Tomcat. The Tom Cat is one of the best looking planes ever!

@tmwright0066

2 жыл бұрын

Hence, "Final Countdown" and "Top Gun". Notice that every successful fighter copied our twin tails! Couldn't agree with you more!

@rzozaya1969

Жыл бұрын

..maybe the F15 could be a bit better looking (which is subjectively)... but I like both.

@Mizzle420420

Жыл бұрын

Have you seen the XFA-27 from Ace Combat 7. From a video game but pretty interesting take on a reworked next gen successor to the F-14

@broadstbulliesii

Жыл бұрын

i mean technically itd probably be classified as a gen 4++

@woongah

Жыл бұрын

For me, it is a tie with the Flanker. Then again, the Flanker looks a lot like a fixed wing version of the Tomcat, which makes sense as plenty of the requirements behind it are similar (flying over the vast expanse of Siberia in winter may not be perlustrating the Pacific, but it isn't all that different either).

Politics, inter-service rivalry, and a host of other noise. The F-14 and its crews have written themselves into history as the best Naval fighter ever fielded. The Tomcat was pure BADASS.

@cycloneranger7927

2 жыл бұрын

The Hellcat would like to speak with you...

@virgildailey1970

2 жыл бұрын

@@cycloneranger7927: The Hellcat was good for it’s time. But the tomcat was even better. The tomcat was so good, that nobody wanted to challenge it. Libyans foolishly tried twice. Got splashed twice. The Japanese And North Korea didn’t hesitate to challenge the hellcat. Even the Iraqis hesitated to take on the Iranian tomcats.

@sparrowbe4k802

2 жыл бұрын

The F14 was (imo) just one of those "lucky hit's" which progressed from the drawing board to production and it just all went well. Same as the F15 [overengineered] and F16. In the late 60's , a lot of enginerding was done properly. Take a motorcycle like the Honda VTR1000 "Firestorm" : they never changed/evolved it because they got it right first time (craptastic tank range on 27mpg though). However : the F14 *_was_* truly a pain in the derriere in terms of maintenance (like the Harrier) - esp. being at sea.

@josephkelley8641

2 жыл бұрын

No doubt about it (F-14 best Naval fighter ever fielded).

@Bat21bravo

2 жыл бұрын

@@sparrowbe4k802 No F-15 has ever been shot down in 42 years by an opposing force thanks to Aeronautical Engineering. In the world of first strike all weather Air Superiority there is no such thing as "over-engineered."

Mr. Carroll - A bunch of years ago, two MiG-29's (a single seater and a tandem seater) and an IL-76 support aircraft participated in the local airshow in Kalamazoo. There was an F-14 Tomcat flight demonstration during the show (I believe it may have been flown by the late, great "Snort Snodgrass - RIP) which included an amazingly tight 360 degree circle in knife-edge flight!!!! I was standing near one of the Russian pilots and his backseater, and you could tell they were absolutely gobsmacked at the flight characteristics of the Tomcat!!!! Their reaction was priceless!!!! Thanks for all the great information! Bryan

The F-14 was one of the most iconic aircraft to ever grace our skies from a military sense...among so many others...but the Tomcat just had that something else about it...its swing wing format...its awesomely mean looking stance from the front...and its kneel when shuttled up and ready to pounce on any poor bastard that had the unfortunate pleasure of coming up against it...it was just a pure beast of a plane, in every facet...loved it when I first got into military aircraft many many moons ago...and still love it for the most beautiful of carrier aircraft I believe there has ever been...LONG LIVE THE TOMCAT!!!!!

I'm still watching old episodes on this channel, just catching up on my education, and what jumps straight out at me is a saying we have of "Penny wise, pound foolish." But politicians rarely admit their mistakes, and the rest is history. A fascinating video, thanks. 👋

That last 4 minutes not only nails the dysfunction of defence acquisition but the total tragedy of throwing the F-14 under the bus.

@Scott11078

2 жыл бұрын

That's why I tell people they had been trying to kill old Tom off since he was still in the womb doging clothes hangers. And after decades of being treated like shit from people up top he ended up being murdered with his body unceremoniously tossed into the garbage. Largely what I mean by treated like shit from up top is all the upgrades denied to it. When I was on the Kitty Hawk we had VF-154, I was there from 1999-2002 and they left not long after me. I hold the honor/ distinction of being the only HT to have ever had to work on a Tomcat. It's too long to put here, it is truly It's own story but a short bit of info I had to rig something up to keep a part that had no spares remaining functional. If I couldn't do that then the Squadron would have been down one cat forever AND they would have been disqualified from the gun ex they were taking part in 2 days later. Recently as part of that whole aging process we go back and evaluate things from life. Recently I've adopted the belief that as successful as it was and in the face of constant adversity the chair, err airfarce, um airforce giving one of the best reason every branch hates them, the dirty games they played getting the F401 killed. Those smug bastards and a few politicians should have been made accessories to murder they knew damn well what was going to happen from the engine change, especially the airforce they knew people would die.

@IgnoredAdviceProductions

2 жыл бұрын

Its creation was an attempt to throw the Air Force under the bus, what goes around comes around

@martinpalmer6203

2 жыл бұрын

And the F35A costs $175,983,989 and the C with Sidekick pushing past $220 million EACH. ... im fairly sure Grumman could built a stealth cat for cheaper. Its purely kickback corruption...sad but a sign of the ultimate failure if the big fish are allowed to set the rules via bribery and corrupt politicians.

@IgnoredAdviceProductions

2 жыл бұрын

@@martinpalmer6203 Hollings delved further into the financial details. “The Navy’s first batch of F-14As rang in at $38 million per aircraft in 1973. That sounds pretty cheap compared to around $88 million for a new F-15EX these days, but when you adjust that number to reflect nearly five decades of inflation, you get a downright shocking figure of more than $234 million per F-14 Tomcat,” he said. “The F-35’s initial production run per-unit cost was also quite high, but still more than $10 million less than the Tomcat, at $221 million per fighter. By 1988, thirteen years later, the F-14D cost $74 million per airframe, which adjusted for inflation brings the Tomcat’s price down to $171 million per aircraft in today’s dollars. Last year marked thirteen years since the F-35’s first production batch, with per-unit prices of the F-35A now at around $78 million per airframe-$93 million less than the F-14 per jet,” he added. Interesting that it's fine when the F-14 is bloody expensive but when the F-35 looks like it has a somewhat high number everyone loses their mind. The F-35 is mind numbingly cheap per unit for a 5th generation multirole stealth fighter.

@martinpalmer6203

2 жыл бұрын

@@IgnoredAdviceProductions the F35 numbers are falsified "flyaway cost" doesn't include things like radar, avionics, weapon racks, DAS... all the things that make it into a fighter. I trust the USAF official crash reports which list the actual cost to replace a combat ready F35A @ $175,983,989 ... which is also extremely close to the unit cost foreign governments are paying when you divide # of aircraft by amount spent. Sorry but the "flyaway cost" is bullshit to placate the public who are being robbed blind.

I was an engine mechanic in VF-142 in the mid-'70s and transitioned from the F-4 to the F-14 (around 1974). Our squadron was attached to the USS America. I found this video by accident, but it was really interesting.

@ruthnoya8424

Жыл бұрын

How old are you now, out of curiosity?

@mister-LA

Жыл бұрын

@@ruthnoya8424 67

@ruthnoya8424

Жыл бұрын

@@mister-LA Thanks for your service, Mister.

@stevenblackwell4903

Жыл бұрын

74?? On the Forrestal we had the F-4's till 82...someone didn't like us 🤔

@brockclark7404

Жыл бұрын

Sir you served with one of the best us navy squadrons other then the sundowners

My friend, Bill Judd, worked for Grummond since late 1970. This was right after he got out of the US Navy. He was in Iran training the Shaw's mechanics on F-14 maintenance. Bill claimed (and I believe) that he had worked on every Tomcat ever made except the first one (model 001) which crashed. Bill and I were at the Reagan Library in 2018. We went to see the F-14 they had gotten. The name on the side was a man that Bill knew; the last aviator to be assigned to that plane. Bill loved the Tomcat. He retired from Pt. Mugu as a civilian contractor (Northrup-Grummond) in 2008.

@RavensEagle

Жыл бұрын

Your friend should write a book or a document, or make a video interview like so his story isn't lost to history

@philrizzardi7625

Жыл бұрын

"GRUMMAN" :)

@brinkee7674

Жыл бұрын

If he knew the F-14 so well then he should of worked for Grumman. Was he buddies with the Ayatollah. I had several Grummans myself. Even had a double ender and so didn't the girls at my stag party

@huleyn135

Жыл бұрын

Shaw..grummond...my god american ignorance even in their own native tongue is a sight to behold.

@fincadelpacuareCR

11 ай бұрын

That name sounds familiar, was he in the avionics field? I was with Grumman at Pt. Mugu in the early to late seventies, had tha opportunity to make that trip to work on the Imperial Iranian Air Force's Tomcats but didn't take it. I'd done enough traveling over eight years in the Air Force. I was involved working with the NMC techs when the Iranian pilots came through to do missile system training at the Pacific Missile Test Center out of Mugu. I on't think any of us were really fond of their safety concerns taxiing with loaded weapons.

As “Top Gun” has made me a huge fan of the Tomcat, I am seriously disappointed in the politicians and Navy for not going forward with the Super Tomcat. Thanks for the the what if scenario.

@harrisn3693

Жыл бұрын

Blame cheney

@Wolf_3125

Жыл бұрын

@@harrisn3693 That globalist bastard!!!

@D20000

Жыл бұрын

@@harrisn3693 not putin this time? aww man... that's my dads favorite thing

@harrisn3693

Жыл бұрын

@@D20000 naw, Putin is actually a top gun fan. I ain’t a Libitard if you are wondering that.

@willl7780

Жыл бұрын

@@D20000 🤣🤣

As a Prowler maintainer, I hated that the Navy turned its back on Grumman. If they could figure out how to put a dish on a lawn dart, the E2 would be gone too. 😥

@daszieher

2 жыл бұрын

difficult to understand... for most people interested in the subject, Grumman is THE naval aircraft manufacturer.

@ramosel

2 жыл бұрын

The Navy didn't turn it's back... Dick Cheney was bought off.

@terrysaunders2026

2 жыл бұрын

@@ramosel I used to enjoy that phrase “I’d rather hunt with Dick than ride with Teddy!” I still wouldn’t ride with Teddy if he was still with us, but I know a lot more about Dick nowadays!

@ramosel

2 жыл бұрын

@@terrysaunders2026 And his daughter is no peach either.

@wayfaringman8418

2 жыл бұрын

@@ramosel 1000 times this.

I fly the Super Hornet. I love it, but recognize its limitations. I do believe a Super Tomcat would have been a more capable aircraft; even now.If they had truly made it modular and upgradeable like the Super Hornet we would have a great asset in the 2020s and beyond.

@Whiskey11Gaming

2 жыл бұрын

Takes a brave Super Hornet pilot to admit that! Most Hornet jocks I know who never flew the F-14 tend to shit all over the Tomcat as you'd expect from sibling rivals! :)

@WardCarroll

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks, Bill. Much love to Rhino guys. Fly safe and kick ass, brother.

@RCAvhstape

2 жыл бұрын

@@WardCarroll Was the Rhino nickname inherited from the Phantom by the Super Hornet?

@johnyoungs7453

2 жыл бұрын

Bill, what modern day "upgrades" could've been done to the D Tomcat to bring it up to today's fighter..??

@spartanx9293

2 жыл бұрын

Honestly I think the major issue with the f-14 was its variable geometry wing Grumman did actually have a concept to replace it

I commend your candid assessment! Being a retired “Army dogfaced grunt” I can assure you that much Department of Defense procurement is suspicious to us too! Anchors aweigh!

@jeffk464

Жыл бұрын

yeah, for sure the best product doesn't always win. Our "democracy" is pretty much mostly a system of influence across the board.

as a kid, i never liked the f-18 on an instinctual level while loving the f-14 glad you confirmed what i felt as a kid

@MrSmith-zy2bp

Жыл бұрын

You must be Gen-X. Yep even as kid, there was always something about the F-18 that was off. As a kid, my favorite was always the F-15.

@TheCADDGUY

Жыл бұрын

@@MrSmith-zy2bp I'm barely a millennial, born in 1986. I don't identify as a millennial or however it's said.

@MrSmith-zy2bp

Жыл бұрын

@@TheCADDGUY Same with my wife, born early 80's. Think she has more Gen-X characteristics than I do at times.

"Spending more to get less," is the most appropriate comment concerning the Super 21 Tomcat 14D vs what we have now.

@GintaPPE1000

2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely not. The shortfalls of the Super Hornet compared to Super Tomcat are completely valid, but there is no making a 4th-generation airframe stealthy, and the stealth aspect was completely overlooked in Ward's comparison of ST21 with the F-35C. You can slather all the RAM and alter all the leading edges you want, but even the latest "semi-stealth" Gen 4++ fighters like the F-15EX have nothing on the F-35's RCS, especially from the front quarter. The glib comment about wasting $1.2 trillion for the F-35C also completely ignores the huge leaps in capability the other F-35 variants have given, especially to allies who could otherwise not afford stealth technology or have a (STOVL) carrier-based stealth fighter.

@wayfaringman8418

2 жыл бұрын

@@GintaPPE1000 Mea culpa, I was speaking to the Tomcat vs Hornet capabilities. It is known the F-35 brings more and different things to the table not available in the '90s. Fortunately, it hasn't been an issue to be concerned about.

@liquidrockaquatics3900

2 ай бұрын

We spend more to get less because the government prints as much money as it desires for any project that will enrich the congressional members that are involved. It’s not an accident that we are stuck in forever wars and our money has less value than an equal weight of bacon.

Great history presentation, Ward. I work for Navair, and spent several years doing depot level work on the Tomcat in Norfolk. My specialty was the environmental control systems, which provided cooling for the weapons systems, and the cockpit ECS. (I spent hundreds of hours in the nose wheel well, where all the lines intersected) In addition to the A models, some of the B and D conversions were done. The wing gloves were riveted closed, and the plumbing for the cooling system for the Phoenix was omitted. The early 90’s was a glum time for naval aviation. Scores of squadrons across the spectrum were being decommissioned. Intruders were rolling fresh off the overhaul line and straight to the scrappers. Dozens of Tomcats were being stripped of useful parts so as to scrap the airframes. It was a sad time. But the pilots who were still flying the Tomcats loved them. Pilots who would arrive at the depot to fly Tomcats back to Oceana told stories of how the hornet pilots on the boat were constantly calling for a tanker while the F-14 guys could stay aloft for hours. With the hornet’s short legs, the joke was that the hornet would make a fine attack plane as long as you were bombing Argentina. I was at the FRC at Jacksonville for the ceremony commemorating rollout of the last Tomcat in 2005. The following year they were retired completely. I have been with the Super Hornet for 16 years now, and it has matured into a very capable platform, but there will never be another combat aircraft like the mighty Grumman F-14 Tomcat.

@WardCarroll

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the work over the years and for adding this detail here.

@jimkluska253

2 жыл бұрын

@Alentangy..thanks for keeping us safe!

@pfrstreetgang7511

2 жыл бұрын

Appreciate you sharing your experience

@jamesdellinger3542

2 жыл бұрын

I'm curious as to what cooling a weapons system involves. I do hvac as a trade, so that combines a couple of my interests 😁

@thetruthisoutthereyt

2 жыл бұрын

The Tomcat will also be the most beautiful/handsome Navy jets ever.

I have only recently discovered this channel, and have watched maybe half a dozen videos going back several years. I have to say that the writing for this channel is a cut above. Certainly it is personally informed by actual experience, but not everyone who has done the thing can describe the thing so well. I can only assume that communication plays a large part in US naval aviation. Thank you for sharing your observations and analysis so clearly, in a way that enhances their value, both in terms of history and entertainment. A rare feat, and one which you can apparently execute on a weekly basis.

@stamleymurphy4643

11 ай бұрын

R❤❤❤❤❤❤

@ronaldjarrett8262

2 ай бұрын

Which channel it it if you don't mind me asking?

Grew up in North Massapequa on Long Island, about 2 miles south of the Bethpage plant, my uncle was as electronics installer at Grumman primarily on the A6 Intruder at both Bethpage and, later, out at Calverton. Many of my neighbors worked on Grumman planes and the lunar module program. I served in VF-32 during 82-84. Lot's of Grumman in my blood...the aviation industry fell apart on Long island with the closing/merger of Grumman and the closing of Fairchild Republic. All those facilities are still there but it's incredibly depressing to see all of that manufacturing gone.

Even though it's gone, when I think Naval Air Capability I think of the F14. And while it's an arcade flying game, the F14 will always be one of my favorite planes to fly in Ace Combat.

@Pramit2000

Жыл бұрын

And every other aircraft games.

@phantombags

Жыл бұрын

This is hilarious! I was just playing with the F-14 on my PSP, Ace Combat! Lol. Small world!

@guts-141

Жыл бұрын

And the Tomcat became more popular than ever thanks to Maverick again Ace Combat 7 Tomcats DLC are basically AST-21 in disguise

@spartanchief1785

Жыл бұрын

I’ve been using the Tomcat a lot in Project Wingman. Very fun.

@barnacle_bill2257

Жыл бұрын

@@Pramit2000 have you played DCS?

13:36 Has there ever been a more beautiful aircraft? What a work of art.

@sbg911

2 жыл бұрын

R.J. Mitchell: "Hold my beer"

As someone who spends a lot of his time in the Digital Simulation of the Tomcat you used as examples. I curse the decisions that led to the cancellation of the Supercat. An F-14 with glass cockpit , AMRAAM's and Supercruise would be damn near unstoppable.

@karsu

Жыл бұрын

Oh shoot it’s @Animarchy! He everywhere like JaxBlade! Well. You are right, and we can blame Dick Cheney for that.

@2hedz77

Жыл бұрын

In DCS is there a Hornet and Super Hornet? Or just one?

@chrisboek2346

Жыл бұрын

Super hornet is a newer hornet or I should say a improvement

I for one could never understand why the Navy didn't insist on keeping the Tomcat. I was stationed at VX-4 ('87), then VX-9/Weapons test ('95) at Point Mugu. I saw all the improvements and installed them in the F-14A/B/D as an Aviation Electricians Mate. Also, side by side with the F-18. The F-14 was far superior to the F-18 in every way. I was hoping the F-14 would make a comeback, this plane will always be #1 with me. Thank you for your video and your service to our country.

@jacobmccandles1767

9 ай бұрын

I will preface this with "You probably know more than me, as I am a mere enthusiast". That said, as I see it... The latest variants of the AMRAAM-EX are capable of matching the range of the AIM-54, and with better manuverability and reliability on small targets like multirole strike fighters (SU-32), and cruise missiles. The Hornets and Super Hornets are simply lower maintenance. Buddy-refuling stores on a KA-6 or KA-18 can extend the range of a strike package to equal the tomcat. One former Tomcat pilot was saying that late model cats were known to occasionally explode! This due to an engine housing flaw. Lives were lost. The Tomcat's wicked flat spin charachteristic was never entirely solved. It was reportedly still tougher to land on a carrier than smaller aircraft with more centralized thrust. At the end of the day, the Tomcat was still a borderline ensign eliminator with a unique and unreliable missile. Past the merge almost every late-4th gen aircraft could out manuever it in a turning fight. She was slowly becoming a bomb truck, in a Navy that increasingly sought multi-role aircraft. The Tomcat was a thing of speed, good maneuverabity for it's size, and absolute beauty... but age comes for them all.

It's ironic that the Air Force wanted a tandem aircraft and got a side by side one and the Navy wanted side by side and got tandem. The other navalized feature the F-111 inherited was the escape pod, which had it been included in the Tomcat would have saved Goose.

@The_Tau

2 жыл бұрын

If only Goose followed the procedure of manually ejecting canopy first and then actually ejecting... ;)

@delayed_control

2 жыл бұрын

lmao

@starga-fr7qx

2 жыл бұрын

@@The_Tau He wanted to see them great balls of fire on the canopy explosive bolts fire, up close and follow em out.

@kdrapertrucker

2 жыл бұрын

That pod has killed more crew members then it has saved.

@johnharris6655

2 жыл бұрын

The writers killed Goose. It did not matter what type of plane he was in, he was going to die to further the plot.

I'm a former member of the USAF RF-4C community. I'm impressed with your knowledge of aircraft and your ability to present the information. This video answered a lot of questions that I had about the reasons the F-14 was retired so soon.

I just got to go on the midway carrier in San Diego and I drove my wife nuts trying to get up on deck to see the f14 they ..what a super sweet plane. When you see it up close and get a real good look at the curves and angles it is such a beauty. Still my favorite of all time.

Thanks for a most informative and enjoyable Tomcat presentation. I was an engineering undergrad at PAX in the late 60s where I watched an F-111 catapult launch. In 1971 I worked in PriFly on Independence when an F-14 was towed out to pier 12 Norfolk and hoisted aboard and towed around for the chance to evaluate how the big airplane would fit on the flight deck regarding parking, catapulting, etc. After active duty I was a reservist, then civilian maintainer on the F-8 flight simulator and F-4 cockpit procedures trainer. We actually transitioned an F-14 pilot into the RF-8G. Upon losing the only TF-8 in Dallas, Vought and the Navy came to us to aid the Philippine AF pilots in transitioning from their F-86s to the F-8. FAA ATC from '83 to '05. Kind of strayed from the F-14 topic. Thanks again.

I loved Admiral's Tom comment to Congress that there wasn't enough trust in Christendom to make a fighter out of the F111B.

@TurboHappyCar

2 жыл бұрын

I was confused by this. The quote is: "There isn’t enough *thrust* in all Christendom to make a Navy fighter out of that airplane.” Savage! 😂

@ericneilson1198

2 жыл бұрын

But late in its life, it did well as the EF Raven. Late bloomer I suppose.

@spannerturnerMWO

2 жыл бұрын

Not as well as you would think. While it did perform its mission adequately enough, the Spark Vark was severely limited in its jamming capability. That's what happens when you power all of your ECM assets off engine power alone. When there was a choice between a Prowler and a Spark to provide you a corridor into Bosnia, the Prowler got the call. Witnessed it first hand as we would watch the Prowlers taxi past the buttoned up EF-111s in Aviano, Italy.

@TurboHappyCar

2 жыл бұрын

@@spannerturnerMWO That's interesting. You would think that the manufacturer would upgrade the generators and accessory drive to produce enough power, and that the engine power lost would be preferable to the drag from the Prowler pod's Ram Air Turbines... but I guess not?

I ran the Grumman systems test/analysis group in the early 80’s we were integrating the Tcs into the avionics suite. I designed a real time ACM training system it worked first time out.only1 F-14 was configured with this enhancement, so off it went without my full design operating yet I had a small group of smart engineers working in theSITS LAB making minor changes that could be software only and the Northrop group made the hardware changes. When VX-4 flew the latest configuration, they took it to Miramar. We at Grumman got this feedback. “Hot damn just what we need.” Too bad Dirty Dick Cheney didn’t like Grumman, and didn’t approve funding. The capability to train like you fight was lost.

@soonerfrac4611

2 жыл бұрын

I’m really hoping that the new next gen fighter will be a Grumman so we can have another Cat.

@briantaylor9701

2 жыл бұрын

Other than using his government ties to enrich Halliburton shareholders, are there any redeeming qualities possessed by Dick Cheney to explain why he got to a place of power and influence big enough to cause so much damage to America, its reputation abroad, its capabilities and so much more (Not that enriching people at the cost of our country's well-being is "redeeming".)?

@soonerfrac4611

2 жыл бұрын

Sad to say that using your ties in previous or after government life to enrich yourself and others isn’t uncommon. But there’s something else most people don’t seem to understand about the Halliburton contract that they got for oil well service in Iraq post-invasion: not much profit. Regardless of what you heard they did *NOT* make a butt load of money off the oil services provided to the Iraqi’s. They did make a crap ton off a subsidiary called KBR, but that’s a whole other story. But back to Halliburton proper. The contract that any prospective service company had to sign had a clause that forbid any profit margins over something like 6 or 8%. Any profit over that amount was immediately turned over to the Iraqi government. I’m not sure how much you know about the ONG industry but that’s cutting it so close that most companies won’t even bother with it. In fact, after complaining about Bush giving the contract to Halliburton during the campaign, Obama immediately had the bidding process reopened. Nobody offered to bid, they actively sought out companies to take over the contract including Schlumberger. The Iraq government owed a very significant amount of money to France and even though Schlumberger essentially rules (to this day) most of the ME & Africa in terms of oil service industry, they balked at the stipulation for such low profit margins. So Obama went back to Halliburton with his hat in hand and asked them return to the bidding. Mind you that they also had to do all that on such a tight budget as well as providing security to their people and equipment in the process. Dick Cheney has a lot of faults, that wasn’t one of them.

@LRRPFco52

2 жыл бұрын

So Cheney sometime in the 1980s killed the ACM real-time trainer for the F-14A TCS? He was a Congressman at that time from Wyoming (1979-1989). How would that even have come across his desk?

@downix

2 жыл бұрын

@@LRRPFco52 because it was axed in 1990, after Cheney was Secretary of Defense.

Loved the video. You skipped a crucial phase in the Tomcat air-to-ground saga. In 1999 VF-14 (for whom I was the intel officer) and VF-41 onboard the Roosevelt, effectively utilized LANTERN against targets in Kosovo and Iraq. That success put to bed the fears generated by the VF-41 incident in Bosnia and should have been used more effectively as a proof point in favor of continued Tomcat development and deployment.

@kevinv9565

Жыл бұрын

I made that cruise. Black Aces first Tomcat squadron dropped iron bombs that deployment. Admiral Mike Borda visited us that deployment God rest his soul

I’ve despised Dick Cheney for years at this point in my life, but after learning that he bears the biggest responsibility for killing the Super Tomcat, I couldn’t hate the man more.

I've always loved the Hornet, but from the first day my little brain became aware of the Tomcat's existence as a child, it had, has, and will have, the top place in my heart when it comes to naval aviation.

@----.__

2 жыл бұрын

The F14, the Apache, and the Blackbird. The aviation trio of awesomeness.

@JonHuhnMedical

2 жыл бұрын

Those were 3 of the 5 model kits I built as a kid. The other two being the F5 in "mig 28" color scheme, and the F111.

@----.__

2 жыл бұрын

@@JonHuhnMedical The F5 was certainly a cool looking jet, and the Pig holds a place in most Aussie's hearts. You have great choice in model kits mate! Have a good one :)

@stevenblackwell4903

Жыл бұрын

As an AD tho, the 404 was a wonderful engine.💕

39 years Air Force and was a F-111 crew chief in the early 80's, started on O2-A's n the late 70's and ended on F-16 C/D's in 2019 and I still believe the Tomcat is the best looking aircraft of the modern era.

@johnyoungs7453

2 жыл бұрын

It is a sweetheart...!! :-)

@DEADorALIVEkayaking

2 жыл бұрын

Air Force brat, here...while I thought, and still think, the Tomcat was a really good looking airplane, NOTHING we've ever built is even close to as sexy as the Phantoms, in all its' variants! That thing could be sitting on the tarmac, and looked like it was already doing 1000 mph and was looking for something to kill!

@johnyoungs7453

2 жыл бұрын

@@DEADorALIVEkayaking Are you talking about Phantoms or Tomcats? You kinda "switched horses in the middle of the stream", here...??

@DEADorALIVEkayaking

2 жыл бұрын

@@johnyoungs7453 Both, actually...the Tomcat was a really really good looking airplane, but those Phantoms...man, they were just flat sexy! :)

@mintint4965

2 жыл бұрын

Tomcat is the most beautiful aircraft ever. Better looking than the Phantom IMO

Thanks Ward for the political history lesson on our fighter aircraft. I joined the Navy in 1962 and did jets in basic training but chose many engines in advanced because I spent a day on the carrier. I became bored, lost, several misadventures and hungry. I could not imagine 6 months at sea, I would have been demoted to E-1 in short fashion. As it was, I got to fly the P-3 as PPC with my own crew, as a boot J.G.. My mission was patrolling Waikiki beach for socially acceptable bikinis. It was a tough job but somebody had to do it. I ended up with a 36 year career in the airlines with the 747 left seat for the last 15 years. A nice view. Bottom line, please keep up the great website, I have been a subscriber for many a year. It is educational for those of us that were in and those who envy same. The F14 is still the best looking bird in the Navy. Blue side up.

I just wish that every aviation commentator was as lucid and interesting even down to understanding a series of models numbers and comparisons.Thank you.

You omit two important activities that had a major impact on the decision to move Naval aviation in its current direction. The first was the Congressionally directed study called Carrier Airwing 2000 which was done at CNA in 1990 with a supporting paper from NAVAIR titled "Aircraft Carrier Requirements for a Post Cold War World" and the "From the Sea" maritime strategy document. Both the CV Airwing Study and From the Sea postulated that there would no peer or near peer competitor until well Into the 21st Century and as a result the fleet air defense problem was less severe and there would be only a limited Naval deep strike requirement that could not be handled by cruise missiles. Then in 1992 NAVAIR did a study on future fighter/attack aircraft. There were three alternatives considered. What became the F/A-18EF, the FI4D + F14 QS and just build F-18C/Ds as gap fillers until what F-35, orginally JAST then JSF could be developed . The other two alternatives included a 5th Gen fighter-Attack aircraft. The least cost and least capable option was Option 3. Option 2 was the most capability but much cost more than Option 3. Option 1 was the least bang for the buck but was chosen anyway. VADM Bill Bowes, who was AIR-00 at the time explained that after the failure if the A-12, A-6 rewing, P-7 and P-3 Update IV that Congress would not give the Navy money to start a 5th Generation fighter until Naval aviation produce something and that Super Hornet was the best way to do that.

As a retired Army guy, I understood the value and appreciated the design of Grumman aircraft and admired the thinking behind it all! But, how to forgive those terrible politicians who imposed their 'better judgment' on the Troops, Sailors, Marines, and Airmen?

@curiousgeorge5992

2 жыл бұрын

Gallows

@only5186

2 жыл бұрын

Childs play compared to what they do now! If you listen closely you can hear the death rattle of America

@bruhbruh13968

2 жыл бұрын

Forgiveness at the bottom of a rope on a street pole

@williammolder8372

2 жыл бұрын

Something about the Cheney family !!!! If he's not costing men and lives in the military??? She's costing US taxpayer money on socialism!!!! Tomcat was an amazing plane it should still be in service, according to some of the pilots I know!!

@braith117

Жыл бұрын

It's no worse than other branches making one another keep machines around that they didn't want. See the Navy and battleships and the Air Force and the A-10.

A naval version of the F15 strike eagle would have been a huge money saver. Interesting that you mention how Cheney was financially involved in Grumman’s competition…I always thought he had sticky fingers and was dirty, explaining how he became as rich as he did.

@jamesjross

9 ай бұрын

F15 is the most successful plane ever (and still going)... But the super hornet is basically them making up for that mistake

@towcub

3 ай бұрын

I don’t know that it would be cost effective to make the F-15 capable of landing on an aircraft carrier (more than once).

What a great piece of work. This might be my favorite talk/video on the F-14 and its possible continued service. Thank you!

So energizing, and then the reality of military aviation acquisition and related politics. You can't fix stupid. Thanks Ward, it's a privilege to hear your stories, and analysis.

Ward: Very interesting discussion on “Why We Didn't Get the Super Tomcat-21.” There is one more very important program development that weighed heavily in the evolution that was not mentioned. From 1979 through 1983 I served as a Radar Intercept Officer (RIO) in the same squadron in which you later served: VF-102 Diamondbacks at NAS Oceana. Following VF-102, from 1983 to 1986 I was at VX-4, NAS Pt. Mugu, CA. After the Navy went to work for Northrop (now Northrop/Grumman) in 1987. At the time, Northrop was teamed with McDonnell Douglas in development of the Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) and the Navy Advanced Tactical Fighter (NATF). The two of us - Northrop and McDonnell Douglas - were in competition against Lockheed, Boeing, and General Dynamics to design and build two replacement fighters for both the Air Force’s F-15 and the Navy’s F-14. Both teams built two flyable vehicles - the Lockheed team built and flew the YF-22 and we built and flew the YF-23. What is not widely known are the details involving the Navy variants the public never saw. I was the senior RIO on the program for the Northrop/McDonnell team. While the public saw our YF-23 we built for the Air Force, the details for our Navy ATF were never publicly released and I assume remain classified. I can tell you, though, our aircraft looked similar to the YF-23 the public saw. The big design drivers at that time were low observability, interoperability with the AAAM missile - the Phoenix replacement, the ability to super cruise, sensor fusion both internal and external, and a significant reduction in maintainability costs. Our Navy ATF resembled the Air Force YF-23 we flight demonstrated but was designed with both a pilot and an RIO. It had an electrically scanned array (ESA) radar, larger internal weapons bay to accommodate the AAAM, had a much larger thrust to weight ratio than the F-14D, and incorporated a very low radar and infrared signature. I personally flew thousands of hours in flight simulation. It was an exciting time to be sure. But at source selection in late April 1991, the Air Force - the lead service on the program - chose the Lockheed team’s YF-22 for the Air Force. DoD had billed the program as “two aircraft with one contractor for both services” (like the F-4 Phantom and the TFX) but what occurred was what many had feared: the Air Force and Navy split on their selections. The Navy pulled out of the program - which infuriated the Air Force because it dramatically drove up their costs. The day it was announced the Navy was out of the program, McDonnell Douglas issued pink slips to all of the design engineers I had worked with for several years. So sad. In the debates that followed, the Navy planners decided that low observability was not so-much the design driver as it was in the Air Force community. Although not expressly “low observable,” what eventually transpired was the development of the F/A-18 Super Hornet as you have described by the same two contractors that lost the NATF program: Northrop (now Northrop/Grumman) and McDonnell Douglas (now Boeing). I still have a couple of coffee mugs in my china hutch depicting our NATF on the side that “disappears” when hot coffee is poured into it. I gave away boxes and boxes of these at our Northrop booth at Tailhook 1990. Stan Harley “Hawg”

Wow !! I was born Feb 14th 1961 and am a USAF Veteran. I had no idea this was a thing. Great info ty.

The Growler deserves a shout out as well... talk about a force multiplier.

I often wondered why such a great airframe was discontinued. I asked an engineer who had worked at Raytheon if he knew why...he replied with one word: "politics".

We have an awesome military but imagine what we could have if the Admirals and Generals were able to build the forces needed to meet the current threats instead of letting politicians choose the designs that personally makes them the most money. To hell with those guys; especially Dick "Shotgun" Cheney. I was pissed when they mothballed the F-14. That fighter was the poster child around the world for American Badassery. First time posting. Love your channel Ward. Keep it up sir.

@LRRPFco52

2 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately, politicians are put into office by corporate interests much larger than defense, and a lot of those corporate interests share industrial supply with the top 20 industries in the US. Say you want to build a next generation super airframe out of carbon composites. Alcoa aluminum might have something to say about that, and they have far more pull in Congress than one of the “lowly” big defense contractors. Study the top 20 industries in the US. Defense isn’t one of them.

@Texas240

2 жыл бұрын

It's the same pencil pushers who didn't want ground troops to have modern, comfortable, capable boots because they "didn't look as good" in garrison use.

@LRRPFco52

2 жыл бұрын

@@Texas240 Boots went the total opposite direction from spit and polish once the desert boots and authorized alternate list was approved. Back in the '90s, they spec'd out a more press shop friendly BDU set, and went away from the comfortable, articulated knee BDUs with bellowed pocket blouse to flat pockets so garritroopers could have them starched easily, even though by regulation they were forbidden from being starched. The uniforms that came after that with ACU and now went back to a baggy functionality. The most comfortable were the OG107 Jungle Fatigues with very relaxed fit and functional pockets.

What an amazingly well done video. Thanks for this history lesson complete with photos!

This KZread channel is a great source for the history of one of the most iconic military aircraft of the post-WW2 era. Very informative, great content!

As a retired enlisted AT, and supporting VF-32 as a tech rep on USS Harry S Truman, I'll never understand why the government killed the F-14 program. The Tomcat, which I first saw in Memphis at an airshow while I was in A-school, was the reason I went to the Jolly Rogers. Watching those Tomcats soaring over Millington was the best thing I had ever seen. I'm guessing that many of you have no idea what I'm talking about. It was a long time ago.

12:08 Thats buno 159600, the longest serving Tomcat. Delivered in 1975 as a Blk 85 F-14A, became the 5th re-manufactured F-14D(R) in 1994, retired in 2006.

I could give a 2-hour long speech on how much more deficient structurally the Legacy and Supers are over the Tomcat. It’s night and day.

Ward thank you for all your history. I was a Grumman ASD field service mod team technician at Miramar and Pt Mugu. Worked on a bunch of the updates you speak about. Great memories.

A great recap of the F-14 story. I was closely involved with the beginning, and until your video didn't know the end. I was a LCDR RIO instructor in VF=121 in the late 60's and was asked to visit Hughes aircraft for fleet inputs on how the modify the F-111 B weapons system for the newly planned F-14. This soon involved more and more time, and I ended up getting orders to the F-14 program office at NAVAIR. It's hard to believe today, but the program manager was only a Navy Captain (Mike Ames). The only other blue suit was the weapon system manager an EDO CDR. Engine procurement was managed by the USAF at Wright-Pat. This might help to explain the TF-30 thump-bang problem that we experienced during the first deployment on Enterprise, which was a big surprise to those of us in the Fleet. In hindsight, someone knew of this problem. I used to get F-4 flight time at Pax River and the Pax service test pilots were leery of this engine even before the F-14 first flight. After the first F-14 crash, the Washington Post seemed to make it a personal vendetta to cancel the program and a flag officer (Swoose Snead) took over the program before fleet introduction. I was lucky to be assigned to the VF1/VF2 fleet introduction team at Miramar which was loaded with future Astronauts and Flag officers. Later on, I was again fortunate and was honored to command VF-24. Alas that was my last flying tour and involvement with the F-14. Joel Graffman (Capt USN RET)

@richterscale4625

2 жыл бұрын

Just to make things explicit, every program manager for every NAVAIR program office is a Navy Captain.

@transkryption

2 жыл бұрын

you loaded Flag Officers and Astronauts? like into bomb bays and Weapons hardpoints? sounds fun. Dr Strangelove style skydiving! yeeehaww! Must be good for morale. The Admiral aint no pussy! he's just one of the lads... yep he wants a jump... You millitary boys crack me up!

@harrymarso7512

2 жыл бұрын

L

@Legion-xq8eo

Жыл бұрын

Thank you for your service Capt Joel!!

When I was a kid and obsessed with military aircraft in the mid-80's I would read all the stuff I could find about them. Unfortunately, while I read the info, it was just gobbledygook in my brain as I don't understand any of the math or how the numbers of anything work with any of this stuff. SO, now, when Ward tells these stories they make sense!

@davidregier1463

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, this is exactly how I feel -- stored a bunch of letters and numbers and manufacturer names like memorizing the stats on a baseball card but not knowing enough about the game. Ward's teaching us all the inside baseball knowledge.

Thanks Ward, this channel is really well done and fascinating. As a former Aerospace Engineer who graduated in the early 80's, your operational insights into the F-14 and its potential successor are brilliant and fascinating to hear. Please keep it coming!

I think I've watched this video 3 or 4 times. Every time I am impressed and in awe of what could have been. Thank you.

Had the opportunity to witness the public introduction of the Tomcat at the 1973 Paris Airshow. Being the assistant to a professional photographer working for Aviation Week we had unlimited access to the aircraft and Grumman’s pavilion. Still have Grummans promotional documents along with AW’s publication featuring the Tomcat on the cover.

Great info. I was in VF 21 from '89-92, we really liked where the Tomcat was going with the GE engines and avionics upgrade. Unfortunately, after '89 the Tomcat wasn't viewed as a post-cold war air superiority option. They tried to convert into a dual role fighter/attack (bomber) like the F/A 18. I remember being on the flightline at Miramar and Atsugi watching the F-18 maintenance crews leaving after an 8-hour shift, while the F-14 maintenance crews were working 3 8-hour shifts or 12 on/off to keep up with maintenance.

Excellent. That’s the final word on a venerable platform. And great insights into complexities of military strategy, planning and execution.

Excellent informational presentation. Thank you.

Great summary! Man, I miss the F-14D and its capabilities, especially its TARPS capability. I was an Army "customer" on the ground in Afghanistan early on and the support we received from our brothers and sisters in Naval Aviation was second to none and extremely responsive to our needs.

@timcotton1782

2 жыл бұрын

TARPS pods were important, but they were a giant pain in the backside to maintain.

By far the best explanation I have ever heard or read about how the Navy ended up with the Super Hornet over the Tomcat. Well done sir.

I was stationed at Strike Test Pax River in the mid 90’s and had plenty of exposure to the Tomcat DFCS variant and Hornet/Super Hornet as a PR. Not a lot of pilots like the DFCS variant but has a lot of love for the original Tomcat. It was cool to see the old NSATS logo on that Super Hornet. As always, great videos!

Your videos are awesome. I was in the Army, but always had an interest planes. Back in the 90s there was a company that made binders with pages of facts on different aircraft. They updated the information as they got it, and I remember looking forward to getting those pages. Your videos are like that binder, but with real experience and explained in a real-world and interesting way. Keep up the videos, man.

a senator kept badgering Adm. Connolly about adding more thrust to make the F-111 suitable. Finally, Connolly said "Senator, there is not enough thrust in all of Chrisendom to make this plane suitable." afterwards, Connolly was convinced that he had sabotaged his carreer. PBS Special. it was wonderful . Thanks Ward.

A friend of mine that I served with went to JTAC school training with VF-31. The SEALs loved the F-14…. considered it a force multiplier. Imagine if ST21 was in the game for those guys. Turns out the F-15EX is as close as we’ll get to the ST21.

@J_Caban

2 жыл бұрын

Why would SEALS care about an air superiority fighter?

@aaronbethea7234

2 жыл бұрын

@@J_Caban Because of the FAC-A role it had late in it's service life.

@Bat21bravo

2 жыл бұрын

@@J_Caban snake eaters care about eating livers & cutting off heads underwater/thread.

@J_Caban

2 жыл бұрын

@@Bat21bravo ???

@aaronbethea7234

2 жыл бұрын

@@seanmurphy7011 True... but I'm sure you cared about how long they could remain on station and how well the aircrews we're trained.

Awesome vid. So much info and history packed in about the Tomcat. Thank you.

One of the interesting things about the Super Tomcat design is that the enlarged leading edge root extensions (LERX) looks very similar to what Russia has designed into their 5th gen SU-57 which along with thrust vectoring helps make it highly maneuverable aircraft.

@kenchen704

2 жыл бұрын

Thrust vectoring is strictly impractical for the Navy. There is no room on the carrier for that kind of maintenance for 80+ fighters.

@FallenPhoenix86

2 жыл бұрын

@@kenchen704 When was the last time a carrier actually went to sea with 80+ fighters embarked? Typically its closer to 50.

@JoeGambill-AdvMarktr

2 жыл бұрын

Correction : The Russian SU-57 looks like Tomcat LERX.

@jamesa.7604

2 жыл бұрын

OMG! A Tomcat with Thrust Vectoring Capability and Supercruise would be one Very Sweet Lethal Bird!

@kenchen704

2 жыл бұрын

@@FallenPhoenix86 if you let the Nimitz class carriers go to all out war in Vietnam again it will definitely be 80+, pretending to be smart.

Fascinating, Ward. Thanks. You've also intensified my distaste for Cheney. His parents knew what they were doing when they named him "Dick." Interesting the similarity between the Rapier and the A-5.

@c2dvr

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah old tricky D operates on FE.And the E stands for everybody.

@bigbaddms

2 жыл бұрын

What about his daughter? Maybe even worse.

Really excellent report...again!

Great video thanks for all the detailed information

Amazing story. F-14 is my all time fav fighter jet. I was sad when I heard it was being phased out.

Mr. Ward, I am so grateful to have found this channel. Back in the mid seventies my older brother was a navigator in the F14, however my brother was in the Marines! I only recently learned that the Marines didn't purchase any F14's. That new knowledge has left me in a quagmire as you can tell. He is no longer with us as he perished in a plane crash in 76 at Cherry Point N.C. It was not any type of a fighter but some kind of a transport plane. I remember when he got to Cherry Point he expressed to us how happy he was that he wasn't flying the harriers there because they were crashing alot. So I wonder what would have happened to his career if he had lived? Would he have been reassigned to the Navy? Oh by the way,he got his wings in Pensacola Florida. Any comments on this from you would be greatly appreciated.

Very informative. Thankyou. Respect from Australia

Awesome treatise of the subject Ward!

I was incredibly sad when the Tomcat got put out to pasture. It and the F-15 were always my favorite combat aircraft.

@decimated550

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah the f16 is like a peewee plane, and the f18 is just ugly , angular, it's wings are not even swept.

@Gentleman...Driver

2 жыл бұрын

@@decimated550 F16 is the most successfull Gen 4 fighter ever build. 😉 And for reasons. Cost-Performance is on a sweetspot. It is easy to maintain, there are enough cheap spare parts on the market, there are modernization kits available for most of the airframes/versions. It can be equipped for multiple roles. It ist a good dog fighter. It is a durable work horse. Sometimes its not best to go big. Operation costs are going to explode.

@Gentleman...Driver

2 жыл бұрын

Correction: with over 2,200 units in active service the F-16 is the most successfull jet fighter EVER build.

@v0id683

2 жыл бұрын

@@Gentleman...Driver meanwhile the tomcat was absurdly expensive to buy and maintain. Not only that the maintenance times were much much longer and the aircraft wasn’t built around future upgradability in mind

@Gentleman...Driver

2 жыл бұрын

@@v0id683 Yes, and I remember that the wear and tear of the F14, with those swept wings, was horrible. Especially on the navy versions which had to do the carrier landings. Its a cool looking thing, no question. But you have to fund the mess. Thats the reality.

Loved this episode ! I don't watch many video's about aircraft but have a real soft spot for my Tomcats ! I served active 72' - 77' & was on Ranger as I.C. // We were getting some fine details on the Tomcats worked out as the huge payload capability was showing where the few flaws were , caused by arrest landings . Biggest issue we had was shock absorbers exploding upon the arrest. After many sleepless nights with top engineers & techs building assemblies , we finally had a shock absorber that could be reliable with heavy loads on the craft. The duty was memorable & I wish my injuries were able to heal so I could have stayed on the flight observation deck every night , watching my Tomcats take off in the dark & then scaring the ......... out of me as I prayed for their safe arrest in the pea soup that arrived more often than I would have liked .......... I had opportunity to greet a pilot in Officers country after a very scary arrest in pea soup & I finally got his face to admit some blood into it as I said " You Impressed me greatly tonight with that landing ; time for a shot of Johnny Walker & a Snooze " ............

I had heard a story on the swing wing center box structures showing signs of fatigue failures that were not economically feasible to repair and that was another reason to not continue with that design configuration.

Man I could listen to you talk about F-14s all day long, in fact I have. Would have been so cool to see the 21. Cool happy ending in there about them ordering more F-14s, I was under the impression the were no longer being fielded. The F-14 will always be my first love in terms of aircraft, fell deeply in love with it as a young child, really wish I would have went into a career like yours. Mad props and respect to you.

So looking forward to this ward. Really looking forward to another episode talking about Iranian F-14A’s

@TheOriginalCoda

2 жыл бұрын

I’m waiting for news that the Iranians are scrapping their remaining F-14s so the Yanks can’t get hold of them and put them back into service 😂

@RCAvhstape

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheOriginalCoda Best news would be to hear that Navy Seals brought some Tomcat pilots on a raid and stole the F-14s back from Iran lol.

@merafirewing6591

3 ай бұрын

​@@RCAvhstape imagine they stole all the Iranian F-14s that can fly and destroy the ones that couldn't.

I liked the picture of Ranger when talking about the all-Grumman airwing. I recently received an e-mail that talked about when Ranger was virtually all Grumman. We had a lot of Grumman aircraft when I was aboard from 1968-'70. Grumman really knew what they were doing when it came to building carrier based warplanes.

The F-14 Tomcat, it seems to me, had great developmental potential, especially with better engines, but also much more like you said.

Thanks for the great vids,keep it up.I much appreciate your service.

Looking back I'm so grateful to have seen the F-14 Tomcat fly at the airshow at Cecil Field in Jacksonville FL in 1987?. I was in my college's flight program so I went with my classmates to the airshow. The F-14 Tomcat is visibly a BIG fighter jet and I loved the look and jet engine noise it made! The Tomcat took off, went vertical till it was out of sight in the clear sky. It had a thunderous ground shaking sound doing it. The Air Force brought a F-15 and later did the same thing. You could tell right away the F-15 climbed MUCH faster than the F-14 did but the F-15 wasn't as cool with all the thunderous ground shaking! Lol! Neither F-14 or the F-15 got the complete attention of that crowd that the US Marines AV-8 Harrier received later when it did its demonstration of vertical takeoff/landing/flying backwards/sideways/accelerating from hovering.

Now, I'm not saying that the Super Tomcat-21 would've solved all of our problems, but it would be ironic if the Navy starts asking for a large, long-range fighter to carry a big hypersonic missile mounted under the center of the fuselage to counter land-based hypersonic anti-ship missile sites...

@kdrapertrucker

2 жыл бұрын

That's already happening.

@jwenting

2 жыл бұрын

nah, they're going to get a "mission module" for the LCS, which will then never sail because it's impossible to get to work properly.

@2hedz77

Жыл бұрын

I dunno...any Tomcat is woefully outdated now. But could have seen maybe 10 more years up to 2016 maybe. Today it's about stealth and unmanned aircraft.

@StGene22494

Жыл бұрын

@@2hedz77 Yeah, by this point the Tomcat would have been a little long in the tooth, but I look at the value a two-man cockpit and endurance brings to the table and I wonder if it might be worth it. Have the pilot concentrate on flying the plane and keeping the Tomcat away from SAM sites, and the RIO manage the drones.

@2hedz77

Жыл бұрын

@@StGene22494 I agree, the value of a two man cockpit is very underestimated in my opinion

Sir: Many thanks for this amazing presentation. Watched this several times, always learn more. Respect.

I was a jet engine mechanic on the A's. Love those planes.

Interesting information about the Tomcat. I am retired Air Force and some of the Navy planes seem to be better than the Air Force planes at times. I wish the Air Force would get the F-35B since it can operate from short runways or if a runway and taxiway are bombed out. But I digress. It is interesting to note that one of the reasons the Air Force accepted the F-16 over the F-17 was that the F-111 production had ended and that General Dynamics (now Lockheed Martin) already had the new production line ready. The F-17 was superior but did not have flyby wire. The Navy got the better end of the deal by taking the F-17 and turning it into the F-18. Again great video.

@MustangsCanTurnToo

2 жыл бұрын

In no way was the F-17 better than the F-16 🤣

@johnyoungs7453

2 жыл бұрын

Sir, the reason that Navy planes are generally regarded as "better" than USAF planes (by the USAF, themselves...) is simply because of the way they're designed. They're more rugged. They're expected, over the years of their service lives, to literally "slam down" on the deck of a carrier in what can best be described as an "intentionally controlled crash" and then be expected to fly again. Ever look at the main landing gear of an F-18 Hornet..?? It's massive..! For a reason..! The entire wing and fuselage structure is designed for this "abuse"..! When the Navy decided to use the British BAE Hawk as their next trainer, they had to beef it up considerably. Stouter landing gear, beefier fuselage and wings. And a bigger engine with more power to make up for the increased weight. With the exception of the F-15 Eagle, virtually all Navy planes used by the Air Force have performed very well. Even the old and loved F-4 Phantom, in it's various renditions, all still used a tail hook - thereby saving more than a few flight crews and aircraft as a result. Food for thought..!!

@billstuart8481

Жыл бұрын

@@johnyoungs7453 Obviously turbo air head has never been on a carrier deck and felt a landing.

Such a fascinating video. Really appreciate all your insite thanks.

Great video! Former Marine Hornet airframer and civ contractor at VX23. Did two cruises aboard the Nimitz CVW-11 along with, now, VFA-41. I have always been a fan of the tomcat since I was a kid.. probably because of Top Gun!

I am so glad you mentioned the naming link between Adm Connolly, Grumman the F-14. I saw him talk about that whole evolution on the F-14 episode of either Discovery WIngs or Great Planes.

@carlmontney7916

2 жыл бұрын

Both were great shows that I wish they'd bring back!

Fantastic video! Thank you so much for putting forth the truth! Keep up the great work!

Super interesting. Answered so many questions I had about the process of designing, procuring, and fielding military aircraft. Makes me proud to be an American as we have so many smart people in the military and in the engineering of military equipment and weaponry.

I have some old Bendix vacuum tubes. Those things are built like a tank. They weigh 2x more than a similar sized vacuum tube. The support discs are ceramic inside the Bendix tubes. Support discs and tabs in regular tubes are paper thin mica. The support rods in a Bendix tube are over 50%-150% thicker than regular tube support rods. The plates are heavier. They are all rated for high G dynamic loads, higher G shock loads and very high altitudes. They may be designed for RADAR displays and RADAR transmission, but they also work great for audio.

@svenschwingel8632

2 жыл бұрын

Lots of musicians and audiophiles literally hunt for MILSPEC tubes for that exact reason. These guys are also willing to pay quite the money for that stuff.

@Satchmoeddie

2 жыл бұрын

@@svenschwingel8632 I got mine back when the getting was good plus I could go down to the boneyard on jobs and score things like 5881s or TT21s off B52s for free. As long as I wasn't studying the RADAR controlled steering landing gear circuitry they didn't care. The TT21s were in the glide slope part anyway. I have no idea if any B52s still use any tubes or not. I think they might still use BWOs or other traveling wave tubes for RADAR jamming. New Gallium arsenide RF transistors have some impressive bandwidth and power but there are still a lot of older systems out there. Is it hardened for an E pulse? Who knows. There are maybe two labs that can attempt to study that. Los Alamos is one.

The TCF-14 is my favorite plane of all time! The 1st time I saw them was in the movie The Final Countdown & I was in love with that plane. So, when Top Gun came out I was even more excited to see that movie. My only complaint was I didn't see enough of the plane. I grew up in a small town (now a part of the city of Miramichi.) called Chatham NB Canada. In the mid-late 80's there was an Air Force Base in Chatham which was home to the 416 Lynx VF101-Voodo squadron. There was different times over the years that 2-4 F-14's would come in & play with the Voodo's & I mean the F-14 was playing! It was awesome seeing 2 F-14's going up against as many as 6 F-101's! It wasn't a F-14 against a Japanese Zero, but the Voodo's were so out of the Top Cats league! I was wondering however, if you ever did any research on the CF-105 Avro Arrow. By all accounts it seemed like a plane that was far ahead of it's time & I believe Avro was going to add a model for a Aircraft Carrier for the RAF. Love your videos sir & Thank You from a Canadian for your service for keeping us safe as well! Cheers!

looked at the whole thing ...loved the information...so clear...I could listen all day at the way he told the story and filled in the blanks over the years about the famous Tomcat.