This video was supposed to be 20 minutes long. But during research I gathered so much information that I added "some" content - ca. 30% of the video - in the past two days before release. Funny, isn't it? Exploring the origins, rise and legacy of the Chionites, Kidarites, Alchons and Hephtalites, this fourth episode also concludes our mini-series about the history of the Huns. This time, we delve deep into archeological findings, numismatic research and - like with Europe last time - explore non-steppe history of the Yuezhi, Bactrians, Sogdians, Persians and even Indians. I know that there is much more to tell about the Huns. But since July, I have provided an overview with more than 100 minutes of runtime in total, and deem this to be worthy for anyone interested in their historical outlines. At the very end of the video, there is a preview for the next video series, Season III of the overarching "History of Turkic States" project. And with that, we return to the very core of this ordeal, the one goal I had in mind when starting Khan's Den nearly four years ago ...

@auraajah3072

7 ай бұрын

Good job Tank's

@muratyucel9011

7 ай бұрын

can you give me a link.. I can contribute to your hard work and great videos …

@lbsears5950

7 ай бұрын

Whats the song at the 30 minute mark?

@herrero4270

7 ай бұрын

Not funny, but good. I could use one hour more.

@KhansDen

6 ай бұрын

If you'd rather watch a channel of which the fundament is religiously motivated, be my guest and look somewhere else @@troyhailey

This channel is a gem. Shining a light on the Turkic peoples history - something long overlooked, but obviously of central importance to the founding of the modern world. The main problem with most other youtube Turk History is a desire by authors to politicize it, make it about the glory of one modern nation or another (often, but not always Turkey - which is a shame as most Turks I met are beautiful people). I think they miss the point - to these Turkish nomads such a nation would just be prey. That menace this channel conveys exceptionally well.

@user-ne2zr2bo7l

7 ай бұрын

Так Хунны не тюрки а восточнокавказцы.. т.е. Дагестанцы.. до этого их называли Масагетами, Саксмасагетами, Готами, Даками.. Они жили по всей евроазии как хозяева земли.. У них много прислуги было, у каждой семьи от сотни семей прислуги и более.. они заставляли слуг разговаривать на тюркском языке.. но сами были кавказцами..

@ILYAS-7

6 ай бұрын

​@@user-ne2zr2bo7l 😂😂Да, По вашему сказку, вы ещё победили и Чингизхана и Тамерлана ))

@user-ne2zr2bo7l

6 ай бұрын

@@ILYAS-7 ваши сказки не читал, но по нашей истории, сам можешь проверить, как манголы пришли на кавказ, и не смогли пройти через восточный кавказ и вынужденно ушли через дарьяльское ушелье .. А на счет тамерлана проклятого, история написана.. изза того что Даги окали ему сомое большое сопротивление он с особой жестокости подверг Дагов, особенно Ариев, Даков.. да и самое большое сражение в истории человечества произошел на территории Дагестана.. где столкнулись многомиллионная армия тамерлана и армия золотой орды.. на берегах терека это сражение было.. Где был разбит тахтамыш, и после этого орда не востановилась.. Когда темерлан пошел на север на московское княжество в Дагестане уничтожили все его гарнизоны и всех мангол с их прислугой тюрками.. И тамерлан был вынужден повернуть назад , понимая что ему обратную дорогу перекрыто.. а одно из сражений возглавляла девушка Парту Патима.. Об этом многр написано, и тут как у вас сказок нет.. Почти все жители самарканда и округи были покоренными народами манголом тамерланом и его армией наемников.. всегда бунтовали, грабили тамерлановское.. так что кому то из ныне живуших на тех землях если кажется что это узбеки, таджики, или киргизы это тамерлановцы, то успокойтесь.. Сам проклятый тамерлан был манголом, а его армия из наемников состояло из всей евроазии..

@Madiar99

6 ай бұрын

@@ILYAS-7 🤣👍🏼

@hudai7994

3 ай бұрын

@@user-ne2zr2bo7l Ulan bi karar verin Hunlar moğolmu iranmı slavmı kafkasyalımı? her kafadan bir ses çıkıyo

While its true that there was some controversy about the origin of the Huns, the consensus after recent decades is that they were Turks of Oghuric affiliation, mostly based on credible studies confirming that the vast majority of attested Hunnic names, as well as all Hunnic successor clans are of evident Oghur Turkic origin. All Hunnic tribes (entirely Oghur Turkic) : Akatziri, Onogurs, Utigurs, Sabirs, Bulgars, Saragurs, Kutrigurs, Barsils, Balanjars Recorded Hunnic names of Turkic origin : Aigan = moon prince; from Turkic aï & can Alp Ilutuer / Ilteber = heroic chieftain; from Turkic alp & iltäbär Althias = six; from Turkic Alti Akkagas = white rock; from Turkic ak & kayač Atakam = elder shaman; from Turkic ata & kam Balach = calf; from Turkic Malaq Berik = strong; from Turkic Berık Basik = governor; from Turkic Bârsiğ Bleda = wise; from Turkic Bildä Bochas = either gullet; from Turkic Boğuz; or bull, from Buqa Dengizich = ocean-like, heavenly; from Turkic teɲez & dêɲri; or, more simply, great lake Donat / Donatu = horse; from Turkic Yonat Edeco = good; from Turkic Ädgü Ellac = to rule; from Turkic el & lä Emmedzur = horse lord; from Turkic Ämäcur Eskam / Esqam = companion of the shaman; from Turkic Eŝkam Hereka / Kreka = pure princess; from Turkic Arïqan Ernakh / Hernac = small man, heroic man; from Turkic Ernäk Iliger = prince man; from Turkic ilig & är Karadach = black mountain; from Turkic Qaradağ Karaton = black cloak; from Turkic Qarâton Kursik = either noble; from Turkic Kürsiğ; or belt-bearer, from Qurŝiq Kutilzis = blessed herald; from Turkic kut & elči Mundzuk = bead; from Turkic Munčuq Oebarsius / Aybars = moon leopard, from Turkic Aïbârs; or dun leopard, from oy & bars Oldogan / Odolgan = either red falcon; from Turkic al & dogan; or chubby, from Tolgun Oktar / Uptar = brave; from Turkic Öctär Ruga / Rua = wise man; from Turkic Ögä Turgun = still/calm; from Turkic Turkun Uldin = six; from Turkic Alti Zolban = shepherd star; from Turkic Čolpan.

@robertomassa731

7 ай бұрын

Great!!! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

@user-cg2tw8pw7j

7 ай бұрын

Shapur II: Man, you are strong. Can you help me against the Romans?

@nvanguy6868

5 ай бұрын

Čopab čoban can also be iranic

@precursors

4 ай бұрын

Entirely oghur turkic?? 😂😂 Source: trust me bro, credible studies

The reason that the Türks and other Turkic nomads were formidable warriors was that they were horse-archers. A horse-archer specifically denotes a mounted warrior armed with a bow who can shoot from horseback while riding. The Turkic nomadic warriors as well as the Mongols used the composite bow, which was made of horn, wood, and sinew. The composite bow was more accurate and had a better range and rate of fire than muskets and early firearms. The tactical principles of the Turkic horse-archers were based on the combination of fire power and mobility. yhe nomadic horse-archers shot in volleys, weakening the enemy before they charged. Ideally, they practiced "fire power in movement" like modern armies.Other things being equal, the horse-archers were often almost unbeatable on the open battlefields. Against them, sedentary soldiers were often helpless until the development of efficient battlefield handguns, including the repeating firearms (the firearms that could be fired repeatedly before being manually reloaded) in the seventeenth century.

@arystanbeck914

7 ай бұрын

Actually, it is not necessarily true. Gokturks and Sarmatians are believed to employ more of a heavy cavalry type of warfare, using lances more than bows. Remember, Gokturks were blacksmiths originally, so they used heavy armour (laminar or lamellar, I don't remember which one exactly). So did Oyrats later in 17 and 18 centuries.

@herrero4270

7 ай бұрын

@@arystanbeck914 They used BOTH kinds of army units. Light cavalry bow archers used as described above and, once the ranks of the enemy were broken, they used heavy cavalry force for the melee.

@arystanbeck914

7 ай бұрын

@@herrero4270 not necesserily all armies. Yes, Mongol armies had different kinds, Tamerlane's army had many different kinds, but some peoples, especially in tribal warfares had one or very few different kinds.

@herrero4270

7 ай бұрын

@@arystanbeck914 Which "tribal" warfares? Pechenegs, Cumans, Tatars, Nogai, Manchu, et., etc., etc., all had diffrent units. The "tribes" weren't divided by any kind of weapon specialization, since all the nobility was used as heavy cavalry, and the lower classes as mounted archers. It was a mater of wealth. Every nomad nation had their own nobility, and the rest was common people.

@arystanbeck914

7 ай бұрын

@@herrero4270 how can you generalize the same things to all Turkic or Nomadic peoples? What nobility? We have so little data about them we don't even know what kind of dwellings they used and you somehow know what their army was like. Probably 90% of the time their military campaigns were either one Turkic tribe fighting another or one tribe raiding some settled societies. In a tribe you don't have "nobility", all people are relatives. Only a great leader like Attila or Chingis Khan or Temir could unite all tribes and muster armies where there were several types of military. The rest only fought the way that was the most convenient to them. Even Oyrats (Dzhungars) of 18th century had an army that was predominantly one type - heavy cavalry. They fought and lost to Manchu who ruled China at the time and who used bowmen.

Hunas were top patrons of Buddhism which was the second most popular pre-Islamic religion of Turks, practiced by Qocho Uighurs, Khalaj Turk Shahis & Zunbils, Tokhara Yabghus and even some Göktürk Khagans

@user-jw7di2ef7d

7 ай бұрын

Lie. They had a worldview (not a religion) called -> Tengrism

@Koorush_bazurg

7 ай бұрын

Hunas destroyed Buddhism in north west India

@Frikssskingg

7 ай бұрын

Buddhism? *TENGRISM

@pasha542

7 ай бұрын

@@user-jw7di2ef7d Türklerin yegane inanci gök tanri inancidir... Fuck islam

@benjamindo8142

6 ай бұрын

i like how they're calling you a liar, meanwhile they dont realize you're actually correct lmao

There aren't many channels about older history of Turks, but this channel is a help for people like me, who are interested in learning history of Turks, Love from Pakistan❤

The term "Hun" most likely derives from the turkic term "küŋ " which simply means people or nation. Don't confuse with "kün = sun or day". Most of the endonyms of many nations have just the meaning "people, nation, man or human". Even today in the mongolian language, there is the word khuun with the same meaning. And although in the turkish language this word lives untill today with exactly the same meaning in the doublet "el gün". For example when you say -el'e gün'e karşı rezil olmak- it means -getting emberassed to the land and to the people-. You can even hear it in the song "Kiss Kiss" from Tarkan😅. Hsiung-nu = Küŋlüg ? = of the nation Hun, Khun, Kun, Hyün, Chion etc. In the minute 14:55 there is a Kidarite coin with the inscription "King of the Oglar Huns" I've seen this for the first time, but it excited me very much. What is "Oglar" ? It is turkic for tribes or clans. Oguz/Ogur and Oglar are the same words for tribes, the only difference is they have another plural suffix og-lar and the more archaic og-uz or og-ur in Lir-Turkic. Therefore "Oglar Huns" means "Nation of the tribes/clans". When the European Huns splittered, there was many 'Og'-ur / Og-lar, too, like On-Ogur, OturOgur. The endonym of the Turkic people before Türk was just "Og" = tribe/relatives and "küŋ" = people/nation. Some personel names of the Hunnic rulers are Turkic, some are not because of the new culture they embraced. Toraman-a = Töremen, like it is said, means "righteous" or "in alignment with the laws" Mihrkul-a = Mihr kulı, "servant of Mihr " Persian Sun God. Like in Şah-kulu "Servant of the Shah" and Tanrı-kulu "Servant of God". Kingil-a = Kıñgıl kıñ-, kıd-, kıy = to strike, to attack + gıl = an archaic suffix for building an inperative in the old turkic language. Therefore the name Kıñgıl meant "go and strike or go attack or even Show no mercy" or something. Today kıy-mak means having no mercy in turkish. The same name giving trend you see in the European Huns. Rugil-a = Urgıl = Go and beat Ru-a = Ur = beat The -a particle suffix at the end of the names is an indo-european thing. Maybe the meaning of Attila is similar. Attil-a = At-gıl = Go and throw, release an arrow, strike. My theory of Atillas name is supported by the germanic sources: Atgıl = Etzel There is absolutely no doubt that the Huns were turkic. Of course there have been other languages, because it was an empire ruling over many different people and learning stuff from them. Maybe they assimilated in the later generations like the Mughals later on. Greetings Deniz

@papazataklaattiranimam

7 ай бұрын

Based

@ZoltanHoppar

7 ай бұрын

I didn't would like to bind khuun-kün like that. Instead the original korean word as hwan, that is pronounced as huun, same way as the chinese hun. The kh is most likely xianbei origin, that maybe ended with the göktürkic version. But more or less yes.

@denizucar3947

7 ай бұрын

@@ZoltanHoppar how do we know that hwan and küŋ are related?

@mmpchinggis

5 ай бұрын

Maybe Kunj from hun why u think everythink from turkish ?Hun means in mongolian human.And Goturks not was muslim and not 100% ancestor of modern turkish people. modern means after bor Jesus. Goturks lived B.C 8th century in central mongolia.

Always brightens my day to see a new vid from Khan's Den 👍

Hey dude,love you content !!!!this channel is massively Underrated tnx for all those beautifu vids ! love form UK

Loved the paintings and the conclusion/intro to the next chapter! Can't wait to watch it!

I love this channel it shows all the history of the great turkic empires What Western history never show in there history book's

great video clip❤

I waited to be mentioned that Bumin and Istemi had a brawl, that brake into two the göktürk empire, and Bumin lost everything. This was the reason Istemi made a deal with the Byzantine rulers to be hired to protect the most western limeses. Maybe in the next part. In many parts, uyghurs, sogdians (mainly ancestors of uzbeks) are the key players as the silk road always been on the table. In our old HU kings list, we were part of the Kushites, then later we become part of "Kadar", or Kidarites, after their fall then with the Heptalites. The heptalites gained huge support from Khorasani Mleccna tribes, who are followed the Vedas, and that gave huge forces both the onogurs, and uyghurs too.

recommend studies of Dr.ARADI ÉVA.lived in India over 20 years she was a professor on New Delhi university, even met Indira Ghandi, she have studies of Huns,Hunza,Kusans,Heftalitais. speaks few Asian laungage,..Dr OBRUSÁNSZKI BORBÁLA,she is at present a general consul of Hungary in Mongolia speaks Chinese,english,mongol ect ,she is a ex member ,and student of Dr,Kiszelyi István and Dr.Bárdi László archeologist in Kina .Mr.Bárdi is a person who discovered a 7 nation in China the UYGURS...

(Khan Den) The historical coverage channel is always sharing remarkable videos such as this one

Excellent as always. TY.

You can make a video about the grand king Árpad and how it became the western Hungarian kingdom. 'Cause I and curious about the Magyar origins of Hungary.

Thank you for this

Just discovered your channel and I think I'll be a casual viewer

Well done indeed! Thanks!

The link established by the original Weishu between the Hephtalites and the Gaoju may mean that the Hephtalites were a Turkish tribe and , more precisely , an Oghuric one , as the Gaoju are regarded as inheritors of the old Tiele confederation supposed to be the origin of the various Oghuric tribes . DE LA VAISSIÈRE, ÉTIENNE. “Is There a ‘Nationality of the Hephtalites’?” Bulletin of the Asia Institute, vol. 17, 2003, pp. 119-32. Rezakhani, Khodadad (2017). ReOrienting the Sasanians: East Iran in Late Antiquity. Edinburgh University Press. p. 135. The suggestion that the Hephthalites were originally of Turkic origin and only later adopted Bactrian as their administrative, and possibly native, language (de la Vaissière 2007: 122) seems to be most prominent at present.

Very nice video again..Gained knowledge of the Hunnic invasions as well as settlement of Hunnic Hepthalite kingdoms in Afghanistan.. I also like the fact the ancestors of the Turks were Asiatic looking 😊

@TugrulG

6 ай бұрын

We might have liked Western women and our look might have changed. But the core is always there… Be an honorable nomad at all cost!

Super wonderful and informative video about roots of Turkik tribe's, kaganat Turkiks, kiradits,kushans established, North Asia minor during Persian and Rome empire's at first 500 years of first 1000 AD years. Thank you, Khan Den channel, for sharing

@user-cg2tw8pw7j

5 ай бұрын

Why do they have Indo-European DNA?

Müthiş bir diksiyon… Ve fakat bu mümkün mü?Ve Olabilirliği ihtimaller dahilinde yüzde kaçtır?

We Appreciate you Khans Den! We will be able to show our children these. According to my DNA studies my Khazar ancestors ancestors seen to have come from mainly the Sakas and and the areas of Bactria

@pascalheimbach861

4 ай бұрын

Here you are. Interesting to learn that your Khazar ancestry do not bear mainly turcic origins, but rather scythian-bactrian (tokharian). Using oghur hunnic tongue as lingua franca during the khazarian kaganate does not prejudge your ethnic background. Don't you think so ?

As a Mughal this is very interesting for me

@iftikharhusain6286

7 ай бұрын

@Qazaq_Qyiat that's interesting

@iftikharhusain6286

7 ай бұрын

@Qazaq_Qyiat where do you live these days

@TugrulG

6 ай бұрын

You both guys are part of Turan. Hajra Turan !

yet again another great video..

Bu bilgilir için teşekkürler

Will we see the Panonian Avars next?

In short, it is hard to think of any other ethnolinguistic entity in history that conquered so vast a territory and founded so many empires and states, also contributing to world civilizations. The history of the Turkic peoples was an important factor in world history for more than a millennium until the emergence of Europe as the world's dominant power. What happened in the Turkic world often affected the history of China, Central Asia, the Middle East, South Asia, and Europe. One may also argue that world history began with the "Turko-Mongol" empire created by Chinggis Khan. In the contemporary world, Turkic-speaking nations form six states (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, and Turkey/Türkiye) and several "autonomous" units in Russia (the republics of Chuvash, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Altai, Khakassia, Tuva, and Sakha) and China (the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region). Turkic peoples also reside as minority groups in several other countries, including Mongolia and Iran, among others. It would therefore be difficult to acquire a comprehensive understanding of world history as well as our present world without studying the history of the Turkic peoples.

@arystanbeck914

7 ай бұрын

There is also a number of Turkic peoples in Russia's North Caucasus: Nogais, Kumyks, Karachais, Balkars, in Ukraine there are Crimean Tartars, in Moldova there are Gagauzs, etc.

@user-cg2tw8pw7j

7 ай бұрын

@@arystanbeck914 Most of them are indigenous peoples, such as the Bulgarians

Incrível a história dos turcos das estepes!

The "Hun" component of the Pannonian Avars aka Varchonites from Var & Chunni(Hun) likely stemmed from the White Huns

good work. for mr algorythm

So well

Extremely wonderful video! I am thankful for your valuable, elite researches and all your priceless efforts. You are the best historian and youtuber ever! You told us hunnic history and central asian diversification in nearly 30 minutes. Wow, great job, you are wonderful! 👏👏👏 Ydna genetic studies also prove the hunnic history that you told us; as part of indians, iranians, east europeans include altaic siberia originated R1a ydna haplogroup. This haplogroup may not have been directly special to huns and dated to first century BC, but altaic nomadic people could migrate for tousands of years to everywhere they could reach (by horse or by walking) and adapted to local cultures, religions and languages wherever they have gone. But, they still carry their altaic genetic roots. Altaic people are actually P1 ydna but their descendants are Q1a yeniseian, slab grave culture, Q1b native americans, R, R1 tagar, malta buret, baikal cultures, uyghurs, R1a hunnic, turkic, ugric, R1b saka, sumer, west euroasian people and these people are first inventers of horse domestication and trading horses. All these people are not classified as altaic specifically but they had spoken similar agglutinative languages like uralic-altaic, dene-yeniseian, tyrrhenian-vasconic etc as relatives. Additionally, I have inspected mtdna haplogroups and I have realized that maternal mtdna human migrations match enough with paternal ydna human migrations as migrated together. Siberian mtdna haplogroups are D, G, C-Z, N, Y, A-X (also relative I-W can be included) and these haplogroups are spread to americas and central asia as also evidences elder hunnic migrations from east to west. So, we can simply say that altaian siberia originated uralic-altaic, dene-yeniseian, tyrrhenian-vasconic people have relative genetic roots maternally, paternally or both. Altaian siberians are a great relative family both genetically and lingusitically, who have mixed with indoeuropean and afroasiatic people in europe, central, south, southwest and west asia, even in americas in history resulted a mysterious diversification of humans. I say this as God's gift to make people meet eachother.

Usta doğu hunlarının şimdiki torunları ( han çinlileri, huyiler, koreliler, goguryalılar) üzerine bir araştırma serisi yapsan iyi olur!

Wreacked havoc 3:04 is pronounced reekt. Reckt seems to have become normal. Loath and Loathe are also conflated: the first is th as in thought, loath to do something. Another normal conflation is tenant and tenet. Just trying to help.

@KhansDen

17 күн бұрын

Thanks for the tips. It's certainly awkward rewatching these older videos with those sub-par AI pronunciation.

@charvaka9526

17 күн бұрын

@@KhansDen My sympathies.

17:07 I doubt it's head-binding that caused that elongated skull. It might be genetic. The people that really did that (head-binding/cranial modification) has a different shape skull than that what's showing in this picture.

" Drums of liberation. " Perhaps you may let us hear that before 29/10 as a gesture. İ would very much appreciate that.

It is not a coincidence that there was a convergence in the chronological stages of the migrations of the Hun tribes in Eurasia, as well as the emergence of the Hun empires in Eurasia during the fourth and fifth centuries AD. The fourth and fifth centuries AD can be considered the “Age of the Huns” by all standards. With regard to the Hun kingdoms in Central Asia, whose expansions reached South Asia and the Iranian plateau. We have a historical source that monitors the conflicts of the Sassanian Empire with the Hun kingdoms, which is the book of Ferdowsi epic Shahnameh. The Shahnameh epic completely linked the Turks and the Hun kingdoms. The Shahnameh mentions that during the era of Shahanshah Bahram Gur, a battle took place with the Kingdom of the Kidarites, where the Kidarites attempted to expand into the lands of eastern Iran (Khorasan). Al-Ferdowsi says in this context: “The news came to Bahram about the Khagan’s entry into the kingdoms of Iran... Bahram fled and then sent Mobads to the Khagan by agreeing to pay the tax to him and hand over the country to him... The Khagan was happy about this and said to the Turkic princes: Who can control the country of Iran without fighting except me...”. Al-Ferdowsi mentions the events of the conflict between the Sassanian Empire and the Hephthalite Empire during the era of Shahanshah Pirouz I: “Peirouz prepared to fight the Turkic king, Khush Nawaz .... The Al-Khaqan said to Pirouz: Your grandfather Bahram was more noble than you in command and greater in status than you, and there was no one like him among the kings of Iran. Where splendor, majesty, chivalry and strictness, and he was satisfied with this fair division between the two kingdoms, and this is his agreement with us ... If you do that, we will be forced to drag soldiers to fight you and prepare to meet you, so return to your country and beware ... The Khaqan sent another messenger to Peroz warning him of the consequences of treachery. He warns him against violating the treaty approved by his grandfather.... The Khagan went with his soldiers to a camp located near Samarkand and ordered the soldiers to dig a deep hole like a trench and cover it with dirt... The two armies met and Peroz fell into the deep hole with his brother Hormuz, his son Qubadh, and a group of his princes and commanders. ...The Khagan took those who had fallen into the pit and captured them... He attacked the Iranians, killed them, captured some of them, and took their weapons and money. The Khagan returned to his country victorious in the battle....” Some historical studies put forward a prevailing historical hypothesis about the secret of the success of the lightning-fast expansion of the Great Khagan İstemi in Transoxiana and the rapid integration of the Sogdians with the Ashina dynasty. It is that these Sogdians are from the Hun tribes that settled in the river country and formed the aristocracy in the cities, and therefore they quickly merged with the Ashina dynasty. Even some intermediate historical sources mention a striking piece of information, which is that some of the Sogdians in Transoxiana could be distinguished from the rest of the Sogdians in terms of their culture, which was similar to the Turkic culture, and most likely these Sogdians preserved an essential part of their original Hunnic culture. There is many historical evidence of this. For example, one of the reasons for the rooted presence of the Ghaznavid Empire in Bactria and its successful expansion in South Asia is the presence of the Turkic Khalaj tribes, whom the Ghaznavid dynasty was able to recruit with ease in its conquests. The scientist and philosopher Al-Biruni mentions interesting information about the presence of people of the Turk Shahi Ashina dynasty in Ghazni. It can also be concluded that the spread of Turkic tribes in Eurasia constituted a major factor in the success of the expansions of the Chinggisid Empire.

@Reader_curiosity

7 ай бұрын

I noticed some comments attacking the clip out of ignorance or prior animosity. Therefore, I will quote quotes from a scientific research in which the researcher reviews Chinese records about the Xiongnu, and after that review the researcher decides the following: “ From the above records, it can be seen that the Xiongnu closely relates to the Türks and the Uighurs in folk customs and successive relationships. In addition, the well preserved Turkic and Uighur inscriptions fully prove that both the Turkic and Uighur languages belong to the ancient Turkic, which is the eastern branch of Turkic linguistic family. It could then be tentatively inferred that the Xiongnu language probably also belongs to, or is a branch of the Turkic linguistic family”. And then that historical researcher gives the prevailing opinion in the scientific community about the Xiongnu: “Most modern scholarships accept the Xiongnu origin of the Türks”.

Really good video! I love it

Nice video i love xiongnu Empire from Azerbaijan 🇦🇿🇹🇷🇺🇿🇰🇿🇰🇬🇹🇲

The emergence of the Huns was the people who fled to the north from within or on the edge of the southern empire. At this time, they were not strong enough. If they were strong, they would not flee. But such a group needs a strong seed catalyst country to ignite and launch. Who is igniting? Their nation-state groups, Aryans, etc. are highly suspect, and opposition within the empire will also fund them

@ggoddkkiller1342

7 ай бұрын

The movements of Nomadic tribes weren't exactly fleeing in same understanding of a settled population, why bother fighting against a stronger enemy while you can move entire nomadic cities and live in a far more hospitable area? Even while Nomadic tribes were conquering they would still constantly move their Oba cities around depending on seasons and land conditions.

When the Mongols retreated from China, they returned to Mongolian Central Asia; when the Manchus retreated, they returned to Tunguska; when the Yuezhi retreated from China, they returned to the vicinity of India; when the Uyghurs retreated from China, they retreated to the Turks and India; Tibet also They would flee to India because a series of wars between Aryan and other countries drove people living in northern India into the mountains. People living in Southeast Asia today are driven into the mountains from near Bangladesh. Eventually they met people who came south from China. The people who escaped combined to form today's Southeast Asia

@fredcheng2736

4 ай бұрын

No, only the Mongols retreated from China, and the rest of the nationalities were assimilated by China people. Today, only 200 Manchus in China know Manchu language. Uighurs only entered China temporarily and did not rule China.

with all due respect, the Germanic tribes (like the Herulii, Ostrogoths, Vandals, and Visigoths) who were kicked out of Central and Eastern Europe due to the Hunnic intrusions and takeover of their territories, never actually established "non-Latin" empires, these Germanic peoples actually assimilated and integrated into Western Roman territories and carved their own Latin kingdoms out of these Western Roman territories, and much of their descendants were Romanized after a hundred years of permanently settling into the Western Roman territories.

What about Bathor? He was more fearsome than Attila.

could u make a detailed video on the scythians,prototurks,sakha?...

Latest DNA sequencing researches established that Yuezhi too were Xiongnu despite it's the Xiongnu which defeated and displaced them, and there is no link between the Yuechi and Tocharians who came and settled within almost the same region with Yuechi centuries after them.

@user-cg2tw8pw7j

7 ай бұрын

No, these were Scythians, according to the Romans and Greeks

@Alprtngakrc

7 ай бұрын

@@user-cg2tw8pw7j Romans and Greeks were using the words "Scythian, Hun and Turk" interchangibly. For example East Roman historians were calling Seljuk Turks "Scythians" too.

@user-cg2tw8pw7j

7 ай бұрын

@@Alprtngakrc No, according to DNA, these people were Aryan peoples when they came to Central Asia and North India. The Persians, Romans, and Armenians said that these people do not resemble the Turks or Mongols, but rather they resemble the Sogdi, Turkharians, and others, and these are Aryan peoples.

@user-cg2tw8pw7j

7 ай бұрын

@@Alprtngakrc My brother, when the Seljuks appeared in the region, the stupid Romans said that the Seljuks were Persians

@Alprtngakrc

7 ай бұрын

@@user-cg2tw8pw7j No on the contrary all the ancient Persian, Roman and Armenian historians were all regarding Scythians as the ancestors of Turks. That is why they were using the words Scythian, Hun and Turk interchangibly. What we witness today is a clear revisionism in history. Besides Yuechi is proven to Xiongnu with DNA sequencing researches made in Tarim Basin. These researches established the fatct tha Tocharians and Yuechi weren't the same people as well.

Алхун=The Red Hun=Қизилжадрақ Туркман=The Red Turkman. Surkhi is Turkman clan which means in the Persian Red=Qizil. Modern Surkhandarya=(ancient Bactria)The River of Surkhi=(Surkh+on in the Persian signifies plurality) -Red (Turkman) region of the Southern Uzbekistan. Mustafa Kamal Ataturk also from the Qizil Turkmans of the Balkan Peninsula. Our tribal-clanal village is still To'ra and Alchon king To'raman(a). Not late Chingizid To'ra ethnonym. Surkhi and Chadrak clans of the Ersary a same Salur=External Salur tribal entity similarly together within Ersary, Taka, Yavmut, Saryk tribes. Incorporation of our people-ancestors by Istami Dizavul's order into the Turkic (con)federation.

Why you take the meaning of one expert who says toramana is turcik and not the 10 who says its iranic?

@KhansDen

7 ай бұрын

Who are these "10" who claimed it would be Iranic? Where? When? Please provide a source.

@ChristopherTanne-se3pz

7 ай бұрын

Sry its an other name in an other video.but i lokked in the ruler list of the ruler of the alchon, kadirates and so on and there no turkish names. Probably one of 10 you can say it can be turkish. Why you make them tuekish?they use bactrian. When turkish tribes haven‘t turkish names you deny an other herrtaige becouse they write turkish so they turkish.

@ChristopherTanne-se3pz

6 ай бұрын

You know?

His mode is not chanyu metehan

Bangladesh is a country founded by the Yuezhi people. They are opposed to the Arabized Pakistan. India is a Persianized Yuezhi country, and they are also opposed to the Arabized Pakistan. They are much kinder to Bangladesh. This contradiction has been going on for a long time. In ancient times, Persia is dissatisfied with the long-term conflicts in Arabia. Even if Iran today calls itself Persia, it only occupies the core territory of Persia. The population structure has long since changed. The Persian and Arab Turks are hostile to each other and allied with each other.

@Nastya_07

7 ай бұрын

"founded by the Yuezhi people" But they don't exist anymore, in fact there is a *huge* gap between the Ancient Yuezhi and the modern countries of India and Bangladesh. Also, the Yuezhi spoke Iranian and possibly Tocharian, not Indic.

other than snits and giggles what is the point of studying any of these groups? did they develop Cold Fusion or discover the cure for cancer? what scientific or technological advances did any of these folks leave as a legacy? what contributions to the Arts did any of them make? great paintings, plays, poetry, symphonies? can someone explain how the study of these people is relevant for those of us living in the present? their history just seems to be a never ending parade of warlords and aggression. no rise of democratic republics or industrial revolutions or Renaissance!

@user-ol2fb9fo7r

2 ай бұрын

War is based, civilization is for losers.

@Kuzguni

8 күн бұрын

Dude, don't be a bigot, please. Especially when we have such a vicious understanding of the world.

@paulroese1376

5 күн бұрын

@@Kuzguni i was just asking a question though one might just as well study alchemy or witchcraft

From thumbnail, Central Asian look like Europeans long ago?

I thought the Huns language was not From the Turkic language group but the Uralic language group.

Kidarite chads defeated Shapur II two times according to Armenian primary sources.

@user-cg2tw8pw7j

7 ай бұрын

How did he defeat him when he joined his army, Shapur II, against the Romans and in the Wars of Shapur?

The words Dominate, Conquer is kinda played out every one uses it, every ones dominate but cant form harmony smh 🤦🏽‍♂️

Göktürk Khaganate best empires of turkic Avar Khaganate 🏹

Jai Hinduja. Real Xiiongnu did not disappear in China. They were Sinicized and had been integrated into Han people. Their descendants have adopted the 5 surnames Zhao, Liu, Kim, Hu Lun and Wang. I saw in a travelog that there is still a surviving Xiongnu village in East China.

Hunnic is Old Turkic Peoples 🈴

Име-Курум=българонугур к'хан Крум🇧🇬❤️💪🐺

Afghan ancestors!

ما ایرانی ها در چهار راه دنیای غرب به شرق قرار گرفته ایم و همیشه و تا به امروز نیز ادامه دارد دنیای غرب از اینجا شروع می شود ممنون

@user-cg2tw8pw7j

6 ай бұрын

Then why did you, Aryan immigrants, kill the indigenous people of Iran, such as the people of Elam?

hmm bulgarians,are from Dulo clan.Dulo and Ashina,as i see hate each other and fought non stop,to Balkan wars,am i wrong?But,why we are so persisted,for this name Bulgaria(Българиа)and bulgarians,we lose 2 other Bulgaria countries,by Ashina,but didnt give up this name?I understandwe are mix, scitho-sarmatian,hunic,slavic and thracian tribes,but why so many died,to keep this name all around Black see alive?Now is forbiden since mongols,to call yourself bulgarian in the east,but we give all-alfabet,clergy,old church slavonic is a pure old bulgarian,to them hahaha

There are no Xiongnu, only Huns. They are some free people who do not want to be restricted by the unreasonable framework of the country. Your pronunciation of Xiongnu is very interesting and quite standard. Except that most people in Chinese cannot pronounce this word well, what is a Huns? In fact, there are still people today, such as The Uyghurs in Xinjiang, China were imprisoned in concentration camps. Many of them fled. Those who did not escape would have to flee sooner or later. The CCP established concentration camps to prevent the Huns from escaping. Countries such as Africa and South America fled north. They are also the concrete embodiment of the concept of Huns. The expression is to escape from the current government society and go to an unknown land with some hope.

How did the Turks turn out to be Muslims whereas the Huns become Christians ？

@Kuzguni

8 күн бұрын

They dominated different geographies. And they switched to the dominant religion of that geography in order to rule comfortably.

Turks are the real creators of empire!

Los hunos eran chinos, no tenían barbas 😊

@TugrulG

6 ай бұрын

Maybe your father is, too ?

@angelmoreno6577

6 ай бұрын

@@TugrulG only speak a yoke, my father RIP. Respect

@TugrulG

6 ай бұрын

@@angelmoreno6577 You called my father Chinese so I thought maybe yours is too and that is why you say so. May he rest in peace.

@TugrulG

6 ай бұрын

@@angelmoreno6577 A gift for you. Mongols also consider Huns as their fathers and we meet in Huns with them. kzread.info/dash/bejne/nIFsxqWAedCcqcY.html

@volkanozturkmen6245

3 ай бұрын

Huns🇹🇷🇦🇿🇰🇿🇰🇬🇹🇲🇺🇿🇭🇺 Not chinese🇨🇳💀 The Huns massacred the Chinese and took their lands, and the Chinese built the Chinese Wall because they were afraid of the Huns. Huns are nomadic warrior races like the Turks.

I wearied of your use of "CE" and "BCE" and the droning AI. sooo bye. there are others covering the same topics.

Compared to India, the Persians are also Huns. The Persians see that the countries north of the Amu Darya River are also Huns. This concept of Huns is not static. The ancient Persians have been mainly integrated into India. Today's Central Asia is a group of fake Persian descendants. Some of them are Part of the Arabs are Turks, and the Yuezhi people are the ancient Persians. They are the Huns to the Indian natives, but the Yuezhi themselves are also threatened by the Huns. The Yuezhi people = Uyghurs = Tajiks = Persians = spit fire Luo people, the same people can just speak different regional languages

Хунны не тюрки, а Кавказцы, восточно Кавказцы.. Масагеты, Саксмасагеты.. Это Дагестанцы жившие по всей Евроазии.. Хун до этого в северной европе Готами называли в Византии Даками называли.. это нынешние Дарганы, даргинцы и другие восточнокавказские народы..

@emmetshtainakov9796

Ай бұрын

Я смотрю,у Дагестанцев появилась потребность в великой истории?)

@user-ne2zr2bo7l

Ай бұрын

@@emmetshtainakov9796 у нас есть история, без приписок.. вы просто не слышали об этом.. нам нет необходимости переписывать чужие истории..

@emmetshtainakov9796

Ай бұрын

@@user-ne2zr2bo7l если нет необходимости,так зачем приписываете?)

@emmetshtainakov9796

Ай бұрын

@@user-ne2zr2bo7l оно и видно, особенно учитывая,что ваши предки,судя по геному,никогда из Кавказа и не выходили :)

Yueban is weak Xiongnu or Xiongnu/Hunnu in Central Asia or weak Hunnu

Its very false

A turkic channel, promoting turkic propaganda about the "turkicity" of the Huns, a multinational confederation of tribes.....

@KhansDen

7 ай бұрын

Why don’t you at least try to disprove actual points made here instead of goalposting? All the scholars quoted here are not Turks themselves. If you have a problem with their work, complain to them (in case they are still alive) and not to us here.

@TugrulG

6 ай бұрын

@@KhansDenyou know these kinds of guys. They are everywhere like flies and they exactly know one fact. It is hard to be a Turk, because you fight with the whole world. But it is harder to be non-Turk because you fight with the Turk. Hajra Turan ! P.S. You are doing such a great work for our children. My 12 years old daughter loves your videos! Other 8 year old boy, METE, is on the way to learning English. Don’t feel alone. Future Asenas and Bortecines are endless and 2 out of this house will honor the ancestors like you do, like I do.

@odilbekb-sarkaev1052

3 ай бұрын

@Tasosk790 we have genetic and tribal written facts matched calm down 😂

@tedchandran

3 ай бұрын

Jai Hinduja. Most of the Turks today are turkified with slight hybridized North East Asian genes.

@tasosk790

3 ай бұрын

@@odilbekb-sarkaev1052 genetic and tribal.... 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 From a confederation of tribes that spoke a hundred languages and had a hundred customs... 😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽

TURKS ARE THE KING OF THİS WORLD!🤘🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇲🇺🇿🇰🇿🇰🇬🇭🇺🇧🇬🇲🇳

@user-cy3wk2lo6o

Ай бұрын

LOL turks are the history wet dreamer of the world🥹

I am Hazara türkic 💛🤍💙 I love this storyAnd they make really interesting videos

@TikTokahmad_beg

3 күн бұрын

یفتلیان (هون های سفید) اجدادی هزاره ها بودن