"My Fez got attached to my Sallet there..." Now that's a phrase that has likely never been uttered before in all human history.

@edi9892

5 жыл бұрын

Armour is often of the yandere kind and is per definition overly attached, especially mail... Ask any girl or dude with long hair, who tried mail...

@danielelseth4106

5 жыл бұрын

edi they call their long hair their fez?

@edi9892

5 жыл бұрын

@@danielelseth4106 no, but their hair gets even more entangled...

@danielelseth4106

5 жыл бұрын

edi I totally get it. I have shortish hair and it gets caught all the time. I’m just being a pedantic dick because the original comment was about a fez being caught in a sallet, not hair.

@jon-paulfilkins7820

5 жыл бұрын

Depends on the company you keep ;)

"What do soldiers spend most of their time doing?" Bitching.

@GrimToothman

5 жыл бұрын

If the soldiers are not bitching, there is a real problem.

@saltypork101

4 жыл бұрын

Need an open faced helmet for that too.

@DirgeMerec

4 жыл бұрын

you read my mind

@Jazzman-bj9fq

4 жыл бұрын

Haha, yeah bitching and smoking.

@bokvarv1926

4 жыл бұрын

What do soldiers do most of the time...................WAITING! In fact War is 99.9% WAITING. The best WAITER wins the WAITING......................

Talking about how easy it is for soldiers to bump their heads, I am reminded of that moment in the first Starwars where the stormtrooper bashes his head on the doorway while boarding the rebel ship.

@scholagladiatoria

5 жыл бұрын

Great example!

@MaMastoast

5 жыл бұрын

To be fair, he probably bumped his head because he WAS wearing that particular kind of helmet :P

@blairbuskirk5460

5 жыл бұрын

That was a hallway in the Death Star that the guy hit his head on but yes a classic example of the limited visibility of closed helms

@xToddmcx

5 жыл бұрын

I do find myself hitting my head on the ski lift bars alot more since I started wearing a helmet. You're used to your head being a certain size, and then it's not.

@mr.spider6859

5 жыл бұрын

@@MrMetonicus Quiet, Luke.

In WW1, a lot of head injuries came from falling gravel, small rocks and the like comming from artillery explosions. Against that, the helmets was brilliant.

@SonsOfLorgar

5 жыл бұрын

And also vicious support beams of underground bomb shelters.

@danielelseth4106

5 жыл бұрын

If I remember my history right, the number of head wounds went up after protective headgear was reintroduced in World War One. Not because of ineffective helmets, but because fewer men were dying. Random history fact for you.

@animalxINSTINCT89

5 жыл бұрын

Falling rocks, the mortal enemy of humans since the dawn of time, second only to the pointy stick

@Nerobyrne

5 жыл бұрын

makes sense if you're in a trench. Not many people trying to stab you in the neck there!

@DistantOnion

5 жыл бұрын

Well, it was the British *registered* head injuries that went up. If the soldier died from a head injury it wasn't registered as a head injury.

I want my helmet to protect me from successive tactical nukes, but also give me 360 degrees 20/20 thermal vision. What are my options?

@ksubota

5 жыл бұрын

sallet

@SonsOfLorgar

5 жыл бұрын

That would be tactical dreadnaught armour, Justaerin pattern ;)

@lcmiracle

5 жыл бұрын

Your best protection is your everlasting faith in the undying God Emperor of Mankind.

@edi9892

5 жыл бұрын

You can go with any headgear that grants you the vision. The only caveat is that it must withstand 10th tier magic enchantments in order to give you protection against nukes... If you ask me, where to find 10th tier enchantments, now that's a good question! Most magically inclined persons, won't stop at the *first tier* and learn the *second tier* too and if they devout their life to magic, they manage to master the *third tier* as well. Those that manage to master the *fourth tier* are well renowned and sought after mages and once in a lifetime someone manages to scratch at the *fifth tier.* Such legendary mages are able to turn the tide of battles... The *6th tier* is reserved for supreme beings as no mortal ever managed to get even close unless the few that kept extending his life with human sacrifices. The *7th tier* is likely reserved for arch angels and demons. I once met the prince of darkness himself and he showed me magic of the *8th tier.* I have never come across any information on artifacts or events caused by *9th tier* magic at all. The *10th tier* is god level and I'm not talking about run-of-the-mill Kami, but the one and only, all mighty creator of the universe. For all the time I've been around in this world, I have never found any dependable evidence of said god to ever respond to prayers (against common believe) be it from mere mortals or any supreme beings. As an old acquaintance of mine put it that eloquently: you can take your dream and stuff it up your ar$e.

@szarekhthesilent2047

5 жыл бұрын

Opt1: Melt a catana and shape/reforge it into a samurai helmet. Caution - Not pommel-proof! Opt.2: Become a space marine, die, and get a techpriest of your choice to turn you into a dreadnought/dreadnuts. Your new body will engulf (among other things) your head. Opt.3: Plotarmor type helmet. Light, indestructable, looks probably really cool. Will protect the wearer regardless of logic. Nothing else to say. 15% Chance to deflect Pommelprojectiles.

I used a foreign service helmet soaked in water for 1 week in the burning sun for archaeological fieldwork, (basically digging treches), it really made me appreciate the pith helmet and its design. Can recommend it to anyone!

@tiggytheimpaler5483

5 жыл бұрын

Cheapknight didn't help with the rocks from the ass in the pit next to you that wasn't paying attention? that's what I've needed a few times lok

@cheapknight1293

5 жыл бұрын

@@tiggytheimpaler5483 I didn't get rocks thrown to my head by incompotent diggers, but I am sure it would help. :p

@timtheskeptic1147

4 жыл бұрын

Totally agree. I wear one when camping in the desert. On long hikes it's just as valuable as water. I'll never go out again without it.

This is something artists tend to forget. Very often you see character designs that are only geared toward being badass and fighting, but fall appart as soon as you imagine the characters doing anything else. Even things as simple as walking around, sitting in room or taking a shit can be rendered impossible by excessive amounts of badas looking gear :)

@carbon1255

5 жыл бұрын

Were you thinking of something in particular? I don't really see that in the stuff I come into contact with. I have always associated bad-ass with utilitarian outfits.

@Wetcorps

5 жыл бұрын

Deviantart is full of good examples. Warriors with spikes-covered armors, steampunk characters with gears everywhere, cyborgs with cables poking out of everywhere... Warhammer (both 40k and battle) often does this too, as the miniatures don't need to move :)

@maximsavage

5 жыл бұрын

When you know why medieval armor was designed the way it was, you find out that, even in battle, a lot of fantasy or sci-fi armor simply doesn't work because a person would be completely unable to move while wearing that stuff. Medieval full-plate armor was very easy to move in historically, it's the jousting armor that was excessively heavy, and a knight wouldn't wear that in battle.

@David-ni5hj

5 жыл бұрын

Yes, because it’s made for fighting. You just stop using that shit when you are not in a battle.

@louisvictor3473

5 жыл бұрын

Warhammer does have fluff for that, I believe. It is because the people wearing them are literally superhuman or literally non human with different physiology. Space Marines, long story short, have pooping either engineered out of them or as merely as an alternative to absorbing less useful matter to their bodies. So, they can afford to ignore those concerns because to them that is not a concern.

Kingdom Come Deliverance made me appreciate helmets that don't cover the face. I like to use equipment that provides the best protection, but I cannot stand the restricted vision that you have with the top-notch helmets in that game. So I settle for less protective ones, so I can see while I fight. :)

@JustGrowingUp84

5 жыл бұрын

That's exactly what I thought about! The bascinet has great protection, but it gets annoying really fast, especially for someone like me who likes to fight in melee a lot. So I settled for an iron hat instead.

@corazzinatanner498

5 жыл бұрын

I fought a well armored, well armed bandit who had a good deal of skill. I had on the common bascinet, I parried his hammer and then he deftly redirected and hit my square in the face with it. I had full health, but was killed outright, because he hit me dead in the face with 3-4lbs hammer. Face protection, slightly annoying, but very very important.

@JustGrowingUp84

5 жыл бұрын

+Corazzina Tanner You were affected by the Headcraker perk - which gives a small chance of KO for head hits - in which case it doesn't matter what head armour (if any) you wear.

@00Trademark00

5 жыл бұрын

Exactly what I wanted to write :) I actually found it much harder to defeat my opponents in the helmets which restrict vision, especially when facing two opponents (more is usually suicidal in K:CD unless you have full plate armour and they are some lowly bandits, especially since I played with a mod which made the enemies in groups attack simultaneously and press their advantage more). I could sort of keep track of one opponent but I had no idea where the other guy was until he bashed me over the head with a mace or a halberd and I was half dead. The kettle hat provides very good protection, looks good and offers perfect visibility.

@tyynymyy7770

5 жыл бұрын

In real life you can lift the visor up though. In medieval art you see that quite often.

Incidentally British tankers in ww2 suffered more injuries due to not wearing helmets in their tanks.

@insertnamehere001

5 жыл бұрын

WWII tanks were hot as hell inside, totally understandable to remove a metal bowl from your head before entering one. Probably why we see the Soviets make those leather helmets.

@John-dp1he

3 жыл бұрын

@@insertnamehere001 British tanker helmets were not the steel ones of the ordinary squaddie but more akin to the Motorcycle despatch rider helmet. They weren't worn not because of the heat, but more out of pride in the black beret worn by armoured corps personnel

The secondary effects of high explosive shells is rather interesting when you look at them. A shell on its own can only carry so much fragmentation or shrapnel, which starts to greatly reduce the odds of doing anyone any harm the further you get from the detonation point. Your odds of not being in the way of a flying bit that is still moving fast enough to do you harm drops off more and more. And there is only so much energy in a shockwave to go around before it drops off enough to not harm you. If however that same shell just happens to toss a load of earth and rocks up in the air to rain down on everyone, in addition to the shockwave and frag/shrapnel, then it can become that much more lethal. Back in comes the helmet, not to protect from shrapnel/fragmentation/shockwave, but rather to reduce the impact that clods of earth and stone can have, turning deadly blows into stunning hits, and stunning hits into minor annoyances that were quickly overcome. Down goes death rates, up goes numbers of people hospitalised with head wounds.

@Riceball01

5 жыл бұрын

RealLuckless The opposite was really the case during WW I. Prior to steel helmets becoming standard issue both sides were seeing a large number of head injuries and once steel helmets became the norm they saw the number of head injuries go way down.

@RealLuckless

5 жыл бұрын

Initially there were high numbers of fatalities vs wounded, and the introduction of helmets saw a decrease in fatalities and increase in overall head wounds thanks to the number of men now surviving to make it back to hospitals.

@corazzinatanner498

5 жыл бұрын

I'm in the US military. That's exactly why our helmets are getting lighter and the padding is getting better. However, there has to be a trade off. My ACH weighs about 3lbs, my SCA helmet weighs about 10lbs. I'll gladly get struck hard with rattan in my 12gauge mild carbon steel SCA heavy combat sallet, but the light weight kevlar helmet, no, no thanks. I have both helmets lined with the same padding, but the 10lbs helmet can absorb a crap ton more kinetic force, because of its weight.

@Xandros999

5 жыл бұрын

WW2 saw a lot of shrapnel canisters used, ie. flying shotgun shells. Helmets of the day were very much concerned with protecting against projectiles from above.

@carbon1255

5 жыл бұрын

in terms of shock absorption, yeah, it is the same as recoil with a very light gun, it is overpowering. total velocity it reaches when pushed towards your padding is much lower with a heavy helmet, as the same force accelerates a light thing much faster. And impact force is much more damaging than pressure.

Kettle hats are probably the most comfortable helmets around: optimal hearing, breathing and sight; their large brim protects from downcuts, and allows to block the sunlight and keep the water off. I have it on quite often when I'm outside and is GREAT.

@Divert486

5 жыл бұрын

Theyre a little on the large side, stahlhelms nailed it a bit better methinks.

@MaMastoast

5 жыл бұрын

Makes sense I guess. It's basically just a normal hat made out of metal isn't it :P

@LordVltor

5 жыл бұрын

Basically, yep. Though hard hats, even if lighter, tend to be worn "higher" and thus make me feel more exposed.

@jon-paulfilkins7820

5 жыл бұрын

I do larp battles, Stahlhelms can interfear with the hearing, so kettle is for me.

@blairbuskirk5460

5 жыл бұрын

I agree Kettle helms are great. Even the Logging industry standard hard hats and forest firefighter hard hats are patterned after kettle helms as well. They're super practical even world war one era helmets are reminiscent of kettle helms.

Every martial culture has understood the importance of keeping the brainium safe.

@kombatace7971

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, because without it, your jist a piece of flesh with some bones and pee attached

Well given the fact that the head is perhaps the most vulnerable part of your body, and not only during combat, a helmet, even a cloth and cork one, is much better than no protection at all.

Back in the dark ages, when I went through basic training, we were issued pith helmets during the summer months, just because the San Antonio sun was so fierce. Drilling on an asphalt pad for several hours a day, in 100+ degree heat and 90% humidity, meant that passing out through heat exhaustion was not uncommon. Ah, good times!

@Riceball01

5 жыл бұрын

In the Marine Corps all Primary Marksmanship Instructors on both MCRDs are issued pith helmets and wear them whenever they're on the range with recruits.

@cdgonepotatoes4219

5 жыл бұрын

You got me thinking for a moment you're a time traveller from the medieval dark age

@demonprinces17

4 жыл бұрын

That's airforce, army had a steel pot

im surprised that people still get caught up with "that part of your body is exposed, therefor the armor is ineffective" is a modern soldiers ineffective just because his plate carrier only covers his torso? you don't need to wrap your entire body in metal in order to be protected. in medieval fighting, the best protection is defending yourself with a shield or a weapon. in modern times, the best protection is hiding behind some large object that stops bullets. the things that we wear for protection are meant as *extra* protection in case those initial forms of protection fail. in neither period do people completely cover their entire body in protective material and become invincible.

@Spetulhu

5 жыл бұрын

Well, a knight in full plate is pretty much invincible vs anyone not equipped specifically to deal with him - but that's expensive stuff for really elite guys who aren't going to stand guard duty. A modern version of that would be something like riot cops with full ballistic plates, or bomb disposal guys - those too are only brought out for special occasions. Anyone else will have to compromise because he's not one of those special guys and his employer needs him to be able to do other stuff. A modern soldier who was allowed to buy his own armor would probably quickly start thinking like medieval mercenaries, picking upgrades that are lighter if at all possible. After all, if I'm only going to get use out of something extra I have to carry every day 0.1% of the time do I actually want to drag it along if not required to? Some guys bring their own handguns (if the unit allows it), those with any sense leave it at home or use the weight for a few spare rifle mags instead.

@Bearded_Tattooed_Guy

5 жыл бұрын

A modern soldier carries armour only where his life depends upon it, where he really needs it, and nowhere else. Keeps cost, and more important, the weight down.

Years back when I was in the US Army we kept our chin straps fastened unless were taking them off. Steel pots were heavier than kevlars, but they were more comfortable. Also you could not warm up water to shave in a kevlar. At Infantry AIT in Ft Benning the drill sergeants would go around when we were eating outside and demand we uncover (take our helmets off} when dining in "their dining room". In a combat environment we took them off, or kept them generally as we willed although there at times directions on this. You forget about the "brain bucket" while wearing it all day, though when sitting to rest it most probably would come off directly. I have "been out" for about 23 years but I would imagine it to be pretty much the same.

I used to play with one of these helmets in my Grandparents house. My grandmother was born and lived on french Algeria, and french people there used to wear things like this on a daily basis ( though is was less and less common among gentry) just because of what you said. Very effective against the sun, and when you are running a farm, you have a lot of things to bump your head on. Plus it was kind of a recognition feature of the colonials. Very cool stuff to see it on your channel!

I wear a pith helmet when taking a bath, occasionally when riding my bicycle and always when mowing the lawn.

Where's the rolling pin?

@VideoMask93

5 жыл бұрын

John underrated reference.

@stevengood1812

5 жыл бұрын

Need

@winstonsallet9541

5 жыл бұрын

Have a like for your obscure comment

@cdgonepotatoes4219

5 жыл бұрын

Come on, it's not obscure, I bet everyone here knows about the Matt Down Under clip

@Bearded_Tattooed_Guy

5 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/eGxrzMqHhrO-Y7A.html

To add to the points made, some of my thoughts: -Non-ballistic helmets are very often still in use with various paramilitary and military units today. If any of you have seen the film Black Hawk Down, you may have noticed that the Delta Force operators are wearing hockey helmets instead of a ballistic helmet like the Rangers. That's because their mission for that operation was an HVT capture, and they were expecting to rappel from helicopters, get their man, and get out. In that context, a lighter helmet, used by an elite soldier, would be preferable. These days they're often referred to as 'bump helmets', and several companies produce them specifically for military and police application. - Even for the more complete head protection worn in the Late Middle Ages by men at arms and knights, heavy helmets like hounskull bascinets and great helms and armets and great bascinets were probably held by a page or squire-- along with the gauntlets-- until the very moment when the fighter expected to either make or receive an attack. Under a summer sun, I don't think it is plausible for a man to exert himself and sweat under a full enclosed helmet for the often hours-long kabuki theater of maneuvering and forming battles that acted as the prelude to actual pitched combat.

@boriskapchits7727

5 жыл бұрын

the very essence of modern non ballistic helmet is the Soviet-Russian tanker helmet it is made soft and padded to absorb bumps has no other functionality.

@yahya_elistinsary

5 жыл бұрын

Boris Kapchits that helmet has been in use since before WW2

@carbon1255

5 жыл бұрын

Lots of knights died in great helms in the middle east on crusade from heat exhaustion :P

@patliao556

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah man. I totally wouldn't put that bitch on until I absolutely needed it.

The "perfect" helmet will never exist. Essentially, helmets have always, and will always be about compromise. We can further increase the level of protection provided, such as when the US military switched from the WW1/Korea/Vietnam-era steel helmet to the more modernized PASGT helmet, but such protection always comes at a cost. The sides came down lower over the ears, the front had a brim for sun, rain, and broader incidental protection, and the walls were thicker. Unfortunately, the PASGT was also heavier and more cumbersome. This led to the development of lighter, thinner helmets, such as with the US Army's ACH. Compromising some of their integrity and protection against projectiles and shrapnel, the newest generation of helmet allows for much greater hearing & visual range. It also switched from leather & webbing suspension, to a foam padding system anchored with Velcro, allowing far more comfort and adaptability for different head shapes & sizes.

As in most things it's not how well you fight, it's how good you look...

Being modern military I'll totally agree, you see heaps of environmental and accidental injuries, my old helmet has taken a few knocks I'd really really not like to take against my bare head, although I am top to toe in scars from being a bit of a wally/social hand grenade so, for my clumsy self my helmet has saved me a few concussions

Growing up playing games and such. Never thought about helmets. Joined the SCA, started fighting heavy. Was given a flat top great helm as a loaner. Every shot jaringly stuck to it and the liner smelt as if it had been around since the founding 50 years ago. Nowadays, my helmet costs more then the rest of all my armor combined and has better aerodynamics than an F-22 Raptor. The only thing that can stick on it, is a magnet.

Funny how you always end up with the same situation. Some of the most successful guns in history were the most reliable ones, because it meant everyone's always armed. Some of the most successful tanks were the ones designed to be reliable and/or easy to fix, so you don't end up losing half of them before you get into position. And some of the most popular helmets in history were the most comfortable ones that allowed the user to actually breathe and not pass out from the heat, so the men don't feel like deserting after a day or two of marching. Seems whoever manages to get the most fresh and equipped men to the battlefield tends to win.

People always forget about cartridge cases falling from aircraft.

@texasbeast239

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, it's all fun and games when air cover comes into view... ...until the brass starts falling out of the sky all around you!

1:30 Why is that guy holding that cows tail?

@IceniBrave

5 жыл бұрын

That guy isn't judging how you like to get off, so how about you just give him a break

@fenwah1

5 жыл бұрын

I wanna know why he's wearing mail underpants while doing it

@myowndata

5 жыл бұрын

I asked me that too. Maybe is showen herding catle? Or maybe he is somehow strangely oriented (as its showen by his mail panthys) and is planning something very wired ;)

@martinbeagle6448

5 жыл бұрын

The old Reading reach around.

@cdgncgn

5 жыл бұрын

if you do that IRL, its is pretty much the only way to move them in the way you want. Unless you get kicked, but you should keep distance from their legs, if you want them whole. Squeeze their tail to the side and the pain will get them moving. It isnt quite holding, more like 'breaking' what one has to do. Some cows simply refuse to move- And them having a lot more weight than you means you either move them by force or by making them move through causing them some pain. Because some animals, just like people are stubborn. We had those things for some 15 years and parents before had some before, and I saw them do this. It works and you dont need to beat the animal. For example, youre outside, and its late and need to get them back in to the building but for some reason they refuse to move. Either you use force and make them follow or they stand there like dummies. But if you dont want them stolen you need to get them. They dont understand you so thats when you gotta use some pain where it counts.

I believe the British flat helmet was there to protect from shrapnel coming from above as one stands IN a trench and NOT from bullets. The German Stahlhelm was designed to protect from both although for heavy protection for example machine gunners who needed to stay above the lip of the trench had extra plates for real bullet protection. Great stuff as usual Matt!

@PseudoThief

4 жыл бұрын

Exactly what I was going to say. The British design has a wide rim to protect the head AND shoulders (and by association the torso) from air burst fragmentation shrapnel. Given the amount of time spent IN the trenches and exposed to artillery fire vs the amount of time out of trenches and exposed directly to gunfire, it was a pretty good design decision.

My experience is that soldiers spend most of their time standing around, usually in lines, waiting for something. Transport, training, gear handed out, food, etc.

@texasbeast239

2 жыл бұрын

...Ass chewing.

This guy is really nice to listen to. He's not too loud and speaks clearly. I appreciate his sense of humor and the topics he talks about.

9:12 The "like that!" sounded exactly like Lindybeige.

Back in my time, we already had kelvar helmets. During training we weren't allowed to take them off without explicit permission from instructors/trainers. At that stage of technology, they were pretty comfy and I rarely felt any urgent need to remove it (like you said, _where_ are we supposed to hold it if not on the head? It's quite bulky and cumbersome to sling it around backpack or webbing). I can however imagine the different types of discomfort combatants throughout the eras had to endure when the designs were more about protection and not ergonomics and comfort.

Armour is meant for protection? I thought it was to make you look really f*ckin’ cool.

@vedymin1

5 жыл бұрын

No, its to make you dead after one hit.

@jacklonghearse9821

5 жыл бұрын

@@vedymin1 That's what Skyrim taught me.

@lcmiracle

5 жыл бұрын

Fashion soul/hunter ftw

@aysseralwan

5 жыл бұрын

Armour for woman is also to make you look sexy. Don't think 1-dimensional

@szarekhthesilent2047

5 жыл бұрын

You guys have obviously no idea. Armor increases dexterity, strength, intelligence, charisma, Initiative, hp, evade (...) the damage done by your weapon and speed. Also, you can equip it with gems or random wings in order to increase those stats even further. In order to protect all of your body (like, the head f.i.) things like boots, gauntlets are more than enough. Or just keep killing random stuff (ants, mice (...) tons of them) in order to gain combat experience and increase your strength/dexterity which in turn will increase your passive defense. . If you don',t it's not a problem. just carry around a couple of tons of things like apples, berries hot chicken soup (...) to heal you from severe combat wounds on short notice/while within combat.

I don't understand this logic either, almost all combat protective gear has some kind of weakness, either it's for the sake of combat effectiveness or just designed to be wore by grunt who spent 90% of their time not being in combat. Modern body armor/load bearing equipment, aka plate carrier often covers most of the chest area, and sometimes people only put plate in the front. It's for weight reduction, less heat exhaustion, and better mobility in general. People need to wear those and move about in the real world before commenting.

@SonsOfLorgar

5 жыл бұрын

And the best feature of a military kevlar flak jacket is that it doubles as a wearable bedroll :P

@TheCraziestFox

5 жыл бұрын

So does a gambeson. Very comfy.

@WordBearer86

5 жыл бұрын

My IBAS (plate carrier is a more specific type, the body armor the US Army uses is called an IBAS, a grunt term is 'full battle rattle') was almost the exact same weight as a medieval breastplate. Had a 'gorget' (we just called it the throat protector, same function), side plates ('sappy' plates), front and back plates, groin protector (the cock flap for shits and giggles), and shoulder guards were also worn if we had to crew the gun on something like a humvee. While the 'plate' section did cover a fair amount of my abdomen and chest, it did not cover all of it, like with the back plate. A thing to consider about the weight and it being about the same as a medieval breast plate - this is not including the 'molly vest' (the thing worn that has all your magazine pouches and such attached to it) when fully loaded up. Honestly I think modern body armor designers need to go learn up on some of the armor from the later medieval period when they come up with the design for the next model of IBAS. Oh, I also had another type of body armor called a 'chicken vest' which was basically something like a stab vest, but it was my body armor when I was in my tank. Weight was about the same as a gambeson. Odd huh? Also not wearing the back plates is fucking stupid. Yes tankers get issued two sets of body armor, and sadly you wear the heavier of the two more often than the lighter of the two.

@SonofSethoitae

5 жыл бұрын

I don't think I understand your comment; are you implying that grunt armour had deliberately designed weaknesses?

@b19931228

5 жыл бұрын

I'm saying that combat gear designed for most soldiers have the tendency to compromise more protective quality for other things.

"I'm fast and agile, don't need armour to slow me down !" "Here's a book on medieval head wounds." "I'll wear a helmet !"

That "Ciao ragazzi" scared me, and I'm italian

this argument kind of reminds me of a post I saw discussing how proud architects will design all these elaborate and beautiful homes, but won't ever think of it as a space that someone needs to live in, they'll put windows really high up that are impossible to clean, they'll make things hard to access purely for the aesthetic. A design is beautiful not only in its aesthetic, there is beauty also in its practicality, its ease of use, its function. A helmet doesn't just have to look good and protect you, it also has to be worn through long campaigns and grueling marches and if we forget that we forget a core aspect of a soldier's experience of war

Regarding the Corinthian helmet being worn on the back of the head, it was commonly done enough that a variant developed called the Italo-Corinthian or Pseudo Corinthian helmet was made and popular in Italy.

I work in the process industry / plants / factory business and the thing about bumping your head still stands to this day and why we wear helmets in the modern era. Kinda interesting point.

You have repeated the word "breathing" so much as if it is something important...

@jacklonghearse9821

5 жыл бұрын

I never breathe, but I live in an outhouse with Wi-Fi.

@cdgonepotatoes4219

5 жыл бұрын

ikr? Weird guy

Mock me if you will, but I've often wondered if the narrow slit of the "face guard" was used more as we use sunglasses. It greatly reduces glare on bright days, similar to narrow-slit snow glasses. When not needed for that function, the visor could be lifted out of the way or the helmet tilted back.

one of my fav. feats in 3.5 D&D was a armor feat that made it so if you have medium or light armor you can sleep in it, travel farther, run faster, do acrobatics easier, stuff like that.

The “Conquistador” helmet (I forget its real name) was apparently relatively popular with town guards around the 1600s. I have a friend who owns a helmet collection, and he has a beautiful example from the Munich town guard, if I remember correctly. I can’t say how popular it was or where, but that is one non-Spanish example I know of.

For a short period after suffering a face injury in a fall, I wore a full face helmet when off road cycling. One of the most off-putting things was the way it magnified the sound of my own breathing. All the other stuff applied too: additional weight, limited field of view, temperature regulation, condensation, difficult to hear external sounds, difficult to speak to other people clearly, but the sound of my own breathing is what I remember most about it. I now wear a normal helmet and take the risk.

A lot of soldiers equipment came down to practicality. There are numerous cool and usefull things, and nice-to-have bits you could carry about, say, as a redcoat, 1770s. But if you have to bloody march everywhere you go, and have 1, repeat: ONE, knapsack of limited space and convenience, you reall, REALLY apreciate going with less. One of the great things about reenacting not only the popular battles and stuf, but also doing marches in period gear. You learn, rather quickly, to value a reduction in weight to chug around.

@LutzDerLurch

5 жыл бұрын

another bit from that timeframe: the bayonet. It would be much more stable if solidly attached to the musket, but it being removable makes it soooo much more convenient.

Silk is amazing. Thanks for reminding us again of its importance on the battlefield.

Another thing to mention: Once you get used to wearing a helmet, you quickly lose some of your instinct to flinch and duck under things. The helmet makes you a little bit more fearless and conserves willpower that way.

Excellent video, matt! This kind of video about the realities of the actual use of the various historical items is my favourite kind of video. Also: None better than captain context to make this kind of video.

Thank you, Matt, for the image I will never be able to unsee. Now I'll always see Robocop in every sallet I look at.

I had to ware a helmet for football (the American variety) in the 7th grade. I can say with complete confidence that after an hour of wearing it for the very first time, I immediately wanted to take it off. At worst I was expected to wear it for 2 hours, so I cant imagine wearing something like that for a full day or more. I'm not surprised that so many soldiers in the ancient and medieval world preferred comfortable helmets to more protective ones, because just my short experience with the modern football helmet made me envious of the medieval sallet.

2:53 "The purpose of this helmet, primarily, is to stop you from bumping your head on things." Now I'm just picturing a group of soldiers fumbling around, walking into trees or walls, and hitting their heads on every tree branch, door frame, and shelf they possibly can.

This is why I like the kettle helmet shape. It looks like it would keep the rain off durring long guard shifts, which soldiers do a lot more of than actual battles.

TY Matt, it is always nice to learn something from your videos. This one made me consider factors i had never really thought of before. So cleverly efficient to design helmets that can be worn both pushed back or pulled down, without even the need for moving parts! Darn those old craftsmen knew what they were doing! ;)

You just gave me (indirectly) an aswer to a doubt I've had for about a year now concerning the conquistador helmet. Thanks Matt!

Wore a pith helmet as full dress headgear in the Canadian Forces years ago. Thanks for the history on it sir

A tour of the shed would make a pretty good video

What a nuanced presentation. How nice! No hyperbole or sweeping generalizing statements. Genuinely pleased to have stumbled across this.

I love that dented Morion. Even better than the bright shiny engraved ones you see pictures of. That one has been used. That one has been loved. (It happens to be my favorite helmet for fencing in.)

@Psiberzerker

3 жыл бұрын

"How can I..." Put them down on the ground. Unless you're your D&D character, all of these exploitable gaps are much more exploitable if they're not on their feet, with weapons at the ready. Do they have a shield? Then can cover their face a lot better than they can on the ground, trying to roll over, and get back up, with a shield. As long as you're thinking about this, "How can I defeat that?" A good first step has always been getting them on the ground. It's a lot harder to defend yourself from there, and the treatises back this up.

Honestly love these videos. Currently working on a fantasy video game and love common sensing my world building with the martial knowledge provided here.

I'm a fantasy writer, and I always try to take these factors into account when deciding what kind of gear would be favored by different groups of people. For instance, if one of the biggest advantages your elves have over humans is superior vision and hearing, they would probably be more hesitant to use helmets that severely limit those abilities than a human would be.

Awesome video Matt very insightful as always. It’s amazing how people overvalue having EVERY single part of your body covered and are quick to point out openings in armour, when history tells us otherwise. Between protection and mobility, most soldiers/warriors will go with mobility.

One thing that I thought of when you were talking about why not to have a faceguard; In fantasy movies it is a regular thing that IF the hero is wearing a visored helmet there will invariably be a dramatic closing of the visor, is actually something that makes sense. I am genuinely surprised to find something that fantasy consistently gets right (If helmets are even a thing)

Good video and nice headgear. Thank you.

Knyght Errant did a good video on a quite similar topic as well. His main point though is, that a weakness in armour doesn't render the rest of it useless. That's pretty obvious, but you see so many people saying "this armour ist rubbish, it leaves your *insert bodypart* exposed!!" Well yeah, it does have these weakspots, but it's certainly better then wearing no armour and as you pointed out it maybe way more convenient then other more protective options. Good video!:-)

The logistical and quality-of-life issues you bring up are REALLY important (as you well know). I can't tell you how many times in RPGs, I've had players balk at being restricted when wearing full armor and helm. They think they can walk, run, sleep, etc. in full kit and have no negative effects.

A small touch but I love the recent thumbnails. Simple and informative!

When I saw the title I had hoped that this would be a fashion video of Matt putting on different hats and showing off, first minute in its entirety. Good work, Mr Easton.

AFAIK the introduction of the Stahlhelm into the German military was mainly instigated as a solution against shrapnel. It may not have been brilliant at its job, but it was pretty much the best design of the war protection-wise, and it did do its job better than most helmets did. So even if it didn’t protect you from bigger shrapnels, it did so very well against smaller ones. And the massive amount of earth and rocks dropped on you, if you didn’t die of the shockwave first,

One thing to note when using art as an indicator of how the helmet was used is that the artist would usually need to show the face so the subject could be identified. That being said, the design does seem to support that style of wear

Finally a well educated and smart youtuber. Great video!👍👍👍

I prefer my soldiers continue to breathe.

@CelticGod220

5 жыл бұрын

As said by commanders everywhere and everywhen

I noticed this a lot when I hosted an "armor as worn" event where we did team battles over lots of wooded ground. I had a sallet with a visor that could be raised. During the times we weren't fighting (maneuvering around the forest, planning things, etc.) I had the visor raised all the time, which was a very nice advantage I had over everyone else who had more encompassing helmets since I could just do things like talking to my teammates and surveying the battlegrounds easier. Even when approaching the enemy team my visor was raised. Sallets forever!

another major importance of helmets especially in ww1 and ww2 is it protects your head from all the heavy rocks and clumps of dirt flying in the air when an artillery shell detonates. people tend to think of dirt as being soft and cushioning but when a 10 pound clump of it lands on your head after falling 20 feet it's not going to feel that way. In many cases they can result in concussions, unconsciousness and even death.

This "a matter of a possible unexpected hit" reminds me of a motorcycle crash statistics. Integral helmets are the best one because they protect you from 20% of hits by covering your chin - something that casque and 3/4 style helmets do not. Flips might look very similar, but they have tendency to open upon strike unless really well made - because the hit goes up and not directly from front. At the same time it doesn't bother you much on a bicycle because speeds are low, and the ground flying right into your face is something you will instinctively protect yourself against with your arms. It's temples and a top of your head that concerns you the most now.

Thanks for another great video. And without any innuendos xD (Just came from a re-watch about the Quarterstaff.)

Wearing the helmet up is a thing in lacrosse and football here in the US as well. My teammates and I always had our helmets up when we didn't need them because it was limiting to have them down and they were a pain to carry otherwise.

Having been in the Army, I can attest to a lot of that, granted in a modern context, but some things never change

Good video Matt. Armour - or any other equipment - which is uncomfortable to wear or use tends not get used as often as it should be.

From the late 1970s to early 2000s Special Forces troops would often wear “bump” helmets. Which were skateboard/sport helmets they wore to protect their head from bumping on things.... a good example is the Delta Force soldiers in Blackhawk Down

Berets and 'side caps' were issued primarily because you had to give them something to wear (when they weren't wearing helmets), that could be stuffed under an epaulet or into a pocket when they were indoors. Other options involved a far greater risk of the soldier losing it.

Then we also have the "small" detail that a hit to the back of your head with a blunt object, fists included (however not recommended, breaking or getting a knuckle pushed back hurts) is one of the easiest ways to be rendered unconscious, and it's an area that you don't see, which makes it hard to protect actively (taking cover behind a shield, parrying, ducking, what have you) so passively protecting the back of the head and neck is in that way more important than passively protecting the throat.

That first steel helmet you wore you can clearly see where the insperation for the Uruk hai helmets got there insperartion form lord of thr rings. Very interesting video thank you. All the best Jim

As I walked back to my camp from the battlefield after a particularly hot re-enactment battle, suffering mild heat exhaustion (I confess, I may have had a tactical battlefield spew...), I can testify that trying to carry my helmet and bevor, plus my bill was really not very easy at all. Carrying your kit by wearing it is common sense!

A great video! Although i'm left a bit puzzled over the lack of mentions about debris protection. To my knowledge, that was just about the number one reason for the (re-)introduction of hard helmets.

Great points, thank for making the video.

You can even see this in modern warfare. If you watch the film "Black Hawk Down" . You'll notice some solders are wearing kevlar ballistic helmets and some, mostly the delta operators, are wearing simple bump helmets.

That ciao ragazzi made me proud of you almost perfect pronunciation!

That sallet without the pivoting visor reminds me of the corinthian helmet where they would wear it raised on their head when not in combat.

Bump helmet are still used today. Remind me of the US Delta Forces in Somali in the 1990's aka Blackhawk Down. They had a need to move fast and be lightweight so they didn't want to use GI issued helmets. However they still needed protection head trauma, getting in and out of vehicles, etc. So they used hockey helmets. Today they have special made miltary bump helmets.

Great topic, i learn more things today, thx

They seem to have been in large part about making the soldier FEEL safer, therefore more bold and willing to fight. Covering the head is about security and comfort. Of coarse protection and many other applications,but when it comes down to it, it's about the feeling of security

Always interesting commentary that covers a topic in essential detail from many angles by M. Easton. One wonders what medieval armour would have looked like had they had kevlar?

Realistic armor check penalties is something that some tabletop games implement, it makes heavy armor basically useless for an adventurer a lot of the time, which could be good, its certainly realistic, but makes the item pointless as a game piece lol. Adding the option to flip up your helmet to lower some of those penalties for a decrease in armor class bonus and then flip it back down as a swift action would be a cool addition

Xenophon recommended the Boeotian helmet as the best cavalry helmet because, as he said, it provided the best protection for all parts above the cuirass, and it allowed free vision. Of course, the Boeotian helmet doesn't actually cover the face or neck at all, though it does have a significant brim.

I fully agree with what you're saying. I went on a jog with another club member in Norman kit (as you do in your spare time) and I got pretty annoyed with the Nasal directing all my hot breath back onto my face. I've decided to cut it down a bit sometime soon.

I have a m1917A1 helmet (Brodie type to the English) and in many of the ways you desecribe it is a far more useful helmet tactically than the M1 steel or the PASGT kevlar helmets used during my time in the US Army. Interesting topic, Sir. Thank you for bringing it up.

As someone who does historically inspired Larp, I wholeheartedly agree with you. I actually started out playing with quite a lot of armor, but the longer I play, the more of it I lose. I just found I hardly ever wear a kit. I got rid of face protection quite quickly so I could breathe, drink and see properly (especially I wanted to be able to see where I put my feet) and I shed more ond more things (greaves, elbow and knee plates, gauntlets) because it is just so uncomfortable carrying this stuff with you all the time. We have a fairly large area for our events and marching to the enemy camp, standing guard, or moving around in formation tires you out really quickly with excess stuff (I also dont train that kind of thing regularly). Yes it´s neat to have in the short moments of battle, but it doesnt tend to change the overall outcome that much and can even be a negative at times when mobility is required. I´d say for anything but for going right into a battle and out, basic protection with decent mobility is much, much more desireable than full on protection with limited mobility, endurance, senses and so on.

In WW1 the steel stamped helmet was not enough in full use in entirely near the beginning of the war, the helmet was made to protect from shrapnel from mortors and other flying debris which helped change the injured/death ratio from having more injured than deaths

I have a lacrosse helmet which is kind of shaped like a Corinthian helmet, generally if you want to take a drink or talk to someone properly you take the chinstrap off and push the helmet back like a Corinthian helmet. It sits quite nicely like that although it tends to rock back and forth a bit if you nod too much. Wearing it properly makes it hard to talk because of the large chin strap and the face guard makes it hard to eat or drink. I think this is why both lacrosse and Corinthian helmets have very little proection for the back of the neck, it would make it hard to push the helmet backwards.

thanks for the insight...