i actually met a 162 driver decades ago on the airshow road. he was one of the youths --an 18 YO that was tasked to fly the 162. he only made a few flights before he was shot down by a p-51 while moving 162s to a new AB. he crash landed his jet --survived being hit by a 50bmg . ended up in the US and joined the NAVY. he said the 162 was excellent to fly IF the glue held and the engine didn't blow--yet they failed very frequently

@Flapjackbatter

3 ай бұрын

Was that Harald Bauer maybee? He was shot down while ferrying a 162. Flew for the US (don't remember wich branch) before and during Vietnam. He later did talks at airshows etc.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you for sharing that!

@obsidianjane4413

3 ай бұрын

When you have slaves building your airplanes...

@Donmusicman

3 ай бұрын

I remember reading somewhere that the glue that was used was inferior to the intended glue. The Allies had destroyed the factory that produced the glue that the Germans needed, so, they used what was available instead. That led to aircraft breakups in mid flight. Gotta say, though, it was a beautiful looking plane for the time. I had a model of it when I was a kid.

@drstrangelove4998

3 ай бұрын

You met Harald Bauer. He relates to one of the pilots who shot down a DeHavilland Meteor of 616 sq Near the Dutch border. Confirming perhaps Eric Browns prediction that the Volksjäger would run rings around the Meteor, had they met in combat.

"If the glue holds" is a terrifying qualifier of an airplane's capabilities.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Yes, somehow nuts and rivets seem far more reassuring 😁

@louisavondart9178

3 ай бұрын

The glue was fine, until the factory that made it got bombed. The new manufacturer made glue that was so toxic that it ate through the wood. That problem was remedied before production ceased and the last airframes made were perfectly reliable.

@andrslnks4804

3 ай бұрын

They glue aircrafts these days also

@scootergeorge7089

3 ай бұрын

@@andrslnks4804 - Yes, but the technology has come a long way since WWII.

@andrslnks4804

3 ай бұрын

@@scootergeorge7089 except boeing?

Eric Brown flew the 162 after the war and said it was very responsive and delightful to fly.

@ScoopsTV-History-om9mv

3 ай бұрын

He also said the p47 had a low mach limit ,he was wrong

@travelbugse2829

3 ай бұрын

@@ScoopsTV-History-om9mv Eric 'Winkle' Brown probably was flying other countries' aircraft without ordnance and not much fuel on board, so the handling characteristics would have been different. He also believed the ME 262 was a superior gun platform (less snaking) to the Gloster Meteor, which is hotly disputed these days.

@robertharper3754

3 ай бұрын

There was little at the time that he didn't fly, so he was a VERY experienced pilot to say the least, as to the pilots who had to fly the 162 during the war they weren't even close to his league.

@robertbolding4182

3 ай бұрын

That really doesn't mean anything does it

@Rudeljaeger

3 ай бұрын

He even said "it can fly circles around a Meteor". Surprisingly these quotes often result in angry seething by british (!) commenters lol

People like to hate on it, but it's obvious that if this design was manufactured in the same conditions the US/UK, with better facilities, labour force and raw materials etc., and pilots were trained properly to operate it, it would have been hard to beat. The speed advantage was massive.

@showtime112

2 ай бұрын

I agree, with proper testing and better production conditions, these fighters could have been effective for a while.

@wetleyrocks3092

Ай бұрын

If my auntie had balls she would've been my uncle

@caribman10

21 күн бұрын

Yeah, only five or six major problems to fix and everything would've been hunky-dory. Sure.

@crudboy12

19 күн бұрын

Don't forget, the Allies were also developing jet fighters at the same time, with both the US and UK having jets by this point. Even if the jets performed as designed, it wouldn't have done the Germans much good at this point in the war. The other issue with the German jets including the 262 was the difficulties they had targeting Allied bombers and other piston driven aircraft due to the large speed differential and the slow velocity guns. It took a lot of skill to make hits in the extremely limited window of time between max range and when they had to break away. Basically, the German jet program had little chance of actually stopping the strategic bomber campaign.

@off6848

11 күн бұрын

@@crudboy12the German jet engines were more advanced the Brit’s had a good engine with longer life but it quickly hit power inefficiencies whereas the German design became the basis for modern jets

This is the best history lesson ive seen so far on he 162

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you very much for that positive feedback!

@olgagaming5544

Ай бұрын

@@showtime112 Hey, do you have online access to digitalised archives of both German and Allied reports? Because for such a research, normally someone would have to sit in german archives and know german and live either in germany or somewhere in the EU and also have an access to compare the reports with Allied ones.

@showtime112

Ай бұрын

@@olgagaming5544 Afraid not. I can only rely on research done by other people (and made public).

Missing in history is the 162s used by Jg-84 and 85. They both picked up their 162s at the same time and flew in formation to their new base which is unknown. The accidently ran into an unescorted groups of American bombers and did considerable damage before they had to break off due to fuel. There is one book on Jg-85 that I have been trying to get a hold of to verify this story, but no luck yet.

@scootergeorge7089

Ай бұрын

What is the title and who is the author?

Great history lesson He 162 the facts are rarely mentions.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you for the feedback!

Another well presented and informative video

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Glad you think so! Thank you!

The animation on this video, coupled with the obvious research gone in to the history, is astounding. Incredible work. Hats off to you sir.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you very much, this is high praise indeed!

This is crazy. I was in my local modelling shop not 3 hours ago and they had a couple of Tamiya He-162s in my preferred scale of 1/48. No, I thought. Too outlandish. I will pick one up tomorrow...

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Recently, I'm getting some feedback that my videos inspire people to build certain models. I should try to approach model companies for sponsorship 😁

@micfail2

3 ай бұрын

RC or shelf jockey?

They have a complete 162 in the Berlin technical museum, as well as a 109. Was amazing.

@MsSoulProvider

2 ай бұрын

try Gatow Airport,- whole lotta goodies there too..

As a 50+ channel subscriber, how fortunate we are to have the technology to reproduce these actions so well... and by 'we' I mean our narrator, who tells these stories so engagingly and without padding. Great channel, sir.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you very much! This is a very positive feedback. I've been familiar with the simulation technology ever since the early days, the progress is quite amazing.

Thank-you for an excellent telling of the He-162, my favourite of the early jet aircraft. Despite the appalling state the Germans were in, to design, test, build and put into service this aircraft in such a short span of time was a huge achievement ~ even if Ernst Heinkel did all he could behind the scenes to ensure his aircraft won the Volksjager competition despite there being better designs presented such as the Ta-183. Proposed future iterations of the He-162 included; swept wings, forward swept wings, V tail, different engine fits including 1 or 2 pulse jets etc. Galland decried the very concept of the Volksjager, saying they should be concentrating on Me-262 production instead and the idea that barely trained Hitler Youth were to pilot what was a hot little plane were ludicrous, but Eric Brown RN said it was an exhilarating little plane to fly, would’ve run rings round the Gloster Meteor and that the Allies were lucky it hadn’t appeared earlier as in concert with the Me-262 it would have wreaked havoc on Allied bomber formations.

@earlgrey691

3 ай бұрын

German utter genius and capability is no small thing i'd vouchsafe?

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

The idea that youth with some basic training could fly this jet was one of the most optimistic ideas in history 😁 And Eric Brown seems to have had one of the coolest jobs ever! Thanks for another comment!

The fact that this sleek little jet fighter flew at the end of WW2 totally blows my mind, the ME 163 and the 262 looked different and futuristic but this one with its wing tips and jet engine on top looked really really different... That said, I wonder how the Heinkel 162 would have fared against the Gloster Meteor...

@yoschiannik8438

3 ай бұрын

Well the metor was actually operationaö whilst the 162 was rushed amd flown by surivers ir cannonfodder. I cant imagine that the woukd have scored a singel kill against a metor whils losing atleast a hanfull of aircraft to accidents

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

I suppose nobody was yet sure how the future of fighter design would look like to everyone tried a different approach. The thing with an engine on top didn't catch on 😁 It is a shame that Meteor never faced the German jets.

@jeromewagschal9485

3 ай бұрын

@@showtime112 That makes sense, it was such a new type of technology nobody knew where things would go from there...

@mikedearing6352

3 ай бұрын

Victory would go to the best pilot in this comparison I think because both aircraft were very capable, one was faster while the other had much greater range, various combat scenarios would favor one aircraft over the other. I'd think the me262 might have manovering and some speed advantage and that by itself is often a deciding factor but... having more fuel, more flying time, can be decisive as well depending on a few other factors.

@yoschiannik8438

3 ай бұрын

@@mikedearing6352 Skill means nothing when your wings fall off if you try to turn...

Absolutely loved this one! I'll revisit and watch again..several times, as I find the air war over Europe to be most interesting. For me anyway. Fantastic video!

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

I'm happy to hear that you enjoyed it so much! Happy re-watch 😁

A really interesting piece of military history. So thank you very much

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you for watching and commenting!

So happy to have found your channel mate! Great presentation, super informative too! Looking forward to binging your content this weekend. Keep up the great work, God speed!

@showtime112

20 күн бұрын

I'm glad you did. I hope you like other content too and that there are plenty more people like you 😁

Excellent video, content and commentary. Thanks

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it! Thank you!

That it flew as well as it did is a miracle in itself. Especially when one considers the circumstances of its manufacturer. A good showing of its history in action.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Yes, the odds were not in its favor. Thank you for commenting!

Excellent video. Love your honest presentation of the research blended with the simulation of the events.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you very much for the positive feedback! That is essentially what I go for.

Another fine production in the books. Keep on keeping on, Showtime112.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

I'm happy to hear it, thank you!

I have often wondered about how effective the German ejection seats were in use.

@MrOlgrumpy

3 ай бұрын

So did the pilots --

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Well, it was brand new technology and it could work under favorable circumstances. Perhaps in those cases the pilot might have just bailed out without the ejection seat but I'm sure that it increased the chances for survival.

@notmenotme614

3 ай бұрын

The way I see it, the pilots would have no chance of survival without the ejector seat. With the seat, they had a small chance. A small chance is better than no chance.

@williamzk9083

3 ай бұрын

Heinkel remained in charge of ejection seat development through the war. Ejection seat was standard on all German test aircraft. Perhaps a dozen ejections occurred on service He 219 and I believe some crew on the He 177 had them. They were on the whole quite successful. They were not automatic. The canopy had to be manually ejected, feet placed in stirrups and then ejection initiated. Parachute had to be manually deployed. -in modern zero zero ejection seats canopy is ejected automatically, feet retracted by straps into stirrups, ejection completed, parachute extracted by rocked and parachute instantly inflated by explode charge. -The geometric seats, at least got you out of the aircraft

Vrdeo of a rare slice of ww2 history. Thanks!

@showtime112

2 ай бұрын

Thank you for the positive feedback!

Thanks for these great video! My grand unkle was at the 1. Jagdgeschwader and was trained on the "Volksjäger" he liked it but told not to pull the flightstick too strong at the start.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you for appreciating it and for sharing a personal relation. That agrees with what I've read, maneuvering the He-162 at low speeds should have been very careful.

Another good video Showtime 112.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thanks, I'm glad you liked this one too!

Great Job with this video! Much appreciated! I knew so little coming in and left feeling like i am ready to lookup more about this amazing time of the launch of the age of the single engine jet fighter age!

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you very much for the comment!

The He-162's didn't get many kills, but the squadron was new, the planes were not well tested before deliveries started so they had a lot of teething problems. It had an impressive armament package, but with really only two months to train, and constantly changing air fields, not much time to achieve anything.

@heneagedundas

3 ай бұрын

Only 1 kill claimed and that was given to a flak crew, so yes, not many.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

The odds were pretty bad, nobody can deny that. Thanks for another comment!

@louisavondart9178

3 ай бұрын

It only had 2x 20mm cannons.

@czwarty7878

3 ай бұрын

@@louisavondart9178 Just like Spitfire, Bf-109, La-7 or Fw190D. It wasn't weak armament, especially since German 20mm shells were more powerful than others, and in this aircraft the guns were centerline instead of wing-mounted which always increased effectiveness. The real problem was abysmal amount of ammunition (barely 120 rounds per gun, while typical loadout of WWII fighter would be 200 rounds)

An obviously well researched video - thank you !

@showtime112

Ай бұрын

Thank you for appreciating it!

The speed with which this aircraft was produced is often commented upon. It's worth looking through Heinkel designs to find that a larger plane with similar layout existed in the form of calculations and drawings of basic airframe design, more than a drawing, less than a prototype. Like with the existing North American A-36 Apache becoming the P-51 Mustang, this shortened development enormously.

The glue thing is easily explained, the original Tego Film glue factory had just been bombed flat, and so a substitute called Kaurit, which was more subject to moisture, sometimes causing failure.

This is the first video of the He-162 i ever seen. Well done video.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you very much. There is a bunch of other videos but they focus on other aspects of this type.

Nice video. Excellent graphics.

@showtime112

2 ай бұрын

Thank you for the feedback!

Amazing vid as always

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it, thanks!

I can’t tell you how much I love this channel..The great history and video fits perfectly together..Also this channel comes at a direct way of telling the facts about an aircraft or a conflict..Keep up the great work and will you do a part 2 on the Romanian Airforce during WW2..If not the Airforce of Hungry would be great to watch..Thank you🇬🇧👍

@showtime112

Ай бұрын

Thank you very much for such an awesome comment! I will cover more of the Romanian Air Force in the future but I'm not sure when exactly.

Absolutely lovely that yoh work in even something with little service record ae the He-162. Bravo.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Basically, in case such as this you cover many details which you would skip with an aircraft with a bigger combat record 😁 Thank you for another comment!

@FRIEND_711

3 ай бұрын

@@showtime112 of course and always! I love watching your videos and i absolutely love them.

Thanks again for this bit of obscure history.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you for watching!

Capt. Eric Brown loved the handling of the He162, saying it would ‘run rings around a Gloster Meteor jet, had they met in combat. In fact his prediction came true, when a Meteor from 616sq was shot down over the Dutch border by a Volksjäger in the last days of the war.

@AB-mw8oz

16 күн бұрын

No Meteors were shot down in air to air combat in WW2. The Meteors themselves were highly restricted on what they were permitted to do, From their introduction in the summer of 1944 they were primarily for home defense against V-1s. AS 1945 rolled around several were moved to bases in Belgium, they had destroyed over 40 aircraft in ground attack operations by the time the war had ended, but not once had they ever shot down another aircraft in air to air combat, and wouldn't see any air to air losses until the Korean War against Russian and Chinese MiGs Brown's View is also not as one sides as you say. He described the He162 as "built by a modelling enthusiast" due to the mostly wooden structure "great to fly but a handful on take-off and landing" "controls were as good as any he’d encountered, they could easily be mis-handled"

Great story. The unknown episodes of WW2. Thanks for sahring it with us

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you for watching!

Glad you did this assessment,one of my favourite late German aircraft tbh what other late war types you got plans to showcase next and keep up the good work buddy ??

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for the feedback! There will probably be something about Me-163.

50k -- look at you. Congrats, friend. On to 100k.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

I used to think that youtubers with 25 K were big shots. Doesn't seem so anymore 😁 Anyway, thanks for the wishes!

Thanks for showing this plane. Interesting trivia

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you for watching!

Heinkel HE 162 auch genannt der Volksjäger! Billig hergestellt, viel Sperrholz und auch schwer zu fliegen.

Excellent video. Subscribed.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you very much, I appreciate it!

15:58 France flight tested a trio of He-162s in 1946-1948. At my birthplace: Mont de Marsan, south-west France. BA.118 Colonel Rozanoff, nowadays they fly Rafales (the base also got the first Mirage IVA nuclear bombers in October 1964). Whatever Eric Brown said of the He-162, french pilots hated the machine. There was one fatal accident mid 1948 after what the type was grounded. France used the type as a trainer to familiarize pilots with the coming jet fighters: Vampires and Ouragans.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you for sharing the info, it's quite interesting.

Another great video! The volksjäger is an interesting subject. I personally thought that its performance was much worse. In any case, a curious little plane that tried to push the envelope.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thanks! I agree, such airplanes with their flaws and everything can sometimes be even more interesting than those which were just unbeatable.

I really love the design. Unique plane designs are fun.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Unique is the word, nothing quite like it appeared ever again.

Great work!

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thanks for the visit Chups!

Having seen the plane in a Berlin museum, it is scary. To get into that is. Wood and a BMW unreliable engine. The ejection seat is supposed to stop you going into the jet engine, but no hope at low altitude.

@jamesrogers5783

3 ай бұрын

it looks quite "spidery" to me as well. those spindly tail surfaces don't inspire much confidence , nor does the engine placement. or that its made of wood held together with wood glue --heat and wood glue ?? bad combo

@pg259

3 ай бұрын

@@jamesrogers5783 Yeah--like the Mosquito and we all know that was a very bad plane, wasn´t it?

@jamesrogers5783

3 ай бұрын

the mossie was not jet powered and the brits had much better glue@@pg259

@edsmale

3 ай бұрын

@@pg259different glue, vastly different construction skill.

@JoeJ94611

3 ай бұрын

@@edsmale I recall reading the preferred glue manufacturer's factory was badly damaged in an Allied air raid.

Again very good video.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you very much!

Nice video 👍

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thanks 👍

Great video

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you very much!

Another good video about lesser known Luftwaffe aircraft.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you for the positive feedback!

Great video! Will you be doing any more on the Falklands war? There are the two Etendard Exocet attacks on the MV Atlantic Conveyer and HMS Sheffield, The ground attack where a Harrier GR3 was shot down and the shootdown of the C130 by Sharky Ward in a Sea Harrier. Be great to see more :)

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you1 There are certainly plans to cover Falklands some more. The problem is that there's so much stuff to cover and not enough time to do it all 😁

I'd love to see similar videos on the subject of American-made carrier based fighters (i.e. the Wildcat/Martlet, the Hellcat and the Corsair) vs. Luftwaffe land-based fighters. So far I haven't come across even a single instance of an encounter, let alone any combat or comparisons. The FAA fighters were deployed in nothern European waters, e.g. the Tirpitz raids, where they didn't actually encounter any Luftwaffe fighter opposition. Also, accounts of the Fulmar vs. German single engine fighters.

Nicely researched of a obscure airplane, I liked the camme scheme of the french one at the end.

@dominiqueroudier9401

3 ай бұрын

After war french air force tested 3 he162. Between 1947 and 1948. Unfortunately one test pilot crashed Just after takeoff in field near Mont de Marsan AB. 2 others plane were send to FAF mechanics school. Now one of two is display at Musée de l'air Paris Le bourget

@RealDarko

3 ай бұрын

@@dominiqueroudier9401 Thanks for the info!

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thanks! I thought an Allied skin would be a nice touch, representing the post-war testing phase in the airplane's life.

Grwat video. Subbed...👍

@showtime112

24 күн бұрын

Thank you very much!

One word...WOW!!!! Great job!

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you very much for this positive feedback!

This people fighter is very fascinating. Thx for this great video once again :)

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you for appreciating it!

The Thunderbolt misidentification is funny, in the same way Allied ground troops often identified every German tank as a Tiger. The Thunderbolt was by far the meanest machine alive over Europe, and it's no wonder "Thunderbolt Fright" has taken hold among the Luftwaffe.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

I think a similar thing was happening during the Battle of Britain when German pilots were always shot down by Spitfires and rarely ever by Hurricanes :)

@GeneralJackRipper

2 ай бұрын

@@showtime112 Very good point sir.

Nice one.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thanks! Glad you liked it!

Thank YOU for this extraordinary and brilliant video ! It's very Special and for me,as a german,now I know the last day's of this jet experiment of the LUFTWAFFE !! Good Job,well done!! 😊

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

I really appreciate your positive feedback!

Imagine you're a successful German fighter pilot and you receive the news that your squadron is being re-equipped with brand new aircraft. Then you see the new aircraft and it's a flimsy deathtrap with a giant engine strapped on to the fuselage.

At the very least, the Salamander tried to demonstrate the ejection seat. It is a pity that this is not recognised today. Nevertheless, excellent reportage!

@showtime112

17 күн бұрын

True, these are some of the first ejections in history. Thanks for the feedback!

Amazing video. I love the music in particular. Very atmospheric. Look up Harald Bauer's presentation on serving as a test pilot for the He-162. It's called: Heinkel He 162 Jet Fighter Test Pilot 20 minutes 40 seconds in, he claims, one of the He 162 shot down a British Meteor in may 1945. And another He 162 shot down a British fighter too around that time also.

Your visual suggestion at the end is intriguing. Did the French capture, paint, and fly some 162s?!?

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Yes, France, UK, USA and USSR all tested He-162 after the war.

@byronbreese3454

3 ай бұрын

Ah, I see, as in tested. I knew the US etc captured and tested, but not France. I remember when the A-10 emerged how it's basic design, albeit with two engines, reminded me of the 162. @@showtime112

It's a very clever simple design.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

It was generally not bad but it really needed more testing.

@lappodude

10 күн бұрын

nah, it was total useless.

Nice video! Which game did you use?

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

War Thunder

Bela animação e trabalho histórico, bom trabalho

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Muito obrigado!

Nice video, thx. It is always awesome to get the actual stories from the unit flight logs and compare them tot the ones from the other side! I also built the Revell's model kit when I was a kid and had always thought that the plane made at least some sort of impact, but achieving measly one confirmed kill with couple of losses due to enemy action, plus all the "self-inflicted" losses, makes you REALLY wonder if the resources used to design and build the 300+ of these could've been used WAY better... Obviously that comment comes with hindsight, but wasn't this a bit of a common problem in 3rd Reich? Spending scant resources on trying to get better and better wunderwaffe after wunderwaffe when reliable more standard equipment had been already available from some time and would've been a way better an option to stick with them and increase their production?

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you for the feedback! Yes, German resources probably could have been spent better but the airplane itself wasn't bad. It just needed some more time to mature as it was clearly rushed into service.

what game was used to record the footage? thanks

@showtime112

Ай бұрын

War Thunder

You should do a video about the me 323 gigant

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Sadly, it's not available in the sims I use.

There is one in the Canada Aviation and Space Museum in Ottawa, Canada. Quite an interesting aircraft. The jet engine was a BMW if I remember well. Was it the first WW2 aircraft to have an ejection seat?

The SALAMANDER, was built in a hurry, with a mix of wood and aluminium and the turbojet of the ME-262 which was ready. It was easy to produce and cheap, it's was very important at the end of the war. But it need more time to be well developped, unfortunatly it was the end the war, and the accident arrived very often. 320 was produced on 1945, this is an exploit in so little time !!!

@dominiqueroudier9401

3 ай бұрын

L armée de l'air en à récupérer 3 et tester à Mont de Marsan entre 47 et 48. Malheureusement un pilote d'essai s'est planté dans un champ 3km après décollage. Un des 2 restant est exposé au musée de l'air du Bourget. J'ai même la photo !!!. J'en ai vu un autre,. Me rappelle plus si c'était à IWM de Hendon ou Duxford. Par contre le me 262 c'est Hendon. J'ai pu le...toucher

@jeannezehner9450

3 ай бұрын

@@dominiqueroudier9401 C'est une invention dans l'urgence de fin de guerre. Mais c'est une prouesse technique réalisée en un minimum de temps qui a été bien pensée. Cependant arrivant trop tard pour faire quoi que ce soit, elle fut oubliée comme beaucoup d'autres. Il aurait fallu qu'elle soit mise au point en 42, là elle aurait pu faire faire mal aux bombardiers alliés.

@dominiqueroudier9401

3 ай бұрын

@@jeannezehner9450 Par contre sais pas si plus fiable que le Me 262. Par contre manque de pilotes expérimentés. Les 3 exemplaires captures ont permis aux pilotes du CEV de se faire la main avant de recevoir le premier lot de Vampire. Et c'est bien que à la fin de la vidéo il en a mis un aux couleurs de l,AA

@paulwoodman5131

3 ай бұрын

The turbo jet engine they put in that was a marvel and it needed better metals that they didn't have access to, but time between overall was probably very short as the allies soon discovered in their testing. If they didn't have a good supply of parts , they had to park them. But interesting to see as the Reich collapsed what they held on to and were they ended up.

@jeannezehner9450

3 ай бұрын

@@dominiqueroudier9401 Le ME-262 a deux turboréacteurs, c'est mieux, mais c'est tout, et puis il y avait le problème des pilotes expérimentés en fin de guerre.

It was a revolutionary jet fighter but the glue used to hold it together wasn't reliable. Furthermore, the He-162 arrived too late in the war...

I remember it being stated that a top German Ace was allowed to see one of the first 162s off the line. He said it would be an excellent aircraft, small, with excellent armament, in the hands of an experienced pilot would be a fine aircraft to shoot down Allied bombers. [If the aircraft could have been manufactured to the standards and numbers that Heinkel proposed, it could have delayed the end of the war. There was even talk of giving it swept wings to increase performance a bit more.]

It's still a lovely looking aircraft.

What sim or game do you use? I'm not sure!

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

It's War Thunder

Although I find his accent fatiguing, I do appreciate his pronunciation of German words and names. Also, as to the computer animation, I believed that I would hate it. But I loved it. In my youth, the late 1950's, there were library books. Very few photographs of World War II aircraft and other equipment. That is why I got into plastic kit modeling. I wanted to see a Junkers Ju 88 from different angles. Also, it was the beginning of black and white TVs with rabbit ears (antennae) and very iffy reception. There were 3 TV stations with limited broadcasting hours: WBBM (CBS channel 2), WMAQ (NBC channel 5) and WBKB (ABC channel 7). And a little bit of WGN (independent channel 9) and WTTW (independent non-profit channel 11). They were VHF. When UHF came out, there was WFLD (channel 32) and 'WSNW?' (channel 44). I could at times receive a station from Milwaukee(?) and watch true bull fights! That was at about two in the morning and with the right atmospherics. And, no computers! Can you believe it!!! Thanks for the memories. I have short attention span. In those days, especially over the summer, I would watch the TV in my bedroom and the one down the hall in my older brother's bedroom, for the at home local ball team (Cubs or Sox, White, that is) and a national broadcast on channel 5 NBC ("Game of the Week"). I would have one radio on to the local pop music station (WIND, WGN, WLS, I don't remember). I would also have two other radios, one tuned to the local team that was out of town and one to a 'national' game. I would usually score the at home game. And I would also be reading a book. And during the week, the Cubs might be available, they never played night games at home. All pitchers batted and there were 8 teams in each league, including the Milwaukee Braves, New York Giants and Brooklyn Dodgers. Depending upon the season there was the NFL and later the AFL. The Chicago Cardinals were my favorite team. And the Bears played at Wrigley Field. Go Ollie Matson and Rick Casares! There was no basketball in Chicago and the Chicago Blackhawks' home games were never broadcast on TV. Go Stan Mikita! At 77 with multiple strokes and other happy events, I acknowledge that my memory is faulty. But that's my story and I'm sticking to it! Thank you for your efforts. May you and yours stay well and prosper.

I'd have expected the aircraft to be very noise with that engine immediately behind the pilot. Surprised to learn it wasn't.

Thank you

@showtime112

21 күн бұрын

Thank you for watching!

I’ve been lucky enough to see two of these rare aircraft, one at the RAF Museum and the other at the Imperial War Museum.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

I envy you 😁

Records seem to vary somewhat but it appears that the He 162 shot down at least 6 and maybe as high as 8 Allied aircraft they lost more than that due to accidents on landing or trying to eject

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

From what I could find in the books that specifically deal with the subject, there's only that one questionable claim plus another one rumored kill but I didn't mention that one as there's no detail at all.

@brucemacaulay1235

3 ай бұрын

@@showtime112 Just read Adolf Dickfeld Footsteps of the Hunter and he claimed to shoot down a P-47 with his HE 162 page 187. Book can be found on SCRIB at no cost.

Luftwaffe pilots are like allied infantry substituting every tank is a Tiger with every aircraft is a Thunderbolt...

"Our training is restricted to 600 kts (about 360 mph) because the plywood wings are glued together and may come apart." "We lost 7 planes before we ever got off a shot at an enemy plane." "We traded in our FW-190s for THIS?"

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Well, you could say that the project needed more time to mature 😁

Was this created using Il-2 combat sim???

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

No, it is War Thunder.

I've always felt it is an aircraft that never got a fair chance. It needed time to debug and train on.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

That's true, the game was rigged against it.

The Tempest pilot Spawn camping makes me sad

GREAT VIDEO, as usual. Preserving history alive and paying tribute to those pilotos who dared to fly and fight for their country. They are flying higher now than during those days. THANKS.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Thank you once again! Apart from the historical significance, I find the mindset of the people involved a fascinating subject as well.

excellent performance terrifying build quality

This airplane looks so cool.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

It's got uniqueness for sure.

what game are the visuals from, one of the IL2 series?

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

It's War Thunder

Interesting !

This aircraft was a joy to fly in FlightGear.

Hello again mate. Just send you by mail , link about "french " he162. Thank you to show at end of vidéo this plane with french roundels.🇲🇫 3 are used ,1 crashed. Other in display at musée de l'air Paris le bourget. In UK , seen in IWM Hendon or Duxford

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

I've seen the mail, thank you! I thought it was interesting to use one of the Allied skins at the end to illustrate the final chapter in the type's operational use - testing (usually, it's just the first chapter)

@russellmarriott9396

3 ай бұрын

There is one currently under restoration at Duxford.

@dominiqueroudier9401

3 ай бұрын

​@@russellmarriott9396yes i have seen it in 2019. In France another display at musée de l'air Paris le bourget exécutive airport ( Paris airshow)

What game is this footage from?

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

War Thunder

the typhoon pilot was probably what the heck was that?

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

I wouldn't describe it as a very pleasant experience 😁

Hello mate, rare plane, and infos also. Used short time in combat. Dont know if have some kills. Switch immédiately on TV hd

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

Hi! It's a very rare plane and only used in the final days of WW2. For some reason, this particular period is fascinating me lately :)

With stats like that I have to wonder if the Squadron would have fared better if they'd been able to keep their FW190s?

What Sim did you use to make this?

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

War Thunder

@derekcoaker6579

3 ай бұрын

@@showtime112 Cool, thanks. That's one I haven't really got into yet, but it looks fantastic. The grind keeps me away I think. I can't spend that kind of money to skip it lol. Really cool Channel, appreciate it.

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

@@derekcoaker6579It can be frustrating, that's for sure. The trick is to think of the grind as the journey and not just focus on the goal (whatever airplane you want to unlock)

What flight-sim is this?

@showtime112

3 ай бұрын

War Thunder