This video looks primarily at brigade and divisional howitzer artillery in the Russian Army. If you'd like a video on other types of artillery, like regimental howitzers or rocket artillery, leave a comment!

@VagabondZeroSix

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, please.

@magnagermania9311

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, something about the bundeswehr, thegerman army, would be much appreciated!

@goncalofferreira331

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, please.

@DanialTarik

2 жыл бұрын

video on Indian Artillery

@muhammadhilmi7590

2 жыл бұрын

Sure,why not? 😊

Excellent content as always. It's nice to see how non-NATO forces are organizing their units and you're one of the best sources on youtube for that kind of stuff.

@menacereconnaissance7406

2 жыл бұрын

without a doubt

@arthas640

2 жыл бұрын

It's fun seeing how other countries do it since so many countries either purposefully or inadvertently copy NATO in many ways thanks to cultural influence, foreign training, or lack of modern combat experience

@arthas640

2 жыл бұрын

@Kenneth Johnson at what point did anyone state that? You need to be subtle with your snuck premise, you cant just drop it like a turd in a swimming pool.

@madcio

2 жыл бұрын

@Kenneth Johnson Ahh, self-admitted spammer and nutter. Go away.

@davidh.6930

2 жыл бұрын

This aged like milk xD

There are two types of people, artillerymen and targets (Yes I will comment slightly relevant wargame quotes whenever I can)

@BattleOrder

2 жыл бұрын

Seem on-brand

@stanisawnielepkowicz1881

2 жыл бұрын

Or "Artillery ads dignity, to what would otherwise be an ugly brawl" which I find very funny since it's the artillery that takes away all the dignity from any kind of fights.

@roguevirus

2 жыл бұрын

It's not MY war.

@yuval5628

2 жыл бұрын

Two jobs, grunts and support.

@TheTrueAdept

2 жыл бұрын

@@stanisawnielepkowicz1881 That is attributed to Fredrick der Grosse (Fredrick the Great/Fredrick the Second) of Prussia. ;)

I never realized how complicated the process of calling in a fire mission is. I've always thought its a FO talking to a Platoon commander, but nope there's an entire chain to it

@Sol_Invictus510

2 жыл бұрын

Especially with all the deconfliction that needs to be considered these days. Between air and the always reliable host nation forces, it seems there’s a lot of room for procedures to be implemented.

@oxygenenjoyer1

2 жыл бұрын

I had a friend who was a forward observer in Afghanistan for a year and one time he went through the entire fire support request operation with 2 of us and yeah, it's way more complicated than what you see in movies.

@burningsinner1132

2 жыл бұрын

You should consider the fact that in Russia, there are a lot of levels of artillery on different chains of command. MSTA-S uses long chain, Peony requires high command autorization for special payload, but stuff like Akatsiya is infantry-level, belongs to the unit it rolls with and bossed around on same level as any BMP it reinforces.

@nickkorkodylas5005

2 жыл бұрын

Depends on how many fucks you give. In Checnhya blind shots are fair game.

@burningsinner1132

2 жыл бұрын

@@nickkorkodylas5005 There is no "Chechnya" when it comes to artillery. There is only YVO ("Yuzhniy Voennyi Okrug", Southern Military district).

"God is on the side with the best artillery" -Napoleon Bonaparte

@inkognitou6982

2 жыл бұрын

False quote - Napoleon never said anything like that.

@RedboRF

2 жыл бұрын

@@inkognitou6982 you definitely followed Napoleon his entire life, 24/7

@andershoel78

2 жыл бұрын

Say that to Suvorov. Who beated Mcdonald in Napoleons army in northern Italy. (After passing the alpes on foot) He never losed a battle.

@RedboRF

2 жыл бұрын

@@andershoel78 can confirm. and actually he invented the battalion (column) tactics, which Napoleon took / adopted from him. most underrated general in entire history.

@andershoel78

2 жыл бұрын

@@RedboRF Even Hitler copied his organisation and taktics. His parrents was from Sweden, under the name Suvor, in Russia it became Suvorov. And its also explane why its named the great fatherland war in Russia, and not WW1 and WW2. It was a way for the rojal families in europe, to try to take back power from the communists, thru Hitler. One other thing history dont mention, is there was a lot of Swedes that imigrated east in this time.

>Talks about nuclear artillery shells >shows Kyiv >ok Vladimir.

@MonMalthias

2 жыл бұрын

*Azov battalion flying swastika and NATO flags* *Sacred War anthem intensifies*

@venomsoul1147

2 жыл бұрын

@@MonMalthias Hell, i hope not!

@MonMalthias

2 жыл бұрын

@@venomsoul1147 The coup regime in Kyiv should stop revising its history to teach lessions lionising the Galician Nazi collaborators then! Village burners, rapists, torturers the lot of them. And those neo-Nazi paramilitaries should be disbanded and disarmed, if not arrested. Particularly Azov.

@user-ou9qd9no5n

2 жыл бұрын

@@venomsoul1147 do not listen to him, he talks about Ukrainian punishers, hiding behind the backs of civilians, placing his artillery in the courtyards of Donetsk residents, shooting down civilian planes. And yes, Bandera was against the Nazis and the Communists, in contrast to the Russian General Vlasov with 300k to the army of Nazi associates.

@venomsoul1147

2 жыл бұрын

​@@user-ou9qd9no5n And so? Bandera has third-class person without any achivments. Vlasov has just traitor. No one better of those. Dont known pro-vlasov forces exist anywhere today. Answer me please, why Berlin hasnt notes about battles aganist oun-upa? And lisen, you mean some civil-war forces better than others? I asume any modern war - just cash investment, no-matter-wthat-cost. Just dig to beneficiaries.

Did anybody else notice we just received a crash course into artillery warfare here? Napoleon be proud... I think I learned in under 10 minutes way more than my entire life to this point...

@markusz4447

2 жыл бұрын

I guess if Napoleon would have had the 152mm howitzers, he'd won at waterloo haha

@TheAdriyaman

2 жыл бұрын

Too bad you wont be needing the information unless you're a battery commander

@firstconsul7286

2 жыл бұрын

@@markusz4447 If he had good howitzers at all, Wellington's backslope would have meant nothing.

GRAU: How many hwitzers would you like Comrade Shoigu? Russian MoD: *YeS*

@chieftainofthemoroccosindi1685

2 жыл бұрын

Read about new - Coalition-SV

@altxodorednovember6920

2 жыл бұрын

@worldoftancraft не ГРУ, а ГРАУ. Или русский язык не родной?

The animations that went along with the explanation of tactics used is AMAZING. Please continue to do this.

It's said that the artillery is the king of the battlefield, and infantry is the queen. We all know what king does to the queen..

@Someone-jz5pl

2 жыл бұрын

It pounds her

@personbob8691

2 жыл бұрын

@@Someone-jz5pl can u not say that pls

@mochiisntbad6762

2 жыл бұрын

@@personbob8691 TIME FOR SOME GROUND POUNDING - A Vtuber

@elusive6119

2 жыл бұрын

"Artillery is the god of war," said French General Jean Batiste Vaquet de Griboval. Especially 203mm with nuclear shells, you can't hide, you can't protect yourself. If they are closer than 40 km, just run, but you will still just die already tired. Artillery is not only 152-mm, but also 122-mm self-propelled amphibious guns. And 120-240-mm mortars, which are capable of throwing a 100-kiloton mine directly into your trench. If you can't knock them out first, you're already dead. And you can't, because there are too many air defense systems there. You can't suppress them with your artillery, because you haven't had anything like this for a long time, you relied too much on aviation.

@lancereyes5645

2 жыл бұрын

@@mochiisntbad6762 **hic**

Other militaries : Sir, we must locate the enemy in the target area and destroy it! Russians : Sir why not destroy THE target area?

@tando6266

2 жыл бұрын

Laughs in Donetsk airport

@PyromaN93

2 жыл бұрын

-Do you see grid sqare sergeant? -Yes. -I don't want it. *TOS-1 angry noises*

@elusive6119

2 жыл бұрын

@@tando6266 240мм

@vladimirtherussian166

2 жыл бұрын

@@tando6266 lmao so true

@chieftainofthemoroccosindi1685

2 жыл бұрын

@@PyromaN93 Tos-2*

I was a loader on Msta-S in 2013-2014 and I learned more about the organizational structure in this video than in 1.5 years of service!

@Kon_Chen_i

2 жыл бұрын

You turned out in disbat or very often on guba? Coz since 2008 time of service is one year.

@vasiliynikiforov1976

2 жыл бұрын

@@Kon_Chen_i probably he's peace da ball.

@vasiliynikiforov1976

2 жыл бұрын

Or was kicked out of contract ))

@Kon_Chen_i

2 жыл бұрын

@@vasiliynikiforov1976 с контракта уйти та ещё проблема. Скорее первый вариант.

@vasiliynikiforov1976

2 жыл бұрын

@@Kon_Chen_i с контракта могут вышвырнуть за неподобающее поведение. Не так ли? )

Ah yes, exactly what i need at 9pm.

@BattleOrder

2 жыл бұрын

Yes

The little Pacman icon for the Mess section is adorable, an I want it to be a real thing

@GeneralCalculus

2 жыл бұрын

It's real. Or at least it's included in list about/of tactical symbols I've sitting in my computer

I think your best video so far. Just awesome. Would love to see similar videos on American and Chinese artillery and then maybe to conclude the series an overview of similarities, differences, strengths and weaknesses. Once again, awesome content!

Tactical nukes are my second favorite kind, after recreational.

@sovietred7371

2 жыл бұрын

The difference between NATO and Russian nukes Russia wants to use small yield nukes to figh against enemy infantry units, where Nato wants to use it to blow up civilian populations, hence why Russia said "fine, I make biggest nuke then"

@bryanmartinez6600

2 жыл бұрын

@@sovietred7371 funny how they halved the size of the Tzar Bomba and it still spooked them.

@obscureoccultist9158

2 жыл бұрын

@@sovietred7371 I don't know why your trying to differentiate between tactical and strategic nukes. Tactical nukes are just as fully capable of wiping out large civilian population centers like any other strategic nuclear warhead. The main difference between strategic and tactical nukes are its dispersal system. Tactical nukes are deployed on the divisional level. Strategic nukes are deployed at the strategic level with heavy involvement in its deployment by the national government.

Seems like the perfect video to ask a repeated question: Where did part 2 of the soviet artillery in ww2 video go? Will it be back?

@BattleOrder

2 жыл бұрын

The arguments in it were flawed so I unlisted it.

@TheAdronio

2 жыл бұрын

@@BattleOrder Do you have a list of which arguments were flawed and in what way? It would be very interesting to learn from that.

One of your best videos so far. Congrats

@BattleOrder

2 жыл бұрын

I appreciate it!

Good video, but not 100% precise. Firstly, any battery has an organic supply section of two to three trucks (I've forgot exact number). Second, battery commander has a direct link with his battery FDC, he don't really need a battalion commander to translate his orders to his own battery. If a battery in a direct support with a company, the battery CP is only translating his orders to the battalion CP to keep it informed of it's actions, ammo comsumption and overall intelligence, and receive orders from it in case of, say, immediate concentrated fire of the battalion. Generally it's depends on plan of artillery employment which is called a fire plan (it's beyond the scope of just some preliminary barrages)

@aleksandrhellgate7396

2 жыл бұрын

Ты чё тут барабанишь? Эх..

@user-tc9sk4ei9y

2 жыл бұрын

​@@aleksandrhellgate7396 Эта хуйня еще в рассекреченных американских мануалах 80х годов про советскую армию написана, блогеры их просто сами не читают. Тоже мне блджад военная тайна

@aleksandrhellgate7396

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-tc9sk4ei9y Ну и что? Барабанишь то, зачем? Типа в надежде, что по головке погладят? Мол: Гуд Теодор, гуд!

Amazing production quality, and good info. Great job!

The quality and graphics of this video are great, by the way. And the footage is always helpful for visualisation.

Great job. Keep up!

Great job as always!

Love the detail you go into in your videos !

Amazing documentary....I was an infantry guy and never thought alot about artillery but your segment explains their roll perfectly....thanks

Fantastic job as always

WOW Man that was very interesting You did your homework! Well done! Very informative and clear without boring me

at 04:08 of the video this man have a shot of Russian artillery dropping tactical nuke on a Kiev... the video is dated 27 aug 2021 ... this man had deep understanding way in advance ... visionary.

@iplaygames8090

11 ай бұрын

Or he simply was up tp date with happening. The war in ukraine isnt new, it was happening since 2014.

Очень интересно и крайне наглядно. Лайк. Однако слабо раскрыто присутствие и работа реактивной артиллерии, которая занимает не меньшее значение в российской военной доктрине. Странно видеть, что на дистанциях более 40 км используются тактические ракеты, так как там все ещё можно использовать ракетную артиллерию.

@user-zc8is5rv8b

2 жыл бұрын

Это просто ошибка автора.

@user-no1nj9ji1d

2 жыл бұрын

Автор западник, а потому ошибки, неточная или исковерканная информация и банальная ложь будут присутствовать в обязательном порядке.

@user-zz6ov3nj6l

2 жыл бұрын

Отличное видео. Автор ВСЕ правильно показал. Автор ВСЕ правильно понимает. Автор правильно думает. Пусть так и будет... Пока противник рисует карты, мы меняем ландшафты...

@user-zc8is5rv8b

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-zz6ov3nj6l 🤗

@aleksandrhellgate7396

2 жыл бұрын

Он как раз о ствольной артиллерии говорил. Про реактивную обещает рассказать если комментов понапишут. А так то грамотный автор

4:06 tactical nuking Kyiv before it was cool.

Great stuff! Thanks for all the info.

Amazing editing my guy. I struggle with presentations and i appreciate your skills.

@BattleOrder

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks mate

This is a lot of good level intel, I learned a lot.

hand down the best video in its kind i want to see more like this

This video was so good. A lot of very good information

This is awesome Thank you.

Потрясающая работа, спасибо!

Always a good thing when you have Arti as your friend. Nice vid! Greets, T.

👍👍 Always look forward to seeing these presentations. Would you be able or interested, in doing a new video on Russian BTG/Battle Tactical Group? Considering current events, such info could prove very informative for many. Thank you for your time!

Finally! A video/content creator that shows a diagram of how a Artillery unit is organized, its job, and how a battle order would work (pun not intended) other youtuber with the same content that I Have seen usually verbally speak it out with little or no diagram. But here you highlighted how it work and I like that as im a very visual learner! You earned yourself a subscriber! Im check your channel for video over Nato Artillery units and both Nato and non Nato tank units! Thank you! It only took years for YT algorithm to recommend your channel on my feed 🤣 should have done it soon, but also my curiosity too, im very picky and judge a video of its Thumbnail! To many of those fake "real US military news" channels if you know what I mean, using a computerzied robotic narrator! Makes me reluctant to try new channels, but again yours is great, different, and actually put work into it and research. Not hastily produced with fake or inaccurate facts/thumbnails for the sole purpose of only likes and subs!

Moar artillery! This is both a request for you to do more videos on modern artillery, as well as just a general sentiment.

whther its an old vid or a new vid how you and your team produce such detail is off the charts- tbh I check your org tables before I read news about conflict overseas to be real- once I know the numbers and listen to the "top story" I can easily determine what is up so yeah u do really good stuff besides my pixel troopen military applications :)

Thank you for this excellent content

That feel when foreign youtuber makes videos about russian army better than our own youtubers and even TV-channels) add russian subtitles please)

Dear Battle Order - very much enjoyed your video , thank you .Minor suggestion on pronounsaiton the system is not called "musta" it is m'stA .Admitedly an awkward word even for russian speakers , it is an old slavic word for vengance and name of some river .

@38Kilo

2 жыл бұрын

Nice, I wonder what river... something in ww2 I would have to say

Thank you for the commentary.

Very well explained, you're my new YT channel bro 👏🏻

4:06 foreshadowing?

Do you have any plans for videos on rather "minor" nations like Poland, Hungary or Ukraine? I really enjoyed the video with Swedish army and personally would love to see video on the Polish army.

@PewPewPlasmagun

2 жыл бұрын

Tbh there is not much to talk about. The major powers have more stuff and tech.

@JoinMeInDeathBaby

2 жыл бұрын

+1

@stanisawnielepkowicz1881

2 жыл бұрын

@@PewPewPlasmagun well, videos on Japanese and Swedish armies have quite a lot of views. Also Battle Order doesn't make videos about military equipment and tech, I would like to see how smaller armies operate in general strategy, tactics etc. If anything the bigger nations are boring because of how many videos were made on them. For example Polish army has combination of western and eastern equipment and I'd like to see how it is used in combat.

@renegadeone9479

2 жыл бұрын

No videos on Indian armed forces till now.

@renegadeone9479

2 жыл бұрын

Surprised to see no videos on French as well. On level of Japan and Sweden, we can talk of Israel and Turkey as well.

1st time i see this channel. Pretty much realistic explanation (Deserve abo absolutely)

Amazing video!!!

Nice work! Can you do one on modern German armoured forces, by any chance?

Also bit of information for the video poster. The US no longer uses the copperhead round. We still have them in inventory and storage(cause we bought a lot but they're just sitting there) But they proved to be risky. At times they could not distinguish between which end of the laser guiding it was the observer or target. And we've nearly killed our own observers with it. So we no longer use laser guided rounds.

@BattleOrder

2 жыл бұрын

I am aware. I mentioned the Copperhead because that’s what the Krasnopol’s guidance is like

@mailman35419

2 жыл бұрын

@@BattleOrder my bad then. Carry on!

@aps125

2 жыл бұрын

US Army has a new anti armor 155mm terminal guided projectile called Bonus. Think it as a modern version of copperhead. You can check it out from BAE official KZread channel: kzread.info/dash/bejne/c6Sju9Fxc9Xambw.html

@hjorturerlend

2 жыл бұрын

@@aps125 Bonus was first adopted in 2000 by the Swedes and French, not exactly brand new. Bonus is an end-phase IR guided AT shell, it's not a laser-guided shell like Krasnopol or Copperhead.

@aps125

2 жыл бұрын

@@hjorturerlend Bonus MK2 entered US service just two years ago. The new variant has both IR and laser seekers to boost the kill rate. The sensor fused warhead contains two EPF submunitions to defeat AFV

Nice video esp the battalion Organization structure …very clear

Great presentation thank you

At this point in time shoigu and gerasimov still knew where the ammo was

Now we need artillery analysis of NATO countries. Great job!

@spencerstevens2175

Жыл бұрын

Just look at Ukraine vs Russia. Now imagine an actual NATO fighting force there. It wouldnt be pretty for Russia.

@apoleonschneider

Жыл бұрын

@@spencerstevens2175 it's said that nato doesn't have numbers anywhere near to what the Russians field. They compensate (or overcompensate) with air power.

@spencerstevens2175

Жыл бұрын

@@apoleonschneider its sad you still believe everything you read about the Russian military

Very informative as usal

amazing video!

@BattleOrder

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

Terrible day to have this recommended.

0:12 As an interesting sidenote, the old motto of Russian artillery was _Tuetur et terret_ - '[It] Preserves and Frightens'. 10:51 Harrasment fire is usually referred in Russian as беспокоящий огонь.

where can I learn these military designations, symbols and composition? Big fan, btw! Keep up these great videos

Since I first watched this video I started using a 2S3M Akatsiya in War Thunder. It's not easy, armour is not existent, but it is fun for sure. Especially with the 3OF25 HE shell.

So basically, with air superiority and heavy artillery, you get Donbass August 2022. An absolute meat grinder.

@peterdonlon2083

Жыл бұрын

More like lack of air superiority

@hello-ii5lh

Жыл бұрын

@@peterdonlon2083 source: ukraine

@mycure0498

Жыл бұрын

@@hello-ii5lh That didn’t age well.

@RazorsharpLT

Жыл бұрын

@@hello-ii5lh Aged like milk, vatnik Made a clown of yourself for all to see. Honk honk 🤡

@quik478

Жыл бұрын

It appears they DO have superiority in air now. Howeveer Russian involvement in pre-2022 Donbas was really one sided on artillery, you can see shit tone of pics with burned ukrainian columns.

I served in a German Panzerhaubitze 2000 and its safely to say that this Beast is right at his high Position in the SPA Ranking

@user_arbuser_01

2 жыл бұрын

Imho, it is the best self-propelled howitzer in the world on this moment. 👍

@Daurentius322

2 жыл бұрын

@@user_arbuser_01 Actually the best hardware is not the one which costs the most or which takes the longest to produce. The best hardware is the hardware which has an acceptable effectiveness but can be mass produced at such an exponential rate where for every piece your adversary assembles, you assemble 10. So yeah, Russian SPGs are not the best, but who cares if you have only 20 top notch SPGs having to face 200-400 more than okay SPGs? Hence why Russian hardware is so lethal, not because it is the best, but because of the amount the Russians possess.

@MegaBanne

9 ай бұрын

Doesn't get close to the Archer system lol.

@MegaBanne

9 ай бұрын

@@Daurentius322 That is such cope lol. That is why they are being destroyed in the hundreds by CAESAR and Archer systems as I am writing this comment. lol.

@klaush3351

7 ай бұрын

The germans make with the PZH 2000 the same mistake as with the Tiger tank in WW II: to complicated, to much repair intense and to build only in low numbers. What is the sense if one tiger can kill 5-10 T-34, but the russians had tens of thousands of them and the germans had maybe 2.500 tigers. The most of them not shot by T-34, but broke down by mechanical issues, lack of gasolin or enemies artillerie fire. Same problem today with PZH 2000 and many other western weapon systems. Take a look at the experiences with PZH 2000 in Ukraine. Then you know, where the issues are.

Great explanation thank you

Can you do a video explaining U.S. artillery units ( DIVARTY )? Really interested to see how they compare! Great work as always!

I love your knowledge of US' artillery pieces used to compare the Russians! As an Artilleryman..

When you don't have an all powerful airforce, you need artillery. The German army used to field a lot of artillery too. They had a ratio of 1 artillery battalion for each 2 regular (Tanks & Mechanized Infantry) battalions, during the Cold War. Of course that was one of the first things to go when they made that idiotic shift towards a "peace keeping and nation building" army in the 90s. It will be interesting to see whether they will go back to something more sensible and capable now that they announced that they would "re-arm".

what a detailed video!

Awesome video

4:05 Well, that one aged like milk...

Ahh yes this aged well

@bigbrother7405

Жыл бұрын

Well it did the Russians have given up on mobile BTGs and switched to mass artilleey firepower

@mycure0498

Жыл бұрын

@@bigbrother7405 Until it didn’t

@ducking_fonkey

10 ай бұрын

Ah yes, it aged well.

@maximilianodelrio

5 ай бұрын

Yeah, Russian artillery has battered Ukrainian units

I'm a new viewer and the sound effect at 8:33 sent my neurons firing.

I would lime to see a material about RF Rocket artillery force and counter battery strategies/tactics.

This is very interesting the use of UAVs or drones with artillery. Interesting the things are being used and we have live proof or their use in combat. Wonder if our own forces, have such advanced thinking and utility for such technology.

@Apophis544

2 жыл бұрын

Есть видео из Сирии, штурм Абу-Кемаль kzread.info/dash/bejne/oIydmY-sqtvViJc.html

@VT-mw2zb

2 жыл бұрын

In an environment where the battlespace is heavily defended by Integrated Air Defence systems of all types, ranges, and guidance, drones and artillery maybe the only systems that can survive being shot at.

If anyone has played Tom Clancy's EndWar this is pretty much how I conducted my battles, air strikes aswell with forward riflemen observer platoons.

Thanks for the HOI4 template ideas

Good stuff

In sniper duel on 2km distance and more wins artillery

Stalin is quoted as saying artillery is the God of war.

Battery Senior Officer can be not only Senior Lieutenant, but just Lieutenant. I'm not senior, yet I have been tought as BSO. (If you name it Senior Officer of Battery, abbreviation will be just like in russian)

Should include more footage of the interior,specifically the fcs display.

10:05 omg is that a baofeng

@alaric_3015

2 жыл бұрын

the Chinese has infiltrated them

This aged in... devastating manner :-( Good content though.

Wery good video. Immediate subscription.

Please do video about artillery for paratroopers I mean 2S9 Nona-S.

Ukrainians: "WRITE THAT DOWN PAVLOV WRITE THAT DOWN"

such a great video, thanks mate, and greetings form Russia.

Damn, I fell in love with your channel. Such a wonderful example of ruzzia apologists in the comments. Can't wait to read more in future videos, I hope you'd pick the same title and content for the next video. Popcorn is reserved for sure fella!

Nice

Modernised puma panzer grenadier divisions please

Looking forward to this, something about the german army next?

@BattleOrder

2 жыл бұрын

Got something on China scheduled next

@magnagermania9311

2 жыл бұрын

@@BattleOrder well, any of your content is much appreciated, high quality here. Thanks for your great vids!

@BattleOrder

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks!

@PewPewPlasmagun

2 жыл бұрын

German what now? Does not exist.

@magnagermania9311

2 жыл бұрын

@@shinchan-F-urmom what does that mean

Im no pro in military weaponry i just know the normal basics, but i wanna ask this cause im curious, is it possible to use modern howitzer and shoot another tank like acting as a main battle tank like heres a situation ( the enemy launch a surpise flanking attack cutting off the artillery division they are about to retreat but one howitzer got hit by an enemy artillery hitting the tracks and it cant move but the main gun is still operational the other howtizer retreated but their postion is strategically important bridge and luckly the spot they got hit is in the other side facing the bridge were the enemy is coming, their postion can be defended in choke point position the enemy got no main battle tank only light tanks like infantry vehicles and 6 infantry squad) is it possible to defend it with only a disabled tracks howtizer and lets say 4 squads to defend the bridge? Please dont hate me if its a dumb question, im just curious if its possible and i would really like to hear your opinions, thanks in advance

@chaosXP3RT

2 жыл бұрын

At a close distance, like in a town near bridge, a modern SPG could definitely do some damage and destroy tanks at such a close distance. However, at further distances, it would be unlikely that they would see enemy tanks. Modern SPG's do not carry anti-tank ammunition so they're shells would be jarring, but would not penetrate tank armor. Some SPG's also have huge gun barrels that are not suited for firing in small spaces like towns. In addition, they use large "feet" to brace themselves against the ground so they are not capable of firing on the move. Long story short, a SPG can knock out tanks at close ranges, but are ineffective at medium ranges. At long ranges (over the horizon), they can damage tanks, but artillery is meant to shower an area with high-explosives. They don't have the ammo for destroying tank armor.

@iplaygames8090

11 ай бұрын

Soviet doctrine spgs have direct fire capability. This was even mentioned in the video at 12:20

Fantastic 😁😁

@BattleOrder

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks!

*God is on the side with the best artillery.* *-Napoleon Bonaparte*

The maximum combat reach of the US artillery was 30 km with smart ammunition, maybe the"bad guys" are only out at that range, or they were unable to discover enemies at further range, but ayway, 30 km was the maximum US used combat range.

@chaosXP3RT

2 жыл бұрын

Was the maximum range? Or is?

@chaosXP3RT

2 жыл бұрын

What weapon systems are we talking about? The M777 or Paladin, or????

@jamesmerkel1932

2 жыл бұрын

The US ERCA sytem has a range of 70km...

@username_3715

Жыл бұрын

erca with ramjet is going to reach 130 km lol

Very intersting 🙂

I wonder how much damage the nuclear round does to abrams if it directly lands on it

If you feel being harassed in the office, think that in the field you can be harassed by 152 mm HE-FRAG shell.

@alexkrylewski3218

9 ай бұрын

Don't even need to imagine, lol. Also, 120mm mortar.