Griffon 6x6 Multirole Armored Vehicle French Belgian army technical review Scorpion CaMo program
Ғылым және технология
The Griffon VBMR (Multi-Role Armoured Vehicle) is a new development of 6x6 Multi-Role armored vehicle for the French Army under the program EBMR Scorpion (Engin Blindé Multi-Rôle - Armoured Multi-roles Vehicles). The vehicle was designed and developed by a consortium of French Companies including Nexter Systems, Renault Trucks Defense, and Thales. The Griffon will also be delivered to the Belgian Army, part of the CaMo (Capacité Motorisé - Motorizec Capacity). program. In this video, a technical review about the Griffon VBMR by the editorial team of Army Recognition, online defense and security magazine, a subdivision of Army Recognition Group based in Belgium.
Read more about the Griffon at this link www.armyrecognition.com/frenc...
Visit our online defense and security magazine and read more news at :
Army Recognition www.armyrecognition.com
Navy Recognition www.navyrecognition.com
Air Recognition www.airrecognition.com
World Army Pictures www.worldarmypictures.com
Defense Web TV www.defensewebtv.com
Army Recognition Group SPRL
Global Defence & Security News
Defense & Security News Web TV
Online magazine for defence and security industry
Marketing and advertising for Defense & Security Industry and Exhibition
Contact mail: marketing@armyrecognition.com
Пікірлер: 89
This looks like the perfect urban assault vehicle.
@krzysztofbosak7027
Жыл бұрын
Surely? It cannot survive any RPG for 1500USD.
nice mini gun on the top
Se quierem vender algum dia para o Brasil seria bom que eles fossem anfibios.Brasil tem muitos Rios e Muitos lagos.
@crewgerssw4976
2 жыл бұрын
the Griffon have good amphibious capability I believe
@LOLOVAL-os3pq
Жыл бұрын
amphibious vehicles often have slow speeds, around 6 km/h! beyond, there are many faster machines but the price is not the same, we see amphibious tracked machines, but these tracked machines have very low capacities on rocks (dried river beds) their tracks would be quickly damaged ! to cross the rivers, there are machines on wheels which deploy floats, by putting several of these machines, you can even make bridges! pure a lake, it goes faster to go around the lake than to cross it! CEFA = kzread.info/dash/bejne/eYKGmaqvnazRhbA.html
available for civilian???
@MrJihadkoplo
5 жыл бұрын
heavy is good, i need that to crushed another civilian
Im too a griffon 420 my self
what 's the point of electric doors ?
@jimbaneham5999
5 жыл бұрын
DarkMatter61 the armoured doors are very heavy. The vehicle is designed to go over rough terrain and the doors may have to be opened when the vehicle is at an angle. Without electric power opening it would be very difficult to open the doors.
@DarkMatter61
5 жыл бұрын
@@jimbaneham5999 Makes sense, thanks.
@kumbackquatsta
5 жыл бұрын
@@jimbaneham5999 can you manually override it? seems risky waiting for the door to open while under fire.
@Tagadarealty
5 жыл бұрын
@corpsserar manual small door.
@sittingduck4771
4 жыл бұрын
@@kumbackquatsta i was wondering the same thing.... just imagine. "We're under fire, get in Jaques!!" "Let me open the door real quick, hol on Didier"... *30 seconds later* "OK get in!"
👍😎☕
Good choice for our belgian army but we need an 8x8 APC to replace our Piranha’s
@northman9227
4 жыл бұрын
look the VBCI
@Rafa-mp6xe
3 жыл бұрын
@@northman9227 i don't think is good enough for the Belgian army..The Jaguars will be the one to replace our (wheeled tanks) DF90 so it would weaken our forces
@Ascaron1337
Жыл бұрын
Boxer.
50 liters per kilometer 800 range = 40,000 liters tank 🤣🤣 even for 15 that would be a 12,000 liters tank . 50 for 100 kilometer 400 liters tank OK....
Yep' Also Toilet Paper Recon Mission Possible Vehicle!😶👍
I didn't know that the Belgian army was now under French control, when did that happen.
@mintberrycrunch6657
4 жыл бұрын
Where is it said?
@gourmand1336
4 жыл бұрын
If you suggest that the air forces that have bought the F-35 are under US control you are right : all flight datas are gathered in the USA.
@thibaultd7979
4 жыл бұрын
it's not under french control, it's simply teamwork between the 2 armies in developing a good doctrine relating to APC's and how to best use them
@thibaultd7979
4 жыл бұрын
@@gourmand1336 it's not under US control, the belgian army is completely autonomous except for the navy which has a close coalition with the dutch navy, yes most flight data does come from american tests and tests by lockhead but belgium has also done tests itself, why would using flight data mean it's under the control of the US army????
@neage59
4 жыл бұрын
@@thibaultd7979 It didn't talk about tests but abour flight datas. Each time Belgian Air Force (and other customers) will use the F-35, the Americans will know where, for what, and how. It's spying.
تشبه المدرعه الايرانيه رعد
perfect against gilet jaune!
THE ROOF OF THESE VEHICLES WILL BE TOO HOT FOR A SOLIDER TO LAY DOWN ON AS WILL THE MACHINE GUN TO OPERATE!!! TERRIBLE DESIGN!!! :-(
@jojototo4566
3 жыл бұрын
Why would a soldier lay down on the roof ? These machine guns are tele operated
@breizhancien56300
3 жыл бұрын
the engines are excellent; not the equipment. and we're talking about a car. this is completely different
Très très très mal équipé👎👎👎
@Destru
Жыл бұрын
En quoi il est mal équipé ?
Lmao, they just copied the Turkish KIRPI
@neage59
4 жыл бұрын
They are not even similars, so it can't be a copy. Kirpi is a copy of the Israeli Navigator.
@ThePunisher014
3 жыл бұрын
@@neage59 I see, i apologize for my ignorance then, they just looked too similar
@Thomas-cu3he
3 жыл бұрын
They do not look the same. Plus, if they look just a little similar, it’s because they have the same role, armored personnel carrier.
@sucellus5452
2 жыл бұрын
nothing has to deal with.... griffon is nrbc protected, carry an anti tank missile launcher, optronic, electronic warfare,... in fact kirpi is just un troop carrier and certainly not an urban assault armored vehicle like griffon
I'm very concerned, it's a damn Renault motor... French quality = failure
@mintberrycrunch6657
4 жыл бұрын
ok STAN, have a look at your Germand gods' reliability records. They're the worst in the industry. French cars rank among the best.
@adrienjeunesse973
4 жыл бұрын
French quality = failure ? It's why Mercedes choose Renault's engines for some of their cars and BMW choose Peugeot. Go to Morocco or Iran and ask what are the best motors in hard conditions : Mercedes, Toyota, Renault and Peugeot !
@sittingduck4771
4 жыл бұрын
@@adrienjeunesse973 c'mon who are you fooling? With some exceptions like Volkswagen, Skoda or Seat all the French cars are generally amongst the worst rated brands concerning failure/breakdowns on roads (Belgium, Netherlands). All the Asian brands scores the best, followed by mostly German cars. The fact that Mercedes uses Renault engines with e.g Class B (ok, wich is the "best" French car) is simply a matter of economical choice. And btw, all brands can be exported for third world countries but, once again, the Asian brands are the most wanted and reliable for those countries as well, never a Citroën. Just stick with the baguettes and croissants.. wich are also better in Belgium as well actually.
@adrienjeunesse973
4 жыл бұрын
Belgium ? Yes, a country well known for their cars :-D
@methodeetrigueur1164
4 жыл бұрын
Sitting Duck Don’t think so : French VAB have Renault (Saviem at the beginning) engines. They are been used for 40 years. Reliability evidence !
Turkish fake kirpi
@FredAndCoInc
Жыл бұрын
C'est le contraire sauf que le produit turque n'est qu'un simple transport de troupe.
its ugly, lmfao :)) Turkey build better vehicles
@knackiechan4011
5 жыл бұрын
No, stay mad
@thepny_chasseur_de_tricera5361
4 жыл бұрын
No
@oghuzkhan5117
4 жыл бұрын
@@thepny_chasseur_de_tricera5361 yes
@hudson1714
4 жыл бұрын
Le gros problème avec vous les turc c’est que vous êtes arrogants et grandes gueules.. comme nous
@jeanvaljean4876
4 жыл бұрын
Which one?