Coach Greg is recording a video faster than last time, there is no way he will leave this unchallenged

@KeyserSoze23

6 ай бұрын

He will have a good rebuttal to this.

@deltalima6703

6 ай бұрын

Apology incoming? 🤓

@i000110001100

6 ай бұрын

"Maybe in Bart Kay's world you can break the laws of thermal dynamics: *Blublublublublu*"

@prgnify

6 ай бұрын

@@KeyserSoze23his come back is going to be to talk about Mitch's legs, which he didn't measure and are much leaner than the rest of his body, and massive at the same time.

@madzanta

6 ай бұрын

​@@deltalima6703Bioelectrical impedance analysis is as reliable as a Lada from CCCP.

8% maple syrup

I would say around 25% I did think Greg was too high but I think 20% is too low

There is no way he is 20%. 25% is probably more like it if I had to guess.

@pupper5580

6 ай бұрын

Coach Greg came up with a conspiracy theory that Mitch Hooper had been losing bodyfat for this reading. But even at the video where Mitch was estimated by Greg, I would have guessed his bodyfat is in the 25% range.

@JB00092

5 ай бұрын

If he is 20% i must be sub 10%😂

@jimjohnson530

5 ай бұрын

Again, its a percentage of a whole not a measurement of his total overall fat. Do any of you understand that? You think 1/3 of him is fat? You guys are silly.

@davorzdralo8000

Ай бұрын

​@@jimjohnson530wtf are you talking about?

For a strongman you are very lean compared to what we have seen in the past but I think you are between these 2 ranges. It would be interesting to see further examples like a dexa, submerged underwater or an MRI scan which I have heard is the most accurate.

@excat

6 ай бұрын

Issue with dexa scan is the big guys like him can't fit fully on most of the machines from what I understand. I would think water would be one of the most accurate ways from a simple physics standpoint then mri being overall most accurate. Me being the expert that I'm not, would guess 20-25% on Mitch, I think 30% is pretty high. His lower body is really lean for someone in strongman, not like olympia lean, but still, pretty dang lean.

@Cassp0nk

4 ай бұрын

Dexa isn’t even that accurate as based on a model. I’ve had inconsistent results between scans.

@pcbaddieacademy

4 ай бұрын

Dexa is not fucking accurate at all completely bs

@BasedCabbage

4 ай бұрын

My guess is 23 24%

Very cool to show this conference and some of the neat techniques being proposed for high performance. You deffinitely bring something new to strongman content with your degree and interests.

@mrpitts2017

6 ай бұрын

I agree completely. Mitch brings in a whole new level of data analysis and data driven technique. Not that other guys don’t do it, but they don’t give a breakdown and behind the scenes like Mitch

In fairness that's the least accurate method so now you've to use all the other methods culminating in that one where you breath out while underwater and you can tell Greg how accurate he is.

@uoiuo

6 ай бұрын

This would be more accurate than the skin test Greg did , this skin caliper didin't even see the skin on his legs .

@mcfarvo

6 ай бұрын

Hands-feet BIA is okay, but definitely not near the gold standard, especially n=1

@NicksGotBeef

6 ай бұрын

These thing are a joke. We had a top of the range Tanita at my gym and for some reason it always said I had a lower body fat than my pt who was close to stage ready at the time. I literally had inches around my waist.

@jimjohnson530

5 ай бұрын

Its not off by 10% Just look at Mitch. Hes not 1/3 fat. No, not ever just no.

@jimjohnson530

5 ай бұрын

They've never seemed to be far off to me. Maybe your forgetting other factors?

I did a test with one of these as well as a DEXA scan. This machine said 8 and the DEXA said 14… and I was tested on 3 different days with the same results.

@noahcoffman1227

6 ай бұрын

this is the worse possible test anyone can take.. any other method is closer to accurate.. dude would not be 10 percent fat at 288 thats a joke

@jimjohnson530

5 ай бұрын

Yet bros rely on skin fold which doesn't take much thought to understand how unreliable that is.

@eutiger4789

5 ай бұрын

@@jimjohnson530 It does take more than 10 iq cells for sure to understand that skin thickness will not screw the results and it seems to be very consistent measurements across all bodytypes

@KM-bu5yw

5 ай бұрын

@@eutiger4789 He is talking about visceral fat not skin thickness, obviously. You need to understand the basics before judging the validity of a test.

@eutiger4789

5 ай бұрын

@@KM-bu5yw this test is very much valid, when you dont take into account the 1% of people who will have a ton of visceral fat(not athletes, alcoholic usually)

I am Sure Mitch knows that this is the least accurate method of measuring BF% and that he is kind of joking. I think Mitch is around ~25% BF.

@MrLouisPoole

6 ай бұрын

Best not say that, you may well bruise his ego even more than Greg did.

@isaacwittinger8617

6 ай бұрын

I’ve always thought he is 20%, I’ll take this measurement over calipers any day.

@uoiuo

6 ай бұрын

The least accurate would be the skin caliper , Mitch has very lean legs and the skin caliper test doesn't account for that

@pdblouin

6 ай бұрын

@@uoiuo There is no single "skin caliper test". There are many models incorporating various pinch sites, some including leg measurements. I'm aware that Greg Doucette does not use these.

@noahcoffman1227

6 ай бұрын

dude he is so butthurt to act like this greg was closer to accurate than this terrible test. he is probably 26 percent these are almost always significantly off sometimes even off by 10 percent plus

Great chatting with you @ CSEP Mitch!

Years ago, in the fall of '82, I did a fitness assessment in the Queen's University Fitness Centre. Part of the test was underwater weighing to determine bodyfat. I was surprised to do so well: 16%. I expected 25% based on a waist/weight nomogram. The graduate student said that nomograms often reflect population averages which may be off for a particular individual. In my case, my excess weight goes mostly on and deep inside my abdomen; therefore, my bodyfat was overestimated. My obesity trend is truncal or apple, and the population average was more uniform allover like Humpty Dumpty.

no way your 20%

I tested one of these and got a 7% bf reading. I was just below 15% at that time actually so i´d say there is a small window of error on these

@noahcoffman1227

6 ай бұрын

exactly they are wrong bro it tested me at 7 percent and i was 13 percent

@drewlaventure9735

5 ай бұрын

Small window ?huge window 🪟

@jimjohnson530

5 ай бұрын

When you say you were “actually….” What is the precious golden standard you are comparing to?

@jimjohnson530

5 ай бұрын

Again, based on what second reading according to which method and what reason do you have to conclude that the later was the correct and the former incorrect?

@a.k2156

5 ай бұрын

@@jimjohnson530 Precious golden standars :D Well, i did also caliper and it showed 13% which is closer but visual assessment was around 15% 7% is crazy lean and that machine was waaaay off

"Greg, what he said" - she did that so well! Thanks, an intriguing variety of information here.

Man that 30% that Greg told has really been eating at you huh 😂

@johnfitzsimmons5690

6 ай бұрын

I took the Omron impedance handle test and it showed 30.8%. Ughh. It eats at you & makes you want to drown your sorrows with a pizza. I get the WSM's chafing.

@chrispyy99

6 ай бұрын

Does this comment make you feel superior? Good for you man. It's not like Greg told him to his face that doing a proper test will yield a proper result, and that he should get tested individually.

@ssk58607

6 ай бұрын

​@@chrispyy99issa joke chill

@Bigramt

6 ай бұрын

Because it was wrong I commented it was wrong and Greg commented saying I was wrong He's not 30% If he looked like that weighing 230lb, then yes he would be 30, as he would have less muscle to weight ratio

@bobbybobman3073

6 ай бұрын

Hot take, as someone who has had one of those electrical tests done, they aren't remotely accurate for me, they claim I'm 14-15% meanwhile I'll go shirtless and get called chubby by men and women who don't work out. I'm probably around 22-23% when I was 18 years old I took that test and it claimed 8.3%, I've never had visible abs, and I'm a pretty decently built guy. 5'10 ish, 180-190 lbs most the time, and trust me if I was 180 and 8.3% I'd be nearly ready for amature natural body building show... These tests are pretty iffy, that being said when Greg said 30% I said 25% why/ cause I've worked with a bunch of sleeper builds like Mitchell and they are always soooooooooo much stronger than you think, I refuse to think they are getting that level of power out of the same muscle cross sections as me.

You're the James Brown of Strongman - the hardest working man in show business. Thanks for your other vid about rest intervals too, broke through a months long plateau today in the ohp. Cheers!

That machine told me I was only 15% bf when I’m 💯 certain I’m over 20

@jimjohnson530

5 ай бұрын

Based on what?

Your points on squat form and hamstring activation seem to be the consensus for most, but what do you think about ex-strongman Derek Poundstone's preference for going lowbar with maximal hamstring and glute engagement. He cited his reasons being mostly due to quad tears when performing WSM levels of weight. All this info is on his page, in his last video of a squat and deadlift seminar. The method poundstone gave works well for me but my femurs are incredibly long so obviously a unique case.

Awesome content!

To be fair, Greg did say if he took your legs into account you'd be lower. 😂

Love this stuff 🖖🏻

suuuuuuuper epic video. also, how the eff am i not subscribed already?

I wouldn't trust that machine for anything. I'm an Elec. Eng. and this is the sort of stuff that just measures impedance at DC and a variety of lower frequencies and there's simply no way to convert those measures to a body fat with sufficiently low error (i.e. very high uncertainty inherent to the method). DEXA is the only proper measurement.

@deltalima6703

6 ай бұрын

Relies heavily on the last few digits of the clock reading no doubt.

@6thsense464

6 ай бұрын

Exactly. Not even DEXA is proper measurement.

I found my performance would start to drop if I get too lean. I just felt better overall if I carry a little fat from an athletic performance standpoint, felt like I had more sustained energy and better hormone regulation.

@geraldfisher6475

6 ай бұрын

sure but unless you are a strongman a little fat means 15%

@jimjohnson530

5 ай бұрын

Agreed. Look at the winners of physical 100. Several looked soft and pudgy and beat out the models and bodybuilders. Ive been shredded and veiny and I have been husky. I feel and perform better as a beef cake.

@ghosthero0806

4 ай бұрын

@@geraldfisher6475 this is very false. underneath 10% is considered to be a critical danger zone where hormone regulation is nonexistent and your body kicks into survival mode, beginning to consume your muscles to keep you alive. when talking about health, there aren't magical points where things suddenly shift drastically, they are scalar. meaning that if sub 10% is critical potentially life threatening, you need to have significantly higher than that to have healthy hormone regulation and actual energy storage. 15% is likely the lowest possible safe level for certain outlier individuals, and for the average person 20-30% is "healthy". under 20%, humans demonstrate higher death rates from cardiovascular disease, which in the past led to the false conclusion that carrying more fat meant you were at higher risk of heart disease due to survivorship bias. similar to how when the US military started using steel helmets, head injuries went way up, but that was because more people were surviving being shot in the head. medical practice has not kept up with modern medical science, as most people in the field got their degrees decades ago and their education has since been made largely irrelevant. so many people, even prominent people, in the field of medicine are operating on an outdated set of standards that were set before we knew that lead and asbestos were harmful to humans.

There is no possible way he is 20%. He has a huge amount of muscle and you can barely see it. He’s definitely upper 20s

@RogueCylon

6 ай бұрын

You seem to struggle with percentage versus lbs of fat.

@jimjohnson530

5 ай бұрын

@Rogue My faith in humanity is restored. Thank you. The entire comment section is folks not understanding total body fat vs percentage. 1/5 even 1/4 of him as fat is believable (but a stretch). 1/3 of his body being fat is not believable. He has tremendous muscle mass.

@RogueCylon

5 ай бұрын

@@jimjohnson530 massive dry muscle weight as well. When we understand muscle composition. Moose is certainly the new breed of strongman.

Love that kind of video ! Would love more sciency nerdy stuff :D I am a little doubtful of that %BF value but who knows haha

I think inbody is pretty inaccurate. However I do think based on my own personal inbody said 9.5 for me and Calipers were 13.5 so I think that difference is about the same as you experienced. Inbody is a reasonable gauge to see if your moving in the right direction in my opinion but not super accurate

Love the friendly callout.

Thanks for all the science geekiness. I love it.

How much did you pay her for the reading (20%) my chiropractor has one that he paid $40,000 for. It always 8 to 12% low.

Bioimpedence is known to be the least reliable body fat. There's no way he's 20%. Got to be around 25%

@jimjohnson530

5 ай бұрын

Because you said so

@yorkshirestodge

4 ай бұрын

@@jimjohnson530 yes I've used it several times. It sucks

My guess is 20% bf,and that that machine (electric impedance) is so inaccurrate as to be essentially worthless.

@deltalima6703

6 ай бұрын

(Machine got lucky, lol)

As a biomedical engineer it's really cool to see this type of content, especially from a top tier athlete I started watching as a fan of the sport. Pretty rare combination ! LHBK from France 🇨🇵

Most of you guys dont get that 20% body fat at 321 pounds guy is 65 pound fat thats a lot. My experience with in body is that it is quiet accurate maybe one or 2 percent to low but overall quiet good. With caliper method 9 spot measurement my bodyfat percentage is always lower than on the inbody

@pupper5580

6 ай бұрын

I'm guessing caliper method is designed for people of normal weight - people below 265 range. Similar to how BMI is also designed for normal, average people - but it doesn't work at all for people, for example, who are tall.

🧢 hell nah dude is 27-32%

I think there is something people miss when thinking about body fat for such big dudes. The intuition we have based on us normal people does not apply, because there guys have different proportions. The formula used by this machine (the electic current/impedence is just one input), as well as by the caliper method, is surely based on the average body proportions. My point ultimately is that such huge guys have lower body fat that what our intuition suggests.

@ghosthero0806

4 ай бұрын

i'm 5'11, 260lbs. years ago, when i was homeless and starving, i went to the doctor and got weighed at 185lbs. the doctor told me that was a healthy weight for me, so i lifted up my shirt and showed my very visible ribcage. down to skin and bones i still weighed the high end of average. i had lost 50lbs in three months due to starvation and dehydration. if that is what it took for my body to drop below 200lbs, then i don't see how conventional methods of measuring lean mass vs body fat would possibly work for people built like me.

@MrCmon113

Ай бұрын

The caliper is nonsense from the get go, because Greg only applied it to three parts of the body. I'd be way better if you applied it to more parts, in particular on the legs.

@davorzdralo8000

Ай бұрын

​@@ghosthero0806yeah, that sounds like complete nonsense. At that height/weight you didn't have visible ribcage unless you are literally a cartoon character.

We Got that machine in my gym. It doesn’t really work, it says I’m 11,xx in body fat. A scan would probably say a bit more. 54 year old male 195cm heigh 85 kg.

If Mitch is 20 % then I'm 12%, good news !

@pupper5580

6 ай бұрын

like the lady said, Mitch has highest lean body mass she has ever seen - so I don't think you two are comparable.

20% seems alot more legit. thats not how a 30% looks like

@SpammyMcDougal

3 ай бұрын

But this is also a big man, fat is gonna me distributed differently. But based on his face and midsection, he looks around higher 20’s or 30. Also the smaller person u are the more dramatic an increase of BMI will seem and impact. A 4’11 person at 200 is wayy different (in a bad way) than a 5’11 at 300.. even tho both are around 40 bmi.. its harder to move that weight at that size. So him being that big with a 30 bmi makes sense. Im currently training to build stength and im 235 at 5’10. But im not fat. I havent done a fancy test just the one at my physician and im around 40% bmi. Which is odd considering bench 225 for 3 reps. Im fit but i build a lot of muscle. That thst all impacts ur score is my secondary point stating he looks like a 30 %

@davorzdralo8000

Ай бұрын

Nonsense. I'm 20% and not even remotely as fat as Mitch is here. He is not under 25%, there's just no chance.

What was your SMM?

Bioelectrical impedance in particular the in body scanner is wildly inefficient compared to other methods

@a.k2156

6 ай бұрын

Yup, tried it once and it showed 7%bf. I was under 15%bf at that time actually

@fakename5015

6 ай бұрын

True though the handheld readers are even worse.

@adamstacharowski5231

6 ай бұрын

@@fakename5015 handheld ones are awful lol

@adamstacharowski5231

6 ай бұрын

@@a.k2156 the only way it would be remotely accurate is if you used the scan as a constant to track your own personal progress. And eliminate as many other variables as possible like taking the test at the same time of day with the same amount of water and same amount of food taken in each time. Other than that I wouldn’t use them for anything

@a.k2156

6 ай бұрын

@@adamstacharowski5231 Totally agreed. Only problem is that if you would drop from 15%bf to sub 10%bf. If the machine is reading 15% as 7% then it would show ur dead by the time you reach 10% :D Pretty useless peace of kit in most cases but you can use it as a scale

The InBody scan just does not work.

That end lady was quick with that, what he said Greg

Please do underwater body fat test. The gold standard Bio impedance is notoriously inaccurate

This was hilarious, great watch!

5% moustache

Eddie: *laughs in dehydration*

”Greg, what he said” 😂 awesome, keep up the great content.

Told ChatGPT about this. It said “That’s a great example highlighting the limitations of BIA. When it comes to highly muscular individuals like Mitch Hooper, BIA can significantly underestimate body fat percentage because it often struggles to differentiate between muscle mass and fat accurately.” It gave a lot more info on why it’s not an accurate body fat measurement for muscular individuals, but you get the gist. Doucette was on point with his measurements.

He'll be stepping on stage at a peeled 250 maybe... after a 48 week prep

5’8 180lbs 27% body fat. That’s what my drs chart says. I should be 135-155lbs per the chart. I was 240lbs. Trying like crazy to get below 20% body fat. It’s really hard.

@ANTERIORcs

6 ай бұрын

Keep grinding bro, I was in your shoes not long ago at like 31% bf. Now I'm sitting at roughly 15% and couldn't be happier! You won't regret it at the end.

@hardway1746

6 ай бұрын

@@ANTERIORcsthank you. It’s definitely not easy. If it was everyone would be shredded.

@ANTERIORcs

6 ай бұрын

@@hardway1746 Definitely not. Consistency is key. It's okay to fall off every now and then, just don't overdo it when you do.

@6thsense464

6 ай бұрын

Eat less, move more and you will go down.

@pupper5580

6 ай бұрын

Focus on natural testosterone, sleep, good nutrition. Don't deprive your body of nutrition, this will make you lose muscle mass. Best to eat normal amount of calories, eat nutritious food (clean food), and life a balanced lifestyle.

I guessed 24% and I think Gregs response will be that this style of measurement varies up to 8%. But no hes not 30

Judging from the experiences in the comments, man really used one of the least accurate options out here. Get an MRI instead

This is cool, novel content; thanks!

Bicep gains already showing, Mitch.

8:53 Yeah, that was me in 2017 or so before my hamstring tear. "Man, I really should do these good mornings with better technique" *pop* Good thing it wasn't too bad but still.

Callipers are more accurate my guy. This electric test thing once told me I was 4% and I was around 10 at the time.

Wow! It's amazing how useless these bodyfat percentage measuring devices are when there are soooo many people just in this comment section that know it just by looking at someone! 😏

@andrewdoucette8090

6 ай бұрын

This was meant as sarcasm clearly, but those bioimpedence are pretty garbage compared to the other available methods

@seanpittaway5341

6 ай бұрын

This machine machine is useless though, like it or not

God this was so cool to watch

I'd be happy with 20. i don't need striations. new goal. thx Mitch

Great video, love a bit of geekery!

I said 20-25%, and my actual guess was 21%.

RHIS WAS A TRAINING ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION ECH FAIR LOVED IT ALL 👏🏼 👍🏻. THANKS TO ALL THE FAIR'S FOLKS IN THIS EPISODE🙌🏽👏🏼🙌🏽👍🏽🙌🏽🤟🏽🙌🏽🙏🏼🙌🏽🌟🙌🏽♾️ AND THANK YOU SIR HOOPER FOR THIS GREAT AND INFORMATIVE EPISODE 🙌🏽🙏🏼🙌🏽🤟🏽🙌🏽👍🏽🙌🏽👏🏼🙌🏽🌟🙌🏽♾️

Que Gregg’s video on why this method of testing body fat percentage is inaccurate. 😜

Dexa Scan is definitely more accurate than either Callipers or Electrical Impedence. Would love to see you do a Dexa just to see how different,

I'd say it's in between Greg's guess and that machine, but I don't think it's 20. I'd say 24. Your upper body could be 26-30, but your legs are probably actually 18-20. Just my guess of course. I'm around 26% myself with way less muscle 🤣

@jimjohnson530

5 ай бұрын

Thats the part many miss. Its a percentage of a whole and while athletes like Mitch have way more fat than most, they also have a tremendous amount of lean muscle and total mass. Hes not achieving record lifts with fat.

@misterringer

4 ай бұрын

@@jimjohnson530 Yeah nobody doubts his athletic ability. But those "sand on this conductive plate and hold the handles" machines are not accurate. A rough estimate at best. I'm guessing Mitch knows that and just wanted a clickbait title. Can't blame him. youtube is full of morons and that's how you get views unfortunately.

i'd say 25% but as a strength athlete you need it but if you wanted to it would be easy to cut or work on hypertrophy and maingain for a year or two and go back to powerlifting, but lose a little bit of strength for a while

Mitch reminds me of GOATS of past Like Big Z Magnes Ver Magneson ! Don't look like particularly strong as some of the stereotypes but Strongest among them. Have great expectations from this Man.

No way are you 20% Bro! 😂

@jimjohnson530

5 ай бұрын

Theres no way he is 30% Thats for sure.

@Radders1433

5 ай бұрын

High 20’s at least.

I stepped on stage and earned an IFBB Pro Card at North Americans in late August and my scale read I was 20.6% BF with bioelectrical impedance. How is this possible?

@Cenot4ph

5 ай бұрын

all methods are inaccurate in some way, they're estimates.

This all went over my head

Olympia open division !

I trust Greg's laser eyes

The face at 15:14 it’s gonna be a meme soon 😅

Greg will react the shit out of this video 😄

Learned so much from the last lady.

That was funny! Greg, Greg, Greg...

If this dude is 20% then I’m -3%. For context I’m 25% on a Dexa and in decent shape. This guy has a lot of muscle mass but is at least 30% on Dexa.

@mitchellhooperstrongman

6 ай бұрын

So we are 17% different or 5% different? 🧐

@Max-cm2fo

6 ай бұрын

@@mitchellhooperstrongman electrical impedance will overestimate your lean body mass and underestimate your fat mass. Let’s get you on a Dexa table

love this guy, bro you earned 2 new subscribers

15:20 was the best. I laughed so hard.

I would say 25-30%, probably closer to 30.

Greg said that wasnt including the legs. He also said its probably about 22% like mitch said. Great chirp, id like to see the funny back and forth between these two

A grip one told me I was -3. I was honestly probably somewhere between 5 to 9% body fat. So those are just kind of a waste of time. I was 163 lbs at 6'0 tall. not exactly an achievement being that lean.

Don't know if the body fat is 30% but its defenitely not 20, I got down from around 27-28% to around 20% so I know, because at 27% I thought I am only 22-23 which was way off, the face doesn't look as big at 20% and especially with that ridicolous high muscle mass 20% looks quite lean! not shredded but impressive, for the average person that lifts 20% is somewhere at the middle, not lean but not actually fat, but for a mass monster you would expect to see much more definition even at 20%.

@jimjohnson530

5 ай бұрын

I dont think you understand how this all works. Its okay though most people dont.

@itaikaufman2986

5 ай бұрын

@@jimjohnson530 And you think you know better? So in your opinion he is at 20%? haha

Like a good teacher that Greg is he fudged the number in order to motivate the student ... or maybe not 😂

Based on your short pose down, I said "20%!". Damn, I still got it B)

@landonaron4103

4 ай бұрын

Yeah no it's wrong he's not 20 percent, that doesn't even make sense

i have seen greg videos. and everytime he comments on strength athletes fat percentage it seems way way to high... if he says this to provoke people or due to lack of knowledge i do not know.

Closer to 320 sticks of butter. A stick of butter has only 92g of fat. You have 29.5 Kg of fat. 29,500g / 92g/stick = 320.6 sticks

@mitchellhooperstrongman

6 ай бұрын

Ahh, thanks for the clarification 💪

@outlimboed

6 ай бұрын

Clarified butter@@mitchellhooperstrongman

How you know he was rigth when it was so much time between?

Can you talk about the steroids you have done. Going from marathon to WSM must be quite the stack

COOACH greg and I CANT believe what Michael Cooper just said

I would guess around 20% so

saying that Greg is full of shit was unnecessary

This method is very inaccurate and you are probably around 27-30%. When it comes to body fat % trust the pro bodybuilders because that is a huge part of their job.

I dont believe he is 20

Greg doesn’t believe that machine can actually test body fat

The thumb nail on the Gregg Doucette and Mitchell Hooper body fat percentage video encapsulates Greggs' dark twisted fantasy.

greg complaint incoming

Lol, guy said you don't strike me as an aerobic, long distance runner. If he said that to me it'd sting.

@deltalima6703

6 ай бұрын

Coming from a guy that doesnt even lift. Served him right when it blew up in his face, rest of the world knows mitch did marathons. Rofl.

"If you don't have abs you're fat!" -GShred.