[ This machine has not obtained a patent ] | The Story of Design | On a repeated tired morning, driving through a falsed culture of summer, I thought of how I could survive in the Arctic. If the sun doesn’t shine? If the turbines are iced? If heating fuels are spent? “I think”: That gearbox I found at the scrapyard recyclers. That metal box, why not hoist it up a flagpole track, link a dynamo, run some wires, and latch it on for an electrical descent! (What?). What sort of animal could hoist some greater weight for me? And so, Whether forgetting, or having never heard of ‘Gravity Electricity’, I became as original as the light bulb, that I, Mickskov, was not only the first to propose the idea of Gravity Electricity, though, that I would be the first also to invent the machine to translate Gravity to Power. Certain thoughts and feelings began to unset me. Greatness. Urgency, Foolishness, and certainty that someone else had must of certainly prototyped and tested such a device. Nonetheless, I avoided any mention of: Gravity Electricity, Mechanical Battery, Gravity Machine …etcetera… and so on to Google or KZread. The spark of invention, brilliance, and genius fastened my mind, and my internal notion that was very certain people had tested Gravitational Force to a machine, for the value of electricity that through some forms of lift and fall could be created.: remained submerged remained uncommunicated, with (good?) sense, and to a chance, competitors. You see, another voice spoke to my mind, it said: “Originality assembles in the world outside of reviews.” So that resolved it then. I was to build the whole machine, and have it work, outside of any research made on the subject. I further said, if indeed such a device had been made, this rudiment development, from my own mind and materials, will be such, a patent, fained(?) on a new course, will be owning to my creativity and building procedure without direction. :How I could feel the brooding of Edison. The careless certainty of Tesla. More-so finding my mind between the shoulders of Edison. Aware his presumed certainty of working prediction was a further shot than mine, as proven already to us all that magnets moving around copper spins create the spirit of electricity, and of course, knowing Edison was forming the unbelievable, … i still stood in company with his version of mind. :Hope. Hoping so to greater than chance. The furrowing expectation on brow that, ‘this indeed can work’, Set in my mind. After my day at work, sitting and pondering, at my unfinished invention, as he, having not yet found the working order, in rectangle frame, built upon the rolling chair. -Mickskov Corporation

I can Imagine something like this on a revolving wheel, using water.

@Inertia888

6 ай бұрын

Now imagine you are on top of a mountain, or in a dry plain, and need the same power. This would assist with wind and solar.

In Kinematic Physics its called "Potential Energy"

@-eternal

Жыл бұрын

Where I come from, my basement, this is called a gravity battery.

beautiful machine!

@mickskov3949

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks

This is 'potential energy' coverted back to 'kinetic energy' which was converted to 'electrical energy'.

Tem que sincronizar esse aparelho pra produção em continua escala

Very nice

Awesome

Der Regulator ( historische Wanduhr) meiner Urgrosseltern funktionierte nach dem gleichen Prinzip. Ein Gewicht lieferte die Kraft für den Betrieb des Uhrwerkes, welches 14 Tage die Zeit anzeigte. Heute werden die Uhren mit Elektroenergie angetrieben, welche in diesem Beitrag mittels Gewicht erzeugt wird. Aber es funktionierte vor über hundert Jahren bereits ohne den Umweg über eine Wandlung von mechanischer zu elektrischer Energie. 😋 Wurde der Ton zu diesem Beitrag mit der gewonnenen Energie erzeugt?

super

Сделай в 10 раз больше!

Hi, can you give me some stats; like, how much power is this model producing, what is the duration of the descent, what is the weight of the object descending. Good video

@jatwangismyname900

3 жыл бұрын

@@mickskov3949 okay. Thank you so much.

@ehombane

3 жыл бұрын

@@jatwangismyname900 You can do some math. I was curious too about how much energy you can get from dropping a height. Looked online for figures and computed how much kw could store a truck sized weight, 20 tones, at one km height. I forgot the figure but it was something like 7 kwh. So let see if I remembered correctly. We look here, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bath_County_Pumped_Storage_Station and see the volume, the height and declared storage capacity. So vol is 44 mil mc/34 mil the lower one. . height is about a third of a km. Storage declared is 24 mil kwh. I assume that is for the smaller one. Divided gives 0.7 kw per mc. So is more than 2kwh for a km height. If they used the upper volume for reference than is more than 1.5. So I assume that the second is right, because multiplied by 20, (my example) gives over 10 kwh. The difference comes from that 30 percent looses I think. Or my bad math. Now, this cuckoo has 400th of the weight and 1250 th of height. so will be like a mili watt there. Something seems off. For sure at this size losses are much higher, so less than a miliwatt to light the leds seems improbable. If I remember well one LED requires half a watt. But this is for full brightness, so yeah for flickering may be enough. My lamp has few led flickering when the power is off.

This is interesting! Have you ever thought about starting a business on this kind of tech?

Faltou inteligência para fazer o final

A nicely constructed machine. But isn't this just the calories you expended to physically elevate the weight being stored in the weight and then returned on demand via an inefficient machine and generator? I've got a 300-year-old clock that uses the same technology to keep time and it does it far more efficiently. I understand that you would use solar or wind-turbine energy to elevate the weight, but I'm not seeing any great revelation here. It's just a modified 300-year-old clock. Cheers.

@mickskov3949

2 жыл бұрын

Yes all true, this was just a ‘I wonder if I could make this work’ project. I can now sort of conceptualize a new machine that will be more efficient though. Learned how to fluently use the 3D printer software making the key and gears, took apart quite a few appliances, and sort of got me into using new tools so now it feels less overwhelming to take on more complicated crafts

@AdamGtr86

2 жыл бұрын

"I've got a 300-year-old clock that uses the same technology to keep time and it does it far more efficiently" Your 300 year old clock efficiently produces electricity?

@mareesteer7045

2 жыл бұрын

@@AdamGtr86, OMG - You've TOTALLY missed the point. My clock meets it's design brief of keeping time, and it does it FAR more efficiently than this machine meets its, which is to produce electricity.

@AdamGtr86

2 жыл бұрын

@@mareesteer7045 Your clock, via gears and potential energy, computes time. This via gears spins magnets *very quickly* to produce electricity. Just because my car uses gears in it, doesn't mean its comparable to a clock. You are comparing something outputing time vs outputting energy. No equivalence. You can say your clock is more efficient at telling time than this is at producing electricity, but they are different jobs completely.

@mareesteer7045

2 жыл бұрын

@@AdamGtr86, So when I wrote " I've got a 300-year-old clock that uses the same technology to keep time and it does it far more efficiently", you DIDN'T understand that to mean that using this technology "my clock is more efficient at telling time than this is at producing electricity"? *I find it amusing that others reading and liking my comment understood in essence that's what I meant - even the maker of the machine themselves.* Have a good day.

შენ საერთოდ არ იცნობ გრავიტაციას. რასაც ახლა აკეთებ მაგის წრეზე გადაყვანა შეიძლება .ჯაჭვის მაგივრად წვრილი, კანაფისაგან დაგრეხილი თოკი უნდა გამოიყენო.

Бессмысленный девайс

Эта ваша затея с гравитацией, тупик, это не решит проблему энергетики!! Не там ищете!!!!!