Going Nuclear with Neil deGrasse Tyson

Ғылым және технология

Neil deGrasse Tyson and Chuck Nice take a close look at nuclear power. How is it created and how do we harness it? You can learn even more at brilliant.org/StarTalk/.
Catch up with StarTalk Radio around the web:
Twitter - / startalkradio
Facebook - / startalk
Instagram - / startalkradio
If you love StarTalk, don't miss out on any news. Sign up for our free newsletter: www.startalkradio.net/newsletter
------
Hosts
Neil deGrasse Tyson, Chuck Nice
Director
Dave Wiskus
Science Editor:
Neil deGrasse Tyson
Writers:
Brilliant.org, Chuck Nice
Science Writing Team:
Aaron Miller, Blake Farrow, Danielle Scarano, Lee Weinstein, Josh Silverman
Animation Director
Bård Edlund
Animator
David Powell
Editor
Eric Schneider
Sound Designer
Jay Pellizzi
Music
Airplane Mode
Producers
Amanda McLoughlin, PJ Scott-Blankenship, Brilliant.org, Ben Ratner
Support us on Patreon: / startalkradio
Subscribe to StarTalk: kzread.info...
Follow StarTalk:
Twitter: / startalkradio
Facebook: / startalk
Instagram: / startalkradio
About StarTalk:
Science meets pop culture on StarTalk! Astrophysicist & Hayden Planetarium director Neil deGrasse Tyson, his comic co-hosts, guest celebrities & scientists discuss astronomy, physics, and everything else about life in the universe. Keep Looking Up!
#Nuclear #StarTalk #NeildeGrasseTyson
0:00 - Introduction
0:13 - Discovery Of Radioactivity
1:10 - Energy Of Mass
1:31 - Beginnings Of Quantum Physics
2:52 - The Chain-Reaction Of Nuclear Fission
4:25 - How Nuclear-Fission Is Controlled
5:14 - Thermonuclear Fusion
6:42 - The Science Of Supernovas
7:31 - Nuclear Energy & The Sun
9:18 - Sponsored By Brilliant
9:39 - Closing Notes

Пікірлер: 1 600

  • @Zygarde365
    @Zygarde3654 жыл бұрын

    people: NO NUKES! the sun: *laughs in nuclear reactor*

  • @Sync_Shard

    @Sync_Shard

    4 жыл бұрын

    I know this is a joke, but the sun is not a nuclear reactor. There is no uranium, thorium, or plutonium. The sun uses fusion to generate energy. If I remember correctly, nuclear reactors use fission. Fusion is atoms combining, fission is atoms splitting apart.

  • @weepingod

    @weepingod

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@Sync_Shard ikr he was so inaccurate he just simplified it to make it more palatable to the general masses

  • @marchorsting8059

    @marchorsting8059

    4 жыл бұрын

    It's a gravity and hydrogen fueled fusion reactor that never takes a break

  • @chaoticmasterpiece

    @chaoticmasterpiece

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@Sync_Shard Fission is the splitting of atoms, either by radioactive decay or by collisional impact. Certainly radioactive decay occurs because the sun contains many radioactive isotopes including thorium, uranium etc. Basically fission happens irrespective of any environmental constraints because it is an intrinsic property of radioactive nuclides. - image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry/ask/a11197.html

  • @Joel-ee4yh

    @Joel-ee4yh

    3 жыл бұрын

    @jocaguz18 commercialy viable fusion reactors aren't available yet tho

  • @physics_hacker
    @physics_hacker6 жыл бұрын

    Neutron: *goes up to bar and orders drink* How much? Bartender Proton: For you? No charge. Neutron: You sure? Bartender Proton: I'm positive.

  • @CarFreeSegnitz

    @CarFreeSegnitz

    6 жыл бұрын

    Bartender : we don't serve people who violate causality. A quantum physicist walks into a bar.

  • @Marleystrummer

    @Marleystrummer

    4 жыл бұрын

    😂😂😂

  • @ryuoh6928

    @ryuoh6928

    4 жыл бұрын

    Clap... Clap... Clap...

  • @ScottBoudreau1826

    @ScottBoudreau1826

    4 жыл бұрын

    This joke is in fallout

  • @johnathansirko3290

    @johnathansirko3290

    4 жыл бұрын

    Respect.

  • @Flippokid
    @Flippokid6 жыл бұрын

    This is the first time nuclear fission has been made clear to me.

  • @marvinmartinsYT

    @marvinmartinsYT

    6 жыл бұрын

    N7Mith That’s why I like this channel. Layman’s terms. Anyone can get a basic understanding from these video. Maybe not flat earthers lol. But most with a working brain can follow.

  • @lohne87

    @lohne87

    6 жыл бұрын

    That is just sad .. there is either something very wrong with your education system - or you have missed some years in middel school. Are you by any chance M'erican?

  • @Flippokid

    @Flippokid

    6 жыл бұрын

    No, Dutch. They basically taught the same thing but the visualization in this clip just suddenly clicked. I remembered most of the facts, 'that this and that happens', but now I understand how and why these things happen.

  • @electricfeel9501

    @electricfeel9501

    6 жыл бұрын

    he simplify it so the ordinary person can understand it. if you take a college Physics and Chemistry class it goes into depth and watching Neil Tyson won't help you pass the class....

  • @seandafny

    @seandafny

    6 жыл бұрын

    N7Mith im sorry

  • @mikekotouc6684
    @mikekotouc66843 жыл бұрын

    I love how pleased Neil is with himself when he tells one of his science dad jokes. The guy is a treasure.

  • @EDKsurly
    @EDKsurly6 жыл бұрын

    There needs to be more info like this. Too many people fear nuclear power without knowing why.

  • @Duncan_Idaho_Potato

    @Duncan_Idaho_Potato

    6 жыл бұрын

    Exactly. Nuclear power is safe. As long as you use your brain and learn from past mistakes, then you can build a safe nuclear power plant. If you look at the accidents that have happened in the past, there's always a HUMAN explanation for why the accident happened. The technology is sound, the humans using the technology are the ones who cause the accidents. That's something that can be fixed/prevented.

  • @dwarfie24

    @dwarfie24

    6 жыл бұрын

    Theres still the problem of waste though.

  • @Art_of_Syn

    @Art_of_Syn

    6 жыл бұрын

    The waste is much smaller than all other current sources in use, it is also highly recyclable, however there are laws preventing or road blocking recycling of waste. And when we get Fusion sustainable, the waste is even smaller which is also 90 some odd % recyclable, and that non recyclable portion that is left over (somewhere in the range of 1 cubic foot/year) is not highly active and 100% recyclable or reusable within 100 years. Also the "smoke" people always love to show pouring from the towers as if to say "see look at all this pollution.... blah blah blah" is 100% steam. In other words its safer, cleaner, produces waaayy more energy and makes f'n clouds!! =)

  • @uncleblunts5

    @uncleblunts5

    6 жыл бұрын

    EDK ReefMeister Nuclear power is nothing to fear. Watch Thunderfoot.

  • @rgaud8

    @rgaud8

    6 жыл бұрын

    Look up Bill Gates' new generation of nuclear power he's investing in. It's literally 100x more efficient with very little waste and no threat of meltdowns.

  • @RexRagerunner
    @RexRagerunner5 жыл бұрын

    *DAMN YOU IRON!! YOU BLEW IT UP!!*

  • @mr.ovenbox4941

    @mr.ovenbox4941

    5 жыл бұрын

    YOU DAMN DIRTY METAL!!!

  • @driedmangos8433

    @driedmangos8433

    5 жыл бұрын

    Mr.OvenBox LMFAO im dead 😂😭💀

  • @adityahegde4560

    @adityahegde4560

    5 жыл бұрын

    Lmaooo dude bad pun 😂😂😂

  • @ProdigyXI276

    @ProdigyXI276

    5 жыл бұрын

    proof that copper is the best metal

  • @mainemceachern1521

    @mainemceachern1521

    4 жыл бұрын

    DAMN YOU IRON ... YOU BLEW IT! Lol

  • @kirkgonzalez3163
    @kirkgonzalez31634 жыл бұрын

    As I keep watching Neil, I slowly tend to hate teachers who don’t teach like him.

  • @kesyj13

    @kesyj13

    3 жыл бұрын

    IYKYK!

  • @spidaxtreme

    @spidaxtreme

    3 жыл бұрын

    To be fair, they barely get paid.

  • @caesarwiroreno7441

    @caesarwiroreno7441

    3 жыл бұрын

    Please, do not hate the players. Hate the system. Its our educational system that fails us. Teachers is just a person who got told to teach, through set of curriculum. While what we needs is an educators, who intrigues our interest in things. And only then we can get teached

  • @samogufonianrockstar7510

    @samogufonianrockstar7510

    3 жыл бұрын

    I fell the same way and cudnt agree more with you!

  • @klaytonpeterson1596

    @klaytonpeterson1596

    Жыл бұрын

    Don't hate...become a teacher...and learn from teachers/mentors..like Neil

  • @IamKnucks
    @IamKnucks6 жыл бұрын

    I would make all StarTalk videos compulsory for science classes in schools.

  • @whereswa11y

    @whereswa11y

    6 жыл бұрын

    For flatearthers?

  • @HolaEspanyol

    @HolaEspanyol

    6 жыл бұрын

    wheresa11y natural selection will take the flat earthers eventually😂

  • @Ori_Ovadia

    @Ori_Ovadia

    6 жыл бұрын

    And religious classes aswell :)

  • @WouterCloetens

    @WouterCloetens

    6 жыл бұрын

    ... or, you can have actual science lessons in school, and learn the theory behind it (without the super dumbing down), learn about the operation of nuclear power plants, and then visit one on a school trip. Like I did in high school. It was awesome.

  • @marvinmartinsYT

    @marvinmartinsYT

    6 жыл бұрын

    IamKnucks Nail on the head there!

  • @BakedPhoria
    @BakedPhoria4 жыл бұрын

    I wish I knew about physics when I was younger...I am in so much love with physics!! Everything we have made is because of physics. Without it we wouldn't understand anything!

  • @3dgar7eandro

    @3dgar7eandro

    2 жыл бұрын

    You sir have discovered a hole new world of truth and illumination 🦾😁👌🏻👌🏻

  • @InfiniteCuriosity
    @InfiniteCuriosity6 жыл бұрын

    I love Neil

  • @saad1653

    @saad1653

    6 жыл бұрын

    Don't we all?

  • @boriserjavec6470

    @boriserjavec6470

    6 жыл бұрын

    Are you gay?

  • @stoniecad7805

    @stoniecad7805

    6 жыл бұрын

    Boris Erjavec I am and I want that sweet ass. Got a problem with that?

  • @JonB55198

    @JonB55198

    6 жыл бұрын

    yeah but his sidekick is annoying. I realized he's meant to play the role of a chuckle head. But, it gets in the way sometimes and seems a little affected.

  • @johnking1200

    @johnking1200

    6 жыл бұрын

    i agree! he interupts way too much

  • @TommoCarroll
    @TommoCarroll6 жыл бұрын

    That was a great graphic used to explain the processes in stars! Beautifully done!

  • @adolfodef

    @adolfodef

    6 жыл бұрын

    It is even more amazing that you may think: That last bit with the iron "pumping" the core was done in realtime [a supernova requires a few seconds to happen].

  • @TommoCarroll

    @TommoCarroll

    6 жыл бұрын

    You're right, that is even more interesting! As we explain in our update video (which you can check out if you haven't :P ) we've got a background in biology, so physics is something we actively learn about on a daily basis, and supernovae are up there with one of the most intriguing topics right now, so thanks for the extra info!!! :)

  • @JoeDeglman

    @JoeDeglman

    6 жыл бұрын

    The SAFIRE project is studying how a star works. We will soon create power the way the Sun does and leave nuclear power behind us. We already have fusion-powered aircraft and have proven the proton- proton chain doesn't work. Plasma power like the SAFIRE project is the way it works.

  • @GingerBeard31
    @GingerBeard316 жыл бұрын

    You two make learning funny and enjoyable! Keep up the wonderful work!

  • @jasp9661
    @jasp96616 жыл бұрын

    We learned this at school but Neil always manages to teach me something new *Cough School system Cough*

  • @GeneralPet

    @GeneralPet

    6 жыл бұрын

    school makes civilians. Universities make scientists :) Although schools are also bad at that. lol

  • @jasp9661

    @jasp9661

    6 жыл бұрын

    Madara Uchiha well idk what school you went to but you can't assume anything like that without context

  • @rurirotaru516

    @rurirotaru516

    6 жыл бұрын

    Sir Deldo anyone who ever went to any public school in the United states knows from personal experience. The kids didn't want to be their slacked off made fun of teachers. It was normally cooler to not learn to skip school do all the things to go against the establishment. So when the school does all ot legally can to teach a person and that person does all they can to nor learn then it's that persons own stupidity that they are dumb. When those paying for the school see that students don't want to learn grades going down and nothing is changing it those schools become just daycare and hangouts as Noone wants to put money where there is no turn around. so they stop plugging in money. And I could drag this out for parents society entertainment and personal responsibility. But I might as well just write a book at that point. So people being stupid is their own fault in the end cause of their own choices. Any argument against that neglects to take into account when from these low income and poverty stricken areas and schools some people still succeed. and now with all knowledge at our finger tips. If you are a stupid person it's your own fault.

  • @jasp9661

    @jasp9661

    6 жыл бұрын

    ok you have a good point there but I'm in the UK.I do listen and do the work (our school has little rebellious students )And our teachers are pretty cool.Doesn't mean I'm stupid for not knowing things I haven't been taught

  • @willofdodge1

    @willofdodge1

    5 жыл бұрын

    Being force to learn and wanting to learn can yield different outcomes

  • @grumpyjoe3298
    @grumpyjoe32986 жыл бұрын

    Wow that was genuinely an amazing lesson! Love it! Thank you StarTalk

  • @JordanMillsTracks
    @JordanMillsTracks6 жыл бұрын

    I love startalk so much, also I'm really liking that you have an animator to explain things more clearly now!

  • @pischur
    @pischur6 жыл бұрын

    I love to see you guys picked up on Brilliant! I have been using the free version for some time now (great content!), but the promo swaid me into going premium. Thanks for facilitating the learning! Cheerio, Pieter

  • @AdamDeBeers
    @AdamDeBeers6 жыл бұрын

    Great video guys, good work as always. What about episode about molten salt reactor?

  • @granadakimj
    @granadakimj6 жыл бұрын

    So... A neutron has a Multi-pas...?

  • @johnthaxton9235

    @johnthaxton9235

    6 жыл бұрын

    Captain_Crash_DK Nice reference.

  • @Duncan_Idaho_Potato

    @Duncan_Idaho_Potato

    6 жыл бұрын

    Leeloo Dallas Multi-pass. Mull. Tee. Passsss....

  • @OhKaeThen

    @OhKaeThen

    6 жыл бұрын

    Kor-bin Dal-las multi-pass

  • @Fordi

    @Fordi

    6 жыл бұрын

    Noo-tron!

  • @csgstormer

    @csgstormer

    5 жыл бұрын

    Multi-pass 🙏😘💥

  • @RTH1992
    @RTH19926 жыл бұрын

    Damn i really love these videos. So fun to watch and informative aswell. Keep up the good work

  • @haythamprg7343
    @haythamprg7343 Жыл бұрын

    So much information and interteiment here.. Love you guys!

  • @limabravo6065
    @limabravo60652 жыл бұрын

    I had a conversation with my brother in law over nuclear weapons, where he was under the impression that they are horribly complex and couldn’t be built by anything be other than super geniuses like those at los alomos labs. So I told him that the first weapons were built back in the 40’s with no computers, and no way to know if their designs would work. They also managed to pull off nuclear fission with nuclear fuel that they had to make. The bomb that blew up Hiroshima is about as simple as you can get, take two pieces of uranium 235 and combine them them violently and boom. He was still skeptical until I went on Wikipedia and showed him the design.

  • @rogerdodger5886
    @rogerdodger58866 жыл бұрын

    I love their chemistry . Great way to share knowledge

  • @TommoCarroll

    @TommoCarroll

    6 жыл бұрын

    It really is isn't it? It's like those language-learning apps that have you learning with one of the hosts - kind of calms your nerves about not understanding things straight away by knowing other people go through the same learning curves!

  • @terryk1233youtube

    @terryk1233youtube

    3 жыл бұрын

    Chuck nice has an awkwardness about him that i love

  • @partytor11
    @partytor116 жыл бұрын

    What I love about the host is that he's entertaining enough to keep you hooked, knows enough about the subject to not look stupid but still asks the relevant questions that the most novice viewers can learn from! Brilliant work! It's easy to let the guest (Niel Degrasse) do all the work by having the host be unknowledgeable but thankfully you guys don't fall into that trap!

  • @JustinPerea
    @JustinPerea6 жыл бұрын

    These have been great videos. Love the animations and art style.

  • @TypeErrorDev
    @TypeErrorDev2 жыл бұрын

    I learn something new every time I watch these two...freaking love it!

  • @37parman
    @37parman6 жыл бұрын

    Beautiful “mind”...beautiful “voice”....LOVE Neil

  • @luisfelipehernandez7920
    @luisfelipehernandez79205 жыл бұрын

    Loving this new format! Looking great with the animations.

  • @RocksmithPdl
    @RocksmithPdl6 жыл бұрын

    these are so much better than the stale podcasts. Keep doing them and add a bit of casualness to it too :)

  • @wangchong94
    @wangchong946 жыл бұрын

    love these two, funny and very interesting

  • @neinist
    @neinist6 жыл бұрын

    Thank you A levels for teaching me this so I can understand what they are saying. This is really interesting to me.

  • @thevitruvianman9781

    @thevitruvianman9781

    6 жыл бұрын

    Aaryan Ali Oh yes yes As Physics you're right! Radioactive delay haha

  • @Adam-mb1jn

    @Adam-mb1jn

    6 жыл бұрын

    I'm in year 10 and understand it??

  • @neinist

    @neinist

    6 жыл бұрын

    Adam what I meant to imply is that I'm grateful school is teaching me this subject as I have a passion for it.

  • @thevitruvianman9781

    @thevitruvianman9781

    6 жыл бұрын

    Aaryan Ali I get you.

  • @ASLUHLUHCE

    @ASLUHLUHCE

    6 жыл бұрын

    The physics we learned at the end of year 11 (fission, stars) was the only interesting part of the entire course

  • @ANURAG-pb8ve
    @ANURAG-pb8ve4 жыл бұрын

    This is what I liked about this channel, they focus on really good concepts without messing it too much. Good work sir, keep growing and reach 1million subscribers👍👍🙏

  • @spacetimedilation2740
    @spacetimedilation27404 жыл бұрын

    Hey guys thanks for all the shows.

  • @CL_Audio_Tuning
    @CL_Audio_Tuning6 жыл бұрын

    Would love to know what Neil's opinion is on Thorium reactors.

  • @carlosbornes
    @carlosbornes6 жыл бұрын

    I was expecting to hear your opinion about Nuclear Energy. Like if it is or not the more capable way of reaching a zero emission in a near future. Also talking about the 4th generation of reactors with Thorium. I guess you can make another video on that.

  • @Fordi

    @Fordi

    6 жыл бұрын

    I was hoping for this, too. Though, for a rehash of how nuclear power works, it was a good vid.

  • @sidewaysfcs0718

    @sidewaysfcs0718

    5 жыл бұрын

    "Thorium reactors" are a myth, they would never work.

  • @0ooTheMAXXoo0

    @0ooTheMAXXoo0

    5 жыл бұрын

    Nuclear plants do not get talked about much because they cost so much to build compared to any other way of making electricity. They also cannot ramp up or down quickly so you still need something like a battery to balance the grid so why not use renewables instead?

  • @uwunora
    @uwunora6 жыл бұрын

    You’re all really awesome, I keep learning and you make it fun, interesting and doesn’t take away my curiosity like school Keep up the good stuff

  • @manishadwani386
    @manishadwani3866 жыл бұрын

    Please upload new episodes frequently 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 this was amazing

  • @adambomb42x
    @adambomb42x6 жыл бұрын

    Mr. Tyson, I'd love to hear your take on the molten salt thorium reactor design.

  • @0ooTheMAXXoo0

    @0ooTheMAXXoo0

    5 жыл бұрын

    If you know anything about them then you know that we do not have materials that can handle the corrosion of the molten salt. What else is there to say until that materials problem has been solved?

  • @MyAidanRox

    @MyAidanRox

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@0ooTheMAXXoo0 untrue, these reactors are being used today just not as widespread. Most likely corporate interests peddling the corrosion fear and other embellished misinformation in the name of profiteering... Or maybe in the last year new advances made it to market.

  • @UrslurStarSky7
    @UrslurStarSky76 жыл бұрын

    This is my new favourite KZread channel.

  • @TommoCarroll

    @TommoCarroll

    6 жыл бұрын

    It's great! It's nice to see him talking about things he's passionate about in a really simple and relaxed environment instead of in front of a massive crew for a scripted tv show (not that we're complaining about those though!)!

  • @shivisiva3074
    @shivisiva30746 жыл бұрын

    Im really hooked to this channel . pls keep it coming

  • @niknackles8641
    @niknackles86416 жыл бұрын

    I love hearing neal talk science. It's honestly so calm and relaxing.

  • @shaggycan
    @shaggycan6 жыл бұрын

    There are actually newer designs of fission plants that are far more efficient than the ones currently in use, and produce MUCH less waste. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_IV_reactor

  • @0ooTheMAXXoo0

    @0ooTheMAXXoo0

    5 жыл бұрын

    Still far more expensive than any other forms of electrical generation.

  • @nickromo8195

    @nickromo8195

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@0ooTheMAXXoo0 see that shouldn't matter.. We're choosing money over our planet..

  • @Monochromicornicopia
    @Monochromicornicopia6 жыл бұрын

    Iron can and is fused in the largest stars, however it doesn't occur for very long because fusing iron does require more energy than is released during fusion (net energy loss), causing the star to lose its battle with gravity. When gravity wins, the stellar material free-falls toward the denser core, rebounding off it in a tremendous explosion called a supernova.

  • @AstroGremlinAmerican

    @AstroGremlinAmerican

    6 жыл бұрын

    Correct. Fusing iron takes more energy than it releases. Of course even more iron and other heavy elements, including gold and uranium, get formed during a supernova.

  • @Monochromicornicopia

    @Monochromicornicopia

    6 жыл бұрын

    Many high mass stars can create heavier elements than iron before they go supernova by beta -capture- decay, its pretty interesting.

  • @AstroGremlinAmerican

    @AstroGremlinAmerican

    6 жыл бұрын

    Beta capture? Beta particle is an electron. Can make an neutron but that only makes an isotope. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_capture

  • @badbeardbill9956

    @badbeardbill9956

    5 жыл бұрын

    You mean beta decay? Or how about the high energy of the supernova fusing heavier elements than iron, but losing energy in the process.

  • @Monochromicornicopia

    @Monochromicornicopia

    5 жыл бұрын

    @Bad Beard Bill You're right, I meant beta decay. And yes, supernova are responsible for the existence of most radioactive elements.

  • @johnyepthomi892
    @johnyepthomi8923 жыл бұрын

    I love the intro soundtrack too.. very uplifting!!!

  • @aceofacez10
    @aceofacez106 жыл бұрын

    I love these videos with the added visual elements.

  • @willfs88
    @willfs886 жыл бұрын

    I hope this question reaches you. Where does the warm go when the space station receives sunlight if there is no atmosphere to exchange thermal energy?

  • @flashpointwhite

    @flashpointwhite

    6 жыл бұрын

    I like this question

  • @Cat-ct9hn

    @Cat-ct9hn

    6 жыл бұрын

    Willian Fernando The ISS is very well isolated to maintain a normal temperature. Excess heat is radiated by the EATCS (External Active Thermal Control System) using ammonia flowing through pipes, with radiators around them.

  • @duomis123

    @duomis123

    6 жыл бұрын

    Energy can be released and recieved in multiple ways, light is one of them. That is what's happening. If that was not the case the sun would not be able to transfer heat to the earth.

  • @duomis123

    @duomis123

    6 жыл бұрын

    Adding to that, space stations are ussually extremely isolated from the surrounding enviroment, meaning that most of the light hitting the station is bouncing off of it (excluding that recieved by the solar panels). Otherwise it would be extremely difficult to control the temperature inside the station.

  • @Cat-ct9hn

    @Cat-ct9hn

    6 жыл бұрын

    duomis123 Exactly. Any object with a temperature releases infrared radiation.

  • @gordonmcdowell
    @gordonmcdowell6 жыл бұрын

    Fukushima wasn't really uncontrolled fission, you'd have to bring "decay heat management" into discussion to fully explain that accident. Fission had halted long before the meltdown. I'd hope Neil would discuss alternate coolant options on his show some time, including the notion that the fuel itself need not be in solid form: That would be a "Molten Salt Reactor".

  • @TheFarmanimalfriend

    @TheFarmanimalfriend

    6 жыл бұрын

    Don't be an idiot. Fission is why Fukushima happened. Because of the tsunami, it became uncontrolled fission because they lost the ability to cool the reaction, but it was still fission. You should take some physics courses.

  • @gordonmcdowell

    @gordonmcdowell

    6 жыл бұрын

    TheFarmanimalfriend “Decay Heat” is NOT a synonym for “Fission”. Fission had stopped long before the coolant flow stopped.

  • @Fordi

    @Fordi

    6 жыл бұрын

    All of the Fukushima reactors were offline (that is, not fissioning) by the time the tsunami hit, but they still had a lot of decay products (the things left after fission happens) left. Decay products are highly radioactive, and usually after the control rods are inserted (stopping fission), it takes up to 72 hours for the decay heat to fall to levels where the heat can be passively removed. The flood shut down the active decay heat removal systems. Without decay heat removal, the temperature within the core of reactor 1 rose, until it was hot enough that the fuel cladding started to react with the coolant water, releasing hydrogen. Meanwhile, pressure was high enough, due to the high temperatures, that hydrogen could diffuse through the metal walls. Eventually, when the hydrogen was sufficiently mixed in with the outer air, it exploded, blowing off the skin of the building going out, and damaging secondary containment going in. Similar situations occurred in reactors 2 and 3, on slightly longer timelines, since they were newer and had slightly better passive heat removal. Reactor 4 had been defueled for maintenance, and didn't go up. Reactors 5 and 6 had sufficient passive heat removal that they just about avoided explosions (though, they did suffer internal pressure damage). In short, gordon is correct. They did not blow because of fission; theirs were not "nuclear" explosions.

  • @davidwalters9462

    @davidwalters9462

    6 жыл бұрын

    Bryan, well stated. That's is exactly right. Some anti-nuclear people purvey the lie of fission occurring, which it didn't. The meltdown happened because the fuel to the emergency diesel generators was wiped out (stupidly the put the fuel tanks for the diesel fuel at the intake structure because it was...*cheaper*). At any rate the tsunami is what really caused the meltdowns to occur. Also, it is worth pointing out that no one has died because of this happening. World wide the nuclear operators went through a paradigm shift in safety, establishing auxiliary pumps, station-black out scenarios, hardening intake structures and so on. Nuclear energy has killed few people than any other source of energy EVER. Something to think about when people start screaming at the moon. I feel sorry for the farmanimalfriend who purveyed this nonsense and actually doesn't know what occurred at Fukushima's reactors.

  • @sabotsabotskij7047

    @sabotsabotskij7047

    6 жыл бұрын

    Agreed. If you're going to oppose nuclear energy - at least do with reasons based on facts regarding nuclear power plants. Newer reactor designs are far safer and resistant to meltdowns caused by natural disasters such as the one at Fukushima. The only unavoidable problem with fission reactors is the highly dangerous waste product that is expensive to store safely. It's still safer than fossil fuels right now, and it's cheaper than going full renewable. The only scenario where it's not a win-win to utilize fission energy is if commercial fusion energy were actually a viable option in the forseeable future.

  • @drewchill
    @drewchill6 жыл бұрын

    Keep looking up ^-^ love this show!

  • @edwardantwi5462
    @edwardantwi54624 жыл бұрын

    Glad i subcribed ... you make science, Physics really fun.

  • @Jamus1975
    @Jamus19754 жыл бұрын

    I feel smarter thanks to Neil. I know I'm not but he makes me feel it. Love Neil.

  • @GoldSrc_
    @GoldSrc_6 жыл бұрын

    *DAMN YOU IRON!* That made me laugh more than it should :D

  • @SlothfulTom
    @SlothfulTom6 жыл бұрын

    best explanation of nuclear fission/fusion i ever heard. good video, keep going.

  • @718Insomniac
    @718Insomniac6 жыл бұрын

    These guys are great together. Great video, I'm sharing.

  • @pegasBaO23
    @pegasBaO236 жыл бұрын

    If fussion past iron consumes so much energy it collapses the star, how do heavier elements get created in decent abundance Edit: Bad english correction

  • @Duncan_Idaho_Potato

    @Duncan_Idaho_Potato

    6 жыл бұрын

    That's a GREAT question, you're clearly a thinker. All elements heavier than iron are ONLY formed during a supernova. That is the TITANIC explosion that occurs at the end of a massive star's life. We know that the sun and the solar system formed out of the gas cloud created by an ancient supernova because of the presence of heavy elements here on Earth and elsewhere in the solar system.

  • @pegasBaO23

    @pegasBaO23

    6 жыл бұрын

    ProgHead777 I imagined that'd be cause, but I wasn't sure, I also imagine elements heavier than Iron, but with atomic mass close to it, also get made and contribute to the collapse of the star

  • @timframe570

    @timframe570

    6 жыл бұрын

    pegasBaO23 PBS space time has great material on this process. Also another way heavier elements are formed is through neutron star mergers. LIGO detected the first of this kind of merger several months ago via gravitational waves.

  • @trulyinfamous
    @trulyinfamous6 жыл бұрын

    Surprisingly, nuclear power could be one of our safest non-renewable sources of energy, given we are cautious about it. As with all non-renewable sources of energy, we must learn to use them correctly and safely in order to minimize destruction, but those energy sources will always cause harm to the environment, one way or another.

  • @trivialgravitas9188

    @trivialgravitas9188

    6 жыл бұрын

    Nuclear actually (despite a couple colossal fuckups) has a safer track record than Solar and Hydroelectric (which has had even more colossal fuckups, and a lot of minor ones, but you've never heard of them). Beating wind for human safety would be really hard though, and it's not clear whether Wind or Nuclear is safer.

  • @Fordi

    @Fordi

    6 жыл бұрын

    To add: while non-renewable, nuclear has a lot of options for enhanced sustainability. Reprocessing (fuel recycling, at about 80-90% efficiency) is one. Another is seawater extraction, which, once economic to do, increases the total fuel available to us by a factor of millions.

  • @pseudotasuki

    @pseudotasuki

    6 жыл бұрын

    Not to mention the abundance of fertile (as opposed to fissile) nuclear fuels. We've been using uranium because it's the best fuel to use when starting a nuclear energy program from scratch, but most of the technology required to burn thorium is nearly ready for commercialization.

  • @ericlanglois9194

    @ericlanglois9194

    6 жыл бұрын

    Trivial Gravitas, Wind might not be dangerous to humans but it's almost as dangerous as fossil fuel based energy when it comes to wildlife. Lots of birds are killed by wind turbines and unfortunately there's no way to stop it from happening.

  • @amag140696

    @amag140696

    5 жыл бұрын

    Eric, that's utterly false. Wind-energy-related bird deaths are a miniscule amount compared to the impacts pollution and human development (not to mention cats) have on bird populations. We're talking millions of bird deaths just from cats alone compared to wind energy which takes some thousands. Then considering the widespread and undeniable impacts fossil fuel has on the Earth's greater ecology and you're comparison is laughable.

  • @blaynewayne
    @blaynewayne5 жыл бұрын

    My favorite KZread channel Love the talk!

  • @komranbehbehani6379
    @komranbehbehani63793 жыл бұрын

    I appreciate the other guys just as much or more for asking questions that he might already know for us to understand! Thanks you guys big fan, check more like an AC unit of you guys!

  • @brendarua01
    @brendarua016 жыл бұрын

    Geek analysis. Gotta love it. I'm glad they hand fun with this hehee

  • @The3rdPlateau
    @The3rdPlateau6 жыл бұрын

    Please do an episode about liquid fluoride thorium reactors! Not all nuclear reactors can melt down, some are far more passively-stable. There are tons of advantages to LFTR vs. the traditional pressurized water reactor. LFTR operates at atmospheric pressure instead of 2300 PSI, doesn't use water as coolant, and can't melt down because the fuel is already dissolved in a liquid!

  • @0ooTheMAXXoo0

    @0ooTheMAXXoo0

    5 жыл бұрын

    They do not work yet is why they do not get talked about much.

  • @kimopuuwai9281

    @kimopuuwai9281

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@0ooTheMAXXoo0 except that they did.

  • @ibrahimjaleel5900
    @ibrahimjaleel59002 жыл бұрын

    The answer for my life long question. Excellent. Thank you

  • @stochastic_dreams
    @stochastic_dreams3 жыл бұрын

    Wow! That is the best explanation I've ever heard on fusion!

  • @devineandconquer9508
    @devineandconquer95086 жыл бұрын

    whoa i just learned so much from this, just a lot of "ohhhhhhh that's how it happened"

  • @HOLLYWOODUNAPOLOGETIC
    @HOLLYWOODUNAPOLOGETIC5 жыл бұрын

    "Damn you, iron!"

  • @klaytonpeterson1596
    @klaytonpeterson1596 Жыл бұрын

    Excellent....well done...informative and helpful...Thank you, Neil...

  • @aseelkasab9196
    @aseelkasab91963 жыл бұрын

    Yo, Neil, we need more of these videos pls Regards,

  • @fyutffdtuibgfetu
    @fyutffdtuibgfetu6 жыл бұрын

    Neil deGrasse Tyson 2020

  • @ianprado1488

    @ianprado1488

    6 жыл бұрын

    John Smith absolutely

  • @jasonalvarado3246

    @jasonalvarado3246

    5 жыл бұрын

    No, Ben Shapiro is running 2020, Neil can have the next one after that. Ben Shapiro called dibs first.

  • @TheAngryIntellect-

    @TheAngryIntellect-

    4 жыл бұрын

    You don't want someone smart to run the country, you want someone that scares the shit out of all other countries.

  • @DeegoL9
    @DeegoL96 жыл бұрын

    What about molten salt reactors?

  • @TeddyKrimsony

    @TeddyKrimsony

    6 жыл бұрын

    or Gas Reactors

  • @PJSM94

    @PJSM94

    6 жыл бұрын

    Or breeding reactors.

  • @bazookajoe6133

    @bazookajoe6133

    5 жыл бұрын

    +Jed Miller aka my bedroom

  • @Kian139

    @Kian139

    5 жыл бұрын

    It is the same process in molten salt reactors.

  • @RChamp116

    @RChamp116

    5 жыл бұрын

    Normally the fluid that absorbs the energy from the nuclear reaction is water (Under pressure) which converts to superheated steam. This is called the working fluid. Well, molten salt, gas, or even sulfur can be a working fluid.

  • @semanavidi8694
    @semanavidi86944 жыл бұрын

    This was by far the best presentation that I have ever seen on the subject. Thanks Dr. Tyson, I met you at Wright Sate University in Dayton Ohio.

  • @richarddavis5976
    @richarddavis5976Ай бұрын

    The best! Thank you all for doing what you do

  • @faragar1791
    @faragar17916 жыл бұрын

    I wonder what Neil's thoughts would be on Thorium Molten Salt Reactors?

  • @anuragshah6243

    @anuragshah6243

    6 жыл бұрын

    I'd think he'd think they'd be cool, cuz like molten salt reactors are cool af (not temperature wise though)

  • @Fangoros

    @Fangoros

    6 жыл бұрын

    Would love to see his opinion on it. Because for now, all I read about it seems too good to be true, but if a popular scientist would commend it, that would make it amazing.

  • @timframe570

    @timframe570

    6 жыл бұрын

    Would love to see one of the big science names support the MSRs. Gen 4 reactors have huge potential.

  • @jamesgodfrey2102

    @jamesgodfrey2102

    6 жыл бұрын

    They are a bad design. You need to first understand Neutron Thermalization requirements. We, US designed reactors use water to both remove the heat and to thermalize neutrons, this way, if we lost water, there is no way possible to sustain a reaction.

  • @timframe570

    @timframe570

    6 жыл бұрын

    James Godfrey I want to preface that I believe nuclear is the solution to our power needs and support nuclear power in general. The MSR, however is a better design then LWRs for some essential reasons. First the MSR is walk away safe. This is possible for several reasons. The MSR is designed to operate at high temperatures and is already in a liquid homogeneous form. As the temperature increases in an uncontrollable situation a salt plug will intentionally melt where the reaction fluid will drain into a kill tank. This tank has neutron absorbing materials killing the fission process. The LWR relies on water and due to the temperature requirements for the power generation cycle, it must operate at high pressures. The high pressures require pressure vessels and a massive containment dome that dramatically increase cost and the severity of a meltdown is higher due to the potential pressure vessel rupture. The water itself is an issue due to the fact that free neutrons cause water to break into its components and must be recombine to recycled. Additionally the MSR being a homogeneous fluid is far more fuel efficient than solid fuel reactors. Within the MSR we can use thorium, used fuel rods and decommissioned nuclear weapons as fuel. The waste streams half-life is considerably shorter in the range of 300 years rather than 100,000+. There are technical challenges with reprocessing and others but these can be solved.

  • @johnhege6502
    @johnhege65022 жыл бұрын

    Always considered it a testimony to the genius of man to be able to develop such an incredibly complicated, expensive and dangerous way to boil water.

  • @gphiproductions
    @gphiproductions6 жыл бұрын

    Very cool! Always cool to learn something new! I greatly appreciate this channel and the information that you guys bring!

  • @strikercwl
    @strikercwl6 жыл бұрын

    I have known all of this for years yet still I watch, such is the power of Neil and Chuck. It gives hope to see people who are passionate about science.

  • @codythelee573
    @codythelee5736 жыл бұрын

    N🌞 Nukes....to funny..

  • @ChintanPandya01

    @ChintanPandya01

    6 жыл бұрын

    Too*

  • @TommoCarroll

    @TommoCarroll

    6 жыл бұрын

    Haha, you can imagine Neil making sure to stop that person just to explain this to them aha!

  • @tertiary7

    @tertiary7

    6 жыл бұрын

    hopefully they were being ironic. ;)

  • @Duncan_Idaho_Potato

    @Duncan_Idaho_Potato

    6 жыл бұрын

    Don't think they were consciously being ironic. I think the point was supposed to be that we should use solar power instead of nuclear power. The irony (for those who don't get it) is that the sun IS a nuclear (fusion) reactor that is 333,000 times the mass of Earth. Granted, it's 150,000,000 km (93,000,000 miles) away, but it's a nuclear reactor nonetheless.

  • @codythelee573

    @codythelee573

    6 жыл бұрын

    Still ..it's punny though..:P

  • @ojeshbogati7251
    @ojeshbogati72514 жыл бұрын

    NdGT: I am a child trapped in a man's body. 2:13. His words not mine.

  • @topaz.
    @topaz.4 жыл бұрын

    I love it when stuff is explained clearly and it just fits together and makes sense.

  • @widget3672
    @widget36724 жыл бұрын

    I love the dynamic between these two. I want to just sit and watch them at a bar... With a friendly neutron...

  • @stevenl9395
    @stevenl93956 жыл бұрын

    Don’t you usually use uranium 235 atoms, which create 3 and not 2 new neutrons?

  • @star.soaked.wanderer

    @star.soaked.wanderer

    6 жыл бұрын

    Steven Lormuß well, not me, personally, no

  • @orionred2489

    @orionred2489

    6 жыл бұрын

    I had to go look it up. It seems the number of neutrons varies depending in the speed of the incoming neutron. The equation I found for u235 shows the numbers as 2.4

  • @animeluver536

    @animeluver536

    6 жыл бұрын

    no, uranimum 235 creates 2.03 neutrons per fission.

  • @orionred2489

    @orionred2489

    6 жыл бұрын

    Sorry, I thought that meant like an average for calculating the yield or something.

  • @AmazingJayB51

    @AmazingJayB51

    6 жыл бұрын

    Curious, where do they get the neutron from to start the reaction?🤔

  • @coreymay918
    @coreymay9186 жыл бұрын

    solar power is nuclear power

  • @hyperx72

    @hyperx72

    5 жыл бұрын

    Just at a safe distance

  • @alecnolastname4362

    @alecnolastname4362

    4 жыл бұрын

    It's to bad it's not hot enough to boil water to spin a turbine. Maybe with a large enough lense.....

  • @rossking3872
    @rossking38726 жыл бұрын

    Huge fan. Keep the science flowing

  • @milipedecentipede2005
    @milipedecentipede20056 жыл бұрын

    Could you explain kinetic kill in detail PLEASE.... have been really wanting to know about it for quite sometime now THANKS!!

  • @LRBO
    @LRBO4 жыл бұрын

    God bless Neil Degrasse Tyson ❤

  • @mactassio21
    @mactassio216 жыл бұрын

    0:20 Back then, the church people were calling it proof that hell exist. The god of the gap folks.

  • @GreyPunkWolf

    @GreyPunkWolf

    4 жыл бұрын

    They'd also tell all parents that if their children were playing RP games instead of football that would lead to them being possessed by demons. Sooooooo yeah this is far from any scientific method, in fact they do the exact opposite and try to make it look like a fact when it's just biaised info with no evidence and no method, just to prove a point they otherwise wouldn't be able to, using emotions and feelings as proofs where they are in fact the very reason of why their method is wrong and far from any science. Sad days. Loads of church people have been huge pioneers in sciences over the centuries, it's so sad to see obscurantism go back up IMO.

  • @kevins8575
    @kevins85754 жыл бұрын

    Great series!

  • @IvanValienteGoogle
    @IvanValienteGoogle6 жыл бұрын

    Awesome video! Clear explanations and animations.

  • @Barsabus
    @Barsabus6 жыл бұрын

    The universe is just a tool music video and it's all good.

  • @vaibhavdighe344
    @vaibhavdighe3446 жыл бұрын

    Only nerds like me laugh on the bar joke 😂

  • @TommoCarroll

    @TommoCarroll

    6 жыл бұрын

    And it's a beautiful thing to accept it and have a little chuckle! Always good to come across a fellow nerd on this platform! How's life Vaibhav, you nerd!?

  • @ro3062

    @ro3062

    6 жыл бұрын

    Aspect Science since he hasn't replied, I'd like to step in. But life is great. You know, living on that pineal gland potential which gives me nuclear energy for instinctive survivability. I'm sure we all relate. How's your life ?lol

  • @vaibhavdighe344

    @vaibhavdighe344

    6 жыл бұрын

    Peter Parker lol you're absolutely right

  • @vaibhavdighe344

    @vaibhavdighe344

    6 жыл бұрын

    Aspect Science life is pretty good btw

  • @TommoCarroll

    @TommoCarroll

    6 жыл бұрын

    Peter Parker, thanks for the reply :) ....was that a remarkably science-orientated explanation of your namesake's spidey sense...?!?!?!?!?

  • @eriklogann
    @eriklogann6 жыл бұрын

    I like this format. Please do more like this

  • @BuyBBStonk
    @BuyBBStonk6 жыл бұрын

    This is great stuff. I hope teachers play videos like these for students nowadays. Succient and engaging content for all viewers.

  • @michaelkrenciprock7736
    @michaelkrenciprock77366 жыл бұрын

    Neil ... run for president! Don't argue, just do it.

  • @michaelkrenciprock7736

    @michaelkrenciprock7736

    6 жыл бұрын

    Paul Ryder ... well someone intelligent needs to take the helm, to make legislation decisions! He is the most down to earth.

  • @CarFreeSegnitz

    @CarFreeSegnitz

    6 жыл бұрын

    Neil knows his physics, he understands public relations. But he has zero public service experience. No school board. No city government. No state or federal government experience. Not sure he'd want to anyway, as an elected official he'd have to talk about stuff other than space and physics.

  • @gordonmcdowell

    @gordonmcdowell

    6 жыл бұрын

    Opportunity cost. He is effective doing what he does too. Might be less so (but perhaps more so) as a candidate.

  • @LetterRedMedia
    @LetterRedMedia6 жыл бұрын

    We need nuclear power. And alot more of it.

  • @0ooTheMAXXoo0

    @0ooTheMAXXoo0

    5 жыл бұрын

    Very expensive to build compared to any other way of generating electricity and you cannot ramp them up or down quickly so you still need energy balancing like with renewables... There is good reason nuclear is not talked about very much anymore, even solar photoelectric generation has been cheaper to build out than nuclear for at least 30 years...

  • @CarlosD7
    @CarlosD76 жыл бұрын

    Congrats on 500k

  • @ethanvans
    @ethanvans6 жыл бұрын

    This was massively informative!!!

  • @alduin648
    @alduin6486 жыл бұрын

    Roses are red, violets are blue, I’m not first, AND NIETHER WERE YOU

  • @NetAndyCz

    @NetAndyCz

    6 жыл бұрын

    violets are violet unless you are colorblind/poet.

  • @farianblinder9130

    @farianblinder9130

    6 жыл бұрын

    Wait, aren't violet purple 😃?

  • @gunsmoke97

    @gunsmoke97

    6 жыл бұрын

    there are blue violets just like there are white roses

  • @DANGJOS

    @DANGJOS

    6 жыл бұрын

    Why is violet made with blue and red if it's a spectral color?

  • @gunsmoke97

    @gunsmoke97

    6 жыл бұрын

    what you learned about colors in art is different than how light actually works

  • @JakisoTheArtist
    @JakisoTheArtist6 жыл бұрын

    Who cares about being first??

  • @TommoCarroll

    @TommoCarroll

    6 жыл бұрын

    EVERYONE. THIS. IS. KZread (read: SPARTA)

  • @glenralph5123

    @glenralph5123

    6 жыл бұрын

    Jakiso The Artist : Kids, trolls and people who cling to the smallest things.

  • @nwabuezeozuzu6370
    @nwabuezeozuzu63702 жыл бұрын

    Refreshed my memory and thought me new things about nuclear fission, fusion and iron. I'm so grateful 💞

  • @Kremtimi
    @Kremtimi6 жыл бұрын

    Love these kind of videos, thanks!

  • @noiseshapes
    @noiseshapes6 жыл бұрын

    If we want climate action fast, nuclear is the way.

  • @0ooTheMAXXoo0

    @0ooTheMAXXoo0

    5 жыл бұрын

    Why? All other forms of electrical power generation are cheaper to build out. Nuclear plants cannot ramp up or down fast enough to balance the grid so they face the same situation as renewables except you have far greater cost to build and cost of fuel and no nuclear power plant has yet included the cost of storing nuclear waste safely for over 10,000 years.

  • @davsaa33
    @davsaa336 жыл бұрын

    First

  • @drzl

    @drzl

    6 жыл бұрын

    Good for you

  • @JVLdesign
    @JVLdesign6 жыл бұрын

    Always a delight to hear Neil

  • @vallejodroning9578
    @vallejodroning95784 жыл бұрын

    These are super fun to watch

Келесі