GLOBAL WINDS AND JET STREAMS

Пікірлер: 49

  • @prosperesin
    @prosperesin4 жыл бұрын

    Your videos has been very helpful for my pilot exams ❤❤❤❤

  • @FlyOrDie2000
    @FlyOrDie20006 ай бұрын

    I've seen a lot of videos about those topics, but nobody did explain it as good as you did! thank you so much, you are helping me a lot with my pilot studies! ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

  • @ginaodoherty2363
    @ginaodoherty23636 жыл бұрын

    This video gave very clear explanations of Air Pressure, Global Winds, etc...

  • @joshuajohny2489
    @joshuajohny24895 ай бұрын

    Good Explanations. You should have dived deeper into the reasons for the formation of jet streams and their effects on climate.

  • @sohailanjum9830
    @sohailanjum98307 жыл бұрын

    so informative thanks

  • @ravenken
    @ravenken7 жыл бұрын

    Nice simple explanation of the jet stream.

  • @jwilkinson987
    @jwilkinson9878 жыл бұрын

    This is fantastic! Thanks

  • @Ruhan900
    @Ruhan9008 жыл бұрын

    thanks good explanation

  • @marcoduran4318
    @marcoduran43184 жыл бұрын

    Excellent class, thanks

  • @gregoryselner7261
    @gregoryselner72612 жыл бұрын

    Very educational. Thank You 😊

  • @chandunaalla107
    @chandunaalla1075 жыл бұрын

    If convevtion circulation is there, you might have to differentiated the formation of jetstreams too. That is want i want. I would be happy if u add this

  • @jaybk718
    @jaybk7188 жыл бұрын

    good explanation

  • @dylancurran1660
    @dylancurran16604 жыл бұрын

    this is such a classic

  • @harlankraft578
    @harlankraft5784 жыл бұрын

    Excellent presentation one thing I might add is there a lot of electrons involved in the weather!

  • @grindupBaker
    @grindupBaker2 жыл бұрын

    The Jet Streams exist because the Coriolis Effect formula is: Acceleration (West--->East) = f (Velocity Equator--->Pole, Latitude) and that has "Velocity" on the right but it has "Acceleration" on the left, which makes it highly-geometrically increasing.

  • @grindupBaker
    @grindupBaker2 жыл бұрын

    Incorrect sequence at 8:30. Item 5 comes earlier, immediately after the land ocean temperature difference expansion contraction. The "produces an area of low pressure" at 9:30 and "air above it will be cooler which produces high pressure" at 9:50 have the cart before the horse vis-a-vis high-altitude air flow at item 5 because it is this high-altitude air flow at item 5 which causes the low pressure & high pressure zones due to air mass moving from one place to the other. So the explanation S.B. reworked to get that air flow ahead of the low & high pressures. Otherwise, nice video talk.

  • @grindupBaker
    @grindupBaker2 жыл бұрын

    The underlying heat-adjustment effect works like this: --------- "GREENHOUSE EFFECT", TRYING TO WARM IF THE QUANTITY INCREASES - The "greenhouse effect" in Earth's troposphere operates like this: Some of the "LWR" aka "infrared" radiation heading up gets absorbed into cloud above instead of going to space so that's the "heat trapping" effect of a cloud. The top portion of the cloud radiates up some of the LWR radiation that's manufactured inside the cloud but it's less amount than the LWR that was absorbed into the bottom of the cloud because the cloud top is colder than below the cloud and colder things radiate less than warmer things. That is PRECISELY the "greenhouse effect" in Earth's troposphere. It's the "greenhouse effect" of liquid "water" and solid "ice" in that example. You can see that "greenhouse effect" of liquid "water" and solid "ice" for all the various places on Earth from CERES satellite instrument at kzread.info/dash/bejne/nXlluKR8pJutfMY.html at 7:50. It's the pink one labelled "Longwave....26.2 w / m**2" so cloud globally has a "greenhouse effect" of 26.2 w / m**2. - Solids in the troposphere have the exact same effect as the "cloud greenhouse effect" above for the exact same reason. - Infrared-active gases in the troposphere (H2O gas, CO2, CH4, N2O, O3, CFCs) have the exact same effect as the "cloud greenhouse effect" above for the exact same reason. Non infrared-active gases in the troposphere (N2, O2, Ar) have no "greenhouse effect" because their molecule is too simple to get the vibrational kinetic energy by absorbing a photon of LWR radiation or by collision. The "greenhouse effect" really is that simple, and it's utterly 100% certain. --------- SUNSHINE REFLECTION EFFECT, TRYING TO COOL IF THE QUANTITY INCREASES - Clouds (liquid "water" and solid "ice") absorb & reflect some sunlight and the "reflect" part has an attempt-to-cool effect, which has nothing whatsoever to do with the "greenhouse effect". You can see that "sunlight reflection attempt-to-cool effect" of liquid "water" and solid "ice" for all the various places on Earth from CERES satellite instrument at kzread.info/dash/bejne/nXlluKR8pJutfMY.html at 7:50. It's the blue one labelled "Shortwave....-47.3 w / m**2" so cloud globally has a sunshine reflection effect of 47.3 w / m**2. - Solids in the troposphere absorb & reflect some sunlight and the "reflect" part has an attempt-to-cool effect, which has nothing whatsoever to do with the "greenhouse effect". - Infrared-active gases in the troposphere (H2O gas, CO2, CH4, N2O, O3, CFCs) do not absorb or reflect any sunlight (minor note: except a tiny portion in the high-frequency ultraviolet where O2 & O3 has absorbed most of it already in the stratosphere above the troposphere). --------- NET EFFECT OF THE 2 ENTIRELY-DIFFERENT EFFECTS DESCRIBED ABOVE - The net result of the 2 entirely-different "cloud" effects is that clouds have a net cooling effect of 21.1 w / m**2 as seen in the blue-hues pictorial at left on screen at either of my 2 GooglesTubes links above. - The net result for solids in the troposphere is a net cooling effect because the change in this effect by humans is the "global dimming" atmospheric aerosols air pollution effect and that's a cooling effect (separate from its cloud change effect). - The net result for infrared-active gases in the troposphere (H2O gas, CO2, CH4, N2O, O3, CFCs) is a warming effect because their 2nd effect above is negligible, essentially zero. --------- Cartoons or text that describe a "greenhouse effect" in which photons from the surface are absorbed by infrared-active gas molecules and then are re-emitted with 50% of it going down and warming the surface are incorrect because they do not include a tropospheric temperature lapse rate which is an absolute requirement. Explanations of the "greenhouse effect" which include phrases like "the radiation from the surface does not directly heat the atmosphere" are incorrect because there are simple laboratory experiments which prove that infrared radiation does indeed heat the CO2 infrared-active gas and its surroundings (which means, of course, that molecular vibrational kinetic energy is converted on collision to molecular translational kinetic energy before it happened to "thermally relax" and emit a photon and thus no photon was "re-emitted" in that case). ++++++++++ Cloudy winter nights don't cool as much as clear-sky winter nights. It is PRECISELY the "greenhouse effect" in Earth's troposphere which causes that.

  • @teacoffee8401
    @teacoffee84014 жыл бұрын

    this was so helpful

  • @glblb3030
    @glblb3030 Жыл бұрын

    kind of interesting,,,,thanks

  • @martin7michael
    @martin7michael8 жыл бұрын

    better than reading in a book...

  • @timbennett5378

    @timbennett5378

    4 жыл бұрын

    Martin Michael Torma yessir

  • @timbennett5378
    @timbennett53784 жыл бұрын

    I have a test on monday😂 Thx very much 😫

  • @anthreas
    @anthreas6 жыл бұрын

    Does that mean that during summertime the barometer by the seaside would be showing low values? Wouldn’t it be high readings due to good weather?

  • @captainshipman7377

    @captainshipman7377

    4 жыл бұрын

    anthreas high and low pressure doesn’t directly equate to weather, nor does it directly equate to temperature. You can have a hot, low pressure, good weather day, or a cold, high pressure bad weather day. It’s complicated and it’s usually not black or white, as they explain in basic weather theory

  • @marymalyushytska3708
    @marymalyushytska37088 жыл бұрын

    I watched this in school

  • @bobleclair5665
    @bobleclair56655 жыл бұрын

    Plant more trees,,co2 is plant food,,trees cool the planet and gives us oxygen

  • @magcarb5489
    @magcarb54894 жыл бұрын

    I'm watching because I plan to fly in the jet stream in a wingsuit.

  • @dgc9147

    @dgc9147

    3 жыл бұрын

    So how'd it go?

  • @magcarb5489

    @magcarb5489

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@dgc9147 still in training, it might be a while!😟

  • @grindupBaker

    @grindupBaker

    2 жыл бұрын

    You know about Icarus right ? Use an altimeter to avoid flying too close to the Sun.

  • @ericpham4011
    @ericpham40114 жыл бұрын

    everything connected to weather from human transportation to the electrical usages to the the forest management to axis of earth rotation or earth speed of rotation

  • @michaeldose2041
    @michaeldose20413 жыл бұрын

    We live in the temperate area not to hot not to cold. I guess she's never been to death valley.

  • @vincentslanter7776
    @vincentslanter77768 жыл бұрын

    lol I watched this in class

  • @lalonahmed4235
    @lalonahmed42357 жыл бұрын

    thank

  • @0.-.0
    @0.-.05 жыл бұрын

    Thanks

  • @luva74
    @luva746 жыл бұрын

    The poles are not colder because they are farther from the sun as described in the blow torch analogy near the beginning of the video. This video is very misleading in its explanations. This will confuse kids that are trying to learn about this subject.

  • @lee9953

    @lee9953

    5 жыл бұрын

    She’s talking about the angle, I think. The angle of the sun’s rays are more oblique at the poles than they are at the equator. The rays have a shorter distance to travel to hit the equator which bulges outward from the earth’s center toward the sun. I think this is what she means. A look at her illustration makes that pretty clear, without getting into the tilt of the earth on its axis and all of that. Overall she explains it better than many other attempts I’ve heard.

  • @Albrey

    @Albrey

    4 жыл бұрын

    Agree! I also heard that being said and it is inaccurate.

  • @Albrey

    @Albrey

    4 жыл бұрын

    But @@lee9953 the distance that the rays have to travel is irellevant.

  • @christopherfranks478

    @christopherfranks478

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@Albrey research power of electromagnetic waves. The power falls off with the inverse square of the distance. So the distance the em fields travel absolutely matter. Granted, the distance isnt the only thing that makes the poles cold, but distance is relevant.

  • @bugsbunny9295
    @bugsbunny92952 жыл бұрын

    Sam

  • @marosmark679
    @marosmark6792 жыл бұрын

    Manipulation jetstream...klimakontrol

  • @thebestofallworlds187
    @thebestofallworlds1875 жыл бұрын

    Problem: the Earth is flat.

  • @nesehatadesse185

    @nesehatadesse185

    5 жыл бұрын

    no it's not its round...smh

  • @mailtoparam

    @mailtoparam

    4 жыл бұрын

    It ain't flat boi

  • @oceandrew

    @oceandrew

    4 жыл бұрын

    What??? Only one flat-earther in the crowd? I'm shocked.

  • @thebestofallworlds187

    @thebestofallworlds187

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@oceandrew ok, the Earth is round, but Hitler wasn't the bad guy he's been made out to be. Try 5 minutes of this video if you have the balls to: www.bitchute.com/video/GcnwSQFVzRoA/