GepRC offers 2 versions of this quad - one called the Cinebot 25 S (the one I have in the video) which has more powerful motors (1505 4300KV) and another more standard one, the Cinebot25, which has 1404 4600KV motors. Keep that in mind when you're shopping for this quad. -Mike

@tristanturner

4 ай бұрын

What rates would you use on this if you were to modify it?

Another good review Mike

@DroneSupremacy

4 ай бұрын

Many thanks for the continuous support 🙌🏼

very cool Mike! Nice review brother

@DroneSupremacy

4 ай бұрын

Thanks man appreciate you 🙏🏼

Cool review! Thanks

@DroneSupremacy

4 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching!

nice vid and happy for ur sponsoring.. one day maybe a company will ofer something to present :D

@DroneSupremacy

4 ай бұрын

The video is not sponsored, i would have said if it was

Nice little Avata alternative. Bind and Fly FPV quads have come a long way. Great for individuals who are getting started or even for those experience pilots that do not want to mess around with building.

@DroneSupremacy

4 ай бұрын

Very well said bro 🙌🏼

We have the same weather here now in Montreal hehe. It's grey and the trees haven't bloomed yet. Spring is on March 21 after all haha. Thanks for sharing your impressions on this little Geprc drone! I can't wait to put my Geprc Cinelog 35 V2 outside! Oh, one question though: do you think this Geprc Cinelog 20 would drift in 15km/h winds? Because my old iFlight Protek 25 was always pushed by the smallest of winds and it got annoying.

@DroneSupremacy

4 ай бұрын

Yes i think it would drift! These small quads never tend to cope well with strong winds, so I think if you want to use something like this it should be in very calm weather.

I'm currently struggling geting my first O3 Setup. Flying Quads with Analog Systems for quite a time. Currently still Flying an QAV270 with F3 and a Beta FPV Meteor 75. Would you rather pick up this one or a 2 Inch Quad like the YMZFPV Starship X1?

I wonder which is more refined and controllable 25 or 30? Sometimes have problems with throttle resolution

*Хаха , делфинарника . Живея /когато съм в бг / на 100-тина метра от него . Хубаво място за фоткане .* 👍

@DroneSupremacy

4 ай бұрын

Супер е! Спокойно и приятно място :)

Perhaps a dumb question but I am reentering the hobby. With a drone like this (with O3), what else do you need besides the lipos? Is all you need the DJI goggles 2 and a DJI controller? Or can you use a different remote like my Spectrum?

@kez850

2 ай бұрын

Wondering this as well. From what I’ve gathered it comes down to which option you pick on the website. PNP should be a DJI controller, ELRS and TBS Nano are the other 2 radio technologies that require a radio (controller) that can connect to whichever one respectively. So in your case you’d want to see if your spektrum radio can function with ELRS 2.4ghz or TBS Nano RX.

@canofanger

2 ай бұрын

@@kez850 Thanks for the input. I have heard recommendations not to use the DJI remote controller with the O3 system as if you lose the video link, the RC link fails as well. I'll check about ELRS on the Spectrum but have a feeling it wouldn't work.

If I buy the Cinebot 25s + O3 + Dji goggles v2... which controller should I use? A Dji one too? Or is there a better option?

@DroneSupremacy

2 ай бұрын

Radiomaster Pocket or Radiomaster Boxer are the ones I recommend with this setup. You'll need to select a receiver though (ELRS is the most popular option)

what's the difference with cinelog 25 v2?

@ZacharyIqbal

2 ай бұрын

The cinelog 25 v2 is slightly lighter, has a dampener on the GoPro mount and slightly more stuff going on with the frame setup. The cinebot 25 sacrifices a little more weight for slightly thicker carbon fiber, more durable plastic and slightly better flight performance. They're both pretty similar but the cinelog 25 v2 might lean a little more to traditional cinewhoop work and the cinebot 25 a little more on the freestyle/fun flights.

Cinelog25 is better for indoor real estate?

@DroneSupremacy

4 ай бұрын

They'd both work well, this exact one might be a bit too powerful for indoor shooting though! Better check out their regular Cinebot25.

@bluefpv3263

4 ай бұрын

check out the cinelog 20 for that its avaiable with analog aswell than you put on a naked gropro which is handling light changes a bit better than the o3

@ldnwalkandfly8617

4 ай бұрын

@@bluefpv3263 20 got too short flight time less 4min without gopro, 25 is better, I need 60min with gopro

Nice if there is absolutely NO wind

@DroneSupremacy

4 ай бұрын

Even in moderate winds this would still perform well!

that "you can see branches" argument i such bullshit ... you didnt even dodge the branch you see less branches with the o3 than you would with other systems with those light conditions there are arguments to be made for the o3 but seeing branches isnt one of them

@DroneSupremacy

4 ай бұрын

With any other system you just see a blurry mess, so even being aware of your surroundings is a huge benefit for me.

@bluefpv3263

4 ай бұрын

@@DroneSupremacythats just not true im not sure what videosystems you are referring to but you can see branches with all videosystems maybe not if you got a tinywhoop with a shitty analog cam but otherwise you can see branches just fine

@Porculus

27 күн бұрын

@@bluefpv3263 It's obvious that you've never flown on the DJI O3 system, because if you had, you would know that there is NO question that between analog and digital O3, the latter offers far more detail when flying through branches. Tiny branches often just do not even get rendered on analog. I have both analog and digital and analog doesn't even come close. Stop being hard-headed and just defending analog like some zealot fanboy and at least go borrow someone's digital system and have a see for yourself instead of just insisting analog is just as good for flying through branches.

@bluefpv3263

27 күн бұрын

​@@Porculus i have flown dji and the picture is great but its fricking expansive i dont want to fly a 250€ video system in a freestyle quad and i have problems adjusting to the latency for me its not worth it aspecially with the non existing compatability if i would want to change all my quads to dji so i can fly them with one set of goggles that would be way to expensive maybe you should fly some analog again cause with good goggles and good cam you see branches just fine with analog get a foxeer trex and a skyzone04 and see for yourself

@Porculus

27 күн бұрын

@@bluefpv3263 Yes, I agree that O3 is expensive and it's not for everybody, at the asking price. Especially if you like to fly several quads on a regular basis. But if you narrow it down to just two or three quads, and upgrade, it would probably be feasible for you. Some quads just need to be shelved for good anyway. But that's a personal opinion. I still like flying my faster 5 inch race quad on analogue, but the video quality is so bad after flying mostly on digital. After you make the move to the digital, it's REALLY hard to accept the much lower resolution image of analogue. I don't doubt that there are newer analogue cameras that will be superior to my outdated analogue camera on my 5 inch quad, but it still won't compare to digital. Cheers!