George Daniels - Persuading Omega to take an interest in the co-axial escapement (48/85)

Ғылым және технология

To listen to more of George Daniels’s stories, go to the playlist:
• George Daniels (Master...
English watch-maker George Daniels (1926-2011) was most famous for creating the co-axial escarpment and could make a complete watch by hand. In his lifetime, he received many awards, including the rarely-given Gold Medal of the Clockmakers' Company of London. [Listener: Roger Smith; date recorded: 2003]
TRANSCRIPT: It was with great optimism I started to go round to Swiss factories and became more and more despondent with each visit when I realised that not only would they not look at it, but they wouldn't have understood it if they had looked at it. And those who were showing any interest in it at all were only concerned for me to place with them an order for several million escapements so that it would keep their factory going and I would be left with all these escapements and no watches. So, that was no good. And I just kept up this bombardment of the industry for nearly 20 years and I tried every trick I knew to get them interested and even to look at it, even to try and understand it. But they seemed very satisfied with their own methods and weren't going to be bothered to interrupt their production for my ideas.
And then one day I met a young man at the La Chaux-de-Fonds Museum who was quite bright and very interested in the escapement and he engaged me in conversation about it. So I was much encouraged by that and he liked the idea and thought it was very progressive. Of course, he had no power to do anything, he was simply an apprentice. But eventually he went to the Omega company and while he was there he managed to persuade them to take an interest in the escapement, which I took along and showed them and at last I was beginning to find a company that was willing to consider them and study it to discover its merits. Prior to that I'd gone to one or two companies and they wouldn't... although they took a passing interest in it, they wouldn't manufacture it, and I did in fact spend some two or three years, four years I think, with Patek Philippe producing escapements, but their workmen didn't seem to be very interested in it. They couldn't believe that there was anyone who could make something that would be better than anything they made and it was pretty plain to me that, you know, I wasn't Swiss and therefore the old saying of not invented here was being pretty heavily applied to me and they weren't going to take an interest in it. Indeed, my impression was they were going to some trouble to make it impossible for it to work, and so I got tired of them and left. And then I met the young man from Omega and took it up with the Omega Company, and they've been at it now for about seven years, so called developing the escapement. There was nothing to develop, it was fully developed when I gave it to them and indeed their designs for the escapement now are still identical to mine. So they've developed nothing, excepting the methods of mass production, which were very, very difficult and one must give them every credit for cracking all the problems and producing these very, very accurate components, working to tolerances of a thousandth of a millimetre. Now that's a very small dimension, but they worked to those dimensions on this escapement.
And it was launched two or three years ago and a lot of noise was made about it. We went all around the world to almost every country showing it and explaining it, and everyone was very enthusiastic about it. The curious thing is that once Omega had taken it up then everyone was very pleased to agree that it was worthwhile, but somebody important had to take it up before they would agree that it was of any practical use. And at the present moment it's in production with Omega who've sold many thousands of examples. Exactly what the performance of these watches has been over the past few years I don't really know. I only know the performance of my own watches, which are made in the Isle of Man with my then assistant, Roger - what's your name?
[RS] Smith.
Smith, Roger Smith. And we made them with my assistant, Roger Smith, and we agree they keep cracking time and we had no occasion for not being absolutely honest about it. They're good watches and go very well and far exceed the performance of any lever escapement. So as far as he and I are concerned, and it's my problem rather than his, I'm very happy that this is the escapement for the watch... the mechanical watch of the future.

Пікірлер: 24

  • @jpogigtxcr1778
    @jpogigtxcr17785 жыл бұрын

    This movement is reason why I chose a Seamaster over a Submariner.

  • @StephanJPPL

    @StephanJPPL

    2 жыл бұрын

    Same here. My Seamaster 300 has an accuracy of about +0.2 sec per day. During nights it stands on the crown which seems to be the best "sleeping" position.

  • @deemdoubleu
    @deemdoubleu6 жыл бұрын

    The Swiss "not invented here syndrome" was quite ironic since the lever escapement wasn't invented there anyway.

  • @Mark-lj1dj
    @Mark-lj1dj9 ай бұрын

    Its funny that Omega sort of bothered to give his escapement a chance. Now it's their biggest selling point. It's the major reason Omega beats Rolex, other than price point.

  • @bharatc.sampat6406
    @bharatc.sampat64065 жыл бұрын

    Thank You for your genius and deciphering the hype God be with you

  • @stevefox8605
    @stevefox86052 жыл бұрын

    Legend 🇬🇧👍🏻

  • @rage8kage
    @rage8kage3 жыл бұрын

    It's a crying shame he bothered to pursue omega. He liked the prestige. He had a thought of his own legacy that's the problem. If he hadn't the faintest idea of his own greatness. He would have brought the new escapement to the world 20yrs earlier with some Japanese maker who would bite his hands off. He also wanted to prove to the best Swiss makers that he's better than them. So he wasted 20yrs with them. And Now his name isn't even on all these coaxials. Real shame

  • @IrishScribbler

    @IrishScribbler

    2 жыл бұрын

    What the fuck are you on about? Omega wasn’t the only Swiss watch manufacturer offered the co axial movement. Zenith and Rolex were too. Omega, however, were the only ones intelligent enough to use the lovely and good luck to them. They are an amazing watchmaker.

  • @rage8kage

    @rage8kage

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@IrishScribbler that's exactly it. They're all Swiss watch makers. He really wanted to stick it to the swiss. He should have went to Seiko with his invention

  • @ericashmusic8889
    @ericashmusic88896 жыл бұрын

    This just goes to prove something I discovered around 1964. despite all the Hype-

  • @Orrico84Harp
    @Orrico84Harp2 жыл бұрын

    Mah Hero! Watch Hero

  • @infinitytoinfinitysquaredb7836
    @infinitytoinfinitysquaredb78364 жыл бұрын

    Build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a path to your door. Build a better watch and time stands still.

  • @juniorjohnson5961
    @juniorjohnson59613 жыл бұрын

    From what I've been able to find they waited until the patent expired and then supposedly improved it and he got nothing !

  • @ALL-il1sw

    @ALL-il1sw

    Жыл бұрын

    That's just what Rolex fans say🤣

  • @Mpayne1472

    @Mpayne1472

    Жыл бұрын

    @@ALL-il1sw absolutely nothing wrong with being a Rolex fan. I have been a fan since 1989 and I find no reason to change my allegiance thank you.

  • @ALL-il1sw

    @ALL-il1sw

    Жыл бұрын

    @@Mpayne1472 stay strong bro, nothing wrong with that. just don't spread hate or perpetuate lies on other brands.

  • @Mpayne1472

    @Mpayne1472

    Жыл бұрын

    @@ALL-il1sw never have

  • @crobulari2328
    @crobulari23286 жыл бұрын

    George should have taken it to say Seiko !!.

  • @Waltham1892

    @Waltham1892

    6 жыл бұрын

    Seiko has the Spring Drive, which is essentially an escapementless electro-mechanical watch. Its very innovative, but not a purely mechanical watch.

  • @markn3586

    @markn3586

    5 жыл бұрын

    Yes, Seiko kicked their butts in the observatory competitions after they were opened up to the world. That's why they no longer hold them!

  • @dedsert9653

    @dedsert9653

    10 күн бұрын

    the japanese are much more nationalist and protectionist than the swiss. what george daniels describes here is rather minor compared to what you would experience in france or germany even today.

  • @oclvcarbon123
    @oclvcarbon1232 жыл бұрын

    No way he asked Roger what his name is!! Come on!

  • @Mpayne1472

    @Mpayne1472

    Жыл бұрын

    You just didn’t understand the reference. He was giving Roger praise

  • @JustMeTalking

    @JustMeTalking

    4 ай бұрын

    ​@@Mpayne1472100% Agreed. It's British humour and a massive nod to his FULL NAME.

Келесі