Teenage Michael Chang's win against world #1 Ivan Lendl down 2 sets to 0 and then coming back from 2 sets to 1 to defeat world #3 Stefan Edberg in the final will always be one of the most magical runs in sporting history.

@jakehuang3545

Жыл бұрын

don't forget, he beat sampras there too.

I think Chang still holds the record for youngest ever men’s slam winner (French Open ‘89).

@cristianconstantinescu7264

3 жыл бұрын

Becker won Wimbledon at 17 and was a hell of a lot more entertaining than Pusher Chang

@hemil

3 жыл бұрын

But he didnt won in tennis, was ping pong

@hemil

3 жыл бұрын

@@cristianconstantinescu7264 Chang played better than Becker... chess.

@realmr2001

2 жыл бұрын

@@cristianconstantinescu7264 clearly you didn't watch any of Chang's matches in the '89 french open. Considering Chang's size, strength, and experience, especially 4th round vs. Lendl, he sure made one hell of a run to win the title.

@20891

2 жыл бұрын

@@realmr2001 he is just jealous racist

no applause at the end when Roger holds up his racket, they wanted Chang to win

@ricardoramos3754

2 жыл бұрын

i guess nobody expected much from that Feder...what was his last name?...

Great upload with excellent quality. I think this match took place just couple of months before Federer dethroned Sampras for 8th Wimbeldon title at SW19. At this stage Michael Chang was already in twillight of remarkable career and Federer was just up and coming with massive talent. You have to admire Michael Chang, such a legendary fighter and great player, he tried tenaciously even way off his best form. Credits to both great champions!

@kwl189

4 жыл бұрын

smart spacex I thought as well, Chang would be declining at this point. I’m surprised Chang made it this far. I didn’t think played past 1999/2000.

@varunshahvo-tv9854

4 жыл бұрын

Dethroned my ass

@jontakaki503

2 жыл бұрын

Federer lost to Tim Henman in straight sets in the last 16th at Wimbledon in 2001, just after overcoming Sampras in the 4th round. He didn't dethrone Sampras until 2017.

@kevinmurtagh4996

Жыл бұрын

@@varunshahvo-tv9854 Sampras was the 4 time-defending champion, and was on a 31 match win streak there. How would ending that run not be considered de-throning?

@Skiiiiiifreeeeeee

Жыл бұрын

@Kevin Murtagh it was a handing of the baton in hindsight but pete was in the middle of what would be a 2 year title drought with a plummeting ranking. It was not a sampras anywhere close to the height of his powers

That Federer Guy, he has a potential, Maybe someday he will win a slam, or two.

@hemil

3 жыл бұрын

I think that Roger guy was a bluff, he changed his name to Nick, Nick Kigios or so...

@kuls43

2 жыл бұрын

I won't wonder even if he wins 20 grand slams.

Looking closely i realized KZread, facebook and twitter did not exist at that time And i was only a year old And to see roger still playing OMFG What a treat for grown ups to see his career from start till now

@wdazeaphonflame9082

4 жыл бұрын

... I can tell your young 😂

@jdmresearch

4 жыл бұрын

Ok, but think about this: When Chang won RG, Federer was 8...

@Fahad-xn1lx

4 жыл бұрын

@@wdazeaphonflame9082 hahahhahahhah I guess i did disclose that info

@HIMYMTR

4 жыл бұрын

yeah, u missed some great matches kid, you missed the entire 2000s

@Leomerya12

Ай бұрын

You were born in 2000!? GTFO here.

Chang has this sheer desire to win and fight every point even Federer was the better player. This is something missing in our so called new next gen players.

I remember watching Federer 2000-2002 and each time I said wow such a beautiful style and if this guy puts everything together he will a phenomenal talent.

At that point in his career Chang had been slowing down maybe half a step from the footspeed he once had from 1989 to `98, but it cost him dearly in ranking (he used to be no. 2 behind Sampras for quite some time) and in winning major titles (his last coming from 1997´s Indian Wells). Federer on the other hand was far away from his best, too, shown in quite a number of strange shot selections - his biggest problem in the early years of his career - not highlighted in this video. From 2002´s Hamburg title on, pieces were falling into place for Federer. - Anyway, thanks for the great upload and the memories. :)

8:39 A shot of genius ! ❤

That witty smile at 03:55

Awesome footage! The low level behind the baseline video in particular!

@alanchong7513

3 жыл бұрын

Feels like we are playing with that low behind the court view!

Roger is a legend. Allez to a champion. RESPECT!! ✊✊✊💪💪👍👍

@sachinrajpal76

4 жыл бұрын

Novak Djokovic u r a fake or not

@pkoppula

4 жыл бұрын

@@sachinrajpal76 fake because original YT account of Nole is DjokerNole

@sachinrajpal76

4 жыл бұрын

Thank u I was so confused

@sumnahlennon4516

4 жыл бұрын

Respect 💪🏿👍🏿

@ayankeshwani6667

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah My yt name is That because he is my idol

Back when 40-15 was no business for Roger.

@sumnahlennon4516

4 жыл бұрын

These Federer 40-15 jokes are killing me LOL. I suppose he only has himself to blame. 🙁

@thaiphan7692

4 жыл бұрын

Omg stop reminding me the nightmare again :(

@egdfbznz

4 жыл бұрын

The Return in '11 US Open had to be on his mind, even for the tiniest fraction of a second. That said, I think on his way to 103 other finals wins, 40-15 came up and wasn't a problem.

@ferguson7128

4 жыл бұрын

That return was a 1 in a 100 shot. The serve out wide worked so well, but at 40-15 he went for power through the middle. Would´ve definitely been an ace, but it clipped the tape. On second serve he got anxious, it was clearly visible. As Shashank said, he didn´t trust his bh which was so reliable that day. On 40-30 he went to the net which I also didn´t understand since he coped so well with Djokovic from the baseline. If you come to the net, do it with a good approach shot. It´s only tennis, there´re more important things in life, but Wimbledon 2019 will always be the biggest choke imo. Being in that position as a top player, 40-15 up having serve you gotta get the job done.

@nicolastg3377

4 жыл бұрын

XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Please upload Nalbandian vs Federer first meeting (Montecarlo 2002) I never saw a footage of that match

Federer looks like he’s playing in his school uniform😹

@edwinivanrodriguez3769

4 жыл бұрын

Jshdh Jakdhsba you looks like never go to the school

@nicolastg3377

4 жыл бұрын

@@edwinivanrodriguez3769 Says the dude unable to write properly.

@Tennis TV I hope you could upload more tennis matches of 90's because there were so much varieties of surfaces and players in that era, and that make matches more exciting and enjoyable. Below is my wish list: 93 & 96 Los Angeles Open final Richard Krajicek vs Michael Chang, 96 Chang vs Edberg(semifinal) 96 Wimbledon Richard Krajicek vs pete Sampras 96 Indian Wells Michael Chang vs Agassi(quarter), Chang vs Rios (semifinal) 93 & 95 Year-End Masters Cup round robin match Jim Courier vs Michael Chang 95 Masters Cup match Thomas Muster vs Chang 97 Indian Wells semifinal Chang vs Muster 98 Canadian Open Sampras vs Agassi, Krajicek vs Agassi 99 Key biscayne Lipton open Sampras vs Krajicek

@tennistv

4 жыл бұрын

thanks for the list, always useful - we'll see what we can do!

@Hypercube2

4 жыл бұрын

@@tennistv And for a more recent one, the double bagel from Goffin on Berdych in Rome!

That was awesome. Thanks :)

Le coup de squash du futur Maestro après un lob de Chang du pur génie Dommage il perd le point ... Roger maîtrisait déjà bien son slice de revers et son passing long ligne !! Merci pour cette vidéo du pur bonheur !!

00:41 such a young Federer move...

00:42 what a grunt from Federer

Michael Chang is a true hero from Taiwan.🇹🇼 Thank him for coaching Nishikori！ From Japan.

@hemil

3 жыл бұрын

Plastic tennis hero players from Taiwan?

@realmr2001

2 жыл бұрын

@@hemil your comment shows how ignorant you are....

@anseinueseima408

Ай бұрын

bruh he's american stop joking. He is indeed Taiwan by blood but that's Chinese lol

Very subdued clapping from the crowd after the win for Roger

@tennistv

4 жыл бұрын

we noticed the same!

@th8257

4 жыл бұрын

@@tennistv the applause throughout seems fairly quiet. Looking around it seems there are plenty of empty seats - I don't think this would have been considered one of the main matches at the time, and it looks like a lot of people were still at lunch. Let's not forget that very few people really knew about Federer then. He was just another young player who hadn't done anything worth noticing at that point.

3:57

Chang had such heart. But in big matches against bigger guys he looked like he was fighting gravity.

@boke75

3 жыл бұрын

Not gravity, more like altitude. Or rather, lack thereof. 😂

@tonyrappa4611

Жыл бұрын

He had to beat a lot of big guys along the way to win 34 titles

@martinsks.a8434

Жыл бұрын

When did he ever played against smaller guys ?

@conradbo1

9 ай бұрын

That is a good way to put it

Changes game had declined by then... I played a challenger with him that same year...

awesome video. the beginning of the federer era and the closing of the chang era. WATCH THE POINT AT 8:56 - 9:06. Insane overhead from the baseline by Fed

The most important question: Why is the Nike sign of the Bandana mirrored?

@DjokovicIsOurLordAndSaviour

4 жыл бұрын

Federer is wearing it wrong lol.

Back when that forehand was fire

@lgeiger

4 жыл бұрын

Pretty sure he still has one of the best forehands in the history of tennis. Even Rafa said he would pick Roger's forehand when he created the perfect player for the channel "Sport360".

@tvtotalforever

4 жыл бұрын

@@lgeiger i don't think its as good anymore. In the last couple of big matches he lost, his forehand was his downfall. He cant bring the pressure consistently anymore and misses too much. I don't know whether its a wrist pace, timing or racket issue - but its gone

Young Federer's speed is nasty

Loved Chang, and though he had a pretty good game for clay....except for perhaps the first 5-6 games Federer was already in GOAT mode (though it would take a few more years to set the standard).

Seen in this match how the variety of Rogers backhand was going to trouble players.

Did the umpire really say "Jeu, Set & Match" when Federer won the first set at 4:32

Beautiful.

great win for Fed here. Chang was an awesome clay court player (French Open Champion). Fed going through him in straight sets spoke LOUDLY

@robertkirya3006

9 ай бұрын

This was the twilight of Chang's career and the emergence of a young Federer.Comparing oranges and apples😂

@j.jmcquade5278

8 ай бұрын

@@robertkirya3006 Chang was still really good, especially on clay.

I did not know they played. I once played two courts down from Chang and Patrick McEnroe during the trans American qualifying rounds in San Jose CA, 1988

@owenclark6487

4 ай бұрын

They were ahead of their time putting on a trans event in 88

Always loved when chang got beat.

I can imagine Nike was furious after this match. Look at the way Fed wore the bandana! Lol.

長髪フェデラーもかっこいい🤟

Chang had repeatedly defeated many great players in his time such as sampras, agassi, lendl, stefan edberg, ivanisevic...etc

@lszujo73

10 ай бұрын

he was a great player....don't remember him winning against either Pete or Agassi though/I might be wrong/

My two cent - Roger is tennis smart. he is always one shot ahead. he constructs a point and makes most of his points as winner instead of opponents unforced error. that's a sign of a great champion. Nadal and Novak are wall and they exhaust opponents with cross court base shot and force opponent to make an error. Federer constructs a point and hit winners. That will be a sad day when he retires, i really don't enjoy watching Nadal, Novak and other top ten.

What round was this?

Federer....grunting?

@DiesDasDaniel

4 жыл бұрын

Rarest sound in Tennis 😂

@brocanova

4 жыл бұрын

He still does

@thanminhhung

4 жыл бұрын

he mostly grunts on clay I think as it's the most physical demanding surface

@vijayendranvijay4538

4 жыл бұрын

@@leonstanic3960 no he does it only during his second serves to put extra kick

@vijayendranvijay4538

4 жыл бұрын

@Shashank hey I am fine dude.. How abt u?? Yes I think 1 slam is enough for me and that he should beat rafa and Novak in back to back matches in Grand slams... He was soooooo close last yr but all our dreams were shattered.. Let's hope for the best atleast next year .. More than Roger winning slams, I am praying for something else.. Hope u get that🤣🤣🤣..

The GOAT-lein:-D

the way Fed retrieved that lob at the end.....

Its so trippy for new fans when they change shirts lmaoo

That point at 8:55 !!!

@aracen74

4 жыл бұрын

Nicotine46 7:33 sliding backhand passing shot

Chang was 80% pusher 20 % counter puncher A pusher is one hander worst nightmare

Is there a highlight of their match in Halle?

I feel like Michael Chang is the Gohan of the tennis world.

I think Chang is a legend. Federer was kind of arrogant in this match and showed Chang little respect at the end. I am a fan of both but tennis has it's moments. In the end it is a game. Many people have advantages with training and money so it gives them an edge.

@duohere3981

Жыл бұрын

Federer IS arrogant. He just got good at acting later in his career.

@bots102

8 ай бұрын

He keeps yelling "come on" at Chang, thats annoying and arrogants AF

Ah, the fiery teenage Federer 😁

Roger 🥰

チャンとフェデラー、現役で対戦があったのを知らなかった。面白かった。

I wonder what would have happened if the two had been in their prime age.

I don't know why people called Chang as shorty where he was 175cm which is not bad at all !

@kampanac

Жыл бұрын

No, he's actually about 171cm, he said he was 5'9 (~175cm) with shoes in an interview.

Head size battle 85vs107 😮

That guy called Federer need a haircut

Clay courts back then were faster than today's fast courts

この頃より進化してるからね〜。

How did you get this good of quality video from 20 years ago? awesome quality.

Nice to seee no ball

New forehand vs old forehand style: Loose wrist (Fed) vs firm wrist (Chang), new forehand wins.

Chang had none of the god given talents and physical attributes of all the other players, but he had asain determination! Vamo....I meant, di di mau!

wait a second! They had net cameras back then??

5:41 underarm serve

@nicolastg3377

4 жыл бұрын

Very relatable. :)

And thus Federer ended the era when a decent athlete with a giant racquet had a chance, and he did it with an obsolete tiny racquet and technique reserved for one in a billion. Only age and continually slowing down all surfaces did was his dominance reigned back. If surfaces hadn’t been slowed and racquets not allowed to become giant easier to use trampolines, he would be nearing 60 majors.

Dude he like slapped the ball with backspin at 9:00 back, that's sick

They is something douchey about young Federer… his look, body language, and attitude see off putting for some reason... Amazing how he transformed into such a class act.

Feds nike logo on headband reversed

9:00

Please upload more videos of Roger on clay(especially in the masters tournaments during 2004-08).

Unfortunately we don't get to see Prime Chang vs Prime Federer. This is better than nothing, but Chang in 1989 could have beaten RF, who knows.

Era tremendamente mal educado y pensar que ahora está convertido en el Gran señor del Tenis😂😂

Back when clay courts were faster.. Now I think monte carlo is the slowest of all courts

@MrPatrickbuit

4 жыл бұрын

Clay courts were never faster, at least not since the 2000s. Stop spreading misinformation like this.

@vijayendranvijay4538

4 жыл бұрын

@@MrPatrickbuit I meant the courts were faster compared to the clay courts we have now atleast since 2009.. Misinformation🤔🤔..I compared only the speed of clay courts.. Yes probably even a person who doesn't watch tennis knows that clay courts are slower compared to hard and grass.. Watch monte carlo 2008 and 2011 matches.. U can find a difference

@suatkayatennis

4 жыл бұрын

The balls are heavier nowdays also

@stuewz

4 жыл бұрын

​@@vijayendranvijay4538 In this case clay is clay, the style of play remains the same even if the speed varies somewhat with atmospheric conditions. I say this often and I will say it again, the difference is the camera they used to film before. It wasn’t HD so everything was more compact and and the field of vision was less wide, which gives the impression that it’s way faster.

@vijayendranvijay4538

4 жыл бұрын

@@stuewz thanks for the explanation.. BTW, I think monte carlo is the slowest of all clay courts.. Recently I watched a match between Roger and rafa 2008 monte carlo which looked faster to my eyes.. Yeah as u say it might be coz of the camera angle

lol Mike Chang where you at

@mikkokarkkainen2807

4 жыл бұрын

He was crushed like a cockroach 🤭

This Federer dude seems like he could win a few grand slams.

@rishimanda2191

4 жыл бұрын

Not with that hair.

@eric_LLM

4 жыл бұрын

You never feel ashamed to copy a joke we have already seen like 1000 times ?

@Nicotine46

4 жыл бұрын

@@rishimanda2191 He did won a few with that hair though

@rishimanda2191

4 жыл бұрын

@@Nicotine46 What are you talking about? He hasn't won a single grand slam in his career.

@Nicotine46

4 жыл бұрын

@@rishimanda2191 I can see the future

❤

Chang's like this guy's pretty good lol This fresh Federer would beat Djokovic? He would attack.

Come on! is such a bush league thing to say and besides Hewitt's trademark phrase.

Chang's mistake is not going with the monk vs the bowl cut...not a gud look.

Back when Roger plays in an almost empty stadium

Where's the replay of chang beating federer on grass????

Michael “chimpy” Chang was my nickname for him when I played tennis as a youth. Our discussions of talking about ATP pros would arise, I’d refer to him as “Chimpy Chang”. Because he’s like a chimpanzee running around the court, full of robust energy

@spjfrat

2 ай бұрын

I played juniors in LA in early 80s. Chang and Pete were known as top players, but I was older. Both had great careers.

Chang was an inspiration to all Chinese people!

@ciprianghenghea7779

4 жыл бұрын

You really can't get that i owned you wolfie.You should stop the obsession dude,that's life ...you met your master 😂😂😂😂😂😂

@ciprianghenghea6008

4 жыл бұрын

@@ciprianghenghea7779 Who is this Wolfie? You should see all the stupid comments I've done recently 😂😂. Calm down squirrel I own you 🐿️🐿️

@ciprianghenghea7779

4 жыл бұрын

@@ciprianghenghea6008 You don't own shit.That's why you'rr obsessed with this troll account but you're not doing anything worth against your master. You got owned from long time ago , just have balls and get over it

@ciprianghenghea6008

4 жыл бұрын

@@ciprianghenghea7779 Squeek squeek squeek little chokosquirrel 😂😂. My comments make more sense anyway LOL!! 😂😂

Federer at 5:00, that's gross ! Get a kleenex, FFS !

Notice Federer's grunting. He dropped that not too long after this. I know this may sound a little out there but this added to the allure of Federer, IMO. His majestic almost mystical game has even more allure without that and adds to why people are so enamored with him. Nadal is really the only beloved tennis player who's grunting doesn't bother fans.

Nobody: Not a single soul: Federer: 0:45

Je trouve que Federer était très arrogant à cette époque

@gevang4538

3 жыл бұрын

Oui même avec Agassi

Poor chang

@gevang4538

3 жыл бұрын

He have money don't worry.

How is it possible that chang is playing Federer and sitting in the crowd at the Same time?

@howdy0000

4 жыл бұрын

That's his brother and coach, Carl

@andrewscott7728

3 жыл бұрын

Glitch

@minboogie

2 жыл бұрын

This is quasi racist 😂 but it's funny as shit.

I said before and I'll say it again,"Weak era my A S S."

@mikeodil7721

4 жыл бұрын

Yan Okimura totally agree. If you add Nalbandian, Roddick, Safin, Davydenko, Agassi, and Hewitt could all easily be considered in the top 10 today. Only Thiem and possibly Medvedev could challenge that roster. As for everyone else today outside the top 4 - no way. What Djok faces today is far less menacing than those early years. Is that his fault? Of course not. But it’s one man’s opinion that today’s game in men’s tennis pales in comparison to years past.

@MrRovoLova

4 жыл бұрын

It's a weak era because Federer played all these aging legends that were already past their peak.

@vijayendranvijay4538

4 жыл бұрын

@@MrRovoLova it's pretty much what Novak is doing right now.. Playing old and past prime players.. This is the norm in any sport.. Try to have some common sense when u put forth an argument

@MrRovoLova

4 жыл бұрын

Vijayendran Vijay nonsense. The only player past his prime is Federer. Nadal is only 1 yr older than djokovic. Everyone else is younger

@mikeodil7721

4 жыл бұрын

nawoo wait a second, guys like Safin, Nalbandian, Hewitt, Roddick and Davydenko we’re aging?? Lol The one guy that was in your category is Agassi and the dude won 8 slams and his physical regimen has been well documented to the point that it’s the standard for today’s players. Heck, I’d almost take guys like Mardy Fish, Ivan Ljubicic, James Blake, Gaudio, and Coria against these players today. Which by the way, where do we put Nadal in this “weak era?” Gustavo Kuerten? I mean, if it’s so weak then why are 2 of these guys STILL in the top 3-4 players in the world? So, I get that it’s the eras as a whole, but I stand by the early to mid 2000s players over today without a doubt. Side note, in their recent building the best tennis player session, Murray and Djokovic said that guys before the 2000s can’t be compared to theirs. Well, I wonder how they’d feel about playing the likes of Borg, Connors, McEnroe, Courier, et al with today’s racquet technology, diet, and trainers everywhere all over the world ready to make you a monster. I’d actually pay to see how they think they’d handle Pete Sampras and that serve in his prime. Nice try boys.

You can call it Unfair but the bottom line is Federer will always be considered the GOAT even if a player like Djoko or Nadal passes him in Titles...Federer simply has that rare "IT" factor that other players dont have...He also has a TOWERING legacy that is unattainable by any other player...This is why he is still 1 of the most endorsed athletes...Dajoko/Nadal can never reach his ICONIC level

@juanestebankruhsanmguel1960

4 жыл бұрын

thats bullshit,lendl was less iconic than mac but he was better than him,you are just a fanboy of federer

@joechrow8341

4 жыл бұрын

​@@juanestebankruhsanmguel1960 You are Missing the Point on Purpose....Point is that Federer not only 1 of the GREATEST and most SKILLED players of all time and has most Major titles of all time but he also is 1 of the most ICONIC players of all time and has that special rare "IT" factor that nobody else has (Even though some other players are famous)...ALL of this are the ingredients that made him the GOAT....

@joechrow8341

4 жыл бұрын

@@juanestebankruhsanmguel1960 Some athletes just have it ALL...Jordan did...Federer does...Some athletes have MANY attributes but they simply never had the WHOLE PACKAGE that Jordan and Federer have

@juanestebankruhsanmguel1960

4 жыл бұрын

​@@joechrow8341 federer doesnt have the complete package,he lacks the clutch gene that pete sampras had for example,sampras would have never lost a wimbledon final having match point.

@joechrow8341

4 жыл бұрын

@@juanestebankruhsanmguel1960 Now that i will agree with...Over last few years he certainly has CHOKED during some BIG matches and moments...This is probably due to the overwhelming expectation pressure he feels now...He has become "Scared" to "Lose" and what he should be doing is concentrating on "Winning" instead....Having said that he has already done enough over his career and everything else i stated is still true...But glad you pointed out the CHOKING cause as a HUGE fan of his i felt that not many Fed fans Pointed this out and been Truthful...His Choking in some Big moments over recent years has been extremely FRUSTRATING to me...Seems to be all about his NERVES...He gets so NERVOUS it looks like those Nerves literally CRIPPLE his body during Volleys

Chang should have retire in 2000 like his compatriot Courier

I am a very strong Djokovic fan but I realize that Federer had to play against Chang, Sampras, Agassi and many other grand slam winners at the beginning of his career. Then he continued to challenge against Nadal, Djokovic. However Nadal and Djokovic didn’t have to deal with the legends which Federer did. Now to me Federer’a 20 grand slams is much more difficult and valuable than Nadal’s or Djokovic’s…

@kingnole4237

Жыл бұрын

Novaxx chokovik

Nice Upload. Rogers forehand looks bit different he had a bigger swing. Chang no Talent at all like hewitt.

@lgeiger

4 жыл бұрын

Pretty impressive how far no talent can bring you.

@klausuberhauser4303

4 жыл бұрын

Chang no talent but 300iq on court.

The Infamous Chang.... he was not a tennis player. He was the shame of the tennis: no honour in his game.

@gevang4538

3 жыл бұрын

He was Roland Garros it's shame.

@2cloudto2o36

3 жыл бұрын

what does that make Lendl then?

@hemil

3 жыл бұрын

@@2cloudto2o36 a professional

@2cloudto2o36

3 жыл бұрын

@@hemil even when he lost to the “non tennis player”?

@hemil

3 жыл бұрын

@@2cloudto2o36 Lendl didnt lose a tennis match. He didnt won a cowardy.

Damn, it's like Chang is incapable of making unforced errors.