Gadamer vs Habermas

Are any conversational norms non-negotiable? @PhiloofAlexandria

Пікірлер: 15

  • @Tm-kt3uw
    @Tm-kt3uw9 ай бұрын

    Thank you for another great video!!!

  • @mileskeller5244
    @mileskeller52449 ай бұрын

    I went to like the video and somehow at some point I accidentally hit the dislike button and didn't realize it. It should be fixed now. Really great insight professor 🙌.

  • @Tm-kt3uw
    @Tm-kt3uw9 ай бұрын

    Do I remember correctly that Gadamer considered understanding of the text to be analogous to reaching understanding in the conversation?

  • @ddyatlov
    @ddyatlov9 ай бұрын

    how many languages do you read Dan? is German required to study philosophy in grad school? or does it depend more on what you focus on in dissertation?

  • @PhiloofAlexandria

    @PhiloofAlexandria

    9 ай бұрын

    Most US philosophy PHD programs now have no foreign language requirement. Pitt did when I was there; my language was Latin. I have some reading knowledge of Greek, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Danish, French, and German, though the last two are rusty; I don’t use them enough.

  • @Raistlin7070
    @Raistlin70709 күн бұрын

    Great video, but you really need to work on getting a microphone. The audio quality is really distracting.

  • @alialrahahleh676
    @alialrahahleh6769 ай бұрын

    When we get a video about objectivism

  • @robertb1138

    @robertb1138

    7 ай бұрын

    Probably never. I've read quite a lot of that material, plus one of Rand's novels, and find them to be less philosophy than political screed. They're certainly not science. It's strange she should try to copy Nietzsche since Nietzsche would almost certainly find her objectivism to be a complete mess.

  • @alialrahahleh676

    @alialrahahleh676

    7 ай бұрын

    @@robertb1138 I don’t think the question was directed to you :) , it still a material that a lot of people consume and we want to learn more on that topic

  • @robertb1138

    @robertb1138

    7 ай бұрын

    Send him a private email, then? Anyway, scholars don't spend a lot of time on things widely seen as unserious and of poor quality, so you will probably not find many willing. It's a career thing. On the other hand, KZread videos are popularizing the subject so maybe someone somewhere is willing to critique Objectivism.

  • @alialrahahleh676

    @alialrahahleh676

    7 ай бұрын

    @@robertb1138 the only poor quality is your opinion, shoving it up in people face, I already emailed and he agreed to debate Yarok Brook, I’m preparing to fund that debate, so chill and keep your opinion to yourself self, I hate the people who think they know every thing themself , get back to the basement my dude

  • @robertb1138

    @robertb1138

    7 ай бұрын

    So you agree with my advice to email. Good. Again, you're on a public forum. So, you know, I guess we're all "shoving" our opinions in people's faces, aren't we? Is it "objectively" true that I live in a basement because you don't like my opinions? Sounds very non-objective. I've read most of what Ayn Rand has written, and I reject it not from a lack of familiarity with it, but from a first hand experience. Good luck with your debate.