I'm mad it doesn't come in champagne gold!!!!

@Shaanmojo

4 жыл бұрын

OMAR GONZALEZ! - star struck.

@braveusang5273

4 жыл бұрын

I'm also mad it doesn't come in oxblood or maroon!!!

@StarshipGhost

4 жыл бұрын

Actually a gold and black version would be sick as hell.

@Bob-Horse

4 жыл бұрын

Hi Omar, I sub to your channel too. 👍

@ogonzilla

4 жыл бұрын

@@Bob-Horse thanks Andrew. Appreciate that!

Biggest complain about Fujifilm from Tony point of view: they dont offer a free trip to Hawaii or New York...

@KoushikBar

4 жыл бұрын

Hit the nail on the head.

@noahkanenwisher4856

4 жыл бұрын

SHIT hahahahhahaha

@shang-hsienyang1284

4 жыл бұрын

You're disgusting

@denault3985

4 жыл бұрын

We haven't seen the Fuji X-T4 first impression videos yet..... ;-)

@ronmeyer519

4 жыл бұрын

@@KoushikBar spot on!

As an X-T2 shooter I'm very excited to pick up an X-T3 for super cheap next month!

@DJ5780

4 жыл бұрын

Me too! We're like vultures

@SolidMGSnake

4 жыл бұрын

What's super cheap? It's been 1,299 for the body for awhile and it'll probably stay that way

@zakazanyphoenix3573

4 жыл бұрын

@@SolidMGSnake bruh 900$ used so if mrsp goes down 1300 to 900-1000$ used will be forced to be much much priced like 600-700$ ball park it happened to xt-2 so i will happen again

@venom5809

4 жыл бұрын

Assuming the XT-4 will be more expensive than the XT-3 giving the upgrades it has, the XT-3’s price probably isn’t going anywhere. 🤷‍♂️

@marcd7332

4 жыл бұрын

Lol I’m excited to get a xt-1, unless getting the xt-2 is worth it? What do you fuji owners think?

"The X-T4 is Fuji's top of the line camera, which is mid-range compared with other manufacturers" *goes on naming cameras with higher resolutions and full frame sensors. I think you might have forgotten the GFX line, specially the GFX100. Is that mid range? How does it compare to other cameras? You want performance, speed and fast autofocus: go with the XT line. You want the highest image quality possible, go for the GFX line.

@The.Urban.Birder

4 жыл бұрын

Or you want both IQ and performance, go for a7riv or a9ii or an r5. Fuji does not exist in a vacuum

@TheFatGandalf

4 жыл бұрын

Mohammed Asadullah Khan are you saying that image quality is not possible from an APSC camera? I think that a lot of people are getting fantastic image quality from 12 megapixel, tiny sensors on smartphones. 35 mm sensors are not all the same and do not a guarantee of image quality.

@johnsg8

4 жыл бұрын

@@The.Urban.Birder Not even close to the IQ from the GFX line.

@The.Urban.Birder

4 жыл бұрын

@@johnsg8 Which has neither the performance nor the lens selection for action photography, which is what Sony offers: acceptable IQ with impeccable AF performance and huge native telephoto lens selection. Do you see how that undermines both the X-T and the GFX lines?

@slater1949

4 жыл бұрын

Mohammed Asadullah Khan blah blah blah don’t buy the damn Fuji then Khan, continue using your Sony’s for sports and we’ll continue using our inferior Fujis🙄😆

My flip screen of Nikon D5500 broke in middle of an event 4 years ago(later fixed by warrenty) .. Then I bought Nikon d750 and then nikon z6 which both has tilt screen. Personally I prefer the tilt screen for photoshoot, it's better and feels more convinient while shooting.. The swivel flip screen is only useful if your take selfie or vlog or over head shot, rest of times tilt screens are better.

@truckerzachbell

4 жыл бұрын

I tend to disagree but only if the manufacturer has thought of such situations and addressed the durability... As both Canon and Olympus have on theirs. Both Tilt and flip screens both work very well in my use case. And as an arena shooter, I find I can get both low and high angles with these screens that would otherwise result in me climbing fences or crouching down.

I am not a pro so I try to not fall for the new technology too often. At the moment, I am very happy with my X-T2 and 3 F2 WR lenses, and my Pentax K-1. The X-T2 screen if perfect for me when shooting church events and family parties. I don't film myself, I don't do much video and I don't vlog. The K-1, despite what people think about it's AF and FPS, still produces high image quality. I leave it to those blessed with more money than I get the latest and fastest toys.

Thanks for the preview. And for me is the other way around. No flip screen = no way. The flexibility it provides is priceless.

You are wrong with the tilt screen vs full articulated. Both have advantages and inconveniences but for a street photographer/videographer that wants to be low profile the tilting screen is 1000 times better. No point to argue on that. After having tried both systems for years with Panasonic I can tell you that once you flip out the articulating screen your discretion is gone. Experienced it hundreds of times . The Gx7 was sweet for that while the GX8 and GH5 are horrible if you want to take candids. Now if you are not into this kind of photography/video the articulating is great.

Well done Fuji, really fantastic upgrades! I will say I love the flip up down and out screen of my XT100. I think this style screen would have divided opinion less. However, I do appreciate the Canon/Pany style flip screen can fold back on itself to protect the screen which is a big plus.

The short conclusion of this video: X-T4 is not good enough because with APS-C camera without some f1.8 zoom lenses you can't get your background Tony enough

Thinking of keeping our XT3 after getting XT4 as a second to keep the compact folding screen for photo work (and it's lighter.)

Hey Tony, you left one of the biggest advantages of the XT4 vs the full frame cameras out of the comparison : The price of the lenses. You only compared the body prices. Canon RF 70-200 = $2700 Sony 70-200 G Master = $2600 Fuji 50-140 = $1700, canon rf 85mm f/1.2l usm = $2700 FUJIFILM XF 56mm f/1.2 R = $1000 the full frame lens is bigger and costs $1700 more. Besides Sony, the other full frame cameras do not have a lot of good small lenses. Fuji sure has few big lenses but they have good and pro quality lenses that are small.

@greysuit17

4 жыл бұрын

Compare crop lenses to crop lenses, Fuji is $$$. Fuji lenses are just as expensive as full frame glass. Six of Fuji lenses are just as expensive as Zeiss Batis or Gmaster lenses. Fuji lenses aren’t cheap especially if you compare it to other crop lenses.

@TechnoBabble

4 жыл бұрын

But those lenses are not giving you the same results, therefore, not the same lenses. Those more expensive lenses combined with full frame cameras are going to give you less noise, more DR, and more background blur with the option of stopping down and getting identical results to a Fuji. The Canon RF 85mm can also resolve upwards of 50mp.

@TheVitalishe

4 жыл бұрын

Nikon's equivalent to Fuji 50-140 f/2.8 would be 70-200 f/4 and new it is $1,400. So $300 cheaper. Nikon's equivalent to Fuji 56 f/1.2 is 85 1.8 S, which is $800. So another $200 cheaper. And there is an excellent 85 1.8G which used goes around $300. So price advantage of Fuji lenses is a myth because one needs to understand which lenses are equivalent. The advantage of Fuji lenses in availability of some small f/2 primes like 23mm f/2. Nikon does not yet have anything similar in size.

@bigfoxki

4 жыл бұрын

Don't forget aperture is also cropped in crop system, so Fuji 50-140 f/2.8 is more like 75-210 f4.5? Don't get me wrong, I want to get into Fuji system too(love that film simulation and the dials), but Fuji 100-400 is hard to beat against Sony 200-600.

@mexicodirk

4 жыл бұрын

and the prices are with discount not release prices 🤦🏽‍♂️

For mine, the best part is the driving down of the prices of the older models. Just stepped up to the XT-2 for a reasonable cost - really sensational stills IQ.

people have strange problems on those internetz...

@smashexentertainment676

4 жыл бұрын

typical 1st world problems)

The only concern I have with a flip screen is an L bracket getting in the way. Of course I imagine as more and more manufacturers start implementing flip screens on their cameras L bracket designs will also evolve to accommodate them.

@unbroken1010

4 жыл бұрын

Then stop being lazy you want everything done for you. This is the craft of photography at your fingertips you can go on Amazon buy bunch of parts and build your own bracket adapter

@gregrobsn

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly. Oooh... all the video bloggers out there need a flippy screen. Screw everyone else.

I'm glad you cleared up the dots vs. pixels. In a previous video I questioned your math on the pixels, but I didn't realize they were counting each individual sub-pixel as a "dot", and not counting pixels as dots.

flip screen does impact negatively for waist level shooting. The screen is to the side not inline with the lens. That is why some people prefer tilt screen over flip screen.

@neurocirurgiaobh

2 жыл бұрын

Flip screen is all some only for web camera use or vlog, in pro use tilt was more useful, in video especially

I love how you say the XT4 is almost the same price as the EOS R which is full frame... and then 5 minutes later you throw EOS R in the ocean because it's no good XD. I'm not a pro nor need it so I won't be getting it, but I'm getting that new X100V on Thursday! Super stoke about it!

@zinokoji3763

4 жыл бұрын

I got one too, the first package one ! XD are you getting the same ?

@zeissiez

4 жыл бұрын

The X100V is Fuji’s truest X camera. XT4 is like giving what most people want in a camera.

@akirafan28

4 жыл бұрын

@@zeissiez Huh? Are you saying that the Fuji spirit resides more in the X100V compared to X-T4, because X-T4 is just a product made to please people, whereas the X100V is the camera Fuji really just want to make?

@neneodonkor

4 жыл бұрын

@@akirafan28 I don't even understand his argument. The reason why companies make different versions of the same product is satisfy the various needs of their diverse customer base. The type of photographer who picks the X100v might not go for the xt4 which is targeted at hybrid shooters. So one product you like does not make the other less valuable.

Don't get your reasoning on iPhone simply having more dots there for better. It has a much, much larger screen. Should calculate the DPI for a fair comparison

@mytravellinfo

4 жыл бұрын

EXACTLY

@PhilipWalker

4 жыл бұрын

Assuming the xt-4's screen is similar in physical size to the xt-3: The iphone 11 pro max (10m dots) has a DPI of about 458 ppi. The Fujifilm xt-4 (1.6m dots) has a DPI of about 360 ppi. IPHONE: 2688x1242 resolution with 6.5" diagonal XT-4 GUESSTIMATE: 900x600 resolution with 3" diagonal

@nilssab

4 жыл бұрын

I mean though, the iPhone screen is not more than 6 times bigger.. so kind of obvious that it wins in DPI as well. Also, size was a part of his argument, pictures would look better on the camera if the screen was bigger even with the same DPI.. a critique directed at all camera makers.

Love the flip screen!! It’s what i have used for years in my Canon. It’s amazing to use for photos, vlogs, everything - especially when you shoot above a crowd or want an ariel style shot.

Fuji XH1 is definitely Not “plasticky”...I do agree that it’s bulky. Can’t wait to see how this magnetic ibis will compare.

I have cameras with both kinds of screens and I find myself rarely pulling them out of place so either will work for me.

Tony, thanks for this review. I want to say that I’ve been shooting since the mid 50’s, having gone through endless camera systems along the way. I chose Fugifilm at this stage of my life for the lightness. Your argument for other full-frame cameras caused me to reflect on whether I made a mistake and in that, for my needs, haven’t. I’m not a professional but I can say I am at the personal end of the spectrum as to why I’m still shooting photos, essentially for my pleasure, not for financial reasons. So the smaller sensor works very well. If I was shooting professionally, I would have to go with the full frame for reasons you mentioned. For pleasure, I love the fugi system for its results, light weight and regarding lenses, smaller, at least to date.

"...upcoming R5 will blow everyone else away..." What happened to "Marketing BS"? ... :-)

@peterferry1646

4 жыл бұрын

Yes if you got 5000$ to spend

@denault3985

4 жыл бұрын

Remember, Canon always cripples their FF's...they still have to sell $50,000 4k Cinema cameras.

@Mainwong

4 жыл бұрын

denault3985 which canon camera is 50k? 😂 c700 FF is 33k c500II is 16k

@jigjitsu5599

4 жыл бұрын

Lmao

@DarkPa1adin

4 жыл бұрын

@Dan C not just edit. How are they screening 8k at 100%?

I hate "flippy" screens. They snag cables, clash with or don't work at all with L brackets, confuse my perspective. Funny how we've had options in so many things we buy... but when it comes to cameras we're stuck with one or the other. I would NOT buy this one.

@kbarrett1844

4 жыл бұрын

Derek Midgley - I won’t be surprised if it sells better than the X-T3

A flippy screen is the reason I'm finally getting this camera.

15:40 I'll have to correct you a little there Mr. Northrup. While Fuji do have limits in terms of resolution, and magepixel count on an APS-C, but Fuji does have the option Medium Format cameras.

Ironically, the flip screen is what has convinced me to save up my money to get the X-T4, instead of the X-T3, lol!

@mavieskizz

4 жыл бұрын

because you are not photographer, are you? Good news for you vloggers of course. Fuji betrayed photographers :(

@BeckyTregear

4 жыл бұрын

@@mavieskizz I was a photographer for many years, shooting with Nikon DSLR and "the trinity", but damn they got heavy! For pure photography purposes I'd still choose DSLR with a non-digital viewfinder, but now I am at a stage in life where I want to have lighter, more portable gear for casual travel photography, and yes, for videography as well, which is why I am looking at Fujifilm and also maybe Olympus. I've used Nikon for a long time, and I loved my D800, which was the best camera I've ever owned. But I felt like I needed a change, so I decided to sell it with two of my lenses, and only a few short weeks later we went into lockdown and now all plans for buying new camera gear are completely on hold, since it's not like we can travel anywhere anyway, lol! What a nightmare.

@mavieskizz

4 жыл бұрын

@@BeckyTregear Technology has advanced a lot. The age of DSLR is closing and there are many advantages in its electronic displays. xt-4 is a perfect machine for you with its flip screen if you are going to shoot vlogs. I am interested in street photography and rarely shoot videos. Scenes on the street change fast. You need to take a quick frame without noticing the right angle on street. The flip screen in this scenario is cumbersome and unusable. But tilt screen is perfect.

What you forget is that xt line up is adored by street photographers, having it flip out to the side draws attention. I hate the screen on the EOSr , it draws attention. I can use my mobile phone with wifi if I need a self portrait

one drawback of the flip-out screen is that it is much harder to use a L-bracket on such a body. L-brackets that are compatible with flip-out screens do exist, but they tend to be bigger and bulkier. while mounted vertically on a tripod, the flip-out screen also might not have the range of motion available to work.

Thanks for an interesting video Tony, I’m trying to resist the upgrade from my XT-3 but there’s nothing like a shiny new toy to play with. Talking of shiny, can you lose the annoying light reflections off the main screen? Keep up the great work.

I personally like x-t3 screen design or other screens that don't swing out on the side. I couldn't tell you exactly why but I just don't like the screen swinging out to the side

Lmaooo Tony what was that blonde voice over??? 🤣🤣🤣

The XT4 is not Fuji’s top end camera, that would be the GFX 100. Comparing the XT line to full frame dosnt make sense to me. They serve different purposes and different people. It’s like comparing apples to jalapeños, they are both fruit but have very very different characteristics lmao.

@dr.nariata6924

4 жыл бұрын

Cesar Vargas good point!

I can already use the Fuji app to frame and trigger selfie shots with the X-T3. (Not in the market for the X-T4 anyways, but might be a buyer for a future X-T5 which might have the same screen.)

Would love one of these... Great Video thanks.

when is spock going to send evil tony back to the mirror dimension?

When the screen is flipped out, it makes it a lot harder to position the AF point by touching the LCD, which is the fastest way to move your AF point. First, you have to move your right hand away from the grip to the left, after AF point positioning, you have to move your right hand back to the grip. With a tilt screen, you can touch the LCD to position AF point in no time with the right hand holding the grip. The LCD of Lumix S1H and Sony A-mount A99ii can make everyone happy though. You can use it both like a tilt screen and flip screen. If I have to live with a flip-out screen, I'm gonna dream about the Smart Controller AF-ON button on the Canon 1dx mkIII, which makes AF point positioning as efficient as touching the LCD.

@unbroken1010

4 жыл бұрын

Why are you so depending on autofocus this is the craft of photography. And those times you should have no problem dealing with manual focus

Im kinda excited im not writing off the xt4 but then im still rocking my xt1 and have no complaints

Great flip screen usage senarios you mentioned !👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

10:18. Not sure I follow your logic here. "I love it, so you will too." Nah. Haha. People have different preferences. I've used a fully articulating screen many times for photography and absolutely hate the usability of it. Is it handy for making my KZread videos? You bet. For my real estate work, wedding work and photography in general, the tilting screen of my X-T2 is much more enjoyable. If they had implemented a design similar to the X-T100 or S1H, I think it would have satisfied both camps.

@stephenscharf6293

4 жыл бұрын

I shoot real estate also, and fully agree about the 3-way tilting LCD. Its also better when I shots of racing car drivers sitting in the cockpits of formula cars (e.g., Indy Cars) from holding the camera directly overhead with the LCD tilted out from the top.

@KentuckyMan30

4 жыл бұрын

@@stephenscharf6293 Hey, Stephan! Can't speak to shooting racing, but I utilize the tilt screen on every real estate shoot. I love it! The flippy screen would be annoying for that application (for me, at least).

@stephenscharf6293

4 жыл бұрын

@@KentuckyMan30 Hi KentuckyMan30! I agree fully; the flippy screen would be, in a single acronym, a PITA for RE/Arch photography. Not only would be a hassle fiddling with it, but it would be a time-suck as well. BTW, I know your YT channel and enjoy your content.

What?? No built in tripod...this is bullsh@t...I’m mad!!🤣😂🤣

A nice summary of the features and comparison to other cameras/systems.

The flip screen is one thing i miss on 7d ii from my t5i Appreciate tonys insight and reviews In ref to grip, that was pri reason i went with canon over nikon

You're missing a big point. Many users (or maybe most of them) from Fujirumor were asking for the S1H or XT100 screen, which allows you to tilt AND flip the screen. It's the best of both worlds and that's why so many users are upset that we get this flippy screen instead.

@KentuckyMan30

4 жыл бұрын

Nate Kong Thank you! I’ve been saying this very thing for a while now. To me, the obvious solution is to implement something like on the X-T100. Sadly, the X-T4 will never be in my future as the traditional style of fully articulating screen is terrible for what I do.

Crazy glare/reflection off the big screen in your new set. Need to adjust the lighting ... New set-up looks sharp otherwise.

Oh, I'm already excited for the giveaway!!! You guys are the best!

Helpful review. I like the Fuji dial controls - faster more comfortable etc. but am still Canon, so ...

After this video, I think I can use my Xt-3 five more years.

Flippy screen makes sense. Sometimes when conducting an interview in a small room, the camera is up against the wall and it is not possible to stand behind it to see the screen👍

@chrisogrady28

4 жыл бұрын

Very familiar with this exact problem. Flattening the tripod legs to squeeze out every last mm of space

@GoneToHelenBach

4 жыл бұрын

That's what hot-shoe mounted displays are for.

@DarrinHowells

4 жыл бұрын

@@GoneToHelenBach Yea, cause that's what I want to do, spend more money.

@breadkrumbs

4 жыл бұрын

Happens to me at work all the time!

@GoneToHelenBach

4 жыл бұрын

@@DarrinHowells I bought a used hot-shoe mount monitor on Ebay for £18.00 So you don't want to spend more money but you presumably participate in photography, which is inherently expensive, and you're watching a video about a new camera. 🙄

Great vid. Love the flippy screen!

Most importantly, did they change to mini-HDMI from the hot-garbo micro-HDMI output out on the XT3?

The flippy screen ist for videographers the tilty screen for photographers. They should release separate cameras

@aymaansumandi7743

4 жыл бұрын

Then people would complain about Fuji having too many product lines and dividing the consumer base.

@hailynewma9122

4 жыл бұрын

Aymaan Sumandi The „consumer base“ IS diverse, it is photographers and videogs. They have different needs

@aymaansumandi7743

4 жыл бұрын

@@hailynewma9122 I'm not disagreeing with you; I'm just saying that other manufacturers who have done just that have been criticized for encouraging market segmentation. So it's kind of a damned if you do damned if you don't. My 2 cents, at least.

@waynosfotos

4 жыл бұрын

What a load of rubbish, you just tilt them now you want to use them.

“It just so happens that my shoulders are wider than the camera” 😂😂😂

Fully articulated screens are excellent. Ideal for low angle / level portraits and protecting the screen in transit. As well as vlogging.

Can you do a full review?? Any lens recomendations?

Maybe I’ll upgrade from XT1 to XT 3 now

Also he claims APSC has no size advantage over FF but ignores the fact that lenses for APSC are smaller and lighter.

@TechnoBabble

4 жыл бұрын

But they're not. They are smaller and lighter when they give you equivalently worse results. You can't cheat physics. Look at the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 compared to a 24-70mm f/2.8 on full frame. Both give similar results for different sensor sizes and they're about the same sizes.

@emptystring6833

4 жыл бұрын

@@TechnoBabble First of all: Yeah that's absolutely true. If you make a lens smaller you'll have to sacrifice maximum (equivalent) aperture for rquivalent focal lengths. So a lot of APS-C or even more so MFT lenses will be physically smaller, but also slower. However quite a few people are fine sacrificing aperture for a more compact lens design. And in here comes another factor: optical quality. More compact/slower lens designs on Full Frame often tend to be cheaper lenses with worse optical quality (chromatic abberration, distortion, flaring, ...). So if what you actually want is a more compact set of lenses with high optical quality you propably want an APS-C system, as for full frame you would be limited to lower-end lens options from most manufacturers. Then again there will also be a lot of people who disagree with that and want larger, faster lenses, which is just as valid. So as always it depends on the individual. For some people an APS-C system will actually yield a size advantage when keeping in mind which type of lenses they might want. That's my opinion on the matter anyways.

@TechnoBabble

4 жыл бұрын

@@emptystring6833 you're entire retort was based on what a person might prefer. Nobody was talking about anything subjective. He said that APS-C has a size advantage, I told him that that was only true because you sacrifice image quality. There are also plenty of VERY good and not insanely expensive full frame lenses that already exist that can be adapted as well as lenses that are simply much higher end than anything for APS-C.

@richardmardex3014

4 жыл бұрын

@@emptystring6833 You nailed it with your comment. And for the reasons you gave, the Fuji X series is significantly lighter than full frame.

the x-t3 screen has the screen angles i need already without taking it out and I can just 'bop' it back in place when I'm done. there's no need to extend my camera nearly 2x the width on the xt4 just to tilt the screen, then flipping it back to fold into its place. shoulders are wider than screen and camera, but i don't shoot from my chest.

Thanks for covering the Fuji XT-3, Tony and Chelsea. I eagerly await your AF tests as that is the claim I'm most curious about. Also, Tony is right about better screens on all cameras being needed and better connectivity being needed, too!

People complaining about the flip screen... “we don’t want more functionality or versatility” ... 🤦🏻‍♂️

@youuuuuuuuuuutube

4 жыл бұрын

You're actually losing some of that functionality. However, I know that Fuji had designed a screen that could tilt and flip, I wish they had used this technology on the XT-4.

@RiseUpToYourAbility

4 жыл бұрын

@SwitchRich yeh but you can frame yourself without having to buy an external monitor which seems like a massive advantage. You can still use the screen without flipping it out and have your centralized screen

@danzbeard

4 жыл бұрын

ShaneYetti hahahaha

Wow, I’m super tempted to invest in Fuji now, all depends if Z mount gets a dual cards and flip screen camera soon

I can't wait for the hands-on follow up to this

Mmm I want to make something whit this x-t4.. So much inspiration.

I think they should have the flip screen on XH lines and not on XT

@falkensmaize

4 жыл бұрын

SeanKimStyle The XH line is probably dead. Nobody bought the first one.

@SeanKimStyle

4 жыл бұрын

@@falkensmaize it sold out at lower price point. They will be releasing xh2 in 2021

So I have the possibility of winning an X-t4..hurray!

Does it have enough bokeh?

Wait a minute. When did my S1H get 45MP? Tony, did Panasonic give you a S1H with the S1R sensor? The Panasonic S1HR Tony F0.95 Edition. Please share!

i have a X-T3 and want IBIS ))

17:30 no headphone jack in the body, but one can use a usb-c adapter

May I suggest checking the reflection of your lights on your monitor before recording next time?

I am a fuji user, and i own 3 fuji lense. I think this is a great video. I love all the facts and comparison, it makes me understand where i stand, whether i should invest even more into fuji, etc, because i always want to improve, and knowing all the options and limitation is great.

Oh man Tony, I know you are a sony-man, so I was surprised that the first part of your video was rather objectively , but the rest of it is disapointing sony biased again .Why do you call the XT4 a midrange camera? There is no doubt that it is the very top-end APS-C camera in the market today, blowing away the rest of the competitors in every single aspect!! And with this specs it is also competing with the most of the top end FF cameras out there, including sony. If the XT4 was a FF camera with the same specs otherwise, I am sure that it would also blow a away many of the FF mirrorless cameras out there, also in regard to ergonomics and handling, built quality, color science, EVFs and touch screens, menu Systems, etc. So you find the Fujifilm XH1 feeling plasticly-yreally? I had a Sony A9 for a few months, and this was feeling really plasticly compared with the amazingly well built XH1!! Even the EVF and the touch screen were superior to the highly prized Sony A9. Furthermore, you complain about the size and the relatively low resolution of the LCD-screen? May I ask you about the specs of the LCD-screens of top-end Sony FF-bodies like the A7rIV or the A9II? They have the exactly the same size(3"), but even lower resolution!!! (1.440.00 Sony vs. 1.620.00 Fuji). And the screen of the XT4 is fully articulating!-a feature many V-Loggers have asked for, and not in the first line for making selfies!! So which camera has the better LCD screens? The 'midrange' Fuji for 1700 bugs or the top-end Sonys for over 4000 bugs? And the price will drop also. In my opinion, the Fujifilm XT4 is in no way a midrange camera exept for its price!! It is superior in many aspects to many of the mirriorless stuff out there. Of course it has some limitations compared to FF cameras, but they are not as big as many people think!!

@saltiga05

4 жыл бұрын

@@jaegerschtulmann Dumb comment, Off to bed kiddo,school day tomorrow.

@blubravery

4 жыл бұрын

Fuji considers their top end the X-Pro so yeah the XT is mid range

@TonyAndChelsea

4 жыл бұрын

It's objectively a mid-range camera based on the price and sensor. There's really nothing to take personal about it. I have no relationship or attachment to Sony... this was filmed on a Canon. As I stated, I love the X-T3 and I've already ordered an X-T4 for my own use. And yes, we've complained about the TERRIBLE rear screen on the Sony's: kzread.info/dash/bejne/k65109KGcdnNfto.html

@kraft1954

4 жыл бұрын

@@TonyAndChelsea 4K 60p with crop 1.18 or without crop for full frame?

@sirbc

4 жыл бұрын

The 3+ year old Sony a6300 has a full stop more dynamic range at base iso, where landscape photographers make their bread and butter, than the XT-3, which has the same sensor as the XT-4. Can't believe they are releasing a camera in 2020 with a base iso of 160.

This camera is so tempting BUT I'm still a Sony guy right now. Thanks for your thoughts.

Use Sony professionally but looking to buy the X-T4 as a travel/everyday camera - especially appreciate the flip out screen.

I believe Gordon said they moved the headphone jack to the battery grip but you can use the usb on the body for headphones also. Thanks for all the specs and comparison.

14:48 correction it's not the S1H it's the S1R

As an xt2/xh1 owner and photographing 99% of the time, I see nothing here worth the upgrade and a few things against an upgrade (though I'm happy for Fuji technical success).

I have a XT3 and a bunch of lenses and I just couldn’t be happier with it, but you are absolutely right about its limitations. I wish Fuji would do a f1.8 zoom, of Sigma can do it for several mounts, how couldn’t they?

I currently have a Nikon d7100, which has an APS-C sensor. One reason I want to upgrade/change is that the noise performance is not that good after ISO 400 and other features like color science and IBIS I feel somehow limited with my old camera. One concern I have with the XT3 and XT4 (both have the same sensor) is noise performance and dynamic range, DR seems to be even lower compared to D7100, and because XT3/XT4 has more pixels in the same sensor area (24MP vs 26MP) it means the pixel is smaller and more susceptible to noise. I have heard some criticism with XT3 noise performance and in the XT4 announcements, I do not see any upgrade in the sensor or processor... I guess I will have to wait some months for other camera releases and future reviews of XT4 to see if they improved the manufacturing process or the noise performance by firmware...

You can’t promise we will love it for street photography, since that’s based on the fallacy that your taste is everyone else’s. Everyone is different. I have tilt and fully articulated screen cameras, and I always use the tilt screen camera for street photography since the subject never sees the screen. When I use a fully articulate screen, the subject often notices and stops the behaviour I’m trying to photograph. Oh, and I broke a GH5 screen at the hinge 5 weeks after it was released. Again, I’m glad you haven’t had it happen to you, but your experience isn’t everyone’s

All of the other KZread reviewers: X-T4 First Impressions! Tony : X-T4 People are MAD (Hate in Thumbnail) *SONY FANBOI TRIGGERED*

@deathrat

3 жыл бұрын

What

Everything they added to this version of the xt3 is perfection. Picking up my x100v today and looking forward to the xt4 and my 90mm f2 combo.

I want to know where they moved the spot meter before I pre order. As I use a spot meter quite a bit, and don't want to carry my Pentax digital spot around when I am traveling with my light Fuji X camera system. Mind you I don't mind it for my medium and large format work as they are heaver systems and I plan for bringing the meter along when shooting those. Other than that, this new camera is a win for me to upgrade from my XT-2 as I already have a fairly extensive Fuji X lens suite.

I do own both myself, flip and tilt, and tilt makes your setup SO much more discrete. Articulate/flip automatically grows your footprint significantly, and if you're a low angle shooter, like parents, shooting from hip level is quite common, and a minor tilt does not grow your footprint at all.... that said, parents can use the flippy for family portraits, it's somewhat helpful but by the time you back away from the camera.... not really. If you cant figure out the advantages of a tilt screen, you probably havent used it enough. Removing/Packing the camera bag, you dont even need to close the tilt screen all the way, good luck leaving your articulating screen open and stuffing it in your bag. There are obviously advantages of both systems, Canon literally makes both types of screens, fuji makes both types, not everyone is a youtuber, and dealing with an articulating screen all day long can get finnicky.

is it unfair to say the canon RP is cheaper at 950$ when on release it was 1299$? and only after time and people unwilling to buy the camera that canon had to update it and lower the price to be something more appealing? though its still unfair comparison to see the 70-200 canon since its the smallest of it's kind when the nikon/sonys are going to be bigger- then again that canon 70-200 gets longer when zoomed in and might looks as smaller as shown in the video. or its wider because its full frame, or heavier??

@armandot9137

4 жыл бұрын

it is unfair but it is the a competition as we speak. Unfair, but pragmatic.

@JayGrapherTh

4 жыл бұрын

​@@armandot9137 i can agree to that canon is about to surpass many brands to be on top. funny he talks about fuji haters but I dont want to come off as someone like that :( but still wanna/gotta point out how some , not all, of the commentary is a bit bias, or wondering maybe its not as bias as i think it is. another comment would be lens cost - full frame lens inherently are going to cost more. and seeing canon cheaper alternatives are just lens that I wouldnt want to use. but that prime 35mm with Optical lens stabilization is something im very fascinated with.

@smaakjeks

4 жыл бұрын

@@JayGrapherTh The fact that you are asking instead of claiming, and also pondering your own bias, puts you head and shoulders above brand fanboys.

@smaakjeks

4 жыл бұрын

@@JayGrapherTh Anyway: For equivalent results, full frame lenses are cheaper, generally. Lens manufacturers charge more for equivalent lenses in crop format. In terms of weight and size, it's pretty similar across formats, because it's a matter of optics. You need a large opening to let in extra light. What I mean by that is that a 24-70mm f2.8 lens for full frame will be similar in size as a 36-105mm f1.2 lens theoretically would be in 1.5x format.

@JayGrapherTh

4 жыл бұрын

​@@smaakjeks hmm its not extra light, its just depth of field and "blurry" back ground that's the main difference. not how much light. another example totally wrong is the "speed booster" cause you are not simulating full frame light in a APSC. you are simply squeezing more light in to a smaller area (sensor) and thats how you get more light with speed booster. NOT that full frame gets more light. like a magnifying glass that focus light in to one spot. i think you mixed the focal length cause in full frame lens is 24-70 2.8 while apsc is 18-55 f2.8 & thats how its always been made. -in any case, better just have these lens have the T.stops as well to give proper information about how much light you are getting. haha

Thank you so much for accurately portraying the differeneces between APS-C and FF. I wish i had had a firm grasp of sensor size before I decided to buy a Panasonic GH5 a couple years back, before having to sell my entire kit and settle for a Sony A7ii instead of the A7iii I could have bought had I not gone with a MFT mount first. You live and you learn though!

@haydennettleton3272

4 жыл бұрын

Why did you have to sell your MFT? in most situations i doubt you could tell the difference between MFT and full frame. Only if you shoot at high iso or want super shallow DOF do you need Full frame and maybe if you print mural sized photos..

When I Astrophotography and the camera is pointing straight up to caught a nebula or star cluster the flippy screen is a must. Its also good when doing wildlife to flip it in to stop it getting scratched while rolling around in the brush.

@spike--

4 жыл бұрын

Tilt is better on a tripod.

17:15 X-T4 shouldn't it be 1700?

All good reasons, but for me flippy screen is no good and dealbreaker. For the way i shoot i need a tilting screen only

@phildoodler2199

4 жыл бұрын

It still tilts - but to the side.

@armandot9137

4 жыл бұрын

@@phildoodler2199 that is the problem: it it tilts to the side. It just does not work for me.

@spike--

4 жыл бұрын

@@armandot9137 there shit! Try manual focusing on a tripod when its 8 inches above the ground.

@armandot9137

4 жыл бұрын

@@spike-- for my style of shooting tilting is a must, articulating gets in the way. I understand others have other needs.

@spike--

4 жыл бұрын

@@armandot9137 im sorry. Tilt good.flippy bad. I shoot alot of low level. My bad.🍻

Forget Selfie use for the flip-screen. I have used my camera on a monopod (Canon T5i) and used the flip screen to allow me to see salmon jumping up stream, from the articulated screen. Comes in REAL handy. Also, when shooting over hedges and walls (again on a monopod), I can angle the screen downward, so I can see shots over the barriers...

I use an A73 for video but it doesn’t have 4K60 and the eye AF does not work in video. It looks like the flip screen will be a big problem when you plug in an HDMI & USB-C cables. It doesn’t look like you can filter the screen up or down because it will hit the cables. a cage (with a handle on the left side) doesn’t look like it will work either

People will always look for a way to find fault in something, it's like they feed off it. It just shows that in the end, you can't please everyone. I'm definitely getting this day one though.

@listonheinz9103

4 жыл бұрын

Brave Usang 🎵All I want is the perfect cameraah🎵

@braveusang5273

4 жыл бұрын

@@listonheinz9103 That's the thing..there's no such thing as the perfect camera lol

S1h screen is the best of both worlds - flip + tilt (2-way)

@iforgotmyusername0

4 жыл бұрын

Panasonic FTW

Need to know how well the AF works.

I had a Canon G2(?) Like in the early 2000 and thought that flippy screen was the best thing on Earth. Then I used the XT3 screen and thought that was the greatest implementation shy of a front facing utility. I believe it is possible to combine both into one design and would be great to see it on any of the Fuji cameras.

No wonder people have everything in US. The prices are just through the floor.

The XT-4 is looking good, real good. 👍

I love my Fuji cameras, crop sensor and all. And I think the Xt4 will be a great camera to add to the collection. I even have plans to invest into the GFX system for certain other portraits that I shoot. I keep my xt1 in a bag for my motorcycle, or in my car. My xt3 is always ready to go wherever I go we well. The Xt4 will be my push to add video into my shoots. Nice video, Tony. Waiting on your live critiques to come back.

Sounds fantastic. Wish it was full frame. Thanks Tony!