Passed on the 100II due to the price, but the 100s II is very tempting! Thanks for the comparison video

@cris_photography

Ай бұрын

I agree! The things they removed aren’t that important to me - however the price is! Take care

I preordered the 100S II (using the GFX50S and 50R Sinne 2019). I also shoot Weddings and couples and i m looking forward to the new AF capabilities. The 55 1.7 is a very slow lens with the old system. But the 110 is fast.

@cris_photography

Ай бұрын

Nice!

hello thanks for clarifications - does it also de squeeze anamorphic lens like the GFX 100 11 ?

@cris_photography

Ай бұрын

It should yes

Nice comparison review! I think this 100S II is a decent mid-level revision of the 100S; but it also falls short of the 100II in more ways than you mention . . . the lack of a (optional) vertical grip makes ergonomics for vertical shooting a pain, especially on a long shoot . . . SD cards, though more affordable, write/read painfully-slowly unless you spend a lot more $$$ for premium cards . . . the hand grip itself is deeper than the 50, but still small and uncomfortable for large hands and longer shooting sessions, as compared to the 100II (sans vertical grip). . . For basically the same IQ as the 100II, it's a great value - you won't get "$2.5K more IQ" out of the 100II -- but Fuji still really need to work on their ergo's for professional studio/location shooters . . . or just offer more functional vertical grip options on ALL models. I'd love to see a new GFX model that forego's the video capabilities; just strip it away, and give us a powerhouse photo-centric camera with IQ, speed, photo features, and ergo's - please Fuji, pretty please?!

@cris_photography

21 күн бұрын

Good points 😉 thanks for sharing!

Does it have same sensor as at 100 ii .....I currently have the 50s ii and really love it but want to upgrade the auto focussing the 100 ii is way too much in Australia

@scotttucker9613

Ай бұрын

Same AF performance as the 100 II. Very slightly different sensor in regards to read out speed it seems. IQ should be identical.

@platofong8264

Ай бұрын

@@scotttucker9613 definitely not the same for AF speed between two cameras. Noticeable better for 100ii if you shoot moving objects.

@cris_photography

Ай бұрын

Exactly, 2 things: slower readout speed and AF tracking. But like I said in another comment, it doesn't bother me enough to mention it (having tried both). Cheers!

How are you getting on with the new T+S lenses? I find them complex compared to others and the lack of a foot on the 110mm compared to the 30mm a little hard to bear with?

@cris_photography

Ай бұрын

I don’t use them much other than for specific RE shots where I need the close distance. But otherwise I find other lenses much easier and simple to use as well (like all TS lenses I’ve used in the past)

@nelsonclub7722

Ай бұрын

@@cris_photography Which s pretty much where I am with them!!

I held the two for 30 min the other day. Def differences, the viewfinder is a teensy bit clearer but smoother. All around def looks nicer although the Sii looks great as well. The 100ii has an awesome textured dark grey finish on the metal compared to a semigloss cheaper looking black on the Sii. The viewfinder doesn’t come off the Sii which sucks if you’re using it with an ext monitor for whatever reason. The Sii def feels lighter in hand with a lens and that seems like the perfect weight (Im 6’3” and have big hands even and the 100ii feels big). as far as $2500 price difference I dunno I think that’s a big spread just for 8k 30fps.

@cris_photography

Ай бұрын

Thanks for the additional feedback and info!

Is there any real difference between the II's HS sensor versus the SII's? Just one FPS or genuinely slower readout?

@tombube49

Ай бұрын

Slower readout, but just a bit. I think it was mentioned at petapixel or fstoppers

@platofong8264

Ай бұрын

autofocus speed is really quite a bit better for 100 ii especially for tracking. I have tested both two cameras extensively in China for more than a week.

@cris_photography

Ай бұрын

Thanks Marc, both tom and platofong 8264 are correct in their answers. There are of course some differences that could be important to some and less to others. It is indeed true that the tracking works best on the 100 II and that the read out speed is slower, but personally I didn't notice enough of a difference to mention it (but again, it all boils down to what you need and what "slow" or "fast" means to you). Take care

@MarcAdesso

Ай бұрын

@@cris_photography I just got my SII, and so far haven't really noticed a difference.

Do you think that in the photo it has the same quality as the gfx ll

@cris_photography

Ай бұрын

It is the same as the GFX 100 II yes

@rubiseltovilla1827

Ай бұрын

@@cris_photography Thanks for sharing - I would like to know if you think it has the same quality as Hasseblad or one surpasses the other - Regards

@cris_photography

Ай бұрын

@rubiseltovilla1827 I think the are very similar in terms of mp and quality, but you’ll want to check the lenses and that’s what will determine grandly the final IQ. But I think Fuji came a long a way and they make amazing cameras for the price point.

@rubiseltovilla1827

Ай бұрын

What opinion do you have of Hassblad - to tell the truth, it seduces me more

Why is every reviewer talking like the 100s didn't exist. They didn't reduce the size from 100II... it's just 100s with some minor improvements

@cris_photography

Ай бұрын

Sure

@petefricklesome6499

Ай бұрын

Tested both, side by side in a store with the 55/1.7. AF from the new S II is a totally different ball park. To be honest.

@scotttucker9613

Ай бұрын

Because the S II is almost identical to the 100 II in terms of performance. Far better than the original 100S.

@inquisitvem6723

Ай бұрын

Is the viewfinder resolution in the s ii really that much different than the ii?

@cris_photography

Ай бұрын

@inquisitvem6723 HONESTLY? No

Which is better Fujifilm GFX 100S II vs x2d?

@cris_photography

Ай бұрын

Good question! Didn’t test the Haselblad offering so I’d have to try it first 😉

@helloianzakharov

7 күн бұрын

Color is better with Hasselblad, but AF and other features are way better with GFX

@tigerareyouthere

8 сағат бұрын

@@cris_photographyI’m also very interested in this comparison! One thing to keep in mind is that only the new V lenses from Hasselblad have faster autofocus (25, 38, 55, 90) on the X2D body. The other ones are still slow.

Plenty of CF express type B cards are cheaper or similarly priced to SD cards.

@cris_photography

Ай бұрын

Not the good ones (which is why you use those). And since i have prolly 30 SD cards having to switch to CF is utterly annoying and useless if I don’t do video - not to mention the adaptor needed to read that card format (my Mac has SD not CF)

@jtes1442

12 күн бұрын

@@cris_photography Lexar, Sandisk, Delkin and Angelbird are not good?

Video??.... zzzzz

@cris_photography

Ай бұрын

Hum?

this is like running through a spec sheet without telling which camera you are talking about... useless

@cris_photography

7 күн бұрын

Lol