By listening to Swami Sarvapriyananda ji , I can assume the level of Swami Vivekananda's depth of knowledge

@user-tf6eb4nl9w

Ай бұрын

You cannot, nobody can! Not even the swamijis can.

@ambhat3953

Ай бұрын

@@user-tf6eb4nl9w he said he can assume, he didn't say he "knows"

@lopamudra4182

Ай бұрын

​@@user-tf6eb4nl9w exactly

@sdutta8

Ай бұрын

@@user-tf6eb4nl9wSwami Vivekananda himself did not like hero worship.

@Mithilesh_R

Ай бұрын

Hidden Buddhist , read vivekananda books

The way Maharaj has drawn the line between spirituality and science is just wonderful. Shows how rational he is. His narrative is totally different from what is in trend today. Every religious leader claims to know all of the science. Great respect for Maharaj Ji 😌

A great monk, a very towering personality with incredible humility. My soulful regards to Swami Sarvapriyananda Maharaaj!! Having a glimpse of this Sannyasi Maharaj is just as joyful as '' ঝলক দর্শন" in Vrindavana 🌹🌹

@taps9foodtravel

5 күн бұрын

Ur right

That's real wisdom -- never claims to know everyTHING ...

@studypurpose7804

Ай бұрын

any idea? why pm modi says tamil is older than sanskrit, and has vast literatures?

People differentiating between Advaita Vedanta and Buddhism do not understand either.

@Lost_inn_Time

Ай бұрын

The worst thing about today’s world is , most of the people are unaware of any of these philosophies and busy in their materialistic world but those who are aware keep fighting over whose philosophy is superior (as can be seen in the comments ) . Sad how the video is such spiritual but the comments are full of hatred.

@arkamitra4948

Ай бұрын

Perhaps it also needs to be questioned as to if the people who don't differentiate between the two, actually know either?

@theunusual4566

29 күн бұрын

@@arkamitra4948 it's implied in the statement, if one goes on comparing or differentiating both then they must be Knowing both.

@arkamitra4948

29 күн бұрын

@@theunusual4566 Perhaps it needs to be known whether that "implication that the person knows neither" is true. For example, to gain knowledge by using analogy and/or comparison (Upamāna Pramāṇa) of one thing (say, an apple) and another (say, an orange or another apple), it needs to be known: [1] what is known about the apple and to what extent (attributes/traits, functions, relationships with other entities, etc.), [2] what is known about the orange or the other apple and to what extent, [3] what are the means of comparing them, and [4] what are the results of the comparison. Likewise, how is it that you know that the person who differentiates about Buddhism and Advaita, doesn't know either. Shouldn't it first be tested and demonstrated what you know Buddhism and to what extent, and also what you know of Advaita and to what extent, and also that you know of by comparison that there is either no difference or some difference (and also the sameness)? And given that historically there have been argumentative debates (Tarka by application of the tarkaśāstra to defend an inferential standpoint/Siddhānta, or even attack or test another without having one), and there have been influential extant explanatory and literary works as a resultant, is it that all they were ignorant fools with no understanding? Also, without argumentative debates (and trying to differentiate between two things) how do you ensure the testing of own knowledge and understanding, and also the opponent's position, and also the skills to express own position in duress, etc.? Also, what about your statement that "People differentiating between Advaita Vedanta and Buddhism do not understand either". Is it that you suggest that they are same and you have understanding of complete understanding of both (otherwise how to say they are same as a whole/Pūrna, and none of the parts/bhāga are different)? So how about demonstrating your understanding (and with accurate references) that they are same, given that you have already got into the argument by commenting against the people who differentiate between the two?

@arkamitra4948

29 күн бұрын

Now coming to your conclusion that those people do not know either of the two, how about you explain why the Śaṅkarābhāṣyam (extant, explanatory commentary) on the Bhagavad Gita or even the Brahmasūtras discusses (and critiques) Buddhist, Nyaya, Lokāyata/Cārvāka, and even the Vedānta who talk of mixing all paths (like Karma and Jnana together) standpoints? What about Madhusūdana Sarasvatī writing his [i] line-by-line refutations to Nyayamṛta (Dvaita arguments to Advaita by Vyāsatīrtha) in the form of Advaitasiddhi, [ii] the defense of Advaita doctrine against the criticisms of Nyaya in the form of Advaitaratnarakṣā, etc.? Is it that they neither Advaita or the Dvaita or Nyaya scholars knew nothing of their own or their opponents, and were wasting time haggling over potatoes and lemons? What about Raja Janakā arranging for debates in his own court, where Vedic scholars like Gārgī Vāchaknavī and Yājñavalkya used to debate to establish Brahman (metaphysical ontology) and their understanding of it (epistemology)? Is it they were darn totally ignorant about Brahman and even the means to know it? Also, is it that Raja Janaka was also being ignorant and wasteful in just making people argue and fight over something that couldn't be seen or heard? OR is it that he actually learnt by observation of the arguments and inference from observations during the debate? What about the Buddhist Mādhyamaka scholar Bhāviveka vigorously criticizing another scholar Buddhapālita's approach to explaining Nāgārjuna's Madhyamaka standpoint, which was later counter-argued (and defended) by Chandrakīrti? Is it that none of them knew anything of Buddhism or Madhyamaka or even each other's works that they are critiquing and arguing upon?

Sarvapriyananda one of the great teachers of Buddhism in our time.. and I really mean it. Great explanation on the notion of shunyata. Thank you.

@ravindudilshan3041

Ай бұрын

This is not Buddhism

@kalpanajha3305

Ай бұрын

He is a hindu advaita vedan5in monk

@thomasbrouwer2771

Ай бұрын

I know exactly what he is. The comment is a compliment on his knowledge and insight on Buddhism.

@thomasbrouwer2771

Ай бұрын

@@ravindudilshan3041 he spoke about Nagarjuna and the concept of Shunyata in shunyavada Buddhism. I know he is a hindu monk. I have been following his work for years but thank you for the invaluable comment though.

@Turiya_ChEcKPLaYLisT

Ай бұрын

In 6 Vedic Darshan, Samkhya Yog & Vedant Have Especial Position , Samkhya More Talks on Suffering , While Yog Darshan on Meditation , Vedant Consist Upnishad, Bhagwat Geeta , Brahm Sutra and Advait Vedanta Books , Vedanta have Central Topic About Brahman or Arman The Shunya of NagaArjun is Very Very Similar to Brahman of Brihadarnyak Upnishad and Mandukya Upnishad I think NagaArjun Gave A Great Strong Position To Buddhism in Debate , I don't Know How Without Shunyawaad of NagaArjun One can Prove Nirvan Logically , Naga Arjun was A Brahmin Lateron he converted to Buddhism

I ALWAYS THINK AND BELIEVE THAT OUT OF ANY QUESTIONS ASKED, WHETHER IT IS OKAY OR USELESS WHATEVER YOU CALL IT, GREAT ANSWERS LIKE PURE NECTOR WILL COME OUT FROM GREAT TEACHERS. SO, WE SHOULD BE ALWAYS THANKFUL TO THE PERSON WHO HAS GUTS TO ASK ANYTHING, SO ALWAYS BE POSITIVE !!! DON /TIBET FROM NYC

Great answer by the Swami. One aspect of genomics that is interesting to the the "spiritual" world is how we are all related and how information gets passed on from one generation to the next at a genetic level. So what we are today is a product of many millions of years of evolution in this "universe" as we know it that apparently emerged about 14B years ago post big bang and the first cellular life that emerged on earth 4B yrs ago! So, we are the world as J Krishnamurti says!

Guruji aapke Charanome pranamam, 🌹🙏,take the escence from ur view and thoughts and apply in our life in any field,

He is not Buddhist monk

Huge respect to Swami for spreading knowledge and love for both Hindu and Buddhist philosophies and teachings . A wise man will learn something from both , only fools will fight over such philosophies.

@Prashant-ci7vs

Ай бұрын

I know what are you trying to say but I want to tell you that nothings can be learned from wrong views, wrong views only causes suffering that's why buddha dissuade people from wrong view towarde his discovered actual path of enlighetnment. As Buddha said, do not follow anything bcz it is carried down by tradition, only use proper analysis and observation before accepting anything as a part of truth. To remain on the path of truth Buddha asked to take refuge only in Buddha, Dhamma and Sangha, which are known as triple gems. He never accepted everyother ideology as a part of truth just bcz large number of people follow it.

@Lost_inn_Time

Ай бұрын

@@Prashant-ci7vs not everything is right or wrong . There are just different paths for leading a good life . Some may feel connected with the Buddhist philosophy and others with the Vedic philosophy . Many mahapurush have attained liberation in hindu history as well . As you said Buddha wanted us to realise things ourselves , therefore some people may realise the Vedic philosophy better than the Buddhist one and if they are becoming compassionate studying it then what's your problem ? You only are mentioning other paths as wrong and only the Buddha path as right and at the same time saying Buddha wanted us to realise things ourselves . Live and let live .

@Lost_inn_Time

Ай бұрын

@@Prashant-ci7vs for example if I want to make myself compassionate towards animals , I would look into the teachings of great people who spread animal compassion . And I will find both Buddha and hindu gods doing so . I will learn Rigorous ahinsa towards animals from Jainism , the fact that nagarjuna was killed with kusha grass just because he killed an ant before... I will take this lesson from Buddhism and I will learn that hindu gods always had a vahana as animal and took many births in animal form . I am not a monk or a sanyasi that I will have to strictly follow a path , and so aren't you . I am a laity and I just want maximum compassion to emerge in myself and I am not bound to learn it from just a single philosophy .

@Prashant-ci7vs

Ай бұрын

@@Lost_inn_Time in that way you will even take inspiration from Asaram bapu bcz even his teachings have something to learn from(if you look at it that way) but that does not mean what you have viewed about Asaram bapu is his objective reality. It is your own mentality that you don't find anything wrong in the wrong view, not everyone will have the same mental condition and whatever you are speaking is just your way of looking at the respective ideologies you are referring to. If you study carefully without any preoccupied thought, you will realise that the actual teachings of ideologies you are referring to differ in many ways from what you are thinking. Most of the time only true meaning of the teaching will be practiced in the society, otherwise anyone will have freedom to interpret anything from the teachings and education will become pointless. Not everyone will think like you and not what you are thinking makes the true meaning of everything. Therefore, instead of supporting every other ideology you should learn to differentiate right view from the wrong view and only support what is the truth.

@AnkitKumar-mk7ql

29 күн бұрын

​@@Prashant-ci7vs You're nothing but a nitpicker.😂

What an enlightened talk

Quantum mechanics is based on experimental observation. Any similar thinking without experimental proof shouldn't be mixed up with quantum mechanics just because words are similar.

@sumanari4116

Ай бұрын

Then the question will come, why we are trying to understand quantum mechanics? And one more thing, nothing is proved definitely by this double slit experiment.

@souravghosh7558

Ай бұрын

I am not sure what you are trying to say here, Science is based on observations of nature from materialistic perspective including study of consciousnes, but the hard problem of consciousness is yet to be solved. Now the ancient rishis spoke from self realization perspective, which gives the point of view of consciousness being a fundamental property of universe. If you do not want to agree, you are at Liberty to do so but cannot stop others from trying to marry the two again as a thought experiment.

@johnlogan4303

Ай бұрын

Have you never heard of branch of science called theoretical physics? Why is it called physics if theories are not proven yet?

I think the person, who is questioning, didn't read his question carefully. What kind of question is this? A cell is made off millions of electrons.

@KnowtoGrow4354

Ай бұрын

Agreed

@tseringdakini8031

Ай бұрын

I ALWAYS THINK AND BELIEVE THAT OUT OF ANY QUESTIONS ASKED, WHETHER IT IS OKAY OR USELESS, GREAT ANSWERS WILL COME FROM A GREAT TEACHERS. SO, WE SHOULD BE ALWAYS THANKFUL TO THE PERSON WHO HAS GUTS TO ASK ANYTHING, SO ALWAYS BE POSITIVE !!! DON /TIBET FROM NYC

@manandholakia9023

18 күн бұрын

Yes. It's a typical question that people who try to pose as if they are very curious and have philosophical bent, but are actually too lazy to open even a graduate level text book on quantum mechanics.

The most fundamental aspect of creation to which material science (physics, maths etc) can reach i.e. spacetime is well described in the most basic of the Hindu philosophy i.e.Nyaya-Vaisheshika. There the subtlest spacial dimension [dik] and time dimension [kal] are considered as material [dravya] along with mind [mana]. These in turn are made up of more fundamental qualities [guna]. These subtle materials interact to produce "material ideas" [bhaba] in emergent fashion like "action" [karma]. This is akin to QM where probability waves collapse to material reality when observed [i.e. by the mind] or reality emerges from interaction/correlation of more fundamental waves in hierarchic fashion. However one should remember that “physical mind” itself is made up of the same material which it plays with so its action/perception will be limited to the same ingredients that it interacts with. So any appearance of material reality is in the mind of the observer. As Swami Vivekananda says, the mind is the ultimate and supreme energy converter which converts unmanifest energy into its myriad manifestation to appear as external reality. So the entire creation from the unmanifest to spacetime to the system of galaxies down to planetary system, living beings and human society is nothing but a hierarchial emergent system of interacting waveforms changing at every instant as manifest time “emerges” unidirectionally. The all pervasive unmanifest quantum field organises (i.e gets different direction) under the impetus of time which it assimilates (similar to prana in vedanta) into energy channels. Then it is the interaction/correlation/arrangement of these which manifests us and our conceivable universe. Its like how strings [information] make a shirt [our universe]. Only when the strings are arranged in a specific way [parallel to each other but not otherwise, nyaya] can the shirt evolve. Also note that the strings don’t have to be in contact with each other but its their relation (fundamentally ''action'' or karma) and relative position that is producing the fabric.(samanya in nyaya) By other specific such arrangement, different shirts can be produced.(vishesha in nyaya). Time is intricately entangled into everything.(samavyaya in nyaya) The two most fundamental building blocks [science] of creation are physics and mathematics, both having their inception at the concept of zero [big bang in physics and number system in maths]. In philosophy, zero [sunyo] means both "infinity" and number zero. The infinitely infinite symmetrical unmanifest [brahma in vedanta] constricts to a point by a imaginary boundary [maya] which is round [parimandala parimana]. For the infinite to become finite, the circular shape is the most appropriate as it is [finitely] infinite symmetrical about its centre. The other platform where science and philosophy are very near is the concept of information, quantum thermodynamics [heat] and entropy all of which are entangled in creation. The Upanishad says "the sun is veritably the life energy or pran " and physics has discovered that the earth was formed from the sun and it is maintaining all vitality here by continuously supplying "low entropy" via sunlight. In philosophical realms, for manifesting reality, the unmanifest first undergoes symmetry breaking into 50 alphabets/sounds [most fundamental information] "inspired" by the creative force [prana, heat] which by permutation/ combination/arrangements in different ways give rise to the reality describable by those alphabets.

There is a simple answer to Mr. Ashwin Rao and his question of dwaita and adwaita in cell Biology or genomics. Light behaves both as waves and particle in the slit experiment. Same way there are the stem cells with which a Placenta is made up of. Stem cells can grow up into kidney or a lung or a brain cell or even a bone. All that is needed is the insertion of the genetic program code of the targeted body part. So the stem cell is a cell which can behave in any way you direct it to behave.

@rocka_bye3455

18 күн бұрын

yeah its simple

How can u replace electrons with cells? cells are much complex matter composed numerous molecules, whereas electrons are charged particles inside an atom.

@KnowtoGrow4354

Ай бұрын

I agree

@indikafernando4374

26 күн бұрын

Electron is not a particle but a viabrational mode of string .​@@KnowtoGrow4354

It was the German engineers and scientists who laid the foundation of science and technology in USA now Indians are continuing it next they'll return to India once India is ready to launch itself

With due respect let me explain the correct and incorrect statements which is made by you, along with clarifications: ### Correct Statements: 1. **Quantum Mechanics and Relationships:** - Carlo Rovelli’s book *Helgoland* discusses how quantum mechanics involves understanding relationships between particles, aligning with the idea of interdependence. - Nagarjuna's concept of emptiness (śūnyatā) and interdependence (pratītyasamutpāda) in Buddhism reflects the interconnected nature of reality, which resonates with some interpretations of quantum mechanics. 2. **Philosophy and Science Integration:** - The idea that ancient philosophical insights can provide a perspective on modern scientific concepts is valid. Philosophy and science can intersect in meaningful ways, offering deeper understanding. 3. **Importance of Independent Thinking:** - The encouragement to explore and experiment based on insights from various philosophical and scientific sources reflects a valuable approach to integrating knowledge. ### Incorrect Statements and Clarifications: 1. **Quantum Mechanics with Living Cells:** - **Incorrect:** "If we replace electrons with living cells in the double-slit experiment, they will behave the same way as electrons based on the presence or absence of the observer." - **Clarification:** While quantum mechanics shows wave-particle duality in particles like electrons, applying this directly to living cells is problematic. Living cells are complex systems with many degrees of freedom and interactions that make their behavior fundamentally different from elementary particles. 2. **Biological Experiments and Observer Intent:** - **Incorrect:** "The outcome of biological experiments is dependent on the intent of the observer, not on controlled experimental conditions." - **Clarification:** In scientific experiments, controlled conditions are crucial for reproducibility and accuracy. While observer effects in quantum mechanics highlight the role of measurement, this does not imply that biological outcomes are dependent on observer intent in the same way. 3. **Quantum Mechanics and Buddhist Philosophy:** - **Incorrect:** "Nagarjuna knew quantum mechanics." - **Clarification:** Nagarjuna did not know quantum mechanics, as it is a modern scientific theory. The comparison is more about parallels in understanding interconnectedness and not direct knowledge or prediction of quantum phenomena. 4. **Genomics and Spirituality:** - **Incorrect:** "Genomics has not been applied or explored in spirituality or Indian Vedic practices." - **Clarification:** While genomics and spirituality have traditionally been distinct fields, there is growing interest in exploring how genetic research might intersect with or inform spiritual practices. This is an area of ongoing research and development. The statements should be approached with care, especially when integrating scientific and philosophical ideas, as each has its own methodologies and frameworks.

By the way, quantum mechanics, i reckon, doesn't work for macroscopic [rather supra-atomic] things, at least not in the way it works for such minuscule stuff as photons ...

@KnowtoGrow4354

Ай бұрын

Yes

इनको सुनकर लगता है,,,, आप इन्हें सुनते जाएं,, मंत्रमुग्ध हो जाते हैं ऐसा लगता है,, सरलता अद्वितीय है,,

OBSERVE THE OBSERVER IS THE ULTIMATE ...

@freetibet1000

17 күн бұрын

The observer is the observed. -Krishnamurti.

And what's the point of asking that genomics question?

What a priviledge to listen to swamiji

Double slit experiment is for light and subatomic particles, if you throw something massive like cell it will produce no inference bands, because cell is made up of million atoms and mass trillion time higher than electron or photons. Not getting why he asked this question.

@KnowtoGrow4354

Ай бұрын

Agreed.

@mindudorjeenaksang3014

Ай бұрын

Really..n he claims to be studying some bio science..

@Avigislli665

Ай бұрын

Haha, yes, that a stupid person in a wrong place.

Wrong thumbnail, He is Hindu monk, not Buddhists.

Guys please read Triupra Rahasya and Yoga Vasistha. They have concepts very similar to the quantum concept Schrodinger Cat experiment. Especially Tripura Rahasya guys. I'm not kidding.

🙏🙏🙏 guruji swamiji

It's sad that people ask such questions in physics. They ask questions thinking the question is too profound, but these questions are so trivial that even reading the first chapter of any QM book, they would themselves had got the answer. To anyone who has a doubt, just read a paragraph about when a particle can be treated with classical mechanics, and it's trajectory would be completely predictable, and all those observers etc are not at all relevant at all.

Respect from Bangladesh

People usually participate in such events when they get senile prematurely.😊

Einstein famously rejected quantum mechanics saying that God does not play with dice.

@Spectraeducation

Ай бұрын

Then He applied very basics of the quantum mechanics to explain photo electric effect 😊

Namaste! Please suggest a good English version of Mulamadhyamakakarika.

This swamiji is a Hindu monk

Very interesting conversation. Lot of research is going on in this…Swamiji is correct about colonial mindset. Such esteemed researchers are pulled down by so called experts in quantum physics where such things are named under pseudoscience. Western people and scientists are researching our ancient scriptures inundated with such knowledge but Indians especially getting their degrees abroad and considered so called experts in such field call this quackery.

Also Guru nanak ,iam sure tesla read nanak ❤

lets say, you are walking on the road all alone while no one is observing you, Your conduct would be somewhat carefree. BUT the very moment you suspect someone is watching you, instantaneously your conduct would change from carefree to rigidity...wont it be so?!..i presume this is what electrons are doing and YES living cells would also exhibit the same behavioral pattern like that of electrons when being observed!

@KnowtoGrow4354

Ай бұрын

Kindly elucidate a little more

@sherlockholmes7770

Ай бұрын

@@KnowtoGrow4354 First things first, I am neither a QP and/or a QM scientist. In my humble understanding, at the most basic level all organisms are made up of atoms, right? And any atom consists of electron, right? May it be an electron passing through the double-slit OR an electron present in a living cell, it would presumably change its behavior upon being observed, right? Microcosm constitutes the Macrocosm, right? Such being the case, isn’t there a possibility of a human, made up of living cells which are in turn made up of atoms, exhibit behavioral change when being observed consciously!?

Great Swami... Wisdom begins with humility Not arrogance.... All men of Science need read..... Contemplate on the Verses of.... Tao Te Ching... ❤

He is hindu monk not Buddhist monk.

@KnowtoGrow4354

Ай бұрын

Yes

❤❤❤

OM Namah Sri Bhagavate Ramakrishnaya Namo Namaha

🙏❤️🙏

MOTHER NATURE ADHYASHAKTI PARAMPRAKRUTI PARAMPARMESHWARI SUPREME ENERGY SUPREME NATURE SUPREME GOD SUPREME INFINITY IS REAL SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN TRUE GOD ALL IS MAYA OF MAHAMAYA

🙏🙏🙏

Our handicapped nature doesn't allow us to dig down to the rich scientific resource present underneath ancient foundation.

@amitbiswas1885

Ай бұрын

Why not start from yourself by breaking this myth. 😌

@neelufarchoudhury9252

Ай бұрын

​@@amitbiswas1885 Why not? Afterall Seva begins at home.

@ayenpatel3738

Ай бұрын

There is not quantum mechanics in our scriptures

@amitbiswas1885

Ай бұрын

@@ayenpatel3738 🙏

@neelufarchoudhury9252

Ай бұрын

@@ayenpatel3738 Ghar ka bhedi lanka dhaye

Zakir Naik🎉

Nagarjuna specifically rejected vedas as a wrong view as did Buddha. If that swami accepted the superiority of Nagarjuna's philosophy he is literally accepting that Vedanta is a wrong view.

@theunusual4566

Ай бұрын

You need to open your mind a bit.

@Prashant-ci7vs

Ай бұрын

@@theunusual4566 you need to open your mind.

@theunusual4566

Ай бұрын

@@Prashant-ci7vs study both Advaita and Buddhism, you would get the answer. But here the problem is that you don't understand either of them, and commenting carelessly.

@Prashant-ci7vs

Ай бұрын

@@theunusual4566 What you said applies to you. Here is a quote of Buddha from Tevijja sutta: "..But here *the brahmins proficient in the three Vedas* sink down where they have sat, only to drift apart, while imagining they’re crossing over to drier ground. [ I wonder if this is a satire on the idea of upaniṣad (“sitting near”); even as they affirm their commitment to their texts, they drift apart (visāra) into separate schools and ideologies.] That’s why *the three Vedas of the brahmins are called a ‘salted land’ and a ‘barren land’ and a ‘disaster’* ”

@theunusual4566

Ай бұрын

@@Prashant-ci7vs Again, you are stuck on just what Buddha said. You don't have realisation of your own. Have you studied Advaita Vedanta? Have you studied Middle Path of Buddhism ? Have you studied Tibetan Buddhism ? Looks like no, because if you had studies without any prejudice, then you wouldn't utter such. Vadant and Buddhism are not just about what Buddha or Shankara or Shri Krishna said, it's about understanding and realisation of what they said and more.

- This is exactly what Shankaracharya did. - Shankaracharya looted some metaphysical concepts of Buddhism and rotated them 180 degrees. - Shankaracharya then used those same concepts against Buddhism to defeat several monks in debates claiming he has defeated Buddhism. 🤣😂 - Shankaracharya also claimed that Nirvana/Moksha is Atman and justified the existence of eternal Atman/Brahman. This is clearly explained in Nirvana Shatakam. - Advaita Vedanta has a ground to stand is because Vedanta stole concepts from Buddhism. - But Gautam Buddha’s original teachings are still preserved in the Pali Canon.

@mktipsfun1564

Ай бұрын

Grow up kid it's from Upanishads not from Buddhism 😂

@thanislausm4288

Ай бұрын

BUDDHA NEVER COPIED FROM ANYTHINHG. HIS TEACHING ID ORIGINAL AND PURE.​@@mktipsfun1564

@Lost_inn_Time

Ай бұрын

Even if you follow Buddhism only whole-heartedly , you won’t be spitting hatred for any philosopher from another sect . You have neither understood Buddhism nor advaita .

@studypurpose7804

Ай бұрын

any idea? why pm modi says tamil is older than sanskrit, and has vast literatures?

@Visakh_S_Nair

29 күн бұрын

Doesn't Buddhism deny atman, existence of soul? Gautam Buddha himself was a student of dharmic traditions.

He is not Buddhist

क्या चाटोगे क्वांटम मैकेनिक्स को लेकर जब मौत सामने खड़ी होगी। फ़ालतू की बकवास ।

@KnowtoGrow4354

Ай бұрын

किया करोगे यूट्यूब कमेंट्स करके जब मौत हो सामने। सरासर समय की बर्बादी

@SriShridhar

Ай бұрын

@@KnowtoGrow4354 Thanks

Buddhists sre atheists. 😊

any idea? why pm modi says tamil is older than sanskrit, and has vast literatures?

@GloomyGlue

Ай бұрын

To get votes

@studypurpose7804

Ай бұрын

@@GloomyGlue please type and search the below in youtube, and see the pm modi speech. "Surprise ! Narendra Modi on Tamil | Oldest Language| Older than Sanskrit"

@GloomyGlue

Ай бұрын

@@studypurpose7804 He said that to get votes. What else? I don't need to see his speech for that. He is not a credible source at all.

@yeagerist4463

21 күн бұрын

​@@studypurpose7804 So what ?? If Tamil is older than sanskrit so what ?? Why are you people busy to prove that Tamil is older than sanskrit. Both are great language.

@studypurpose7804

19 күн бұрын

@@yeagerist4463 ok. indian people use english for science and technology.

Please dont mix spirituality with science..

@bhuhub4072

Ай бұрын

Go bro and learn about schrondinger

@skycityvlog3602

Ай бұрын

Bro comes from Titan 💀

@nickseth17

28 күн бұрын

lol. Spirituality is science. The science you speak of is very limited. Yet captures the world. This is true science. The change of conciousness. The best science lossible

@mindudorjeenaksang3014

28 күн бұрын

@@nickseth17 waw!! "Spiritual is science" that sounds cool..that means all the babas are scientists..😁

Science of Manifesting in-depth Quantum Physics: Quantum jumping & Quantum field Explained kzread.info/dash/bejne/q2ZouLyhh5e1nqQ.html

Shankracharya stolen buddiest philosphy

@SriShridhar

Ай бұрын

@@Himyug859 Buddhist are just a branch of Sanatan Dharma. All powerful political followers of Buddhism made it into a separate religion.

@rameshchandervishwakarma4030

Ай бұрын

No proof , moreover buddha had a strong influence of upanishadnic rishis .

@doubleslit3066

Ай бұрын

Shankracharya destroyed Buddhism philosophically

@thanislausm4288

Ай бұрын

​@@doubleslit3066 BUDDHA IS LIGHT. HE IS STILL ALIVE ALL OVER THE WORLD. DANKARAA IS A SHADOW, WHETE HE IS?

@nickseth17

28 күн бұрын

Buddhism was integrated because it was dying. Vaishnava made him Vishnu incarnation to save him. We're all in this together man. No need for one to be better. You're lost if you're thinking like this. But what I stated about buddhisms decline is very true. Not because it was bad...but because it was later on

Where all our noble prizes have gone? This guy is just throwing in some terms and pretending he understands cutting edge physics also. I am told he has attended some course on theology at Harvard. Nothing to do with science.

@KnowtoGrow4354

Ай бұрын

Swami Sarvapriyananda ji had already said that he is not a man of physics or genomics. He just quoted eminent Physicist Carlo Rovelli. Don't shout without listening properly

@jpelx81

Ай бұрын

If you want to live under some magic spell of bald head, saffron clad magician so be it.

@kryzer1215

Ай бұрын

​@@jpelx81May you be illumined.

@arijitroy7253

Ай бұрын

​@@jpelx81if u hv some typical personal enmity against bald head n saffron clad, then keep it with you only, don't chatter over here.

@ringostar4904

Ай бұрын

Sad. Either you haven't really understood the Swamiji's response to the question or you are already prejudiced and have therefore taken on an aggressive stance. By the way, I'm not Indian or Hindu and nor do I follow any religious doctrine, but I give credit where it is due and this Swami has brought some hope to the world via his talks and presence on the net. I hope you find peace.

mm