That was a fantastic and very informative tutorial. Please Autodesk, let Matt do more, more in depth videos... He is the expert in fusion!

@LearnEverythingAboutDesign

6 ай бұрын

Wow thanks :)

@emanggitulah4319

6 ай бұрын

@@LearnEverythingAboutDesign would really love to see more. Thanks for the great work

Thanks for posting this. It's like you read my mind. You covered exactly what I wanted to know when I opened KZread!

Excellent refresher Matt. I am still mainly using the free form body option - It gives me more control. But another useful workflow is using a tool called "Instant Meshes" to convert triangular to Quad meshes. Then use fusion´s Quad-to t-spline conversion. Hope it helps.

@LearnEverythingAboutDesign

6 ай бұрын

Awesome tip Luis!

Thank you for this! Things will be so much easier now!

Wow , so much info. Nice video

this is amazing, It help me a lot

Very informative. Can you recommend a learning approach to forms? Which videos to you have or other creators?

@LearnEverythingAboutDesign

5 ай бұрын

Craig, I have a forms mastery playlist on my channel as well as loads of forms content for modeling everything from simple shapes to cars. kzread.info/head/PLBDfGh8A8kXWCgB3Q5DYiCDSCxCqw8tJ7 kzread.info/head/PLBDfGh8A8kXW2KBn0b7pMsH5q6FLfSYql

Great Video, Thanks! What if you do what to orient the mesh to your default plane orientation though? Your mesh here was off by .151 degrees which was considered negligible so you didn't align mesh to the default plane. Curious as to how that could be accomplished. Thanks

Nice video. Is there any way to export the subdiv mesh from the Free-form modeling process without converting to B-Rep or triangular facets? Would be useful for getting mechanical or semi-organic parts that are easily modelled in F360 into other subdiv based modelling apps for detailing. Cheers.

What are the favorite resources for quad conversion?

Wait. Is that Matt from Learn Everything About Design? Did I miss something?

@LearnEverythingAboutDesign

6 ай бұрын

Nothing Missed. I have been making videos for Autodesk since 2016 for their learning portal. I am a contractor/consultant for them and was asked to remake some old youtube videos recently so there are more coming.

Thanks f360 team for the effort but the software is lacking good and efficient tools for reverse engineering. Form mode is clunky in term of ergonomy and snapping has bugs. Quadconvert is a good solution but only for very low quality reverse engineering. Mesh section could be enough To do the job, i have recreated many complex foundry or mechanical parts based on high quality 3d scan, but the problem is it lacks some tools to be more efficient, fast and accurate: mesh quick select tool with controled propagation, primitives fitting on mesh, enhanced mesh section (multiple sections, radial sections, sections limited to selection, sections on path, silhouette), mesh deviation compare to cad, 3d sketch that fits to mesh, fit form surface on mesh (based on selection and/or driven by 3d sketches)... So many good tools that could possibly be implemented in a f360 extension. For me, f360 doesn't take this seriously. I understand this domain is not your main objective because a majority of your audience don't give a fuck about 3d scanning, but that's very frustrating to see 70% of the tools implemented but without much more development to make them fully efficient.

@davidmurrell403

2 ай бұрын

Agreed

- great! - thx.

Day 4 of asking for Dark Mode in Fusion 360

@everythingatlasgamingandmo1386

6 ай бұрын

They do have dark mode its not called it but it’s under viewport or display the tiny ribbon at the bottom of your fusion pov

@gkoornhof

6 ай бұрын

@@everythingatlasgamingandmo1386 Proper Dark Mode needed, not just the environment setting 👍

@emanggitulah4319

6 ай бұрын

Viva la persistence 😄

@jaemelo2693

5 ай бұрын

Ask using the proper channels on the forums not the KZread comments section.

@gkoornhof

5 ай бұрын

@@jaemelo2693 That has been tried for years

Buggiest program i’ve ever used. Been using 3d CAD for ~15 years…

@Factory400

6 ай бұрын

Ive been using Solidworks since 1998 and Fusion360 since 2018. Fusion360 has been very stable. Guessing hardware configuration is important.

@Te4mUp

6 ай бұрын

@@Factory400 Been like this over 3 brand new fresh max'd out macbook pros. Hardware's been fine on every one. Fusion's been worse than wine programs that ran on hackintoshes that didn't have the correct plist files.

@Factory400

6 ай бұрын

@Te4mUp There is a reason I have abandoned Apple for engineering work. The PC/Windows version is demonstrably more stable. I use Linux for code and infrastructure. Windows for CAD/CAM and other engineering software. After many dozens of Apple machines from mid 90s to 2019 or so....no more. They are slick until they aren't.

@acintron3Dmfg

6 ай бұрын

It happened to me using apple. Indeed apple have a phenomenal UI/UX for the moment most software are NOT compatible with Apple for example Netfabb.

@emanggitulah4319

6 ай бұрын

Fusion 360 should run way better now on macos. I prefer working on windows with cad. Not much option for macos

would be nice if Fusion team developed AI method to convert STL/OBJ mesh into soft bodies or bodies automatically

@spamone

5 ай бұрын

You can't. You can convert with auto surface some simple bodies but we are far from automatic parametric reverse engineering. Doing reverse engineering based on scan is like a craft. It needs a lot of experience and "feelings"